< 단행본 >
김종원. 2000.「효율적 물 관리를 위한 수리권 거래제도」. 물 위기의 시대- 우리나라의수자원정책, 환경정의시민연대 엮음.
김종원・여형범. 2000. 「수리권 거래제도 도입방안 연구」, 건설교통부
이창희외 공저. 1999. 「물자원의 효율적 이용을 위한 유역관리 방안 - 낙동강 수계관리를 중심으로」.
한국환경정책・평가연구원.
정회성, 강철구. 1997. 「환경행정의 선진화 방안」, 한국환경정책 평가연구원 환경부 국정감사 보고서. 2000. 「낙동강 물관리대책의 개선방안」
한국수자원학회, 한국행정연구원. 1998. 「우리나라의 발전적인 물 관리체계구축 방안」
영국하천청. 1993. 「영국의 수자원 정책.
동아시아의 환경평화에 관한 국제회의. 2000. 「유럽 라인강 유역 사례」
Beaton, W. P. 1988. The Cost of Government Regulations. Vol. 2. Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Commission. Annapolis, MD.
Heathcote, Isobel W. 1998. Integrated Watershed Management - Principles and Practice. John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.
Hofwegen, Paul J.M. van. Frank G.W.Jaspers. 1999. Analytical Framework for Integrated Water Resources Management - Guidelines for Assessment of Institutional Frameworks. A.A Balkema/Rotterdam/Brookfield.
IDB. 1997. Integrated Water Resources Management: Strategy Background Paper, Washington.
James L. Wescoat, Jr. 1984. Integrated Water Development - Water Use and Conservation Practice in Western Colorado
Lord, W.B. and M. Israel. 1996. A proposed strategy t encourage and facilitate improved water resources management in Latin America and Caribbean. IDB Washington.
Ministry of Natural Resources Ontario. 1993. "Subwatershed Planning"
Mitchell, Bruce. 1990. Integrated Water Management - International Experiences and Perspectives.
Belhaven Press.
Murray-Darling Watershed Commission. 2000. "Integrated Catchment Management In The Murray "
Policy Research Proj ect Report. 1993. Implementing Watershed Management Texas. The University of Texas at Austin.
Rattan Lal. 2000. Integrated Watershed Management in The Global Ecosystem. CRC Press.
Savenij e H. 1997. Concepts and Tools for Integrated Water Resources Management, IHE Delf.
Schueler, Tom. 1995a. The Economics of Watershed Protection, Center for Watershed Protection.
Vaj peyi, Dhirendra K. 1998. Water Resource Management - A Comprehensive Perspective. Prager.
Weyerhauser Company. 1989. The Value of Landscaping. Weyerhauser Nursery Products Division.
Tacoma, WA.
< 논 문 >
Brown, W. 1996. Towards a Balanced Monitoring Budget. Watershed Protection Techniques Vol. 2.
No 1.pp. 338-344.
Butcher, Jonathan B. 1999. "Forecasting Future Land Use for Watershed Assessment". Journal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation Vol. 35. pp 555-566. American Water Resources Association.
Cortese, Charles F. 1999. "The Social Context of Western Water Development". Journal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation Vol 35. pp 567-578. American Water Resources Association.
Ewing, Sarah. 1999. "Landcare and Community-Led Watershed Management in Victoria, Australia".
Journal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation Vol. 35. pp 663-674. American Water Resources Association.
Firth, Penny . 1999. "The Importance of Water Resources Education for the Next Century". Journal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation Vol. 35. pp 487-492. American Water Resources Association.
Griffin, C. B. 1999. "Watershed Councils : An Emerging Form of Public Participation in Natural Resource Management". J ournal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation Vol. 35. pp 505-518. American Water Resources Association.
Grigg, Neil S. 1999. Integrated Water Resources Management: Who Should Lead, Who Should Pay?".
Journal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation Vol. 35. pp 527-534. American Water Resources Association.
Harrington, Keith W. Timothy D. Feather, and Gary R. Clark. 1999. "State Water Law Reform:
Identifying Legal and Managerial Issues and Options". J ournal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation. Vol. 35. pp 545-554. American Water Resources Association.
Kirby, K. 1993. Wetland Not Wastelands. Scenic A merica Technical Inf ormation Series Vol. 1. pp.1-8.
Letey, J. 1999. "Science and Policy in Integrated Watershed Management : A Case Study". Journal of The American Water Resources Association Vol. 35. pp 603-608. American Water Resources Association.
