• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

IEG 환경지질연구정보센터

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IEG 환경지질연구정보센터"

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)‚]æ~>Æ·~ã²æ. òY. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004. ~>Òæ~ Æ·BïÒ Ï F8žê ³£~ WO ËKö ‚ \. ªfêÁšÒ. BÞã&v ~㦠A Study on the Adsorption of Organophosphorus Pesticides Applying Sewage Sludge to Soil Amendment. Á. Eun Jin Lim Jai-Young Lee Dept. of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul. ABSTRACT This study has been assessed the influence of applying sewage sludge to soil amendments on the sorption properties, and leaching potential of three commonly used organophosphorus pesticides, Diazinon, Fenitrothion, and Chlorpyrifos. A sandy soil with a low content of organic carbon was treated with sewage sludge with a ratio sandy soil : sludge ratio of 30:1. The sorption was determined with the batch equilibrium technique. The sorption isotherms could be described by Freundlich equation. The Freundlich constant, K value which measures sorption capacity, were 3.97, 9.94, 22.48 for Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos in non-amended soil. But in amended soil, K value was 12.58, 28.47, and 61.21 for Diazinon, Fenitrothion, and Chlorpyrifos. The overall effect of sewage sludge addition to soil was to increase pesticides adsorption, due to the high sorption capacity of the organic matter. The effect of sludge on the leaching of pesticides in the soil was studied using packed soil columns. Total recoveries of pesticides in soil and leachate with leaching in soil column, were in the range of about 73~84%, was reduced with the passage of time. Diazinon moved more rapidly than Chlorpyrifos in the unamended soil due to greater sorption and lower water solubility of Chlorpyrifos. Total amounts of pesticides leached from the sewage sludge amended soils were significantly reduced when compared with unamended soils. This reduction may be mainly due to and increase in sorption in amended soils, as a consequence of the increase in the organic matter content. Key words : Pesticides, Sorption, Leaching, Soil amendments, Sewage sludge. º £ ^.  ’º ~>Òæ¢ Æ·Bï҂ 'Ïö 8ž ^ &æ F8žê ³£ Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos~ W OßWö &~ ªC~& . F8žê ³£ WOþ Ö", ³£ WO Nf Freundlich š ¾ ~ . Freundlich ç> 7 ~¾ž Nf Î ³£öB 1ö &HÚ >~¢ &b¾, F8> Žïš Ã&†>ƒ Freundlich ç>8ž N 8f 6²~& . $‚ FreundlichöB WOËj ¾æÚº K8f ³£~ >ö &‚ Ϛê& 6²†>ƒ Ã&~& b–, Æ·ö Òæ¢ Î&‚ òöBº(Soil-Sludge) Æ·Ú F8> Žï~ Ã&‚ ³£ WOïf Òæ& Î&> æ pf ò(A-Soil)ö jš 2~48 ;ê Ã&~& . Æ·[j Î҂ Æ·

(2) "öB ³£~ Ï ßWf >ö &‚ Ϛê& – ³£¢>ƒ Ï jNf Ã&~& . $‚ Æ·ö Òæ& Î&Nö 8¢ Æ·Ú F8> Žï Ã&~š Æ·öB ³£ WOïš Ã&>Ú ³£š Æ·~[b‚ ŽR& ÛB, ³£~ Ïî ;ê& 6²~& . *Ú : F8žê ³£, WO, Ïî, Æ·BïÒ, ~>Òæ *Corresponding author : [email protected] : 2004. 2. 2 : 2004. 3. 15 : 2004. 6. 30. ö%>¢ î~ # Æ~. ²Òߞ¢ Hæ. 95.

