• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

IEG 환경지질연구정보센터

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IEG 환경지질연구정보센터"

Copied!
12
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)‚“æ~>Æ·~ã²æ. VF¶ò. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003. ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&(II). ‚;ç Án«W ÁJJ' Áš"; Á*Ò> Áff" Áf;> ÁWš~ Áöš; 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. ^&v æ’ʂ"", (")‚BúæîÚç, ‚“>¶öÒ >¶ö’² 2. 1. 3. Improvement of Groundwater Well Recovery by Hydrofracturing. Á. Á. Á. Á. Á. Á. J.S. Hahn1 J.S. Ahn2 Y.Y. Yun2 J.H. Lee2 J.S. Jeon2 E.J. Kim2 H.S. Kim3 G.H. Baek3 E.J. Won3 1. Á. Á. Dept. Earth System Sciences, Yonsei University, 2Hans Engineering CO., Ltd, 3Korea Water Institute. ABSTRACT To increase the yield from groundwater wells in various rock types by hydrofracturing, tests of 12 wells were carried out as a part of sustainable groundwater development and artificial recharge project. Test wells are selected 5 wells in Jurassic granites, 2 wells in Cretaceous volcanics, 4 wells in Cretaceous sedimentary rocks and one well in Pre-Cambrian gneiss. The results show that specific capacity of 11 wells increased about 7% to 366%, while a well in Cretaceous sedimentary rock decreased about 43.4% owing to plugging of fault clay. Meanwhile, impact distances influenced due to hydrofracturing ranged from 5.4 m to 82.7 m from the test wells, actual drawdown data measured during the pumping test after hydrofracturing are more or less decreased and reveals balanced drawdown. Key words : Hydrofracturing, Specific capacity, Impact distances. º £ ^. æ³'ž æ~>BB 5 Ž·VF Òë~ ¢~b‚ '« zCöB O;B &;~ ÖÂïj Ã&ÊV *šB 12B ²~ Öbö ž>{2êþj ~& . þ;f ’¢V z;z 4B æöB 5, WkV zÖz 2B æö B 2, WkV 'z 3B æöB 4, Ò FÆ2ÒjV Þîz æöB 1j F;~& . 12~ þ; öB 11f j·>ïš 7%öB 366%ræ Ã&>î . æ WkV 'z æ~ 1òš [6Æ~ öïb‚ j·>ïš 43.4% ;ê 6²~& . 4B²~ –;æöB þÖ"º þ;b‚¦V 5.4 möB 82.7 mræ 'Ëj ~º ©b‚ ¾æ¾–, ž>{2ê~ 'Ëb‚ Òê &>W þ &G;öB ;~ f 'Úræò, ;Dz >*;~*çj š ® . "BÚ : ž>{2êV», j·>ï, 'Ë–Ò 1.. B †. ’º *¶ö š~–, >҂ š~æò Ï' Gš öB š†'ÁVF' ^¦Ò“f jB çš . 2001j 12úö “Ú æ~> &;f C 1,077,697Bš–,  7 ÖÂïš 1¢ 30 m òž Öbš 46%ž 495,551 B²š . 2001j ö *Ò £ 208ò«š šÏ~º 10,964 B²~ *šç>ê~ £ 76.3%ž 8,478B²& æ~>¢ >. “ÚöB æ~> ¶ö~ &Òº 2&æ GšöB > Ú¢ ‚ . Ѻ Vš BBB Öb~ >«Ë" WË FæÁBFj ۂ “æ' &Қ, v®º n;WÁ ãBWš ®º BBö ~‚ 7' &Қ .  . 3. 1). *Corresponding author : [email protected] : 2003. 5. 28 : 2003. 9. 19 : 2003. 12 30. ö7>¢ î~ 5 Æ~. ²Òߞ¢ ræ. 74.

(2) ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&(II). öb‚ ~ ®b– ,  7öB £ 49.9%& ’80jê š* ö J~B žêB Öb‚ /‚ BFš jº‚ çš . 6‚ ’80j&ö 2,249B²(20.2%), 90j& *>ö 1,833 (16.5%)B², ê>ö 1,330B²(12.0%)& J~ ÒÏ7ö ® Ú 10j šç žêB Öbš 88%¢ 6~ ® . ‚Þ, 2000j ö *Ò 45,938B²~ ö 7 B*® >聯b‚ öB Öbš 13,567B²‚B £ 29.5%ž. ;š . šf ?f Vš &Ö &; ö &šBº “Ú z> &>[ö ¦>º ž>{2êV»j 'Ï~ ÖÂË j Ã&Ò > ®rf b†,  æ~> BB  O; Ëj~ 7"W~ B‚ b‚ ‚'~ *~öB &;j J ~† > ìÚ .¾>º ÖÂ>ï~ ¦— öê š V» ~ 'Ϛ &Ë~ . æ~> BB ö ÖÂïj Ã&Ò Ï'b‚ Ú B 2, ¾Ò 5 Dry ice»š ê>îb¾ ¾Ò¾ Dry ice»f .ê¢ ½Ú¾æ á~&, F; Ú &Ê¢ šÏ‚ B2»f ç® ;v‚ êöræ BB>îb¾ *þW ~ ‚ê‚ BBš 7B çš . ¾ Ö b "æö &OB 2êj ÎN'b‚ jv' n;~ ² šjÁB’ʺ ž>{2ê»f Þ&~² BB> Ú æ~> Öëö šÏ>² >î . “ÚöBº 1989jêö çë' Ï'b‚ ž>{2ê Ëj& ê«>Ú N 5 æ~>BB  ÖÂË Ã&ö šÏ~&, šÚ 2~3&~ Ëj& º& ê«>î . ¾r ê«B “~ KyleÒ Ëjº 2&~ 3 bÊ Ê ²*¢ F{ÎV‚ ’ÿB 3,500 psi(245 kg/cm )~ {Kö 1,000 lÁmin ~ ÆÂïj <º æ~> ÖÂï à & *Ïb‚ BBB Ëj&b¾, 30B²öB çëÚ* Ö" N‚ «Ö>î . 1j êö * ³ëV>ÒöB ꫂ ATLAS COPCOÒ~ HFU 140 Ëjº 140 bar ~ {Kb‚ 350 lÁmin ~ ÆÂïj <º Ëj&b¾,  Ú* BB ã‚ n*Ò(?)‚ ÒϚ 7>î . *Òº ?f Vö "*ë¶& ꫂ ATLAS COPCO Ò~ Ëj& çÏb‚ &ÿ 7ö ®b¾, z«š¾ æî çf Ö¦B Ã&¶ò¾ &Ï 'f *Z‚ ;š . š Ò;b‚  V»ö &‚ ’¢ “æ³'ž æ~> BB 5 Ž·VF BBÒë”ö Ž~² >î, 1Njê 3B² Öbj Ž~ C 12B² Öbö &~ ‚ ž>{2êþ~ Ö"¢ þ¶ò‚ B~º ©š . ' þ;öB ‚ þf  ²æ Vol. 7 No 2 ö >ƒB ÿ BÏ~ ^ öB ²BB 2Þ~ Òff ? f ";j –ö ªC‚ ©š . 2). 3). 75. 2.. ’O».  ’öB j‚ ž>{2ê ’·ë Protocolf Fig. 1" ? . Fig. 1~ Protocolf >7ÎV²*¢ J~~ ÒÏ7ž Öbö &‚ ©š–, B‚º þ&ç Öb~ çö V ¢ çV Protocolö &~º ·ë";ö ~– *Ëþj. ~& .  ’º æ7ö {>¢ ;B "«~ Vš ~ ÒB’, {Ë 5 Ó²Î" ö ~š ·>ïj Ã&Ê. 4). 2. −1. −1. 5). Fig. 1. Flow chart of works (2002, Hahn & Yun). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003.

