• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Wireless Channel Model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "Wireless Channel Model"

Copied!
40
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Wireless Channel Model

Wha Sook Jeon

Mobile Computing and Communication Lab.

(2)

Radio Channel (1)

 Signal Fading

− large-scale component: Path Loss

− medium-scale slow varying component:

Shadowing

− small-scale fast varying component:

Multipath fading

(3)

Radio Channel (2)

(4)

LOS Path vs. NLOS Path

(5)

Path Loss & Shadowing

 Path Loss

− caused by dissipation of the power radiated by the transmitter

− depends on the distance between transmitter and receiver

 Shadowing

− caused by obstacles between the transmitter and receiver

that absorb power.

(6)

Multipath fading

 short-term fluctuation of the received signal caused by multipath propagation

 when mobile is moving

 Fading becomes fast as a mobile moves faster

 delay-power profile (delay spread)

Average power (dB)

Delay Narrowband

fading

Wideband fading

Rayleigh distribution

(7)

Channel Model

(8)

Simplified Pass Loss Model

 Path loss as a function of distance:

sometimes simple model can captures the essence of signal propagation without resorting to complicated path loss models.

Free-space, two-ray, Hata, COST extension to Hata are all of the same form

K : constant which depends on antenna characteristics and the average channel attenuation

Free space path gain at distance d0 assuming omni-directional antennas

Empirical measurements at d0

d0: reference distance

generally valid only at d> d0

d0 : 1-10m (indoor), 10-100m (outdoor)

: path loss exponent

at higher frequencies tend to be higher and at higher antenna heights tend to be lower

γ





= d

K d P

Pr t 0

γ

(9)

Empirical Path Loss Models

 Piecewise Linear Model  Indoor Attenuation Factors

− partition loss

− floor loss

− the building penetration loss

− It is difficult to find generic

models

(10)

Shadowing (1)

 Statistical models

The transmitted signal experiences random variation due to blockage from objects in the signal path and changes in reflecting surfaces and scattering objects.

 Log-normal shadowing

Ratio of transmit-to-receive power is a random variable with a log-normal distribution

Distribution of (the dB value of ) is Gaussian with mean and standard deviation

t

r P

P / ψ =

= 2

2 10

2

) log

10 exp (

2

10 ln / ) 10

(

dB dB

dB

p

ψ ψ

ψ σ

µ ψ ψ

σ ψ π

ψdB

ψ

ψdB

µ

ψdB

σ

= 2

2

2

) exp (

2 ) 1

(

dB dB

dB

dB

p dB

ψ ψ

ψ σ

µ ψ

σ ψ π

(11)

Shadowing (2)

constant.

n attenuatio an

is where

, )

(d e αd α

s =

= i

t d

d

i dt

d

t e e

d

s( ) = α∑ = α

 Justification for the Gaussian model as the distribution of

when shadowing is dominated by the attenuation from blocking object

attenuation of a signal as traveling through an obstacle with depth d

attenuation of a signal as it propagates through the region

dt : Gussian r.v. (by the Central Limit Theorem)

: Gussian r.v.

 Decorrelation distance :

the distance at which autocovariance equals 1/e of its maximum value

on the order of the size of the blocking objects or clusters of objects )

( log10s dt

ψdB

(12)

Combined Path Loss and Shadowing

 Combined model

− average dB path loss: the path loss model

− shadow fading with mean of 0 dB: variations about the path loss

 Simplified path loss with log-normal shadowing

− : ψ

dB

a Guassian r.v. with mean zero and variance

dB t

r

d K d

P dB

P = γ +ψ

0 10

10 10 log

log 10 ) (

ψdB

σ

Pr/Pt (dB)

log d Very slow Slow

10logK

γ

10

(13)

Outage Probability

 under the path loss and shadowing

− : the minimum received power level

− outage probability:

the probability that the received power at a given distance d falls below

for the combined path loss and shadowing (at slide 23)

P

min

Pmin

) , (Pmin d pout

) )

( ( )

,

(Pmin d p P d Pmin pout = r <

+

=

<

dB

d d K

P Q P

P d

P

p r t

σψ

γ log ( / ) 10

log 10 1 (

) )

(

( min min 10 10 0

(14)

Multipath

 Multipath fading

Constructive and destructive addition of different multipath components introduced by a channel

 Time-varying channel impulse response

If a single pulse is transmitted over a multipath channel, the received signal appears as a pulse train

A multipath channel is modeled by a channel impulse response.