(3) ªfêÁšÒ. 96. 1.. * †. j ~>Òæ Bïf 5,216Ê/¢‚ 2003j 7ú ¦V ~>Òæ 㚠.æNb‚Ž ~>Òæ '; ¾Ò Onš ;’> ® . ~> Òæ~ Ò‚Ï O» b‚º ’² ZVbj šÏ~º VF" FVbj šÏ~ º VF‚ ’ª† > ® . ZVbj šÏ~º VF‚º ~Þz, ãò, Ï[Ò¾ š ®b–, FVbj šÏ ~º VF‚º ªš, ‡z, Æ·Bï҂ šÏ~º VF š ® . š7 F#š¾ “öBº ~>Òæ¢ FVW Æ·Bï҂~ šÏš Ã&~ ®º º^š . *Ò ÖÒ¾¢öB B>º Òæ~ ãÖ &¦ª ~Þò ‚ šÏ> ®b–, FVW Æ·Bï҂ ~>Òæ š Ïf ÒæÚ FVbîš Æ· ’– Ëç, Æ· Ž 6 ², ·b Öïj Ã&¢º š6š ®röê ®’~, ~>Òæö ŽB 7.³ b‚ ž‚ Æ· J"j Ö J~, FVW Æ·Bï҂ ~>Òæ~ šÏf j ‚ ;š . Òæ¢ šÏ‚ Æ·Bïf Æ·Ú  Ã&, Æ· & ê(Bulk Density) 6², >ª FK Ã& ~ Æ· ’ –¢ æzÎ . $‚ Òæ¢ Û‚ ÆæBïf Æ·Ú öB ³£~ ªVö &~ ³£~ ‡O ßWöê 'Ë j ~² B . ¢>'b‚ ³£š Æ·ö F«>š,  bö ~‚ ªš, >B, ‚š 7ªš, Æ·Ú ‡O b ‚ ² >Vê ~¾, ;Ö& F«F ãÖ ‚šFÂ" Ï îö ~š ž¦Æ·" æ~>‚ šÿ~ Æ·ê öò j . ³£~ ‡ î¢ >ê~ J"j ¢bÒ > ®. Of ³£~ bö &‚ Ϛê, W, ª¶ï 5 Æ·~ ·šN ~~Ïïö 'Ëj Ab¾, "‚ Æ· 7 FVb Žïö ~š‚ . šº FVb Žïš ¸f Æ·¢>ƒ Æ ·Ú FVbš ³£~ ‡>Ò †j ~V r^ö ³£~ šÿj æÊV r^š . ¾ ÖÒ¾¢ Æ·f F Vb Žïš 'f ÒîÆ·š ôj ³£j ‡Oʺ Ë Kš 'f–ê ®’~, ‚" *Ë 5 –ãæ~ Ã& ‚ *Ë º: ^¢ *š ³£ Úïf Ã&~ ® Ú ³£b‚ ž‚ æ~> 5 ~Â>~ J"š ÖJ> ® . š‚ ^B¢ &6ÊV *š ~> Òæ¢ F Vb Æ·Bï҂ 'ÏÚb‚Ž, Æ· Bïf b† æ 7öB ³£~ ‡Oj Ãê* ³£b‚ ž‚ æ~> 5 ~Â>~ J"j Oæʺ– êæš >Ò¢ ÒòB . V¢B  ’öBº J~> ¾ÒËöB j‚ š–~> Òæ¢ 7b‚ ~>Òæ~ bÒ'Áz' ßW 2 k 5 7.³ ÏÂþj Û~ FVW Æ·Bï҂ ~> 2002. 13). 3,5,17). 2,6,11,22,27). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004. Òæ~ 'Ï &ËWj V~, Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos 3&æ FVžê ³£b‚ ~>Òæ~ Æ· BïÒ 'Ïö Vž š ³£~~ ‡OËj ï&~¶ ‚ . 2.. Òò 5 O». þÒò ~>Òæº J~>¾ÒË~ š– ~>Òæ(Ž>j: 9%)¢ šÏ~&b–, Æ·ò(š~, A-Soil)º ‚Æ 30 cm öB j~ ³š~& . š Òæ 5 A-Soilf 2 mm (No. 10 sieve)Ú¢ Û"B ò¢ šÏ~ þj >¯~ & . A-Soil 5 Òæ~ z' ßWj 2k~V *š pH (H O)º 1:5», ·šN ~~Ïï(CEC)f 1M CH COONH »ö V¢ G;~&b–, A-soil 5 Òæ~ bÒz' Wîf Table 1, 2f ? . FVbŽï(Organic Matter, O.M) f Walkey-Black»j šÏ~ FVê²(Organic Carbon, O.C.)ïj ’‚ ê, Eq. 1j šÏ~ FVb Žïj Ö ;~& . O.M. (%) = 0.35 + 1.8Ü%O.C. (1) ~>Òæ~ 7.³ Žïf öVb ;þ»ö &~  G;~&b–, Òæ bö Vž Æ·~ R>ê> æ z¢ G;~V *š ASTM D-5887»j šÏ~& .. þö ÒÏB FVžê ³£f Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chloropyrifosš . 2.1.. 2. 3. 4. Diazinon(O,O-diethyl-O-2-isopropyl-6-methylpyrimidin-4-. f ÚëW II~ ÚÏB‚B bö &‚ Ïšêº 40 mg/l(20 C)š–, Fenitrothion(O,O-dimethylO-4-nitro-m-tolyl-phosphorothioate)f Ϛê(20 C)º 21 mg/l ‚ ÚëW IV‚ ëWš Ôf ³£š . $‚ Chlorpyrifos yl-phosphorothioate). o. o. (O,O-diethyl-O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl)-phosphorothioate). º bö &‚ Ϛê(20 C)º 2 mg/l, ÚëW Ib‚ ;‚ ëWj †º bîš . š ³£~ £Bº Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH~ Fenitrothion(Purity 98.5%)f Sigma Aldrich~ Diazinon(Purity 99%), Chlorpyrfos (Purity 99.2%) j Acetoneö Ÿ 1,000 µg/ml‚ Standard Solutions¢ o. Table 1. Physical and Chemical Properties of the Soils Type. Texture. pH. A-Soil SW-SC − Sand. 5.26 5.7. Organic Matter (%) 1.65 0.42. Organic Carbon (%) 0.72 0.04. CEC (meq/100g) 10.5 1.9.

