지역발전계획제도 운영실태와 개선방안

(1)

(2)

(3)

경 제 인 문 사 회 연 구 회 협 동 연 구 총 서 10-07-01 국 토 연 2010-15

(4)

(5)

지역경쟁력 강화를 위한

지역발전계획제도 운영실태와 개선방안

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

, ) , )

, )

, ) .

,

. .

)

, ) , )

.

, ,

,

(17)

. , ,

. .

,

, ,

. ,

( 3 2

), ,

.

)

, ) ,

) · .

,

(18)

,

.

· ,

, .

, ,

. ,

.

, -

, ·

.

, ·

.

(19)

.

, · .

·

.

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23)

(24)

(25)

(26)

(27)

(28)

(29)

(30)

(31)

.

, ,

(32)

.

(33)

.

, .

.

,

.

, ,

.

(research questions) . “

?

? , ?”

. “

?

?” .

.

(34)

.

·

. , .

, , .

(35)

, , (planning process) . .

, ,

.

, ,

.

. 16

.

, .

47 96

1) ,

(36)

, . ,

. , , 11

, .

.

, .

· ,

. ,

. .

,

.

(37)

7 . 1 ,

(research questions) . 2

.

. 3

,

. 4 ,

, , . 5 4

. 6

, .

· . 7

, , .

(38)

(39)

(planning)

(Hall, 1992).

,

. (development planning)

(Kuklinski, 1975).

(regional development planning)

(40)

. · ,

.

(planning system), (planning process)

(implementation) .

, , .²⁾

, , .

(41)

.

,

(42)

. , ,

, .

(planning process)

. , ,

.

(normative theories) (prescriptive theories) .³⁾

(theories of planning) .

3) Faludi(1973) (substantive theories, theory in planning:

, ) (procedural

theories, theory of planning:

) ( , 2006: 16).

(43)

(theories in planning) , (procedural planning theory)⁴⁾

. ,

.

. (rationality)

,

. ,

, .

4) (prescriptive theories)

.

(44)

1950 1960 (rationality) , 1970 1980

. 1980 1990

.

(decision making process) (concensus building

process) .

) ,⁵⁾ )

,⁶⁾ ) ,⁷⁾ )

8) .

,

. , ,

. , 1990

(communicative planning),

(collaborative planning) .⁹⁾

(45)

,

, , .

,

, , ,

. .

.

, ·

.

, ,

.

, ,

. , ,

,

· , ,

.

(46)

(47)

(48)

2000

. ,

. , 2003

, ,

. , -

, .

. ,

.

. ,

,

.

, ,

. ·

,

(49)

, , .

.

, ,

.

,

.

“ ?

? ,

?” . “

(50)

?

?” .

)

· , ) , )

, ) , )

.

(51)

,

, .

10) “

, ?

?” . 16

.¹¹⁾

10) 2010 7 9 , 81% “

· ” . 4 [ 3]

.

11) 2010 4 5 , 16 .

(52)

.

. 47 96

. ,

.¹²⁾

13)

31 . ,

12) [ 1]

13) , , ,

, .

(53)

· · . ,

.

· .

, 21

67.7% (32.3%) 2

. , 15 (48.4%)

, , 16 (51.6%) . ,

8 (25.8%),

20 (64.5%), 3 (9.7%)

. , 10 64.5%, 5 32.3%

, 24 (77.4%), 7 (22.6%) .

.

, (41.9%), (16.1%),

(13.0%) .

16 13.5

, 19 . 16 ·

· .

, 7.5

(55.6%) , 6.0 (44.4%) . ,

5.8 (43.0%) , ,

7.7 (57.0%) . ,

,

(54)

88.9% . , 5

52.6%, 6 9 6.7%, 10 40.7% ,

11.6 (85.9%), 1.9 (14.1%)

. ,

(29.6%), (23.0%), (17.0%) .

16

. , 31

13.5 2.3 .

, .

(policy plan) .

, .

(55)

,

.

, .

78% , 86% .

.

, 25.8%

.

, 10 ,

5 .

, ,

.

, , ,

. ,

.

