수 있기 때문이다. 효창공원과 같이 장소의 대서사와 복잡한 이해관계를 해 결하기 어려운 곳에서는 공간을 규정하는 기준이자 중립적 매체로서 “경계”
에 집중하여 디자인을 풀어나가는 것이 공간의 공적 활용을 증진시키는 전 략이 될 수 있다.
하지만 본 연구는 공원과 직접적으로 관계를 가진 경계를 주로 다루었기 때문에 주변 도시 조직의 성격과 기능, 형태 등을 세밀하게 고려하지 못했 다는 점에서는 한계를 가진다.
참고문헌
강혜경 (2019) 「효창공원의 역사적 중층성과 상징성을 이용한 스토리텔링」, 『The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology』 5(1), pp.227-234.
국립국어연구원 표준국어대사전, https://stdict.korean.go.kr
지찬용·윤갑근 (2009) 「공간속 경계로서 틈의 유형에 관한 연구」, 『한국실내디자인학회 학술 대회 논문집』11(2), pp.181-185.
최미옥 (1999) 「공간의 경계에 관한 연구–공유공간을 중심으로」, 건국대학교 건축대학원 석 사학위논문.
최순섭·김형준·전영훈·김광현 (2006) 「현대건축의 타자적 경계공간에 관한 연구」, 『대한건축 학회 논문집』22(4), pp.179-186.
최승효 (2003) 「도시공간의 연속성을 위한 경계의 제안-당인선 폐선부지의 단절적 경계 극 복을 중심으로」, 건국대학교 건축전문대학원 석사학위논문.
케빈린치 저·한영호·정진우 공역 (2003) 『도시환경디자인』, 광문각.
토지이용규제정보서비스, http://luris.molit.go.kr
호사카 요우이치로우 저·이진민 역 (1999) 『경계의 형태 그 건축적 구조』, 한국산업훈련연구소.
Oxford English Dictionary, http://www.oed.com
PMA (2019) 「효창독립 100년 공원 효창공원 재구성 계획 발표자료」.
Abstract
The Park of the boundary
: Redesigning the Hyochang Park
Seoyoung Lee
Advised by Professor Wookju Jeong
Department of Landscape Architecture The Graduate School
Seoul National University
In recent, the Korean Government and Seoul city are planning to redesign Hyochang Park, celebrating the 100th anniversary March 1st Movement and Foundation of Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea. Hyochang Park is a big openspace located in Yongsan, the geographic center of Seoul, and also the historical place the memorial for patriotic martyrs and the first international soccer stadium in Korea are situated. However, the stakeholders who has occupied some part of the park are still maintaining the exclusive manner to public and creating a conflict on the orientation of the park redesign. The park, accordingly, has not functioned as the one of the most public
urban place.
This research begin with the question that is “why don’t we accept the existence of stakeholders and find a spatial solution to change the relationship between them”. If the closed and exclusive boundaries change to open and connecting boundaries, it can rebuild the relationship between stakeholders and enhance the publicity of the park. Thus, the research proposes the design composition of spatial boundaries and figured out three keyword elements making boundaries in space; path, boundary objects and liminal space. These are elements of the design as well as analytical framework in the research.
Path is not only a linear space which divide one place into two but also a corridor for communication which connects distant places. Path makes pedestrian circulation, connectivity, openness, and accessibility of the park. Boundary objects have physical entities and mark the division between spaces. The type, form, verticality, material and density of the objects make difference in spatial impression. Liminal space is extended area from the boundary. It is a potential place where any different characteristics can conflict or harmonize.
Meanwhile, Hyochang park has various characteristics due to the disparate facilities such as cemetery, shrine, stadium, park facilities and senior welfare center but they do not interact or harmonize with each other. The publicity of the park has been declined accordingly. Furthermore, the plan to make the park a sanctuary has failed because of the dispute between stakeholders.
Subsequently, this paper analyzes boundaries in Hyochang park with the mapping visualization and tried to find out the causes which reduce the publicity of the park. The characteristics of the boundaries can be categorized into three; path network connectivity, degree of discontinuity of boundary objects and potential liminal spaces.
There is no systematic pedestrian flow. It makes unnecessary fences, walls and boundary stones and limits the access from the city to the park. On the basis of the mapping visualization about boundary objects, it is found that Hyochang stadium, Kimkoomuseum, Uiyeolsa shrine are the most disconnected obstacles. Steep slope, vertical barrier, dense underplanting also limit free use of the park. Three spaces, Hychang stadium building, Hyochan plaza, and front yard of Kimkoomuseum, are drawn as potential liminal spaces where dynamic and various activities take place.
Lastly, the research proposes design principle and strategies to reconstruct open public space and to make use of potential liminal spaces. The design which aims the embracing and communicating boundaries will make the park dynamic and
enjoyable place which interacts with the urban fabric. material, height, density and other features. Liminal spaces should be spatially and programmatically associated with surrounding area and should be the place every citizen can participate in the public park program.
Changing the boundary not only changes the physical context but also give variety to the way people feel and experience the space. Transparent boundaries make it possible for people to observe each other, to communicate and to interact with each other. Liminal space becomes the potential place where any spontaneous public activities take place. Hyochang park with openness can be the urban infrastructure which is more interacting with the surrounding urban fabric and urban context.
The design focusing on the boundary determines the way the Path, Boundary Object, Liminal Space
Student Number: 2018-23183