Ä
Z ØP ] k ù ] k ù° Ë Ñ= k ºõ u § T Ó Þ X ¢ LED ç g Ë m ºã _ Ë8 ý ° Ë Ñ] K ¡ ¤V R Ë; c 6 X ¢ S
ö o Ú7 _T Ó Å ì Å
T
( å £ · z < g ` @
ô
Ça Ë >@ / < Æ § Ó ü t o < Æõ , ð r ; 200-702
(2011¸ 11 Z 4 9{ 9 ~ Ã Î6 £ §, 2012¸ 1 Z 4 5{ 9 Ã º& ñ : r ~ Ã Î6 £ §, 2012¸ 1 Z 4 9{ 9 > F S X & ñ )
F
g Æ Ò& h r Ó ý t Y Us \ l ì ø ÍK " f ' õ AÒ o ¦^ µ 1 Ï F g s ¸× ¼(LED)ü < + þ AF g ^ 8 £ x s ì r o ) a ½ ¨ ¸_ LED
¸" î _ : £ ¤$ í ` ¦ Ñ þ Ò o LED ¸" î _ Õ ª כ õ q § % i . ì r o + þ A + þ AF g ^ ½ ¨ ¸ & h 6 x ) a ô Ç t 7 á x À Ó_ f
+ þ A ¸" î x 9 ¿ º t 7 á x À Ó_ " Ó t + þ A ¨ î ó ø Í ¸" î É r ¸¿ º Ñ þ Ò oLED ¸" î \ q K Z } É r l ½ ¨´ òÖ ¦ õ ¸
"
î ´ òÖ ¦` ¦ ? /% 3 . s H LED } 9 õ + þ AF g ^ 8 £ x s / B N ç ß & h Ü ¼ Ð ì r o H d Ü ¼ Ð+ + þ AF g ^ \ " f Û ¼ Ðß ¼Û ¼
s \ _ K ~ ½ ÓØ ¦ ) a © © _ y n Cs LED } 9 \ _ K F f ¨ Ã º | ¨ c S X Ò ¦ s × ¦ # Q[ þ t% 3 l M :ë H s . LED ¸
"
î Ü ¼ ÐÂ Ò' 1 m b # Q4 R e H ¸ F g \ " f_ Ò oý a³ ð ¼ # H ì r o + þ A + þ AF g ^ & h 6 x ) a f + þ A ¸" î ` ¦ ] j ü
@ ¸¿ º 0.01 & ñ ¸\ Ô ¦ õ # Ä ºÃ ºô Ç Ò o ¸ç H{ 9 $ í ` ¦ Ð# Å Ò% 3 . : r ½ ¨\ " f H ¢ ¸ô Ç + þ AF g ^ r Ó
ý
t Y Us _ ø @$ í ` ¦ ¾ Ó © r v l 0 AK 8 £ ¤& ñ ) a µ 1 Ï F g Û ¼& 7 à Ô! 3 \ l ì ø ÍK " f + þ AF g ^ _ f ¨ Ã º x 9 # l Û ¼
&
7 à Ô! 3 ` ¦ ½ ¨ H ~ ½ ÓZ O ` ¦ ] jr % i .
Ù þ
d # Q: ¦^ µ 1 Ï F g s ¸× ¼, LED, ¸" î , + þ AF g ^ , r Ó ý t Y Us
Simulation Study on the Optical Performances of LED Flat Illumination Devices Based on Remote Phosphor Designs
Byung-Woo Lee · Jae-Hyeon Ko ∗
Department of Physics, Hallym University, Chuncheon 200-702
(Received 9 November 2011 : revised 5 January 2012 : accepted 9 January 2012)
Systematic comparisons between PC(phosphor-coated)-LED-based and RP(remote-phosphor)- LED-based illumination devices have been carried out by using optical simulations based on the Monte-Carlo ray-tracing technique. In order to simulate the phosphor particles reliably, we de- termined the absorption and the excitation spectra of phosphors based on the measured emission spectrum and analysis. The device efficiencies of the RP-LED-based devices were higher than those of the PC-LED-based devices by 4 ∼ 10 %. The illumination efficiencies of the RP-LED-based de- vices were higher than those of the PC-LED-based devices by 8 ∼ 11.6 %. These results contributed to the higher illuminances on the illuminated surfaces at a distance of 1 m from the devices. The origin of these higher efficiencies of the RP-LBE-based devices was attributed to the reduced prob- ability of the absorption in the RP-LED-based illumination devices of the light generated by LED.
The differences in the color coordinates between the center and other locations on the illuminated surface were found to be less than 0.01 except for the directly-lit RP-LED-based device, which exhibited a color difference of about 0.04. The color mixing occurred in only the phosphor layer
-47-
in the directly-lit RP-LED-based device while for other LED devices, it occurred not only in the phosphor layer but also in the alabaster glass plate, resulting in better color uniformity.