(56)

지역유형 기초생활권

( )

기타 5 (16.1)

1.5 (11.1) 　

1.7 　

2

(11.1)　 도시형　

(0.0) 3 (15.8)

도농 연계형　

　 2 (13.3)

1 (6.7)

2 (20.0)

2 (16.7)

1.3 　

2 (13.3)

도농 연계형　 2

(16.7)

농산 어촌형　 2

(15.4) 3 (25.0)

2 (15.4)

-

(57)

47 96

( 1) .

, , , , ,

, , .

· , ,

, ,

5 .

(96 ) ) , )

(58)

, ) , ) , )

, ) , , )

. ,

, , ,

, .

(policy

plan) .

(96 ) 46 (47.9%), 63 (65.6%) ,

13 (13.5%) .

.

(59)

( ) ( ) .

8 . ( )

· .

) ( ) ( )

( ), ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( ), )

( ) ( ) ( ),

) ( , ) ( , ) .

, ( )

( , ) 48 (50.0%) , ( ) 33 (34.4%),

( ) 15 (15.6%) .

,

.

,

, ·

.

42 (43.8%)¹⁴⁾, 40 (41.7%)¹⁵⁾,

(60)

16) 14 (14.5%) .

80 (83.3%)¹⁷⁾, 13 (13.6%), 3 (3.1%) .

(83.3%) ,

.

, ( )

( , ) .

51 (52.0%), 47 (48.0

%)¹⁸⁾ , 31 , 16 .

14) .

15) , , , , .

16) , .

17) 2 . 32 ( )

.

(61)

82 (83.7%) ,

16 (16.3%) .

, ,

.

: (96 )

( )

. 90 (93.8%), 6 (6.2%) .

, 40 (41.7%)

.

) (29 ), )

(2 ), )

18) 9 2 .

(62)

(9 ) .

19)

.

20) ,

.

, ( )

.

. ,

.

(63)

(64)

47 20 . ,

.

4 3 ( ) “ 5

” .

.

(65)

, , , · , .

.

. ,

· .

( ),

( ), (

) , ( ,

), ( ) .

· ( ),

( ) , · · · ,

,

, , .

(96 ) 39 (40.6%)

. )

(16 ), )

(10 ), ) (10 ),

) (3 ) .

,

.

.²¹⁾

(66)

(96 ) 16 , 4 .

,

.

(67)

(2003 ) , 5 1

5 (2004 2008) ,

· .

·

, ‘ 1 5

(2009 2013)’ . 5

( ) ( )

( ) .

( ),

( ) .

(68)

2008 3 .

, .

( )

.

2004 ,

· .

, .

,

. ,

, ,

.

. 2010

( )

(69)

. 2005 5 3267 , 2009

9 4311 , 2010 9 8615 ( 4.7%) .

( ) ,

. ,

.

,²²⁾

(70)

81% . .

,

83% .

.

(31.8%), · · (31.8%),

(19.2%),

(17.4%) . “

” ,

· .²³⁾

,

· .

16 ,

.

. - -

(81.5%) .

, .

· . < 3-11> , ,

(71)

. , ,

, (policy), (strategy), (program or project)

.

( 1) , (96 ) 4%

.

. ,

.

( ) ( )

3 4 .

,

.

(72)

. ,

.

,

.

(73)

, .

,

.

· , ,

.

( 1) , , ,

41.7% .

40.6% ,

16 17% , 3

3% . 16

17% .

( 1) ,

.

,

. ,

.

(74)

. ,

(75)

, .

, ,

.

, .

.

. 16 ·

,

.

(76)

(77)

,

.

, ,

11 .

, , ,

.

(78)

(in-depth interview) ,

(survey) .

(79)

24) (2004), 1 5 :

(80)

2003

, 1 5 .

, (

) ( ) .

.²⁵⁾

5 , -

, ,

, , , , NGO

.

, ,

, .

(81)

2003.6:

2003.8: 5

2003.12:

2003.10 2004.5: (16 , 20

, NGO 1 )

2004.5: ,

. ,

.

,

, .

, ,

.

(82)

2004 2008 127 ,

51 . 1

(2004 2008) 51 4337 ,

(2005 2008) 25 9333

50.4% .

