Characteristics of Residual Ozone Decomposition with Commercial Ozone Decomposition Catalyst (ODC) and Photo catalyst
전체 글
(2) · · † *. *. Characteristics of Residual Ozone Decomposition with Commercial Ozone Decomposition Catalyst (ODC) and Photo catalyst Jeong-Hoon Byeon, Jae-Hong Park, Jung-Ho Hwang Key Words :. Ozone Decomposition Catalyst (ODC), Photo catalyst, Ozone Decomposition () Abstract. Decomposition of ozone at room temperature was investigated comparatively with commercial monolithic ozone decomposition catalyst (ODC, MnO2) and monolithic photo catalyst (TiO2). The effects of residence time, UV (ultraviolet) light dependence and ozone concentration on the conversion was presented. UV ray was irradiated using BLB (black light blue) lamp (315~400 nm), supplied with a constant intensity in the reactor. The concentration of ozone in the square-shape reactor can be controlled by combining the DBD (dielectric barrier discharge) reactor with an AC high voltage supply system. The catalytic performance, in presence of UV irradiation did not show significant changes for MnO2 catalyst. TiO2 catalyst was the different case, which showed higher decomposition activity in presence of UV irradiation. Deactivation of catalyst detected by real – time ozone monitor for 120 hours with a constant inlet ozone concentration.. 1.. . . ozone
(3) !"#$%&'volatile organic compounds, VOCs () odor * +$,'-.,/012'-345 67 89:; <=>nonthermal plasma?31,+$, '-@ ABCDE 3F 3+G/HIJKheadacheLM Nthroat drynessOPQ+mucous membrane damageRSlung cancer*TUV@W4 X YZ[ \4 ]^ _` abFc U.S. food and drug administrationdefg * †. .
(4) , , E-mail : [email protected] TEL : (02)2123-2821 FAX : (02)312-2159. h,/"ij@ 3 ^] f X\4 kl mno pqr
(5)
(6) s3:tuv wx y* p 0zpt^{|electrical discharge process^ }+i~ A \ 3 .34 p0 zp f "i
(7) ^ 3d4 O2 + e - e - + O + O O2 + O + M O3 + M. (1) (2). a . O2 p , ~# O^ , 2 @ _ X
(8) a., ^i#~# .] '-H O33 i#2@_f4 i # '-^zpp'-*@ f4 }0^ + DE (residual ozone)@ ] 012 z @ 7¡¢4.. 1255.
(9) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. . ., BC * , XG/ 1001400 ppmNM,á/2¢4 È /I %' ¼½^ Ò¿ "#$ NÓ,pelectronhole 3i#2¼½#'-3®AÂ3 4 4. Table 1 Methods for treatment of residual ozone Phase. Gaseous Ozone. Method Adsorption with AC Catalytic Decomposition Thermal Decomposition Bath Washing Soil Decomposition. £^@.,ABC£f¤ #3
(10) ¥ ¦^ §¨©? ª6 ~#« * ¬ (adsorption) BC ®i ¯°f ±I f ²] \,(5) (14) ³´.,(15) BC µ ]¶· ¸¹ ¤# _º» f ²] \4. ¼½? 31f ] z BC ¾# + @ ¿À0^ ] X #.I i #'^ 2 Á ² Ã/ ¶·3 Ä $Å BC UÆ0H ]Ç3 Å \ 4@] ¼½Ç}0^01 2¼½ È/I%'^
