Prediction of Production Performance Using RTA for Gas Wells in Horn River Shale Gas Field, Canada
전체 글
(2) 808. ۋć · ܁ՁڙϿ. фٰĀۚ(غսؓࣷթÂü, ܳۓսؓࣷթۆؚҙक़, Œ َڦ ں)ت ۆߕݓݓ३ ɰٍ ॢتĵÀ սॱʼČ ەɰ (Mike et al., 2011). ՕێқݓѻԦԓÇࣅąॳܓںԐॢBaihly et al.(2010) ˰قβϸ, սथق܁ԴߣۆşԦԓ͟ڹ۹Ϊࠗؓͳ, ֨ ߸фٰĀѓѪˣۆق˞ۍڅۆ३̤ॢۋÀǣࢍ ǣČқ͆˰قݓɰδÇࣅąॳںǣࢍǸںьशॠٕɰ. Ŕ͠ǣ, Strickland et al.(2011)ڹՕێÀ֟ࠗڹϔڍ ǰ࣊ ڹęʪ ٮʫॢ ֨֟ࢰ Ձ ˺Лڮۋߎ قʴ (Transient flow)ۤۋşÂć՚ʼəںݜǣࢍǴ϶ێ ъÀ֟ڌۺقۻʼəąćݓѕڮʴ(Boundary dominated flow; BDF)قşߣॢԦԓÇࣅčԸқԵͿڷəՕࠗێ ۆԦԓՁ܁ںঝ০ČͲॠşڍͲرдͿ۹ΪࠗՁ őϼڦں३۹ΪࠗϿʝτęRate Transient Analysis(RTA) şѪ ۆԐ܃ ںڌ؋ॠٕɰ. ̚ॢ ՕێÀ֟ۤ ۆş ԦԓşÂ ʴ؋ ߎڮۋʴমę (Pressure transient effect) ˺ЛقԦԓٚ͟ࠑڍͲرۋ ϶ۍۺࣀۻѓѪॣڌۺںąڍȃИ҃սۍۺٚࠑĀ ęεǣࢍǴдͿAnderson et al.(2010)ڹսؓࣷթʽ ՕێÀ֟۹ΪࠗقԴۆԦԓۙΒεқԵॠČধսÀɠ ϔۤ͟ںٚࠑॠə۹ΪࠗϿʝ܃ں؋ॠٕɰ. ۋϿʝ ڹWattenbarger et al.(1998)܃ ۋ؋ॢ Œَ ۋ۹Ϊࠗ ąćقʪɵॢìͿڷÀॢ܁Ըڮʴ(Linear flow) Ͽ ʝ قşߣॠ يɰɳć սؓࣷթ սथ ں܁ϿԐॠٕɰ. ٍ҆ĵقԴəঔνѣҚًݓޅՕێÀ֟ࠗ߸֨قʽ ɰɳćսؓࣷթսथͿڷ܁ҙࢢࠄ˛ʽԦԓۙΒεRTA ՙ॒࣡ڌۺقرڟॠيՕۆࠗێՁںőϼॠČধս ÀɠॢԦԓ͟ںٚࠑॠٕɰ. Wattenbarger शܵčԸę ܼۋŖ֨Â(Square root time; SRT) қԵࣀںॠݓيѕ ڮʴًٖ ںԓॠٕ϶ڷ, Ըڮʴݓ ۋѕڮʴًٖۍ ąقڍFMB қԵͿڷԓʼəCGIPεڌۋॠߕؒي ࣊ęʪεćԓॠٕɰ. ३ԵϿʝںĵՁॠيԦԓۙΒٮ ০֟ࢹνϔࠡşѪࣀںॠيćԓʽؒߕ࣊ęʪεܓۦ ܁ॠČŒَۻʪʪεĵॠٕ϶ڷ, ԦԓÇࣅčԸқԵş Ѫę३ԵϿʝڌۋںॠيٚࠑধսÀɠϔۤ͟(Estimated ultimate recovery;EUR) ںԓॠČۙ ॠٕɰ.. ݗݓॡۺČ ࠪǣɰ ۆҵν࣯֨࠺ͤҼ؉ܳۆҚʴॢ࠘ڦ قޅ ঔνѣқݓəИ֟ࡾ(ٮMuskwa), ١ࢢࣷࡾ(Otter Park), قҼ(Evie) ࠗͿڷĵՁʼ϶(Fig. 1), ՕۆࠗێǫقޅԴ Қ(ࢹ۾ͿڷޅClay)ࠗęʮͿυۋࠗ࣡ۋঊۦʽݜ ۍ҃ںɰ(Fig. 2). ۋқقݓԴҚڹًݓ˃ۆޅՃÒ ۆÀ֟(܁ՕێÀ֟1, 2, 3)˞ڌۋںॠيÀۤԦԓۋ ॢĶݓĵ֨֟ࢰėॡধݓ. Fig. 1. Well location in Horn river, Canada.. Fig. 2. Horn river shale formation. Table 1. Properties of the shale used in model Parameter. Shale gas 1 Shale gas 2 Shale gas 3. Rock type. Shale. Shale. Shale. Formation. . Otter Park. Otter Park. Muskwa. Depth. m. 2,631. 2,607. 2,548. Pay thickness. m. 120. 162. 162. Porosity. %. 3.00. 3.12. 3.12. 78. 76. 76. Gas saturation %. ١͒սॱʼॳ϶ڷؽԦԓäʴٚࠑॣڌۋقսە əÀڌԦԓۙΒÀॄҙॢۋًݓдͿ, ٍ҆ĵقԴə ںًݓۋʂԜॳͿڷԦԓ͟ںқԵॠČۙॠٕɰ. ՕێÀ֟1 ǴۆÀ֟ڹ܁ঔνѣҚقًݓޅԴ۹Ϊ ࠗ˃ƍÀҼİ(ًݓڹئۺ120 m)߸֨قʼ϶ڷؽ, Օ ێÀ֟2ٮ3 À֟ڹ܁ঔνѣҚقًݓޅԴ۹Ϊࠗ˃ ƍÀ Ҽİ˃ ۺƃ(ًݓ ڏ162 m)߸֨ قʼؽɰ. ঔνѣقًݓԴսॱʽսؓࣷթ˰قδÀ֟܁ ԾٖॳқԵĀę˰قβϸ, ࣷթۚࣀںغ३ԦՁʽŒ َࣀںࠗߕۻۋ३ࣷۻʽìͿڷǣࢍǣںࠗߕۻ ۹ΪࠗͿڷԺ܁ॠٕɰ. ֨߸սॱʽêࠗۚقغԴ ࠑ܁ʽՕۆࠗێНՁÉ˞ںTable 1قǣࢍǴؽɰ. À ֟܁ՕێÀ֟1ę2ə١ࢢࣷࡾԜҙࠗق, ՕێÀ֟3 ڹИ֟ࡾٮॠҙࠗ߸֨قʼ϶ڷؽÁÀ֮֟ۆ܁ʪ.
(3) 809. ࠪǣɰ ঔνѣ ՕێÀ֟ۻǴ À֟ ۆ܁RTA қԵ ॢࣀ ںÀ֟ ܁ԦԓՁ ٚࠑ. əÁÁ2631 m, 2607 m, 2548 mۋɰ. ۆࠗݓėŕέ ڹ3% ǴͿٽՕێÀ֟1߸֨ۋʽۆࠗݓėŕέۋɰ δ˃ۆًݓėŕέ҃ɰɰՙǰڹìͿڷǣࢍǮɰ. Օ ێÀ֟1 ۆًݓÀ֟पজʪÀ78%ͿՕێÀ֟2ٮ3 ۆࠗݓۆÀ֟पজʪ҃ɰɰՙȭڹìͿڷǣࢍǮɰ.. ঔνѣՕێÀ֟ۆۻԦԓۙΒқԵĀę ێъ Ϳڷۺ۹ΪࠗقԴ ьԦॠə ѓԐڮʴ(Radial flow; Fig. 3(a))ęɵνՕێÀ֟قۻԴəŒَۋьԦ ʽĵÂǴقԴॢۿۍŒَԐۆۋÂԾۍͿڷ३Œَ ۋьԦॢĵÂǴقԴχԦԓۋۋΘݓرş˺ЛقҼ Œَ ؒߕͿҙࢢ ьԦॠə Ըڮʴ(Fig. 3(b))څܳ ۋ Ԧԓڮʴϭ࠶ɦۋݏɰ. ٍ҆ĵقԴəڮॢ͠ۋʴইԜ ںČͲॠşڦॠࣷيթŒَߕؒۋǴ࠘ڦقॠəսथ ܁Ͽʝ(Table 1 and 2)ॢڌۋںRTAşѪںটڌॠٕ ɰ. RTAşѪ࠘ڹнԐؒфՕێÀ֟۹ΪࠗۆԦԓۙ ΒқԵقȇνԐڌʼəşѪͿڷ۹࣊ęʪ۹ΪࠗقԴ ࣷթŒَۋԦԓںॳٖقй࠘əą֨ڍÂ˰قδÀ֟ ҙ ں͟ܕٚࠑॠə ą ڍԐڌʼə ܳ څϿʝۋɰ (Strickland et al., 2011). ٍ҆ĵقԴəRTAşѪۺں ॢڌՙ॒࣡ ܼ رڟÀۤ ȇν Ԑڌʼə FeketeԐۆ ‘RTA’ ՙ॒࣡رڟεটڌॠيঔνѣՕێÀ֟ڮۆۻ ʴՁęࠗݓՁںőϼॠČԦԓۙΒεşߣͿॳ Ԧԓ͟ںٚࠑॠČۙॠٕɰ. ٍ҆ĵقԴঔνѣՕێ À֟ۆۻԦԓۙΒεқԵॠşڦॠॢڌۺيşѪ˞ę Ŕ ę ں˞܁Fig. 4 قǣࢍǴؽɰ.. À֟ۆۻԦԓٚ͟ࠑڦں३Դə٤цδқԵʪĵۆ Ը܁ęԦԓۙΒεşߣͿॢࠗݓНՁۆőϼˣۋϔ څܼڍॠ϶, ۋεڦ३Ԧԓ֨ݓۆߕڮࠗݓѕڮʴٖ ًқԵۋԸॱʼॢآرɰ. ÁÀ֟ق܁Դݓۆѕڮʴ ًٖںőϼॠşڦॠيWattenbarger शܵčԸęܼۋ Ŗ֨ қԵ(Square root time; SRT)ڌۋ ںॠٕɰ. ÁՕۆ˞ࠗێՁںԓॠşڦॠيSRT қԵ, ڮ ʴНݗս(ݓFlowing Material Balance; FMB) қԵę३ ԵϿʝॢڌۋں০֟ࢹνϔࠡ(History matching)ۋں ڌॠٕɰ. ؒߕ࣊ۆęʪεқԵॠşڦॠيSRT Ŕ͒ ॒قԴݔԸۆşڐşͿǣࢍǣəԸڮʴѺս(Linear Flow Parameter;LFP)εćԓॠٕəʚؒߕ࣊ęʪٮŒ َۙŕϸۆۺĕͿڷǣࢍǣəLFPقԴؒߕ࣊ęʪε ćԓॠşڦ३ԴəFMB қԵڌۋںॠيOGIPεԓ ॠॢآيɰ. ॠݓχFMB қԵڹBDFÀݓѕڮʴًٖ ۍÀ֟ق܁ԴχԐڌÀɠॠдͿ, ٍ҆ĵقԴəԸڮ ʴۋǣࢍǣəÀ֟ق܁ԴFMB қԵڌۋںॠߤۿي À֟ҙ(͟ܕContacted Gas In Place; CGIP)ںԓॠي ইۦԜقԴ࣊ߕؒۆęʪٮŒَъţۋεćԓॠٕ ɰ. ۋԜقԴĵॢՕۆࠗێՁ˞ڌۋںॠيÁÁۆ À֟ق܁ʂॢɰɳćսؓࣷթսथ܁३ԵϿʝںĵՁ ॢˏ֬܃ԦԓۙΒεϔࠡ॥׆ͿڷИڙŒَۻʪʪ (Dimensionless Fracture Conductivity; FcD)εćԓॠČ,. (a) (b) Fig. 3. Dominant flow regimes for (a) conventional reservoir (radial flow) and (b) unconventional reservoir (linear flow) (Fekete Associates Inc.).. Fig. 4. Overall workflow.. Table 2. Well information drilled and completed Well Length (m). Depth (m). Horizontal Length (m). Fracturing Stage. Fracturing Spacing (m). Shale gas 1. 5006. 2631. 2200. 20. 110. Shale gas 2. 5227. 2607. 2200. 20. 110. Shale gas 3. 5202. 2548. 2640. 24. 110. ܃49ń ܃6.
