• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

::á#ÃHåQ#ÆëÌ#:#O á#/Œ#6¨#

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "::á#ÃHåQ#ÆëÌ#:#O á#/Œ#6¨#"

Copied!
6
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Demo

1. #g«#

Þân(fluoropolymer, fluoride resin)ê Fò ª¯W žk‡, 6~ Jžk‡, ^F‡R – † nÒ lê 6Úæ n²,1-3 :.4 Þ, k ÿ‹fÊ 330 ×& B®B VÖÚ® :Î k‡

6Úæ â:J: *GÞ è– ÿ‹ ~Ò V6 ޚ  š

Ò,56~ JÚÊ ~ C2 B® 6Úæ â:J: VW’

W, þJ²W ÂÆ& ®² ² †þ Æ/š Jڒ²¾, æ† z²‡Ê êÂnê WÛ® ª[ ÚÒ&r ÞânV 

* ² Êk‡R z²‡š " ª[ "² ÿn³ ®6 Þ :.6,7 ʖ o– V²WÎ ^², Þânê R öR o– †

ÖÞ ÚÒ, K†ÿ k†– o– Š†† ÚÒ, Z†:N

e Rÿ†– o– VZ†† ÚÒ® ²Ê ª[r²r ÿn6 Þ :. Þânê ÒnW’² Table 1& kr j– oÊ ª¯W >

Z® ÚæÂÆ& ®®B polytertrafluoro ethylene(PTFE), perfluoroalk- oxy(PFA), ethylene tetrafluoroethylene(ETFE), (FEP)fluoroethylenepropyl ene n G’² ÂÚ®Æ, 6~ ÿ® ²Ê ª[r²ê R² 300 × Ê® ‹fš lê PTFE n– PFA nV ÿr:.8 Ê: PTFE n– PFA nê û† Fã ÿ ~V 260 ×& B

®B JΪ& VÊ k² ‡š JÊê ْ² ¢zŽ ޒî, :ÿWÎ ®N²r û† J‡& V®B FÂr J6ê $  

’Æ, Þ Væ:® Æ& ®®Ê ^㠆 ª[’²r® û†

Ê: 6~ÿ ÞânV lê J‡ ª[r²r® †vW g ꇚ 6z¶ ¢, FÂ& V² šê‡® ÖÇJ:ê J‡ ª[

ê ْ² 3Wr:. N Væ:– PTFE n šÚ(film, 300 .m)R PFA n ^ã ª[(coating film, 25 µm)š V’², û† JΪ

& ®² ’ª¯W ‡ e ²Ê ‡® ªÒ Vw®† Z²

::á#ÃHåQ#ÆëÌ#:#O á#/Œ#6¨#

»g./..}£/£.} ›..}§SL../%#

.éè(™# ÄÐ5™</#..œ­^™¬# ðq (|p#

+5337T# 44# 58¼# Q:/#5338T# 4# 47¼# T,#

#

Lqyhvwljdwlrq#lqwr#wkh#Wkhupdo#Vwdelolw|#ri#

Ioxrursro|phu#Frdwlqj#iru#Khdw0Uhvlvwdqw#Dssolfdwlrq#

Kh|0Mlq#Fkr*/**/#Mxkzdq#U|x*/#Grr0Mlq#E|xq**/#dqg#Nlo0\hrqj#Fkrl**/%

*Department of Polymer Engineering, Chungnam National University, 220, daeduk, Daejeon 305-764, Korea

**Reliability of Assessment Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 305-600, Korea (Received November 25, 2004;accepted January 14, 2005)

S¨Ü PTFE e PFA G® Þânê ²V Fã ÿ ~V 260 ×& B®ê 6~ J‡ 6Úæ â²r, N F Â&r nßr 280 ×, 7R Z® JΪ& ®Êr ÿÚ² JW žk‡Ê v~š Vw®V:. NBî †W k

, ‹f e JÚÊ r2 ~ G® âW ’‡Ê v~š ®N®ê †² JW žk‡– N FÂ&r nßr ª [’²r® ²Êg_W, NŽ *ŽöZ, úÂ Ús& ®² ëš †V®Ê ÿÚ® ®:ê ÙÊ «Î Rê BW² ²Ê *ŽöZ® æR ^ã†& V² g{® æ:š W®6 Þ:.

