• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

• Young’s Double Slit Experiment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "• Young’s Double Slit Experiment"

Copied!
24
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

This Lecture

• Two-Beam Interference

• Young’s Double Slit Experiment

• Virtual Sources

• Newton’s Rings

• Film Thickness Measurement by Interference Last Lecture

• Wave equations

• Maxwell equations and EM waves

• Superposition of waves

Chapter 10. Interference of Light

Chapter 10. Interference of Light

(2)

Two-Beam Interference Two-Beam Interference

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

1 2

1 01 1 1

2 02 2 2

:

, cos

, cos

Consider two waves E and E that have the same frequency

E r t E k r t

E r t E k r t

ω ω ε

ω ε

= ⋅ − +

= ⋅ − +

r r

r r r r r

r r r r r

(polarization direction)

Hecht, Optics, Chapter 9.

(3)

Two-Beam Interference Two-Beam Interference

Interference term

(4)

Two-Beam Interference Two-Beam Interference

The interference term is given by

The irradiances for beams 1 and 2 are given by :

x

(5)

Two-Beam Interference Two-Beam Interference

The time averages are given by

The interference term is given by

: phase difference

(6)

Two-Beam Interference Two-Beam Interference

The total irradiance is given by

There is a maximum in the interference pattern when

This is referred to as constructive interference.

There is a minimum in the interference pattern when

This is referred to as destructive interference When

(7)

Visibility Visibility

Visibility = fringe contrast

{ 0 1 }

min max

min

max

≤ ≤

+

≡ − V

I I

I V I

When

Therefore, V = 1

(8)

Conditions for good visibility Conditions for good visibility

Sources must be:

same in phase evolution

in terms of

time (source frequency) Æ temporal coherence space (source size) Æ spatial coherence

Same in amplitude Same in polarization

Very good Normal

Very bad

(9)

Young’s Double Slit Experiment Young’s Double Slit Experiment

Hecht, Optics, Chapter 9.

(10)

Assume that y << s and a << s.

The condition for an interference maximum is

The condition for an interference minimum is Relation between

geometric path difference and phase difference :

a

s

y

Δ

θ

Young’s Double Slit Interference

Young’s Double Slit Interference

(11)

On the screen the irradiance pattern is given by

Assuming that y << s :

Bright fringes:

Dark fringes:

Young’s Double Slit Interference

Young’s Double Slit Interference

(12)

Interference Fringes From 2 Point Sources

Interference Fringes From 2 Point Sources

(13)

Interference Fringes From 2 Point Sources Interference Fringes From 2 Point Sources

Two coherent point sources : P1 and P2

(14)

Interference With Virtual Sources:

Fresnel’s Double Mirror

Interference With Virtual Sources:

Fresnel’s Double Mirror

Hecht, Optics, Chapter 9.

(15)

Interference With Virtual Sources:

Lloyd’s Mirror

Interference With Virtual Sources:

Lloyd’s Mirror

mirror

Rotation stage Light

source

(16)

Interference With Virtual Sources:

Fresnel’s Biprism

Interference With Virtual Sources:

Fresnel’s Biprism

Hecht, Optics, Chapter 9.

(17)

Interference in Dielectric Films

Interference in Dielectric Films

(18)

Analysis of Interference in Dielectric Films

Analysis of Interference in Dielectric Films

(19)

Analysis of Interference in Dielectric Films Analysis of Interference in Dielectric Films

The phase difference due to optical path length differences for the front and back reflections is given by

(20)

Analysis of Interference in Dielectric Films Analysis of Interference in Dielectric Films

Also need to account for phase differences Δr due to differences in the reflection process at the front and back surfaces

Constructive interference

Destructive interference

(21)

Fringes of Equal Inclination Fringes of Equal Inclination

Fringes arise as Δ varies due to changes

in the incident angle:

Constructive interference

Destructive interference

(22)

Fringes of Equal Thickness Fringes of Equal Thickness

When the direction of the incoming light is fixed, fringes arise as Δ varies due to changes

in the dielectric film thickness :

Constructive interference

Destructive interference

(23)

Fringes of Equal Thickness: Newton’s Rings

Fringes of Equal Thickness: Newton’s Rings

(24)

Fringes of Equal Thickness: Newton’s Rings

Fringes of Equal Thickness: Newton’s Rings

참조

관련 문서

Second, the result of difference analysis of character education according to training term of elementary school students is that in export facto

Changes in functional physical fitness, after the experiment compared to before the experiment in the group of exercise, showed a significant difference in

Thirdly, it appeared that social support had meaningful effect on self-efficacy and the quality of life, and in the case of the difference analysis by

Second, the analysis of differences by affiliation showed that the controlled coaching actions were perceived higher in order of the general, secondary, and

The analysis results of differences in tenacity according to the career of winning a prize indicate some differences in desire for victory, fighting spirit,

This study was to do a comparative analysis on kinematic differences and differences in muscle activity between the skilled and the unskilled in windsurfing

Step 2 The subsidiary equation is solved by purely algebraic manipulations3. Step 3 The solution in Step 2 is transformed back, resulting in the solution of

First, the frequently occurred Interference Effects was the 'stroop Interference Effects' in the Information Design ; second, the factors of Interference