(4) 810. ۋć · ܁ՁڙϿ. ॳ Ԧԓ͟ ٚࠑ قটڌॠٕɰ. υݓφͿڷ, ԓʽՕۆࠗێՁ˞ęԦԓۙΒεۋ ڌॠيÇࣅčԸę३ԵϿʝқԵںսॱॠيঔνѣՕ ۆࠗێEUR ںԓॠٕɰ. ݓѕڮʴًٖőϼ Wattenbarger शܵčԸقԴəݓѕڮʴًٖۋԸڮ ʴۋϸ0.5ۆşڐşεÀݓČBDFۋϸ1ۆşڐşও ݓڹսÇթ(exponential decline)Ϳǣࢍǣóʼ϶, ۋε ࣀ३ ݓѕڮʴًٖ ںĵқॣ ս ەɰ(Wattenbarger et al., 1998). ॠݓχ, Wattenbarger शܵčԸݓॢڌۋں ѕڮʴًٖқԵ֨À֟(ࢇ֟ق܁skin)ەۋəąۋڍ ۆق३À֟ۆԦԓäʴۋBDFͿǣࢍǨսڷەдͿ (Nobakht and Mattar, 2012) ٍ҆ĵقԴəSRT қԵę ঔڌॠݓيѕڮʴًٖںқԵॠٕɰ. ԦԓۙΒεSRT Ŕ॒͒Ϳ ǣࢍǴ ˺ ںؽԸڮʴݔ ڹԸͿڷ, BDFə ࠚڍ࠘ ͿڷޅڦčԸ Ϳڷǣࢍǣó ʽɰ(Anderson, 2010). ՕێÀ֟ۆ܁ԦԓՁٚࠑؘقԴÁÀ֟قۻԴ ۹ΪࠗͿڷҙࢢԦԓۆͿڷ܁À֟ڮʴًٖںőϼॠٕ ɰ. Áݓѕڮʴًٖںʪॠşڦ३Wattenbarger श ܵčԸęSRT қԵࣀں३ÁÀ֟قۻԴॳٖۆъą ۋ۹Ϊࠗ ۆąć قʪɵॠٕəࣺ ݓɳॠČۙ ॠٕɰ. ̚ॢSRT Ŕ॒͒ԜقԴÀ֟ܓٖڏۆ܁æѺজͿۍ ॠيқԓʽۙΒÀǣࢍǦĵÂەۋş˺Лۋقε߯ ՙজॠşڦ३Super-position time şѪڌۋںॠيқ Ե قČॠٕɰ. ՕێÀ֟1ۆWattenbarger शܵčԸқԵĀę(Fig. 5) ε҃ϸ, ԦԓۙΒۆşڐşÀۆࠑڍBDF şڐşقʪ ɵॠݓЇॠٕڷдͿ؉ݔԸڮʴًٖ؎ںڼەقս ەɰ. ̚ॢFig. 6ۆSRT Ŕ॒͒قԴ҇սەˢۋۋ À֟ܓٖڏۆ܁æѺজͿۍॠۙيΒÀқԓʼڷەر ǣͿڷۺߕۻə̤ॠóݔԸںǣࢍǴČڷەдͿ؉. Fig. 5. Wattenbarger type curve in shale gas 1.. ॢĶݓĵ֨֟ࢰėॡধݓ. ݔԸڮʴًٖەقəìࣺͿڷɳʽɰ. ՕێÀ֟2ٮ 3 À֟ۆ܁ąڍ, Wattenbarger शܵčԸқԵĀęε҃ ϸ˃ÒۆÀ֟܁Ͽ˃࠶ҵۆşڐşÀۆࠑڍBDF ş ڐşقʪɵॠݓЇॠٕڷдͿڮߕڮʴۋԸڮʴٖ ًەقəì؎ںսەɰ(Fig. 7 and 9). ̚ॢ, Fig. 8 and 10ۆSRT Ŕ॒͒قԴʪ˃À֟܁Ͽ˃̤ॠó. Fig. 6. Square root time in shale gas 1.. Fig. 7. Wattenbarger type curve in shale gas 2.. Fig. 8. Square root time plot in shale gas 2..