Morales, D.J. 1980. "The Contribution of Trees to Residential Property Values". Journal of A rboriculture. Vol..6. pp. 30 1-302.
Mcdonald, Lisa A. and Grace M. Johns. 1999. "Integrating Social Benefit Cost Accounting Into Watershed Restoration and Protection Programs". J ournal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation. Vol. 35. pp 579-592. American Water Resources Association.
Michelsen, Ari M., J. Thomas McGuckin, and Donna Stumpf. 1999. "Nonprice Water Conservation Programs as a Demand Management Tool". J ournal of The A merican Water R esources
A ssociation. Vol. 35. pp 593-602. American Water Resources Association.
Mullen, Michael William and Bruce E. Allison. 1999. "Stakeholder Involvement and Social Capital:
Keys to Watershed Management Success in Alabama". Journal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation. Vol. 35. pp 655-662. American Water Resources Association.
Ruhl, J. B. 1999. "The Political Science of Watershed Management in the Ecosystem Age". J ournal of The A merican Water R esources A ssociation. Vol. 35. pp 519-526. American Water Resources Association.
Schueler, Tom. 1995b . Crafting Better Urban Watershed Protection Plans, Watershed Protection Techniques Vol. 2, N o. 2, Center for Watershed Protection.
Schwerdtfeger, Peter and Mr David Wotton. 1997. "The Murray-Darling River Basin - From A Critical South Australian Perspective". A TSE Focus, No.96
< 인터넷 자료 >
미국 EPA 유역 보호 홈페이지 http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/statewide http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/framework 맑은 물 활동 계획 홈페이지 http://www.cleanwater.gov
텍사스 Brazos 하천 당국 홈페이지 http://www.brazos.org
캐나다 그랜드 강 보존 위원회 홈페이지 http://www.grandriver.on.ca/grca 영국 환경부 홈페이지 http://www.environment-agency.go.uk
영국 웨일즈 환경부 홈페이지 http://www.environment-agency.wales.gov.uk 라인강 ICPR 홈페이지 http://www.iksr.org/icpr
호주 무레이-다링 유역 홈페이지 http://www.mdbc.gov.au
호주 웨스턴 시드니 대학 통합 유역관리 센터 http://life.csu.edu.au/esa/esa97/papers
ABSTRACT
A Study for Integrated Wate rs hed Ma nage me nt Syste m in Korea
by Chongwon K im
The importance of water resources management is growing in Korea as well as in foreign countries. In the past, w ater management was sub-sectoral, m ostly in relation to w ater supply, irrigation and flood control. There is a growing consensus that integrated w atershed m anagem ent is necessary for sustainable use of water resource for all interests and protection of the environm ent. Integrated watershed m anagement is the management of surface and subsurface water in quantitative, qu alitative and ecological sense from a multi disciplinary perspective and focused on the needs and requirements of society at large regarding w ater.
The primary objective of this study is to propose a desirable integrated watershed m anagem ent system in Korea. To attain this prim ary objective, constitutional, organizational and operational functions should be well established. Based on these three criteria, the current Korean watershed management system are evaluated by the three sectors(water use, flood control and environment of watershed). The evaluation results show that there are some degree of differences among the sectors, but, in general, current w atershed management system are far behind to implement integrated watershed m anagem ent.
Case studies of integrated watershed m anagement in the foreign countries show that integrated watershed management is still its infancy and there is still much to achieve with its implementation . Suggestions of case studies are as follows: First, the m anagem ent of watershed are initiated by river authorities and central governm ents provide financial aid, guideline, technical assistance. Second, current issues for integrated watershed m anagem ent are most focused on water quality and ecological aspect of river environment.
Third, watershed planning is not an event planning but are cyclical planning including m onitoring and evaluation . Fourth, all kind of stakeholders participation are ensured by
law and institution in the establishment and implem entation of watershed planning.
This study proposes three steps to reach a desirable integrated watershed managem ent.
First step is to strive for sectoral integration at river basin within current system . Second step is to establish river commission . River commission is constituted of relevant central and local governm ent representative officers. Third step is to establish river authority independent of central governm ent. This river authority identifies major issues of w atershed, develops projects and implement and m onitor the integrated watershed m anagem ent plans with participation of interest groups.
If integrated watershed m anagem ent plan can be implem ented step by step as explained above, function for project implementation can be transferred from central to local governments. At the sam e time, plans suitable for each w atershed can be established.