• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

IEG 환경지질연구정보센터

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IEG 환경지질연구정보센터"

Copied!
13
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)‚“æ~>Æ·~ã²æ. VF¶ò. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003. J"Æ· ^¿;öB Ξçj ۂ ‚' ꚂWB~ Fê. Ö߂Á;«^. “"&v z"/~㦠Optimal Surfactant Screening by Model Application for Soil Washing Process Seung Han Woo and Jong Moon Park Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, POSTECH. º £ ^. ꚂWB¢ šÏ‚ J" Æ·~ ^¿ » 'Ï J"bî~ ªV¢ Ö;† > ®º Ξj BB~& . š Ξ j ‚Ï~ ^¿Î"¢ &z† > ®º ꚂWB~ F; O», b Î&ï Î", ‚' ^¿ O»j .~& . J"bîf naphthalene, phenanthrene, pyrene, ꚂWBº Triton X-100, Tergitol NP-10, Igepal CA-720, Brij 30j &çb‚ ~& . ÿ¢‚ Cï~ ꚂWB¢ Òφ r b~ Î&ïš Ã&~z¢ê ^¿Î"~ – Ã& Î "& ìî . ÿ¢‚ Cï~ b 5 ꚂWB¢ Òφ ãÖ 1² ^¿ ³ ^¿š z Î"'šîb–, ³ ^ ¿öB b" ꚂWB¢ ÿ¢~² ªV~º ©š ‚'šî . b" ꚂWB ÒÏï 5 ³^¿ ²>ö V¢ ‚' ꚂWB~ «~& ¢î > ®î .  Ξ ‚ÏV»f J"Æ· ^¿ » 'Ï ǂ þj >¯~ V š*ö ꚂWB~ öï" ‚' ; Jêö ‚ÏF > ®j ©š . Abstract A model describing the distribution of contaminants in soil/water systems for the application of soil-washing technology using surfactant was developed. The model simulation was conducted for screening the best surfactant, evaluating the effect of water dose, and optimizing soil-washing methodology. Naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene as target compounds and Triton X-100, Tergitol NP-10, Igepal CA-720, and Brij 30 as surfactants were used in the model simulations. The washing efficiency was not greatly enhanced by increasing water dose with the same total surfactant dose. The approach of successive washings was more efficient than a single washing with the same amount of water and surfactant. Equal allotment of the amount of water and surfactant was the best condition for the successive washings. The model can be applied for the optimal design of the soil washing process without extra experimental efforts. Keywords : modeling, PAH, soil, surfactant, washing. 1.. B †. ">Ú ®º Fš zbîf >î 5 &VJ"ö jš žÂ³ê& ¶Ò *ã‚& Ç~ J V* ÿn æ³'b‚ ž*" êö '‚ ¦·Ïj .¾† > ® . ß®, ²>W FšFVbî~ C“b‚B HOC (Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals)º bö &‚ Ϛê&. J¾Æ ÖÒ¾¢º /ς Öëzö Vž '« Fš z bî~ Zªê‚ ÒÏ" ¦'.‚ ¾Ò b‚ žš Æ ·~ã~ J"š '‚ >&ö šš ® . Æ·ö J. 1). *Corresponding author : [email protected] : 2003. 3. 26 : 2003. 7. 28 : 2003. 12 30. ö7>¢ î~ 5 Æ~. ²Òߞ¢ ræ. 61.

(2) Ö߂Á;«^. 62. Ô Æ·ö &‚ ‡OKš ¸j ¶çöBº ËV * Æ·ö ºš† > ®bæ‚ š ~ B–¢ *‚ '. ‚ ~ãö VF~ BBš . ® º’> ® . Æ· ‡OKš ;‚ FšFVbîj B–~º VF‚B ꚂWB¢ šÏ‚ Æ·^¿ »f 6Ò 'Ï> ® º VF 7 ~¾š . ꚂWBº fj ;W~º ß; ³ê(CMC, critical micelle concentration) šçöB HOC~ Ïšê¢ Ã&ʺ †j ‚ . ꚂWB¢ šÏ‚ ^¿Î"¢ &z~V *šBº ꚂWB~ & Ïz(solubilization) ";ö &‚ Ϫ‚ šš¢ :ûb‚ '.‚ ꚂWB~ F;" ÎN'ž ^¿O»~ 'Ϛ. Ö 7º~ ~Æ . 1990j& .> šê ꚂWB~ &Ïzö &‚ V 'ž š†Îž š >ã>î, ꚂWB¢ Ž~º Æ ·/b êöB HOC~ ï;ªV¢ J«~V *‚ >; jš > ® . ¾, Vš~ ’öBº Ξ j ۂ &Ïz *ç~ ššö 76j vîb–, ;J ê‚~ wÏj *‚ «'ž 7"f ¦—~ . V¢B,  ¢^öBº š‚ Ξj V>b‚ ~ ^¿;ö ~ ‚ÏWj 7b‚ ꚂWB Fê O»†ö &‚  Vj 76'b‚ ¦Æ~& . ß®, b~ ÒÏï æzö Vž Î"f ^¿O» ‚'zö &‚ ’¢ >¯~&b –, Ëê Æ· ^¿ ;~ Jê ÒÏ~V *‚ O»† j B~¶ ‚ .  O»†f Ξ~ *²z 5 þ æ>~ ‚²zö Vž *‚ Ξçj ۚ ;Jê ꚂWB .VFê" þ Ê&šç, Ú*O» J;~ æŽj B† > ®j ©b‚ V&‚ . 2,3). 4-8). 9). 10-17). 2.. Fig. 1. Distribution of HOC and surfactant in soil washing process. (I) Source soil. (II) Soil/water system. (III) Soil/water/surfactant system.. O ç(sorbed phase)ö &š Phase A, B, C‚ ‚V~& . Æ· /b êöB~ HOC ªV HOC ³ê(C , mg/kg)‚ J"B Æ·(w , kg)ö b (v , L)j Î&~š r" ?f bî>æš WãB . 2.1.. >' Ξ. s,j,ini.  Ξf FšFVbî(HOC)‚ J"B Æ·~ ^¿Î "¢ .G~V *‚ ©b‚ ꚂWB¢ Ž‚ ^¿> ¢ Î&† r ï;öB~ J"bî ªV¢ .G~º Ξ š . ʂf êê‚ ’² 3&枖 .V J" Æ· (Fig. 1, System I), B> b‚ ’CB Æ· ÒÒ(Fig. 1, System II), ꚂWB¢ Î&‚ Æ· ÒÒ(Fig. 1, System III)‚ ’ª~& . Ξf V'b‚ Luthy  ~ ’Ö" j :ûb‚ ’W~& .  Ξf "Úê Æ· ^¿ –šöB~ ï;8j Ö ~êƒ ~&b–, r ªš Ξ‚~ {Ëj J~ ’W~& . Fig. 1~ System IIIöB º :f ?š 3 &æ çö šÒ~º ©b‚ ~b–, '' B>χ ç (aqueous pseudophase), f ç(micelle phase), Æ· ‡ 10-14). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003. soil. aq. wsoilCs, j, ini=v aqCl, j+wsoil Cs, j. or. Cl, j Cs, j, ini= -------- + Cs, j (1) fs/l. wsoil fs/l= ---------vaq. (2). VB, jº ¾Ò &çš >º FšFVb, f (kg/L) f Æ· Žï, C (mg/L)f ‡ç ³ê, C (mg/kg)º Æ ·öB~ ³êš .  (1) ²G ~ ²æf .V J"Æ ·ö(Fig. 1~ system I) ŽB HOC~ C îïš, Ö æf bj Î&‚ šê(Fig. 1~ system II) Æ·" ‡ç ö ª~º îï~ š . ‚Þ, bj Î&‚ šê~ Æ · ÒÒ ʂöB C HOC~ ³ê(C , mg/L)º. r" ?š ‚*B . s/l. l,j. s,j. t,j.

