• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Korean Chemical Engineering Research

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Korean Chemical Engineering Research"

Copied!
6
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 43, No. 1, February, 2005, pp. 33-38. CG ¬C _ã- Z ë-W§÷o¿ tŸW£ `Ï{ ó÷. %K? o* ‹Ð †. **. KDòÉtõC hdàõCz, *fg,¬íèz 305-353 ¬MQ K C ,Ÿ 150 **KDêH,¬ò @dHàHê 305-701 ¬MQ K C C Ÿ 373-1 (2004¸ 11ö 22³ [¤, 2005¸ 2ö 17³ >) Simulation on the Distribution of Vanadium- and Iron-Picolinate Complexes in the Decontamination Waste Solution Joon-Bo Shim†, Won-Zin Oh* and Jong-Duk Kim** Division of Nuclear Chemical Engineering Research, *Division of Decontamination and Decommissioning Technology Development, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 150, Duckjin-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-353, Korea **Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute Science and Technology, 373-1, Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea (Received 22 November 2004; accepted 17 February 2005). ß È. )-”«6 ôdfÍ Ë´À2 f Uъ à÷³ Ú { «5܋ ~ MŸs pH àê Æ « Œñ ñ 6 ÆQъ H GŒ. )-”«6 ¬ à÷³‹ P9õ ³_K àk³ Ê_GÊ  «5‹ ‰õ ¡dQ   Î ~ ˎ‹ =2 à÷³Ñ ¬K )-”«6‹ ‰Í 6 ¯ Ê ‰ Ú 3 ¯ I ‰ LOMI f ÆQ‹ ÄUъ H& ¿j à\( :IŒ. 6÷ I ‰ )-”«6 ÆQ‹ ÄUъ2 {(II)-)-”«6‹ ~ ˎ‹ =Í Q« ¡dG2), «Q ço  o ÄUÑ Ë´À2 {Ñ ¬K )-”«6‹ ¬J¯ Š« zÇ G, )éÑ ³´÷ à÷³(III) Ú {(II) «5Ü« )-”«6 ôdís  G2 8_‰ ¤(stability constant) ‹ ó«ÑŠ 9ÇêŒ. á õCъ CK ~ ˎo «5/h ÆÊê ço LOMI f U‹ s- ê_ъ Ä U‹ ÆQ ¡dÑ ñ ä  s +GM÷ «gG2) kÎ KÄGj lÄî ¤ ÀŒ. Abstract − The distribution of vanadium and iron ionic species in the presence of picolinate ligand has been simulated at various conditions with different pH values and compositions in the decontamination waste solution. In spite of variations of metal concentration in the decontamination solution, the shape of distribution diagrams were not changed greatly at both high (the molar ratio of picolinate to vanadium is 6) and low (the molar ratio is 3) LOMI decontamination conditions. However, in the solution of low-picolinate condition the shape of the distribution diagram of iron(II)picolinate complexes was changed significantly. This phenomenon is attributed to the shortage of relative amount of picolinate ligand to iron existed in the solution, and originated from the difference in stability constants for complexes formed between vanadium(III) and iron(II) species with picolinate ligand. The distribution diagrams obtained in this study can be applied very usefully to the prediction or understanding the reaction phenomena occurred at various conditions in the course of the LOMI waste treatments such as an ion exchange operation. Key words: Decontamination, Distribution, Picolinate, Complexes, Waste Solution, Iron, Vanadium. 1.. C «. ö   Dí¯  Î s~ßъ ßDÑÑ U° IßQ ö   í 0‹ «Ÿs KèQE s~ 8M s IgGD A髌[1]. 6‚ ³ ö   Dí Ñ Ë´À2 ôdío äf‹ ¬ « æ, ö.   Dí‹ s~ MÑ JQK s- örs «ÄGñ ôdfõ ~- Ú fMG2 a« ®gêŒ[2]. ôdfÍ Ë´À2 Dí‹ s-Ñ2 & Í( ö8s ÊsO ¤ ÀŒ. ôdf‹ élÄs .g ¡¤GM÷ R( :k

(2) df E. Dí s-Ñ À´ ôdí‹  o [ÎK éfõ KèKŒ. q 7G

(3) , ôdfQ Š «5܋ äÑ ‹g  ê ôdí« U¾ † To. whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. ‡. « øéo KЬH/ é§, /¤‹ _¸s ,ÄGñ ·ÊæÉ5nŒ. 33.

