• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Evaluation of Rice Wine Waste as Substrate for Use in Acid Mine Drainage Treatment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Evaluation of Rice Wine Waste as Substrate for Use in Acid Mine Drainage Treatment"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Vol. 49, No. 1 O2012PG pp. 18-25

ॺনֈॺࢼ৤ళࠤࠜ଍෉׆ாࢄாߦছ࠭Տࠤਉ߇஺ඌԧ

׌լ࠮



 ׌۩ผ



 ࢽฅ୺



Evaluation of Rice Wine Waste as Substrate for Use in Acid Mine Drainage Treatment

Gyoung-Man Kim, Dae-Hoon Kim and Hwanjo Baek

Abstract : The spent mushroom compost(SMC) has been generally used as substrate for passive treatment systems, especially for SAPS in Korea. More effective substitutes to replace the SMC have always been a major concern in this area. In this study, rice wine waste(RWW) was tested as substrates for use in acid mine drainage treatment.

Batch tests were conducted to evaluate the material’s efficiency in reducing sulfates and removing heavy metals within the artificial AMD. Test results showed that both SMC and RWW have similar efficiency in total sulfate reduction capacity. However, the RWW has a little higher reducing rate, and the mixture of SMC and RWW showed the highest reducing rate. In terms of the heavy metal removal, including Fe, Al, and Cu, both materials showed similar results. Overall, the batch test results indicated that RWW has a good potential as a substrate for SAPS.

Key words : Substrate, Sulfate reducing bacteria, Acid mine drainage, Reduction rate, Passive treatment system څ أ ĶǴٍۙ܁জ֨Ժ, ࣢০؎ࠢνԦՁܓəܳͿѣԿࣅҼεşݗНݗͿԐڌॠČەڷǣۋεʂߕॣ

սەəşݗНݗۆঝ҃Àज़څॢ֬܁ۋɰ. ٍ҆ĵقԴəԓՁġԓѕսߌνεڦॢşݗНݗͿԴφèν

֢͠ݓۆÀɠՁںथÀॠٕɰ. 27ێÂۆbatch testεࣀ३ѣԿࣅҼٮφèν֢͠ݓۆ܁জমڱ, ݌ডԓّ

фܼŚ՚ۆ܃äমęεҼİॠٕɰ. ˃şݗНݗϿ˃ߪ܃äʽডԓّۆتڹҼ֦॰ڷǣ, ডԓّঞڙ՚ʪ əφèν֢͠ݓÀܓŚʌȭڹìڷͿǣࢍǮɰ. ̚ॢ˃Нݗںঔ०ॢąڍ, ߪঞڙ͟ęঞڙ՚ʪقԴ

Àۤܞڹমęεǣࢍǻɰ. ˃şݗНݗϿ˃ȭڹFe, Al Cuۆ܃äমڱںٕ҃ɰ. Batch test Āęεܛ०३

҇˺, φèν֢͠ݓÀ؎ࠢνԦՁܓۆşݗНݗͿԴۆটڌÀɠՁۋঝۍॠٕɰ.

ܳڅر  şݗНݗ, ডԓّঞڙŒ, ԓՁġԓѕս, ঞڙ՚ʪ, ٍۙ܁জ֨Ժ

2012ț1ښ3ێۿս, 2012ț2ښ7ێ֮ԐٰΒ 2012ț2ښ22ێóۦঝ܁

1) Ìڙʂॡİʂॡڙقȃݓۙڙėॡę

2) Ìڙʂॡİėęʂॡقȃݓۙڙėॡęİս

*Corresponding Author(іঞܓ) E-mail; [email protected]

Address; Department of Energy resource engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea

Դ΁

ԓՁġԓѕս(Acid mine drainage, AMD)əĶǴٽق Դψڹঞą١ّںڮьॢɰ. ۋəǰڹpH, ȭڹডԓ

ّęܼŚ՚ȬʪÀ࣢ݜۋ϶ܳͿԵ࢏ęŚ՚ġԓقԴ

ьԦॢɰ(Johnson and Hallberg, 2005). ۋεߌνॠə

ѓѪڹࡾóactive systemępassive systemڷͿǣɉݕ ɰ. ۻۙəߌνমڱڹ̬رǣݓχ, ڮݓҼڌۋȭČ֢

͠ݓۆьԦۋЛ܃Àʽɰ. ঳ۙəԜʂۺڷͿۺڹڮ ݓҼڌۋ˞ݓχ, ߯ߣ֨ėɳćقԴԜʂۺڷͿҼڌۋ

ψۋ˞Č֨֟ࢰق߹ۺʽࠞۻНۆ؋܁Ձۋҝঝ֬ॠ ɰə ɳ۾ۋ ەɰ(Johnson and Hallberg, 2002; 2005).

Ŕ͠ǣpassive systemڹǰڹڮݓҼڌęۺڹইۤě ν ֨Â, ٽݕݓًق ۺڌÀɠॠş ˺Лق ĶǴٽقԴ

ψۋ ۋڌʼČ ەɰ(؋ܛχˣ, 2011).

ĶǴقԴəݓŚūݓ30يÒۆ֨ԺۋæԺʽцەڷ

϶, ĶٽقԴʪpassive systemۋAMD ߌνقۋڌʼČ

ەɰ(ݓԜڍ, 2004; Dvorak et al., 1992; Gusek et al., 1999). ۋ͠ॢߌνę܁ۆܳڅşܼۚॠǣəডԓّ

ঞڙŒ(Sulfate reducing bacteria, SRB)ںۋڌॠيড ԓّںঞڙ֨ࢅČܼŚ՚ںҝڌՁۆŚ՚ডজНۆ঍

ࢗͿ ࠞۻ֨ࢅə ìۍʚ, ۋ ۚڌقԴ ज़սۺۍ ìۋ

SRBۆۻۙėيߕÀʼəşݗНݗęۻۙսڌߕͿۚ

ٍĵȦЛ

(2)

Table 1. Chemical composition of limestone

Components Wt(%)

Al2O3 0.01

CaO 50.49

Fe2O3(Total) 0.1

K2O N.D

MgO 1.21

MnO 0.03

Na2O N.D

P2O5 N.D

SiO2 0.02

TiO2 0.00

L.O.I 46.96

Total 99.83

L.O.I : loss on ignition, N.D : not detected ڌॠə ডԓّۆ ܕۦۋɰ.

şݗНݗڹSRBεڦॢ࢏ՙڙۋ϶˰͆Դۺ०ॢş ݗНݗۆԸ࢘ڹpassive system Ժć, ࣢০؎ࠢνԦՁ ܓ(Successive Alkalinity Producing System, SAPS) Ժ ćقەرܼڅॢۍۙۋɰ. ێъۺڷͿҼڌۼÇęۦ টڌࠑϸقԴşݗНݗڹȬغęěʹʽदşНۋܳε

ۋΘČ ەɰ. ĶǴقԴə ڍқ, ѣԿࣅҼ, ޷ǣИࣅҼ, ࢾёࣅҼ ˣۋ ٍĵʼؽڷ϶(܁ٖڎ ˣ, 1997; ݓԜڍ, 2004; ťąχ, 2008; ؋ܛχˣ, 2011), ĶٽقԴəMaple wood, poultry manure, Leaf compost, Oak leaf, Conifer ˣںʂԜڷͿٍĵÀݕॱʽцەɰ(Gibert et al., 2004;

Zagury et al., 2006; Zagury and Neculita, 2008). ߯Ŗ قəঔ०şݗНݗۆ܁জমڱۋɳێşݗНݗ҃ɰ

ʌȭɰəìۋۓݒʼرۋ˞ۆ߯ۺঔ०ҼڱںĀ܁

ॠə ٍĵ˞ۋ սॱʼşʪ ॠٕɰ(Cocos et al., 2002;

Amos and Younger, 2003; Neculita and Zagury, 2008).

ۋٽقʪɾн(molasses)(Teclu et al., 2009)ۋǣڮۤ

(whey)(Christensen et al., 1996)ߌͤ֩ुėغقԴь Ԧʽ दşНقʂॢ ٍĵÀ ݕॱʽцەɰ.

ĶǴقəѣԿࣅҼÀSAPSۆܳşݗНݗͿԐڌʽ ɰ. Ŕ͠ǣѣԿࣅҼьԦ͟ۆॢćٮڏբҼҙɺˣۋ

Л܃۾ڷͿݓۺʽцەɰ(ےţۦ, 2002; Ji et al., 2008).

ѣԿࣅҼقχۆܕॠČەəĶǴۆąڍҼİۺ֖ó

ࠄ˛ॣսەəşݗНݗঝ҃قЀशε˅ٍĵÀज़څ ॠɰ. ؋ܛχˣ(2011)ڹۋ͠ॢЛ܃۾ں३Āॠşڦ ३ڍқę޷ǣИदЀںԐڌॢٍĵقԴڍқ40%ٮ

޷ǣИदЀ40%ۆঔ०Ҽڱں܃֨ॠٕɰ. ܁ݕږ(2011) ڹڍқęÄʂεঔ०ॢঔ०НۋۤşÂۆě۾ڷͿ

ѣԿࣅҼε ʂߕ ॣս ەɰČ҃Čॠٕɰ.

ٍ҆ĵۆЀۺڹSAPSۆşݗНݗͿԴφèν֢͠

ݓটڌÀɠՁںथÀॠəìۋɰ. ۋεڦ३ডԓّঞ ڙęܼŚ՚܃äۆࠑϸقԴѣԿࣅҼٮŔমęεҼİ ॠٕɰ. ࢎܳ͆ČʪҝνəφèνəčΪ(ܳͿַęн ÀΘ)ۆܳՁқۍۻқݗںɾқڷͿۻঞ֨ࡈ܃ܓॢ

ցۋ϶, ьমڙڹɀΙۋɰ(يսঞ, 2010). φèνۆԦ ԓ͟ڹ۾޲ݒÀॠČەڷ϶, ࣢০2010țߪԦԓ͟ڹ

352,573(kL)Ϳ 2008ț ʂҼ 2.5ѕ ݒÀॠٕɰ(ࣀćߔ, 2011). Ŕ͠ǣφèν֢͠ݓεটڌॢٍĵəäۆػ ə ֬܁ۋɰ. ߯Ըৠ(2009)ə উşۺ ԜࢗقԴ φèν

֢͠ݓεşݗНݗͿսՙԦՁ࣢Ձęۺڌমęقěॢ

ٍĵεսॱॠٕڷ϶, ťٰԾ(2011)ڹφèν֢͠ݓε

ۋڌॠي ڮԓŒڷͿ ؎Ͳ܋ەə probiotic bacteriaۆ

Ԧۤقěॢٍĵεսॱॢцەɰ. ˃ٍĵϿ˃йԦ НںڦॢڮşНͿφèν֢͠ݓεটڌॢٚۋɰ. ۋ

͠ॢٍĵĀęəφèν֢͠ݓÀSRBεڦॢ࢏ՙڙ

ڷͿԴ Ŕ ÀɠՁں ҃يܵɰČ ԦÁʽɰ.

