The Effect of Grouping by Extraversion and Introversion in POE Learning Applied to Elementary School Science Class POE
7
0
0
전체 글
(2) POE *
(3) (2002. 6. 24
(4) ). †. †. †. The Effect of Grouping by Extraversion and Introversion in POE Learning Applied to Elementary School Science Class Hanjoong Koh *, Kyungoh Tak, Sohyun Moon, Jaeyoung Han†, and Taehee Noh† Department of Science Education, Chonju National University of Education, Chonju 560-757, Korea † Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-748, Korea (Received June 24, 2002). .
(5) POE ! "# $%& ! '( !)*, +, -.,
(6) /* 01 23456. 57 9589 :; %& <= %&>? @A B, C DE 4F 9GH IJ
(7) 456. <= %& IK %&L 48 M 489 1N $%&>?, K %&L 28 289 1N $%&> ? !456. O PQR ST U, !)* VW IK %& X
(8) Y :; %&Z6 [\6. ]^* K %& :; %& 3 _ ` G Y ab6.
(9) /*
(10) cAd ! 3 efg 'Y hij6. : POE , !, $%& ! kl ABSTRACT. In this study, the effects of grouping by extraversion and introversion in POE learning applied to elementary science class on students’ achievement, the perception of learning environment and the attitude toward science instruction were investigated. Ninety-five 5th graders were assigned to the control group and the experimental groups, and taught about acid and base for 9 class hours. In the experimental groups, the homogeneous small group was composed of four introverts or four extroverts, and the heterogeneous small group was composed of two introverts and two extroverts. Two-way ANCOVA results revealed that the homogeneous group performed better than the control group in the application subtest of the achievement test. Significant difference in learning difficulty was found between the heterogeneous group and the control group. In the attitude toward science class, significant interaction effect was found between the instruction and the extraversion/introversion. Key words: POE Learning, Extraversion and Introversion, Grouping Method. mn Hop ;7G qL rs ,=9 :4F te 3u. v`d rw9 Yxy, Ez N{9 |4}, ~ kl9 4F # r9 Yx 4 ( y a6. M rs, <= ~ I 9
(11) kl>? ‘Y L -O S& 1. 72.
(12)
(13) POE . ’9 4y, S& H ef 4 4 F ~ ef !9 -.4 9 y4y a6. 3 ! rX* N- - IZ6 3 3 ( : !9 24y a6. c $%& 2 x , F¡ Yx ¢£ 9 Jy a t x¤¥x <'!a $%& ¦ox § 456. "¨, q ' ©V9 | t $%& ©V ª - x« y a6. $%& ©V ¬/? I h ® ¯ ;J, ° ~ I 2p
(14) ±¬ p6. ¡ ²³ h´? `( !4y µ2>? 3y4 *¶ _*4 POE(Prediction-Observation-Explanation) ±¬ 9 ~d ® w
(15) ·>? $% &
(16) a6. POE ¸0-rs-¹8 3 &º?, »¼ e½ ¾ te U( ¸04 4y, rs 9 ¿ B, ¸0 rs 3 À9 |U4 ¹8 ( ¦o4
(17) ±¬ 6. POE Á qL N{ Q
(18) ±¬ h ÂN{ 23 b>h, ÃÄ¥x <= h ~ I POE( ª>? Å Æ6. Ç, 'È- $%& É Ê efg ËhÌ 6. Í, L $%& IÎd 3$: q9 :4F 9 |4 Åh kl9 ÏÃYy `( !4 E( Yx}, IÎ Á9 ÐY4y, à Ñ( P_
(19) a6. ¡ efgL $%& !O °! "¨ 6Ò hiÓ
(20) a>Ô?, %& ! kl "# ' 4F Y ¦ob6. ¡h ;¥x $%& ! r ÕS ! h !)* -x 01 Ö× 2. 3. 4,5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 73. >}, ! Ø-x 01 "# Ù efg h $%& ! Úx Û6. $%& I q efg Ü*Y ? 6Ò}, y ,Ý ' q VW G ? hijÞ U ( y¢ ß, ! "# $%& ! '( 23 àY a6. "¨ 57
(21) ! "¨ IK á K- $ %&9 !4y, POE Eâ
(22) 9 <H456. ¡
(23) cA '( !)*, +, -.,
(24) /* 01 234y, :
(25) 9 <H :; %& Ø456. 10,11. 11,12. 13. . H A 1N 57 9589 e>? <H456. 3 !)*
(26) _3 3N 9 Âq4F :; %& 1 <= %& 2>? @A456. <= %& 48 M 489 1N $%& >? ! ! IK %&, 28 28>? 1N $%&9 ! ! K %&9 !456. 2N <= %& IK %& K %&9 ã @A4F " # °!9 :;456. 3 !)*h ! "# ' ( :;4E 4F $%& 3 !)* e 4
(27) ä F ! åyÖ æç*¶ !456. ! è3 X
(28) Ðé E4F 9 !>? S U Á %&? Table 1 ê6. . 57 ‘C D E’ &O9 ST4F POE ±¬ "# 9GH S R
(29) Î( NÊ456.