 Characteristic of the multipath channel

time delay spread

Time delay between the arrivals of the first received signal component and the last received component associated with a single transmitted pulse

time-varying nature due to moving

 Narrowband fading model

 Wideband fading model

(15)

Example of Multipath

(16)

Multipath Component (1)

Nonresolvable components:

these are combined into a single component.

Resolvable components:

if the delay difference between two components significantly exceeds the inverse signal bandwidth

(17)

Multipath Component (2)

(18)

Doppler Shift

 When the transmitter is

moving, the received signal has a Doppler shift

 Doppler effect is on the order of 100 Hz for typical vehicle speed (75km/hr) and

frequencies (about 1GHz )

D D

D

f

v f t

π φ

λ θ φ

π

2

2 cos 1

=

∆ =

= ∆

(19)

Time-varying Channel Impulse Response

 Equivalent lowpass time-varying channel impulse response at time t to an impulse at time :

N(t): the number of multipath components

For the nth component

: delay

: phase shift -

: Doppler phase shift

: amplitude

 Time-invariant channel:

) (

) (

0

n j

N

n n

e n

c τ = α φ δ τ −τ

=

τ

t ( , ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( ))

0 t e t

t

c N t n j t n

n

n

δ τ τ

α

τ

=

= φ

)

n(t τ

Dn

φ n

D n

c

n t πf τ t φ

φ ( )=2 ( )

)

n(t α

)

n(t φ

(20)

Transmit & Receive Signal Models (1)

 Complex baseband representation

− The transmitted or received signals are actually real sinusoids

− The complex representations are used to facilitate analysis

 Transmitted signal

complex baseband signal with in-phase component s

I

(t) and quadrature component s

Q

(t)

{

( )

}

( )cos(2 ) ( )sin(2 )

Re )

(t u t e 2 s t f t s t f t

s = j πfct = I π c Q π c

) ( )

( )

(t s t js t

u = I + Q

(21)

Transmit & Receive Signal Models (2)

 Transmitted signal

 Received signal





=





=





=

=

∑ ∫

∫ ∑

=

=

=

t f j N(t)

n

n t

j n

t f j N(t)

n

n t

j n

t f j -

N(t)

n

n t

j n

t f j

c n

c n

c n

c

e t t

u e

t

e d

t u t e

t

e d t

u t e

t

e d t

u t c t

r

π φ

π φ

π φ

π

τ α

τ τ τ

τ δ α

τ τ τ

τ δ α

τ τ τ

2 0

) (

2 0

) (

2 0

) (

2

)) ( (

) ( Re

) ( )) ( (

) ( Re

) ( )) ( (

) ( Re

) (

) , ( Re

) (

{

u t ej fct

}

t

s( ) = Re ( ) 2π





=

N t t ej n t u t t ej fct

t

r( ) Re ( )α ( ) φ ( ) ( τ ( )) 2π

(22)

Narrowband Fading Model

(23)

Narrowband Fading Model (1)

 Narrowband fading assumption

− Delay spread:

− The LOS and all multipath components are typically nonresolvable.

 Received Signal

 In order to characterize the random scale factor caused by the multipath, u(t)=1

− Transmitted signal:

− Received signal:

Tm << 1B

i

i u t

t

u( −

τ

) ≈ ( ) for all

τ





 

 

= 

=( ) ( ) 0

2 ( )

) ( Re )

( j t

t N

n n t

f

j c n

e t e

t u t

r π α φ

channel

characteristic

{ }

e f t

t

s( ) = Re j2πfct = cos2

π

c

t

N( )

  

(24)

Narrowband Fading Model (2)

 Received Signal

− in-phase component:

− quadrature component:

 r

I

(t) and r

Q

(t) can be approximated as Gaussian random processes

− if N(t) is large, and and are independent for different components.

