• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

A NOTE ON F-CLOSED SPACES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "A NOTE ON F-CLOSED SPACES "

Copied!
5
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Volume 31, Numbcr 2, Dccember, 1991

A NOTE ON F-CLOSED SPACES

Takashi Noirl

1.

Introduction

In 1969

,

Porter and Thomas [12] defined a topological space X to be quasi H-closed if every open cover of X has a fìnite prox:imate subcover.

A family of sets whose union is dense in X is called a proximate cover of X. Recently

,

Chae and Lee [2] have introduced and studied the concept of F-closed spaces by utilizing feebly open sets due to Maheshwari and Ta.pi [6]. A topologica.l spa.ce X is sa.id to be F-closed [2] if every feebly open covcr of X ha.s a finite proxima.te subcover. The ma.in purpose of the present note is to show tha.t the F-closed property is equiva.lent to the qua.si H -closed property

2 . Preliminaries

Throughout the present note

,

spa.ces a.lwa.ys mea.n topologica.1 spaces on which no separa.tion axioms a.re assumed Let A be a subset of a space X. The closurc and the interior of A are denoted by CI(A) and Int(A), re- spcctively. A subset A is said to be pπopen [9] (resp. semi-open [5]

,

a-open

[1 이) if A C 1띠 (CI(A)) (resp. A C CI(1nt(A)), A C Int(CI(Int(A)))) The complement of a preopen (resp. semi-open, a-open) set is said to be p

,

"eclosed (resp. se씬m1

sc야ts of

X

containing A is ca.lled the seml

by sCαl(“A씨). A subset A is said to be Jeebly open [6] if there exists an open set U of X such that U

c

A C sC l( U). The following property is shown in [11

,

Lemma 3.1]

Lemma 2.1. A subsel oJ a space X is a-open in X iJ and only iJ it is semi-open and preopen in X

3. Quasi H-closed spaces

269

(2)

Lemma 3.1. If A is a pπopen sel of a space X, then CI(Int(CI(A))) = CI(A) and sCI(A) = Jnl(CI(A))

Proof The first part is obvious and the second follows from sCI(A) = A

u

Int(CI(A)) [1

,

Thcorem l.5]

Lemma 3.2. A subsel A of a space X is feeblν open in X if and only if il is c<-open in X

P1"00f Let A be feebly open in X. There exists an open set U of X such

that U ζ A C sCI(U). Since U

c

lnl(A) and sCI(U) = Int(CI(U)) by Lemma 3.1, we have A C Int(CI(I떠 (A))) and hence A is c<-open in X Conversely

,

let A be c<-open in X. We have A C Int(CI(fnt(A))) and hencc Int(A) C A C sCI(Int(A)). Thcrcfore

,

A is feebly open in X

Definition 3.3. A space X is said to be F-c/osed [2] if every feebly open cover of X has a finite proximate subcover.

Theorem 3.4. The following an

,

equivalenl for a space X (a)

X

is Jè-closed

(b)

X

is quasi

H

-c/osed.

(c) Every preopen cover of X has a finile proximate subcovel

‘·

(d) F01' each family {Jèalc< E \7} of pl'eclosed sels in X salisfying n{Falc< E \7} =

ø

, lhel"e exisls a fìnile subset \70 of\7 such lhal n{Jnt(Fa)

I

c< E \70} =

0.

Proof (a) =} (b) The proof is obvious since every opcn set is feebly open

(b) =} (c) : Let {Valc< E \7} be a cover of X by preopen sets of X

For each c< E \7, Va C Jnl(CI(Va)) and {lnl(CI( κ))

I

c< E \7} is an OpCIl

cover of X. There cxists a finite subset \70 of \7 such that X = U{CI(Int(CI(Va)))Ic< E \70}.

By Lemma 3.1

,

we obtain X = U{CI(VQ)Ic< E \70}

(c) =} (d) and (d) =} (a) : These follow easily from Lemmas 2.1 and 3.2.

Rema1.k 3.5. By Thcorem 3.4, we obscrve that Example 4.1 of [2] is false since ßN x ßN is compact.

A subsct A of a space X is said to be F -c/osed relative 10 X [2] (rcsp quasi H -closed l'elalive 10 X [12]) if for cvery cover {Valc< E \7} of A by feebly open (resp. opcn) sets of X, there exists a finitc subsct \70 of \7 such that A C U{CI(Va)lc< E \70}

(3)

Theorem 3.6. A subset A of a space X is F-c/osed relative to X if and only if it is quasi H -c/osed ,.e1ative to X.

Proof Suppose that A is quasi H-closed relative to X. Let {V"la E \7} be a cover of A by feebly open sets of X. By Lemma 3.2

,

{Jnt( C l(Int(V,,))) la E

\7} is a cover of A by open sets of X. There exists a fìnite subset \70 of

\7 such that A C U{CI(Int(V,,))la E \70}. By Lemmas 2.1 and 3.2

,

V" is semi-open and hence CI(Int(V,,)) = CI(V,,) for each a E \7. Therefore

,

we have A

c

u{ CI(V,,) la E \7 o}. The converse is obvious since every open set is feebly open

It was pointed out in [12

,

p. 161J that every quasi H-closed subspace is quasi H-closed relative to the space but not conversely. 1n [2

,

Theorcm 2.2J

,

Chae and Lee showed that a feebly open subspace of a space X is F- c10sed if and only if it is F-closed relative to X. The following theorem is a slight improvement of this result since every feebly open set is preopen

Theorem 3.7. Let A be a pπopen set 0 f a space X The subspace A is quasi H -c/osed if and only if A is quasi H -c/osed relative to X

