• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Mechanical Systems III

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "Mechanical Systems III"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Mechanical Systems III

(2)

Drawing a F.B.D. using d’Alembert’s principle

• d’Alembert’s Principle :

The sum of the differences between the forces acting on a system and the time derivatives of the moments of the system itself along a virtual displacement con sistent with the constraints of the system, is zero.

• One can transform an accelerating rigid body into an equivalent static system

by adding the so-called “inertial force” and “inertial moment”

(3)

Mechanical Impedances

( ) ( )

M

( ) Z s F s

 X s

( ) ( )

F s  KX s

( ) ( )

F s  CsX s

( )

2

( )

F s  Ms X s

K

( )

Z s  K

C

( )

Z s  Cs ( )

2

Z

M

s  Ms

Find TF without writing the differential equation!

Let’s define Mechanical Impedance as

[Sum of impedances] X(s) = [Sum of applied forces]

Problem Solving Technique:

(4)

Example: Two mass system

1 1 1 1 2 ( 2 1 ) 1 1 2 ( 2 1 )

m x    k x  k x  x  c x   c x   x 

1 2 2 ( 2 1 ) 2 ( 2 1 )

m x    f k x  x  c x   x 

Using Mechanical Impedances Using differential equation

m

1

m

2

2

1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2

( m s  ( c  c s )  ( k  k )) X s ( )  ( c s k X s  ) ( )

2

1 2 2 2 2 2 1

( m s  c s k X s  ) ( )  F s ( ) (  c s k X s  ) ( )

(5)

2 2

0 0

1 1

2 2

L L

KE   y dm 

r

  y   dy dm r   dy

2 2 2 3

2

2 2

0 0

0

1 1 1

2 2 2 3

L

L

y x

L

x y

KE x dy y dy

L L L

 

  

    

 

    

Mass of an infinitesimal element of thickness dy

 : mass density per unit length of the material

1

2

2 y dm 

r

y x y

 L

 

2 2

1 1

2 3 2 3

m

r

KE      L    x         x 

3

r e

m  m 

  

  Kinetic Energy of the rod

Rewrite the KE in the form of the total mass of the rod Kinetic Energy of infinitesimal element

Rewrite the KE using

Energy Method for Deriving Equivalent Mass of Elastic Elements

(6)

Equivalent masses of common elements

3 3

k 4Ewh

 L

3

4

3

k Ewh

 L

3 3

16Ewh k  L

4 T

32

k GD L

 

e

0.38

d

m  m

e

0.23

d

m  m

e

0.5

d

m  m

e

m

d

m

d

m

d

e d

/ 3

I   I I

I

d
(7)

Example: Wheel-axle system with bearing damping

2 T I     T RF  c 

mx    f c x c   x c   x   kx

Example: Pneumatic Door Closer

w 2 s

I  I  I

(8)

Example: System with displacement input

N ote that ultimately motion is generated by a force and that this force must be great e nough

.

( )

mx   k y   x cx 

( )

T T

I    k     c  

참조

관련 문서

The optimum tire force distribution method finds the longitudinal/lateral tire forces of each wheel that minimize the cost function, which is the sum of the normalized tire

This paper will be carried out analyzing and comparing the tensile forces and deflection of a cable spoke wheel system for the large span retractable roof,

Cable network system is a flexible lightweight structure which curved cables can transmit only tensile forces. The weight of cable roof dramatically can reduce

6 e8 present the results of comparison between the model tests and CFD calculations for the surge forces, heave forces, and pitch moment acting on the UUV body at drift angles of 15

The self-matching network (Wang et al., 2017) is used to calculate an attention weight for itself and a context vector by using a weighted sum, after which the weights

Results of principle component analysis for the discrimination of pork loin with storage time using second system

If the internal tensile forces of the strengthened member from steel and FRP is insufficient, the FRP system strain might become greater than its ultimate

In motion of the sliding region, friction forces depend on the velocity of the system and are known as Coulomb, stick-slip, stribeck effect and viscous friction..