(4) [CÝö1ò,ö6ÜÄ. 34. o hòf Ùs «ÄGñ ôdfõ dHJk³ ~gKŒ. «5 ôdí« Ë´À2 Dís s-O A «÷ DÍ õ( :‰´ ÄU‹ pHõ ÆQKŒ. , pHõ Í 2 ÝQk³ ôdí « ‚† õ( :2 «÷ DÍ  æ´ Dê_« Ä«g0 ¤ ÀŒ. s-O U yÑ ÊéG2 «5܋ ~¯õ ¡dQÿD .Gñ pH às ÆQG2), pH à« ”¶(

(5) s- à_‹ ÆÆ ÆQ« ÷ zMí‹ Ž_Ñ s k ¤ ÀŒ. ÄU yÑ ÊéG2 Î « 5܋ ¬J¯ Š , ñ6 Í( «5܋ ~¯2  Ú ôdí‹ «Â <s, îwê  ¤ à Ú pH às «ÄGñ ªO ¤ ÀŒ. MÑ2 ÄU  «5܋ ~ Ú ñ  ~‹ Äg‰ Ñ ¬K Us g G2  ~‹ s +GD .Gñ ɝ Ãõ lÄGñ H KŒ. «Q ço H ’ê , U_K H1ª ъ  ôdí‹ ô MŸÑ ¬K (Rk³z Yf ªÑŠ ³´÷2 «Ë‹ MŸs kÎ K Gj +O ¤ ÀŒ. ôdí‹ ~ 2 «5Gh äÑŠ ³´÷2 «5‹ ¯4щ Œ º s gŒ[3, 4]. á õgъ2 òɳ -Ϊ‹ ö   1í fM(f)Q  Dí³ è@G2 low oxidative-state metal Ion(LOMI) fÄU   Š«5‹ «5Gh U s [@ Æ O IJk³, )-” «T ôdfÍ Ë´À2 ÄUъ à÷³ Ú { «5܋ ôdí ~ MŸs Æ ê pH à« Œñ ñ6 ÆQъ H GŒ. 2.. _ã-ë-‡§÷o¿  K§ tŸW ` û. gG Z gGô¬£ | ³äJk³ òɳ -Ϊ‹ ö   1í fM,  fo ö.   í0ê Wÿ MJæ´ À2 zR dLs ff u\s. ÄGñ dHJk³ ÄgQE fMG2 ÆÊ«Œ. LOMI f‹ d H äo 1P‹ à÷³ 2Í «5(V )« òÉt èM‹ 1ó Τ ª‹ z ,

(6) .Ñ  ê zR dL gÆ Ñ ÊéG 2 1P‹ { 3Í «5(Fe )ê äGñ zR dLs hò ÄgQ Œ. «³ ¯g zR dLs g G2 { «5« 2Í =³ h òê † f ÄU k³ ĕêŒ. ñDŠ ÄgQ { «5‹ é zJs ö(GD .Gñ {-)-”«T ôdís  G2) ) 1 « 3P 1®GŒ[5]. !¶Š 2͋ à÷³ )-”«TÍ Ë´À2 LOMI ffÑ ‹K { dí‹ ò Ägäo 4Ö ‹ äRsF ,}êŒ. V(Pic) + / Fe O +3HPic & 2-1. LOMI. 2+. 3+. − 3. 1. 2. 2 3. V(Pic)3+Fe(Pic)3− +11/2H++11/2OH−. Chemical name Water Sodium hydroxide Formic acid Picolinic acid Free metal ions Vanadium(II) complexes Vanadium(III) complexes Iron(II) complexes Iron(III) complexes. 2 )-”«T {«5s ÷Œ. fà_‹ ðD ªÑŠ ff‹ KÁ  ~o 2Í =¯ à÷³(II) T-) )-”«T, V(Pic) ôdí³Š, )”«T(Pic ) ¬ à÷³‹ P9Í 3:1z 6:1 p.ъ @ êŒ. )-”«T ¬ à÷³‹ P9Í 2.5:1 «G«