,

( ) ( )

.

,

, ,

(83)

. , , .

. .

( )

, ,

.

1 5 (2009 2013)

.

( ), ( )

.

1 5 (2009 2013) , 4

, , ,

, 5 , , , ,

.

, · , .

26) (2009), 1 5 :

(84)

5 < 4-2> . ,

. , ·

.

, .

(85)

5

, .

,

. ·

. 161 560 , 91 8042

(57.0%), 28 3695 (17.6%), 40 8823 (25.4%)

. < 4-3> .

,

.

27) ,

, DB .

(86)

·

, , ·

.

, .

.

1 5 (2009 2013) 2013

,

(87)

2020 .

5 ,

.

( )

.

,

. 5

,

, (2010 ) (2009 )

.

( 5 )

.

1990

(counter magnet) ( ) 8

32) . , ,

31) - (1999), (2006)

(2010.7.22) .

(88)

. - ( )

.

, .

1994 1998 4 , 1999

1999 12

.

, .

. ,

.

.³³⁾

,

·

32) 4 (2000) 2 10 .

(89)

. ,

4 ,

, .

,

.

(2007)

.³⁵⁾

,

. , , ,

. ,

, .

. .

.

, .

34) (2010.7.9) .

(90)

.

, .

- - - -

. ,

. 12 ³⁶⁾

.

, . 42

.

5.3 , 52.8%, 32.1%, 15.1%

. ,

, ,

36) , , , , , , ,

, , , , 12 .

(91)

,

. 2010 54% .

2010 1 2206 6624 , 1

302 5507 (53%) .

·

. , .

5.18

2 .

37) .

(92)

, . ,

.

, .

7 , .

( )

. , ,

, . ,

. ,

.

(93)

6 .

. ,

39) .

, 5 .

1 (1982 1991)

81%

, 2 (1992 200)

.

38) (2007) .

39) 10 , 2000 20

(94)

,

. .

.

. ,

.

41)

40) (2010.5.11), ( )

.

41) 1960 , , ,

(1963), (1980 ,

(95)

,

.⁴²⁾

. 2

5 (955 ) , 60 1 1007 .

, , ,

4 .

2005 5

10% ( ) ,

.

1994 ) .

42) 5 ( ,

5 ) , .

(96)

. ,

. 3 28%

56% 2 . 36

24 .

. ,

. 7

.

43), ,

44)

. ,

.

· ,

. 8 ( ,

, , , , , , ) .

(2007 ) , ·

44)

45) .

(97)

, , , , , .

(20 , 2020 ), (5

, 2008 2012 ), ( ) . 5

, .

,

6 8 .

60 80 (5 )

.

, .

.

(98)

, ,

, .

,

.

2 .

2008 8 60 80 3

.

( ) ,

. ,

. , .⁴⁶⁾

· , .

, , .

46) ( ), ,

.

(99)

, ,

,

.

,

.

· ,

· .

(1997 2015) , , , 4

(436.9 ) , , ,

3 82 4 5611 .

28

. ,

.

47) (2010.7.12)

, 1997 2005 .

(100)

.

, ( ) 400 500

. (

), ( 22

), ( · ), (

) .

. ,

· .

,

. ,

.⁴⁸⁾

, ,

, .⁴⁹⁾

48) ( )

(2005 2016 ) .

(101)

,

.

. , , 5 ,

51) .

2009.7:

2009.8:

2008.9: ( )

2009.9: TF

2009.9 : ( , )

2010.2: : ,

49)

50) ( , 2010), ,

.

51) , 163

.

(102)

,

3 .

.⁵²⁾

, 5

,

. ,

( )

.

16 (2010 2014)

,

1.72 , 2 (2.6 ), (3.1 ),

(3.2 ), (3.5 ) .

(103)

. 7 .

( ) ( ) .

7

.

,

, , 7 ·7 ,

, , , ,

. .

53) (2010.7.21) .

(104)

,

.

,

.

, ,

478 2010 8 9

. 175 , 58 233

48.7% .⁵⁴⁾

54) [ 3]

(105)

“

?” 81% “ ” .