(3) ‚;çÁn«WÁJJ'Áš";Á*Ò>Áff"Áf;>ÁWš~Áöš;. 76. º ©š Ï'šæ‚ Öb~ *Òç~ j>Ëj ï&~ V *šB Ò* &>Wþj ~&, ž>{2ê þ O ~ J~æ6j Ö;~V *šB Ò* Ú TV¦[j ~& . ž>{2ê þ~ O º žËO (Extension packer) f {Ë; O (Inflatble packer)¢ ÒÏ~&º :, "‚ &ö’*š Z {Ë; O ¢ ÒÏ~&, æ[~ 2ê& ~ O ö ¶çj * ÖJ& ®º öBº žËO. ¢ ÒÏ~& . Òê TV¦[f ž>{2ê ·ëb‚ WB Öb ãö æ;š¾ æ*¢ {ž† Ï'b‚ ê~&b¾, Ö b b~ çê& ¸–¾ Ú šz¢~ ²*b‚ ÿ¢‚ bÒÚ 'çj Ạ©š –~ ®&Ë~ ²V~ W"ö º ~æ á~& . Òê &>W þf &/' Ò* &>W þöB ÒÏ B Ëjf ?f Ëj‚ ÿ¢‚ –š(·>* 2~4* V &)öB þƃ ~& . ö¾ þ~ Ï'ö ~~š Ò*" Òê þ æ~> * ;~¢ ?² Fæ~šB  r Ã&B j>ïj G; ~ Ã&Nj ï&~¢ † ©š¾, B‚ æ~>* ; ~¢ ÿ¢~² Fæʺ ©f *Ë ·ëöBº ®&Ë Table 1. Well Inventory for Hydrofracturing Test. B®. ®. 1. G-1. 2. IW-4. 3. O-9. 4. GW-1. 5. KYC-11. 6. KJD-1. 7. KYC-3. 8. KCG-1. 9. KCG-2. 10. KYA-1. 11 12. KYS-1 KYS-2. *~ &* FW’ >ÿÒ s– Κ F~Ò – šÿš êïÒ žÂ 귒 w ÿ ' Zÿ êê– –Úš z*Ò '– z֚ &nÒ †– æÂš ÂÒ †– æÂš ÂÒ 'z– â^š BcÒ &* FW’ nÖÿ &* FW’ nÖÿ. æî ’¢V(?) ÚÎz;z ’¢V wÚÎz;z ’¢V ÚÎz;z ãVÞîz Ú j£Ö nz[ îw²z >¢ú[ (¢[–) ~Öÿ[ (¿ÿ[–) ~Öÿ[ (¿ÿ[–) ÏÖw²z ÚÎz;z ÚÎz;z. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003. Žb‚,  ’öBº &/' Ò*ÁÒê~ j>Nj ÿ ¢~² Fæ‚ ê æ~>* ;~~ æz‚ ÖÂB j·> ï~ Ã&‚¦V ·>ï~ Ã&¢ ï&ƃ >¯~& . 3.. þ&ç Öb~ F;. B†öB Þ/‚ :f ?š þ&ç Öbf 1) ÖbË j ;W, 2) &Ö ËKÖb, 3) 皂 æî, 4) 皂 æÚ’–ö ª~º ©b‚ F;V&j J;~& . VöB *"† > ìº ©f Öb ²F"¾ &Ò¶& Öb~ ¶Z¢ ÖJ~ £² ÿ–~æ pj öz, J Ò Î –šš <ºÚ^ ® šê 5Ê Þ 2&& êÁ «† > ®º *š ®Ú¢ þš &Ë~ º 6š . š‚ 6j J~ F;‚ Öbf Table 1" ? . 4.. >^æî *ê >{2ê ßW. º ž>{2ê~ *;'ž "«{-"«Fï~ *šKF š . VB º :f ?š þ’*ö bj "«~ {K j &~² >š >ª šÚö z>’*š 2ê>–, .V Fig. 2. 6,7). ê º;ÖÂï (m). (m3d−1). 200. 100. 224. 40. 130. 30. 67. 100. 80. 40. 95. 30. 100. 30. 188. 50. 250. 70(?). 80. 40. 91 74. 50(?) 80. Ïê ‚Ï> _ºþbË &G; _ºþbË &G; ãžÚ~ '˖ÒÏ æ~>V. –Ò ³ëÏ>‚ ÒÏ7 æ~>V. –ÒÏ ³ëÏ>Ï ³ëÏ>Ï æ~>V. –ÒÏ šbFæÏ> šbFæÏ>. F;ÒF. Ãþ ¦ÃN þ –; –; þ; 1– zÖz w²z 'z 'z 'z zÖz –; –;.

