• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Determination of Nitrogen Application Rates with Paddy Soil Types for Production of High Rice Quality

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Determination of Nitrogen Application Rates with Paddy Soil Types for Production of High Rice Quality"

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Determination of Nitrogen Application Rates with Paddy Soil Types for Production of High Rice Quality

*· · · · 1· 1· 2

Yo-Sung Song*, Ki-Sang Lee, Beung-Gan Jung, Hee-Joong Jun, Kang-Su kwag1, Byeong-Yeol Yeon1and Young-Sang Yoon2

, 1 , 2

National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon 441-707, Korea

1National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Suwon 441-857, Korea

2Department of Plant Resources, Kongju National University, Kongju 340-702, Korea

The primary concern on fertilizer recommendations on paddy soils in Korea is not high rice yield but high rice quality, sustainable rice yield, and less environmental loads these days. Based on soil survey data, the paddy soils in Korea were classified into five large management types ; normal, sandy, immatured, poorly drained, saline soil. In order to establish the optimum level of nitrogen fertilizer to increase the rate of head rice yield, field experiments were conducted at 24 farmhouses throughout the country with nitrogen fertilizer treatment levels of 0, 50, 70, 90, 110, 140, 170 kg ha-1from 2003 to 2004. As the result of the experiment, the optimum rates of nitrogen fertilizer for improving rice quality were 90 kg ha-1in normal, sandy, and poorly drained soils, 100 kg ha-1in immatured soils, and 112 kg ha-1in saline soils where the content of NaCl in soil was below 0.1%. The optimum rates of nitrogen fertilizer were determined in view of head rice percent, protein content, and palatability value of rice.

Key words : Rice quality, Nitrogen application rate, Paddy soil type, Head rice yield

(minimum market access : MMA)

WTO(world trade organization)

, .

.

, ,

.

, , ,

. Mg/K ,

, /

(RDA, 1993; Park et al., 2004).

.

(Park et al., 2004; Lee and Oh, 1991).

.

(Eom, 2005; Ahn and Kim, : 2006. 2. 2 : 2006. 2. 20

* : Phone: +82312900327, E-mail: [email protected]

(2)

1996).

.

(NIAST, 1999).

,

.

(Park, 1977; Lee et. al., 1988), ,

(Lee, 1986; Lee et. al., 1988; NIAST, 1999).

('46- 56) 80 ('65-68) 106 ('71) 107 ('76) 119 ('78) 128 ('82) 110 ('05) 90 kg ha-1 (Park et al., 2001;

Ryu, 2001).

.

2003-2004 24

. , ( ),

,

, ,

, ,

, , 5 .

12, 5,

1, 3, 3 .

,

0, 50, 70, 90, 110, 140, 170 kg ha-1

7 .

0, 70, 110, 150, 180, 200, 240 kg ha-1 7 ,

.

NaCl 0.1%

.

2

. , ,

(RDA, 1999) .

2004 Table 1

,

, .

pH, ,

.

. 1

, ,

.

pH .

HClO4+H2SO4 T-N Micro-Kjeldahl (RDA, 2000).

KETT RN-500 ,

, ,

Soil type SiO2

Mg Ca

K

Exchangeable Cation Av.P2O5

T-N OM

pH

1:5 g kg-1 % mg kg-1 --- cmol+kg-1--- mg kg-1 Soil

tex.

SiCL-CL SL SL CL-C SiCL SL-C

5.8 5.7 7.0 5.5 5.4 5.7

25 26 14 22 13 22

0.12 0.11 0.06 0.12 0.09 0.10

60 73 89 47 16 57

0.39 0.18 0.15 0.43 0.66 0.36

5.9 3.5 7.8 5.4 4.6 5.3

1.2 0.4 2.1 1.8 4.2 1.6

281 112 221 240 119 205 Normal

Sandy Poorly drained Immatured Saline Average

Table 1. Physico-chemical properties of soil used for the field experiment.

(3)

Juliano (Juliano et al., 1981),

5.95

. (Toyo MA-90)

.

2003-2004 12, 5, 1,

3, 3 24

Table 2 Table 3 .

