• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Characteristics of Residual Ozone Decomposition with Commercial Ozone Decomposition Catalyst (ODC) and Photo catalyst

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Characteristics of Residual Ozone Decomposition with Commercial Ozone Decomposition Catalyst (ODC) and Photo catalyst"

Copied!
6
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집.    

(2)    ·  · † *. *. Characteristics of Residual Ozone Decomposition with Commercial Ozone Decomposition Catalyst (ODC) and Photo catalyst Jeong-Hoon Byeon, Jae-Hong Park, Jung-Ho Hwang Key Words :. Ozone Decomposition Catalyst (ODC), Photo catalyst, Ozone Decomposition () Abstract. Decomposition of ozone at room temperature was investigated comparatively with commercial monolithic ozone decomposition catalyst (ODC, MnO2) and monolithic photo catalyst (TiO2). The effects of residence time, UV (ultraviolet) light dependence and ozone concentration on the conversion was presented. UV ray was irradiated using BLB (black light blue) lamp (315~400 nm), supplied with a constant intensity in the reactor. The concentration of ozone in the square-shape reactor can be controlled by combining the DBD (dielectric barrier discharge) reactor with an AC high voltage supply system. The catalytic performance, in presence of UV irradiation did not show significant changes for MnO2 catalyst. TiO2 catalyst was the different case, which showed higher decomposition activity in presence of UV irradiation. Deactivation of catalyst detected by real – time ozone monitor for 120 hours with a constant inlet ozone concentration.. 1.. . . ozone  

(3)        !"#$%&'volatile  organic compounds, VOCs () odor *  +$,'-.,/012'-345 67   89:; <=>nonthermal plasma?31,+$, '-@ ABCDE 3F  3+G/HIJKheadacheLM Nthroat drynessOPQ+mucous membrane damageRSlung cancer*TUV@W4  X YZ[ \4  ]^ _` abFc U.S. food and drug administrationdefg * †.  .

(4) , ,   E-mail : [email protected] TEL : (02)2123-2821 FAX : (02)312-2159. h,/"ij@  3 ^]    f X\4      kl   mno pqr 

(5)  

(6)  s3:tuv wx y*  p 0zpt^{|electrical discharge process^ }+i~ A  \ €3 ‚.34 p0 zp f  "i ƒ„

(7) †^  3‡dˆ‰Š‹ŒŽ4  O2 + e - e - + O + O O2 + O + M O3 + M. (1) (2). a .‘ O2’ p‘ “”  , ~# O^ , 2 •@ _ X 

(8) a.‘, ^i#–~#’ .‘]  '-H • —O33 i#2•@_f4— i #˜— '-^zpp™š›'-*@    œf4  }0ž^ + DE (residual ozone)@ ]  Ÿ 012 z @   7¡¢4.. 1255.

(9) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. . ., BC  *  , XG/ 1001400 ppmNM,á/2¢4  È /I %' ¼½^ ‘Ò¿• Ž "#$  NÓ,p‘electronhole 3i#2‰¼½#'-3®AÂ3  „–4•Š‹Œ  Ž4. Table 1 Methods for treatment of residual ozone Phase. Gaseous Ozone. Method Adsorption with AC Catalytic Decomposition Thermal Decomposition Bath Washing Soil Decomposition. £^@.,ABC£f¤  #3

(10)  ¥ ¦^ §¨ˆ©? ª6‰ ~#« * ¬­ (adsorption) BC ®i• ¯°f ±I f ²]’ \ž‰,(5)   •(14) ³´.,(15) BC µ ]Ÿ¶· ¸¹  ¤# _º» f ²]’ \4. ¼½? 31f ]Ÿ z  BC  ¾# + @ ¿À0ž^ ]Ÿ X #.‘I’ i #'^ œ2ˆ Á ² Ã/  ¶·3 Ą $ˆÅ BC UÆ0H ]ŸÇ3 Å  \ 4@]Ÿ ¼½Ç}0ž^01    2¼½   È/I%'^ 