(3) J"Æ· ^¿;öB Ξçj ۂ ‚' ꚂWB~ Fê (3). Ct, j =Cl, j+fs/l Cs, j. Æ·" b ҚöB HOC~ ï;öB~ ªVº r" ?f Freundlich isothermb‚ ‚*† > ®b–, ³ê& ’æ pf ãÖ n = 1ž F;&ê‚ ‚*† > ® . 18,19). n. Cs,j = KdCl,j. (4). ß®, ~O˗ êz>²~ ªVê>(K , L/kg)º Æ·~ FVb Wª(f , g/g)" &çbî~ KêR-b ªVê> (K , L/L)‚¦V r &êö ~š .G† > ® . d. oc,s. 16). ow,j. Kd = 0.63foc,sKow,j. (5). ꚂWB~ 'Ë êš‚WBº ‚>W ^Ò ¦ª" ²>W~ RÒ ¦ª b‚ ’W>Ú ®, ß; ³ê(CMC, critical micelle concentration)šçb‚ šÒ† ãÖ fj ;W~² > – V¢B HOCº f Ú¦ö ³>Ú HOC~ ¯V Ïšêº Ã&~² B . Æ· ÒÒ ʂö ꚂW B¢ Î&~² >š  Î&ïö V¢ HOC~ ªVö ' Ëj ~² B . Æ·/b ʂöB(Fig. 1, system II) ꚂWB¢ –.O Î&~š .Vöº Æ·ö ‡O~– ¾, ‡çöº ïڂ šÒ~² B . ꚂWB ³ê& Ã&~ Æ·ö Ϫ® ‡O~ ‡ç³ê& CMC¢ . "~š fj ;W~V ·‚ (Fig. 1, system III). fš šÒ~º ʂöB HOCº Æ· ‡Oç, B> χ ç, f ç~ 3&æ çö šÒ~² B . ÖF, Æ ·" B>χ Қ~ HOC ªVê>º Æ·/b êöB ~ ªVê>ž K ( 4)fº ž 8j &ê . f" FÒ >χ Қöº r" ?š ;~>º ªVê>ö ~š Ö;B . 2.2.. d. mtot Ds = --------vaq. (7). ꚂWB~ C³ê(C , g/L)º Æ·Ú ³ê(C , g/ kg)f >χöB~ ³ê(C , g/L), Ò >χöB~ ³êº  f ç‚ šÒ~º ³ê(C , g/L)f  ïÚ ³ê(C , g/L)~ b‚ ‚*B . Æ· ÒÒ êöBº ꚂWB~ ‡Oö ~š CMC& B> χö jš Ã&~² > š¢ CMC(s)(g/L)¢ ~š, š¢ ã ê‚ ''~ ³ê& Ö;B . t,s. (6). VB, X (−)" X (−)º '' f ç" B>χ çö B~ Öjš . š 8f HOC~ ³êö &êìš ç>š –, log K f "Úê ꚂWBöB log K f F;' ž &ê¢ &æº ©b‚ > ® . m. a. m. ow. 10). ꚂWB ‡O Æ· ÒÒ ʂöB ꚂWBº Æ·ö ‡O~æ ‚ FVb¾" ·Ï~ ªVê>¢ æzÒ öò jî ¢, î'ž CMC ³ê¢ Ã&ʲ B . ÖF, Æ· ÒÒö Î&>º ꚂWB(D , g/L; m , g)º r" ? . 2.3.. s. tot. s,s. l,s. l,mic. l,mon. Ct,s = Cl,s + fs/lCs,s and Cl,s = Cl,mon + Cl,mic. (8). Cl,mic = Ds − CMC(s) and Cl,mon = CMC (if Ds >= CMC(s)) (9a) Cl,mic = 0 (if Ds < CMC(s)). (9b). šçöB ꚂWB~ bî>æj Ö>‚ ‚ *~š r" ? . CMC(s). mmic = mtot – Qmaxwsoil – vaqCMC. (10). VB, Q (g/kg)º ꚂWB~ ‚&‡Oïš . ꚂWB& Æ·ö ‡O>º ·f ‡çöB fš ;WF rræ Ã&~ & CMC šçš >š ¢;‚ © b‚ z® rJæ ®b– , CMC(s)º r" ? š ’† > ® . max. 12,14,15). CMC(s) = fs/lQmax + CMC. (11). š r~ ‚& ‡Oïf Æ·~ «~, ꚂWB~ «~ ö V¢ ¢æ¾, Æ·/b jfº &êìš ¢;~ .  ¾, ꚂWB~ ‡Oö &šBº transitional zone ; W , surface micellization *ç , CMC(s) šçöB~ ꚂWB~ îO 5 º&‡O  ·‚ *ç. š > ® jB Ξ š B> ® .  ΞöBº æ>¢ ‚²z~V *š &Ë V'ž Bv b‚B Liuš þöB ’‚ r~ ‡OªV j ' Ï~& . ¾, ꚂWB~ ‡OFj þöB ’‚ š Ξj º&‚ {Ë~º ©š &ˆ ©š . CMC(s) š~öB~ ‡OªVº r" ? . 16). 17). 11). Km = Xm /Xa. 63. 16,17). 11). n. Cs,s = Kd,sCl,s. (12). VB, K (L/kg)º ꚂWB~ ‡OªVê>š . ê š‚WB~ ‡OªVº ¢N'b‚º F;b‚ &;~ Ξ’V¢ ‚²z~&b–, ‚&‡Oïö ê† r ‡ ç ³êº CMC& B . V¢B, ‚&‡Oïj rš ªV d,s. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003.