, , ,

, ,

.

2

Table 3 ha 138 kg, 148

kg, 159 kg, 170 kg, 190 kg Table 2

. Table 4

.

.

90-110 kg ha-1 50-70 kg ha-1

2-3% , 140-170 kg

ha-1 1.0%

.

90%,

88% , ,

, 85%

.

18%

(Ahn et al., 1996).

N levels 0 50 70 90 110 140 170 200 240 Aver. yield Max. N levels

3,590 4,070 4,270 4,350 4,430 4,480 4,400 - - 4,227 4,138

3,550 3,960 4,190 4,350 4,490 4,400 4,440 - - 4,197 4,148

2,490 3,430 3,540 3,780 4,120 4,130 4,120 - - 3,659 4,159

3,090 3,920 4,150 4,260 4,470 4,610 4,730 - - 4,176 4,170

3,620 4,190 4,290 4,410 4,580 4,680 4,740 4,750 4,680 4,438 4,190

3,477 4,017 4,210 4,322 4,453 4,490 4,480 - - 4,207 4,151 Average Saline

Immatured Poorly drained

Sandy Normal

Paddy soil type Table 3. Yield of head rice with soil type and N application levels. (Unit: kg ha-1)

N levels 0 50 70 90 110 140 170 200 240 Aver. yield Max. N levels

4,090 4,730 4,980 5,170 5,290 5,380 5,320 - - 4,994 4,151

4,080 4,620 4,890 5,170 5,310 5,310 5,360 - - 4,963 4,165

3,140 3,860 4,140 4,410 4,770 4,910 5,030 - - 4,323 4,170

3,380 4,330 4,670 4,890 5,180 5,410 5,480 - - 4,763 4,170

3,930 4,520 4,680 4,890 5,070 5,210 5,320 5,400 5,350 4,930 4,214

3,940 4,595 4,850 5,068 5,231 5,328 5,336 - - 4,907 4,167 Average Saline

Immatured Poorly drained

Sandy Normal

Paddy soil type Table 2. Yield of polished rice with paddy soil type and N application levels. (Unit: kg ha-1)

(4)

,

,

(Toruyuki, 1990). 2001

2004 4

2000 57.4%, 2001 71.4%, 2002 74.2%, 2003 82.1%, 2004 85.5%

(Eom, 2005).

Table 5 .

110 kg ha-1

90 kg ha-1 6.6-6.7% ,

140 kg ha-1 7.1-7.3%

. ,

, , ,

, .

50 kg ha-1 6.5%

110 kg ha-1 6.2-6.3%

.

,

.

(Lee and Oh, 1991; Ahn and Kim, 1996; Cha et al., 1982; Choi, 1996).

Table 6 . Toyo

, Toyo . Table 7

,

, , ,

N levels (kg ha-1) 0 50 70 90 110 140 170 200 240 Average

88 86 86 84 84 83 83 - - 85

87 86 86 84 84 83 83 - - 85

80 89 85 86 86 84 82 - - 85

91 91 89 87 86 85 86 - - 88

92 91 92 90 90 90 89 89 89 90

88 87 87 85 85 84 84 - - 86 Average Saline

Immatured Poorly drained

Sandy Normal

Paddy soil type Table 4. Percent of head rice with soil type and N application levels. (Unit : %)

N levels (kg ha-1) 0 50 70 90 110 140 170 200 240 Average

6.5 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.9 7.1 7.3 - - 6.8

6.6 6.6 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.1 7.4 - - 6.9

7.4 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.2 7.6 7.8 - - 7.4

6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.6 6.6 - - 6.3

6.9 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.2

6.6 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.9 7.1 7.3 - - 6.8 Average Saline

Immatured Poorly drained

Sandy Normal

Paddy soil type Table 5. Content of protein in rice with soil type and N application levels. (Unit: %)

(5)

. ,

. 15%

, 75

(Choung et al., 1995).

amylose amylopectin

.

,

17-20% (Choi, 1996).

, ,

. Cate

& Nelson(1965) Reagan(1994) 95%

, Lee et al.(2005) 98% ,

Bray(1994) 95-98%

. Table 8

100 Bray (Bray, 1994) 95-98%

.