Abstract:Fluoropolymer of PTFE and PFA etc. is a heat resistance polymeric material that it is known as that maximum continuous use temperature reaches for 260 Ž. It was observed that these polymers had the enough thermal stability so enough that it was kept by thermal aging of 280 Ž/7 weeks too in this study. However, such thermal stability means that bulk material property is kept such as mechanical strength, melting point and initial pyrolysis temperature etc. If these polymers are evaluate by coating property such as surface contact angle, surface morphology, surface scratch, thing that heat resistance is not enough was confirmed in this study. Thermal aging of flouropolymer coating was achieved by gear aging oven that the exchange rate of air was controlled, and the analysis results were indicating serious damage of surface morphology and adhesive strength on metal substrate.

Keywords: thermal stability, fluoropolymer coating, interface adhesion.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kychoi@krict.re.kr

G

(2)

:ç² :.š Zr®V’Æ, Þân ª[® û† J‡š : ÿW †V’² V®6æ ®V:. Þ N FÂ&rê ÒnW’

² 6Úæ n® J‡š V®ê 뒲 †W k, JÚ Ê r2 ~, ‹f, k Vû† 3‡ G® ªÒ Vw®ê ë Î&, ª[r²r® ²Ê ‡š Z² ²Ê g_W e úÂî

®‡, ²Ê NŽ ÂÆ Gš Vw®B Þân ª[® J 

‡š Vw®V:.

2. /#

2.1 Ó×c Ï Z Ÿ2

J‡ Þân ª[® JΪ ‡š F®† Z®B, 300 µm ¦.® Þân šÚR 25 µm ¦.® Þân ª[® ¦ V 2"Ò v3®B, rn² šÚ  Þân– ^㠆 ª[

 Þân® JΪ ‡š š¦®B Ús®V:. Þân š ږ /ç Z¶¢Â(R)&r rƲ sheet  šÚ’², gà /

6Úæâ(R)&r rÆr 6 180·80 .m Ûæ †® PTFE n

 Ú&š 300»400 kg/cm2®  Z «F²  Jî®B

^ VK² šÚÊ:. ^㠆 ª[– 2kK(R)&r rÆ

² PFA n ª[’², F&r rKr PFA nÒ ¢>NÚ

†® ^ã f& 6 25·5 µm ¦.² Ê3 û î² Þâ n ª[Ê:.

2.2 ?ß tà

JΪê Jª& ®² Wûš 6z®B K† ®®~Ê Æ^

nê †3 Ϊ2.†Ò ÿ®B 7RZ nß®V:. 2.&  ÿ² 2.†ê ÒN Yasuda Seisakusho® Ϊ2.† þÎ 102-SHF- SÒ ÿ®V’Æ, 2. g® K† ®®~– 2ZO 4»7â² Æ

^®V6 Ϊ ~ê 160R 280 ×Ò v3®B 1R, 3R, 5R, 7R Zÿ® Ϊ 2Z’² nß®V:.

2.3 Ãð'# Z ?Ïh

Þân šÚ® Îû k– 6~ wk– Instron® Universal Tes- ting Machine þÎ 5567š ÿ®V’Æ, 2 k2ê KS M3054&

²†r 2Žk 2š ÿ®V:. Cross-head speedê ASTM D 882

& V®B 500 mm/min® ã² wk®V6, 6r 2® 6 h’

² ÆÊ†Ò Vw®V:.