(4) ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&(II). 77. º 18B &Î ÆÏšJ Òë öB æ~’– b(V6)~ Jê¶ò‚ G;B ž>{2êþ W"‚ B 129š~ ¶ò¢ >^æî*ê‚ ;҂ ©š . Table 2~ Ö"º žæ~’–b~ ³Wç ·‚ æ î 5 æÚ’–’¢ ¢~æ á~&, G;ê 5 ¶ ò~ Q¶öB B‚f ®  Òò>¾ &Ú'ž ãËj 2k~º–º – ZÒº ìj ©š . Table 2öB š .V2ê{f ‚&~& z;zöB 22.1 MPa, êJW 'zöB 16.75 MPaš–, ‚²8f æ WzöB 2.39 MPa, C²zöB 11.41 MPa ;êš . (Ò)B’{f ‚&~& C²zöB 13.82 MPa, êJ W 'zöB 11.4 MPaš, ‚²~º æWzöB 1.29 MPa, êJW'zöB 2.82 MPa‚B [Ò& ¾ BB 'z[öB ¸f 8j šº ©š šj“ . š ¶ò‚¦V ·>ï Ã&¢ Ï'b‚ ~º ž>{ 2ê~ ãÖ Vš j B’Á{Ëʚ Ϫ~æ‚ Ëj~ ‚& "«{š £ 140 bar ;êš Ïª† ©b‚ º;B . *æ z>~ žË;êº z«ö V¢ Nš& ®Ææò 0.83 MPa~9.8 MPa ;Ꚗ , .V 2ê{" *æ z> žË;ê *~ ç&&êº Fig. 3ö êB :f ?š y=0.3878x + 0.4909š . ‚Þ, æ~> ÖÂï Ã&¢ *‚ ž>{2ê~ ãÖ º B’{š 7º‚ ~¢ < ®bæ‚ *æ z> žË;êf ç&&ê¢ ê~š Fig. 4f ?š y = 0.2156x+3.4147š . æ~>~ " Fÿۂº æ7ö BB š,  8-24). Table 2. Fig. 2. Time-pressure flow rate diagram.. 2ê(P ) šêö &{j 7æ~š ¢;‚ {Kž ö ê{(P )ö ê~² B . š {Kf j Fæʺ – jº‚ {K" ?–¾ £* ’V r^ö &B š ö >çb‚ ·Ï~º ‚² >ï"wK(S )j ¾æ¾² B. . ¯, b s. h. 27). Sh = Ps. ‚Þ, öêšê  {Kj &~V ·~š .V2 ê{K(P ) ç® Ôf ¢;‚ {Kö ê~² > º– š {Kj B’{(P )š¢ ~–, š‚¦V *æ ~ z> žË;ê(In-situ tensile strength, T )¢ ’† > ® . ¯, b. r. hf. Thf = Pb − Pr Table 2. Hydrofracturing Test Results by hydrogeological Unit. >^æî* *Ú êJW'z .V2ê{ C²z æWz &«z;z *Ú êJW'z C²z B’{ æWz &«z;z *Ú êJW'z C²z z>žËK æWz &«z;z. Ûê. * : MPa) ¶ò>. (. ‚². 0.10. ï. 78. 0.90. ‚&. 2.39 7.42 11.41 2.39 2.69 1.29 2.82 7.08 1.29 1.86 0.83 1.79 4.24 0.91 0.83. 7.14 8.69 11.61 6.90 6.87 3.41 4.51 7.30 3.50 2.96 2.76 2.79 4.27 2.73 2.76. 11.02 11.37 14.75 11.03 10.23 6.25 6.62 9.14 6.27 5.56 4.76 4.86 5.61 4.73 4.66. 10.67 10.86 13.34 10.98 8.87 5.84 6.60 7.83 5.86 4.81 4.49 4.62 5.56 4.52 4.00. 16.43 14.70 19.02 16.47 14.73 9.67 8.15 12.02 9.95 8.82 7.28 7.29 7.00 7.10 7.98. 22.10 16.75 20.91 19.50 22.10 13.82 11.40 13.82 13.60 13.20 9.80 8.02 7.09 9.80 9.50. 129 20 4 76 29 129 20 4 76 29 129 20 4 76 29. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003.

(5) ‚;çÁn«WÁJJ'Áš";Á*Ò>Áff"Áf;>ÁWš~Áöš;. 78. Fig. 3. Correlation between breakdown pressure and in-situ tensile strength.. Fig. 5. Well depth vs well yield.. Table 3. Well Depth vs. Percentage of Well Yield. jÖÂï. z« Þîz~ *Zz+Þîz z;z ê Fig. 4. Correlation between fracture reopening pressure and insitu tensile strength.. ~ ªº æ‚ ¦"öB &Ë ôš ª>– êö V ¢ 6²‚ º ©š ;Jš . Heim(1878) ~ »f >ïwK" >çwKš ?jæº ê 1 km ;ê¢ B ‚ê‚ "c‚ : ®, Hoek " Brown(1980) f &Û 500 m šÚöBº >ïwKš >çwK ’æ‚ .Ò  š B &Ë~¾ ê 1 km šçöBº ~ Bf ÚJÚ ©b‚ ~& . f>;(2002) f *¢^öB ‚>ê 7¦öB  (.Ò)~ ï Bêº 570 m ;ꚾ wK’ö V ¢ Nš& ®Ú Îï-·Ö[ wK’öBº 370 m, º& _ ’–-ãn[ wK’öBº 570 m, 7& 'z wK’öBº 250 m, Ò & 'z wK’öBº 890 m ;ê‚ VF~& . š‚ ª ßWb‚ ê& p²>š Öb~ Ö Âïf 6²~² >º–, Davis & Turk(1964) º “ ~ Ö;îz(zWz 5 æWz)öB Öbêf ÖÂïj –Ò~ Fig. 5¢ B~&b– ê 700 ft(213 m)~ 1,000 ft(305 m)  pf Öbf Ï'š jî¢ V F~& . 25). 26). 27). 28). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003. 80% 72 75. 85% 80 78. ®Ž. 90% 88 82. ¶ò> 14 9 5 28. ‚;ç(1982) f “ÚöB 28B Öb~ êf jÖ ïj –Ò~ Table 3" Fig. 6j ·W~&, Öbê & 80 m ;Ꚛ * ÖÂï~ 85% ;ê~ bš ÖÂ> æ‚ Öbj Z·; p² 2º ©f jãB'š¢ VF ‚ : ® . 6‚, Öb~ ê& Ã&Žö V¢ j·>ï~ Ã&N f 6²~º– ê 30 möBº j·>ïf 0.16 m d ~0.76 m d ;êš, ê 40 möBº 0.1 m d ~0.5 m d š–, ê 60 möBº 0.04 m d ~0.21 m d ‚ * &~²  8š 6²~ &  š~ êöBº j·>ï f –~ B‚(0) çB 2N FÎf –~ ìº © b‚ VF‚ : ® . š‚ B>ғb‚¦V æ~> ·>ï Ã&¢ Ï'b ‚ ~º ž>{2ê~ &ç’*f š†ç ê 80 m ; ê& ‚êš–,   pf êöBº ß>‚ æî’ –& B>Ú ®æ pº ‚  Î"º ßê® V&>æ pº . 29). 2 −1. 2 −1. 2 −1. 2 −1. 2 −1. 2 −1. 29). 5.. ž>{2êþ. ' þ;ê‚ "«ê 5 "«N> ê‚ "«*".

