High School Students’ Problem-Solving Strategy-Performing AbilityMeasured by an Essay-Type Test

전체 글

(1)Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2001, Vol. 45, No. 4 Printed in the Republic of Korea.

(2) * †. .

(3) (2001. 2. 28 ) †. High School Students’ Problem-Solving Strategy-Performing Ability Measured by an Essay-Type Test Kyungmoon Jeon, Choong Hee Ahn†, and Taehee Noh* Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea † Kwangsin High School, Seoul 151-020, Korea (Received February 28, 2001). . ! "# $% & '() *+ , , -. ( $% & '( /0 123. 4 567 8 49(N=187) ) :+7 ;, $% & '( < ,-. ( =423. $% & '( >?@A 7B C D- ! 1E FG, /H IJ KL, C MN O+, P-Q RS, -. &, ,-. $B, T-U V23. >? 7

(4) WS XYZ[ \]S .92U ^_23. # , ` 1E FG '(. -. & '(A a. bcd, C MN O+ '( T '(A e17 fcU 1gh3. $% & '( $i ? j C Dk ? ,-. ( Rl7 L/) dmnh3. ABSTRACT. In this study, high school students’ problem-solving strategy-performing ability was measured by an essay-type test. The relationship between students’ logical thinking ability and strategy-performing ability was also investigated. Four classes (N=187) were selected from two high schools in Seoul, and the strategy performance ability test and the Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT) were administered. Evaluation scheme for strategy-performing ability consists of 7 subcategories - understanding given of problems, recalling related law, setting up subgoals, deriving physical quantities, logical progress, mathematical execution, and reviewing. The intercoder agreement for scaling was .92, which indicated substantial strength of agreement. The results revealed that students’ ability of understanding given of problems and mathematical execution was relatively high. However, their ability of setting up subgoals and reviewing was very low. The total scores of the strategy performance ability test and all of the scores of each subcategory were significantly correlated with the GALT scores.. $o.cU ! "#(A pq7 MN U [Dgr sct, u- dv ! 7w . +S x1 y3. z{d À | }~ +Q._ `) 7 ;, ! 1. !4 _` 8 ) 0.cU v y3. {7 ! "#() L4 C7 - I` ! " # $%(), XZ NL(molecular representation), , "#ZZ (paired think-aloud problem solving), aR 3 ! 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 370. 7.

(5)

(6) . gr s3. a" U~ ¡ " z ¢qVA £ ! gr scd ¤¥¦§ z ü .ct, ©ª ! "#( ¡ S «X ¬/ - ! "# 7 V « * ®r§ y3. ¯v ! "# V «°± ¤²v + C '(`S ³ ¡ ´ y mµ7 ) ¶´ ¢q¡ y3. ! "# + '( ¡~·, ¸ ! "# $% & '() ¡ · 70¹ ;«º B _ +) 1 C" gr » V I(think-aloud method) ) ´ y) f3. z{d I ¼A 4[ qg½U ¡ L ¡ !73 ? y3. ¯v mµS ¾3 ¿À._ qgt, \ÁU §¢ ` y3. ÂÃ P- XÄ lÅ5m Huffman NL Æ j ÇVS, NL 0V, 1¥._ $B, -. & * $% & '() ¡´ y È) B7 É y3. < ÊA 5 ) LcU Ë&gr » V I 7 #. ` ) \Ì · ´ °± ¤²v, ÂÃ ` r $Í.cU SÎ & ¡(performance assessment) Ï7 Ë&S =Æ._ SÐ) !´ fcU 3. ¯v L j n ÑÒ) ^, Ó Ó ÔÕA È >?@ B) Ë&´ ¢q¡ y3. 7Ö, z ¼A Z` ` ,-. (. ×7 /HV) ¾ 23. ! "# "S a. \/ # ¾ 2 cd «X ¬/ ! V « Ø?) 8hc½U, ! "# $% & '( , -. ( /0S 1" ¾¤Ä 73. < ÊA ¢qV Ù n ÑÒ B, ` ! "# $% & '() *+ , ,-. ( $% & '( /0 1 Z 73. i._ MN 3Ú Ê3. 1. n ÑÒ ! "# $% & '() ¡ C7 j 7 >?@) B73. 2. B7 S ` $% & '() C DkU *+73. 3. $% & '( ,-. ( /0 1 73. 8. 9,10. 11. 12. 13. 11. 371.