(30) cA ! è3d +, -. á
(31). Table 1. Subjects of three groups by the personality Control group. Experimental groups Homogeneous group. Heterogeneous group. Total. Introvert Extrovert. 22 13. 16 16. 14 14. 52 43. Total. 35. 32. 28. 95. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 1.
(32) 74. . /* è3( <H456. :; %& 3 :
(33) 9 <H45y, <= %& - ! IK %& K %& POE E â
(34) 9 <H456.
(35) cAY ëì B ! )*, +, -.,
(36) /* è3( <H456.
(37) . <= %&
(38) L POE Eâ 5& º
(39) ±¬>? ¦ob6. Ý ‘¸0’ &º te U( ¸04y _( E¶4 4F Á9 í4 456. ‘rs’ &º Ä <=4y rs 9 E¶4*¶ 45>}, ‘¹8’ &º ¸0 rs 3 À9 |U
(40) a*¶ 2 ( <H456. B, ‘î!’ & º @© rïp w <=9 3Y Hð> ? Z Åh Zñ Î( ;H4F Á9 î2 45y, ‘qò’ &º 9 qò|b6.
(41) &º "¨ NÊ I x( ó HÉ 2? 1Nô ;P45>}, Ix( g ! ß <= U 9 E¶4EZ6 _( E¿4 y 9 ¹84 X9 *¶ 2456. :; %&
(42) L *õ-N-qò 3&º
(43) ± ¬>? ¦ob6. ‘*õ’ &º ö; ÷B,
(44) r â- 9 J 456. ‘N’ & º 2 <= á N- rs I9 <H45 >}, <= U( <= rs N>? 45 6. ‘qò’ &º <= U( N>? ÊH øy, 3 * ù qò?
(45) 9 úãò456. 2 L <= ,Ý <H45>}, ,Ý 3 !)
(46) ! "¨ K2Ç!9 456. . ! è3x Goldberg ! è3x ! VW |û4 20öü9 ýW 4F 3456. þÿ*(Cronbach α) 0.80 b6. !)* è3x Bloom O S "¨ x. VW 8öü, | VW 6öü, VW 6öü r. 20öü>? NÊ456. N Ê è3x öY 4- 3 3 - J1iû*( è \>}, þÿ* (Cronbach α) 0.76 b6. +, -. è3? Fraserd Fisher Y NÊ $z ‘My Class Inventory’ ]^ * VW9 Á 5öüô 3456. Cronbach α? 14. 15. è3x þÿ* 3 è3 0.78, 0.42, 3 B è3 0.63, 0.48 b6. ]^* VW ,Ý þ ÿ* 0.58? Zy}, ,Ý 0.540.56 b6.
(47) /* è3 Fraser ‘Test of Science Related Attitudes’
(48) Å£ )` rw VW9 Á 10öüô 3456. è3x þÿ* 3 è3 0.90, 0.855>}, 3B è3 0.91, 0.88 b6. . Q-L !)*, +, -.,
(49) /* è3 X
(50) 6. Á Q- 4F
(51) Yx
(52) cA ' á ! "# efg9 ZE | 32 - kJ O PQR ST(two-way ANCOVA) 9 <H456. PQ->? !)* è3 ,Ý
(53) cA <Hp * ÐY X
(54) (Ðé 80.8) (, +, -.