(4) ~>Ò

(5) æ~ Æ·BïÒ Ï F8žê ³£~ WO ËKö R \. 97. Table 2. Chemical Properties of the Sludge (mg/kg) Chemical Properties. pH. As. Cd. Cr. Cu. Pb. Hg. J Sludge. 6.5. N.D.. N.D.. 0.023. 0.035. N.D.. N.D.. Organic Matter (%) 43.2%. Organic Carbon (%) 23.81%. C/N Ratio. CEC (meq/100g). 8.0. 51.5. Table 3. Properties of Pesticides. Diazinon Fenitrothion Chlorpyrifos. Chemical Composition C12H21N2O3PS C9H12NO5PS C9H11Cl3NO3PS. Water Solubility (20oC) 40 mg/l 21 mg/l 2 mg/l. Ü Ü Ü. 304.35 277.24 350.59. B–~&b–, š >î~ z' ßWf ? . 2.2.. Vapor Pressure (mmHg) 1.4 10−4 (20oC) 6 10−6 (20oC) 1.87 10−5 (25oC). M.W.. Half Life (Day) 32 10 20. ". Table 3. þO». 2.2.1 Batch Test. WO þf Æ·(A-Soil) 5 Æ·:Òæ=30:1(š~ Soil-Sludge) b> 3 g" 30 ml~ ³£ χj 40 ml Polypropylene öªÒ&ö I 20Û1 CöB 180 rpm b‚ 24* “N êû~& . "«B ³£~ ³êº 0.1~15 mg/l‚ šN;ê¢ ¢;~² ~V*š Standard Solutionsj 0.01 M CaCl ‚ \C~& . Òς ³£ 7 >ö &‚ Ϛê& ·f Chlorpyrifosº >ö &‚ Ϛ ê¢ ¸šV *š Ϛê(2 mg/L) º*& ½Ú¾º ³ê öBº 1%~ Methanolš ŽF>êƒ ~& . >wš ƒÂ êöº 5,000 rpmöB 20ª* öªÒ~  ç‡j ~ ªCò‚ ÒÏ~& . V‚ þ j ~ šr Òς ³£~ ·" ç‡ 7~ ³£~ ·~Nš¢ WOB ·b‚ êÖ~& . Òæ FV> Žïö &‚ ³£~ WO Î"¢ V *š R&Ò(š~ Sand)f R&Ò-Òæ(š~ SandSludge)& 30:1‚ B b>j *~ O»" ÿ¢~² W Oþj ~& . š r Soil-Sludge, Sand-Sludge~ FV> Žï(O.M.)f '' 3.03%, 1.85%š& . o. 2. 2.2.2 Column Test(Reaching Test). º Fig. 1" ?š Úã 2.5 cm, ^š 35 cm ž j’Ú

(6) "j šÏ~ ò¢ Ïê~ >¯~& . Æ· Columnf Column *Ú¢ A-Soil‚ jb–, Ò æ&

(7) ŽB Columnf Column 禺 10 cmº Batch Test~ jf ?š Sludge:A-Soil~ j& 1:30š >êƒ –.~&b–, ~¦ 20 cmº A-Soil‚ Ïê~& . ' Column Test. Fig. 1. The schematic diagram of the column tester. Table 4. Experimental Conditions of the Leaching Experiment Soil Column Length, L (cm) Cross-sectional area (cm2) Pore volume (cm3) Porocity, n Bulk density ρb (g/cm3) Microsopic Velocity, v (cm/hr) Macrosopic Velocity, vs (cm/hr). Conditions 30.0 4.9 80.0 0.54 1.1 4.1 7.5. Æ·

(8) "f 0.01 M CaCl ‚

(9) zÎ r, '' ³£ š 2.5 mgš ŽF‚ bÏ‡j Æ·~ ç¦Ršö &~  0.01 M CaCl χb‚ 1, 3, 5, 7 5 10 Pore Volume (PV)‚ Peristaltic Pump¢ šÏ~ ÏÂ8 . F³ê 2. 2. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004.

(10) ªfêÁšÒ'. 98. º 25 ml/hr‚ Fæ~&b–, Ï ê, Ï ‡",

(11) " 5 pš ê‚ Æ·ò¢ j~ Æ· 7 º~³£ ³ ê¢ G;~& . Column~ ^¦Ò“f Table 4f ? .. cm. ³£~ ªC 5 ²>N öB χ 7 ³£~ ºÂf ò 25 mlö Dechloromethane 50ml,

(12) z NaCl χ 25 ml &~ 2ª* êû ê ;~Î ê Dechloromethane[j j~  ²* ÃB ³»V‚ Ï & 5 ml ;ê Îj r ræ ³»~& . Column Test~ Æ·òº U.S EPA Method 3545~ PFE(Pressurized Fluid Extraction)ö V¢ Úç ò¢ ºÂ~& . ºÂö Òς Ëjº DIONEXÒ ASE200j šÏ~&b– ºÂ –· –šf Table 5f ? . šê ³»‡j ‚WzB Florisil Columnj Û"* ;B~&b–, ;B ";f *Ë ³£ º~ï þO» (“ã~ã’ö, 2001)j šÏ~& . ³£ º~ïf GC/ MS(Agilent 6890 GC-5973N MSD)‚ ªC~& . GC