(11)    * ɲ]Ÿ#Ê3 4¹¼½Ë,’gC@ Ì0ž^ » —k¢4.  ? œ  .,¼½  ., Š‹Œ  Ž4. (10) O3 + 2* O2* + O* O2* + * 2 O* 2O* O 2 + 2*. (3) (4) (5). a3¼½~#‚ —~# .‘O2*~#O*^, 2• @_ X!a ai#–~# .‘’¼½~#‚active site —J Í~#^, 2•@_ ‰ a !aJÍ~#’~#‚. 2d 7.‘^2•@_f4   @ ]Ÿ  ¼½Ç^ μ½photocatalystfÏÆ/rÐ2X\ 4 μ½ Ç .,¼½ ozone decomposition catalyst, ODC>ђˆ^¼½ f ]Ÿ Ç3ˆ ¼½ ‘Ò¿ ultraviolet ray@NÓ Ô@¼½~#‚’ ~#%2d %Õ3 3‡dr4 36f μ ½Ç k^ÖB.×˜Ø —-

(12) ' -ÙÚTy$,’|]ŸÛÜ Ý 36| Ž Ý3d^Þ bioaerosol ]  Ÿ/012X\4 μ½  ‘Ò  ¿• ß&2d à® }0ž^ Ó1–4  . hv 3.2 eV. TiO2. h+ + e(6) e + O3 O3 (7)  h+ + OH- OH (8) O3- + O3 O4- + O2 (9)  OH + O3 O4- + H+ (10) O4- + O3 2O2 + O3(11) (12) H+ + O3- + O4- 3 O2 + OH(6)a  ¼½’ ‘Ò¿ ,  ’ p ‘ ž^ , 2 •3X, (7)a (6)a  i#– p‘’ •  —  â3;@ i#  •3‰, (8)a (6)a i#–  3 š› ãäå (hydroxyl group)  — ãäå æç (radical)3 i#2 •34. (9)a (7)a i#–  â3;3 •  — O4 â3;• .‘’ i#2 • 3X, (10)a (8)a i#– ãäå æç 3 •  — O4 â3;• 3;3 i #2 •34. (11)a (9)• (10)a i#– O4 â3;3 •  — J Í .‘   â3;@ È#  •3X, (12)a (9) • (10)a i#– 3;, O4 â3;• (11)  3;3  — 3 Í .‘ š› ãä^^ pÖ2  ., èߕ @ _f4. pI éê Š‹Œ  Ž3  A  \4. hv 3.2 eV. 2O3. 3O2. (13). TiO2. ë ÏÆ +ì0ž^ ]í-î½2 ©ï |È (monolithic shape) .,¼½ (MnO2) μ½ (TiO2) \d ]Ÿ ð#ʕ gáñ ’ò f #Êl% f ¾#@ Ì 0ž^ ºH Ô4.. 2..

(13). ëÏÆ]Ÿ\d}0H .,¼½,3%óñMnO23© ï |ÈY‡_7aluminaôIsupporter/bed. 1256.

(14) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. Table 2 Basic Information of Catalysts Size of Catalys t Bed (L*W* D, cm3). Mesh Size (#/in). Bed Material. Preparation Method. Additives (absorber). MnO2. 5*5*4.5. 14. Alumina. Impregnation. -. TiO2. 5*5*4.5. 10. Inorganic Paper. ImpregnationCoating. Activated Carbon, Zeolite.  ôˆimpregnated–BCf ÔXμ½ ,3%õ¡öTiO23~#«] ÷3ø ù’] ú ©ï |È ûè3 inorganic paperôIôˆ8ü’ýþ33 ‡drBCf Ô4. ¼½ pIj3 1 3 X A Â, .,¼½ BC 1 3 ©J  3‰, μ½ BC TiO2, ~#«, ]÷3ø Ë·3 0.2, 0.5, 0.3 3¢4. 36f ÌNM + ì0ž^ ]í$î½2.,¼½μ½ f}0H¾#@œ ]b  7@ XZ Ô ²34 3 Ž3 XZ– ¼½ 0&f]Nz ž^]íf¼½ fð » 7¡¢4 % •Ž3Ìgh?Æ# Ô4.  (compressor)7;}ø (oil trap)• $jN regulator? K• X  8 ºM N diffusion dryer HEPA (high efficiency particulate filter)^ Æ#– % á| (air filtering system)@ K•f4 % á|@ K•fc% &'( # ' !!)*,$j3 +  ^ N–4 N– $j ›3 ,   - HzÈ ø^$

(15) 2d%'()## ?K• X }‚ ’ž^p֖4"ij    "i function generator Ïߖ ./ alternating current Xp "i high voltage generator$pIm dzpp™ž^ IEáñ ¸ 0&f G/? H’p kÙÙÈ*@l%á N Ô4"i –  ¼½ ø^ $