(6) ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&(II). 79. KöB æ[~ š 2ê 6º B’>Ú  îb‚ b š "«>Ú {Kš ;~>º *çj š ® .  ~ B’º "«· ê 1ª šÚö B>º ãÖ& &¦ ªšîb–, KJD-1" ?f ãÖº £ 7ª ã"ræ { Kö Â]‚ æz¢ £j > ìî . ö¾ ž>{2êþ öº "«*-"«Fïö & ‚ ;& ç® 7º~¾  ’ö ÒÏB Ëjº æ ~>&;~ {Ëj "Ï'b‚ B·B ËjB "« *-"«Fïö &‚ ¶òº ~æ á~& . 6.. ž>{2êV» Î"ªC. ·>ï Ã& þ &ç 12ö &‚ Ò*ÁÒê &>Wþ Ö" ¢ Table 5ö ~& . Ò*ÁÒê &>W þf ž>{2êþb‚ &ç Öb~ bÒ' ç ¯, ÖÂïš âî¾ Ã&>º& ~ º 6¶ò~ ³b‚ Ï'š W>æ‚ ® 2~4  *j öb‚ ~&b–, Vš ¶ò& &ς Öbö Bº Ò* &>W þf ~æ p Vš ¶ò¢ š Ï~ ªC~& . Table 5öB š *Ú 12~ þ; 7 11B~ j ·>ïš 7%~366.8%ræ Ã&~ ž>{2ê š*¾ " >*¢ ;~Î š ÖÂïf ç® Ã&F ©š . >^æî* ê‚ š ’¢V~ z;z æöBº j·>ï~ 18.8%~99.6%, R>ïê>& 23.4%~85.2% 6.1.. Fig. 6. Well depth vs. percentage of well yield.. ‚& "«{f Table 4ö ;Ò~& . Table 4öB º :f ?š ’ö ÒÏB {²*~ VêWËf 140 bar‚ 350 lÁmin ~ Fïj /† > ®º Ëjšæò B *ËþöBº 63 kg/cm & ‚& "«{šîb–, &¦ª~ ãÖ 40 kg/cm ~50 kg/cm ~ { −1. 2. 2. 2. Table 4. Time-Pressure Records during Hydrofracturing. ê "«²> 1N 1N O. ® ê "« "« "« 2N "« "« 3N "« O. ê "« "« (bgl-m) * {K * {K * {K (bgl-m) * {K (.) (kg/cm ) (.) (kg/cm ) (.) (kg/cm ) (.) (kg/cm ) 1. 2. G-1 IW-4 O-9 GW-1 KYC-11 KJD-1 KYC-3 KCG-1 KCG-2 KYA-1 KYS-1 KYS-2. 30 39 23 25 8.5 25 22.5 41.4 47.6 22.5 13.4 34. 840 360 120 40 187 200 50 300 240 240 173 130. 25 48 35 40 25 25 44.5 63 49 19 20 20. 2. − 660 120 60 210 215 258 150 220 140 50 140. − 52 35 39 13.5 25 43.7 48 49 6 20 12. 2. − − 420 60 288 310 200 − − 160 30 190. − − 43 38 15 21.9 37.5 − − 10 20 9. 2. − 27 − 37 − − − 47.6 34.9 − − −. − 240 180 180 − − 230 640 340 150 180 −. − 45 33 55 − − 25 49 39 13 20 −. ê "«²> 2N 3N "« "« "« "« * {K * {K (.) (kg/cm ) (.) (kg/cm ). 2. 2. − − 420 180 − − 130 − 300 300 180 −. − − 35 57 − − 28.5 − 30 5 15 −. 2. − − − 360 − − 240 − − − − −. − − − 55 − − 22.5 − − − − −. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003.