(7) . 4 y 2B §Ò _ 0 7 Û NÜ7 ;, Ó 2¹ Z 0Ý 29Û NÜ23. L A Þ 187ßh3. . L i Là + , ! "#´ á +) ¡9. Zâ .Sã B23. ` ! "# + $%) ¡ C7 f ½U ‘ ! "# $% & '( ’U ßß23 (Fig. 1). $o._ ¡ È ! "# g +¾±) !4 DU ä§å ª "Ä ´ f) ß4t \L /HV) kU æ§ çèé · Ì", $% & '( ê¢q 7 +¾¡ gSã "Ä ´ f) ß4§ çct \L._ Lë) O+23. >?@A V I) 7 , /7 , z- Z 2_[ , TU B23(Table 1). ‘1E FG’A !4 { ¡§ +¾` ¡~· ! "#) C" ¢q7 1E) :k '(3. ¢q7 1E) ! ". + l- ãÙd, ì + ?. 9,13,18. 19. 14,15. 16,17. 2001, Vol. 45, No. 4. Fig. 1..

(8) ..

(9) 372. !".

(10) 1. ! 2" #$ ! 1"% &' 2. () *+ ,$ *+ ,$ -. /0 123 ()4 56 *+ ,$ 786 *+ ,$9, 123 ()4 56 *+. : ,$ 786 *+; ,$ 3. < => ?@ < => ?@ -. /0 A4 < =>% ?@ BC < =>% 8DE ?@ &F < =>% 8DE ?@ 4. GHI J. GHI J.% -. /0 CKL GHI M BC GHI 8DE M &F GHI 8DE M 5. HK HK # N0 HK -.5 !.O P1 A4 HK Q 1" #$ RS9 T% 2, #$ 9UV 786 HK S9 T% 1, #W 9UV 6. XHK " HK Y Z( [ .\ HK O ]S [ .\9 ^_XH # C` ^_XH # ab HK O ]S [ .\9, -cde a0 ^_XH # ab HK O ]S [ .\ 7. f f% /0 f% -.9 g Ch @ Y@ ! A4 Ch BC 8DE @ ij A4 Ch# Nk lm, 1e n*oW 8DE f A4 Ch @p 786 q M ij A4 Ch# Nk lm, 2" #$ n*oW 8DE f r Table 1.. «2·, 3?A í 1E) FG7 u 0?A dS FG§ î7 u3. ‘/H IJ KL’A 1E "Ä ´ f /0 æ .ï7 IJ) KL"n '(3. IJ ðd ) KLÙd, ñî ghrS Î7 ]¡ .ï7 u òÉó IJ) KL7 f. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 21. cU [D23. ‘C MN O+’A P-Q) RS $ rô P-Q) RS´§ l- O+ '( , ‘P-Q RS’ Bõd IJ) . .ï7 P-Q) "n '(3. 8 D "µ í P-Q` " Éö &7 u ÓÓ 3 ? ±?) Dh3. ‘-. &’A òÉó -. § Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(11)

(12) . ) §² = ÷ & '(3. -. § * dvS ñî «X yc ø? 2cd, 0ù =d ñî úû . = A 2K L«º ø?23. ‘,-. $B’ ,-. \/ g #ü) Sý´ y '(3. aÁ,- '( y -. & ÃÙ7 #ü) Sý7 u 3?), -. & þ/7 #ü) Sý7 u 0?) Dh3. ä§åcU ‘T’ ì + j ÿ l ? '(3. -. & ÃÙ7 #ü Sý ; +) T +cU [D2·, "# + òÉó u< ñî u X >?23. "# + ñî u T " \« + 2?, 8 + Éó ÿ ) 3?) Dh3. "# + òÉó u 0ù + T , ÿ l Ó"¾ , X Z cU zæ¾ , 3ó IcU "#" ¾ I` ¡~· 7¡§ IcU T 2?, 8¡ § L IcU T 3?) Dh3. < Ê 7B C D ? 8 3?ÛcU ! " # $% & '( ±?A 21?h3. ,-. (A 5 GALT(Group Assessment of Logical Thinking) U *+23. 6B C ,--¾ ,-, aÁ ,-, _o! ,-, ^ , -, L/ ,-, 1 ,-- Þ 12 ÈcU V gr y3. üÉ αU 7 n.