− when for small N(t) each ray has a Rayleigh distributed envelope and uniform phase

− r

I

(t) and r

Q

(t) are independent Gaussian process with the same autocorrelation , a mean of zero, and a crosscorrelation of zero

) ( cos ) ( )

(

) (

0

t t

t

r n

t N

n n

I

α φ

=

=

t f t

r t f t

r t

r( ) = I( )cos2π c + Q( )sin2π c

) ( sin ) ( )

(

) (

0

t t

t

r n

t N

n n

Q

α φ

=

=

)

n(t

α φn(t)

(25)

Autocorrelation and Cross Correlation (1)

 Assumption

− There is no dominant LOS component

− The amplitude, multipath delay and Doppler frequency shift are changing slowly enough to be considered constant over the time interval of interest

− is uniform distributed on [-

π , π ]

this is reasonable because is large and hence can go through a 360o rotation for a small change

 The received signal r(t) is zero-mean Gaussian process

n

n D

n D n

n

n(t) α ,τ (t) τ , f (t) f α

)

n(t φ

t f f

t c n Dn

n π τ π

φ ( ) = 2 2

0 )]

( cos E[

] [ E )]

( [

E r t =

n n t =

n

I α φ

fc

τn

) 0 )]

( ) ( [ E

( rI t rQ t = 0

)]

( E[sin ]

[ E )]

( [

E r t =

α φ t =
(26)

Autocorrelation and Cross Correlation (2)

 Autocorrelation

− A uniform scattering environment assumption

The channel consists of many scatters densely packed with respect to angle

− Each component has the same received

power:

N n

n n θ π

θ = =2

N Pr

n] 2

[

E α2 =

) sin(2

) ( )

2 cos(

) ( )]

( ) ( [ E )

( t r t r t t A t f t A , t f t

Ar r c r r c

Q I

I ∆ ∆ − ∆ ∆

=

∆ +

=

∆ π π

=

+

=

n n

n I

I r

t t v

t r t r t

AI θ

λ

α 2π cos cos

] [ E 5 . 0 )]

( ) ( [ E )

( 2

=

+

=

n n

n Q

I r

r

t t v

t r t r t

AI Q θ

λ

α 2π cos sin

] [ E 5 . 0 )]

( ) ( [ E )

( 2

,

θ λ θ

π

π

 

 ∆ ∆

=

=

t n v t P

A

N

n r

rI 2 cos

2 cos )

(

1

v

(27)

Autocorrelation and Cross Correlation (3)

) 2

cos(

) ( )

( t A t f t

A ∆ = ∆ π ∆

) 2

(

2 cos 2 cos

) (

0 2 0

t f J

P

t d v t P

A

D r

r rI

=



 

 ∆

=

π

θ λ θ

π π

π

0

2 cos 2 sin

)

( 2

, 0

=



 

 ∆

=

t Pπ

π πλv t θ dθ

Ar r r

Q I

0

, ∆ →

θ

N

λ 4 . 0

4 .

0 =

=

t v t

fD

Antenna spacing of 0.4λ:

the signal decorrelates over a distance of 0.4λ

π θ

θ π θ

d e j e

x

Jn n 2 jxcos jn 2 0

) 1

( =

(28)

Power Spectral Density

)]

2 ( [

) (

)]

( )

( [

25 . ) (

0

π

D

τ

r

c r

c r

r

f PJ

f S

f f

S f

f S f

S

I

I I

= F

+ +

=

f

c

+f

D

f

c

S

r

(f)

f

c

-f

D
(29)

Envelope and Power Distributions without LOS

 Signal envelope

− r

I

and r

Q

are Gaussian random variables with mean zero and variance

− z(t) is Rayleigh distributed

 Power

− The received signal power is exponentially distributed with mean

σ2

) ( )

( )

( )

( t r t r

2

t r

2

t

z = =

I

+

Q

0

, )

( 2

2

2

2

= z e z

z p

z Z

σ σ

1

x

2 2

) ( )

( t r t

z =

2σ 2

(30)

Signal Envelope over Channel having a LOS

 Signal envelope

− The received signal equals the superposition of a LOS component and a complex Gaussian component

The signal envelope

z(t) has a Rician distribution.