(55) /* X
(56) ÁÁ 3 è3 X
(57) ( 3456. PQ-. Q- 3 ± _ ` er(p<0.01) ab 6. :ºST SPSSd SAS :º øx( 3456. 15. 16. 17. . :; %&, POE( IK á K %& !)* è3 U Table 2d ê6. !)* è3 ª X
(58) IK %&(13.98) K %&(12.55) h :; %&(12.06) Z6 [\>h,
(59) cA 'h efg ' hihx Û\6(Table 3). !)* è3 4VW? ST U, x. | VW '(x.: MS=1.39, F=0.62, p= 0.539, |: MS=1.61, F=1.00, p=0.370) á efg '(x.: MS=2.04, F=0.91, p=0.405, |: MS=0.02, F=0.02, p=0.985)Y Æb>h, VW ' Y hij6(Table 3). 3B è(Tukey-Kramer) U IK %&(3.91) :; %&(2.78) Ø| _ `4 [\6(p<0.05). Í, IK- $%& ! +, ¦ op POE Eâ
(60) L ª !)*( [ x §45x e>? y
(61) 3y( 4 VW :-
(62) Ø4F ' b6. ¡ U POE &º ® Ã ¨ î! &º <= h < ö; ® q9 : $%& efg Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.
(63)
(64) POE . 75. Table 2. Means, standard deviations, and adjusted means of the achievement test scores Traditional group. Total (20) Introvert Extrovert. Knowledge (8) Introvert Extrovert. Understanding (6) Introvert Extrovert. Application (6) Introvert Extrovert. Homogeneous group. Heterogeneous group. M. SD. Adj. M. M. SD. Adj. M. M. SD. Adj. M. 12.29 12.27 12.31. 3.65 3.30 4.33. 12.06 11.99 12.13. 13.88 13.75 14.00. 4.12 3.66 4.66. 13.98 13.87 14.09. 12.43 12.14 12.71. 3.45 3.39 3.63. 12.55 11.59 13.51. 5.57 5.68 5.39. 1.70 1.36 2.22. 5.48 5.57 5.31. 5.81 6.00 5.63. 1.77 1.37 2.13. 5.85 6.05 5.66. 5.54 5.50 5.71. 1.40 1.40 1.45. 5.58 5.29 5.88. 3.86 3.77 4.00. 1.40 1.41 1.41. 3.80 3.70 3.95. 4.19 4.06 4.31. 1.36 1.44 1.30. 4.22 4.09 4.34. 3.79 3.79 3.79. 1.23 1.31 1.19. 3.82 3.64 3.99. 2.86 2.82 2.92. 1.56 1.62 1.50. 2.78 2.72 2.86. 3.88 3.69 4.06. 1.83 1.78 1.91. 3.91 3.73 4.09. 3.11 2.86 3.36. 1.60 1.51 1.69. 3.15 2.66 3.64. Table 3. ANCOVA results on the achievement test scores. SS. df. MS. F. p. Total Treatment Personality Treatment×Personality. 63.50 13.02 14.45. 2 1 2. 31.75 13.02 7.23. 2.87 1.18 0.65. 0.062 0.281 0.523. Application Treatment Personality Treatment×Personality. 5.50 2.68. 21.01. 2 1 2. 5.50 1.34. 10.50. 4.37 2.29 0.56. 0.015 0.134 0.575. p<0.05.. e *£9 >? |T
(65) a6. M, U ¸0 rs á ® q æçp N {Q
(66) ±¬9 459 ß, VW <= %& X
(67) Y :
(68) %&Z6 [L , 9 Z- _346. ¡h, K %& :; %& 3 G Y ÆbÞ XL $%& !O 3 efg h UY 2O -! ! "¨ ¨K Y! 9 H36. !" # $% . :; %&, POE( IK á K %& +, -. è3 U( Table 4 ;H456. +, -. è3 VW
(69) cA 'h efg ± _ `4x Û\>h, ]^* V W
(70) cA 'Y hij6(Table 5). 3 6. 13. B è U K %&(13.39) :; %&(11.56) 3 _ ` G Y ab6(p<0.05). Í,
(71) 01 <= %&É G Y Æb>h, POE( K %& :
(72) 9 L Ø|
(73) 6y -.4y ab6. ]^* è3 þÿ*Y 6$ >Ô? U Ë â ;X a9
(74) a6. 5&º? ! POE Eâ
(75) :
(76) Ø| q 4y þ N{9 í4Åh À |U9 | ( 4 - FY p6. ¡ w
(77) 3 * :
(78) Z6 6$ ¢£9
(79) a>h, Ç>? w I9 2 I :
(80) ]^*
(81) 1).
(82) .. 1). 2003, Vol. 47, No. 1.