(16) 2d .,2‰  ¼½ ø?K•fG/B3  +0H < t^ sampling probe? K,  1  $jž^ 2¢4 .,¶· áñ©vReal-Time Ozone Monitor, Porta Sens 2, Ati@až^Æ Ô4 (14a//¼½ ø $

(17) G/¼½ ø? K•fG/? . Fig. 1 Experimental Set-up _f4@K,» —Ó1 Ô 2ˆ Á G/? ž^ JX 3 @

(18) $ m^ c^  — Ë, å Ô4åf3v. η O Conversion (%) = (1 − 3. Co ) × 100 Ci. (14). ^‚v»a@8]Ì2 5a@01 —@ Ô4  ’$  }Â $   }Â3 regression coefficient44  3¢4 ¼½ ø › • Ä3’ ©J 50 mm 3 X, ø  È+ %  7¡ B•  3’  15.5 mm  134.5 mm H 56 t (BLB, 315-400 nm, 4W, F4T5BLB, Sankyo)? ø? ˜K — 4 ž^ m£2X 56 t C ¼½’ m£2d \4. 56 t po 220V AC p ž^ ¤? K, } /å Ô4. ¼½  

(19)  7¡ ©ï |È    ¼ ½’ 3 (depth, D)’ 1/5 m – 0.9 cm ^ 5 Í  ^ 7 d 56 t Ÿ ? 2.2 cm ^ $ˆ Ô 4. ¼½ 56 t Ÿ  Fluent 6.1 @ 31 — Ì 012 IEáñ ’g ! 0.0375 - ($j = 180 lpm) BC , $òg @ , — ß Ô4. .,¶·  ,¼½? K•   IEáñ ?  7  -  - ^$jž^ +lpm  lpm" —56 H’—‚$

(20)  G/?l^ — Ô4Ìl# áñ .3‰+$/8 ^$ˆ Ô4. 1257.

(21) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. 3..    100. 3.1 UV    ë ÏÆ +ì1 .,¼½ μ½ .,¾#@ %’  \d k&l? X – 56 NÓ NM ¼½  IEáñ@ l%á ’‰ 56 t? on, off '@ Â, G/ ? 5  30 ppm ž^ N  €ž^ Ô4. I Eáñ3  0.0375 sec   1.35 sec H N M G/’ 5  30 ppm }   . ,¶· F 1  15 % F 0.4  11 %^ 2¢4. IEáñ (’ ¸ .,¶·  ¿È0ž^ (’  BV@ »ÔX, G/ ’ µ NM #Ê3 IEáñ3   H BC  F 0.6 • 4 %/ Äâ@ ºH Ô4.. Ozone Conversion (%). 90 UV off (TiO_2). 80. UV on (TiO_2). 70. UV off (MnO_2) UV on (MnO_2). 60 50 40 30 0.0100. 0.1000. 1.0000. 10.0000. Residence Time (sec). Fig. 3 Initial Ozone Conversion (at 5 ppm) 3.2

(22)   % •%! G/?   ž^N Ô@Â56tpoH’—‚ ¸¹¼½#.,¶·@7¡¢4%  ߕμ½BC.,¼½ Ë,56 NÓf.,¶·Í¿3IE áñ)¸F8/Í¿*@º HA\¢4 %!  ߕ %  ߕ $Óf BV @ »Ô4. IEáñ3 0.225 - »4 + BC \d %  BC»4 ¼½ñ #Ê,3’ F. 100. Ozone Conversion (%). 80. Ozone Conversion (%). In l e t O 3 C once n trati on (ppm ) 5 30. UV on (TiO_2) UV off (MnO_2). 40. UV on (MnO_2). 0 0.0100. 0.1000. 1.0000. 10.0000. Residence Time (sec). 10. Fig. 4 Initial Ozone Conversion (At 30 ppm). 5. 0 0.0100. UV off (TiO_2). 20. 20. 15. 60. 0.1000. 1.0000. 10.0000. Re si de n ce Ti m e (se c). Fig. 2 Ozone Conversion with UV irradiation (At 293 K, BLB lamp). 8 %/ (’ Ô4. .,¼½ BC %   ߕ >ђˆ^ UV NÓ .,¶·  Í¿3 Ÿ 3‡dˆˆ Á-4. μ½ B C IEáñ3 0.135 - ? Wž^ IEáñ3 + BC UV t poH’—‚ ¸¹ ¶· Í¿3 %  Ë, F 15 % / (’ ÔX, › IEáñ3 ! BC %  ߕ Ÿ ò} Ô4. IEáñ)¸¹¼½# #Ê,3 %   BC IEáñ3  . 1258.

