• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

참고문헌

건강보험심사평가원. 「독일․프랑스 심사기관 방문결과 보고서」 건강보험심사평가원, 2003.

건강보험심사평가원. 「미국 의료의 질 평가기관 방문 보고서」 건강보험심사평가원, 2003.

건강보험심사평가원. 「건강보험심사평가원 기능과 역할」 건강보험심사평가원, 2010.

공공기관의 개인정보보호에 관한 법률 [시행 2010. 3.22] [법률 제10142호, 2010. 3.22, 일 부개정], [시행 2010. 5. 5] [법률 제10012호, 2010. 2. 4, 타법개정]

국민건강보험법 시행령」제28조제2항 및「국민건강보험법 시행규칙」제14조 제1항 규정에 의한 요양급여비용 심사청구 소프트웨어의 검사 등에 관한 기준(보건복지가족부 고시 제2009-53호, 2009.3.23)

김동숙, 변진옥, 김수경, 이병란, 장선미, 박춘선, 장성재. 「약제급여 적정성 평가 개선방안 연구 - 처방지표를 중심으로」 건강보험심사평가원, 2009.

김동숙, 이숙향, 정진희, 허순임. 「노인의 PID(potentially inappropriate drugs) 사용양상 연구」

건강보험심사평가원, 2008.

김동숙. 외국의 처방점검 제도와 처방지표 고찰. HIRA 정책동향 제4권 3호, 2010.05~06.

김재용. 「주요국의 의료서비스 관리기관」 In. 조사연구자료집 I, 건강보험심사평가원, 2005 박종혁, 우리나라 동료심사제도의 현황 및 발전방향 - 미국, 유럽의 동료심사 활동 사례를

중심으로, 서울대 의료관리학교실 QA 세미나, 2003

배승진, 임민경. 「해외 약제 심사제도 고찰」 건강보험심사평가원, 2008 배승진. 미국의 의료 전산 지원제도 고찰. HIRA 정책동향 제3권 3호, 2009. 5

백진이. 임상결정지원시스템의 국내 활용 방안, 숙명여자대학교 임상약학대학원[2008] [국 내석사].

보건복지가족부 고시 제2008- 6호(2008.3.27), 보건복지부 고시 제2007-120호(2007.12.17) 보건의료기본법[시행 2010. 3.19] [법률 제9932호, 2010. 1.18, 타법개정]

서울대학교 산학협력단. 「G5국가의 의료심사평가제도」, 서울대학교 산학협력단, 건강보험 심사평가원 용역보고서, 2008.

숙대 의약정보연구소. 「전산화 DUR 시스템을 통한 국민건강보험 약제비 심사 효율성 향상 방안에 대한 연구」. 숙대 의약정보연구소, 건강보험심사평가원 용역보고서, 2003.

식품의약품안전청, 의약품 적정사용정보 지원방안 계획, 2006.

심사청구소프트웨어 검사 등에 관한 기준 (복지부 고시) 약사법 제26조제2항

요양급여 적용기준 및 방법에 관한 세부사항 (복지부 고시)

요양급여의 적용기준 및 방법에 관한 세부사항(보건복지가족부 고시 제2009- 29호, 2009.3.3) 의료법 제18조제4항

이의경, 김철환, 류시원, 허지행, 강주호, 이지현, 강숙현. 「2단계 의약품 처방조제 지원시 스템 시범사업 평가 연구」 숙명여자대학교, 건강보험심사평가원 용역보고서, 2010.

이진용, 동료심사, 서울대 의료관리학교실 QA 세미나, 2004

이한주, 임지혜, 김록영, 이선희. 「의료이용정보 공유에 대한 해외사례 고찰」 건강보험심사 평가원, 2009.

퍼스트디스. 「의료급여 환자별 의약품 적정사용 실태조사」 퍼스트디스, 건강보험심사평가원 용역보고서, 2006.

퍼스트디스. 「의약품 다품목 원외처방의 안전성 등 판단을 위한 분석」 퍼스트디스, 건강 보험심사평가원 용역보고서, 2007.

AlbertaNetcare, Using the Pharmaceutical Information Network (PIN) in a Clinical Setting, July 2007.

Available at http://www.posp.ab.ca/media/50257/pin%20in% 20a%20clinical%20setting.pdf Anderson MJ, Spivack BS, Soumerai SB, et al. Pharmaceutical Benefits Managers and

Optimizing Prescribing. JAMA 1999;281:1168-.

Armstrong EP, Markson TJ. On-line DUR messages: pharmacists' attitudes and actions in response. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1997 May-Jun;NS37(3):315-20.