(83) . 76. Table 4. Means, standard deviations, and adjusted means of the perception of learning environment test scores Traditional group. Satisfaction (25) Introvert Extrovert. Difficulty (25) Introvert Extrovert. Homogeneous group. Heterogeneous group. M. SD. Adj. M. M. SD. Adj. M. M. SD. Adj. M. 19.06 18.18 20.54. 3.10 3.14 2.47. 17.35 16.73 18.68. 16.03 15.75 16.31. 3.05 3.62 2.44. 17.00 16.69 17.25. 16.18 17.07 15.29. 3.58 3.13 3.89. 16.92 17.41 16.39. 11.11 11.59 10.31. 2.83 2.58 3.15. 11.56 11.84 11.02. 12.50 12.88 12.13. 3.15 2.25 3.90. 12.10 12.12 12.05. 13.43 13.29 13.57. 2.94 3.43 2.47. 13.39 13.54 13.20. Table 5. ANCOVA results on the perception of learning environment test scores SS. df. MS. F. p. Satisfaction Treatment Personality Treatment × Personality. 8.08 5.65 32.65. 2 1 2. 4.04 5.65 16.32. 0.54 0.76 2.19. 0.584 0.386 0.118. Difficulty Treatment Personality Treatment × Personality. 56.94 3.89 2.30. 2 1 2. 28.47 3.89 1.15. 3.84 0.52 0.16. 0.025* 0.471 0.856. *. p<0.05.. _3 Þ X 9 y¢41, I9 24 E z- 9 _x41 &º( É$ H! à! a6. M, "Fa K %&
(84) +,9 Y #$ XL ? 6# ! 9 Y¦ IÎd efg4 IK %& Ø| %x Û&9 '| }, $%& ? ( oI9 _Ê4F ¢£9 $H!
(85) a*¶ POE Eâ
(86) I $()Y?*õ4kJ* y¢
(87) a6.
(88) # & .
(89) ţ )` rw>? 23
(90) /* è3 U( Table 6 ;H456. 18. 19. 18.
(91) ţ VW
(92) cA ' Æ b>h efg 'Y _ `456(Table 7). ,Ý K %&(39.59), IK %&(37.86), :; %&(37.68) * by, ,Ý :; %& (40.89) Y [\y, IK %&(36.34), K %& (34.49) *>? [\6. ¡h !
(93) ? & * è9 <H U, :º>? _ ` G Y Æb6( !: MS=19.01, F=0.81, p=0.449, !: MS=148.47, F=2.93, p=0.065).. ,Ý :; %&
(94) Y + 6y #$ , hij, K %& ]^* -. [\y, 6$ \Þ. Table 6. Means, standard deviations, and adjusted means of the attitude toward science instruction test scores Traditional group. Enjoyment of science lessons (50) Introvert Extrovert. Leisure interest in science (50) Introvert Extrovert. Homogeneous group. Heterogeneous group. M. SD. Adj.M. M. SD. Adj.M. M. SD. Adj.M. 40.54 38.59 43.85. .29 7.81 5.01. 38.81 37.68 40.89. 36.00 35.06 36.94. 8.87 7.10 10.49. 37.01 37.86 36.34. 36.21 38.07 34.36. 8.66 6.86 10.06. 36.94 39.59 34.49. 38.09 36.55 40.69. 7.30 7.92 5.44. 36.17 35.23 38.04. 34.41 32.06 36.75. 9.23 7.64 10.29. 36.18 35.71 36.67. 35.07 37.50 32.64. 8.40 5.64 10.10. 35.21 37.08 33.45. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.
(95)
(96) POE . 77. Table 7. ANCOVA results on the attitude toward science instruction test scores. Enjoyment of science lessons Treatment Personality Treatment × Personality Leisure interest in science Treatment Personality Treatment × Personality. SS. df. MS. F. p. 97.16 28.65 265.230. 2 1 2. 48.58 28.65 132.610. 1.38 0.81 3.75. 0.258 0.370 00.027*. 28.76. 2 1 2. 0.49 0.00 2.76. 0.611 0.965 0.069. 0.06. 160.67 0. 14.38 0.06. 80.34. *p<0.05. ˲e:6. ¡h y9 e>?  o hiì $%& I -.L z d eâÔ?, $%& ! k. I ,e h U `A V 4F -9 y¢º - Y à46. Ç, )` rw VW
(97) 'h, efg ' ± _ `4x Û\6(Table 7). )`? òE¥x # q* EÉ à4Ô? &EÉ Ö¦
(98) cA
(99) Ëe )` V 9 `Ax § >? Áp6. 13. ! 01 IK - $%& K- $%&9 !4y, 57 ‘C DE’ &O | POE Eâ
(100) 9 <H456. ¡
(101) '( !)*, +, -.,
(102) /* 01 :
(103) Ø456. U $%& I E POE Eâ
(104) L ª !)*( [ x §45>h, [ L
(105) 3y( 4 VW IK- $ %& +, POE Eâ
(106) 9 ¦o459 ß :
(107) Ø4F ' b6. Í, POE Eâ
(108) ±¬ 3 2 ® á ¹8 q 9 eH!