(4) Ö߂Á;«^. 64. ê>¢ r" ?š .G† > ® . Kd,s = Qmax / CMC(s). (13). Æ·~ FVb Wª f * (g/g)f Æ·ö ꚂWB& ‡OŽö V¢ 8š æz~² >–, šº ªVê>~ 8 ö 'Ëj ‚ . (14) f * = f + εÁf ÁC Á10 VB, f (g/g)º Æ·¶Ú~ FVb Žïš, f (g/g) f ꚂWB~ ê² ªNš . Æ·FVb" jv~ ꚂWB FVê²~ ç&' ‡Oê‚B effectiveness factorž ε º 1‚ &;~& . CMC(s)öB HOC~ Æ·/B>χ ªVê>º r" ?š ‚*† > ® . oc,s. oc,s. oc,s. c,m. −3. s,s. oc,s. c,m. 13). 13). * Sw  foc , s Kd, cmc=Kd ----------  ---------  Scmc  foc, s. (15). VB, S (mg/L)f S (mg/L)º '' B> b" CMCö B~ HOC Ïšêš . ‚Þ CMC(s) š~öB~ ªVê >º,  15öB S ¢ S (CMC š~öB~ Ϛê) ‚ &Ú~ Ö;F > ® . S º C f S ~ &ê¢ (0, S )f (CMC, S )~ v 6 Қ¢ F;'b ‚ &;‚ öB .G† > ® . w. cmc. cmc. subcmc. subcmc. w. l,s. subcmc. cmc. *. Sw  foc, s Kd, subcmc=Kd  ------------------------------------------------------------  ---------  Cl, s ( Scmc – Sw )/CMC+S w  foc, s. &ê .  (18)öB MSRj ’~V *šBº K öò jî¢, C 8ê rj¢ ~–, šº j¾f ?f Ö> V&~ HOC bî>æj ۚ ’† > ® . m. aq,j. 13). II. III. (16). Ϛ Æ·/b/ꚂWB 6º b/ꚂWB ʂöB HOC & "¯b‚(separate phase) šÒ~š HOCº ' çöB (Fig. 1, System III~ Phase A, B, C) z³ê¢ &æ ² B . šf ?f "¯šÒ çöB~ þb‚¦V á f MSR" S ‚¦V f ç" B>χ ç Қ~ HOC ªVê> K (−) 8j ’† > ® .. III. III. (19). VB, ²æf ꚂWB& Î&>V * ʂ(Fig. 1, system II)~ HOC C Ö>š Öæf ꚂWB& Î &B šê~ ʂ(Fig. 1, system III)š . ' ʂö B~ n (mol), n (mol), n (mol)f '' B>χ ç, Æ· ‡O ç, f ç~ HOC Ö>š . šr ' “Ïj ªVê>f ³ê‚ ‚*~š r" ? . aq,j. sorb,j. mic,j. 13). Km Vw Caq, j III nmic, j= --------------------------------( mtot – Qmaxwsoil – vaq CMC ) 1–KmVw Caq, j. (20). Kd, cmc wsoil III III naq, j+n sorb, j=Caq, j vaq 1 + ---------------------------   vaq. (21). Kdwsoil II II II naq, j+n sorb=Cl, j, ini vaq 1 + ------------------  vaq . (22). VB, V (L/mol)º b~ Ö¦bš–, V^~ çFf î ïj ւ ~ւ 8š .  (20), (21), (22)¢  (19)ö &«~ ;Ò~š, j¾f ?f šNO;~ š‚B C ¢ ’† > ® . w. 13). aq,j. 2. 2.4. HOC. 0.5. –b + ( b – 4ac ) Caq, j= --------------------------------------2a. (23). VB,. Kd, cmcwsoil a=–Km Vw 1 + ---------------------------   vaq. (24a). Kd wsoil Kd, cmcwsoil II b=Cl, j, ini KmVw 1 + ------------------ +  1 + ---------------------------   vaq   vaq mtot–Qmaxwsoil – vaqCMC +Km Vw -------------------------------------------------------------vaq. cmc. (24b). 10). m. 1 MSR Km = ------------------ ------------------ Scmc Vw 1 + MSR. (17). "¯~ HOC& šÒ~æ pº ãÖ îR&æ‚ r" ?f &êj &ê . 1 MSR Km = ------------------- ------------------ C V  1 + MSR aq, j w. II. naq, j+n sorb, j=n aq, j+nsorb, j +nmic, j. or. KmVw Caq, j MSR= --------------------------------1 – KmVw Caq, j. (18). VB, K f ç>8j &æ¾, MSR" B>χ ç~ HOC ³êž C (mg/L) 8f f ³êö V¢ æz~º 8j m. aq,j. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003. Kd wsoil II c=–Cl, j, ini  1 + ------------------  vaq . (24c). VB, K (L/kg)º CMC(s)öB B>χ ç" Æ· ‡O ç Қ~ HOC ªVê>š . *~ öB ’‚ C ‚¦V r" ?š ªVê> K ¢ šÏ~ C ¢ ’† > ® . d,cmc. aq,j. Cs,j = Kd,cmcCaq,j. d,cmc. s,j. (25). ‚Þ, MSR 8b‚¦Vº r" ?š f çö šÒ~ º HOC~ ³ê¢ ’† > ® ..

(5) J"Æ· ^¿;öB Ξçj ۂ ‚' ꚂWB~ Fê. 65. Table 1. Formulas and properties of HOCs relevant to this study [10] Property mol formula Mw,j (g/mol) log Kow,j Sw (mol/L). Naphthalene C10H8 128 3.36 3 10−4. Ü. Phenanthrene C14H10 178 4.57 1 10−5. Pyrene C16H10 202 5.18 1 10−6. Ü. Ü. *ê‚ HOCf ꚂWB~ ªVê>¢ ;Ò~š Fig. 2 f ? . ‚Þ, ꚂWB 'Ï ÎNj ¾æâ > ®º 悂B, Î&‚ ꚂWB Î&ï &j HOC &Ï ªN 8(E , g ) j r" ?š ;~~ ꚂWB Fêö 'φ > ® . s. Fig. 2. The partition coefficients of HOC and surfactant for each phase with various surfactant concentrations.. (26) ÁC Æ· ÒÒ êöB *Ú HOC 7 χçö šÒ~º ª Nž F(−)º r" ?š ‚*B . Cmic,j = MSR. F Es = --------mtot. l,mic. (29). 12). 3.. F = A/(A+B) A = 1+KmVwCl,mic and. B = Kd,cmcwsoil / vaq. −1. *ÖÎÒ. ~ 3B ʂ 7öB &Ë ǂ System IIIö &‚ Ξ‚ ۏ~ *‚Îj ’W~& , V¢B, š *‚Îf(SURFREM) .V J" Æ·ž System I, ê š‚WB& Î&>æ p–¾(System II) Î&B(System III) Æ· ÒÒö &š îR&æ‚ *ÖÎÒ& &Ë~ . š Ξf bî*j J~æ pbæ‚ "Úê –šöB~ ï; 8 ö &‚ êÖÖ"¢ á² B . Ξ *‚Î f EXCEL Worksheet¢ šÏ~ ’*~& .. (27). Fig. 1. šç~ b‚¦V CMC(s) šç~ ꚂWB& šÒ† r ‡ç" ƷҚ~ HOC ¯V ªVê>(K , L/kg)º. r" ?š ‚*B . d,surf. 12). Kd,surf = (1 − F)νaq/(wsoilF) or Kd,surf = Kd,cmc/(1 + KmVwCl,mic) (28). Æ· ÒÒ ʂöB ꚂWB Žïö Vž CMC(s) Table 2. Properties of surfactants relevant to this study [10] Property. Triton X-100 symbol C8PE9.5 mol formula (average) C8H17C6H4OE9.5H Mw,s (g/mol) 625 fc,m (g C/g) 0.634 CMC (mol/L) 1.7 10−4 Nap 3.2 10−4 Scmc (mol/L) Phe 1.3 10−5 Pyr 1.9 10−6 Nap 104.64 Km (−) Phe 105.70 Pyr 106.03 Nap 0.0692 WSR (−) Phe 0.0316 Pyr 0.0114 Qmax (mol/kg) 0.019 E: CH2CH2O. Qmax data were from ref. [11].. Ü Ü Ü Ü. Tergitol NP-10 C9PE10.5 C9H19C6H4OE10.5H 683 0.633 5.4 10−5 4.0 10−4 1.5 10−5 1.2 10−6 104.57 105.72 106.41 0.0690 0.0417 0.0170 0.0113. Ü Ü Ü Ü. Igepal CA-720 C8PE12 C8H17C6H4OE12H 735 0.620 2.3 10−4 3.2 10−4 1.1 10−5 2.1 10−6 104.63 105.68 106.01 0.0563 0.0252 0.0117 0.014. Ü Ü Ü Ü. Brij 30 C12E4 C12H25OE4H 363 0.661 2.3 10−5 3.4 10−4 2.0 10−5 1.1 10−6 104.59 105.57 106.53 0.112 0.0745 0.0398 0.055. Ü Ü Ü Ü. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003.