(11) * ɲ]#Ê3 4¹¼½Ë,gC@ Ì0^ » k¢4. ? .,¼½ ., 4. (10) O3 + 2* O2* + O* O2* + * 2 O* 2O* O 2 + 2*. (3) (4) (5). a3¼½~# ~# .O2*~#O*^, 2 @_ X!a ai#~# .¼½~#active site J Í~#^, 2@_ a !aJÍ~#~#. 2d 7.^2@_f4 @ ] ¼½Ç^ μ½photocatalystfÏÆ/rÐ2X\ 4 μ½ Ç .,¼½ ozone decomposition catalyst, ODC>Ñ^¼½ f ] Ç3 ¼½ Ò¿ ultraviolet ray@NÓ Ô@¼½~# ~#%2d %Õ3 3dr4 36f μ ½Ç k^ÖB.ר -
(12) ' -ÙÚTy$,|]ÛÜ Ý 36| Ý3d^Þ bioaerosol ] /012X\4 μ½ Ò ¿ ß&2d à® }0^ Ó14 . hv 3.2 eV. TiO2. h+ + e(6) e + O3 O3 (7) h+ + OH- OH (8) O3- + O3 O4- + O2 (9) OH + O3 O4- + H+ (10) O4- + O3 2O2 + O3(11) (12) H+ + O3- + O4- 3 O2 + OH(6)a ¼½ Ò¿ , p ^ , 2 3X, (7)a (6)a i# p â3;@ i# 3, (8)a (6)a i# 3 ãäå (hydroxyl group) ãäå æç (radical)3 i#2 34. (9)a (7)a i# â3;3 O4 â3; . i#2 3X, (10)a (8)a i# ãäå æç 3 O4 â3; 3;3 i #2 34. (11)a (9) (10)a i# O4 â3;3 J Í . â3;@ È# 3X, (12)a (9) (10)a i# 3;, O4 â3; (11) 3;3 3 Í . ãä^^ pÖ2 ., èß @ _f4. pI éê 3 A \4. hv 3.2 eV. 2O3. 3O2. (13). TiO2. ë ÏÆ +ì0^ ]í-î½2 ©ï |È (monolithic shape) .,¼½ (MnO2) μ½ (TiO2) \d ] ð#Ê gáñ ò f #Êl% f ¾#@ Ì 0^ ºH Ô4.. 2..
(13). ëÏÆ]\d}0H .,¼½,3%óñMnO23© ï |ÈY_7aluminaôIsupporter/bed. 1256.
(14) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. Table 2 Basic Information of Catalysts Size of Catalys t Bed (L*W* D, cm3). Mesh Size (#/in). Bed Material. Preparation Method. Additives (absorber). MnO2. 5*5*4.5. 14. Alumina. Impregnation. -. TiO2. 5*5*4.5. 10. Inorganic Paper. ImpregnationCoating. Activated Carbon, Zeolite. ôimpregnatedBCf ÔXμ½ ,3%õ¡öTiO23~#«] ÷3ø ù] ú ©ï |È ûè3 inorganic paperôIô8üýþ33 drBCf Ô4. ¼½ pIj3 1 3 X A Â, .,¼½ BC 1 3 ©J 3, μ½ BC TiO2, ~#«, ]÷3ø Ë·3 0.2, 0.5, 0.3 3¢4. 36f ÌNM + ì0^ ]í$î½2.,¼½Î¼½ f}0H¾#@ ]b 7@ XZ Ô Â²34 3 3 XZ ¼½ 0&f]Nz ^]íf¼½ fð » 7¡¢4 % 3Ìgh?Æ# Ô4. (compressor)7;}ø (oil trap) $jN regulator? K X 8 ºM N diffusion dryer HEPA (high efficiency particulate filter)^ Æ# % á| (air filtering system)@ Kf4 % á|@ Kfc% &'( # ' !!)*,$j3 + ^ N4 N $j 3 , - HzÈ ø^$
(15) 2d%'()## ?K X } ^pÖ4"ij "i function generator Ïß ./ alternating current Xp "i high voltage generator$pIm dzpp^ IEáñ ¸ 0&f G/? Hp kÙÙÈ*@l%á N Ô4"i ¼½ ø^ $
(16) 2d .,2 ¼½ ø?KfG/B3 +0H < t^ sampling probe? K, 1 $j^ 2¢4 .,¶· áñ©vReal-Time Ozone Monitor, Porta Sens 2, Ati@a^Æ Ô4 (14a//¼½ ø $
(17) G/¼½ ø? KfG/? . Fig. 1 Experimental Set-up _f4@K,» Ó1 Ô 2 Á G/? ^ JX 3 @
(18) $ m^ c^ Ë, å Ô4åf3v. η O Conversion (%) = (1 − 3. Co ) × 100 Ci. (14). ^v»a@8]Ì2 5a@01 @ Ô4 $ }Â $ }Â3 regression coefficient44 3¢4 ¼½ ø Ä3 ©J 50 mm 3 X, ø È+ % 7¡ B 3 15.5 mm 134.5 mm H 56 t (BLB, 315-400 nm, 4W, F4T5BLB, Sankyo)? ø? K 4 ^ m£2X 56 t C ¼½ m£2d \4. 56 t po 220V AC p ^ ¤? K, } /å Ô4. ¼½
(19) 7¡ ©ï |È ¼ ½ 3 (depth, D) 1/5 m 0.9 cm ^ 5 Í ^ 7 d 56 t ? 2.2 cm ^ $ Ô 4. ¼½ 56 t Fluent 6.1 @ 31 Ì 012 IEáñ g ! 0.0375 - ($j = 180 lpm) BC , $òg @ , ß Ô4. .,¶· ,¼½? K IEáñ ? 7 - - ^$j^ +lpm lpm" 56 H$
(20) G/?l^ Ô4Ìl# áñ .3+$/8 ^$ Ô4. 1257.
