• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A population-based study using data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A population-based study using data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service"

Copied!
1
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

AHBPSAnnals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

www.ahbps.org S90

Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy:

A population-based study using data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service

Jun Suh LEE, Yoo-Seok YOON*, Moonhwan KIM, Boram LEE, Hae-Won LEE, Jai Young CHO, Ho-Seong HAN Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

BP-OP-3-3

Introduction: It has been shown that laparoscopic pancreatic resection (LPR) is comparable to open pancreatic resection (OPR). How- ever, cost-effectiveness analysis of LPR is rare. We performed a population-based study on the cost-effectiveness of LPR versus OPR.

Methods: Data of 9,255 patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (66.8%) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) (33.2%) from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved from the National Health Insurance Service. Events after pancreatectomy were categorized as no complica- tions, intervention, reoperation, and death. Probabilities of each event and average cost during index admission (IA) and postoperative 1 year (Po1Y) were utilized to calculate incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), the cost difference between two interventions di- vided by quality adjusted life year (QALY). QALY, a function of length and quality of life, was measured with utility values determined by researching literature.

Results: LPR was performed in 8.2% of PDs and 17.8% of DPs. For PD, LPR was associated with an increase of 0.0404 QALYs for IA and 0.0127 QALYs for Po1Y compared with OPR. Incremental cost was 421,917 KRW for IA and -1,860,579 KRW for Po1Y, leading to an ICER of 10,437,432 KRW per QALY gained for IA and -146,752,689 KRW per QALY gained for Po1Y. For DP, LPR improved 0.0909 QALYs for IA and 0.0469 QALYs for Po1A. Incremental cost was -1,632,107 KRW for IA and -7,730,674 KRW for Po1Y, leading to an ICER of -17,954,499KRW per QALY gained for IA and -164,990,346 KRW for Po1Y.

Conclusions: Except initial higher cost of LPR, LPR was a cost-effective alternative to OPR for PD and DP.

pISSN: 2508-5778ㆍeISSN: 2508-5859

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021;25 Suppl 1:S90 https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.BP-OP-3-3

Corresponding Author: Yoo-Seok YOON (yoonys@snubh.org) Presenter: Jun Suh LEE (rudestock@gmail.com)

Copyright Ⓒ The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

참조

관련 문서

Indirect costs of a cost object are related to the particular cost object but cannot be traced to it in an economically feasible (cost-effective) way.. For example, the

지금 공장이 포화상태로 현재 공장으로는 도저히 제품을 생 산하는데 한계가 있어, 회사 옆 부지에 새로운 제2공장 을

You can use Cost Explorer to see patterns in how much you spend on AWS resources over time, identify areas that need further inquiry, provide recommendations for

Study of diabetes and the nutrition education and awareness of nutrition labels in Korean adults: Using data from the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination

Objective: This study was conducted to identify the association between vitamin D and osteosarcopenia among all adults in Korea using data from the Korea National Health

Also, in order to estimate the consequentially colliding relations of the benefits and cost of using location based services, perceived value, security

Figure 6-15 shows a distribution for the typical cost components of OPEX for a deepwater development. The percentage of each cost component of the total OPEX varies from

à O r cost form las for operations ignore cost of writing res lts to disk à Our cost formulas for operations ignore cost of writing results to disk à Overall cost = Sum of costs