(6) Ö߂Á;«^. 66. J"Æ· ^¿" &NB &æ –šö &š Ö"¢ j vŽb‚Ž F –š~ æWj ï&~& . ꚂWB ~ «~º Triton X-100, Tergitol NP-10, Igepal CA-720, Brij 30~ 4&æ jšNW ꚂWB¢ F;~& . HOCº ²>Wš ;‚ &‚' bîž PAH(Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon) 7 Ò~ Q¶ö V¢ naphthalene, phenanthrene, pyrene~ 3B¢ F;~& . *ÖÎÒ¢ > ¯‚ æ>º b 5 ꚂWB~ Cï 5 ³êš . Ò , Æ·^¿ö ®Ú ꚂWB F;O»" ÎN' ¾Ò O» Fj *‚ *ÖÎÒ¢ >¯~& . ' HOC~ b Òz' Wîf Table 1, ' ꚂWB &N ç>º Table 2, .V–šj Ž‚ *ÖÎÒö ÒÏB ç>º Table 3ö ;Ò~& . 4.. Ö" 5 V. ꚂWB 5 HOC~ ªV ßW Æ·/b êöB ꚂWB Triton X-100" HOC‚B naphthalene~ ª ßWj Fig. 3ö ¾æÚî . Î&ïš Ã&Žö V¢ ‡çöB~ ïÚ ³êf Æ·ö ‡O~ º ³êº 6N Ã&~ & CMC(s)ö ššš ¢;~² FæB . CMC(s) šçb‚ ê³ Î&~š ‡çöB~ f ³êº F;b‚ Ã&~º ãËj ž . B Æ · þöBº F҂ Ö"öò jî¢ , ž Ö" j "Vê ‚ . .¢ š, CMC(s) šçöBê Ꚃ WB~ ‡Oš Ã&~–¾, îOš ¢Ú¾º ãÖ, CMC(s) ¦"öB jò~² æz~º ãÖš . šº  ΞöBº w÷Ú W , Æ·‚šöB~ š7[ f W , 7*æ ;W f J>æ p~V r^ š . CMC(s) šçöB 20-30% ;ê º&‡Oš ¢Ú¾ –¾ , £ 20% º&îOš ¢Ú ãÖ& ®bæ‚. B ʂöBº š‚ J& jº† ©š . ‚Þ, naphthalene~ ãÖ(Fig. 3b) CMC(s) š*öº Triton X-100š Î&Nö V¢ J®J Æ· ‡O ³ê& Ã&~ ‡ç ³ê& 6²~º ãËj & . šº Æ ·ö ‡OB ꚂWB& FVb †j ~ naphthalene ~ ‡Oj Ã&ÊV r^š . CMC(s)öB fš ; W>V ·~š, Æ·Ú naphthalene~ Žïf 6N 6² ~ f ç~ naphthalene ³êº Ã&~º ãËj  & . >š, B>χç~ naphthalene ³êº f ³ê & Ã&Žö V¢ 6N 6²~º–, šº fš ‡çö B FV ‡OB †j ~ naphthalene~ ªV¢ –. ~V r^š . š‚ ãËf š*~ ôf þ" Ξ 4.1.. 12,14). 11). 12,17). 12,16). 16,17). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003. 11). Fig. 3. Simulation results of partitioning of HOC (naphthalene) and surfactant (Triton X-100) with various surfactant doses with fs/l of 0.1. (a) Surfactant concentration. (b) HOC concentration.. öB æº *çš . Fig. 4º Ξö 'Ï>–¾ êÖF > ®º 7º‚. Bæ> j ¾æÞ ©š . B> χç" Æ·"~ HOC ªVº CMC(s) š~öBº K ¢ Vš– ꚂW B ïÚ~ Ã&ö Vž Ϛê Ã&ª" jf~ F; b‚ Ã&~º ãËj ž . CMC(s) šçöBº ï Ú ³ê& CMCf ÿ¢~² Fæ>æ‚, f ³ê& à &~z¢ê ¢;‚ K ö ~š HOC~ ªV& Ö;B. . K º HOC~ «~ö V¢ Ã&~Vê ~ 6 ²~Vê ~º ž ãËj šº Ö"¢ áî (Ö" Û). š©f  16öB šš† > ®º ©¾" K ö &‚ S ö ~‚ 6²ª" f ö ~‚ Ã&ª~ ç&' ’V Nšö ~š Ö;>V r^š . š©f Æ· ¶Ú ~ FVb Žï"ê &NF öò jî¢, Table 3öB  º :f ?š ꚂWB~ «~f HOC~ «~ö V¢ ¢ê . V¢B, PAH~ Ò>f ?f ßW" ¢~~æ pf ©j B҆ > ®î . ‚Þ, f ç" >χ Ò š~ HOC ªVê>ž ç> K j J~š bulk χ" Æ· Қ~ ¯V ªVê>ž K º 6N 6²~º ãËj š–  ;ê& 6N 6²~º jF; ;‚ 12,14). d,subcmc. d,cmc. d,subcmc. d. cmc. * oc,s. m. d,surf.