·

, .

“ (78.5%)”

.

(45.9%), (31.2%), (22.9%) .

, ,

.

“

” 83.0% .

(106)

(31.7%), (31.7%), (19.2%),

(17.4%) . “ , ,

” “ ”

81.5% .

“

” 70.8% “ ” .

,

29.2% .

, .

.

(107)

?

(3.73 ), (3.27 ), (3.24

), (3.21 ), (3.17 ),

(3.04 ) . ,

(2.73) .⁵⁵⁾

1/3 “ ”

, 2/3 .

64.7% “ ”

. ,

(108)

(34.2%), (19.0%),

(17.0%), (14.8%),

(10.0%), (7.8%) .

.

,

“ ”

.

(109)

(29.8%),

(18.2%), (12.3%),

(11.4%), (10.5%) .

(47.1%), (26.2%), (14.8%)

.

(19.3%),

(19.7%), (18.2%),

(12.8%), (10.2%) .

(110)

(22.0%), (20.9%), - (19.1%),

(14.2%) .

(31.3%),

(31.3%) .

“ ”

18.3% , .

“ ”

, (30.0%),

(19.0%), (9.2%)

. ,

“ ”

. ,

, ,

“ ” .

(29.8%),

(18.2%), (12.3%),

(11.4%) .

.

(111)

,

. ,

, .

,

.

· ,

.

, ,

.

, ,

. ,

. .

(112)

.

. 16

.

. ,

.

(113)

.

, ·

.⁵⁶⁾

,

.

,

.

, 3

.

(114)

,

, ,

, .

, · ,

, · .

(115)

,

. ,

, · .

, 70.8%

.

. ,

.

,

.

· ,

.

(116)

(117)

, , , 4 .

. ·

.

. ,

, .

,

, , , ,

, ,

(118)

, , .

2000

. 1950

.

2005 7

12 .

57) ( ) ( Brief)

. 1 .

(119)

· ⁵⁸⁾ . , .

, ,

( ) .

,

2 , ,

. , 2

, ,

58) , ,

, (action plan) .

, ( 1 ) , (

1 ) ‘ ’ .

(120)

. .

( ) ) , ,

,⁵⁹⁾ ) ,

5 , 2

) ,

. ( )

,

.

2005

.

59)

.

(121)

,

(5 ) ( )

, .⁶⁰⁾

. ,

,

.

·

,

60) , .

5 .

(122)

. ,

.

2009 8 4 8 ⁶¹⁾

. ( )

.

, ,

. ·

, 10

.

(123)

, ,

, , ,

, , .

, , ,

62) .

,

, ,

61) , 10 .

62)

.

(124)

, , · · · , , .

,

.

, .

, , , ⁶³⁾ .

.

,

63) ,

, (2007

).

(125)

.

· . ,

.

, 3

.

, .

,

.

, .

. ,

,

.⁶⁴⁾

,

.

, ,

64) (2006.12) ,

, ,

( , 2010: 44).

(126)

.

2007 10 ,

(2005 ) .

, ·

( )

.

.⁶⁵⁾ , NPO,

, , ⁶⁶⁾ .

.

65) .

66) , (

) .

(127)

, . ,

. ,

( ) .⁶⁷⁾ 2005 2008

1063 .

, .

,

, .

.

67) ( )

( )

(2007.8.6 ). ,

.

(128)

,

. (2005 ) , ·

68) ,

5 .

.

,

, ,

.

,

. , ⁶⁹⁾ .

( 280 ) 7

, 42 ⁷⁰⁾ .

68) , , .

69)

.

70) 1

(129)

,

. ‘ ’

. , (2007 )

, · ·

.

2005

,

.

, .

. ,

(130)

.

, ,

.

. ,

,

.

· ,

. ,

,

. ,

,

.

71) ( ) ( )

, 2 .

(131)

40 1990

, ,

. 2000

(zero-sum) ‘

(competitive cooperation)’ .

, 2008 10 ‘

( Balladur)’ .

2009 3 20

. 75% ,

,

. 22

15

, 11 ,

.

.⁷²⁾

72) “ 20 ...( )...

”.