(13) WS :& .65U ¾ gh , .63h3. . ! "# $% & '( B C e /7 :& ` ) T23. TU a È`) ! 7 ;,

(14) Î 2ß) LcU 1w a =4c U 2 È) B23. 2 È " $ ¡ 3_cU«º mµS

(15) A ;, i Ï) 7 2¹ 49ß) LcU 20. 21. 12,19. 373. 2w a =423. # XY ` $% «¡ ¾3 ñ {d 1 È) : +7 ;, Â +¾Ç23. LcU 2¹ 187ß) :+7 ;, e ,-. ( =423. ! "# $ % & '( =4´ á ¡ ‘ ! "#. /H Ód f) 8 .c4.’, ‘3¡ @ f) §u§ ä4.’ ! 8 !4 §) [ Oß23. 9 j $ V ) æ" :+7 ÿ§ 12 BÛ " XYZ 2_ >?) ,. +) ÌcU , $% & '( >?@ (Table 1)) B23. ÊA IcU :+7 12B ÿ§ " XYZ[ \]S(intercoder agreement) ^_7 ;, í ÿ) Z 1_ XY23. TU ` $% & '() C DkU 1 , $% & '( ,-. ( / 0 123..

(16) . Table 1 7 ! "# $% & '( >? 7 XYZ[ \]S Table 2 !423. 7B D 7 .92 o" > ?

(17) WS ^_23. . ! "# $ % & '( C Dk ? j ? X Table 3 4 ÓÓ !423. 3? ±? p 2 ? L ) dm D ‘1E FG(1)’ ‘ -. &(5)’h3. ‘1E FG(1)’ D 3? ± ?)

(18) A 187ß p 80ß(42.8%)cU ¡ª ¼ , 0?)

(19) A 5ß(2.7%) ê 23. , ¼ A ` Fig. 1 ! ù5, LPG, « ¡.

(20) O s htuv Bw. 1 2 3 4 htuv Bw. 1 .92 1 1. Table 2.. Table 3.. 5. 6. 7. xy. .83. .83. .83. .92.

(21) < z xy { >|}~. x y >|}~ 2001, Vol. 45, No. 4. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2. 2.09 2 .91. 1.82 1.22. .51 .98. 1.14 1.39. 2.32 1.00. 1.44 1.31. .44 .71. 9.76 5.18.

(22) !". 374 Table 4.. 0 1 2 3. .

(23) < z hP 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 05(02.7) 54(28.9) 48(25.7) 80(42.8). 47(25.1) 18(09.6) 44(23.5) 78(41.7). 141(75.4) 014(07.5) 015(08.0) 017(09.1). 108(57.8) 115(12.7) 113(17.0) 161(32.6). 23(12.3) 13(11.6) 52(27.8) 109(58.3)1. 68(36.4) 37(19.8) 14(17.5) 68(36.4). 126(67.4) 141(21.9) 118(19.6) 112(11.1). ÊA ê¢q7 +¾`

(24) , ð û " µ 5 i »S, (, ¡, «, z- ¾ ! "# Ì 4 ¢q7 1E`) ñ :k " nh3. 1E p d æ 2?)

(25) A ` (48ß, 25.7%) u, ¾ ) æ§ î7 ¡ 29 ß, 5 «(o «) æ§ î7 ¡ 15 ßh3. ‘-. &(5)’S Ì L ±? )

(26) è3(109ß, 58.3%). ñî -. §) 7¡ § L §²Ùd = 2K L dmnr 2?)

(27) A À 52ß(27.8%)h·, ` dm ñî § U a ) ï]U Ó f, 8 ÊA ) U !X f ) ` y3. a" 3? ±? p 1? ) dm D ‘C MN O+(3)’ ‘T(7)’h3. ‘C M N O+(3)’ «X ` ð û 5Q) U a73 0") O+ § î fcU 1gh3(0?: 141ß, 75.4%; 1?: 14ß, 7.5%). C MN O+§ î \ # ó "#$) :% fA, ! "# Ø¾Z` $ ._ ¸&cU ¾_3. z{d aã $% & ' ( +) ¡9. Zâ .Sã 2Ú S ê , ` ‘') Z’< ÊA Ó± ã§ çA > (ÉU ì)) ¡'VS y3. ¯v ¾3 ×7 XY) C" < ³ KL. * ) ´ y) f3. ‘T (7)’ D "S «X ` Z

(28) ì. +d ÿ l T§ ç fcU 1gh 3(126ß, 67.4%). T 4S 2cd ñî « X) $+ +§ î uS ¼è3(41ß, 21.9%). "# + ñî «X y u, \« + 2?)