2~RJ(DSC) Ús– TA instrument® þÎ DSC 2910 þ Κ ÿ®B, 10 ×/min® ~ã² 400 ×¢ VJ®ê ë

’² â ÚZ† ®&r wk®V6, JŠâÚs(TGA) Ús–

TA Instrument® þÎ TGA 2950š Êÿ®B 10 ×/min® ~ã

² 700 ×¢ VJ®ê 뒲 â ÚZ† ®&r wk®V :. JΪ& ®² ªÒ š¦®† ZÊ ÿr Þân šÚR

^㠆 ª[– W Þân ²ÊÖ(»100 m)® nÒ Ê

ö e ʲš ÿ² k š> 뒲 Vš®V:.

2.4 \TL l` Z LÃkÏ\ Ïh

g_W wk– 768Ý576® ÊN ÊÒ lê SEO 300A þÎ

š ÿ®B, ó®n®  ֒V 6 10 µLV n³ Æ^®

ê 뒲 nßn:. Æʆ® wk– R Þân šÚ e ª[& V®B 10â® wkš nß² ® 6hš ê ë’

² nßn:.

WÎvÚg Ús– JΪ& ®² Þân šÚ® ²ÊÖ Jª Ò Vw®† Z®B Nicolet® þÎ Magna 550 e IR Plan Advan- tageÒ ÿ®V’Æ, JΪ& ®®B JW æÊ 'gnš 2

" ²ÊÖ(»50 m) n"š Êö e ʲš ÿ®B k2þ , ZN IR Vw ë& ®² resolution 4 cm-1, 128â scan® wk Æʒ² Ús®V:.

2.5 OÛOC K{ Z ï·ã£ '#

ZæZN V†– VVãZ«&r 6†~® V†Ê Vû² cold gun type® FE-SEMÎ JEOL® þÎ JSM-6700F þΚ ÿ

®V’Æ, wk Æʖ WD 8 mm, 5 keV&r 1000†~² V†®

V:.

úÂî® :.– CETR® úÂî® 2.† þÎ UMT-2Ò ÿ

®V6, n 0.4 cm® ^öš V úÂî® spindleš ÿ®V :. Spindle® Ê/ Æê 10 mm, Ê/ãê 1 mm/min, n Ö®

®g(Fz)– 5&r 200 g¢ Òk®â Ö®Ò óV®ê ëš  ÿ®B úÂî® VÃ{(Fx)R †nÒ wk ®V:.

3. ûG Z ë«

ân æV lê ’ª¯W žk‡R Þân– ^㠆

n Þ:. N FÂ& ÿr PTFE n– PFA nê V²WÎ J‡ Þân ª[r²r, 260 ×® Fã ÿ ~– 300»330 ×

® ÿ‹ ~Ò V6 Þ:. N FÂ&rê û† J‡š V

®† Z² JΪ 2. ~² 280 ×Ò v3®V6, š¦ 2.

~²r 160 ×Ò êV®B v3®VêÆ, :W’² Þân

ª[rÞ VÖÚ® 6~ ÿ ~ê 160»280 ×® êZV v Ù

’² f>®V:. $– 6Úæ n® JΪV K† g® â–

g_Ê Ê>ê ²ÊÖ& 'gnê +Ê Þ’²,9,10

B 1, 3, 5, 7R® Zÿ’² 7RZ V†®ê 뒲 ßn:.

300 µm ¦.® PTFE n šÚ’² nßr Þân šÚ® J Ϊ& ®² †W ’‡ ª® ç–, Figure 1Ê JB Rê ÙR oÊ Îû k e 6~® ª² b›nêÆ, 160R 280 ×® ¦ V JΪ ÆÊ þ¦&r JΪ 2ZÊ R¶n³ Îû k

Table 1. Typical Properties of Teflon Fluoropolymers

Property Teflon PTFE Teflon PFA Teflon ETFE Teflon FEP

Specific G ravity, g/cm3 2.15 2.15 1.76 2.15

Tensile Strength, psi 3000b5000 3600 5800b6700 3400

Elongation, % 300b500 300 150b300 325

H ardness, Shore D 50b65 60 72 56

Taber A brasion, m g. cycle 12 - - 14.8

C oefficient of Friction Static, D ynam ic

0.12b0.15 0.05b0.10

0.2 -

0.24b0.5 0.3b0.4

0.12b0.20 0.08b0.3 C ontact A ngle, w ater, degrees 104b111 104b111 90b100 95b105