(132)

, 1982 ‘

’

. . 1993 11 (1993

1997)

1993 .

2000 DATAR 20

. 1999 ‘ ’

(SSC) 2002

. DATAR

(20 ) 8 ⁷³⁾ . (SSC)

,

. , (Prefet),

, .

(super-region) ,

.

DATAR · ·

. 2020

6 .

73) , , , , , , ,

.

(133)

. 1982 , .

1995 ‘ ’

(SRADT) .

. 5 (SSC)

.

, , ,

.

2004 ‘ ’ 5

(SDRE) .

.

(134)

1992 ‘ ’

. 1999 ‘

’ , ⁷⁴⁾

.

( )

,

. ,

· .

DATAR( ), ( ), ( )

.

(CIADT), (DATAR),

(CNADT) .

,

CIADT⁷⁵⁾ ,

DATAR . DATAR

1963 .⁷⁶⁾ DATAR

74) , , ,

.

75) CIADT 2009 DATAR , CIACT(

), MINE( ) .

76) DATAR 2005 DIACT( ) , 2009

DATAR ,

.

(135)

, ,

. DATAR ,

· .

CNADT

. DATAR ,

.

(136)

,

, , .

, 1992

, 2 3 .

.

, ,

. .

, ,

. DATAR ,

,

. DATAR 7.6 ,

11.15 , , . 12

,

. )

, ) , )

.

, (Prefet)

,

. 2004 ,

, · .

(Cnotracts de Plan)

(137)

. 1982 ‘ ’

.

, , ,

.

, .

. CIADT DATAR

. , .

, 7 ⁷⁷⁾ .

77) 1984 5 . 1 2 5 , 3

6 , 4 5 7 .

(138)

.

(139)

5 (2007 2013) )

, ) , ,

) ,

. DATAR

( ) ( )

. ,

CIADT .

- 5

.⁷⁸⁾ - ,

. 1 (1984 1988)

64.5: 35.5 , 5 (2007 2013)

31.5: 68.5 .

.

2000 . 4

(2000 2006) ) , )

(140)

, )

.

, )

,⁷⁹⁾ ) , )

.

, , ,

.

, DATAR , ,

.

CIADT, DATAR

79) Proven Alpes Cote D'Azur 4 125 .

(141)

.

. 2009 DIACT DATAR

.

( ,

), ( , ), .

.

5 (2007 2013) ,

.

2001 Planning: Delivering a Fundamental

Change .

, , ,

, , , ,

(spatial planning) (Cullingworth and Nadin,

2006). . ,

80) ( URBAN PLASMA) ( )

, 3 .

(142)

. ,

. , . ,

. ,

(evidence-based plan) .⁸¹⁾

2004 (The Planning &

Compulsory Purchase Act) .⁸²⁾

(Regional Spatial Strategy: RSS) Local Development Frameworks

( LDF) 2 .

RSS LDF . )

, )

81)

, .

‘ ’ ,

. LDF

(AMR) .

82) ,

.

(143)

, , ,

, )

, ) .

2004 (PPG)

(PPS) . PPS

. ‘ ’

. Planning Policy Statement1: Delivering Sustainable

Development .⁸³⁾

.

. PPS

. PPG ,

PPS ,

PPS .

(regional planning guidance: RPG)

(regional spatial strategy: RSS) ,

(sub-regional strategy) .

(structure plan) .

.⁸⁴⁾

84) ,

.

(144)

전후 비교 Act 2004 ․

(145)

(RSS)

(Integrated Regional Strategy) .⁸⁵⁾ (IRS)

, · · ·

. (RDA) (RES) ,

, . .

85) RDA (RES) ,

.

(IRS) .

(146)

(RSS) .

, ,

, . , ,

, , .

(RSS) , ,

. (Sub-regional

Development Frameworks) )

, )

, , , )

. 2010

, , RDA

. .⁸⁶⁾

(local plan) (UDP) LDF

. LDF

(ODPM, 2004).⁸⁷⁾

LDF . LDF (DPD),

LDF (LDS), (SCI), (AMR),

(SPD), (LDO), (SPZ) ,

86)

, (RDA, GOR ) . RDA

local enterprise partnership(LEP) .