(13) "f Capillary HP-5MS(Length : 30 m, Thickness : 0.25 µm, Diameter : 0.25 mm, Agilent Technologies)j ÒÏ ~&b–, "«’ Nêº 230 C, J6Nêº ßNªCj ~V *š, 180 CöB 2ª* Fæ ê 180 CöB 220 C‚ 10 C/minb‚ ßN‚ ê 2ªFæ ~& . Carrier Gasº He (99.999%)b‚ Column Flow Rateº 1.0 ml/min‚ ~& . ³£~ ²>Nþf Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos ¢ Æ· ò 5 > òöB  ’öB šÏ‚ Methods¢ šÏ~ ~& . Æ·ö &‚ ³£~ ²>Nþf þöB Òς Æ·ò ' 10 gö çV ³£~ ³ê& 1 mg/kg, 10 mg/kgš >êƒ ³£j "«~ ò¢ –B~&b–, > òº 0.01 M CaCl ö çV ³£š 1 mg/lf 10 mg/l& >êƒ "«‚ ê þj >¯~ ²>Nj ’~& . ³£~ ²>Nf Æ· òöBº 89%~92% º*&, 2.2.3. Batch Test. o. o. o. o. o. 2. Table 5. ASE 200 Conditions Items Oven temp. Pressure Oven heat-up time Static time Flush volume Nitrogen purge Solvent. Conditions 100oC 14 MPa 5 min 5 min 60% of Extraction cell volume 1MPa for 60s Dichloromethane:Acetone=1:1. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004. > òöBº 91%~95% º*‚ ³£~ «~ö V¢ – Nšº šæ p~b–, jv' ·^‚ ²>Nj & . 3.. Ö # 8. ~>Ò

(14) æ~ Æ· BïÒ Ï &Ë9 8  \öB šÏ‚ ~>Òæº &êöB B‚ Ò æ¢ š–* Òς Òæ‚B ~>Òæ

(15) ŽB 7 .³ïf Table 2f ?b– öV>Ò»öB ;‚ FV W Jî j ÆæBïÒ 5 ãJ ÆÏê‚~ ҂ Ï O»ö ‚  ¦?Æ V&~ & / 5 ¾/ jL~&j H, V&~ 'f >~& . šº J~> Ò æË~ ãÖ ‚ ~>òš ~>¾ÒËb‚ F«>Ú ~ >ÒæÚö 7.³ Žïš Ö '² šÒ~º ©b‚ ž . 8¢B J~> ¾ÒË Òæ~ ãÖ Òæ Ú~ 7.³b‚ ž‚ Æ·J"f 'j ©b‚ ÒòB . Òæ~ pHº 6.5‚ 7Wö &rb–, FV> Žï f 43.2%‚ öV> Ò» V&~~ 25%šç  1.5 V šç ’² G;>îb– 7ö FÛ>º FVW jò ~ FV> Žï(30~50%) jL®j H, F҂ >~¢ š ® . Æ· 5 Òæ b jNj ҂ Òæ b Æ· öB~ 4>ê>~ G; Öº Table 6 ? . Òæ b jNf Òæ 5 Æ·~ j& '' 1: 30, 5 1: 20š >êƒ –.~& . A-Soil~ 4>ê>º 4.9Ü10 cm/s‚ ¾æÒb¾ Sludge Î&ïš £ 3.3%(Soil:Sludge = 1:30)¢ Hº 6.2Ü10 cm/sš&b–, 5%(Soil:Sludge = 1:20)Î&~&j Hº 8.8Ü10 cm/s‚ Òæ Î&ï à &ö 8¢ 4>ê>& Ã&~& . Òæ Î&ö 8ž 4 >ê> Ã&º Òæ~ «êªC ¾*, Fig. 2‚ J« † > ® . Òæ~ «êª

(16) ªC Ö Òæº Sandy Soil‚ ª~>îb– 8¢B «¶ ’V& B 4 >ê>& Ã&‚ ©b‚ ž . $‚ Òæö

(17) ŽB F V>f Æ· «¶¢ b~ Æ·«¶ Қ¢ ^"º †j ~æ‚ Æ·~ «z¢ /ê† > ®Ú *š ã F>ƒ Òæ& "«B Æ·~ 4>Wf Ëç>Ò ¢ ÒòB . 3.1.. −5. −5. −5. Ö  \öB ³£ WOËf ³£ WO\öB %º*~ ² ÒÏ>º Freundlich WO N(Eq. 2)j 'Ï~& . 3.2. Batch Test. log q = log K + N logC. (2).