(5) ࠪǣɰ ঔνѣ ՕێÀ֟ۻǴ À֟ ۆ܁RTA қԵ ॢࣀ ںÀ֟ ܁ԦԓՁ ٚࠑ. ֩(2)قԴxəսथۆ܁ţۋ, xfəŒَъţۋ, Lڹ ࣷթŒَۆÂü(fracture spacing), yəŒَۙŕʽ۹Ϊ ࠗۆफ(stimulated reservoir width), hə۹Ϊࠗ˃ۆƍ (reservoir thickness), ASRVəŒَॳٖۆϸ(ۺArea of Stimulated Reservoir Volume) ۋɰ. LFPə ؒߕ࣊ęʪ ٮAc ۆĕ Ϳڷćԓʼş ˺Лق şۆܕѓѪͿڷÁÁۆÉںćԓॠəìڹBDFÀǣ ࢍǣəąڍFMB ࠶ҵεࣀॠآيχÀɠॠɰ. ॠݓχ ٍ҆ĵقԴԸॢ܁ՕێÀ֟ق܁ԴəԸڮʴݓۋѕ ڮʴًٖ Ϳڷǣࢍǣş ˺Л قNobakht and Clarkson (2011)܃ۋ؋ॢCGIPεڌۋॠٕɰ. CGIP͈۹Ϊࠗۋ ߎڮۋʴওڹԸڮʴԜॳٖ˺ێъąǴقҙܕ ॠə À֟֨ڙϔۤ͟ۆ ںйॢɰ. ҆ ٍĵقԴə SRT Ŕ॒͒قԴۆυݓφप࣡ۍεBDF ֨ۚͿڷ۾À܁ॠ ČۋεڌۋॠيFMB ࠶ҵεٽԙॠيCGIPεćԓॠ ٕɰ. يşԴڹصCGIPεڌۋ, ֩(3)ࣀںॠيইۦԜ قԴۆASRVÉںćԓॣսەɰ. ćԓʽASRVεڌۋ ॠ( ֩ ي1)ę (2)ε ࣀ३ ؒߕ࣊ęʪε ĵॣ ս ەɰ.. Fig. 9. Wattenbarger type curve in shale gas 3.. ¢© Z ƅƇ ¬«¯ á ć ŋƆ¬ƅ. Fig. 10. Square root time plot in shale gas 3.. ݔԸںǣࢍǴČەş˺ЛڮߕڮقʴڹԸڮʴًٖ ەقəìࣺͿڷɳॠٕɰ. ՃÀ֟ڮۆ܁ʴՁںő ϼॢĀę, ՃÀ֟܁Ͽ˃قԴԸڮʴݓۋѕڮۍۺ ʴ ःࢤ Ϳڷǣࢍǣə ì ͿڷқԵʼؽɰ. ՕۆࠗێՁԓ 3Ò À֟ ܁Ͽ˃قԴ Ըڮʴݓ ۋѕڮʴًٖͿڷ ǣࢍǣəìͿڷқԵʼڷؽдͿ, SRT Ŕ॒͒εڌۋॠ يLFPεćԓॠČՕێÀ֟Ԧԓٚ͟ࠑϿʝڌۺق ॠČۙॠٕɰ. LFPə֩(1)ęÏۋǣࢍǣ϶शܵজ ؓͳ(Normalized pressure)ę SRT Ŕ॒͒قԴ ݔԸۆ şڐşε ࣀ३ ćԓॣ ս ەɰ. ¥© á Ɓöć ƉƋ. 811. (3). ҆ ٍĵقԴə FMB ٮSRT қԵࣀ ںॠ يASRVٮ LFPεćԓॠٕČ, ۋεڌۋॠيथŒؒߕ࣊ęʪٮŒ َъţۋεԓॠٕɰ. ۙۋΒ˞ںটڌॠي३ԵϿʝ ںĵՁॠČ֬܃ԦԓۙΒεॢڌۋ০֟ࢹνϔࠡş Ѫࣀںॠ࣊ߕؒيęʪε܁ܓۦॠٕ϶ڷŒَۻʪʪ ε ćԓॠٕɰ. ÁÀ֟ۆ܁SRT қԵĀę, LFPəÁÁ1.27, 1.96, 4 1/2 2 2.31×10 md m ͿՕێÀ֟1ۆLFPÀÀۤǰČ, Օ ێÀ֟3ۆLFPÀÀۤȭóǣࢍǮɰ(Fig. 7, 9 and 11). ԦԓۙΒε Normalized Rate ٮNormalized Cum.. (1). ֩(1)قԴkm࣊ۆߕؒڹęʪ϶ۋ, AcəŒَؒۋ ߕߤۿٮॠəߪϸͿڷۺɰɳćսؓࣷթսथۆ܁ą قڍə֩(2)ٮÏۋćԓʽɰ(Anderson et al., 2010). Ɓ á. . Ɩ. ¬«¯ Ɔ āƗƆ á 㥠ÞÏƖ ß Ɔ á ć ¥ Ƅ Ɨ. (2). Fig. 11. Flowing material balance curve of shale 1.. ܃49ń ܃6.