87) LDF 10

.

LDF , ,

.

(147)

(SA) . (DPD) , ,

, , .

LDF (procedural), (conformity),

,

. ,

,

, (AMR) . , LDF

) , ) , )

, )

.

(148)

LDF

( ) (

, , ) (

, , ) ( , )

4 .

, .

.

(149)

(150)

, , .

, 2004

. ,

, ,

. 1997 2010

,

. , 1998

RDA, GOR, RC( RA)

.

, ,

, .

. 2004

, , .

.

,

. ,

(planning permission) . 2004 LDF

(151)

. policy strategy program(or project)

. (sustainbility), (spatial planning), (community involvement)

.

, ,

. ,

, , (zoning)

, ,

.

,

(152)

(evidence-based plan) (implementation

plan) (monitoring) (management) (review)

.

, ,

- (City-region) .

, .

,

. .

,

.

(153)

.

(National Resource Planning Board) 1943

.

. ,

.

, .

89)

88) ( ) ( ) ,

4 .

(154)

1990 , , , , .

(regionalism) )

, )

, ) .

·

, (MetroNation) .

,

. ,

.

, .

(Council of Government: COG) .

(COG) 1950 50 2010 450

.⁹⁰⁾ 3 3

(155)

(Levy, 2010: 338). COG ,

. COG ( )

,

.

91)

(156)

92)

93)

(157)

, .

(158)

.

(Consolidated Plan: ConPlan) CDBG

,

.

1993 (HUD) CHAS

. 1995

4 ⁹⁴⁾

ConPlan .

ConPlan

,

. ) , ) 3

5 , ) 1 , )

, ) , )

· , ) , ) (Integratd Disbursement

and Information System: IDIS) .

ConPlan . ,

. , ConPlan

. ,

.

94) CDBG(Community Development Block Grant), HOME(Home Investment Partnerships), HOPWA(Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS), ESG(Emergency Shelter Grant)

(159)

, ConPlan

. , ConPlan , ConPlan

(Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report:

CAPER) .

CAPER ConPlan ,

. CAPER ConPlan (IDIS) .

95)

(160)

(161)

96)

4

,

· .

, .

,

.

, (5 ) (1 )

, .

96) .

Fact-based Assessment of Needs Explicit Strategy for Addressing the Needs Involve Citizens and Interest Groups Meaningfulle Ensure Coordination among Relevant Agencies.

(162)

(structure plan), (local plan) LDF(local development frameworks) .

,

. (evidence-based plan)

, (AMR)

. .

, .

·

· , .

,

.

(sub-region) ,

.

, , ,

(policy) (strategy)

, (project) .

PPG, RPG PPS, RSS

, LDF .

, ,

, · . ,

, .

(163)

, .

- ,

. ,

. CIADT, DATAR ,

, .

,

. (Office of Urban Affairs)

,

.

,

. CDBG

(Consolidated Plan) .

(CAPER) (IDIS)

.

(164)

, , , ·

(165)

.

. ,

.

. ,

2000 .

. ,

(conformity) .

.

, -

. 2003

, .

. (COG)

(ConPlan) ,

(IDIS)

.

(166)

(167)

·

?

, ?

? .

,

. 16

(168)

.

11 .

.

· < 6-1>

· , , ,

,

.

. .

.

. .

.

(169)

,

.

,

.

. ,

.

(170)

(171)

. ,

, .

. ,

. , .

, . ,

. , .

.

(172)

.

, .

,

( )

.

. , ,

,

. , , ,

.

, .

(173)

. ,

.

. ,

.

2003

97) .

· .

2009 , ,

3

.

(174)

1/3

, .

. ,

, , , ,

.

. .

. . ,

.

. (policy plan)

. ,

(175)

73.0% “ ” .

98) ,

. ,

.

. ,

.

(176)

.

, .

.

. .

, (

) .

. ,

.

. ,

.

. .

(177)

.