ٍĵѓѪ

֬ॹۦΒ

֬ॹۦΒəφèν֢͠ݓٮѣԿࣅҼͿۋεşݗН ݗͿԐڌॠٕɰ. φèν֢͠ݓəÌڙʪߺߎقڦ࠘

ॢՙőϿتܓۤقԴսݚॠٕڷ϶, ցީǛй͆Čʪҝ νə, φèνε܃ܓॠČǫڹदşНۋɰ. ࠄ˛ॢφè ν֢͠ݓəÌॢφèνǸԞÀǣ϶սқęީƃşÀ

ঔۦʽԜࢗͿ, أॢ۾Ձݗۋ϶ۓۙÀگ؋ڷͿĵѻ ʼݓ؍əɰ. ԐڌʽѣԿࣅҼə߿ߔǫʪقڦ࠘ॢѣ ԿȬۤقԴࠄ˛ॠٕɰ. ѣԿࣅҼəئČš঍ࢗͿ, ֬ ॹقə12 cm ܁ʪۆࡾşͿ۞͆Ԑڌॠٕɰ. ˃ş ݗНݗϿ˃֬ॹۻԜ٣قԴæܓ֨ࡈԐڌॠٕɰ. ˃

֨Β ܼ ێҙə ॢĶşߣęॡݓڙٍĵڙ(Դڐ қڙ)ۆ

ڙՙқԵş(Flash EA, CE Instruments)εۋڌॠي࢏

ՙٮݗՙۆ॥͟ںқԵॠٕɰ. ֨ΒۆpH ࠑ܁ڹɰڼ ęÏڹۼ޲Ϳࠑ܁ॠٕɰ. Ϥ۹Œݗॢ֨Β5 gęݒ Ϊս25 mLε50 mLقԴ1֨Âʴ؋ѓ࠘ॢ঳ইࢎں

χ˞ČpHε ࠑ܁ॠٕɰ(Hach HQ40d). AMDۆǰڹ

pHεܼজ֨࢈ЀۺڷͿԵধԵںԐڌॠٕɰ. Ԑڌʽ

ԵধԵڹÌڙʪقڦ࠘ॢԵধԵȤߎ޽ĹۤقԴ޽ࠄॢ

ìڷͿʂ͜13 mm܁ʪͿࣷթॢ঳֬ॹقԐڌॠٕڷ

϶ॢĶşߣęॡݓڙٍĵڙ(Դڐқڙ)ۆXRF(Epsilon 5)ε

ۋڌॠي Ձқں қԵॠٕɰ(Table 1). Ԑڌʽ ԵধԵڹ

CaO॥͟ۋ50.49wt.%ͿҼİۺȭڹ॥͟ںǣࢍǻɰ.

(3)

Table 2. Composition of synthetic AMD in batch test

Component Concentration (mg/L) Source

pH 3.0 -

ORP 202.6 (mV) -

Fe 192.2 FeSO47H2O

Al 104.1 Al2(SO4)314-18H2O

Cu 20.5 CuSO45H2O

SOÑ 1140 -

Table 3. Composition of mixtures assessed in batch test

Case Mixture(g)

# 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5

Spent Mushroom Compost 3 - 1.5 3 -

Rice wine waste - 3 1.5 - 3

Limestone 3

SRB medium 5 ml -

SRB ѕت

SRBۿܛںڦ३ڮşН֨ΒٮPostgate B ѕݓεۋ ڌॠيSRBεѕتॠٕɰ. ڮşН֨ΒəॢĶݓݗۙڙ

ٍĵڙݓݗۦ३ٍĵ֬قԴݓڙыؕɰ. ԟۋêČড জսՙǸԞεঝۍॣսەؽڷ϶, ۋ֨ΒεPostgate B ѕݓقȏرSRBεѕتॠٕɰ. ѕتؚقԴÌॢড জսՙ ǸԞεঝۍ ॢ ঳ ֬ॹق Ԑڌॠٕɰ.

ۍėAMD

֬ॹقԐڌʽAMDəܼŚ՚शܵڌؚęݒΪսε

ۋڌॠيۍėۺڷͿ܃ܓॠٕɰ. ডԓںۋڌॠيAMD ۆpHε3.0Ϳܓۼॠٕڷ϶, ܃ܓقԐڌʽ֨أۆĵ Ձę AMDۆ ܓՁڹ Table 2ٮ Ïɰ.

֬ॹĵՁ

֬ॹڹߪ27ێÂսॱॠٕڷ϶, ֬ॹقԐڌʽъڿ НݗڹşݗНݗ3 g, ԵধԵ3 gęѕتؚ5 mLεঔ० ॠيԐڌॠٕɰ. ъڿНݗں120 mL ڮνѿъڿşق

ߐÀॢ঳, 110 mLۆAMDεѿقߐÀॠيėşͿ޽

ڗݕҙқں߯ՙজॠٕɰ. ֬ॹڹTable 3ęÏۋĵ Ձॠٕɰ. # 1ę2əѣԿࣅҼٮφèν֢͠ݓۆমę εҼİॠşڦॢìۋ϶Ԑͻ3ڹঔ०॰ںąڍۆম ęε҃şڦॢìۋɰ. # 4ٮ5ۆąڍقəѕتؚں

ߐÀॠݓ؍ؕڷ϶ۋəʂܓķڷͿۋڌʼؽɰ. ֬ॹۆ

܁ঝՁںڦ३ÁԐͻѻͿ2Ò؂ܵҼॠٕڷ϶, ߪ90 Òۆڮνѿۋ֬ॹقԐڌʼؽəʚॢѥۆ֨Β޽ࠄ

ɾॢÒۆъڿşχںԐڌॠٕɰ. ֬ॹ֨٣ʪə२٣ սܓε ۋڌॠي 23ε ڮݓ֨ࡎɰ.

֨Β޽ࠄфқԵ

֨Β޽ࠄə3ێÂüڷͿսॱॠٕڷ϶ڦقԴسśॢ

ìߌͤ֨Β޽ࠄεॢъڿşə֬ॹقԴ܃ٽ֨ࡎɰ. ֨ Β޽ࠄݔ঳pHٮORPεࠑ܁ॠٕڷ϶(Hach HQ40d), 0.45 łm ज़ࢢεۋڌॠيज़ࢢτںॠٕɰ. ज़ࢢτ঳

ܼŚ՚қԵںڦॢ֨ΒəȬݗԓںߐÀॠٕڷ϶ܼŚ՚

қԵڹICPεۋڌॠٕɰ(OPTIMA 7300 DV, Perkinelmer).

ডԓّۋ٣ȬʪəқġġʪćεۋڌॠيқԵॠٕɰ (sulfaVer 4 method, Hach DR 2800).