(21) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. 3.. 100. 3.1 UV ë ÏÆ +ì1 .,¼½ μ½ .,¾#@ % \d k&l? X 56 NÓ NM ¼½ IEáñ@ l%á 56 t? on, off '@ Â, G/ ? 5 30 ppm ^ N ^ Ô4. I Eáñ3 0.0375 sec 1.35 sec H N M G/ 5 30 ppm }  . ,¶· F 1 15 % F 0.4 11 %^ 2¢4. IEáñ ( ¸ .,¶· ¿È0^ ( BV@ »ÔX, G/ µ NM #Ê3 IEáñ3 H BC F 0.6 4 %/ Äâ@ ºH Ô4.. Ozone Conversion (%). 90 UV off (TiO_2). 80. UV on (TiO_2). 70. UV off (MnO_2) UV on (MnO_2). 60 50 40 30 0.0100. 0.1000. 1.0000. 10.0000. Residence Time (sec). Fig. 3 Initial Ozone Conversion (at 5 ppm) 3.2
(22) % %! G/? ^N Ô@Â56tpoH ¸¹¼½#.,¶·@7¡¢4% ßμ½BC.,¼½ Ë,56 NÓf.,¶·Í¿3IE áñ)¸F8/Í¿*@º HA\¢4 %! ß % ß $Óf BV @ »Ô4. IEáñ3 0.225 - »4 + BC \d % BC»4 ¼½ñ #Ê,3 F. 100. Ozone Conversion (%). 80. Ozone Conversion (%). In l e t O 3 C once n trati on (ppm ) 5 30. UV on (TiO_2) UV off (MnO_2). 40. UV on (MnO_2). 0 0.0100. 0.1000. 1.0000. 10.0000. Residence Time (sec). 10. Fig. 4 Initial Ozone Conversion (At 30 ppm). 5. 0 0.0100. UV off (TiO_2). 20. 20. 15. 60. 0.1000. 1.0000. 10.0000. Re si de n ce Ti m e (se c). Fig. 2 Ozone Conversion with UV irradiation (At 293 K, BLB lamp). 8 %/ ( Ô4. .,¼½ BC % ß >Ñ^ UV NÓ .,¶· Í¿3 3d Á-4. μ½ B C IEáñ3 0.135 - ? W^ IEáñ3 + BC UV t poH ¸¹ ¶· Í¿3 % Ë, F 15 % / ( ÔX, IEáñ3 ! BC % ß ò} Ô4. IEáñ)¸¹¼½# #Ê,3 % BC IEáñ3 . 1258.