Proof Suppose that A is preopen in X and quasi H-closed relative to X Let {V"la E \7} be a cover of A by open sets of the subspace A. For each a E \7, there exists an opcn set W" of X such that V" =

w" n

A. Since A is preopen in X, we have

V"

c

W"nlnt(CI(A)) = Jnt(W"nCI(A)) C lnt(CI(W,띠 A)) = Int(CI(V,,))

Therefore

,

V" is

pre이)en

in X and {lnt(CI(V,,))la E \7} is a cover of A by open sets of X By Lemma 3.1

,

there exists a fìnite subset \70 of \7 such that A C U{CI(V,,)la E \70}. Therefore

,

we obtain

A = U{CI(V,,)

n

Ala E \7o} = u{CIA(V,,)la E \70}

,

where CIA(V,,) denotes the closure of V" in the subspace A. This shows that A is qu 앓 i H-c1osed

A function f : X • Y is said to be c

ontinuous [8J (resp. a-irresolute [7]) if f-l(V) is a-open in X for every open (resp. a-open) set V of Y By Lemma 3.2

,

a-continllity (resp. a-irresolllteness) is equivalent to feeble continuity (resp. feeble irresolllteness) due to Chae and Lee [2J. A function f:X Y is said to be O-continuous [4J if for

e않ac마h

x E X and

e않ac이h

open n

set V containin

fμ(CαI(ψU띠))

c

CI(V)

(4)

Rema1'k 3.8. FOI" the properties on a function

f :

X Y, the following implicatio따 are known in [7] and [8]:

a - irresolutcness

contínuíty

/

a - continuity =} 0 - continuity

Lemma 3.9. 1f f : X Y is O-conlinuous and A is quasi H -c/osed

,

'elalive 10 X, then f(A) is quasi H-c/osed relalive to Y Pmof The proof is obvious and is thus omitted.

Corollary 3.10 (Chae and Lee [2]). Let X be an F-c/osed space and f:X Y a function. Then

,

the following properlies hold

(a) If f is a feebly coηlin uous surjeclion, then Y ;s quas! fl-c/osed (b) If f ;s a fccbly irresolule surjeclion

,

lhen Y is F -c/oscd

(c) Jf f is fecbly irresolute and Y is HallsdorjJ, then f(X) ;s c/osed in Y

Proof (a) and (b) are immediate conscqucnccs ofTheorem 3.4 and Lemllla 3.9. (c) follows from Theorem 3.4, Lemma 3.9 and the fact that if B i~ qu잃 i 11 -c1osed relative to Y and Y is J1ausdorff thcn B is c1o~ed in Y

References

[1] D. Andrìjecvié, Semi-]Jreopcn se“, Mat. Vesnik 38(1986), 24-32

[2] Gyuihn Chae ancl Dowon Lce, F-closed sl

,

aecs, Kyllngpook Math .. J. 27(1987),

127-134

[3] S. G. Cr∞sley and S. K. Hildebrand, Senll-closu π , Texas JSci. 22 (1971), 99-112 [4] S. F'omin, E

,

:te"slO"s oJ topolog

,

eal spaces, Ann. of Math. 44(1943), 471-480

[이 N. Levinc, Se1'llt-01>C1l .sets and sem i.-contmu 씨 in lopologlcal s]Jaces, A mer. M ath Monthly 70 (1963), 36-41

[6] S. N. Maheshwari and U. D. Tapi, Note 011 some applzeat

,

olls oJ Jeebly ol

,

en sets,

M. ß. J. Univ. ofSaugar (toappear)

[7] S. N. Maheshwari and S. S. Thakur, 011 ()-;,,-csolute ma1'pmgs, Tamkang J. Math 11(1980),209-214

(5)

[8] A. S. Mashhour, 1. A. Hasanein and S. N. EI-Deeb, a-continuous and a-open mappings, Acta Math. Hung. 41(1983), 213-218

[9] A. S. Mashhour, M. E. Abd EI-Monsef and S. N. EI-Deeb, On pπcontinuous and weak pπcontinuous mappings, Proc. Math. Phys. Soc. Egypt 53(1982), 47-53 [1이 o. Njåstad, 0" some c/asses of nearly open sets, Pacific J. Math. 15(1965),961

970

[ll] T. Noiri, On a-continuous functions, ëasopis Pèst. Mat. 109 (1984), 118-126 [12] J. Porter and J. Thomas, On H -c/osed and minimal H -c/osed spaces, Trans. A mer

Math. Soc. 138(1969), 159-170

YATSUSHIRO COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, YATSUSHIRO, KUMAMOTO, 866 JAPAN

참조

관련 문서

The purpose of this research is to deduce present condition and problem of play space through the Actual Condition Analysis of domestic Play Space.. This study

An operator T on a complex Hilbert space H is called skew symmetric if T can be represented as a skew symmetric matrix relative to some orthonormal basis for H.. In this note,

On the basis of this special Randers change, the purpose of the present paper is devoted to studying the conditions for Finsler space F n which are transformed by a special

The purpose in'this paper is first to extend the selection theorem in [1] to closed valued lower semicontinuous maps with V-set values in a complete LD-metric space except possibly on

For a given prime p and a generalized Brieskorn sphere L:a' define a free cyclic ZFaction on L:a as follows: Choose natural numbers bj so that aijbj=h (mod p), h*O for all i, j..

This theorem suggests that it is possible to study a Finsler space M with the absolute parallelism of Cartan by the method of the Riemannian geometry only.. The principal purpose of

THEOREM 1.. A two-dimensional Finsler space with the Kropina metric L= u.z/ 3 is a Landsberg space if and only if b1+ibz is a complex analytic function of th; v~riable x 1 +ix 2 ...

The object of this note is to extend a theorem of F.Bagemihl Cl~. Let CrCf,p) denote the radial cluster set of a function fez) at the point p on the unit circle. Bage- mihl has