(7) à÷³(II) 9) )-”«T, V(Pic) Í ( J¯  ~« êŒ. f ÆÊ« Ü0æD )M‹ f ÄUÑ2 à÷³o ¤d à ÷³(III)‹ 9) )-”«T V(OH)(Pic) ê, dLъ ĕ ê {o {(II) T-) )-”«T Fe(Pic) , {(II) 9) )-” LOMI. − 3. −. 2. 2 − 3. Species H+, OHNa+, OHHCOOH, H+, COOHHPic, H+, PicV2+, V3+, Fe2+ V(Pic)1+, V(Pic)2, V(Pic)3V(Pic)12+, V(Pic)2+, V(Pic)3, V(OH)(Pic)2 Fe(Pic)1+, Fe(Pic)2, Fe(Pic)3These complexes do not exist to any significant extent during a LOMI decontamination. «T Fe(Pic) , {(II) Hô )-”«T Fe(Pic) Ù« c³ Ë´ ÀŒ[5]. Table 1Ñ LOMI f ÄUÑ ÊéO ¤ À2 ñ6 Í( Ü͋ dHÜs YɌ. LOMI fъ íÂ Ú ¤d÷TÝ o ÄU‹ pH à ÆQ Ú U£ ÄU òOs .g ÄêŒ. 2-2. _ã-ë-W§÷o¿ £ tŸW ` û ñ6  ~‹  Ú ôdf³ g æ2 ªÑŠ HÇ dH܋  ‰2 í0¤(R Ú  ¤R Ù ³w‹ ö_Rs T´Š ªO ¤ ÀŒ. « ªs .gŠ2 ÄU‹ pH à, ê ôdf ‹  ‰ Ú «Ë 䁋  ¤ à Ù« ½tæ´t KŒ.  ö_R‹ ªÑ2 í¯Ä ɝ Ú Dʋ ɝ 鳿s KÄGj lÄO ¤ ÀŒ[6, 7]. LOMI fà_ Jċ K(L ªÑŠ2 ÄUÑ Ë´À2 2Í ‹ à÷³ «5o H& { dí‹ hò ÄgäÑ Äæ´ 3Í =³ dæÉŒÊ Í_GŒ. q7G

(8) , òɳ -Ϊ‹ îé0Í dHfÑ ‹g zR æ( :‰´ fÆÊQ f f KÁ ~‹ Šs ÄgQ dí‹ ŠÝŒ êÁ« æ( :j f´GD AéÑ ff¯ à÷³ 2Í «5o M‹ H& Hæ´ 3Í =³ dî ¤ ÀŒ[5]. «2 fÄU‹ +j ¡d³‰ e ¯O ¤ À2), LOMI fà_ QÊ ªQ Ü0 ªÑŠ‹ pH à« ¡G à÷³ 2Í «5« Ë´À2 ðD fÄU‹ +« Ü 0 )MÑ2 3͋ à÷³ )-”«T‹ +k³ à`Œ[5, 8]. à÷ ³, { Ú )-”«T ôdf‹  Šo f ÄU  Ë´À2 H Ç «5܋ Y«‚³ 4ÖQ ç« í0¤(Rk³ ÷ ¤ ÀŒ. + 1. 2. [Vtotal]= [V3+]+[V(Pic)12+]+[V(Pic)2+]+[V(Pic)3]+[V(Pic)2(OH)] (2) [Fetotal]=[Fe2+]+[Fe(Pic)1+]+[Fe(Pic)2]+[Fe(Pic)−3 ] (3) 2+ + − [Pictotal]=[Pic ]+[HPic]+[V(Pic)1 ]+[2V(Pic)2 ]+[3V(Pic)3]+[2V(Pic)2(OH)] +[Fe(Pic)1+]+[2Fe(Pic)2]+[3Fe(Pic)3− ]. (1). Pic. Ÿ¤@¤ C43× C1ƒ 2005 2. Table 1. Ionic and undissociated soluble species in solution during a LOMI decontamination. (4). Table 2Ñ2 á ªÑ ÄK  äR Ú 8_‰ ¤ às ÷Ɍ. LOMI fÄU  Ë´À2 V(III)-)-”«T Ú Fe(II)-)-”«T ôdís ¯WK ñ6 Í( dHÜÑ ¬K Ä U  É02 éËъ »ÉŒ[9-11]. (2)-(4) í0¤(R Ú  ¤³z )-”«T ‰Ñ ¬K Rs 7ó Œ]Rk³ K‰O ¤ ÀɌ[12]. f ÄU y‹ «5Ü Ú -)-”«T ôdí ܋ ~S, ôdís  G( :o )-”«T ôdf‹ ‰2 V , Fe , Pic Ù Î  ~‹ ðD  ‰ à Ú ÄU pH às ½tGÊ ɝ 鳿s lÄGñ «·Jk³ ªGŒ[12]. total. total. total.