(23) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. oH¸¹¼½#gáñ
(24) áñ .,¶·¾#@7¡¢456 ?NÓ Á BC ¼½.,¶·: ¿ . 100. Ozone Conversion (%). 90. / $9 3X ¼½ BC $7 ^F9 m/¼½Ä-49f56 ? NÓf BC ¼½ .,¶· : ¿ / $ 3X ¼½ BC $
(25) ! ^F+m/¼½Ä-4% 9 ß 56 ? NÓ Á BC ¼½ .,¶· : ¿ / $
(26) 7 3X¼½BC$7 ^F! m/ ¼½ Ä-4 9f 56 ? NÓf BC ¼½ .,¶· : ¿ / $
(27) 3X ¼½ BC $
(28) ^ F m/¼½Ä-4. 80. UV off-TiO_2. 70. UV on-TiO_2 UV off-MnO_2. 60. UV on-MnO_2. 50 0. 2000. 4000. 6000. 8000. O pe rati on Ti m e (m i n ). Fig. 5 Long-term Ozone Conversion (At 5 ppm) (RT = 0.225sec, 120 hours operation). 4.. 100.0. ëÏÆ+ì1.,¼½MnO2¬ - ù] μ½ TiO2? 31 DEðgáñ
(29) áñ.,¾ #@Ì@K, XX0 Ô4 OXPG 56NÓf.,¶·IEáñ3 7 - - HNM G/ }  F 8F! 8^2¢4G G OYPG G/ù]? f μ ½BC56tpoH,.,¶ ·3 8/Í¿2¢4 .,¼½ BCG/ HNM©J56 . UV off-Ti O _2 UV on -Ti O _2. 90.0 Ozone Conversion (%). UV off-MnO _2 UV on -Mn O _2 80.0. 70.0. 60.0. 50.0 0. 2000. 4000 6000 Operation Time (min). . 8000. Fig. 6 Long-term Ozone Conversion (At 30 ppm) (RT = 0.225 sec, 120 hours Operation). -»4!BC56poHû .,¼½Î¼½Ë,¶·3µ. %! BC% 3¼½#¶· ,3F8/^ò} 7IEáñ 3
(30)
(31) -»4!BCv.,¼½ μ½¶·»4µ.4 3.3
(32) % %9 G/ HBCIEáñ3
(33)
(34) - 56 tp. G t poH ¸¹ ¶· l% 1¢4 (3) G/ 3X IEáñ3
(35)
(36) -HBC56 ?NÓ Á-@¼ ½.,¶·: ¿/$9 3 X ¼½ BC $7 ^ F 9 m/
(37) ¼½ Ä-4 9f 56 ? NÓf BC ¼½ .,¶· : ¿ / $ 3X¼½BC$
(38) ! ^F+ m/¼½Ä-4G/ 3XIEáñ3
(39)
(40) -HBC56 ?NÓ Á-@¼½.,¶·: ¿. 1259.
(41) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. / $
(42) 7 3X ¼½ BC $ 7 ^F! m/¼½Ä-49 f56 ?NÓfBC¼½.,¶·: ¿ / $
(43) 3X ¼½ BC$
(44) ^Fm/¼½Ä4. 3ɲÖBo ,{23ÖB Ç]]°4:
(45) $
(46) $9ìo o K23ÇÍ" ]]°4:
(47) $
(48) $++ o2d3)Óäu 4. (1) Lin, J., Kawai, A. and Nakajima, T., 2002, “Effective Catalysts for Decomposition of Aqueous Ozone,” Applied Catalyst B: Environmental, Vol. 39, Issue 2, pp. 1~2. (2) Hsu, Y. C., Yang, H. C. and Chen, J. H., 2001, "Decolorization of Dyes Using Ozone in a GasInduced Reactor," AlChe Journal, Vol. 47, Issue 1, pp. 169~176. (3) Pengyi, Z., Fuyan, L., Gang, Y., Qing, C. and Wanpeng, Z., 2003, “A Compartive Study on Decomposition of Gaseous Toluene by O3/UV, TiO2/UV and O3/TiO2/UV,” J. of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, Vol. 156, pp. 189~194. (4) Sekiguchi, K., Sanada, A. and Sakamoto, K., 2003, "Degradation of Toluene with an OzoneDecomposition Catalyst in the Presence of Ozone, and the Combined Effect TiO2 Addition," Catalysis Communications, Vol. 4, pp. 247~252. (5) Mills, A., Lee, S. K. and Lepre, A., 2003, "Photodecomposition of Ozone Sensitised by a Film of Titanium Dioxide on Glass," J. of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, Vol. 155, pp. 199~205. (6) Dorsey, J. A. and Davidson, J. H., 1994, "Ozone Production in Electrostatic Air Cleaners with Contaminated Electrodes," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 370~376. (7) Liu, L., Guo, J., Li, J. and Sheng, L., 2000, "The Effect of Wire Heating and Configuration on Ozone Emission in a Negative Ion Generator," J. of Electrostatics, Vol. 48, pp. 81~91. (8) Tanasomwang, T. and Lai, F. C., 