Armstrong EP, Denemark CR. How pharmacists respond to on-line, real-time DUR alerts. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1998 Mar-Apr;38(2):149-54.

Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen DJ et al. The Costs of Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA 1997; 277: 307-311.

참고문헌 • 145

Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM, Burdick E, Hickey M, Kleefield S, Shea B, Vander Vliet M, Seger DL. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.

JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311-6.

Campbell SM. et al. Prescribing indicators for UK general practice: delphi consultation study.

BMJ 2000; 321: 425-428.

Christensen DB, Holmes G, Fassett WE, Neil N, Andrilla CH, Smith DH, Andrews A, Bell EJ, Hansen RW, Shafer R, Stergachis A. Influence of a financial incentive on cognitive services: CARE project design/implementation. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash).

1999 Sep-Oct;39(5):629-39.

Chrischilles EA, Fulda TR, Byrns PJ, Winckler SC, Rupp MT, Chui MA.. The role of pharmacy computer systems in preventing medication errors. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002 May-Jun;42(3):439-48.

CMS. Towards an Evaluation Framework for Electronic Health Records: An inventory of Electronic Health Records Initiatives Across Canada, March 2004

Code of Federal Regulation, CFR Title 42 Part 456(Utilization Control). available at:

http://law.justia.com/us/cfr/title42/42cfr456_main_02.html

Craig RT. Centralized DUR and Prescription Management, 2008 대한약학회 추계학술대회:

한국약료경영학회 창립기념 심포지움, 2008.10.24

Einarson TR. Drug-related hospital admissions. Ann Pharmacother 1993; 27: 832-840.

Ernst FR, Grizzle AJ. Drug-related morbidity and mortality: updating the cost-of-illness model.

J Am Pharm Assoc 2001; 41: 192-199.

Erwin WG, The definition of drug utilization review: statement of issues, Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991;50(5 Pt 2):569-9.

Express Script. Drug Trend Report, 2007.

Garg AX, Adhikan NJK, McDonald H. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review.

JAMA 2005; 293(10): 1223-1238.

Green Shield, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, April 2002; TELUS, Drug Utilization Review.

Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. A conceptual framework for constructing prescribing quality indicators:

a proposal In DUROQUIM: Drug Utilisation Research Quality Indicator Meeting(13-15 May 2004). Jointly organized by WHO Regional office for Europe, EuroDRUG and RIZIV

Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. A conceptual framework for constructing prescribing quality indicators:

a proposal In DUROQUIM: Drug Utilisation Research Quality Indicator Meeting(13-15 May 2004). Jointly organized by WHO Regional office for Europe, EuroDRUG and RIZIV

Hallas J, Haghfelt T, Gram LF et al. Drug related admissions to a cardiology department:

Frequency and avoidability. J Intern Med 1990; 228: 379-384.

Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008;77:291-304.

Health Canada. Introduction to Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) Drug Benefits List, April 2009. Available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/nihb-ssna/index-eng.php

Health Canada. Drug Utilization Evaluation Bulletin, Sep 2005. Available at http://www.hc-sc.

gc.ca/fniah-spnia/pubs/nihb-ssna/_drug-med/2005_09_due-eum/index-eng.php

Health Canada. Drug Utilization Evaluation Bulletin, Sep 2008. Available at http://www.hc-sc.

gc.ca/fniah-spnia/alt_formats/fnihb-dgspni/pdf/pubs/nihb-ssna/2008-due-bulletin_eng.pdf Health Canada. Introduction to Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) Drug Benefits List, April 2009.

Available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/nihb-ssna/provide-fournir/pharma-prod/med-list/

introduction-eng.php#a8

Health Canada. Non-Insured Health Benefits for First Nations and Inuit. Available at http://www.

nlchi.nf.ca/pdf/Initiatives_mar04.pdf

Hennessy S, Bilker WB, Zhou L, Weber AL, Brensinger C, Wang Y, Strom BL.. Retrospective drug utilization review, prescribing errors, and clinical outcomes. JAMA. 2003 Sep 17;290(11):1494-9.

Hennessy S, Soumerai SB, Lipton HL, Strom BL. Chagper 29. Drug Utilization Review. In Strom BL, Pharmacoepidemiology 4th Ed. University of Pennsylvania, 2005.

IHA(Integrated Healthcare Association). available at: http://www.iha.org/

참고문헌 • 147

Institute of Medicine, To err is human: Building a safer health system 2000, National Academy Press, 2000.

Jha AK, Kuperman GJ, Rittenberg E, Teich JM, Bates DW. Identifying hospital admissions due to adverse drug events using a computer-based monitor. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10:113-119.