개편 기준 계획의 유형 계획체계 정비 특징

계획의 기능 성격( ) 과 정합성 확보

정책 계획

-:공간전략계획 지침계획, 사업 계획

-

공간위계별 계획 성격 및

-기능 차별화

정책 전략 사업간 위계

: , ,

계획간 정합성과 연계 강화 -

계획의 추진주체 -중앙정부의 지역계획

지방정부의 지역계획 -

계획 추진주체 명료화와

-집행의 책임성 강화

계획의 지방분권화 촉진 -

계획의 공간범역 지역단위 통합성

( ) -단일 행정구역 대상 계획

복수 행정구역 대상 계획

- -계획공간범역의 유연화 대응

, ·

.

, -

.

(5 ) .

(178)

. ,

.

, ⁹⁹⁾

2 ,

2 .

,

.

(179)

.

.¹⁰⁰⁾ , (policy

plan) (strategy) .

.

(functional region)

.¹⁰¹⁾

. 2000

.

. “

, ” 84.1%

.¹⁰²⁾

(180)

.

42% ,

30% .

.

2003 ·

,

. ·

. ,

·

, , ·

.¹⁰³⁾

.

·

. ,

.

· . ,

. ·

, ,

.

, .

(181)

· .

, .

, ·

(36.1%), (34.8%),

· , .

,

.

,

· .

(182)

CIADT DATAR ,

· .

DATAR

.

,

· .

, .

·

.

. .

(183)

.

,

, .

·

.

,

.

. , , ,

· , ·

(184)

. ( : KOPSS¹⁰⁴⁾, REDIS¹⁰⁵⁾ )

. ,

(IDIS) ,

. (CAPER)

. IDIS

, .

,

· .

.

·

. ‘ ( )’

.¹⁰⁶⁾ ,

(185)

.¹⁰⁷⁾

.

·

. ·

, .

· .

·

.

· .

,

, , ,

, .

. , ( ) , , ,

(186)

3 4 . .

. ,

,

.

, . ,

(evidence-based plan) .

108)

.

,

. · ·

.

(187)

.

, 2

85.8% “ ” .

.

· (2005 ),

(5 ) (1 ) ,

, .

(2004 ) (structure plan) (local plan)

(LDF) .

(188)

,

.

, .

. ,

(evidence-based plan)

(implementation plan) (monitoring) (management)

(review) .

.

(place-based planning) .

.

(189)

, .

. .

.

. .

, .

.

. ,

.

(190)

.

. ,

(48.1%), ·

(31.8%), (11.6%) .

, .

.

(191)

, .

, . ,

,

.

· .

,

. ,

.

109)

,

(Gateway Review) .¹¹⁰⁾

,

.

109) 6

110) (Gateway Review) , ·

. 5

. 6 .

(192)

( , ) .

,

‘ ’ .

,

.

, ,

. 5

. .

·

(193)

. ,

.

· · ,

5 10 . ,

.

(evidence-based plan) ,

. ,

.

,

. ,

,

111) .

(194)

, 64.8% “

”

“ ” .

. ,

,

.

111) (monitoring) ,

, . RMG(Regional Spatial

Strategy Monitoring: A Good Practice Guide, 2005) ‘ ,

’ ( , 2009).

(195)

.¹¹²⁾

, .

20 1 ¹¹³⁾

. .¹¹⁴⁾

. 82%

.

(30.0%),

112) , [ 3]

113) 20 1 “

” .

114) 2010 1 , ,

, , ,

, .

(196)

(19.0%) . ,

. -

.

,

.

. , .

. ,

· .

. , .

DATAR¹¹⁵⁾ , ,

115) DATAR( ) 1963

2005 12 (DIACT) . 2009

12 DATAR( (attractiveness) )

. DIACT

.

(197)

,

. , .

, .

-

. , .

.

, . DATAR

,

.

, .

(198)

DATAR

, ( )

.

, .

7 ¹¹⁶⁾ ,

.

. . (multi-area agreements)

.¹¹⁷⁾

, ,

.

,

(199)

. ,

72.6% “

” .

.

. 16

, ,

.

. ,

, .

.¹¹⁸⁾

.

, .

(200)

. .

. ,

.

, .

, , . ,

.

. ¹¹⁹⁾

.

,

(41.2%),

(37.3%), (14.6%) .