(6) 812. ۋć · ܁ՁڙϿ. ProductionͿ ʪ֨ॢ FMB ࠶ҵقԴ ۙΒε ݔԸͿڷ ٽԙॠيCGIPεԓॠٕČ֩(1)ę(2)εڌۋॠي थŒؒߕ࣊ęʪεćԓॠٕ϶ڷ, ՕێÀ֟1ۆĀęε ʪ֨ॠٕɰ(Fig. 12). ՕێÀ֟1, 2, 3࣊ߕؒۆęʪə -4 ÁÁ2.68, 5.47, 5.89×10 mdͿՕێÀ֟1࣊ۆęʪÀ ÀۤǰČՕێÀ֟3࣊ۆęʪÀÀۤȭڹìͿڷǣ ࢍǮČ(Table 3), ŒَъţۋəÁÁ81, 64, 61 mͿć ԓʼرՕێÀ֟1ࣷقթʽŒَۆţۋÀÀۤšì ͿڷǣࢍǮɰ. ३ԵϿʝقԴə ԜşقԴ ԓʽ ؒߕ࣊ęʪ ٮŒَ. ъţۋεॢڌۺɰɳćսؓࣷթսथ҄܁०Ͽʝ(Fig. 12)ę֬܃Ԧԓ͟ڮ, ؓͳۙΒε০֟ࢹνϔࠡ॥Ϳڷ ׆ÁԦԓق܁ԴۆИڙŒَۻʪʪεćԓॠٕڷ ϶, ՕێÀ֟1ۆĀęεʪ֨ॠٕɰ(Fig. 13). ՕێÀ֟ 1قԴ74ۆИڙŒَۻʪʪÀԓʼؽČ, ՕێÀ֟ 2ٮ3قԴə28, 34ۆИڙŒَۻʪʪÀԓʼؽɰ (Table 3). Ԧԓٚ͟ࠑ ঔνѣ Օ ێÀ֟قۻԴ ۆEUR ںԓॠş ڦॠي, ԦԓÇࣅčԸқԵę३ԵϿʝқԵںսॱॠٕɰ. ३Ե ϿʝڹÀ֟ۍۙ˥܁, ۹ΪࠗՁ, Œَъţߕؒٮۋ ࣊ęʪ, ИڙŒَۻʪʪεڌۋॠيĵՁॠٕۋ϶ڷ ε֬܃ԦԓۙΒٮϔࠡ॥ͿڷԴॳԦԓ͟ںٚࠑॠ ٕɰ. ̚ॢ, ३ԵϿʝقԴʪʽÉęҼİॠşڦॠي ԦԓÇࣅčԸڌۋںॠيԦԓ͟ںٚࠑॠٕ϶ڷԦԓ ÇࣅčԸқԵقԴəই۾֨ۦݓѕڮʴًٖںąć ݓѕڮʴͿڷČͲॠيHyperbolic ÇࣅčԸࣀں३Ԧ ԓ͟ ںٚࠑॠٕɰ. Ϥ۹, ԦԓÇࣅčԸۆق३ٚࠑॢԦԓ͟қԵĀę 6 3 ε҃ϸ, ՕێÀ֟1 À֟ق܁Դə171×10 m (Fig. 14), ՕێÀ֟2ٮ3 À֟ق܁ԴəÁÁ202, 238×106m3ۆ À֟ÀধսÀɠॢìࣺͿڷɳʽɰ(Table 4). ३ԵϿ. Fig. 12. Wellbore schematic of shale gas 1. Table 3. Calculated properties from square root time curve and analytical model analysis . xf (m). LFP 1/2 2 (md m ). km (md). FcD. Shale gas 1. 81. 1.27E+04. 2.68E-04. 74. Shale gas 2. 64. 1.96E+04. 5.47E-04. 28. Shale gas 3. 61. 2.31E+04. 5.89E-04. 34. Fig. 14. Production forecast using decline curve in shale gas 1. Table 4. Production forecast using DCA and analytical model. Fig. 13. Rate and pressure history match in shale gas 1.. ॢĶݓĵ֨֟ࢰėॡধݓ. EURDCA 6 3 (10 m ). EURAnalytical model 6 3 (10 m ). Shale gas 1. 171. 258. Shale gas 2. 202. 289. Shale gas 3. 238. 324.