(7) ‚;çÁn«WÁJJ'Áš";Á*Ò>Áff"Áf;>ÁWš~Áöš;. 80. Table 5. Productivity Growth Analysis of 12 Wells by Hydrofrcturing. þ; G-1. IW-4. ¯;’ &*7 FW’ —«ÿ 179-5 ;öê s– Κ F~Ò 136-5. *~. (m) j· R>ï >^æî* j>N ¶>* æ~>* j >* >*;~ï (m>ïd ) (mê>d ) &~ê> æîª (m d ) (BGL-) (BGL-) (m) 5.31 13.79 8.48 12.9 16.8 2.4Ü10 ’¢V ÚÎ 108.88 ·> 3.3Ü10 139.78 4.55 11.59 7.04 19.9 26.6 z;z +28.7% +64.3% +58.1% +37.1% ’¢V wÚÎ 38.5 8.12 55.97 47.85 0.80 0.34 2.87Ü10 z;z 5 48.8 7.58 44.11 36.53 1.34 0.61 3.17Ü10 ·> ÖWî z;z +26.8% +66.1% +77.6% +10.4% B-test:'02. 5. 31  9.43Ü10 30 4.05 30.15 26.10 1.15 0.81 2.88Ü10 O-9 2.53 4.55 4.67 0.12 O-10 A-test :'02. 5. 31 ’¢V 2.88Ü10 50 O-9 wÚÎ 5.13 (CTD-Diver Ë?-z¦Ç¦ z;z 7.04Ü10 0.2 O-10 SWOË(34m ç–) 1.50 30.8 2.26 A-test : '02.6.19 Ò  +85.2% +46.4% 4.08 17.73 13.65 +99.6% O-9 šC®&(Di245 Ë?) (+103%) z¦öB Ǧ¶ò‚ šC 77 2.24 35.39 33.15 2.322 5.402 ãVÞîz 62.2 ·> 2.98 13.11 10.13 6.140 2.555 wÚÎÞîz -19.2% 164.4% -52.7% 2ê& 6.812 16.7~17 m ² 2.28 35.39 33.11 4.891 [&(?) 3 −1. 3 −1. 3 −1. −5. 127o17'36'' 36o20'37''. −5. −4. 127o52'51'' 37o34'34''. −4. -4 -6. O-9. ãVê – šÿš êïÒ 484-1. 127o23'11'' 38o04'07''. -6. -3. 126o42'9.6'' 37o34'19.5''. -. GW-1. žÂ 귒 w ÿ ’·. 126o42'10.0'' 37o34'19.5''. 126o42'10.4'' 37o34'19.5''. 126o42'10.0'' 37o34'19.2''. GH-1 18.5 m. [z' GH-2 15.2 m. [z' GH-3 27.4m. [6Æ 7Ò 34m ‚ãš ÏÖw²z 21~21.3m 24~80.5m :F& &j(%) KYA(T). &j(%) KYA-1. 'z– ë« BcÒ. KYA(O) X:136,784.5 Y:158.,22.5. &j(%) KYA-1. &j(%) KYA(T). &j(%) KYA(O). KSY-1. &* FW’ nÖÿ. &j(%) ÚÎz;z X:324,044 Y:226,925.0. 7.85~11.3m 36.6~38.9m 69.5 76.0m (%). ! &j. -. -18.65%. -. -. 2.03 2.64. 17.2 9.25. 15.17 6.61. -. 5.082 2.599 -48.9%. 1.85e-5 0.0049 26,485%. ·>. -. 2.23. 9.25. 7.02. -. 0.769 3.402 +342.4%. -. ². -. 2.08 2.70. 3.73 6.17. 1.65 3.47. -. 8.922 4.367 -51.1%. 0.0092 0.0074 -19.6%. ·>. -. 2.26. 6.17. 3.91. -. 8.283 8.632 +4.2%. -. ². -. 2.23 2.79. 4.66 7.74. 2.43 4.95. -. 8.210 5.552 -32.4%. 0.004 0.00094 -76.5%. ·>. -. 2.36. 7.74. 5.38. -. 5.873 4.926 -16.1%. -. ². 40 40. 4.10 3.56. 9.78 8.28. 5.68 4.72. 0.03 8.48. 5.23 6.02. 7.3 10-4 7.35 10-4. 20.63. 15.11. 0.68. -. Ü Ü. ·>. Ü Ü ·> 2.66Ü10 ·> 7.65Ü10. -. 3.97 2.78. 7.36 5.03. 3.39 2.25. -. 7.0 8.31 18.71. 1.87 10-5 9.63 10-5 414.97. -. 2.77 3.50. 3.27 4.49. 0.5 0.99. -. 6.44 7.34 13.96. -3. -. 4.48 5.10. 9.78 8.26. 5.30 3.18. -. 7.72 6.46 -16.32. -. ². -. 3.97 2.78. 7.36 5.03. 3.39 2.25. -. 9.85 11.33 15.03. -. ². -. 2.98 3.50. 3.27 4.49. 0.29 0.99. -. 17.35 16.95 -2.31. -. ². 30.5 40.0. 5.37 3.2. 13.69 12.38. 8.32 9.18. 3.67 4.36. 1.55 2.31. 4.6 10-5 1.17 10-4. 18.80. 49.03. 154.8. 31.4. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003. -4. -71.24. Ü Ü. ·>.

(8) ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&(II) Table 5. Continued. þ;. ¯;’. *~. 81. (m) j· R>ï >^æî* j>N ¶>* æ~>* >* >*;~ï (m>ïd ) (mê>d ) &~ê> æîª (m d ) (BGL-) (BGL-) (m) ÚÎz;z 60.7 0.7 6.62 5.92 10.25 8.5 4.61Ü10 79 0.6 6.78 6.18 12.78 27.3~29.0m 10.49 5.77Ü10 3 −1. 3 −1. j. 3 −1. -3 -3. KSY-2. &* FW– nÖÿ ' Zÿ. X:324,210.0 Y:27,233.5. 160-4. 128o27'59'' 35o53'19''. KJD-1. êê– –Úš z*Ò 32-15. X:117.450 Y:135.155. KYC-3. '– z֚ &n2Ò. 128o49'06'' 36o01'57''. KYC-11. 54.3~57.4m 68.2~72.8m (%). &j &j(%) j£Ö nz[ 40.2~44.3m 59.0~65.5m. îw²z >¢ú[(¢[–) 26.8~27.1m 72.5~73.8m 91.5~92.1m. ~Öÿ[ (†[) ¿ÿ[–. KCG-1. †– æÂš ÂÒ 50. KCG-2 X:275.880 Y:156.058. †– æÂš ÂÒ50. X:275,870 Y:156,100. 24.68. 23.41. 25.16. -. 0.86 2.35. 6.62 6.78. 5.76 4.43. -. 4.06 5.01 23.40. -. ². 40 40 -. 2.52 1.80. 54.82 13.0. 52.3 11.2. 0.765 3.571 366.8. 1.420 3.052 114.93. -. ·>. 11 30 172.7. 15.66 15.33. 22.55 32.88. 6.89 17.55. 1.60 1.71 7.0. 0.5 0.57 14.5. 9.12 10-5 9.93 10-5 8.9. Ü Ü. ·>. 40 40 -. 13.48 9.5. 88.01 64.79. 74.53 54.29. 0.537 0.737 27.14. 0.214 0.259 6.95. 1.28 10-4 3.67 10-4 65.12. Ü Ü. ·>. 0 0. 24.58 43.68. 24.58 43.68. 1.22 0.69 -43.4. 0.7 0.14 -79.58. 0.55 0.3. 1.11 0.97. 0.56 0.67. -. 0.74 0.16 -78.4. 30 30 (%). &j -. &j(%). -3 -3. -0.9. -. 0.26 20.34. 25.48 43.68. 24.32 23.34. -. 0.73 0.14 -8.1. -. ². KCG-2. -. 0.21 -. 0.97 -. 0.76 -. -. 3.9 -. -. ². 28 29.2. 0.9 1.75. 61.11 56.88. 60.21 55.13. 0.46 0.53. 0.15 0.24. 1.89 10-4 4.01 10-4. 13.21. 66.7. 112.17. -. 0.08 0.15 87.5. -. 8.3~8.5m 40.5~41.8m 73.3~73.6m (%). &j &j(%). 4.3 -. 0.89 32.28. Ã&~&, 'z æöBº j·>ïš 7%~366.8%, R>ïê>& 15.1%~114.9% Ã&~ z«ö V¢ · ~² ¾æ¾º ©j r > ® . æWzž Þîzf 1~ ¶ò<ö ì ¾î Ò* &>Wþ ¶ò~ šCö ^B& ®Ú R>ïê>~ & jº Wš ìbæ‚ j·>ïj š 164.4% Ã&‚ ©b‚ ¾æ¾ ® . š ¶òº ‚“~ 'z æöB ž>{2êö ~ ‚ æ~>ÖÂï Ã&Î"º ç&'b‚ Ô º ©j  Ò~º ©š . '˺* ž>{2êþ~ '˲ Úæº '˺*¢ ;W' b‚ ï&~º O»f þ; ž"ö &G;š ®Ú ž >{2êþ 7 6º þ *Áê~ &>W þö G ;B >*;~ ¶ò‚¦V ÖbË~ æ~>vª ·ç~ 6.2.. Ü Ü ·> ®ïšö 1.14Ü10 ·>, &G; 1.13Ü10 1.01 10-3 1.25 10-4 -86.48. KCG-1. ~Öÿ[(†[) KCG-2. 31.15. ·>. 61.11 56.88. 60.22 24.60. Ü Ü. ·> ². æz¢ ï&~º ©š . C 12B²~ þ 7 4B²ö B '˺*¢ º;† > ®º ¶ò& >÷>îb– Table 6ö ‚~& .  G-1~ ãÖº ž>{2êþ  bj 25 kg/cm ~ {Kb‚ "«Žb‚B ç~’V’*b‚ 82.7 m ç– ‚ æ6ö *~‚ &G;~ æ~>*& £ 0.56 m ;ê ç߂ ©š . &G;"~ Қº ~ º·ö ¦æ‚B ¾&æ çš¾ >ÿÒ îj~ ~Â;çb‚ j ’~ çj ゠æb‚ º;B . ž>{2ê¢ 2002j 1ú 31¢ Jê 3 23ª¦V ·~&º– &G;öBº 57ª ê¦V æ~>*& BB ® çß~ & "«B 1* 13ª êöº ‚&‚ 0.56 m ;êræ ç߂ ê BB® ~;~V ·~& . ^‚ þ;öBº "«B ê 4ª êö ‚& 25 kg/cm ræ 6.2.1. G-1. 2. 2. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003.