 Average received power

− Fading parameter :

K = 0: Rayleigh fading

K = ∞: no fading (only a LOS component)

the smaller K, the severer fading 0

, )

( 2 0 2

) ( 2

2 2 2

 ≥

 

= 

+

zs z I

z e z

p

s z

Z σ σ σ

2 2

0

2

( ) = + 2 σ

= ∫

x p x dx s

P

r Z

LOS component power

NLOS component power

* I0: the modified Bessel function

2 2

K = s

(31)

Nakagami Fading Channel

 Nakagami fading distribution

− More general fading distribution whose parameters (m) can be adjusted to fit a variety of empirical measurements

m = 1: Rayleigh fading

m = ∞: no fading

: approximately Rician fading 5

. 0

, )

( ) 2

(

2

1

2

= Γ e m

P m

z z m

p Pr

mz m

r m m Z

) 1 2

( ) 1

( + 2 +

= K K

m

(32)

Wideband Fading

(33)

Intersymbol Interference

 Narrowband fading:

delay spread

-

There is little interference with a subsequently

transmitted pulse

.

 Wideband fading:

- The resolvable multipath components interfere with subsequently transmitted pulses:

τ

1 τ2 Bu

2 1

1

τ

>>

τ

T Tm >>

T Tm <<

 Two multipath components with delay and are resolvable

if

(34)

Autocorrelation: Time Domain

 Equivalent lowpass time-varying channel impulse response at time t to an impulse at time

: a complex zero-mean Gaussian random process

 The statistical characterization of is determined by its autocorrelation function

 For the WSS channel, the autocorrelation is independent of t.

 For the WSS channel with uncorrelated scattering

The channel response associated with a multipath component of delay is uncorrelated with the response associated with a component of a

different delay because they are caused by different scatters.

)) ( (

) ( )

,

( ( )

) (

0

t e

t t

c j t n

t N

n n

n δ τ τ

α

τ = φ

=

τ

t

) , ( t c

τ

)]

, ( ) , ( E[

) , , ,

( 1 2 t t c* 1 t c 2 t t

Ac τ τ ∆ = τ τ +∆

)]

, ( ) , ( E[

) , ,

( 1 2 t c* 1 t c 2 t t

Ac τ τ ∆ = τ τ +∆

τ

1 1

2

τ

τ

) , ( )

( ) , ( )]

, ( ) , (

E[c* τ1 t c τ2 t +∆t = Ac τ1t δ τ1 −τ2 = Ac τ ∆t

) (

τ

=

τ

2 =

τ

1
(35)

Autocorrelation: Frequency Domain

 Characteristics of the time-varying multipath channel at time t

in time domain:

in frequency domain:

A complex zero-mean Gaussian process

is completely characterized by its autocorrelation.

Autocorrelation of

the WSS channel:

) , ( t c

τ

τ τ t e πτd c

t f

C

j f

= ( , ) 2

) , (

) , (f t C

) , (f t C

)]

, ( ) , ( E[

) , , ,

( f1 f2 t t C* f1 t C f2 t t

AC ∆ = +∆

)]

, ( ) , ( E[

) , ,

(f1 f2 t C* f1 t C f2 t t

AC = +

[ ]

) , (

) ,

( ) , ( E

) ,

( )

, ( E

) , , (

) ( 2

2 1 2

2 2

1

*

2 2

- 2 1 2

- 1

* 2

1

1 2

2 2 1

1

2 2 1

1

d e

t A

d d e

e t t c t c

d e

t t c d

e t c

t f f A

f f j c

f j f j

f j f

j C

=

+

=



 +

=

∫ ∫

τ τ

τ τ τ

τ

τ τ

τ τ

τ π

τ π τ

π

τ π τ

π

(36)