ٍĵĀę

ۦΒ࣢Ձ

࢏ՙٮݗՙ॥͟ڹSRBεۋڌॢAMD ܁জমڱق

ٖॳں ܳə ܳڅ ۍۙ˞ ܼ ॠǣۋɰ(Béchard et al., 1994; Waybrant et al., 1998; Cocos et al., 2002). ࢏ՙ ٮݗՙ॥͟ڹC/N Ҽćԓقۋڌʼəʚ, şܕٍĵۙ

˞ڹɰتॢѩڦۆC/N Ҽε܃֨ॠٕɰ. Reinertsen et al.(1984)ęBéchard et al.(1994)əأ10܁ʪۆC/N Ҽ Àۺ܁ॠɰČ҃Čॠٕڷ϶, Prasad et al.(1999)ə10 ۋॠۆC/N ҼÀۺ܁ॠɰČ҃Čॠٕɰ. ̚ॢ؋ܛχ (2011)ڹ 2540ۍ ąڍÀ ࢍɾॠɰČ ҃Čॠٕɰ. ҆

ٍĵقԐڌʽѣԿࣅҼٮφèν֢͠ݓۆ࢏ՙ, ݗՙ

(4)

Table 4. Characterization of organic materials

Parameters Spent Mushroom Compost Rice wine waste

C 22.92 47.24

N 2.43 7.73

C/N 9.4 6.1

pH 7.62 4.83

Fig. 1. Changes in pH and ORP.

Fig. 2. Changes in sulfate.

॥͟, pHٮC/N ҼəTable 4ٮÏɰ. φèν֢͠ݓÀ

ѣԿࣅҼقҼ३࢏ՙٮݗՙ॥͟ۋȭڷ϶pHəφè ν֢͠ݓÀʌǰڹÉںٕ҃ɰ. ćԓʽѣԿࣅҼٮφ èν ֢͠ݓۆ C/N Ҽə ÁÁ 9.4, 6.1Ϳ, ѣԿࣅҼÀ

Reinertsen et al.(1984)ęBéchard et al.(1994)ۋ܃؋ॢ

߯ۺ C/N Ҽق Àūڝɰ.

pHٮORP

ԵধԵۆٖॳڷͿϿ˜ԐͻقԴpH ݒÀÀě޶ʼ ؽɰ(Fig. 1). ֬ॹ֨ۚ3ێ঳pHə3قԴथŒ6.5܁

ʪͿӇδݒÀε҃ۋɰÀ֬ॹܛΒūݓ۾ݕۺۍݒ Àεٕ҃ɰ. ߯ܛۺڷͿʪɵॢpHə# 15قԴÁÁ

7.75, 6.86, 7.54, 7.4, 7.4ٕڷ϶, Ͽ˜ԐͻقԴ֬ॹş ÂǴǴ6.57.7ۆѩڦεڮݓॠٕɰ. ێъۺڷͿSRB Ԧۤںڦॢ߯ۺpH ѩڦə59Ϳ؎Ͳ܋ەɰ(Postgate, 1984). Ͽ˜ ԐͻقԴ ۋ͠ॢܓæۋ ܓՁʼؽɰ.

ঞڙঞąۆܓՁيҙəORPεࠑ܁॥ڷͿ׆؎ս

ەɰ. ֬ॹܛΒ֨ūݓ # 5ѥں ܃ٽॢϿ˜ԐͻقԴ

-200 mVۆÉںٕ҃ɰ(Fig. 1). 6ێݫࠑ܁ʽORP É ڹ-86.8, -180, -80.9, -30.0, -17.3 mVۋČŔۋ঳ҙࢢ

# 5ε܃ٽॢϿ˜ԐͻقԴć՚ۺۍORPۆÇՙ߸Ճ εঝۍॣսەؽɰ. # 2ٮ# 3ڹ12ێݫҙࢢ, # 1ڹ

15ێݫҙࢢ-300 mV ۋॠۆÉںٕ҃ɰ. ۿܛڙۋػ ə# 4ə-200 G-250 mVۆѩڦε҃ۍъϸۿܛڙ ۋػČφèν֢͠ݓٮԵধԵڷͿχۋΘرݕ# 5ə

20 G -70 mVūݓۆÉںٕ҃ɰ.

ORPÀ-100 mV ۋॠۆܓæۋSRB Ԧۤقज़څॠ

϶(Postgate, 1984), Prasad ˣ(1999)ڹ-300 mVۆORP ÀԦۤقۺۼॢܓæۋ͆Čॠٕɰ. ҆֬ॹقԴə#

1, 2, 3ۋۋ͠ॢܓæں߿қ০χܔ॰ş˺Лقۺۼॢ

ঞڙܓæں Í߸ؽɰČ ࣺɳʽɰ.

ডԓّۆѺজ

Fig. 2ə֬ॹşÂʴ؋ÁԐͻѻডԓّȬʪۆѺজ εǣࢍǶìۋɰ. SRB ۿܛڙۋप॥ʽ# 1, 2, 3ڹۋ ٣ȬʪÀ֨Âąęق˰͆Çՙॢъϸ, ۿܛڙۋܕۦ ॠݓ؍ə# 4, 5əȬʪÀݒÀॠäǣওڹێ܁ॠó

(5)

Fig. 3. Changes in amount of removed sulfate.

Table 5. Summary of changes in sulfate

Case

Sulfate concentration(mg/L) Sulfate reduction

ratioa (%)

Amount of removed

sulfateb (mg/L)

Sulfate reduction

rates (mg/L/d)

RÏ Initial at 27days mean

(327days)

Amount of released sulfate

(mean)

# 1 1140 1380 - - 40 910 -31.79 0.93

# 2 1140 30 - - 97 957 -46.07 0.95

# 3 1140 510 - 498 69 1128 -58.75 0.98

# 4 1140 2040 2290±160 1150 - - - -

# 5 1140 960 987±79 -153 - - - -

* Assumed mean sulfate concentration of a control reactor of # 3 was about 1638±95 mg/L, calculated by using those of # 4 and # 5.

* a and b were calculated by using mean sulfate concentration of control reactors(# 4,5) including # 3.