(29) A A ![ yhcd(9ß), 8 + Éó ÿ) u(3?) ÷h 3. :& $ ¡ +) TU B7 ! "# $%()) 7 uS, À 0"d T 0 $%) , · ¼A 9,18. 22. ræÐ) -3. z{d ‘/H IJ KL(2)’ 1.82?_ fcU 1gr, 0" 0 p C MN O+ '(A e1d .ï7 IJ) KL"n '(A 3 5 bA f) Ô yh3. D u òÉó I J) KL 3? ±?)

(30) A ¡ª ¼è (78 ß, 41.7%), z 3ÚcU 0? 2? ¼è3. z. · òÉó IJ ñî IJ) ³ KL 2?)

(31) A 44ß(23.5%) p i< /H { ¡§ I J`) \ 8 dÝ" ¾ uS ¼è3(19ß). ` `) Mã7 ;, ! L ë 0.cU Î yÚ) l73. 7Ö, Bõd IJ) . òÉó P-Q) R S"n '((4. P-Q RS) " 0?)

(32) A ¡ª ¼ (108ß, 57.8%), z 3Ú 3? ± ?)

(33) A ¼è3(61ß, 32.6%). , ¼A ` ð û 5 ) § î) , p d ´ y 3ó dS ´ yhé f3. ‘,-. $B(6)’ -. & ÃÙ" ,-. \/g #ü) Sý7 (3?) -. & þ/7 #ü) n (0?)¡ \23(68ß, 36.4%). V I " Ë& ` ! "# Ø¾Z` ì. + i0.§ î \/V ÷ u¡ ¼3 ¾ 7 n), +Q.cU §§´ y ÃÙ¡ / y3. ,-. ( ! "# $% & '( L/ /0. ! "# $% & '( ?< , -. ( ? L/) 123(Table 5). $% & '( 7B C DÀ 8 $i ?< .001 Rl7 L/) dm nh3. C D ?` L/ Ò4 Ù i U Rl2cd, ‘T(7)’ D< d0§ D` L/ 0¡ L.cU è3. ! "-0"-ì +`(1~6) L1/HV a", 2. 9,13. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(34)

(35) Table 5.. XHK

(36) b Y

(37) # ( XHK

(38) b. 1 2 3 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 2. .20** .30*** .28*** .37*** .17* .36*** .32*** .43***. .39*** .29*** .44*** .21** .44*** .02 .61***. .31*** .61*** .32*** .46*** .18* .77***. .35*** .29*** .39*** .13 .56***. 375. 4. 5. 6. 7. .35*** .55*** .18* .81***. .31*** .16* .53***. .32*** .79***. .38***. 1. *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001. M=8.32, SD=2.16.. `(1~6) ! "# ; +_ ‘T(7)’ /HV L.cU A fcU "Y´ y3. 2 7, ‘T(7)’ D (.44, Table 4) ü 3èé ?S 3ó D< L/ 0¡ A · 7 7¡ § Ï_ / y) f3. $% & '( $i ?< ,-. ( ? L/A r=.43cU Rl23 (p<.001). ¬/ - ! "# V «< ,-. ( ×7 /H y f \ ] # 3. C Dk # ¾ Bõd IJ) . P-Q) RS"n f(4. P-Q R S) L/ 0(r=.47)¡ ¡ª 4 fcU dm53. ‘P-Q RS(4)’ +V._ Bõ !¾3 +Q._ - ! "# + ¢q7 f½U, #. ,-. ( Bõ ! "#( /H . - ! "#( × /H3 "Y´ y3. ‘-. &(5)’ Ò4 - ! " #± qg fd z L/ 0(r=.17) è ·, D &· ræÐ) - kU ÷h á (Table 5)_ fcU ¾_3. 7Ö, ‘,-. $B(6)’ L/(r=.46) a. bèé f A, p 42ß) LcU 7 :& ,-. ( b)ã i0. $%) ,-. ( 3)ã 6. 4&7 $%) 2é f R7 # U 8 y3. 16,17. 23. 9. n ÑÒ ! "# $% & '() ¡ C7 B23. 187ß =4 ! 1E FG, 2001, Vol. 45, No. 4. /H IJ KL, C MN O+, P-Q RS, -. &, ,-. $B, T * $% & '() *+23. {7 '(` ,-. ( /0 S 123. # , À ê¢q7 +¾