(9) -^«6 ôdí‹ U~ H. 35. Table 2. The Dissociation equilibria and pKa values [9-11]. :. Dissociation reactions HPic H++ Pic− V3++Pic− V(III)(Pic)2+ 1 − V(III)(Pic)2+ V(III)(Pic)2+ 1 + Pic V(III)(Pic)3 V(III)(Pic)2++Pic− V(III)(OH)(Pic)2+H+ V(III)(Pic)2++H2O Fe(II)(Pic)1+ Fe2++Pic− Fe(II)(Pic)2 Fe(II)(Pic)1++Pic− Fe(II)(Pic)3− Fe(II)(Pic)2+Pic−. : : : : : : :. 3.. pKa 5.21 5.72 6.56 4.07 2.66 4.90 4.10 3.30. ûG Z +{. fÆÆ« ³û † )-”«T ôdfQ ö   «5Ü« Ë ´À2 LOMI fÄUk³z ö   í0¯ Š «5Os Áê Jk³ ~-GD .gŠ2, )-”«T ôdfÍ Ë´À2 ÄU  «5܋ ôdí Ñ îK _ÝÍ À´t KŒ.  =Ñ À2 ôdí‹ ~ =õ  «5ê ôdf‹  ‰ Ú ÄU ‹ pH àk³z ªO ¤ ÀŒ. « ªo kÎ ÞÛG(O, Perrin Ú Sayce[6], Ingri Ù[13]« íèK COMICS«÷ HALTAFALL ً ɝ 鳿« kÎ KÄGŒ. á õgъ2 )-”« TÍ Ë´À2 fÄU ªÑ ¬Gñ «Q ço 鳿s Ä Ú ¤_Gñ ÄGŒ[12]. ³_

(10) ‹ à÷³(III), {(II) Ú )1 k³ «P´, LOMI f ÄUÑ2 ñ6 Í( «5Ü« Ë´Àk, pH Ù ÄU‹ ÆQ« ”¶(

(11) «5܋ ~ =Í ”¶,Œ. à÷³(III), {(II) Ú ) -”«T³ «P´, H1 ÄUъ ÄU‹ pH àê Æ s ¡ dQEÍ

(12) Š «5܋ ~ õ ªGñ ~ ˎk³ ÷ Ɍ. 3-1. +Ø W§÷o¿ ô¬ »¿£ `Ï{ ,k 3-1-1. V:Fe:Pic=1:0.8:6 H1 ÄU Ägê {‹ Š« à÷³‹ 50%õ ðêGÊ, )-”«T ¬ à ÷³‹ 9Í Ê ‰ )-”«T LOMI f‹ MJ¯ Æ ¯ 6:1 s K(G2 H1 ÄU ª‹ ~ ˎs ªGŒ. Fig. 1(a)2 à÷³ ‰Í 6 mM¯ ÄU‹ ª ’êõ à3k³ à÷³(III)-) -”«T ôdí‹ ~ õ pH‹ W¤³ Ê K ~ ˎ «Œ. Fig. 1(b)2 { ‰Í à÷³ ‰‹ 80%¯ 4.8 mM‹  ÎÑ pH‹ W¤³ 1 {(II)-)-”«T ôdí‹ ~ ˎ«Œ. à÷³ ‰Í 3 mM³ A à÷³(III)-)-”«T ôdí Ú { ‰Í 2.4 mM³ A {(II)-)-”«T ôdí‹ ~ Ë Žo Fig. 2Ñ YɌ. K, á øéÑ2 Y-( :I(O Ê ‰ ÆQъ‹ s e¯GD .Gñ à÷³ Ú {‹ ‰Í ÎÎ 10 mM Ú 8 mM³ ÍK ÄUÑ ¬K ~ ˎ‰ Ê G Œ. «Q ço ~ ˎk³z )-”«T ¬ ‹ P 9Í ³_K àk³ Ê_æ