ڮݓʼؽɰ. ߣş1140 mg/Lۋؽʏডԓّڹ27ێ঳

# 15قԴÁÁ1380, 30, 510, 2040, 960 mg/Lεǣࢍ

ǻɰ. ѣԿࣅҼÀप॥ʽ# 1, 3ڹ֬ॹߣşɳćقԴড ԓّۆԜ֧ۋǣࢍǦ঳ݓ՚ۺڷͿÇՙॠٕɰ. ۋق

ъ३φèν֢͠ݓÀप॥ʼرەə# 2əডԓّۆݒ Àػۋݓ՚ۺڷͿÇՙॠəąॳںٕ҃ɰ. # 1, 3قԴ ۆۋ͠ॢԜ֧ڹѣԿࣅҼقۆॢٖॳۋ͆Čࣺɳʽɰ.

ۋ͠ॢԐͻəşܕٍĵۙۆٍĵĀęقԴʪ҃Čʽц

ەɰ(ݓԜڍٮ܁ٖڎ, 2005; ؋ܛχˣ, 2011; Neculita et al., 2011). ؋ܛχˣ(2010)ڹۿܛڙۋػəѣԿࣅҼ قԴ3000 mg/L ۋԜۆডԓّۋ٣ۋڌ߻ʿں҃Čॠ

ٕɰ. ٍ҆ĵقԴə֬ॹߣş2500 mg/LūݓݒÀॢ

঳ أÂۆ Çՙε ٕ҃ݓχ, 25002040 mg/L Ԑۋۆ

Ȭʪεٕ҃ڷ϶3ێҙࢢ27ێūݓডԓّȬʪथŒڹ

أ2290 mg/LͿ1150 mg/Lۆডԓّۋڌ߻ʽìڷͿ

ǣࢍǮɰ(# 4). # 5əφèν֢͠ݓۆʂܓķ֨ΒͿԴ

ডԓّڌ߻ڹǣࢍǣݓ؍ؕڷ϶, ߣşAMD ȬʪٮÏ ڹ1140قԴҙࢢ960 mg/Lۆѩڦεٕ҃ɰ. # 3قԴə

ߣşݒÀॠʏডԓّۋ6ێҙࢢÇՙॠəąॳںٕ҃

ڷ϶, ߸܁ʽ# 3ۆডԓّۆڌ߻͟ڹأ498 mg/Lۋɰ.

ߣş࣊ۓ॰ʏAMDۆডԓّȬʪٮ߯ܛȬʪχں

ҼİॠɰϸşݗНݗقۆॢডԓّۆঞڙমęε܃ʂ Ϳࣷ؊ॣսػɰ. # 1(ѣԿࣅҼ)ۆąڍߣşȬʪÀ

1140 mg/Lۋ϶߯ܛȬʪə1380 mg/Lۋɰ. ۋقҼ३

# 2(φèν֢͠ݓ)قԴۆ߯ܛȬʪə30 mg/Lۋɰ. ֬

܃Ϳ# 1قԴəSRBقۆॢডԓّۋ٣ۆঞڙۋьԦ

॰ş˺Лق˃şݗНݗۆ߯ܛȬʪχںҼİॢɰϸ

ѣԿࣅҼۆঞڙমęÀęՙथÀʾսەɰ. ۋεࣷ؊

ॠşڦ३ؘԴćԓʽڌ߻͟ںۋڌॠي֬ॹܛΒ֨

۾ںşܵڷͿ܃äʽডԓّߪ͟ںćԓॠٕɰ. ۋͩ

óćԓʽ# 13قԴۆߪ܃ä͟ڹأ910, 957, 1128

mg/Lۋɰ. Ҽ΀߯ܛۺڷͿࠑ܁ʽডԓّۆȬʪəɰ βݓχ, ߪ͟ۆě۾قԴ# 1(ѣԿࣅҼ), # 2(φèν֢

͠ݓ)εҼİ३Ҏں˺ۋˆڹäۆҼ֦ॠɰČԦÁ

ॣսەɰ. ۋقҼ३˃şݗНݗںঔ०ॢ# 3ڹܘ

ʌȭڹ܃ä͟ںٕ҃ɰ. Fig. 3ڹथŒڌ߻͟ڷͿć ԓʽ ডԓّ ܃ä͟ۆ Ѻজε ǣࢍǶ Ŕ॒͒ۋɰ.

̚ɰδҼİεڦ३ধŊқԵںۋڌॠيঞڙ՚ʪ (sulfate reduction rates)εćԓॠٕɰ(Waybrant et al., 1998). ֬ॹߣşҙࢢ6ێūݓۆۙΒəտڿşÂ(acclimation periods)قʂॢٖॳںыş˺Лقćԓ֨ۻߕۙΒ εԐڌॠݓ؍Č6ێҙࢢ27ێūݓۆۙΒχںۋڌॠ

ٕɰ. # 2ۆąڍقə6ێҙࢢ24ێūݓۆۙΒεۋڌ ॠٕəʚ, υݓφȬʪۙΒə0 mg/LقÀūڏ30 mg/L ͿধŊқԵٖ֨ॳںܶսەş˺Лۋؽɰ. ؘԴş ցॢĀęٮćԓʽঞڙ՚ʪεTable 5ق܁νॠٕɰ.

(6)

Fig. 4. Changes in Fe, Al and Cu concentration over time in batch test.

ćԓʽঞڙ՚ʪəڼۆÉۋࡾϸࢁս΀ȭڹ՚ʪε

ۆйॢɰ. # 1(-31.76 mg/L/d)ۋÀۤǰڹÉںٕ҃ڷ

϶ŔɰڼڷͿə# 2(-46.07 mg/L/d), # 3ۋÀۤȭڹ

-58.75 mg/L/dͿćԓʼؽɰ. χأ# 1ę3ۆ߯ܛȬʪ À# 2ߌͤ0 mg/LقŖۿॢɰϸćԓʽÉۋɵ͆ݗ

ÀɠՁۋەںìۋɰ. ॠݓχ, ۋۙΒÀbatch testε

ۋڌॠي˃şݗНݗںҼİॠəЀۺںڦ३Դə߿қ ॠɰČ ԦÁʽɰ. ѣԿࣅҼٮ φèν ֢͠ݓۆ ডԓّ

ঞڙڱۆ޲ۋəࡾݓχ, ডԓّঞڙ͟ڹäۆҼ֦ॠ ɰ. ঞڙ՚ʪəφèν֢͠ݓÀܘʌȭڹìڷͿǣࢍ

Ǯɰ. ۋ͠ॢĀęəডԓّঞڙۆࠑϸقԴφèν֢

͠ݓۆ ÀɠՁں ҃يܳČ ەɰ.