1997, "Long-Term Ozone Generation from Electrostatic Air Cleaners," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications Annual Meeting, pp. 2037~2044. (9) Niu, J. L., Tung, T. C. W. and Burnett, J., 2001, "Quantification of Dust Removal and Ozone Emission of Ionizer Air-Cleaners by Chamber Testing," J. of. Electrostatics, Vol. 51-52, pp. 20~24. (10) Dhandapani, B., and Oyama, S. T., 1997, "Gas Phase Ozone Decomposition Catalysts," Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Vol. 11, pp. 129~166. (11) Ohkubo, T., Hamasaki, S., Nomoto, Y., Chang, J. and Adachi, T., 1990, "The Effect of Corona Wire Heating on the Downstream Ozone Concentration Profiles in an Air-Cleaning Wire-Duct Electrostatic Precipitator," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 542~549. (12) Viner, A. S., Lawless, P. A., Ensor, D. S. and Sparks, L. E., 1992, "Ozone Generation in DC-Energized Electrostatic Precipitators," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 504~512. (13) Rice, R. G. and Netzer, A., 1982, “Handbook of Ozone Technology and Applications,” Ann Arbor Science, Vol. 1. (14) Park, H. S., Hwang, T. M., Kang, J. W., Choi, H. and Oh, H. J., 2001, “Characterization of Raw Water for the Ozone Application Measuring Ozone Consumption Rate,” Wat. Res., Vol. 35, No. 11, pp. 2607~2614. (15) Lim, H. N., Choi, H., Hwang, T. M. and Kang, J. W., 2002, “Characterization of Ozone Decomposition in a Soil Slurry: Kinetics and Mechanism,” Wat. Res., Vol. 36, pp. 219-229. ~ (16) Villasenor, J., Reyes, P. and Pecchi, G., 2002, “Catalytic and Photocatalytic Ozonation of Phenol on MnO2 Supported Catalysts,” Catalysis Today, Vol. 76, pp. 121~131. (17) Ollis, D. F., 2000, “Photocatalytic Purification and Remediation of Contaminated Air and Water,” Surface Chemistry and Catalytics, Vol. 3, pp. 405~411.. 1260.
(49)
관련 문서
K., "Hydrogen production by catalytic decomposition of methane over activated carbons: kinetic study", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol...
• Controlled decomposition of organic materials such as plant materials, animal waste, food.. waste, and wastewater sludge
Partial Least Squares or Projection to Latent Structures [PLS].1. LU decomposition or other methods
Figure 14 Shift of Fabry-Pérot fringe pattern (left) and quenching PL spectra (right) of Cu(II)-TMEDA catalyst coated PPS under the exposure of TEP vapors... Figure
4.3 Gauss Elimination with Pivoting 4.4 Gauss‐Jordan Elimination Method 4.5 LU Decomposition Method. 4.6
In this study, a fine Ce 3 Al 11 phase catalyst was synthesized by mechanochemical reaction and the influence of the catalyst on the NaAlH 4 hydrogen storage properties
Decomposition (MOD) process, and then the zinc oxide nanorods on ZnO seed layer were grown by hydrothermal process from 0.3 M at pH 7, 80 ℃ , 1 h. Single phase zinc oxide
Drineas et al., Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices III: Com puting a Compressed Approximate Matrix Decomposition, SIAM Journal on Computing,