(13) fÄU  ‹ ‰Í ”¶†‰ ~ ˎ‹ =Ñ2 à ó«Í ÇɌ. 3-1-2. V:Fe:Pic=1:x:6 H1 ÄU gê {‹ ‰Í à÷³ ‰‹ 50% «G¯ ÄUъ ÄU‹ Æ « ~ ˎ‹ =Ñ Âj2 s oÝIŒ. Fig. 3(a) 2 à÷³ ‰Í 6 mM¯ ÄUъ à÷³(III)-)-”«T‹ ~ ˎ«Ê, { ‰Í à÷³‹ 20%¯ 1.2 mM ÄUъ {. Fig. 1. Distribution diagram of vanadic-picolinate (a) and ferrous-picolinate complexes (b) in the high-picolinate model decontamination solution. V3+=6 mM, Fe2+=4.8 mM, Picolinate=36 mM.. Fig. 2. Distribution diagram of vanadic-picolinate (a) and ferrous-picolinate complexes (b) in the high-picolinate model decontamination solution. V3+=3 mM, Fe2+=2.4 mM, Picolinate=18 mM. Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 43, No. 1, February, 2005.

(14) [CÝö1ò,ö6ÜÄ. 36. Fig. 3. Distribution diagram of vanadic-picolinate (a) and ferrous-picolinate complexes (b) in the high-picolinate model decontamination solution. V3+=6 mM, Fe2+=1.2 mM, Picolinate=36 mM.. Ë´À{s < ¤ ÀŒ. ¤«5(H )s WKK Š«5Gh ¤(@k³ f Us ê Q  Î ¤(@‹ ŽÑŠ ÄU  ÷TÝ «5« ÏI ¯4æ

(15) Š Š«5 ¤(@ъ ¤«5« ©´† ÷Q ÄU‹ pH às Yó ÝQÿÊ «³ ¯g  ôdí« +1Í 2 +2͋ Š« 5 Ük³ ¡Gñ ¤(@Ñ ¯4æ f Uk³z fMêŒ. 3-2. KØ W§÷o¿ ô¬g `Ï{ ,k 3-2-1. V:Fe:Pic=1:0.8:3 H1 ÄU )-”«T ¬ à÷³‹ ‰9Í 3:1¯ I ‰ )-”«T H1 ÄUs à÷³ Ú { )-”«T ôdí‹ ~ H õ .g Ž_GŒ[3]. LOMI fъ I ‰‹ )-”«T ÄU s ÄG2 «K2 è@æ2 Dí