M elting Point, ~ 327 306 267 260

C ure Tem perature, ~ 379b429 379b399 302b323 360b385 M ax, U se Tem p,~

C ontinuous, Interm ittent 260, 316 260, 288 149, 199 204, 232 Therm al C onductivity,W /m .k 0.5 0.19 0.24 0.20

Therm al Expansion, ppm /~ 100

Water A bsorption, % in 24 hr <0.01 <0.03 <0.03 <0.01

M V TR ,g/100 sq - - - 0.40

(3)

– 6~Ê š"®â óV®ê ûš JB b’²¾ 280 ×/7RZ

® JΪ ÆÊ ®&r, :.r Þân® ’W, ª¯W ‡

Ê ÿÚÞ vn6 Þ¢š î6 Þ:. JΪ 2Z R&

†Î k– 6~® óV Z–, Þân šÚ® JΪ Rk

&r vrv n Þê Þân® ª¯W Jª& ®² ÚæZ V¦

¿11Bê ÒÖ ² â‡r ÛæZ® ‹& ®² 6~ â þR Ò &Β² 3W¶ n Þ:.

280 ×&r 7RZ JΪr Þân šÚR ª[® ²ÊÖ&

r 2"Ò š>®B nßr 2~RJ Ús Rê, Figure 2

&r JBR6 Þê ÙR oÊ, Þân šÚ® &ê JΪ î& ®² ªV ¢š JBRê Ù& n®B, ª[® 

&ê JΪ î& ®®B ÿ‹ ~ e kªV óV®ê çš JBR6 Þ:. Êê Þân šÚRê B, ª[– J Ϊ î& ®®B n Ö® kªV êVW’² ßn

¢š îê ْ², ÊO nV ÞÿÚ² Jî Ê{š V

6 Þ¢š îê ÙÊ:.12 ÊB² Ês– ² ßr ÊO ª[ 2"® 2~RJ& ®² VJ e W® r®

:.š ®B 1~ VJ® ‹fR 2~ VJ® ‹f e W k ª ~V WW 310.0, 312.2, 287.5 ײ  R– î Ö¿®

ê ÙÊ:. NBî JŠâ Ús& ®² JÚÊ Æ/® Ús Rê

šÚR ª[ þ¦&r JÚÊ® r2 ~(onset temperature)–

²V ÚÊ ~ G&r Æ ªV ¢š «Î®ê ÙÊ:. J Ϊ îr šÚ® †² JÚs Rê V¦¿ Bê Úæ

^> G® ª¯W Jª® +V ¢š JB Rê ْ²,13,14 Figure 1® Îû’‡ óVV Jª& ®² V¦¿ ¢ŽÒ Vû‡

š †rö³ ®ê ÙÊ:.

²Ê Êk‡– Þân ª[&r †V®ê gê² ²Ê 

‡ g® ®î², N FÂ&rê JΪ  ª[ ²Ê& k‡r ó®n ® g_W® ª²¾ Ê® ‡ ªÒ V®6æ

®V:. Figure 3Ê JB Rê j– oÊ JΪ 2Z& †Î g_

W ª ç– ZW’²ê Æ ªÒ JB R  ê ÙÊ", ª[®  3R¢® ^† JΪ †Z g&ê ÓZ® g_

W óVÒ JB R:V, Ê 7R& ÊÊÊ :â fâ®ê û Ê îî6 Þ:. ÊB² ª® ç– g_W® wk z~ê Z(·2) e 2" BêZ(·3)Ò 6z¶ ¢, Vwr Þân

²Ê® ÚÛ² ’ª¯W Jª Bê ªÒ nW®ê ْ²

15-19

Þâ n® JªV â Ê ®& ßv  –COOH(1810 e 1760 cm-1) e –COF(1860 cm-1)o– ªr Vû†Ò WÎvÚg Ús úïR &r «Î¶ n Þ:. Figure 4ê Þân ª[