(7) J"Æ· ^¿;öB Ξçj ۂ ‚' ꚂWB~ Fê Table 3. Summary of parameter values and variables in the model calculations Parameter wsoil (kg) Cs,j,ini (mg/kg) foc,s (g C/g soil). Value 0.1 200 0.015. Parameter fs/l (kg/L) Ds (g/L) Vw (L/mol). Value 0.1-1 0-10 0.01805. ¾æÒ . K ~ ãËb‚¦V ꚂWB ³ê& Ã& Žö V¢ HOC Ϛê Ã&*çš zzF ©ªj .G † > ® . * f ³ê ϚÒ > ®º HOC~ ³êž MSR 8f ꚂWB ³ê& 6N Ã&Žö V¢ 6²~º ã Ëj " > ® (Fig. 4b). šf &N~, *Ú HOC Ž ï 7öB bulk χö Ϛ>º HOC~ ³êž F 8~ Ã& ;ê& 6N 6²~º ãËj š² B . Fig. 3" 4öB º£‚ ' bî" Bæ>~ æz ßWf š*~. þ 5 Ξ Ö"f ¢~‚ . d,surf. 12,14). 10,12-14). 67. 4.2. ꚂWB~ Fê Æ·^¿ Î"¢ &z~V *šBº '.‚ ꚂW B~ Fêš jº~ . f‚B Table 2ö ;҂ 4 « ~ jšNW ꚂWB¢ &çb‚ Æ·^¿ Î"f & NB ßWj ¦Æ~& . ÖF, ÒÏF ꚂWB~ ·j ‚²z~V *‚ –š 7~ ~¾º fj ;W~V · ~º ³êž CMC 8š Ôj¢ ‚ . Table 1öB º :f ?š Igepal CA-720, Triton X-100, Tergitol NP-10, Brij 30~ Bb‚ ¸f 8j &r . Æ· ÒÒöBº ꚂWB& Æ·ö Ϫ® ‡OB šêö j‚² fj ;W~V r^ö Æ·ö ‡O>º ·(Q )š 'j>ƒ FÒ~ . ¯, *~ CMC 8" Q ¢ Îv J‚ ž¶ž CMC(s) 8š Ôj>ƒ FÒ~ . Fig. 5º ·‚ b~ Žïö Vž ' ꚂWB~ CMC(s)8j ¾æÞ ©š . b~ Î&ïö &êìš Brij 30, Triton X-100, Igepal CA-720, Tergitol NP-10~ Bb ‚ CMC(s)8š ¸f Ö"¢ áî . šº Tergitol NP-10 š f Wj *‚ ꚂWB ²ºïš &Ë 'rj ~‚ . Æ·ö ‡O>º ꚂWB ·š CMC  R ’V r^ö CMC(s)8f CMC Q ö Vž . .‚B, Tergitol P-10~ ãÖ D & 1 L/kg¢r CMC(s) öB 99.5%&, D & 10 L/kg¢r 95.5%& Æ·ö ‡O > ¾^æº ïڂ ‡çö šÒ~& . Î Ꚃ WB~ ãÖö &š b~ Î&ïš Ã&†>ƒ CMC(s) ³ê& 6²‚ . ¾, šº ³ê~ 6²šæ‚ B Î&>º Cïf £* Ã&~º ©j & . .¢ š, Tergitol NP-10~ ãÖ D & 1 L/kg¢ r 7.755 g, D & 10 L/kg¢ r 8.087 g~ ꚂWB& jº~ . ¢ fš WF > ®êƒ ꚂWB& CMC(s) max. max. max. w. w. w. Fig. 4. Parameter values related with partitioning of HOC (naphthalene) with various surfactant (Triton X-100) doses with fs/l of 0.1. (a) Partition coefficients. (b) Molar solubilization ratio and F value.. w. Fig. 5. CMC(s) values with various water doses for 4 different surfactants. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003.

(8) 68. Ö߂Á;«^. Fig. 6. Efficiency of washing of HOC (pyrene) with various doses of 4 different surfactants.. šçb‚ Î&>š, ꚂWB Î&ï  HOC~ f Ú Ïšê¢ ¾æÚº WSR(Weight solubilization ratio) & ¸j>ƒ ÎN'š . Table 2ö ;҂ ©" ?š Brij 30š 3 «~ HOC Îvö &š &Ë ¸f WSRj &^ &Ë ÎN'ž ©j r > ® . šçöB, ꚂWB F;j *‚ 7º‚ v B~ 6 V&~ ~¾ž CMC(s)º Tergitol NP-10š &Ë Ö> ~ Brij 30š &Ë jÎN'ž >š, WSRöBº Brij 30š &Ë Ö>‚ ç>B Ö"¢ áî . šf ?f  'ž Î"¢ 2k~V *š ꚂWB Î&ï  bulk χöB~ HOC Žïj ¾æÚº 悂B Es¢ Ꚃ WB Î&ïö Vž æz¢ ÚÚš Fig. 6" ? . š 悺 8~ ’V ¶Úöº – ~& ìb– v –šV ~ jvöò Òφ > ®j ©š . ꚂWB Î&ï £ 4 g/Lš~öBº CMC(s)& Ôf Tergitol NP-10š &Ë Î"'š–,  šçöBº Tergitol NP-10 Brij 30š £* Ö>Žj " > ® . š‚ ßWf J"Æ·~ J "ê, ¾Ò ς, b" ꚂWB~ Î& >&ö V¢ ‚ ' ꚂWB~ F;š ¢î > ®rj z‚ . b Î&ï Î" Î&~º ꚂWB~ Cïš ¢;~  &;† r b~ Î&ï æzö Vž F 8~ æz¢ Fig. 7ö ¾æ Úî . b Î&ïš 1öB 10 L/kgb‚ Ã&† r F 8 f 6N Ã&~º ãËj "î . ¾,  Ã&~ º ;êº Î&~º ꚂWB Cïš ¸j>ƒ 6²~ & . .¢ Ú, ꚂWB Cïš 4 gž ãÖ D & 1 L/kg¢ r F 8f 0.6028öB 10 L/kgb‚ Ã&~ê 0.6576b‚ £ 10% Ã& >&ö ^b& . š‚ šF 4.3.. w. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003. Fig. 7. F values for naphthalene with various water dose using the same amount of total surfactant of Tergitol NP-10.. º b~ Î&ïš Ã&Žö V¢ ꚂWB Cïš ¢; ~æ‚  ³êº J®J 6²~V r^š . b Î&ï š Ã&Žö Vž F 8~ æz& ꚂWB Cïš Ô j r z – šFº ꚂWB ³ê& Ã&Žö V¢ F Ã&jNš 6²~º Fig. 4b~ ãË" &Nš ® . êš ‚WB ³ê& CMC(s) Ôf ãÖ(m = 0.5 g)º J® J ꚂWB¢ *& Î&~æ p bòb‚ ^¿~º ãÖ F 8š Ô~ . 6‚ ꚂWB Î&ïš CMC(s) šçšz¢ê ’² ç²~æ pº š b Î&ï š ¸f ãÖö(m = 1 g, D = 10 L/kg) ^¿ÎNš êš ‚WB¢ Iæ pº ãÖ Ôj > ®bæ‚ "~& jº† ©š . šç~ Ö"‚¦V ÿ¢‚ ꚂWB¢ Òφ r b~ Î&ïš Ã&~z¢ê ^¿Î"~ – à & Î"¢ V&~V Ú[ J®J jÏÃ&ò .¾† > ®bæ‚, ^¿š &˂ >&öB ‚²‚~ bj ÒÏ~ º ©š F҆ ©š . Fig. 8öBº CMC(s) šç~ –šöB b~ Î&ï æ zö Vž MSR 8j jv~& . ꚂWB ³ê¢ ÿ ¢~²(D = 10 g/L) &;~š, ¯ b Î&ïš Ã&†>ƒ ꚂWB Î&ïê Ã&~ MSRf 6N 6²~º ã Ëj & . šº b Î&ïš Ã&†>ƒ ꚂWB & j ^¿Î"& 6²~º ©j ~‚ . 6‚, ?f ³ê ~ ꚂWB χb‚ ^¿j † ãÖ ‚®ö bj ô š ÒÏ~º © '² ¶" ^¿~º ©š J®J Î N'¢ > ®rj z‚ . ‚Þ, Î&~º ꚂWB~ Cïš ¢;‚ ãÖöê(m = 2 g) b Î&ïš Ã&†> ƒ 6²~º Ö"¢ áî . š ãÖ b~ ·š ôj>ƒ ’CÎ"ö ~š ꚂWB ³êº 6²‚ . îR&æ tot. tot. w. s. tot.