PACS numbers: 42.15.Eq, 42.79.Kr
Keywords: Light emitting diode, LED, Illumination, Phosphor, Simulation
I. " e  ] Ø
þ
j H [ j> & h \ -t 0 Al ü < $ èq § 4 + þ A l Õ ü t \
@
/ô Ç Å Ò3 l q \ j Ë µ{ 9 # Q ¦^ µ 1 Ï F g s ¸× ¼ (Light Emitting Diode, LED) \ l ì ø Íô Ç ¸" î l Õ ü t s  Òy ÷ & ¦ e [1–
3]. LED ¸" î É r l > r _ \ P 6 £ §F G + þ AF g1 p x õ H Ø Ô> Ã º É r 1
p
x _ Ä »K Ó ü t| 9 s í < Ê÷ &# Q e t · ú § ¨ 8 â 2 ; o& h ¸" î l
Õ ü t Ð y F g ~ à Π¦ e Ü ¼ 9 [ j> & h ½ ¨ü < È Ò s À
Ò# Qt ¦ e ¦ þ j H \ H Ó o& ñ ³ ðr © u (Liquid Crystal Display, LCD) _ Ñ þ s à Ô6 x F g " é ¶ Ü ¼ Ð F g# 3 0 A > 6 x
÷
& ¦ e [4, 5]. Ä ºo ¢ ¸ô Ç LED ¸" î í ß \ O ` ¦ 21 [ j l
$ í © 1 l x§ 4 í ß \ O Ü ¼ Ð & ñ # LED_ ½ ¨> hµ 1 Ï\ ' a ô
Ç Ð× ¼ë s` ¦ à ºw n % i ¦ / B N/ B N l ' a` ¦ × æd Ü ¼ Ð LED ¸
"
î l l _ 6 x S X @ /\ ¦ Æ Ò ¦ e H © S ! s . LED ¸
"
î l l _ 6 x s S X @ /÷ &l 0 AK " f H õ ° ú É r r ©
¨ 8
â & h כ ¹ ÷ r m LED ¸" î _ ´ òÖ ¦ ¾ Ó © , F g < ƽ ¨
¸_ þ j& h o, + þ AF g ^ l Õ ü t 1 p x ¸" î l l _ $ í 0 p x` ¦ ¾ Ó © r
v 9 H ª ô Ç ¸§ 4 s כ ¹½ ¨ ) a [6–9].
LED ê ø Í l : r& h Ü ¼ Ð o½ + ËÓ ü t ì ø Í ¸^ Ð ½ ¨$ í ) a s ¸× ¼ _
ª é ß \ í H ~ ½ Ó ¾ ÓÜ ¼ Ð À Ó\ ¦ f Ë 9 Å Ò# Q ] X ½ + Ë8 £ x  Ò
H s Ö ¸$ í 8 £ x \ " f ü < & ñ / B N _ ½ + Ë\ _ K y n Cs ~ ½ Ó Ø
¦ ÷ & H ì ø Í ¸^ è s . & ³F © ´ ú §s 6 x ÷ & ¦ e H Ñ þ
Ò o LED_ ½ ¨ ¸ H # l " é ¶ s µ 1 Ï F g Û ¼& 7 à Ô! 3 \ ¸ l
#
H ' õ AÒ o LED } 9 (chip) 0 A\ © ¨ 8 Ó ü t| 9 + þ AF g
^
¸ í÷ &# Q e H ½ ¨ ¸s . â Ä º\ " f H, H ü @
` ¦ ~ ½ ÓØ ¦ H LED 0 A\ H ü @ ` ¦ R( À 1 Ïç ß Ò o), G(0 l q Ò
o) Õ ªo ¦ B( ê ø ÍÒ o) Ð ¨ 8 H © + þ AF g ^ \ ¦ ¸
í # Ò ot à º Z } É r ¸" î 1 p x` ¦ ½ ¨$ í l ¸ ô Ç [1].
s
Qô Ç ~ ½ ÓZ O É r J v f ç (packaging) / B N& ñ s é ß í H ¦
§
4 è ¸\ ¦ × ¦{ 9 Ã º e # Q" f & ³F ¸" î l l 6 x Ñ þ Ò oLED
Ð © ´ ú §s s 6 x ÷ & ¦ e . s â Ä º + þ AF g ^ H LED } 9 0
A\ { 9 & ñ ô Ç ¿ ºa Ð ¸ í÷ & z ´o B H Ã ºt > \ P _ 4 x t
] j(encapsulant)\ ¦Ø Ô> [ O Ê ê LED } 9 0 A\ { 9 & ñ ô
Ç + þ A © Ü ¼ Ð ` ¦ 9 . t ë ß s ü < ° ú É r + þ AF g ^ 0 Au
C \ P É r Ñ þ Ò o LED ´ òÖ ¦ \ H a % ~ t · ú § É r % ò ¾ Ó` ¦ p 2 ;
. = + þ AF g ^ ' õ AÒ oF g \ _ K # l ) a Ê ê F ~ ½ Ó Ø
¦ H y n C É r 1 p x ~ ½ Ó& h (isotropic) X <, s × æ ´ ú § É r  Òì r s
r LED} 9 \ _ K F f ¨ à º | ¨ c à º e l M :ë H s . Ö ¦
∗