(7) ࠪǣɰ ঔνѣ ՕێÀ֟ۻǴ À֟ ۆ܁RTA қԵ ॢࣀ ںÀ֟ ܁ԦԓՁ ٚࠑ. Fig. 15. Production forecast using analytical model in shale gas 1.. ʝॢڌۋںқԵقԴəՕێÀ֟1 À֟ق܁Դ258×106 m3(Fig. 15), ՕێÀ֟2ٮ3قԴۆEURڹ289×106 m3, 6 3 324×10 m Ϳԓʼؽɰ. ۋԜقԴԓʽĀęε҃ ϸ, ԦԓÇࣅčԸқԵę३ԵϿʝقԴԓʽÁÀ֟ ۆ܁EURÉۋқԵѓѪѻͿۋε҃ݓۋχ, ʴێқ ԵѓѪͿڷԓʽEURÉڹՕۆࠗێՁܼقԴؒ ߕ࣊ęʪٮŒَъţںॳٖࢀقۋыəì؎ںսە ɰ(Table 3). ̚ॢ३ԵϿʝڌۋںॠيԓʽEURÉ ۋʌȭڹÉںǣࢍǻəʚ, ՃÀ֟܁Ͽ˃ٖॳъąۋ ۹Ϊࠗąćقʪɵॠ؍ݓ؉Ըڮʴݓۋѕڮʴًٖ ۍԜۋдͿԦԓÇࣅčԸқԵşѪقԴԓʽĀę ҃ɰ३ԵϿʝقԴۆٚࠑÉۋʌ܁ঝॣìࣺͿڷɳ ʽɰ.. Ā ٍ҆ĵقԴəঔνѣ қۆݓҚقًݓ ޅԴࠄ˛ʽ սथ܁ԦԓۙΒεڌۋॠݓيѕڮʴًٖęՕۆࠗێ ՁںԓॠČÇࣅčԸę३ԵϿʝڌۋںॠيধս ÀɠԦԓ͟ںٚࠑॠٕ϶ڷ, ɰڼęÏڹĀęεʪ ॠٕɰ. 1. ঔνѣՕ߸֨قࠗێʽՃÒۆÀ֟ق܁Դڮۆ ͟ęؓͳۙΒεWattenbarger शܵčԸęSRT Ŕ ॒͒εڌۋॠيқԵॢĀę, ՕێÀ֟1, 2, 3 Ͽ ˃ڮߕڮʴۋ۹Ϊࠗąćقʪɵॠڹ؍ݓԸ ڮʴ ںǣࢍǴČ ەə ì ͿڷқԵʼؽɰ. 2. ՃÒۆÀ֟܁Ͽ˃قԴԸڮʴݓۋѕڮʴًٖ Ϳڷǣࢍǣəì ͿڷқԵʼڷؽдͿ, SRT қԵ ࣀںॠيLFPεԓॠČFMB қԵڌۋںॠي CGIPεćԓॠٕɰ. ćԓʽÉ˞ڌۋںॠي३Ե. 813. Ͽʝॢڌۋں০֟ࢹνϔࠡࣀں३ؒߕ࣊ęʪε ܁ܓॠČИڙŒَۻʪʪεćԓॠيՕێÀ֟ Ԧԓٚ͟ࠑقটڌॠٕɰ. ŔĀęՕێÀ֟1, 2, -4 3࣊ߕؒۆęʪəÁÁ2.68, 5.47, 5.89×10 mdͿ ǣࢍǮ϶ڷ, 74, 28, 34ۆИڙŒَۻʪʪÀԓ ʼؽɰ. 3. ঔνѣՕ ێÀ֟قۻԴۆEURںԓॠşڦॠ ي, ԜşقԴ ԓʽ ؒߕ࣊ęʪ ٮŒَۻʪʪε টڌॠيԦԓÇࣅčԸқԵę३ԵϿʝқԵںս 6 3 ॱॢĀę, ÁÁۆѓѪقʂ३171~238×10 m ę 6 3 258~324×10 m ۆEURۋԓʼؽɰ. ३ԵϿʝں ڌۋॠيԓʽEURÉۋʌȭڹÉںǣࢍǻə ʚ, 3Ò܁Ͽ˃ٖॳъąۋ۹Ϊࠗąćقʪɵॠ ؍ݓ؉ԸڮʴݓۋѕڮʴًٖۍԜۋдͿԦ ԓÇࣅčԸқԵşѪقԴԓʽĀę҃ɰ३ԵϿ ʝقԴ ۆٚࠑ É ۋʌ ܁ঝॣ ìࣺ Ϳڷɳʽɰ. 4. ՃÒۆÀ֟ق܁ʂ३ԓʽEURÉںқԵॢĀ ę, ՃÒۆÀ֟ق܁ԴۆEURڹLFPÀÀۤࢀ ՕێÀ֟ 3قԴ ȭó ǣࢍǮČ, LFPÀ Àۤ ǰڹ É ںÀݓə ՕێÀ֟ 1قԴ ۚó ǣࢍǮɰ.. ČЛॶ Anderson, D.M., Nobakht, M., Moghadam, S. and Mattar, L., 2010. “Analysis of production data from fractured shale gas well,” SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, Feb. 23-25, pp 1-6, SPE 131787. Baihly, J.D., Altman, R.M., Malpani, R. and Luo, F., 2010, “Shale gas production decline trend comparison over time and basins,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, Sep. 19-22, pp. 1-24, SPE 135555. Fekete Associates Inc, 2012. 8. 16, www.fekete.com. Mike G., Smith, K. and Thorn, D., 2011, “Encana corporation 2011 Key resource play conference call series - Horn river,” Encana, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Oct. 4. Moon, S.H. and Sung, W.M., 2012, “The optimal design to recover NGL from the wet gas reservoir at Chinkeh formation of Maxhamish Field, Canada,” The Korean Society for Geosystem Engineering, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 129-137. Nobakht, M. and Clarkson, C. R., 2011, “Estimation of Contacted and Original Gas-in-Place for Low Permeability Reservoirs Exhibiting Linear Flow,” Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Alberta, Canada, Nov. 15-17, SPE 149398. Nobakht, M. and Mattar, L., 2012, “Analyzing Production. ܃49ń ܃6.