ܼŚ՚Ȭʪ

Fig. 4ə֬ॹşÂʴ؋Fe, Al, Cu ȬʪѺজεʪ֨ॢ

Ŕ॒͒ۋɰ. ˃şݗНݗęঔ०НϿ˃ȭڹ܃äڱں

ٕ҃ɰ. # 1قԴۆFe ȬʪѺজεԕट҃ϸ, 3ێūݓə

śü০ÇՙॠɰÀ9ێūݓݒÀॠٕɰ. Ŕ঳Çՙॠə

ąॳںǣࢍǻɰ. φèν֢͠ݓÀप॥ʽ# 2ə3ێ঳

ԜʂۺڷͿۺڹتۋÇՙॠٕݓχ, Ŕ঳قə۾޲ۺ ڷͿÇՙॠٕɰ. Alۆąڍقə3ێ޲ق# 1, 2, 3قԴ

2 mg/LۆǰڹÉں҃ۍ঳, ێ܁ॠóڮݓʼؽɰ. Cu قԴə3ێ޲ق# 1, 3ڹ1 mg/LۋॠۆÉں, # 2ə6 mg/LۆÉںǣࢍǻڷ϶, Ŕۋ঳۾޲Çՙॠٕɰ. ֬ ॹܛΒ֨۾قԴ# 13ۆFe, Al, Cu ܃äڱڹ99% ۋ Ԝۋؽɰ.

ۿܛڙۋܕۦॠݓ؍ə# 4ٮ5εԕट҃ϸ, ѣԿࣅ Ҽχܕۦॠə# 4ə3ێ঳ࠑ܁ʽFe Ȭʪεć՚ڮ ݓॠٕɰ. ԜʂۺڷͿۺڹتۆFeÀÇՙॢ# 5əݓ

՚ۺۍȬʪÇՙεٕ҃ɰ. AlقԴə3ێ঳äۆʂҙ қۋ܃äʼؽɰ. CuقԴə, # 4À# 5قҼ३ߣşق

ψڹȬʪÀÇՙॠٕČۋ঳قə˃ԐͻϿ˃۾޲ۺڷ ͿÇՙॠٕɰ. # 4ٮ5قԴFe ܃äڱڹ8083%, Al ę Cuۆ ܃äڱڹ 95100%ۋɰ.

AMDقԴܼŚ՚ۆ܃äə˃ÀݓࠑϸڷͿԺϼॣ

սەɰ. ߒݫəşݗНݗقۆॢড়޳ęŚ՚սԓজН Ϳۆࠞۻۋ϶˃ѥݫəSRBقۆॢŚ՚ডজНͿۆ

ࠞۻۋɰ. ড়޳ۚڌقۆॢ܃äəψڹٍĵۙقۆ३

ঝۍʼؽɰ(Hammack et al., 1994; ܁ٖڎˣ, 1997; ڌ

ٖ҃ˣ, 2010; ؋ܛχˣ, 2011). pHٮORPεࣀ३6ێ ݫҙࢢə# 1, 2, 3 ъڿşǴҙقঞڙঞąۋܓՁʼؽ ɰəìں؎սەɰ. ডԓّۋ٣ȬʪÀ6ێݫҙࢢ

ÇՙॠəԐ֬ʪۋε˓ыࠞ३ܵɰ. ˰͆Դ6ێۋۻū ݓ܃äʽܼŚ՚ڹড়޳ęŚ՚սԓজНͿࠞۻʽĀę ۋɰ. Ŕۋ঳ܼŚ՚ڹŚ՚ডজНͿۆࠞۻওڹࠞۻ

ęড়޳قۆॢ܃äۋɰ. ڦĀęεܛ०३҇˺, ˃

şݗНݗ Ԑۋق ড়޳ɠͳق ʂॢ ޲ۋə ܕۦॠݓχ,

ܼŚ՚܃äমڱڹäۆ޲ۋÀǣݓ؍əìڷͿঝۍ ʼؽɰ.

(7)

Ā΁

ٍ҆ĵقԴəSAPSܓşݗНݗͿԴφèν֢͠ݓ εԸ܁ॠيѣԿࣅҼٮۆҼİεࣀ३ŔۺڌՁںथ À३҃ؕɰ. φèν ֢͠ݓə ѣԿࣅҼق Ҽ३ ࢏ՙٮ

ݗՙ॥͟ۋȭČC/N ҼəѣԿࣅҼÀأÂȭڹÉڷ ͿǣࢍǮɰ. ˃şݗНݗۆORP, ডԓّ܃ä͟, ܼŚ

՚܃äڱںҼİ३Ҏں˺φèν֢͠ݓÀѣԿࣅҼ ٮڮԐॢąॳںǣࢍǻɰ. ডԓّঞڙ՚ʪۆąڍφ èν֢͠ݓÀܓŚʌȭؕڷ϶, ܼŚ՚ড়޳মęəѣ ԿࣅҼÀφèν֢͠ݓقҼ३ԜʂۺڷͿڍսॠٕɰ.

̚ॢ˃şݗНݗۆঔ०НۋɳێşݗНݗقҼ३ডԓ

ّঞڙقԴʌȭڹমęÀەؽɰ. ĀęۺڷͿφèν

֢͠ݓÀѣԿࣅҼٮŔমęεҼİ३Ҏں˺, ɳşۺ ۍࠑϸقԴəŔԐڌÀɠՁۋ߿қॠɰČԦÁʽɰ.