(9) J"Æ· ^¿;öB Ξçj ۂ ‚' ꚂWB~ Fê. 69. Fig. 8. Effect of water dose on MSR value at the same amount of total surfactant or the same surfactant dose for Tergitol NP-10 and naphthalene.. ‚ š‚ Ö"º ?f ꚂWB Î&ïj V&b‚ ' f bj ÒÏ~º ©š z Î"'š¢º ©j z‚ . Æ· ^¿ ‚'z Æ· ^¿ö ®Ú 1² ^¿ ³^¿ö ~š HOC B–ö z Î"'š¢º Ò f Edwards ö ~šB  B : ® . ¾, ³^¿öB~ b ÒÏï" ê š‚WB ÒÏï~ ªV O»  ''ž ‚'z O»ö &šBº ¶ò& ‡~  † > ® . Fig. 9º ÿ¢ ‚ b ÒÏï" ꚂWB ÒÏï –šöB b ÒÏï ªV Î"(a)f ꚂWB ÒÏï ªV Î"(b)¢ ¾æÞ ©š . 1² ^¿ Ö"º Fig. 9(a)~ D (second)& 0ž ã Öö ¾æÚî 2² ³ ^¿ö &‚ ‚'z ^B¢ ¦ Æ~& . 2² ³^¿~ Î ãÖ 1² ^¿ö(89.2% B –) jš z ¸f B–Nj &b–, ‚ B–Nf 96.2%& . š‚ ‚ B–Nf b" ꚂWB~ ã Ö Îv  ªVïš ÿ¢‚ ãÖö áj > ®î . š‚ jvöB Edwards f ³^¿öB ÿ¢‚ bj ÒÏ~æ prb‚Ž ;{‚ jv¢ † > ìº  6š ®î . Edwards ~ 7"O»f 1 L(D = 20 g/L) ~ b‚ 1² ^¿~º ©" 1 L(D = 10 g/L)~ b‚ '' 2² ^¿~º ©j jv~º ©b‚ ꚂWB~ Cïf ÿ¢~æò b ÒÏïf 2Vš .  ’öBº 0.5 L(D = 20 g/L)~ b‚ '' 2² ^¿~º ©b‚ &;~ ÿ ¢‚ b" ꚂWB ÒÏïj 'Ï~&º–,  Ö" ‚ « º~ pyrene ³êº 7.57 mg/kgb‚B Edwards ~ Oö ~‚ Ö"(7.58 mg/kg)f –~ FÒ~ .  šF º Fig. 7, 8öB ÚÚ b ^&ï æzö Vž ^¿Î" 4.4.. 14). w. 14). s. s. s. Fig. 9. Optimizing allotment of water dose (a) and surfactant dose (b). The surfactant was Tergitol NP-10 and HOC was pyrene. Total amount used was 20 g/L for surfactant and 1 L for water.. öB ÚÚ ºž ‚¦V Vž‚ ©š . šf ?š b ~ ÒÏïj *šz¢ê *Ú ^¿Î"& F҆ > ®b æ‚ jÏ'ž GšöBº z FÒ~  † > ® . ‚Þ, ꚂWB~ F;öB ³êö V¢ ^¿Î"&. š º ©j Fig. 6öB ž : ® . š‚ Î"& b~ ÒÏïö V¢ ÚÆ‚ 'Ëj ~ºæ –Ò~& . Fig. 10f  .‚B, v&æ GšöB '' ž Ö>‚ ßWj &~ ꚂWB‚B Tergitol NP-10" Brij 30 ö &š b ÒÏï" ꚂWB ³êö Vž ^¿Î"¢ ž ©š . ³ê ꚂWB¢ Òφ r Brij 30š Î "'š¢º ©f Fig. 6öB rj :f ? . ¾,  *~6š >º ꚂWB~ ³êº b ÒÏïš 10 L/kg (f = 0.1)¢ rº £ 4 g/L¢ r ¾æ¾æò, 5 L/kg(f = 0.2) ¢ rº £ 9 g/LöB ¾æÂ . V¢B, ³^¿j *‚ b~ ªV ‚'z ^BöBê š‚ ž V&š 'Ï> Ú¢ † ©š . Table 4öº Tergitol NP-10" Brij 30ö &š C b s/l. s/l. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003.