, , 80-100 kg ha-1, 90- 110 kg ha-1, ( ) 100-130 kg ha-1

, ,

. (

) , , 89 kg ha-1,

100 kg ha-1, ( ) 112 kg ha-1 .

95% ha 5,000 kg

(Table 9).

ha 2004 5,040 kg, 2005 4,900 kg .

Table 9 . 1 2

.

N levels (kg ha-1) 0 50 70 90 110 140 170 200 240 Average

18.9 18.8 18.7 18.8 18.7 18.8 18.8 - - 18.8

18.8 18.9 18.9 18.8 18.7 18.9 18.8 - - 18.8

17.8 17.9 18.1 17.9 18.1 18.0 18.1 - - 18.0

18.3 18.3 18.3 18.4 18.3 18.3 18.2 - - 18.3

18.8 18.8 18.8 18.7 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.7 18.7 18.8

18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.6 18.7 18.7 - - 18.7 Average Saline

Immatured Poorly drained

Sandy Normal

Paddy soil type Table 7. Content of amylose in rice with soil type and N application levels. (Unit: %)

N levels (kg ha-1) 0 50 70 90 110 140 170 200 240 Average

71.7 71.0 68.5 70.0 69.1 66.8 64.8 - - 68.8

73.1 71.9 72.0 71.1 69.6 68.4 67.0 - - 70.4

70.8 73.7 72.6 72.4 70.9 71.0 70.9 - - 71.8

80.9 80.9 80.5 80.1 79.8 79.1 78.4 - - 80.0

74.5 75.6 75.0 74.9 75.0 74.0 73.5 72.3 71.3 74.0

73.5 73.1 71.7 72.2 71.4 69.7 68.3 - - 71.4 Average Saline

Immatured Poorly drained

Sandy Normal

Paddy soil type Table 6. Toyo palatability value with soil type and N application levels.

(6)

(110 kg ha-1)

(90 kg ha-1) (4,333 kg ha-1) (5,049 kg ha-1) 2-3%

Toyo .

.

,

.

.

(Jung et al., 2003)

Table 10 .

“N(kg ha-1)

= 127.4 - 1.52·OM + 0.28·SiO2” 2003 (Jung et al., 2003)

23 g kg-1 118 mg kg-1

125 kg 110kg

(F , 0.877) “N(kg ha-1) = 111.7 - 13.3·

Paddy soil type

Levels of optimal N application were determined in view of head rice, protein content and palatability value.

Normal Sandy Poorly drained Immatured Saline

80-100 80-100 80-100 90-110 100-130

89 89 89 100 112 Range of opt. N levels

--- kg ha-1--- Opt. N levels Table 8. Optimal N application levels of head rice with paddy soil type.

Fig.1. Yield of head and pollished rice with N application levels.

Rice 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

4,127 (93 ) 4,764 (92) 86.6

4,204 (95) 4,869

(94) 86.3

4,273 (97) 4,964

(96) 86.1

4,333 (98) 5,049

(97) 85.8

4,384 (99) 5,124

(99) 85.6

4,425 (100) 5,188 (100) 85.3

4,458 (101) 5,242 (101) 85.0

4,481 (101) 5,285 (102) 84.8

4,496 (102) 5,319 (103) 84.5

4,501 (102) 5,342 (103) 84.3 Head

Pollished

% of head rice

Yield index in each corresponding

N application levels

Table 9. N application rates for head and pollished rice yield with goal levels. (Unit: kg ha-1)

(7)

OM + 0.25·SiO2 . 110 kg ha-1 1.00

F 0.82

, F ,

(ha 90 kg)

ha 90 kg

“N(kg ha-1) = 91.4 - 1.09·OM +

0.2·SiO2 .

.

Table 11 ,

Fig. 2. Characteristics of rice quality.