̚ॢφèν֢͠ݓεѣԿࣅҼٮێ܁͟ঔ०ॠيԐڌ

ॢɰϸ, ѣԿࣅҼقԴߣşقڌ߻ʼəԜɾ͟ۆডԓّ

ȬʪݒÀεرɗ܁ʪÇՙ֨ࡈܶսەںӼ؉ɦ͆

ʌ ȭڹ܁জমڱںşʂॣ ս ەں ìۋɰ.

ĶՃࣀćٍ҃ق˰βϸ, φèν܃ܓϸॴսəۻĶۺ ڷͿ847Òۋ϶ۻĶۺڷͿҼİۺČβóқपʼرە ɰ(ĶՃߔ, 2011). ĀĶۋəφèν֢͠ݓεࠄ˛॥ق

ەرψڹۋ۾ۋەɰəìںϊ३ܵɰ. ̚ॢदşНں

ۋڌॠəìۋş˺Лقφèν֢͠ݓۆԐڌقەر

ą܃ۺ ۋ۾ʪܕۦॢɰ.

ɰχ, ٍ҆ĵĀęəbatch test ĀęͿ׆ٍ՚֬ॹˣ ںࣀॢ࣢ՁथÀÀۋΠ܋آ ॣ ìڷͿ ࣺɳʽɰ.

ԐԐ

֬ॹܵҼقʪړںܵÌڙʂॡİťʴ৅, ۋইܵ؁ƍ

ÇԐ˚ν϶, ٍĵę܁قüͲε؉Ǜݓ؍ڷ֪ॢĶݓݗ

ۙڙٍĵڙ ÌԜս, ÌܼԵ чԐɫƍ ÇԐ˚ςɦɰ.

޷ČЛॶ

֝প఻, 2011. 12. 27, www.nts.go.kr.

׌լ࠮, ෛ଀, ࢽฅ୺, 2008, “จॺસฅ଀ֹճ୨ฃ఼ۡࠜ

ଲ૳෉ॺনֈॺࢼ৤ళࠤ,” ۩෉ୀ଀ฅլ஺ா෈ฎ஺,୪ 41֫1෹, pp. 57-62.

׌૗থ, 2011, “Probiotic bacteriaଭ঍ୋ઩۩෉࠭Տࠤਉ ߇஺ଭଲ૳,”ړડր෈઴֜, ୪28֫3෹, pp. 473-477.

ੲஂ࠮, 2010, ෻෍କ׆ࢄாଡଲ૳෉ॺনֈॺࢼ৤ଭళ ࠤ઩ ւ෉઴֜, ֈ૶۩෈֗ ࢮॷ෈଍ڍࢂ, pp. 84-85.

ੲஂ࠮, ହ׊୍, ୨஼૽, ஺ঃ૴, ୨ઽ૵, ࢮ෮ন, ౖঃଵ,

2011, “ֈॺࢼ৤ୀ઴୨ฃਏডଭ۩఼׆ாࢄாୡ૳ন׆

ొ઴֜,”෉֝஺֜ਏਆഗվ෈ฎ஺,୪48֫2෹, pp. 34-44.

઱৤ฅ, ୨૳஼, 2010, “֝ٛ࠭Տࠤॺડଭ෮จրࢳୢ

ࢺੲ,” ਐඨր෈րॺડ, ୪43֫ 4෹, pp. 55-64.

૳࣪ઽ, ୺ܛ૗, ୨஼૽, ହ׊୍, ஺ঃ૴, ੲசন, ৉෹శ, 2010, “ֈॺࢼ৤ୀ઴୨ฃਏডٛ࣊দബणଭணׁুใ చۇߚඌԧ,”۩෉ୀ଀ฅլ஺ா෈ฎ஺,୪43֫1෹, pp.

13-20.

ହ׊୍, 2002, “ඍ೶ֈֈॺࢼ৤ୀ઴୨ฃਏড୨ฃตଘ

ඌԧॷߢ઴֜,”෉֝஺֜ਏਆഗվ෈ฎ஺,୪39֫2෹, pp. 112-118.

୨ઽ૵, ࢢ୨ਐ, ֫ֈ৤, ଲ෮ச, 1997, “ֈॺඍ৤୨ฃ૳

ী೿஺ଭ׆ாࢄாตଘনඌԧ-ਓ෠էրࠜணਕଞߦ-,”

෉֝ୀ଀վ෈ฎ஺, ୪34֫, pp. 142-151.

୨஼૽, 2011, କ׆ࢄ୺নंজଡଲ૳෉จॺસฅ଀ࢱଦ

୺׆ாࢄாตଘඌԧ, ౦ْ۩෈֗জॷ෈଍ڍࢂ, p. 70.

஺ঃ૴, 2004, ֝ٛॺনֈॺࢼ৤ୀ઴୨ฃਏডଭंজր

Ձٛจॺસฅ଀ਏডࡦ෴ਓ෠઴֜, ෉ઑ۩෈֗ࢮॷ

෈଍ ڍࢂ, p. 154.

஺ঃ૴, ୨ઽ૵, 2005, “ॺনֈॺࢼ৤ߦૈસܤ஺෇৤୨

ฃ૳റ৤নࢱଦ఼࣠ࢱଦ࠻ாট୨׆ొਓ෠,”ୀ଀ฅ

լ஺ா, ୪38֫ 3෹, pp. 237-245.

ౖট็, 2009, ਉ߇஺ߦऀഉंࠤ෉৤ী঍নֹS-1ଭ৤

ী঍ন൉নրୡ૳ตր઩ւ෉઴֜, ܛੰ۩෈֗জॷ

෈଍ڍࢂ, p. 2.

ധծ఻, 2011. 11. 15, www.kostat.go.kt.

Amos, P.W. and Younger, P.L., 2003, “Substrate characterization for a subsurface reactive barrier to treat colliery spoil leachate,” Water Res., Vol. 37, pp. 108-120.