(109) a>}, $ò M $ò $%&9 !459 ß $%& efg Ê ËÓ Y!9 H36. POE Eâ
(110)
(111) `A V L G Y Æb6. ¡h
(112) ¢£ 2003, Vol. 47, No. 1. r ‘]^*’ VW K %& :; %& Z6
(113) 9 6y #$y ab6. ¡ U !)* K %& ,Ý :; %& G Y hihx ÛL X ˲e:6. Í, ! 01 K>? !p $%& É efg %x Û9
(114) a>Ô? ® I 2 $%&9 ! ß ! 01 IK- $%&>? !4 .Ä 6.
(115) /* ţ VW
(116) c Ad ! "# efg 'Y ab, L K %&
(117) 9, L :; %&
(118) 9 +6y #$ , hij6. $%& !O -! Sæ "¨ efg ,e e 4y, U
(119) Å £ ? 6Ò hiÓ Y!9 H36. ¡h ! "# $%& ! k. q VW `A 'Y Âo d e 4 hi ì X 6# 7 h ;( e>? º - Y à4}, M q9 1/ ST4F $%& efg q VW `A V 9 ª>? 0 àY a6. M, POE Eâ Å£ y
(120) 6y -. X9 y¢4F, 5&º? S
(121) I9
(122) 1 É· 4Åh ª- I x«9 ;P4 k J9 Á| 0
(123) a6. Í, POE( $%& 9 'È>?
(124) o4E | x - efg ,= h ® +,9 2!| }, L 2I E¿ 3 E¿ Õ
(125) a>Ô? ( eH!
(126) a kJ* y¢ àY a6. 13. 20.
(127) . 78. 20027* Ø x O 4F
(128) ob&.. 1.. ! ; " # $%&: #',. 1997. 2. Ann, C.; & Howe, C. Science Education 1996, 80, 35. 3. , 1997 , 1998. 2000, 27, 41. 4. ; 5. White, R.; Gunstone, R. Probing understanding, The Falmer Press: London, 1992. 6. ; ; ; , 1999, 43, 110. 7. , , 1991. 8. Howe, C. J.; Rodgers, C.; Tolmie, A. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1990, 5, 59. 9. Meyer, K.; Woodruff, E. Science Education, 1997, 81, 173.. () +, -.# /0 12
(129) . *. 345 675 859 :;<
(130) =>? ! " #$% &
(131) #'"@ A@ BCD. 10.. 345; A ; 859; EFG ',. 1998, 18, 61. 11. Webb, N. M. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 74, 475. 12. Webb, N. M. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 74, 642. 13. ; ; ; ; , 2000, 20, 43. 14. Goldberg, L. R. In. Personality Psychology in Europe; Mervielde, I.; Deary, I. J.; De Fruyt, F.; Ostendorf, F., Eds.; Tilburg University Press: Tilburg, The Netherlands, 1999; Vol. 7, p. 7. Available: http://ipip.ori.org. 15. Fraser, B. J.; Fisher, D. L. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1986, 23(5), 387. 16. ; , 1999, 19, 229. 17. Fraser, B. J. Test of science related attitudes: Handbook, The Australian Council for Educational Research: Hawthorn, 1981. 18. ; ; , 1998, 25, 56. 19. ; ; ; , 1998, 25, 118. 20. ; ; , 2001, 45, 76.. 345 H2 #IG 17D EFG ' . 345 JG '. 345 A 859
(132) AKL :M :;< 345
(133) 345 85 :;<
(134) . Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.
(135)
관련 문서
This study tried to find out the effect of physical expression activity in the childlcare classroom influencing to the aggressions and the adjusting to school of the
The Relationships between Elementary School Students' Expectancy-Value Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Intention for Class Participation in Expressive Activity..
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of 12 weeks after school physical activity program on body composition and PAPS in obese elementary
The purpose of this study is to analyze the interest and self-confidence of middle school students in learning English grammar and to examine the
The Effects of Culture Learning Through American TV Dramas on English Listening, Vocabulary Skills and Interest of Korean Elementary
This study examined the achievement, satisfaction and interest of an English grammar class based on flipped learning in order to find out the effect of
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of peer-mentoring on the achievement and learning attitudes of middle school students toward
The purpose of this study is to investigate the middle school students' motivation, self-confidence and attitude toward English learning in a team-teaching