(16) s k«2 ) IJ« ÀŒ. )1 ‹ Šs ¬,J¯ Ê ‰ )-”«T LOMI f ÆQ ъ ÄG2 Š‹ u 50%³ kk, à÷³ ‰‹ 50% « Ñ g¢æ2 {« õ2ŒÊ _GŒ. Fig. 4(a)Ñ2 à÷³ ‰Í 6 mM³ A à÷³(III)-)-”« T ôdí‹ ~ ˎs ÷ÉÊ, Fig. 4(b)Ñ2 { ‰Í 4.8 mM³ A(à÷³‹ 80%)Ñ ¬Gñ {(II)-)-”«T‹  ~ ˎs YɌ. à÷³ ‰Í 3 mM³ A à÷³(III)-)-”«T ôdí‹ ~ ˎê { ‰Í à÷³‹ 80%¯ 2.4 mM³ A {(II)-) -”«T‹ ~ ˎ‰ gGŒ. à÷³ Ú {‹ ‰õ 10 mM Ú 8 mM³ ÎÎ ¯ ÄU‹ ~ ˎs Fig. 5Ñ ÷Ɍ. «Q ç« Ê K Fig. 4 Ú Fig. 5‹ ~ ˎs 9GG. )-”«T‹ ~ ˎo Fig. 3(b)Ñ ÷Ɍ. «Q ç« Ägê {‹ ‰Í s  ÎÑ2 ~ ˎ‹ =Í uÑ ”¶›k÷ fÆÊ‹ hòÄgÑ ‹g ĕê { ‰‹ ¡ dÑ !ñ ~ ˎ‹ &Ã6, ó«2 ÇɌ. Fig. 1-3Ñ ÷ aê ç« f ÆÊ‹ Ü0 QYъ ÄU‹ pH ào 4-5‹ p.Ñ À2) « f ÄUÑ2 à÷³o c³ ¤ d à÷³(III)‹ 9) )-”«T V(OH)(Pic) ê, dLъ ĕê {o c³ {(II) T-) )-”«T Fe(Pic) Í ÎÎ 70% 8´k³ Ë´À{s å ¤ ÀŒ. f U‹ s-õ .Gñ «5 Gh ÆÊ« Q« Äæ´ f2), f Ü0Q à÷³ Ú { ) -”«T ôdío MGõ ˜( :M÷ { MGõ ˜Ê Àk÷ «Ë ôdí« Ë´À2 f ÄUs Š«5Gh ¤(@s êQ  Î à÷³ Ú {‹ ¬z~« ¤(@Ñ ¯4æ´ ¤(@s êg ÷5 ÄUÑ2 M‹ Ç{s «Â Y×s g e¯GŒ[12, 14]. «fb( MGõ ˜( :M÷ { MGõ ˜Ê À2 ôdí‹ Š «5Gh ä  o ’GDÍ ( :IŒ. 6÷ á õgÑ Š Ê K Fig. 1-3‹ ~ ˎk³z «Ë Š«5Gh ä  s eGj ’O ¤ ÀŒ. ~ ˎъ å ¤ À׫ ÄU‹ pH à« Ê42Ñ !¶ ÄU  ( J¯  ~‹ ôdí  =‰ Yó Š‹ GMs ˜2 ôdí³ ¡dKŒ. f UÑ s ƒÍGñ ¤«5(H )s YY ÍQÿ

(17)  ôdís «PÊ À2 )-”«T {«5« ©´† ÷Q )1 (HPic)s @  G

(18) Š  ôdío Š‹ GM¤Í Yó ÍKŒ. «Q ç« G ñ ÄU‹ pH à« u 1.5¯ òъ c³ Ë´À2  ôdí o à÷³‹  Î V(Pic) «Ê {‹  Î Fe(Pic) Ú Fe Í ä. Fig. 4. Distribution diagram of vanadic-picolinate (a) and ferrous-picolinate complexes (b) in the low-picolinate model decontamination solution. V3+=6 mM, Fe2+=4.8 mM, Picolinate=18 mM.. +. (II)-. 2. − 3. +. + 2. Ÿ¤@¤ C43× C1ƒ 2005 2. + 1. 2+.

(19) -^«6 ôdí‹ U~ H. 37. Fig. 5. Distribution diagram of vanadic-picolinate (a) and ferrous-picolinate complexes (b) in the low-picolinate model decontamination solution. V3+=10 mM, Fe2+=8 mM, Picolinate=30 mM.. Fig. 6. Distribution diagram of vanadic-picolinate (a) and ferrous-picolinate complexes (b) in the low-picolinate model decontamination solution. V3+=6 mM, Fe2+=3 mM, Picolinate=18 mM.. s A I ‰ )-”«T Æ ‹ H1 ÄU‹ ~ ˎo ‹ ‰ ¡dÑ îÇ«  =2 - ¿j ¡dG( :I Œ. 6÷ )-”«T‹ Šs à÷³ ‰‹ 6 (Ê ‰)ъ 3 (I ‰)³ ks AÑ2 ~ ˎ‹ =Í Q« ¡G Œ. à÷³(III)-)-”«T ôdí‹  Î à÷³ T-) )”«T, V(Pic) Ñ g¢G2 )¿Í ¿j k´ËɌ. {(II)-)”«T ôdí‹ ~ ˎ‰ =Í ¿j ¡GŒ. I ‰ ) -”«T ÆQ‹ H1 ÄUъ {(II) ôdí «5܋ ~ =2 pH 4 « ‹ òъ2 M‹ ³_K 9Ss K(GÊ ÀŒ. {‹ ~ ˎ« ¿j ¡K «K2 ÄU‹ pH à« ÍG