(8) 814. ۋć · ܁ՁڙϿ. Data From Unconventional Gas Reservoirs With Linear Flow and Apparent Skin,” Jounal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 52-59. Strickland, R.F., Purvis, D.C. and Blasingame, T.A., 2011, “Practical aspects of reserve determination for shale gas,” SPE North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Woodlands, Texas, USA, Jun. 12-16, pp 10-15, SPE 144357. Wang, J., Jung, W. and Ghassemi, A., 2012, “Deformation. and Failure Properties of Newberry Welded Tuff,” ARMA 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, USA, Jun. 24-27, ARMA 2012-415. Wattenbarger, R.A., El-Banbi, A.H., Villegas, M.E. and Maggard, J.B., 1998, “Production analysis of linear flow into fractured tight gas well,” SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoir Symposium and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, Apr. 5-8, SPE 39931.. ଲծ୨. নࡦ. ইتॢۦʂॡİۙڙঞąėॡęчԐę܁, ॢĶÀ֟ėԐࠪǣɰ Ѫۤ ۍ (欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧49嘳G 缧3埲G 垾畢). ইتॢ ۦʂॡİ ۙڙঞąėॡę İս (欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧49嘳G 缧5埲G 垾畢). ॢĶݓĵ֨֟ࢰėॡধݓ.
(9)
관련 문서
Others: waste heat in distillation tower, waste heat recovery, natural gas pressure turbine, by-product gas Source: The monthly report on major electric power statistics,
Meanwhile, the Shale Gas energy revolution by the US is raising the competition for securing stable energy in Northeast Asian countries, and it is time
Major improvements on the contract are offered. First, a broader menu of gas supply services is called for including interruptible and priority services. In
In this study, the mercury in exhaust gas was measured from three large coal-fired power plants in Korea using the continuous emission monitoring system
For this reason, in this study, comparing the traditional manufacturing process and relatively high temperature of exhaust gas heat and CO2 laser
~ a model in which the entire resistance to diffusion from the liquid surface to the main gas stream is assumed to occur in a stagnant or laminar film of constant thickness
– Given an equilibrated gas-liquid system containing only a single condensable component A, a correlation for , and any two of the variables y A (mole fraction of A in
Shale Gas