® JΪ Z® ²ÊÖ WÎvÚgÚs úïRš 2500»1700 cm-1 êZ&r š¦² ْ², N :.® JΪ& ®®B ª[

® ²ÊÊ ª¯W’² Jªn:ê +V :ê ٚ «Î

®6 Þ:. Ê Vw Rê Figure 2® 2~RJ Ús e Figure 1. Influence of thermal aging time on the tensile strength (:, ;)

and the elongation (1, 0) of fluoro- polymer (PTFE) film at 160 × (:, 1) and 280 × (;, 0).

# 3# 4# 5# 6# 7# 8# 9# :# ;#

Time (week) Tensile strangth (kgf/cm2) :#

9#

8#

7#

6#

5#

4#

3#

Elongation (%)

733#

633#

533#

433#

3#

Figure 2. Changes in melting behavior of fluoro-polymers by thermal aging. Non-aged vs aged sample at 280 × / 7 weeks. (a) Fluoropolymer (PTFE) film and (b) Fluoropolymer (PFA) coating.

# 583# 5:3# 5<3# 643# 663# 683#

Temperature (×) (a)

Heat flow (W/g)

0315#

0317#

0319#

031;#

0413#

0415#

0417#

# 583# 5:3# 5<3# 643# 663# 683#

Temperature (×) (b)

Heat flow (W/g)

0315 0319 031;

0413 0415

Figure 3. Influence of thermal aging time on the contact angle of fluoropolymer (PTFE) film (1, 0) and fluoropolymer (PFA) coating (;) at 160 × (1) and 280 × (0, ;).

3# 4# 5# 6# 7# 8# 9# :# ;#

Time (week)

Contact angle (°)

473#

463#

453#

443#

433#

<3#

;3#

:3#

(4)

JŠâÚs GÊ Ûó² JÚs® R– Ö¿®ê ْ², 7RZ

® JΪ& ®®B 2.r ª[® ²Ê& ª¯W Jª® +

V :ê ٚ ~ «Î®ê ÙÊ:. ʖ oÊ ª[® ²Ê&

ª¯W Jª® óÆV 6, ª®B Þân® ²Êg_W– ª

¯W Jª& Rf®  :ê ÙÊ ¢zŽ ކ ¢Ž&,20 Figure 3

&r JBV ª[® g_W ªê ª[® ²Ê þJ² ®

ªÒ ®N®ê ’W ª& †Î² ْ² 궶 n Þ:.

Figures 5– 6– WW Þân šÚR ª[® JΪ 2Z

& †Î ²Ê þJ²® ªÒ V†² ْ²¾, Figure 5&r JBRê šÚ® ²Ê þJ²® ª– Figure 6&r JBRê ª[® ²Ê þJ²® ªê O² ~ÊÒ JBR6 Þ:.

Figure 5® šÚ ²Ê&ê Òk ZÿR ûš V NŽ² ²Ê úÂî®Ò K W’² JBR6 ÞêÆ, šÚ VK 2® ^ ú Â f>r:. †Òr Êê JΪ® RkRê ŠV®Æ, Z nW’² JΪ& ®² Æ þJ² ® ªê JÊ  6 Þ

’î, JΪV 7R& ÊÊÊ ²ÊÖ& NŽ² kÆW(flake):

Ê k‡nê NÓ² ªV «Îr:. N& n®B Figure 6® ª [– JΪ ÊZ& ÊN NŽ² –(hole)R Â^Ê(craze)V

®B O’ ’Ê kn kªnê þJ² ® Æ ªV îî6 Þ:. Êê šÚ e â ® ÞânV ‡k g® â

 Rk&r Æ «ë «{š qêÆ n®B, ª[ rÆ Rk&

ŽrfÊ nWr ْ² JÊÆ, Ê Figure 2(b)V ®N®ê J î Rk& Þr® ÖDz â þR Wûš Rš ْ² f>r:. †¶ "² ª® ç– JΪ ^†& zÞz Æ