(18) ~>Ò

(19) æ~ Æ·BïÒ Ï F8žê ³£~ WO ËKö R \. 99. Table 6. Hydraulic Conductivity of A-Soil and Soil-Sludge Samples A-Soil Soil:Sludge=1:30 Soil:Sludge=1:20. Hydraulic Conductivity (cm/sec) 4.9 10−5 6.2 10−5 8.8 10−5. Ü Ü Ü. Fig. 2. The grain size distribution curves of the sludge.. VB qº * Æ· Z² WOB ³£~ ·(mg/kg), C º WOï; ê~ ³£~ ³ê(mg/l), Kf Nf Freundlich ç>š . Kº ' Æ·ö &‚ ³£~ WO Ïïj ¾æÚº æ R‚ K8š š>ƒ ³£~ WOïê Ã&Žj r > ®. . Nf χ 7 ï;³êf WOï Қ~ çFW ;ê ¢ ¾æÞ . ' Æ·öB ³£~ Freundlich WON j Fig. 3ö ê~&, WO Nb‚¦V \‚ WO ç>º Table 7? . ³£ «~ê K8j jLš š, Pesticides 1.0~15 mg/l ³ê º*öBº Diazinon~ ãÖ Æ· ê‚ 0.40~ 12.58, Fenitrothion 0.53~28.47, Chlorpyrifos 0.69~61.21. b‚ Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos Bb‚ WOK š Ã&~& . Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos~ >ö &‚ Ϛ ê(20 C)º 40 mg/l, 21 mg/l, 2 mg/l‚, >ö &‚ Ϛ ê& 'j>ƒ, K8f Ã& ~& . šº Æ·öB Kim " Feagley ~ ³£ WOKf >ö &‚ Ϛê& 'f ³£¢>ƒ K 8f Ã&‚ º f ¢~~& . ÆW ê K8j jvš š FV> Žïš Ã&†>ƒ ³£~ o. 18). Fig. 3. Adsorption Isotherms for Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos.. 8š Ã&~&º–, ß® FV> Žïš 0.4%ž Sandö B~ Diazinon 0.4, Fenitrothion 0.53, Chlorpyrifos 0.69‚ ® ·f 8j &b¾, Sandö Sludge¢ "« ‚ Sand-SludgeÆ·öBº FV> Žïš £ 1.8%‚ à &Žö V¢ ³£~ K8f Diazinon 7.85, Fenitrothion 16.37, Chlorpyrifos 35.17b‚ ’² Ã&Žj " > ®î K. Table 7. Freundlich Equation Parameters of the Pesticides Pesticide Contents. A-Soil. 1/n K R2. 1.16 3.97 0.98. Diazinon SoilSand Sludge 1.04 1.30 12.58 0.4 0.99 0.98. SandSludge 1.06 7.85 0.95. A-Soil 1.03 9.94 0.99. Fenitrothion SoilSand Sludge 0.90 1.24 28.47 0.53 0.98 0.97. SandSludge 0.99 16.37 0.99. A-Soil 0.98 22.48 0.94. Chlorpyrifos SoilSand Sludge 0.80 1.10 61.21 0.97 0.98 0.86. SandSludge 0.97 35.17 0.98. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004.

(20) ªfêÁšÒ. 100. . $‚ A-SoilöB~ FV> Žïf 1.6%‚ ÖÒ¾¢ ¢>' Æ·~ FV> Žï 1.5%~2.0% >&b‚ A-Soilö Sludge¢ 30:1‚ "«Žb‚Ž 3%;ê‚ FV> Žïš Ã&~&b–, ³£~ K8 $‚ Diazinon~ ãÖ 3.97öB 12.58‚, Fenitrothionf 9.94öB 28.47b‚, Chlorpyrifos º 22.48öB 61.21b‚ Ã&Žj {ž † > ®î . š º Æ· 7 FV> Žïš Ã&†>ƒ ‡Oïš Ã&‚. º Graber ~ f ¢~~& . Freundlich ç>ž N 8f Æ· 7ö ‡OB ³£~ ·" >7 ï; ³£ ³ ê Қ~ F; ¾æÞ ©b‚ Wauchope ö ~ ~š FV> Žïš – Æ·¢>ƒ 1 ·, FV> Ž ïš ·f Æ·¢>ƒ 1 – >~¢ ž  ‚ .  þöBº FV> Žïš ç&'b‚ ¸f SoilSludgeöB~ ³£~ Nf 0.80~1.04~ 8j, FV> Žï š 'f SandöBº 1.10~1.30~ 8j &b– ³£~ >ö &‚ Ϛê& 6²†>ƒ N 8f 6²~& . 12). 27). Ö Æ·

(21) " pšê F‡öB~ Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos~ ³ê ª

(22) º Fig. 4, 5, 6" ? . b& A-Soil ColumnöB Æ· º~~º ³£~ ·" ŽÂ‡b‚ FÂB ·j ‚ Soil ColumnöB *Ú ² >Nj ÚÚš Diazinon~ ãÖ 1PV, 3PV, 5PV, 7PV, 10PVöB '' £ 84%, 82%, 79%,78%, 74%b‚ Ïî š ê¯Nö V¢ ²>Nf ² 6²~& . šº ³£ «~ 5 Æ· Sample V¢B – Nšº šæ p~ . 10PV¢ r, "«B ³£~ ·ö &‚ Æ·