Perfect kernel Damaged kernel Green kerneled rice Broken rice

N rate 110 90

1.00 4,340 100 5,000 100

0.82 4,230 197 4,840 197

Modified N recommendation based on the monitering data of soil chemical properties in 2003 : N(kg ha-1) = 91.4 - 1.09·OM + 0.2·SiO2

Index Yield

Index Yield

Head rice Rice

Correction coefficient ( F )

Table 10. Rice yield and correction coefficient by N fertilizer rates. (Unit: kg ha-1)

Region

* Study on establishment of optimal N rate with ecology type for rice (National Institute of Crop Science, 2004)

* Rice varieties : Hwa-seong byeo, Sang-mi byeo, O-dae byeo

Mg/K Protein

T-N Stem

Leaf Cereal

T-N Rice

N levels (kg ha-1)

0 50 70 90 110 140 170

0 50 70 90 110 140 170

0 70 110 150 180 200 240

1.19 1.20 1.19 1.21 1.30 1.38 1.34

1.11 1.17 1.17 1.23 1.13 1.20 1.18

1.03 1.10 1.12 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.12

1.02 1.18 1.19 1.28 1.34 1.44 1.68

0.77 0.78 0.80 0.84 0.85 0.97 1.13

0.74 0.79 0.96 1.11 1.10 1.06 1.10

0.61 0.65 0.66 0.69 0.77 0.78 0.94

0.54 0.59 0.58 0.59 0.62 0.64 0.69

0.45 0.51 0.52 0.62 0.72 0.72 0.70

0.60 0.62 0.63 0.64 0.73 0.70 0.70

0.55 0.56 0.62 0.66 0.80 0.83 0.91

0.76 0.78 0.79 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.85

3.75 3.88 3.94 4.00 4.56 4.38 4.38

3.44 3.50 3.88 4.12 5.00 5.18 5.68

4.75 4.88 4.94 5.88 5.75 5.62 5.31

1.95 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.43 1.27

2.05 1.88 1.79 1.63 1.63 1.50 1.37

2.05 1.43 1.20 1.20 1.20 0.98 0.91 Suwon

Cheolwon

Namyang

Table 11. Content of N in rice at harvesting stage with N application levels. (Unit : %)

(8)

T-N , Mg/K

, , T-N

,

, Mg/K .

Okamoto(1988) 15

21 ( 21% )

, ,

.

Mg/K Mg/N

, Okamoto(1988) Toruyuki(1990)

Mg P N, K,

.

2003-2004 24

.

,

, Toyo

. T-N

, Mg/K

.

ha , ,

80-100 kg(89 kg), 90-110 kg (100 kg), ( ) 100-130 kg(112 kg) .

Ahn, S.Y., and D.H. Kim. 1996. Effects of application rates on quality of rice. Institute of Agricultural Resources Research, Dong- A Univ., Korea. 3:9-16.

Bray, R.H. 1994. A nutrient mobility concept of soil-plant. relations.

Soil Sci. 78:9-22.

Cate, R.B., and L.A. Nelson. 1965. A rapid method correlation of soil test analysis with plant response data. International Soil Testing Tech. Bull. No. 1. Approved by the North Calolina State University. Agricultural Experiment Station.

Cha, K.H., Y.S. Kim, and D.K. Lee. 1982. Effects of application levels of fertilizer on the susceptibility to bacterial leaf blight, yield

and quality of grains in nineteen rice cultivars in Jeonnam region.

Korean J. Plant Prot. 21:216-221.

Choi, Y.K. 1996. Characteristics of quality with fidelity distribution and fidelity of rice grain under the different rice cultivars and cultivation environments. Graduate School, Jeonbuk National University. Jeonju, Korea.

Choung, J.I., S.J. Seok, W.Y. Choi, and T.O. Kwon. 1995. Variation of rice quality characteristics with rice cultivation type in Honam Area. Research Report of Rural Development Administration.

37:61-67.

Eom, K.C. 2005. Measure for improving rice quality with market sale of imported rice. In proceedings of symposium for improving rice quality in Korea. p.27-51. National Institute of Crop Science, RDA.

Juliano, B.O., C.M. Perz, A.B. Blakeney, T. Castillo, N. Kongseree, B. Laignelet, E.T. Lapis, V.V.S. Murty, C.M. Paule, and B.D.