Kidder D, Bae J. Evaluation results from prospective drug utilization review: Medicaid demonstrations. Health Care Financing Review 1999; 20(3): 107-118.

Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA.1998; 279: 1200-1205.

Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients:

Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991; 324(6):377-384.

Medco Health Solution, 2001.

Medco Health Solution, Drug Trend Report: Predictions, 2008.

Medco Health Solution. Sweden's Apoteket develop prescription safety program, 2010년 1월 7일 (Accessed at http://www.medcohealth.com/medco/corporate/ home.jsp?ltSess=y&articleID=

CorpAlertMedco_Apoteket_Safety_Program) Medco. Drug Trend Report: Predictions, 2008.

Mjorndal T, Boman MD, Hagg S, et al. Adverse drug reactions as a cause for admissions to a department of internal medicine. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11: 6572.

Monane M, Matthias DM, Nagle BA, et al. Improving Prescribing Patterns for the Elderly Through an Online Drug Utilization Review Intervention: A System Linking the Physician, Pharmacist, and Computer, JAMA. 1998;280(14):1249-1252

National Prescribing Center, available at: www.npc.co.uk National Prescribing Service, available at: www.nps.org.au

National Prescribing Service. Indicators of Quality Prescribing in Australian General Practice:

A manual for suers, 2006

NHS Employers. Quality and Outcomes Framework guidance for GMS contract 2009/10, March 2009.

NHS, Practice based commissioning: practical implementation, 2006.

- Practice Based Commissioning in Warrington, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10 - Brighton and Hove, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10

- Coventry PCO, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2008/2009 - Eastern and Coastal kent, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10 - Halton PCT, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2008/10

- Leicester, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10

- NHS North of Tyne, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10 - Northamptonshire PCT, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2008/2009 - Oxfordshire, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10

- South East Essex PCT, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10 - South Staffordshire, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10 - Warrington , Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10 - Wales, Prescribing Incentive Scheme 2009/10 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act ‘90 (OBRA '90)

Schiff GD, Rucker TD. Computerized prescribing: building the electronic infrastructure for better medication usage. JAMA. 1998 Apr 1;279(13):1024-9.

Shield G. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, April 2002. Available at http://www.greenshield.ca/NR/rdonlyres/B544E5A7-7453-4D0B-A196-90829F12C77C/0/Ad vocacyRomanowSubmissionApril2002CompleteEn.pdf

Strand LM, Morley PC, Cipolle RJ, Ramsey R, Lamsam GD. Drug-related problems: their structure and function, Annal of Pharmacotherapy 1990; 24(11): 1093-1097.

TELUS. Drug Utilization Review. Available at http://telushealth.com/en/solutions/ assure_

claims/drug/drug_utilization_review.aspx

TkMC. Program Evaluation of Alberta Management Committee on Drug Utilization (AMCDU) / Alberta Drug Utilization Program (ADUP). June 6, 2005. Available at http://www.cadth.ca/

media/compus/cac_review/Jan_2007/Appendix%2037A%20-%20ADUP%20Final%20Evalu ation%20Report.pdf

Towards an Evaluation Framework for Electronic Health Records: An inventory of Electronic Health Records Initiatives Across Canada, March 2004. Available at

참고문헌 • 149

University of Manitoba, Population Health Research Data Repository: Drug Database, Last updated December 18, 2009.

University of Manitoba, Population Health Research Data Repository: Drug Database, Last updated December 18, 2009. Available at http://www.umanitoba.ca/ faculties/medicine/

units/mchp/resources/repository/health_drug.html

Wertheimer AI. Quality control and drug utilization review, Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition 1988;10:154-157.

Ǻstrand B, Montelius E, Petersson G, Ekedahl A. Assessment of ePrescription quality: an observational study at three mail-order pharmacies. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2009:8.

Ǻstrand B, Prescriptions minus the paper, Public Service Review: European Union - Issue 16, Sep 11 2008. (Accessed at http://www.publicservice.co.uk/article.asp? publication=

European%20Union&id=353&content_name=Medical%20Information%20and%20E-Health

&article=10403)

Strom BL, Pharmacoepidemiology 2005, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

- Strom BL. Chatper 13. Overview of automated database in pharmacoepidemiology. In Strom BL, Pharmacoepidemiology 4th Ed. University of Pennsylvania, 2005.

- Chan AK. et al., Chatper 16. The HMO Research Network. In Strom BL, Pharmacoepidemiology 4th Ed. University of Pennsylvania, 2005.

문서에서 약제심사제도 선진화 방안 연구 (페이지 25-33)

관련 문서