(10) 70. Ö߂Á;«^. Fig. 10. Different effect of surfactant according to soil/water ratio (fs/l) on washing of HOC (pyrene). (a) fs/l = 0.1. (b) fs/l = 0.2.. ÒÏïf 1 L, C ꚂWB ÒÏïf 5 g" 10 gö &š 1² ^¿" 2² ³^¿ Ö"¢ jv~& . ÒÏB v ꚂWB ÒÏïö &šB 1² ^¿ Brij 30~ ^¿Î "& z Ö>~& . ‚Þ, 2² ³ ^¿ž ãÖ, Ꚃ WB ÒÏïš 10 g/L¢ r Brij 30š z Î"'šîb¾, &³êž 5 g/L¢ ãÖ v ꚂWB Қ~ Nšº –~ ìî . šf ?š, b" ꚂWB ÒÏï 5 ^¿O» (³^¿ ²> )ö V¢ F;† ꚂWB~ «~& ¢î > ®j ©š . Æ·^¿ ;Jê‚~ wÏ J"B Æ·~ ÎN'ž ^¿ö ®Ú, ꚂWB~ « ~, Òϳê, ^¿O»j ‚'b‚ F;~V *šBº  &æ ž¶ ‚ ’W>Ú £² Ö;† > ì . š‚ ‚' O»~ Ö;j *šB Î –šö &š þj > ¯~º ©f *" ãB'ž B£š Vž . V¢B,  ’öB BB‚ Ξ(SURFREM)j ÒÏ~ ‚²‚~. þ–šV¢ V>b‚ ·‚ –šö &š .GŽb‚Ž .V Fê·ë" ‚' ^¿O»ö &‚ V&j B† > ®j ©š .  ΞöB jº‚ ~º æ> 8j ßWö V¢ ;Ò ~š j¾f ? . 4.5.. Fig. 11. Flowchart for optimal surfactant screening by model application for soil washing process.. .V J"Æ· –š: w , C , f 2) J"bî ç>: M , K , S 3) ꚂWB ç>: M , f , CMC, K , S , Q 4) Ú* æ>: D , D , ^¿²>, ^¿ªV *~ æ> 7 ¢¦º J"bî~ «~f ꚂWB~ «~ö Vž ^ò ¶ò‚¦V Ö;† > ®b¾, Æ·ö V ¢ ž ꚂWBf &NB ¢¦ ç> f(K , Q , S ). þj ۚB ’~¢ † ©š . Fig. 11öº š‚ Ξ" V. þ 5 {ž þj ۂ ¢N~ ";j ê‚ z~& . ꚂWB Fê ¢¦ ßWòb‚ F;~º ©f ¦ '.‚ Ö"¢ .¾† > ® . .¢ š, f ;W ³ êž CMC, Æ· ‡Oïž Q , ꚂWB &j HOC Ïšêž WSR ~ ‚ &æòb‚ 6† ãÖ *Ú ^ ¿Î"fº ž Ö"¢ áj > ®rj {ž~& . ö ò jî¢, CMC(s)f ?f ž¶ö &šBê îR& æš . .¢ Ú, K /K 8f fš šÒ† r Æ ·ö &‚ ‡çªV ê>¢ ’² ~º ©b‚ ~¾~ ï 1). w,j. soil. s,j,ini. ow,j. w. w,s. w. c,m. oc,s. m. cmc. max. s. m. max. cmc. max. m. d,cmc. Table 4. HOC (pyrene) removal by two successive washings using different amount of total surfactant. Tergitol NP-10 Brij 30 Number of washing 1 2 1 2 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 Ds (g/L) − − 57.3 35.4 − − 74.1 32.5 Cs,j (50%)a (mg/kg) Cs,j (100%)a (mg/kg) 35.5 20.1 27.6 11.3 32.5 15.3 27.2 7.3 a Remaining pyrene in soil after 50% or 100% use of total surfactant. The surfactant usage was equally allotted for successive washings. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003.

(11) J"Æ· ^¿;öB Ξçj ۂ ‚' ꚂWB~ Fê. &æ‚& F > ®º ž¶š . š 8f Triton X-100, Tergitol NP-10, Igepal CA-720, Brij 30 ''ö &š 948, 1627, 1054, 1386b‚ Tergitol NP-10š &Ë ±f ©b‚ ¾æÒ . ¾, „öB ÚÚ :f ?š J®J Brij 30š z Î"'¢ > ®º Ö"¢ áf : ® . V¢B, ­­ ï&æ‚ö ~š 6~º © *Ú ʂ~ Î ž ï&¢ ۚ ‚« Ö"‚ ï&~º ©š :²ç† © š .  Ξf ꚂWB/Æ·/b ʂöB J"bî~ ªV¢ V'š *²zB Ξj ÒÏ~& . V¢B, šö Vž B J"Æ· Ö"f~ Nšº > J> Ú¢ † ©š . 6‚, B J"Æ·~ ãÖ J"bîš ~¾ šç~ 'ž ©š &¦ªš– š rº &‚bî j F;~ *ÖÎÒ¢ >¯~  Ö"~ ‚ê6j  j† jº& ®j ©š . ‚Þ, ^¿²>& Ã&†>ƒ ÎNf Ã&~¾ B Æ· ^¿ö ®Ú ·ëš ®–‚f î > ®bæ‚ ‚' ²>~ Ö;f ãBW" ^¿ ς ~ö V¢ –.† jº& ®j ©š . 5.. Ö †.  ’öBº J"Æ· ^¿j *‚ ꚂWB¢ Ò Ï~º ʂö &‚ ï;&ê¢ .G~º Ξj BB ~ *ÖÎÒ¢ ۚ  ßûj ªC~& . ^¿Î"¢ &z~V *‚ ꚂWB F;O»" ^¿O»j jv ªC~ r" ?f Ö"¢ áî . 1. ꚂWB& Î&B Æ· ÒÒ ʂöB ²> W FšFVbî~ ªV¢ .G† > ®º Ξj >ã~ &, *ÖÎÒ Ö" ·‚ ꚂWB ³êö Vž * ;'ž *çj ’*† > ®rj ¦Ã† > ®î . 2. ÿ¢‚ Cï~ ꚂWB¢ Òφ r b~ Î&ï š Ã&~z¢ê ^¿Î"~ Ã& Î"¢ V&~V Ú[  J®J jÏÃ&ò .¾† > ®bæ‚, ^¿š &Ë ‚ >&öB ‚²‚~ bj ÒÏ~º ©š F҆ ©š. . ÿ¢‚ Cï~ b 5 ꚂWB¢ Òφ ãÖ 1² ^ ¿ ³ ^¿š z Î"'šîb–, ³ ^¿öB b " ꚂWB¢ ÿ¢~² ªV~º ©š ‚'šî . 3. ÒÏB 4 «~ jšNW ꚂWB 7öB Tergitol NP-10f Æ· ‡Oïš ' º 6öB Ö>‚ >š, Brij 30f Æ· ‡Oïš ‚&š¾ f ;Wê Ϛê Ã& GšöB Î"'šî . V¢B, b" ꚂWB ÒÏï 5 ^¿O»(³^¿ ²> )ö V¢ ꚂWB~ Π˚ ¢î > ®rö "~& jº† ©š .. 71. 4. ꚂWB Fê ¢¦ ï&æ‚ö ~š 6† ã Ö ¦'.‚ Ö"¢ .¾† > ®bæ‚ *Ú ʂ~ *ÖÎÒ¢ ۚ «'ž Ö"‚ ï&~º ©š :²ç † ©š . 5.  ’öB BBB Ξ *‚Îf J"Æ· ^¿ ;~ Jê ǂ þj >¯~V š*ö ꚂW B «~~ Fê, ‚' b 5 ꚂWB ÒÏï Ö;, ‚ ' ^¿²> Ö;ö ‚ÏF > ®j ©š .. 6Ò~ &  ’º 2002jê vG¦ BK21 ßzÒë æöö ~ š >¯>îb–, šö 6Òãî .. ÒϦ^ Caq,j : concentration of HOC in aqueous pseudophase (mg j/L liquid) Cl,j : concentration of HOC dissolved in liquid phase (mg j/L liquid) II Cl,j,ini. : concentration of HOC in aqueous phase without surfactant (mg j/L liquid). Cl,s : concentration of surfactant dissolved in liquid phase (g surfactant/L liquid) Cl,mic : concentration of micelle in liquid phase (g surfactant/L liquid) Cl,mon : concentration of surfactant as monomer in liquid phase (g surfactant/L liquid) Cmic,j : concentration of HOC in micelle (mg j/L liquid) Cs,j : concentration of HOC sorbed to soil (mg j/kg soil) Cs,j,ini : concentration of HOC in contaminated soil (mg j/kg soil) Cs,s ; concentration of surfactant sorbed to soil (g surfactant/kg soil) Ct,j : total concentration of HOC in system (mg j/L liquid) Ct,s : total concentration of surfactant in system (g surfactant/L liquid) CMC : critical micelle concentration in pure liquid (g surfactant/L liquid) CMC(s) : critical micelle concentration when soil exists (g surfactant/L liquid) Ds : surfactant dose (g surfactant/L) Dw : water dose (L water/kg soil) Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003.