(39) ! "# Ì 4 ¢q7 1E`) ñ :k" n fcU 1g h3. ì +) 0" «X ", /H I J) KL"n fA 35 Éö &d, RS"Ä ´ P-Q) l- O+§ î yh3. Z

(40) ì +d ÿ l T '(S ü e123. ¯v ! "# C MN O+d T +) x1´ y - I 7 ¡ ¢q3. `r ` 0 x7 ! " # $%()) B." ¾¤Ä 73. 27, ` ,-. (A $% & '(. Rl7 /HV) dmnh3. ¬/ - ! "# V ,-. ( ×7 /H y 3 :& ¾ < \Lo f3. ¯v i. 1 `S ¿ .cU ´ y ! "# I) æ 4 ` , -. ( L) C7 ) " ¾¤Ä 73. 7Ö, L , ¹, _Ï !7.hc½U, # \Ì C" ¾3 i0._ IcU :+7 ¼A `) L cU Ì ´ ¢q¡ y3. :& # ` ) æ´ á, Bõ, [ '(, _§ Q, Z¤ ¿'ø 37 ! "#Z _ $% & '( C D` /0S 1" 8 ¢q¡ y3. ¤ { 37 n ÑÒ " $% & '( B"Ä ´ f3. ! "# + 7 ¾3 V49 °± ¤²v, ©ª Ë 16,17. 24. 9,23,25.

(41) !". 376. +7 l ! "# -) Ë& · = Æ._ SÐ) !´ fcU 3.. 1.. ; :

(42) ,. 1997. 2. Bunce, D. M.; Gabel, D. L.; Samuel, J. V. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1991, 28, 505. 3. Bunce, D. M; Heikkinen, H. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1986, 23, 11. 4. Noh, T.; Scharmann, L. C. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1997, 34, 199. 5. Tingle, J. B.; Good, R. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27, 671. 2001, 21, 289. 6. ; 7. Friedel, A. W.; Gabel, D. L; Samuel, J. School Science and Mathematics 1990, 90, 674. 8. Berenson, S. B.; Carter, G. S. School Science and Mathematics 1995, 95, 182. 1997, 17, 75. 9. ; 10. Larkin, J. H.; Rainard, B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1984, 21, 235. 11. ; ; ; ; ; : , 1999. 12. Huffman, D. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1997, 34, 551.. . .

(43)

(44) ! "#

(45). 13. Woods, D. R. In. What research says to the science teacher: Problem solving; Gabel, D. L., Ed.; National Science Teachers Association: Washington, DC, 1989; pp 97-121. 14. ; 1996, 23, 102. 15. Chandran, S.; Treagust, D. F.; Tobin, K. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1987, 24, 145. 16. ; ; ; 2000, 44, 68. 17. Niaz, M.; Lawson, A. E. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1985, 22, 41. 18. ; ; ; 1996, 16, 389. 19. Heller, P.; Keith, R.; Anderson, S. American Journal of Physics 1992, 60, 627. 20. Roadrangka, V.; Yeany, R. H.; Padilla, M. J. The construction and validation of Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT); Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching: Dallas, 1983. 21. Bunce, D. M.; Hutchinson, K. D. Journal of Chemical Education 1993, 70, 183. 22. Dalby, J.; Tourniaire, F.; Linn, M. C. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1986, 23, 427. 23. ; 1996, 16, 278. 24. Shayer, M.; Adey, P. S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29, 1101. 25. ; ; 2000, 20, 214.. . $ %& . '( %& . ) . '* . Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(46)

High School Students’ Problem-Solving Strategy-Performing AbilityMeasured by an Essay-Type Test  

High School Students’ Problem-Solving Strategy-Performing AbilityMeasured by an Essay-Type Test