Béchard, S., Yamazaki, H., Gould, W.D. and Bédard, P., 1994, “Use of cellulosic substrates for the microbial treatment of acid mine drainage,” J. Environ. Qual., Vol. 23, pp.

111-116.

Choudhary, R.P. and Sheoran, A.S., 2011, “Comparative study of cellulose waste versus organic waste as substrate in a sulfate reducing bioreactor,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 102, pp. 4319-4324.

Christensen, B., Laake, M. and Lien, T., 1996, “Treatment of acid mine water by sulfate-reducing bacteria; results from a bench scale experiment,” Water Research, Vol. 30,

pp. 1617-1624.

Cocos, I.A., Zagury, G.J., Clement, B. and Samson, R., 2002, “Multiple factor design for reactive mixture selection for use in reactive walls in acid mine drainage treatment,”

Water Res., Vol. 36, pp. 167-177.

Dvorak, D.H., Hedin, R.S., Edenborn, H.M. and McIntire, P.E., 1992, “Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: results from pilot-scale reactors,”

Biotechnol. Bioeng., Vol. 40, pp. 609-616.

(8)

ࢽฅ୺

ইۦ Ìڙʂॡİ ėęʂॡ قȃݓۙڙėॡę İս (欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧47嘳G 缧3埲G 垾畢)

׌լ࠮

ইۦ Ìڙʂॡİ ʂॡڙ قȃݓۙڙėॡę чԐę܁

(欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧47嘳G 缧3埲G 垾畢)

׌۩ผ

ইۦ Ìڙʂॡİ ʂॡڙ قȃݓۙڙėॡę чԐę܁

(欧G 彳櫾躇G 缧47嘳G 缧3埲G 垾畢)

Gibert, O., Pablo, J.D., Cortina, J.J and Ayora, C., 2004,

“Chemical characterisation of natural organic substrates for biological mitigation of acid mine drainage,” Water Res., Vol. 38, pp. 4186-4196.

Gusek, J.J., Wildeman, T.R. and Miller, A., 1999, Design, construction and operation of a 1,200 gpm passive bioreactor for metal mine drainage, in: Phytoremediation and innovative strategies for specialized remedial applications, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp. 217-223.

Ji, S.W., Kim, S.J. and Ko, J.I., 2008, “ The status of the passive treatment systems for acid mine drainage in South Korea,” Environ. Geol., Vol. 55, pp. 1181-1194.

Johnson, D.B. and Hallberg, K.B., 2002, “Pitfalls of passive mine water treatment: Reviews,” Environmental Science Bio-Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 335-343.

Johnson, D.B. and Hallberg, K.B., 2005, “Acid mine drainage remediation options: A review,” Science of the Total Environmental, Vol. 338, pp. 3-14.

Neculita, C.M., Yim, G.J., Lee, G.Y., Ji, S.W., Jung, J.W., Park, H.S. and Song, H.C., 2011, “Comparative effectiveness of mixed organic substrates to mushroom compost for treatment of mine drainage in passive bioreactors,”

Chemosphere, Vol. 83, pp. 76-82.

Okabe, S., Nielsen, P.H. and Characklis, W.G., 1992, “Factors affecting microbial sulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio desul- furicans in continuous culture: limiting nutrients and sulfide concentration,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., Vol. 40, pp.

725-734.

Postgate, J.R., 1984, The sulphate-reducing bacteria, 2nd edition, Cambridge Univ. Press, NY, p. 208.

Prasad, D., Wai, M., Berube, P. and Henry, J.G., 1999,

“Evaluating substrates in the treatment of acid mine drainage,” Environ. Technol., Vol. 20, pp. 449-459.

Teclu, D., Tivchev, G., Laing, M. and Wallis, M, 2009,

“Determination of the elemental composition of molasses and its suitability as carbon source for growth of sulphate- reducing bacteria,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.

161, pp. 1157-1165.

Waybrant, K.R., Blowes, D.W. and Ptacek, C.J., 1998,

“Selection of reactive mixtures for use in permeable reactive walls for treatment of mine drainage,” Environ.

Sci. Technol, Vol. 32, pp. 1972-1979.

Zagury, G.J., Kulnieks, V.I. and Neculita, C.M., 2006,

“Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment,” Chemosphere, Vol. 64, pp. 944-954.

Zagury, G.J. and Neculita, C.M., 2008, “Biological treatment of highly contaminated acid mine drainage in batch reactors: Long-term treatment and reactive mixture characterization,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.

157, pp. 358-366.

수치

Table 2. Composition of synthetic AMD in batch test
Table 4. Characterization of organic materials
Fig. 3. Changes in amount of removed sulfate.
Fig. 4. Changes in Fe, Al and Cu concentration over time  in batch test.ćԓʽঞڙ՚ʪəڼۆÉۋࡾϸࢁս΀ȭڹ՚ʪεۆйॢɰ

참조

관련 문서

Key words: kimchi storage period, heat treatment, nisin, yucca extract, lactic acid bacteria.. †

Key words: Agastache rugosa, fermented yakchobugak, waxy rice paste, lactic acid bacteria, quality properties.. † Corresponding

The sludge from the treatment process of Acid Mine Drainage mainly consists of fine iron hydroxide or iron oxide hydrate and calcite, and the fine iron hydroxide or iron

(2013) A study on the application of manganese oxidizing bacteria for manganese treatment in acid mine drainage.. (2019) Characteristics of removal and precipitation of heavy

Key words: dry farming soil, phylogenetic tree, rice paddy soil, sulfate reducing bacteria,

Key words : Acid mine drainage, Yellow colored iron hydroxide, Sheathed-filament structure, Rod-shaped indigenous bacteria.. 요 약 : 도계 삼마-태정 폐탄광에

Elliott, P., Ragusa, S., and Catcheside, D., 1998, “Growth of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria under Acidic Conditions in an Upflow Anaerobic Bioreactor as a Treatment System for Acid

Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage Using Immobilized Beads Carrying Sulfate Reducing Bacteria.. Gyoung Man Kim 1 , Won Hur 2 and Hwan Jo Baek