’ k e kªV V†n6, 3R ʲê Ϊ 2ZÊ  R®Êr ’® kª e kªV nNB: 7R& ÊÊBr ê :2 ²Êê ûš JBRê ÙÊ:. ÊB² ª® ç

–, Figure 3&r îò ª[® g_W ª® çR o–, ó V  fâ® ç’²r Þân® ²ÊÊ ’W’² Jªn ²Ê ƶ†V óV®Ê ²Ê&r® ²n‡ g_š Óª2r g_WÊ óV²:ê J6²Ö†,21 zÛ Vû² ÊvÒ ”š n Þ:. ʖ o– ª[® kª e ²Ê ƶ†® óV &Β

²ê, ª[ Öښ ʲ’² ^ Ú®B wk² JŠâ gÚsë(TGA)® Ús RV JBRê ÙîR, ª[& B

¾r N® nr‡ ’(400 ×Ê® nr ¾š †V’² 1.4%, Þân šÚ® &ê 0.1%)Ê JΪ î& ®®B †ªn

rΠْ² 3WnÆ, Ê ⇠¿Ê ÖÇÞ® kr ÆW :Ê JΪ î g® JW ⪠þR& ®®B ²Ê þJ²

V ²Êê Rkš JBRê ْ² 3Wr:. Ž6² Ê ª [& ÿr Þân(PFA)® ÿ‹ ~ê 310.0 ×, kª ~

ê 292.7 ײ Vwn:.

ª[– ^㠆&®  k2ʲ šÚ"Ò †W ’‡Ê lê ®NV gê2n  š n Þ:. nÊ& ª[r& Þrê

^㠆& V² g{® vV gê² ’W ‡Ê nî, Ê& V² V e FÂÒ nß¾& Þ ª[r® ^㠆&

V² Ê g{š k«Þ wk¶ n Þê vþ² ëÊ ~

Figure 4. Formation of hydroxyl group at fluoro-polymer surface by thermal aging, non-aged (--) and aged (-) at 280 ×/7weeks.

Transmittance (%)

#5933# 5633# 5333# 4:33#

Wavenumbers (cm-1)

Figure 5. Surface images of fluoropolymer(PTFE) film after thermal aging at 280 × (Ý1,000). (a) non-aged (b) aged for 1 week, (c) aged for 3 weeks, and (d) aged for 7 weeks.

Figure 6. Surface images of fluoropolymer (PFA) coating after thermal aging at 280 × (Ý1,000). (a) non-aged, (b) aged for 1 week, (c) aged for 3 weeks, and (d) aged for 7 weeks.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(5)

r úÂî® 2.†Ò22ÿ² Þân ª[® ‡ wk 2 .–, Figure 7&r JB R6 Þê j– oÊ ª[® JΪ&

RÒ r2®6 Þ:. Figure 7(a)ê JΪ Z® Þân ª[&

V² úÂî® 2.® RÒ JBRê ْ²¾, úÂî® &¾ (spindle)& V² nÖ® ®gš ^† 5 g&r 200 g¢ vW’

² óV2 ¢ 2.2Z 116^ ÖRš †V’² †VÃ{(Fx)R

†n® çÊ ª®ê ٚ «Î®â r:. ^† ÂZ&r JBRê Æ †nê &¾Ê ²Ê® Þân ª[ ‹& ¾Û

¾& ÖVnê VÃ{Ê nWr ÙÊÆ, Ê ÂZ&rê &¾®

^㠆& V² † e þ&® VÃ{š nW®ê ç6 ¶Î

C /R ãWÎ óV® çÊ îî6 Þ:. ß, ÂZš

ÂÚ®ê †V2Z Z® ªê úÂî® &¾® ª[ ‚R&

®² ªÒ nW®ê ْ²¾, †V2ZVê &¾Ê ª[R

^㠆 Ê® Ê& B®ê 2ZVÒ ®N®â nê ÙÊ :. Êê úÂî® 2.  g¯ZN’² «Î² úÂî® ² Ê V†® R– Ò®²:. JΪr ª[® úÂî® 2.