(23) " ç¦ 10cm pšö º~~º ³£·f Diazinon~ ãÖ A-Soil 5 Soil-SludgeöB '' 20.6%, 34%, Fenitrothionf 33.3%, 49.8%, Chlorpyrifosº 47.9%, 64.3%š& . ³ £ «~ê Ïî ;ê¢ ÚÚš Diazinon, Fenitrothion, ChlorpyrifosBb‚ Ïî ;ê& 6²~&º–, Freundlich Isotherm öB K8š š>ƒ Ïî ;ê& ·~ . ³£ê Ïî ;êº ³£~ >Òz' ßWš¾ ª¶ïö ~š B Ö;>º >BW, ϚW " &ê& ® .  þj >¯~º ";öBº ³£~ >Bj Oæ~V *š &/ ~ þj >¯~&bæ‚,  ’öB ³£ «~ê Ï î ;ê~ Nšº ³£~ bö &‚ ϚW NšöB B ~º ©š¢ ÒòB . V¢B bö &‚ Ϛê& jv' – Diazinon(Water Solubility, 40 mg/l)š Fenitrothion (Water Solubility, 20 mg/l) 5 Chlorpyrifos(Water Solubility, 2 mg/l)ö jš Ïî ;ê& – ©b‚ ÒòB . Æ· Sampleê‚ ÚÚš Òæ&

(24) ŽB Column 3.3. Column Test. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004. Fig. 4. Conc. of Diazinon through the A-Soil and Soil-Sludge.. Fig. 5. Conc. of Fenitrothion through the A-Soil and Soil-Sludge.. š Òæ&

(25) Ž>æ pº Column(A-Soil)  Ïî ;ê& '² ¾æÒ . šº Æ· –š ¯ F Vb Žïš ôf –šöB ³£š Æ·ö ‡O>º ·š. (Soil-Sludge).

(26) ~>Ò

(27) æ~ Æ·BïÒ Ï F8žê ³£~ WO ËKö R \. 101. Table 8. Retardation Factor, R, for the Percolation of Pesticides Pesticides Diazinon Fenitrothion Chlorpyrifos. Samples A-Soil Soil-Sludge A-Soil Soil-Sludge A-Soil Soil-Sludge. Distribution Doefficient, K 3.97 12.58 9.94 28.48 22.48 61.21. Retardation Factors, R 9.0 26.2 20.9 58.1 46.1 123.8. Rò¢ æ>Ú –ÿ‚ º aj ¾æÞ . ³£ê A-Soil 5 Soil-Sludge~ æê>º Diazinon öB 9.0, 26.2, Fenitrothion 20.9, 58.1, Ò Chlorpyrifos 46.1, 123.8‚ Òæ&

(28) ŽB òöBº FVb Žï~ Ã&‚ ž~ Retardation Factor& Òæ&

(29) Ž>æ pº òö jš 2~2.5V ;ê Ã&Žj " > ®î . 7). 4. Fig. 6. Conc. of Chlorpyrifos through the A-Soil and Soil-Sludge. ôbæ‚ Æ·~[b‚ ŽR& ÛB>Ú Sludge&

(30) ŽB öB ³£~ Ïî ;ê& 6²B ©b‚ ž. . š‚ Ö"ºArienzo(1994), Sanchez(1997) ’ö Bê " > ®º–, Diazinonj•‚ FVžê ³£~ Æ ·öB~ ‡Of Æ·Ú FVb Žïö "‚ ~š‚  ~&b–, ß® Chlorpyrifos, Fenitrothion, Diazinon" ?f Hydrophobic‚ bîf "‚ Hydrophobic Bond¢ Û~ Æ· 5 Òæ~ Humic acid 5 Fulvic acid~ OH, COOHf ?f "º ·ÏVö ‡Oš šÚ^ Ïî ;ê& 6²‚  J«~ ® .  ’~ Soil Column –šöB~ ³£ 5 Æ· « ~ê æê>(Retardation Factor)º Eq. 3 šÏ~ ’ ~&b–, Table 8öB Retardation Factor¢ ¾æÚî . Soil-Sludge. 8,16). ρb R=1 + -----K n. (3). VB, K : Freundlich Isotherm Parameter b : BÚ~ ¯V &ê(ML ) n : BÚ~ † ρ -----K f Æ·[~ ‡OËj ϗʺ – jº‚ Ïî ~ nÚ'j ~‚ . Vö 1j z~š :‚ æê>& B . š æê>~ ~º Æ·[ ÚöB –ÿ~º J "bî~ ³ê& j>w Ï æ~>~  F³ −3. b. Ö V.  ’öBº ~>Òæ~ ¶özNj ¸šV *‚ Onb‚ J~> ¾ÒËöB j‚ š– ~>Òæ¢ 7 b‚ ~>Òæ~ bÒ'Áz' ßW 2k 5 7. ³ ÏÂþj Û~ FVW Æ·Bï҂ ~>Òæ~ 'Ï &ËWj V ~& . $‚ ~>Òæ¢ Æ·Bï ҂ 'Ïf Æ·öB ³£~ ªVö 'Ëj † > ® bæ‚ *Ò –ãæ 5 *ËöB ÒÏ>º Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Chlorpyrifos 3&æ FVžê ³£b‚ ~> Òæ~ Æ·BïÒ 'Ïö Vž š ³£~~ ‡OË j ï&~& .  ’ Ö"º r" ? . 1) J~>¾ÒË Òæ~ ãÖ &¦ª ê~>& F« Nb‚Ž ~>ÒæÚ 7.³ Žïf V&~ š~‚ ¾ æ¾, ~>Òæ‚ ž‚ Æ· 7.³ J"f 'j ©b ‚ ÒòB . $‚ Òæ~ FVb Žïf £ 43%‚  7ö FÛ>º FVW jò 30~50%f jv~&j r F ҂ >&¢ š ® . $‚ ~>Òæ¢ Æ·BïÒ ‚ 'Ï Æ· ’–~ R>Wj Ëç*, Æ·[~ V > Î"¢ ÃêÒ > ®bÒ¢ ÒòB . 2) ³£~ ‡Oþö šÏB Æ·~ FVb Žïf 1.65% ;ê‚ FVb Žïš 'f ÒîÆ&b–, ~>Ò æ¢ Æ·ö 1:30 jN‚ Î&~&j r, 3% ;ê~ FVb Žïj & . FVžê ³£ ‡Oþ Ö" ³ £ ‡O Nf Freundlich š ¾ ~ . Freundlich ç> 7 ~¾ž Nf Î ³£öB 1ö &rÚ >~¢ Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004.