Power Delay Profile

 Power delay profile

− Average power associated with a given multipath delay

 Delay spread

− Average delay spread:

− rms delay spread:

− the delay associated with a given multipath component is weighted by its relative power

 The delay spread of the channel is roughly by the time delay T where

− : the system experiences significant ISI

− : ISI can be negligible

) 0 when

) , ( ( )]

, ( ) , ( E[

)

( = c* t c t A t t =

Ac τ τ τ c τ

τ

=

0 0

) (

) (

τ τ

τ τ µ τ

d A

d A

c c Tm

=

0 0

2

) (

) ( )

(

τ τ

τ τ µ

σ τ

d A

d A

c

c T

T

m m

Relative power

T Ac(τ) ≈ 0 for τ ≥

) 10 (

m

m s T

T

s T

T <<σ <σ

) 10 (

m

m s T

T

s T

T >>σ > σ

(37)

Coherence Bandwidth (1)

describes the autocorrelation of the time-varying multipath channel in frequency domain (coherence)

Coherence bandwidth of the channel

By the Fourier transform relationship between

Flat fading and frequency selective fading

signal bandwidth: B

Flat fading:

Frequency selective fading:

c C

c A f f B

B such that ( ) 0 for all )]

, (

) , ( E[

)

( f C* f t C f f t

AC = +

) ( and )

( c τ

C f A

A T f

f A T

Ac( ) 0 for , then C( ) 0 for 1

if τ τ > >

Tm

c k

B 1T = σ

Bc

B <<

ISI negligible

1

1 >>

c Tm

s B B

T σ

<<

σ c

B B >>

(38)

Coherence Bandwidth (2)

(39)

Coherence Time and Doppler Power Spectrum (1)

 Time variation of the channel which arise from transmitter or receiver motion cause a Doppler shift

describe the autocorrelation of the channel at a frequency over the time (channel coherence over the time)

 Coherence time

 Doppler power spectrum

ρ : Doppler shift

Sc(ρ): the PSD of the received signal as a function of ρ

Doppler Spread: B

)]

, ( ) , ( E[

)

( t C* f t C f t t

AC = +

c C

c A t t T

T such that ( ) 0 for

t d e

t A

SC =

C j t

πρ

ρ) ( ) 2

(

(40)

Coherence Time and Doppler Power Spectrum (2)

Relationship between the coherence time and the Doppler spread

By the Fourier transform relationship between

If the transmitter and reflector are stationary and the receiver is moving with velocity v

Remind that in the narrowband fading model the signal decorrelates over the time of 0.4/fD

In general,

In summary,

c C

c

C t t T S T

A ( ) 0 for , then ( ) 0 for 1

if > ρ ρ>

) ( and )

( C ρ

C t S

A

c

D T

B 1

D

D v f

B λ = Maximum Doppler shift

).

( of shape on the

depends where

, C ρ

c

D k T k S

B

D c

T

c T B

B

m

1

1 , ≈

≈ σ

참조

관련 문서

Depth-stacked time series received from channel probing source signal without

In this paper a super-resolution time delay estimation algorithm that estimates the time delays of spread spectrum signals using sparse signal reconstruction

Previous researches do not consider practical issues affecting on the accuracy of time synchronization such as high-channel access delay and relative

In this paper, we analyze and simulate the channel capacity of a spread spectrum watermarking (SSW) technique in wireless fading channel to apply ITS

Depth-stacked time series received from channel probing source signal without

This allows you to check the performance of the algorithm SAGE and is highly stable to delay spread (Delay Spread), the diffusion angle of arrival (Arrive of

Therefore, the performance of the WAVE system is degraded by continual channel variation in the WAVE multipath fading channels after starting initial

In this paper, we improve performance for system when the carrier recovery signal is not perfect in the multipath mobile wireless communication fast