(9) ‚;çÁn«WÁJJ'Áš";Á*Ò>Áff"Áf;>ÁWš~Áöš;. 82. Fig. 8. Groundwater level patterns before and after hydrofracturing at GW-1 well field. Fig. 7. Time-groundwater level and temperature during hydrofracturing at G-1 well.. >{š çß>î & BB® ~;>îb– 14ª ÿn " «~& .  þ;j 7b‚ ÿÁÎÁB OËb‚ £ 5 m ç– ~ 3B~ &G;š *~~º þ; 1–‚ ž>{2ê þ *Áê~ &>W þ æ~>* ;~ç& Fig. 8 ö ê>Ú ® . Fig. 8öB š 77 m d  j>N‚ Ò*&>W  þ þ; æ~>*& 35.4 mræ ~;Žö V¢ ÿã ~ &G; GH-1f 15.7 m, Îã~ &G; GH-2º 4.5 m Ò Bã~ &G; GH-3f 5.7 m ~;~ ÿã~ GH-1 &G;~ æ~>*& 2~3V Ôj^B ‚ ®; ç¢ & . >š, 66.2 m d ~ j>N‚ Òê &>W þöº þ;~ æ~>*& 13.1 mræ ~;Žö V ¢ GH-1f 9.3 m, GH-2º 6.2 m Ò GH-3f 7.7 m ‚ ~;>Ú Ò* &>Wþf jv~ GH-1f 6.4 m 6.2.2. GW-1. 3 −1. 3 −1. & ‚ Ôjê >š GH-2 5 GH-3öBº '' 1.7 mf 2.0 m& z Ôjr . šº 53 kg/cm {Kb‚ ž>{2êþö ~š š ÖbË~ >ã 5.4 mræº Vš &¢ š² {Ë B æ~>& ' OËöB ;'b‚ F«B –ö Vž ~º ©b‚ šCB . 2. 5 KCG-2  þ;*~ *~ –Òº 47.9 m‚ ‚N& &Û 3.3 m ;êž jò‚ ’¯æ~ ïê‚ jîšö O;>î. . . KCG-1;f ú~ ç&, ç&'b‚ ¸f * ~ž KCG-2º æ~ 0.45 mö æ~>*& ®î . KCG-1 Öbf ž>{2ê êöê KCG-1~ >vº *® ú ~ ç&b¾, KCG-2 ÖböB ž>{2ê êö æ~ >*º KCG-1š æ~ 2.1 m, KCG-2& æ~ 2.8 m‚Ž Ô² ;W>î . Ò KCG-2öB ž>{2ê KCG-1" KCG-2öB ® z²ï [6Æ(?)& Dž b š ÆÂ>î . š¢ Îê‚ ê~š Fig. 9f ? . Fig. 9¢ š KCG-2 Öbj V&b‚ æ~ 32 m~ 48 m Қö ª~ ®º b{[ö KCG-2öB 6.2.3. KCG-1. Table 6. Impact Distances by Hydrofracturing. þ; >*;~(m) &G;1(m) &G;2(m) &G;3(m) ® –Ò Ò* Òê –Ò Ò* Òê –Ò Ò* Òê –Ò Ò* Òê G-1 0 &{ - 82.7 0 +0.5 − − − − − −. GW-1. 0. 35.4. 13.1. 4.5. 15.7. 9.3. 5. 4.5. 6.2. 5.4. 5.7. 7.7. KCG-1. 0. 9.8. 4.1. 5.52. 7.36. 3.97. 12.73. 2.77. 3.56. −. −. −. KYA-1. 0. ú~. 2.1. 47.9. 0.45. 2.8. −. −. −. −. −. −. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003. j HF &G;>*çß HF‚  š² B HF‚  š² B HF‚ [6Æ šÿ, b{[ 2ê.