(31) ªfêÁšÒ. 102. &b¾, FV> Žïš ç&'b‚ ¸f Soil-Sludgeö B~ ³£~ Nf 0.80~1.04~ 8j, FV> Žïš 'f SandöBº 1.10~1.30~ 8j &b– ³£~ >ö &‚ Ϛê& 6²†>ƒ N 8f 6²~& . $‚ Freundlich öB WOËj ¾æÚº K8f ³£~ >ö &‚ Ϛ ê& 6²†>ƒ Ã&~&b–, Æ·ö Òæ¢ Î&‚ òöBº(Soil-Sludge) Æ· Ú FV> Žï~ Ã&‚ ³£ WOïf Òæ& Î&>æ pf ò(A-Soil)ö j š 2~4V ;ê Ã&~& . 3) Æ·[j Î҂ Æ· "öB ³£~ Ï ßWf >ö &‚ Ϛê& – ³£¢>ƒ Ï jNf Ã&~&. . šº >ö &‚ Ϛê& – ³£¢>ƒ Æ·ÚöB šÿWš Ã&>Ú ³£š ž¦~ãb‚ FÂF &ËWš. î > ®Ú æ~> 5 æ‚>¢ J"Ò > ®bæ‚ Ïšê& – ³£ Òφ Höº "~& jº~Ò¢  . $‚ Æ·ö Òæ& Î&Nö 8¢ Æ·Ú FVb Žï çßb‚ Æ·öB ³£ WOïš Ã&>Ú ³£š Æ· ~[b‚ ŽR& ÛB, ³£~ Ïî ;ê& 6²~& . 8¢B ‚" ³ãæ, *Ë 5 –ãæ~ ³£ ÒÏ Ã& ‚ ž‚ æ~> 5 ~Â>~ ³£ J" ^B¢ ~>Ò æ¢ Æ·Bï҂ šÏŽb‚Ž Æ·Ú FVb Žïj Ã&Úb‚Ž Æ·~ ³£ WOï Ã&‚ æ~> 5 æ ‚>~ ³£ J" &ËWf 6²~Ò¢ ÒòB .  ’öB Òς ~> Òæº ²z Òæ¢ î> ê š–~ Òς Òæ‚B š ~> Òæ¢ ¦?z ";š¾ jz ";j –ö Òφ ãÖ ¦ z ®îš ±f FVW Æ·Bï҂ ÒϚ &Ë~Ò¢ ÒòB . 8¢B ³â¦ jò&Ò»ö ~~ ³ãæöB ~>Ò æ~ FVî jò‚~ ÒÏf ®&Ë~æò, 7Öæ" ?š FVb Žïš 'f ¿;‚ Æ·š¾, Қ .B¦, –ãæ 5 *ËöB ~>Òæ¢ ÒÏ Žb‚Ž b Ú~ ·ª /f b†, Æ·Ú  Ã&, Æ· &ê (Bulk Density) 6², >ª FK Ã&f ?š :²ç‚ Æ· ’–¢ ;W~º– êæj * > ®bÒ¢ ÒòB .. Ò Ò š ’º 2003jê BÞã&v F’–Wjö ~~ ’>îb–, š~ æöö 6Òãî .. ^^ò 1.. ]ã~ã\ö, îRÚ Æ·J">î 8&J; 5 þO. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004. »ö ‚ \UNIER No. 2001-31-623 (2001). B, BÏz, B;‚, ;?, “³£~ Æ· RšFÂö & ‚ ’-

(32) ËöB ¶;Öö ~‚ Captafol~ FÂßW”, ~ã³z²æ B 39² B 6^, pp. 488-493 (1996). 3. Æ·, ¦" ^zÒ(2000). 4. ö"æO~ã&ÒÓ, 2001, 2001j *Ë ³£º~ï  –Ò 5 BF&k. 5. J¾ã, fF", ²', šÎÂ, “Ò

(33) æ¢ šÏ~ ւ žÆ·~ ßW”, ‚“~ã³²æ, pp. 200-204 (1998). 6. ;'^, fËÛ, f;‚, š', ª~~, îË*, ‚³£ , î*