(20) ¶‰ {(II) «5ê ôdís «X ¤ À2 )-”«T‹ Š« ¬Jk³ zÇGD Aék³ @ÎêŒ. 3-2-2. V:Fe:Pic=1:x:3 H1 ÄU Ägê {‹ ‰Í à÷³ ‰‹ 50% «G¯ H1 ÄUъ Fig. 6(a)2 à÷³ ‰Í 6 mM³ A gK à÷³(III)-)-”« T ôdí‹ ~ ˎ«Ê, Fig. 6(b)2 { ‰Í à÷³‹ 50%¯ 3 mM³ A gK {(II)-)-”«T ôdí‹ ~ « Œ. K, Fig. 7Ñ2 à÷³ ‰2 6 mM«÷, { ‰Í 1.2 mM ³ { ‰Í à÷³ ‰‹ 20%³ kÎ o ÄUъ gK à÷ ³(III)-)-”«T Ú {(II)-)-”«T ôdí‹ ~ Ë Žs YɌ. {(II)-)-”«T ôdí‹ ~ ˎo Fig. 4(b), Fig. 6(b) Ú Fig. 7(b)ъ  =Í Š³ ŒíŒ. 6÷ à÷³ «5܋ ~ ˎo K K =õ ÝñcÊ ÀŒ. I ‰ )-”« T LOMI ÆQ‹ H1 ÄUъ {(II)-)-”«T ôdí‹ . Fig. 7. Distribution diagram of vanadic-picolinate (a) and ferrous-picolinate complexes (b) in the low-picolinate model decontamination solution. V3+=6 mM, Fe2+=1.2 mM, Picolinate=18 mM.. 3. Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 43, No. 1, February, 2005.

(21) [CÝö1ò,ö6ÜÄ. 38. ~ 2 {‹ ‰Ñ ¿j ‹ÊKŒ. Fig. 6(b)Q ç« { ‰Í à ÷³‹ 50%¯  Î‹ ~ ˎo à÷³‹ 80%¯ Fig. 4(b)Q 9 Gg ÝIs A ÄU‹ pH à« ÍWÑ !¶ {(II) «5Ñ ¬K )-”«T‹ Š« ¬Jk³ ÍGñ 8_K {(II)-)-” «T ôdís  Ws < ¤ ÀŒ. { ‰õ à÷³‹ 20%³