(10) ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&(II). 83. Fig. 9. Groundwater variation before and after hydrofracturing at KCG-1 & KCG-2 well field.. KCG-1 ãb‚ &'ê‚ ãÒê ²[š B~,  [ö 7ÒB z²ï [6Æ& KCG-2 öB ‚ 49 kg/cm {K~ ž>{2ê‚ &J KCG-1 b‚ ÆÂ>îbæ‚ š ÖbËöB '˺*º 'Úê 47.9 m šçš¢ ç;B . ^‚ KCG-1 öBº O ê 41.4 m~ 1ê ž >{2êþöBº jZ 6{*çš ìîæò O. ê 47.6 mž 2ê þöBº 6{*ç" Žþ '.ï ûbš ÆÂ>î, KCG-2öB ž>{2ê šê z²ï bš KCG-1öB VÂ>îbæ‚ &Ú'b‚ b {[~ [êº ‚² 6.2 m šçb‚ ï&B . ž>{2êþ šêö æ~>*& Ôjê ©f b{ [ ~¦ &>[~ æ~>*~ >vræ Ôjê ©b‚ š C>– . ¶Fš&>[~ >v £ 2.4 m ;ê Ô jê ©b‚ º;B . 2.  ÏÖw²zö æ~> V.–ÒÏb‚ O;B Öb‚ Fig. 10ö êB :f ?š ÿãb‚ 5.52 m, Bãb‚ 12.73 m –Òö &G;š J~>Ú ® . VBê 19 kg/cm ~ ž>{2ê þ *~ j>N 40 m d ‚ ·> ;~B æ~>* ·çö j~ ?f j>N‚ þêö ·> æ~>*~ ;~B ·çf 6 6.2.4. KYA-1. 2. 3 −1. Fig. 10. Groundwater level patterns before and after hydrofracturing at KYA-1 well field.. š~² ¢^ ® . ¯, ÿã~ KYA(T) &G;öB æ~>* ;~ ·çš ç® BFB ©b‚ ¾æ¾ ®Ú 'Úê >ã 5.52 m ræº { ~² 'Ëj & ©b‚ š–, Bãb‚ 12.73 m ÎÚê &G; KYA(O)öB æ~>* ;~&  . ôš B‚ ©b‚ j æ~>~ F«š š² B~ ®rj r > ® . ¦;' Î" B²~ þ; 7öB KCG-1 1B Öbf ž> {2ê‚ ¦;'ž Î"¢ ¾æÚ ® . 6.3. 12. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003.

(11) ‚;çÁn«WÁJJ'Áš";Á*Ò>Áff"Áf;>ÁWš~Áöš;. 84. Table 7. Negative Effect from Hydrofracturing at KCG-1 & KCG-2 Well Field. ® KCG-1. Ò* 1.22. j·>ï(m d Òê. 3 −1. ). 6²N(%). 0.69. R>ïê>(m d ) Ò* Òê 6²N(%) 3 −1. 43.4. Öbf ž>{2ê *Áê ® ú~ ç& b¾, 2êþ êö >v& Â]~² Ôjê ©j 6æ † > ®î . Fig. 9öB º :f ?š ê 41.4 mö B 1ê þ º jZ æz& ìîb¾, 2ê‚  ê 47.6 mö O ¢ J~~ þ  '.ï ûbš ÆÂ>î . šº ç¦ö ®º ‚² vþ 6.2 m šçž b{[ ~ö O & ËO>Ú  ~¦ö 7ÒB ;[~ &>[š [Ò¢ Ž‚ Vš~ && {Ë>Ú ¾æ  *皖,  ;[~ &>[~ b{>vræ æ~>* & ;~>º Ö"¢ .¾‚ ©š . ¾ š 2ê ž >{2êþš KCG-1ö *&~² ¦;'ž 'Ëj " æº p~j ©b‚ 6B . ¦;'ž Î"º 2003j 10ú 31¢ ?f Æ Jö KCG-2öB ‚ ž>{2êþöB .¾>î . šr KCG-2öB ï~ z²ï [6Æ& ÆÂ>î , ›¢ ‚ KCG-1 ~ Òê &>W þ ÆÂB æ~>~ bê .~ '.ïöB ÿf z²ï Úæ z ²ïb‚ æ‚ ©b‚ Ú j KCG-2~ ž>{2 ê · Öb Қö BB [ö 7ÒB 6Æ& &J KCG-1~ &¢ öïB ¾æÂ *çb‚ šCB . KCG-1 ¶Ú~ ž>{2ê‚ b{>vº ² 6² ‚ çšæò, ÖÂïöº KCG-2~ ž>{2ê& ’² 'Ëj ‚ ©b‚ º;B . Table 7öB r > ®º :f ?š KCG-1~ Ò*ÁÒê &>Wþ Ö" j·>ïf 1.22 m d öB 0.69‚ 43.4%¾ 6²~&, R>ïê>ê 0.7 m d öB 0.14 m d ‚ 79.6%& 6² ~& . š‚ Î~ ÖÂï 6²º ö çw† ;ê ~ &>[~ æz& *B>Ú¢ ~º– [6Æ~ öï òš  çj J«š * > ® . š *çf ËV*ö ž‚ Žû(Surging) ~ ÖbÓ ²‚ šÿB [6Æ¢ aÚê" ÿö ç¦~ ¶Fš &>[öB 2êB îj Û~ b{&>[ ~¦ö bš Ï*>Ú ¶Fš &>[~ çö ê~² >š, š Öb~ ÖÂïf ç® BFF ©b‚ 6B . š-² š ËV'ž &6öBº [6Æ~ šÿö ~‚ Vš~ öïê ¦;' Î"¢ " >º ì º Қš . ò, ËK ®º *^&ö ~‚ '.‚ ;^& Ò& &šš F ©š .. 0.7. 3 −1. 3 −1. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003. 79.6. 7.. KCG-1. 3 −1. 0.14. j. Ö †. ‚“öB ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ÖÂï Ã& º &Ë~– 3;'š . ò, æî 5 æÚ’–ö V¢ B Ëj 5 2êV»~ F" 'ÏöB ?NB VFš jº† öš . šö V¢ ÖÂïö Ã&;êê ç‚ º*ræº – .š &ˆ ©b‚ º;B . ò, š VFf Öb" " æ~ &>[~ bÒ' VËj ËçÒ > ®j öš–, ËV*ö ž‚ b~ /ËKj ~º ©f j 6j ª«® ž~¢ † ©š . &¦ª~ &Ö Öbf Öbš¾ ž" &>[~ bÒ ' VË~ &~ö ~š ÖÂïš 'ÚæV  º Öb‚ bj æ³'b‚ /š "º ³¦‚ />ö(source)š ì V r^ö ÖÂïš 7¶V 6²>º ãÖ& ôš B~  ®º ©š .. B‚  Öb~ BB ÖÂïš ¸² ï&B Öb š &ÿ ê âî æ¾æ pjB ÖÂïš &6>Ú ¦ j к ©f Öb~ V˚ Ôj^B¢V  º &>[ ö &~B bš "¯j>‚ ¦—~² >Ú B>º ãÖ & z z® B~ ®V r^š–, š rº '; j> ïj ."~æ pêƒ Öbj &Ò~º ©š 7º~– " ¯j>º .Vš¢ F ©š . V¢B Zí 7º‚ ©f  Öb~ BB æ~ > &~ïš ³¦‚ ö "7~ BBƃ F~~¢ † ©š .. 6Ò~ &  ’º 21^V *†Ú ’BB Òëž >¶ö~ æ³' {VF BB~ ’j æö("B®^ 3-4-1)ö ~š >¯>îÛî . šö 6Òãî .. ^^ò æ~>–Ò, šJvÛ¦/‚“>¶öÒ(2001). *šç>ê Ú'Á&Ò BF&k, ~㦠ç~>ê“(2002. 3) B¶ò. 3. æ~>–Ò, šJvÛ¦/‚“>¶öÒ(2000). 1. 2..