(34) Ê, pp. 341-352 (2000). 7. ‚;ç, ‚ R, 3Nö æ~>Ξ" wÏ, ;'Ò, pp. 1119-. 2.. 1125, 1176-1182 (1999). 8. Arienzo, M., and Sanchez-Camazano, M.J., “Effect of soil characteristics on adsorption and mobility of (14C)-Diazinon”, J. Agric. Food Chem., No 42, pp. 1803-1808 (1994). 9. Cox, L., Celis, R., Hermosin, M.C., Cornejo, J., Zsolney A., and Zeller, K., “Effect of organics amendments on herbicide sorption as related to the nature of the dissolved organic matter”, Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, pp. 4600-4605 (2000). 10. Freeze, R., Cherry J. Groundwater, Prentice Hall, pp. 402413 (1979). 11. Glotfelty, D.E., McChesney, C.J., Sagebiel, J.C., and Seiber, J.N., “Studies of the distribution, drift, and volatilization of diazinon resulting from spray application to a dormant peach orchard”, Chemosphere, pp. 1303-1314 (1990). 12. Graber, E.R., Sluszny, C., Gerstl, Z., “Influence of sludge amendment on transport and sorption Ideality of S-Triazines in Soil Columns”, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16(12), pp. 2463-2469 (1997). 13. Graber, E.R., Dror, I., Bercovich, F.C., and Rosner, M., “Enhanced transport of pesticide in a field trial with treated sewage sludge”, Chemosphere 805-811 (2001). 14. Hantush, M.M., Mario, M.A., and Islam, M.R., “Models for leaching of pesticides in soil and groundwater”, Journal of Hydrology, 227, pp. 66-83 (2000). 15. Hemond, H., Fechner E., “Chemical fate and transport in the Environment”, Academic Press, pp. 200-204 (1993). 16. Iglesias-Jimenez, E., Sanchez-Martin, M.J., and SanchezCamazano, M., “Pesticide adsorption in a soil-water system in the presence of surfactants”, Chemospere, 32(9), pp. 1771-1782 (1996). 17. Kim, H., Principles of soil chemistry, Maecel Dekker Inc, pp. 450-453 (1998). 18. Kim, J. H., Feagley, S.E., “Adsorption and leaching of Trifluralin, Metolachlor, and Metribuzin in a commerce soil”, Environ. Sci. Health (1998). , , 50-78 19. Motoyuki Suzuki, , (2002). 20. Nemeth-Konda, L., Fuleky, Gy., Morovjan, Gy., and Csokan P., “Sorption behaviour of Acetochlor, Atrazine, Carbendazim, Diazinon, Imedacloprid and Isoproturon on Hungaian agri-. ¶êÞ WO ;JÂ$Ò.

(35) ~>Ò

(36) æ~ Æ·BïÒ Ï F8žê ³£~ WO ËKö R \ cultural soil”, Chemosphere, pp. 545-552 (2002). 21. Sanchez-Camazano, M., and Iglesias-Jimenez, E., “City refuse compost and Dodecyl Sulphate as modifiers of Diazinon leachate in soil”, Chemosphere, pp. 3003-3012 (1997). 22. Sharom, M.S., Miles, J.R.W., and McEwen, F.L., “Behaviorof 12 insecticides in soil and aqueous suspension of soil and sediment”, Water Res. 14, pp. 1096-1100 (1980). 23. Singh, G., and Toth, S.J., “Sorption behavior of S-Triazine Thiocarbamate herbicides on soil”, J. Environ. Qual (1990). 24. Stevenson, F.J., Humus chemistry Genesis, Composition,. 103. Reaction, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1994). 25. U.S. EPA Method 3545, Extraction of organophosphorus pesticides using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). 26. Wantanabe, H., and Grismer, M.E., “Diazinon transport through inter-row vegetative filter strips: microecosystem modeling”, Journal of Hydrology, pp. 183-199 (2001). 27. Wauchope, R.D., Simon, Yeh, Jan BHY Linders, Regina Kloskowski, Keiji Tanaka, et al., “Review pesticide soil sorption parameter: Theory, Measurement, Uses, Limitation and Reliability”, Pesticide Management Science (2002).. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95~103, 2004.

(37)

참조

관련 문서

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of these substances on bone regeneration by applying these materials to bone defects after cyst

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of dance leaders' inst ructional behavior patterns on participants' desire to participate and

The major contributions of this study are identifying the influence on the performance of venture business by means of structural equation model and the

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of PAPS essential evaluation factors by applying soccer programs to middle school students participating

Studies on the stabilization mechanism of metal(loid)s in contaminated soil with different calcareous wastes Waste..

In this context, this study compared and analyzed a variety of soil decontamination methods used to evaluate the wide-area soil contaminated with Cs:

Paladent 20 used in this study is heat-polymerized PMMA resin of which physical or clinical properties are excellent. Another favorable property of PMMA resin has been

In this study, a fine Ce 3 Al 11 phase catalyst was synthesized by mechanochemical reaction and the influence of the catalyst on the NaAlH 4 hydrogen storage properties