Webb. 1981. International cooperative testing on the amylose content of milled rice. Staerke 33:157-162.

Jung, B.G., G.B. Jung, K.R. Cho, S.J. Lim, H.J. Kim, Y.K. Nam, Y.H. Moon, H.K. Kwon, Y.J. Suh, Y.H. Lee, and S.C. Lee. 2003.

Annual report of the monitoring project on agro-environmental quality. p.9-17. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA.

Lee, C.S. 1986. Studies on determination of N-fertilizer rates for increasing rice yield in paddy soils. Research Reporters of RDA.

28:6-21.

Lee, C.S., H.K. Kwak, K.S. Hwang, and J.K. Park. 1988. Estimation for application amount of N fertilizer in mid mountainous paddy soils with special reference to content of organic matter and available silica in Soils. Research Reporters of RDA. 30:41-47.

Lee, C.S., J.T. Lee, G.J. Lee, Y.N. Yoon, and S.W. Hwang. 2005.

Recommendations of NPK fertilizers based on soil testing for major crops in Alpine area. Research Report of National Institute of Highland Agriculture, RDA. p.29-54.

Lee, J.H., and Y.J. Oh. 1991. Yield and quality of rice by continuous application of NPK and organic matter. Korean J. Crop Sci.

36:332-339.

Lee, S.E, J.K. Park, J.H. Yoon, and M,S. Kim. 1987. Studies on the chemical properties of soil under the vinyl house cultivation.

Research Report, Rural Development Administration (Soil and Fertilizers) 29:28-34.

NIAST. 1999. Fertilizer application recommendation for crops.

National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA.

Okamoto, T. 1988. Technology for palatability characteristics testing by chemical analaysis in rice breeding. Reports of Research Conference on Uses and Varieties of Rice. China Agriculture Experiment.

Park, C.S. 1977. Determination of nitrogen dosage for paddy from interrelated organic matter and silica soil test values. Proceeding of the International Seminar on Soil Environment and Fertility Management under Intensive Agriculture p.230-239.

Park, Y.H., J.Y. Lee, S.C. Kim, and P.J. Kim. 2001. Evaluation study on environmental affects by fertilizer use in cultivation lands. Research Report of National Institute of Agricultural

(9)

Science and Technology. RDA. p.3-46.

Park, Y.H., Y. Lee, J.S. Noh, S.C. Kim, and K.S. Lee. 2004.

Integrated nutrition management for rice cultivation. Plant Nutrition Division, Dept. of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea.

RDA. 1993. Effect of foliar application of liquid magnesium fertilizer on rice quality, Practical use of farming agriculture(Soil

& Fertilizer), Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea NIAST. 1999. Methods of Soil and Crop Plant Analysis. National

Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea.

Reagan, M.W. 1994. Best management practices for phosphorus fertilization. Best Management Practices for Colorado Agriculture p.1-20.

Ryu, I.S. 2001. A plan of fertilizer application for minimizing environment influence. In proceedings of symposium on integrated nutrient management for friendly environment agriculture. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology p.53-68.

Toruyuki, S. 1990. Study on palatability of rice in Japan. A Seminar for Korean and Japan Cooperation Study. NIAST, RDA, Suwon, Korea.

참조

관련 문서

Distribution of Cd in stream sediments, paddy soils, rice stalks and grains from the Kubong

The purpose of this research was to suggest the water quality improvement in streams by evaluating the distribution characteristics of organics and ammonia nitrogen

The dry matter yields per nitrogen kg were higher(p<0.01) in chemical fertilizer, pig slurry single application and pig slurry plus chemical

Influence of time and rate of nitrogen application on production and botanical composition of forage.. Sudangrass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids

High level of nitrogen fertilizer application increased the nitrogen contents in all the parts of citrus trees.. But there was no change in sugar and

In conclusion, the growth and yield of potato was not different between mixed fertilizer(chemical fertilizer : liquid pig manure = 1:1) and the

A laboratory experiment was performed to investigate the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from plating factory effluent using the soil column.. Soil,

“Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Rice Production in Nepal.” Rice Science and Technology in Nepal.. Crop Development Directorate and Agronomy Society