(12) ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&(II). ‚;ç , ž>{2ê Ãþ 5 æ~>‚Ï æOç> ê &ÒBFOn ’, "VF¦, B*¶ò. 5. ‚;ç , ž>{2êV»ö ~‚ æ~> ·>ï Ã&, ‚ “æ~>Æ·~ã², 7(2), (2002). 4.. 6. ASTM, D4645-87 (Reapproved 1997) Standard Test Method of Determination of the In-Situ Stress in Rock Using the Hydraulic Fracturing Method1 (1987). 7. , , , 15(4), (1999). 8. ( ), ( ) , TB-11(5 ) TB-16(5 ) (2000). 9. ( ), 3 , (4 ) (4 ) (2000). 10. ( ), (2 ) (5 )(2001). 11. , 3 ( ) , TH-4(3 ), TH-7(4 )(2000). 12. ( ) , 3 ( ) (5 )(2000). 13. ( ) , (8 )(1990). 14. ( ) , , 7 , 3 (4 ) 1 (3 ) (1999). 15. , ( ) ,2 ( ): (7 )(1998). 16. , ( ) ( 10 ). ‚Wë  F~j»Væ Jê¢ *‚ &ê ãÒöB~ >{2ê .VwKšC ‚“æ>² ¢^÷ &âÖë " 7F {² ·>* F*Æ šJÒ æ> –Ò B :V6 š 5 :V6 š &âÖë " Ó" ç"* ³ê‚ šJÒ B ’ Æî –ÒB z§V6 š 5 šÂV6 š &֚J " WÎ Ë^ö* ê‚BJ ’ šJÒ æ >–ÒB š âWbÖ Öž ç§* B ’ ËÿV6 “ê{ËÒ Æ î–ÒB š š " &Ö Öž ç§* B ’ ËÿV6 “ê{ËÒ Æ î–ÒB š " &Ö 'ÿF ÿWÖ êêÖ ÆêšJ šJÒ æ>– ÒB š " &Ö FJê ã¾F F*Æ ’ šJÒ æ >B W· V6 š 5;2 V6 š «Á’ ‚“ê‚Ò Bޞ#B~³ê‚ ãB êö’* š JÒ Jê Æî–ÒB ’ ˋ ^ö ÒN Ö V6’* š ‚“ê‚Ò *> Ž· ›Ö Ë> * ³ê‚ B ’. 85. šJÒ æ>–ÒB(5š) (2000). ‚“ê‚Ò, *>-Ž·* ³ê‚(B10’) šJÒ (ÂÂ-Ëê) æ>–ÒB(2š) (2000). 18. ‚“ê‚Ò, *"-Ž·(›Ö-Ë>)* ³ê‚(B3’) šJÒ æ>–ÒB(2š) (2000). 19. ‚“>¶öÒ, ‚ê;6 6 5 ¦&JÒ æî–Ò B(7š)(2002). 20. *&šJ("), Ó"-ç"* ³ê‚ šJÒ B3’ Æî –ÒB, TB-10(4š) 5 TB-20(4š)(2000). 21. *&šJ("), âVF, §-·’(>žÒ’*) “êBï šJÒ T/K JêÏ Æî–ÒB, >žV6 «Á ’(10š), ëêV6 «Á’(5š)(1999). 22. *&šJ, *&úæîÚç("), æ~Æ 9-12’ šJÒ æ>æî–ÒB(9š)(2001). 23. *&ÖëBB("), (")šzúæîÚç, ·’s(ëêÒ ’*) æÚ “êBï šJÒ Æî–ÒB, ëê 3(3š), 4V 6(7š)’*(2000). 24. *&ÖëBB("), 7F({²-·>*) F*Æ šJÒ æ>–ÒB, :V6(4š) (2000). 17.. 25. Heim, Underground Excavation in Rocks, Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, London, pp. 97, (1980). 26. Heok. E. and Brown E., T., Underground Excauvations in Rocks, Institute of mining and Metallurgy, London. pp. 9899 (1980). 27. , , (2002). 28. Driscoll, P.G., Groundwater and Wells (2nd Ed.) (1986). 29. , , (1982).. f>; ‚“~ æîö '‚ Jê;> êÂö &‚ ’ ;Ò* ¢^ ‚;ç æ~> B† ;'Ò. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 74~85, 2003.

(13)

참조

관련 문서

In this study, the variation of indoor and soil radon concentrations were measured at a test bed (detached house), and correlation analysis was performed using linear regression..

Maximum actually measured earth pressure was 7.4 ton/m 2 and showed similar value to maximum value of empirical earth pressure of 7.0~7.6ton/m 2 and from this we can see that