(22) Ï 

(23) {Ñ ¬K )-”«T‹ ¬J¯ Š«

(24) Ï ÍGñ Fig. 7(b)ъ Ý׫ Fe(Pic) Q ço ôdí‹ Š« c³ @ ê Œ. «Q ç« {(II)-)-”«T ~ ˎ« ¡dæ2  o ÄUÑ Ë´À2 {Ñ 9g )-”«T ôdf‹ ¬J¯ Š ‹ zÇÑ D¯G2 ak³ ’·Jk³ Sg Table 2Ñ ÷ à ÷³(III) Ú {(II) «5Ü« )-”«T ôdís  G2 8_ ‰ ¤(stability constant)‹ ó«ÑŠ 9ÇêŒ. − 3. 4.. û «. )-”«T ôdfÍ Ë´À2 f Uъ à÷³ Ú { « 5܋ ~ MŸs pH àê Æ « Œñ ñ6 ÆQъ H. GŒ. Ê ‰ )-”«T LOMI ÆQъ )-”«T ¬ à÷³‹ P9õ ³_K àk³ K(O  Î  «5‹ ‰ ¡dщ ‚ gGÊ ~ ˎ‹ =2 ¿j ”¶(( :IŒ. I ‰ ) -”«T LOMI ÆQ‹ H1 ÄUъ‰  «5 ‰ ¡d‹  o K GŒ. 6÷ I ‰ )-”«T ÆQ‹ ÄUъ2 { (II)-)-”«T‹ ~ ˎ‹ =Í ¿j ¡dG2), « Q ço  o ÄUÑ Ë´À2 {Ñ ¬K )-”«T‹ ¬J ¯ Š« zÇGD AéÑ ³´÷ à÷³(III) Ú {(II) «5Ü« ) -”«T ôdís  G2 8_‰ ¤(stability constant)‹ ó« ъ 9ÇêŒ. á õgъ gK ~ ˎo «5Gh ÆÊê ço LOMI f U‹ s- ê_ъ ÄU‹ ÆQ ¡dÑ !ñ ä   s +GM÷ «gG2) kÎ KÄGj lÄî ¤ ÀŒ.. ƒ+S 1. Davis, M. S., “The Impact of LWR Decontamination on Solidification, Waste Disposal and Associated Occupational Exposure,” NUREG/CR-3444, 2(1985). 2. Boles, J. S., Ritchie, K. and Crerar, D. A., “Reducing the Poten-. Ÿ¤@¤ C43× C1ƒ 2005 2. tial for Migration of Radioactive Waste: Aqueous Thermal Degradation of the Chelating Agent Disodium EDTA,” Nucl. Chem. Waste Manag., 7, 89-93(1987). 3. Kotrly, S. and Sucha, L., Handbook of Chemical Equilibria in Analytical Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York(1985). 4. Macasek, F. and Navratil, J. D., Separation Chemistry, Ellis Horwood, New York(1992). 5. Bradbury, D., Segal, M. G., Sellers, R. M., Swan, T. and Wood, C. J., “Development of LOMI Chemical Decontamination Technology,” EPRI NP-3177(1983). 6. Perrin, D. D. and Sayce, I. G., “Computer Calculation of Equilibrium Concentrations in Mixtures of Metal Ions and Complexing Species,” Talanta, 14, 833-842(1967). 7. Dyrssen, D., Jagner, D. and Wengelin, F., Computer Calculation of Ionic Equilibria and Titration Procedures: with Specific Reference to Analytical Chemistry, p. 66, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm; Wiley, New York(1968). 8. Shim, J. B., Oh, W. Z., Lee, B. J., Park, H. S. and Kim, J. D., “Electrodialysis of Vanadium(III) and Iron(II) Ions from a Simulated Decontamination Solution,” Sep. Sci. and Tech., 34, 1963(1999). 9. Powell, J. E. and Ingemanson, J. W., Inorganic Chemistry, 7, 2459(1968). 10. Lannon, A. M., Lappin, A. G. and Segal, M. G., “Redox Reactions of Some Iron(II), Iron(III), and Cobalt(III) Picolinate Complexes,” J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 619-624(1986). 11. Sillen, L. G. and Martell, A. E., Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes, Special Publication No. 17, The Chemical Society, Burlington House, London(1964). 12. Shim, J. B., “Study on the Regeneration of the Decontamination Liquid Waste Containing V-Fe-Picolinate Complexes by the Resin-Filled Electrodialysis,” Ph.D. Dissertation, KAIST, Daejeon(1999). 13. Ingri, N., Kakolowicz, W., Sillen, L. G. and Warnqvist, B., Talanta, 14, 1261(1967). 14. Shim, J. B., Park, S. Y., Moon, J. K., Oh, W. Z. and Kim, J. D., “Study on the Regeneration of Decontamination Waste Solution Containing V(III)-Fe(II)-Picolinate Complexes in the Cation Exchange Resin Bed (I); Characteristics of Cation Exchange Reaction,” Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Pohang, Korea, 2, 807(1994)..

(25)

참조

관련 문서

Therefore, in this study, the conditions and problems of wind instrument programs of various junior high schools in the Gwangju region were analyzed

Relationship between soil pH and phosphatase activity in volcanic ash soil of citrus orchards on the different surface soil management practices at

The revised Korean music textbook in 2007 of 1st grade in middle school covers various parts of Korean music compared to the past. Especially, creative Korean music has been

In conclusion, the growth and yield of potato was not different between mixed fertilizer(chemical fertilizer : liquid pig manure = 1:1) and the

This research might enlarge application of ionic liquid in chemical processes by providing color change mechanism of imidazolium based ionic liquids according

Figure 15 Tensile strength and modulus values for the MB-CNTFs after (a) chemical functionalization of the CNT surface with 4-iodoaniline under acidic

1 John Owen, Justification by Faith Alone, in The Works of John Owen, ed. John Bolt, trans. Scott Clark, &#34;Do This and Live: Christ's Active Obedience as the

By plotting a series of the free energy-composition curves at different temperatures we established the manner in which the phase compositions changes with temperature. In