(12) Ö߂Á;«^. 72. Es : surfactant efficiency for HOC solubilization (g−1). Vw : molar volume of water in a system (L/mol). F : bulk solution fraction of HOC mass in soil/aqueous. WSR : weight solubilization ratio (g j/g surfactant). system (−) fc,m : weight fraction of carbon in surfactant molecule (g carbon/g molecule) foc,s : organic carbon fraction in original soil (g organic carbon/g soil) * foc,s. : organic carbon fraction in soil after sorption of. Xa : mole fraction of HOC in aqueous pseudophase (−) Xm : mole fraction of HOC in micellar pseudophase (−). ε : effectiveness factor relating effectiveness of organic carbon of surfactant to that of soil organic matter as sorbent (−). ωsoil : weight of soil (kg soil). chemicals (g organic carbon/g soil). νaq : volume of aqueous solution in system (L liquid). fs/l : fraction of soil in liquid (kg soil/L liquid). ^^ò. Kd,cmc : soil-phase/aqueous-pseudophase partition coefficient of HOC for soil/aqueous system at CMC(s) (L liquid/kg soil) Kd : partition coefficient of HOC between soil and liquid (L liquid/kg soil) Kd,s : partition coefficient of surfactant between soil and liquid at sub-CMC (L liquid/kg soil) Kd,subcmc : partition coefficient of HOC between soil and liquid at sub-CMC (L liquid/kg soil) Kd,surf : solid/bulk solution partition coefficient of HOC for solid/aqueous system at above CMC(s) (L liquid/kg soil) Km : micellar phase/aqueous-pseudophase partition coefficient of HOC (−) Kow,j : octanol/water partition coefficient of HOC (L water/ L octanol) mmic : mass of surfactant in micelle form in system (mol surfactant) Mi : molecular weight of HOC (i=j), surfactant (i=s), or water (i=w) (g/L) mtot : total mass of surfactant in system (g surfactant) MSR : molar solubilization ratio (mol j/mol surfactant) naq,j : mass of HOC in aqueous phase of soil/aqueous system (mol j) nsorb,j : mass of HOC in sorbed phase of soil/aqueous system (mol j) nmic,j : mass of HOC in micellar phase of system after addition of surfactant (mol j) Qmax : concentration of soil-sorbed surfactant at CMC (g surfactant/kg soil) Sw : total apparent solubility of HOC in pure liquid (mg j/L) Scmc : total apparent solubility of HOC at CMC(mg j/L) Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003. 1. Cookson, J.T. Jr. Bioremediation Engineering: Design and Application, McGraw-Hill (1995). 2. Cerniglia, C.E. “Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons”, Biodegradation, 3, pp. 351-368 (1992). 3. Keith, L.H. and Telliard, W.A. “Priority pollutants: I-a perspective view”, Environ. Sci. Technol., 13, pp. 416-423 (1979). 4. West, C.C. and Harwell, J.F. “Surfactant and subsurface remediation”, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, pp. 2324-2330 (1992). 5. Kile, D.E. and Chiou, C.T. “Water solubility enhancement of DDT and trichlorobenzene by some surfactants below and above the critical micelle concentration”, Environ. Sci. Technol., 23, pp. 832-838 (1989). 6. Volkering, F., Breure, A.M., and Rulkens, W.H. “Microbiological aspects of surfactant use for biological soil remediation”, Biodegradation, 8, pp. 401-417 (1998). 7. “ : ”, , 8, pp. 47-60 (1997). 8. , Ghosh, M.M., “ PAH ”, , 19(9), pp. 1111-1124 (1997). 9. Myers, D. Surfactant Science and Technology, 2nd ed., VCH Publishers, Inc.(1992). 10. Edwards, D.A., Luthy, R.G., and Liu, Z. “Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in micellar nonionic surfactant solutions”, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, pp. 127-133 (1991). 11. Liu, Z., Edwards, D.A., and Luthy, R.G. “Sorption of nonionic surfactants onto soil”, Water Res., 26, pp. 1337-1345 (1992). 12. Edwards, D.A, Adeel, Z., and Luthy, R.G. “Distribution of nonionic surfactant and phenanthrene in a sediment/aqueous system”, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, pp. 1550-1560 (1994). 13. Edwards, D.A., Liu, Z., and Luthy, R.G. “Surfactant solubi-. ‚ç¢ J"Æ· ;z¢ ۂ æ~> J" Oæ Æ·^¿ V»j 7b‚ æ’~ã’²¢^÷ "› ns ꚂWB¢ šÏ‚ J"B Æ·b‚¦V~ ~ ^¿ &‚~ã²æ.

(13) J"Æ· ^¿;öB Ξçj ۂ ‚' ꚂWB~ Fê lization of organic compounds in soil/aqueous systems”, J. Environ. Eng., 120, pp. 5-22 (1994). 14. Edwards, D.A, Liu Z., and Luthy, R.G. “Experimental data and modeling for surfactant micelles, HOCs, and soil”, J. Environ. Eng., 120, pp. 23-41 (1994). 15. Zheng, Z. and Obbard, J.P. “Evaluation of an elevated non-ionic surfactant critical micelle concentration in a soil/aqueous system”, Water Res., 36, pp. 2667-2672 (2002). 16. Sun, S., Inskeep, W.P., and Boyd, S.A. “Sorption of nonionic organic compounds in soil-water systems containing a micelleforming surfactant”, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29(4), pp. 903-. 73. 913 (1995). 17. Park, J.-W. and Boyd, S.A. “Sorption of chlorobiphenyls in sediment-water systems containing nonionic surfactants”, J Environ. Qual., 28(3), pp. 945-952 (1999). 18. Schwarzenbach, R.P., Gschwend, P.M., and Imboden, D.M. Environmental Organic Chemistry, John, Wiley & Sons, New York (1993). 19. Karickhoff, S.W., Brown, D.S., and Scott, T.A. “Sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments”, Water Res., 13, pp. 241-248 (1979).. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61~73, 2003.

(14)

참조

관련 문서

L: mass flowrate of Liquid phase V: mass flowrate of Vapor phase N: Number of stages. k: mass transfer coefficient A, B, C …

The oxygen concentration with the air flowrate (Q g ) and liquid flowrate (Q L ) was identical but the oxygen transfer coefficient (K L ·a) is linear depending on degree of

Extraction of theanine with ATPS could be realized in different concentrations of WLTPP (Table 1), and the phase ratio R and the partition coefficient of theanine K

The monthly NDVI images were classified into L = 54 cluster using ISODATA algorithm and these L clusters were assigned to K = 7 classes, which were labelled into the classes

It is likely that the apatite grain size between 0.42 mm (No. 100 seive) with a flow rate of 60.43 x 10 -4 l/min/kg (reaction time of 165 minutes per one liter of this