(23) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집. oH’—‚¸¹¼½#gáñ

(24) áñ .,¶·¾#@7¡¢456 ?NÓ ˆÁ BC  ¼½.,¶·: ¿ . 100. Ozone Conversion (%). 90.  / $9 3X  ¼½ BC $7 ^F9 m/¼½’Ä-49f56 ? NÓf BC  ¼½ .,¶· :  ¿ / $ 3X  ¼½ BC $ 

(25) ! ^F+m/¼½’Ä-4% 9  ߕ 56 ? NÓ ˆ Á BC  ¼½ .,¶· :  ¿ / $

(26) 7 3X¼½BC$7 ^F! m/  ¼½’ Ä-4 9f 56 ? NÓf BC  ¼½ .,¶· :  ¿ / $ 

(27)  3X  ¼½ BC $

(28) ^ F m/¼½’Ä-4. 80. UV off-TiO_2. 70. UV on-TiO_2 UV off-MnO_2. 60. UV on-MnO_2. 50 0. 2000. 4000. 6000. 8000. O pe rati on Ti m e (m i n ). Fig. 5 Long-term Ozone Conversion (At 5 ppm) (RT = 0.225sec, 120 hours operation). 4.. 100.0. ëÏÆ+ì1.,¼½MnO2¬ ­- ù’]’ œ– μ½ TiO2? 31  —DEðgáñ

(29) áñ.,¾ #@Ì@K, XX0 Ô4 OXPG 56NÓf.,¶·IEáñ3 7 -  - HNM G/’     }   F    8F! 8^2¢4G G OYPG    G/ù’]? œf μ ½BC56tpoH’,.,¶ ·3   8/Í¿2¢4 .,¼½ BCG/’  HNM©J56  . UV off-Ti O _2 UV on -Ti O _2. 90.0 Ozone Conversion (%). UV off-MnO _2 UV on -Mn O _2 80.0. 70.0. 60.0. 50.0 0. 2000. 4000 6000 Operation Time (min).  . 8000. Fig. 6 Long-term Ozone Conversion (At 30 ppm) (RT = 0.225 sec, 120 hours Operation).  -»4!BC56poH’—‚û˜ „ .,¼½’μ½Ë,¶·3µ. %! BC% •Ž3¼½#¶· ,3F8/^Ÿò} 7IEáñ 3

(30)

(31) -»4!BC‚v.,¼½’ μ½¶·»4µ.4  3.3

(32)    % %9 G/’   HBCIEáñ3

(33)

(34) - 56 tp.  G t poH’—‚ ¸¹ ¶· l%’ Ÿ 1¢4 (3) G/’   3X IEáñ3 

(35)

(36)  -HBC56 ?NÓ ˆÁ-@¼ ½.,¶·: ¿/$9 3 X  ¼½ BC $7 ^ F 9 m/ 

(37)  ¼½’ Ä-4 9f 56 ? NÓf BC  ¼½ .,¶· :  ¿ / $ 3X¼½BC$

(38) ! ^F+ m/¼½’Ä-4G/’  3XIEáñ3

(39)

(40) -HBC56 ?NÓ ˆÁ-@¼½.,¶·: ¿. 1259.

(41) 대학기계학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 논문집.  / $

(42) 7 3X  ¼½ BC $ 7 ^F! m/¼½’Ä-49 f56 ?NÓfBC¼½.,¶·:  ¿ / $

(43)  3X  ¼½ BC$

(44) ^Fm/¼½’Ä4.   3ɲÖB‚ˆo ,{23ÖB Ç•]•]°4:

(45) $

(46) $9ì‘o‚  ˆo  K23ÇÍ" •]•]°4:

(47) $

(48) $++ — ˆo2d3)Óäu 4.  (1) Lin, J., Kawai, A. and Nakajima, T., 2002, “Effective Catalysts for Decomposition of Aqueous Ozone,” Applied Catalyst B: Environmental, Vol. 39, Issue 2, pp. 1~2. (2) Hsu, Y. C., Yang, H. C. and Chen, J. H., 2001, "Decolorization of Dyes Using Ozone in a GasInduced Reactor," AlChe Journal, Vol. 47, Issue 1, pp. 169~176. (3) Pengyi, Z., Fuyan, L., Gang, Y., Qing, C. and Wanpeng, Z., 2003, “A Compartive Study on Decomposition of Gaseous Toluene by O3/UV, TiO2/UV and O3/TiO2/UV,” J. of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, Vol. 156, pp. 189~194. (4) Sekiguchi, K., Sanada, A. and Sakamoto, K., 2003, "Degradation of Toluene with an OzoneDecomposition Catalyst in the Presence of Ozone, and the Combined Effect TiO2 Addition," Catalysis Communications, Vol. 4, pp. 247~252. (5) Mills, A., Lee, S. K. and Lepre, A., 2003, "Photodecomposition of Ozone Sensitised by a Film of Titanium Dioxide on Glass," J. of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, Vol. 155, pp. 199~205. (6) Dorsey, J. A. and Davidson, J. H., 1994, "Ozone Production in Electrostatic Air Cleaners with Contaminated Electrodes," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 370~376. (7) Liu, L., Guo, J., Li, J. and Sheng, L., 2000, "The Effect of Wire Heating and Configuration on Ozone Emission in a Negative Ion Generator," J. of Electrostatics, Vol. 48, pp. 81~91. (8) Tanasomwang, T. and Lai, F. C., 1997, "Long-Term Ozone Generation from Electrostatic Air Cleaners," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications Annual Meeting, pp. 2037~2044. (9) Niu, J. L., Tung, T. C. W. and Burnett, J., 2001, "Quantification of Dust Removal and Ozone Emission of Ionizer Air-Cleaners by Chamber Testing," J. of. Electrostatics, Vol. 51-52, pp. 20~24. (10) Dhandapani, B., and Oyama, S. T., 1997, "Gas Phase Ozone Decomposition Catalysts," Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Vol. 11, pp. 129~166. (11) Ohkubo, T., Hamasaki, S., Nomoto, Y., Chang, J. and Adachi, T., 1990, "The Effect of Corona Wire Heating on the Downstream Ozone Concentration Profiles in an Air-Cleaning Wire-Duct Electrostatic Precipitator," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 542~549. (12) Viner, A. S., Lawless, P. A., Ensor, D. S. and Sparks, L. E., 1992, "Ozone Generation in DC-Energized Electrostatic Precipitators," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 504~512. (13) Rice, R. G. and Netzer, A., 1982, “Handbook of Ozone Technology and Applications,” Ann Arbor Science, Vol. 1. (14) Park, H. S., Hwang, T. M., Kang, J. W., Choi, H. and Oh, H. J., 2001, “Characterization of Raw Water for the Ozone Application Measuring Ozone Consumption Rate,” Wat. Res., Vol. 35, No. 11, pp. 2607~2614. (15) Lim, H. N., Choi, H., Hwang, T. M. and Kang, J. W., 2002, “Characterization of Ozone Decomposition in a Soil Slurry: Kinetics and Mechanism,” Wat. Res., Vol. 36, pp. 219-229. ~ (16) Villasenor, J., Reyes, P. and Pecchi, G., 2002, “Catalytic and Photocatalytic Ozonation of Phenol on MnO2 Supported Catalysts,” Catalysis Today, Vol. 76, pp. 121~131. (17) Ollis, D. F., 2000, “Photocatalytic Purification and Remediation of Contaminated Air and Water,” Surface Chemistry and Catalytics, Vol. 3, pp. 405~411.. 1260.

(49)

참조

관련 문서

K., &#34;Hydrogen production by catalytic decomposition of methane over activated carbons: kinetic study&#34;, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol...

• Controlled decomposition of organic materials such as plant materials, animal waste, food.. waste, and wastewater sludge

Partial Least Squares or Projection to Latent Structures [PLS].1. LU decomposition or other methods

Figure 14 Shift of Fabry-Pérot fringe pattern (left) and quenching PL spectra (right) of Cu(II)-TMEDA catalyst coated PPS under the exposure of TEP vapors... Figure

4.3  Gauss Elimination with Pivoting 4.4  Gauss‐Jordan Elimination Method 4.5  LU Decomposition Method. 4.6 

In this study, a fine Ce 3 Al 11 phase catalyst was synthesized by mechanochemical reaction and the influence of the catalyst on the NaAlH 4 hydrogen storage properties

Decomposition (MOD) process, and then the zinc oxide nanorods on ZnO seed layer were grown by hydrothermal process from 0.3 M at pH 7, 80 ℃ , 1 h. Single phase zinc oxide

 Drineas et al., Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices III: Com puting a Compressed Approximate Matrix Decomposition, SIAM Journal on Computing,