RÒ JBRê Figure 7(b)&r, 2.2Z 71^Ò †V’² †

² ¦ ÂZ’² îZ :.® ç– JΪ Z® ª[Ê JBRê NÙR Ââ :Ê  :. NBî ΪZ® ª[Ê 59.3 g® n®g& ®®B ‚RnêÆ n®B Ϊ® ª[

– 40.2 g® n®g& ®®B ‚Rnâ nÆ, ª[Ê ‚Rr

 &¾Ê n û’² ß®êÆ Îê VÃ{(Fx)Ê Îª

Z&ê 79.3 gÎÆ n®B Ϊ &ê 9.5 g& ÞR² ٖ JΪ

& ®®B Þân ª[® ^㠆& V² g{Ê Ââ J ªn¢š îê ÙÊ:. o– N& ²2r †n® 

&, Ϊ Z ª[– ª[Ê ‚Rr  Æ ªV ’î, Ϊ ® ª[– ª[Ê ‚Rr  Æ C® fâÒ JBb’

²¾, C2 JΪ& ®² ª[® g{ fâV nWn6 Þ:.

ª[Ê ‚Rr  ª[Ê íþ† 2ç®ê Úf&r® 

†VÃ{R †nê JΪ& ®®B ΪZ ÊO hJ: WW 1/8†– 1/5†² fâ®6 Þ:.

†Òr 7RZ® û† JΪê Þân ª[& V² JW â

ª Rkš êVW’² ß2þ þRV Þ’î ª[® ^ã

†& V² g{š Ââ Jª2úê ŽrfÊ nnr:.23

² ²Ê þJ² Vw e JÚs® R– úÂ 2.®

Rê WW êVWÎ Jî® šê‡R Jî& ®Ê vrv n Þê ª[® g{ JªÒ þrnâ r2®ê ÙÊr Þân® ª[ Rk&r ÞV’®â nnnê Jî Rk®

R®  – rV šê¾š Û‡Þ JBR6 Þ:.

4. û«

Þân šÚR ª[š V’² nßr N FÂê, Êk‡R z²‡ G® ‚Ž² ²Ê ‡Ê êÂnê 6~ÿ ²Ê ª[r

²r ÞânV lê û† Jžk‡š V®† Z®B nßn

:. šÚ’² nßr :. Rê, J‡ Þân® ²V F ã ÿ ~² Î3n6 Þê 260 ×Ò 6z¶ ¢ :W’² Wÿ Vû² ²6 ~Î 280 ×&r 7R(28Ò)Z® Ϊ Æʒ

²ê, 2.r J‡ ÞânV lê ’ª¯W ‡Ê Æ Žr

Ê vnê ٚ «Î®ê ÙÊ:. NBî ÞânÒ ª[

’² ÿ®6 Þê ª[r® &ê, /Ò² ÆÊ ®&r n

 æ® ®NÞê ª¯W Jª® nn Ê, BW² ²Ê þJ

²® Jª– ^㠆&® g{ V®V ß~š «Î®V :. N Rê, Þân® ª¯W J ~–ê :Î ®N&r, ª[r²r ÞânV lê J ~® ²– Þân® ª [ Rk& nn®ê Jî r® gꇚ JBR6 Þ:.

ƒ+S

1. G. Pompe, U. Lappan, and L. Häußler, Thermochimica Acta, 391, 257 (2002).

2. B. J. Briscoe, H. Mahgerefteh, and S. Suga, Polymer, 44, 783 (2003).

3. H.-H. Shim and O.-K. Kwon, Journal of KSTLE, 11, 28 (1995).

4. J. Zhang, L. Xu, X. Yu, and X. Liu, Mater. Lett., 56, 410, (2002).

5. D. M. Price and M. Jarratt, Thermochimica Acta, 392-393, 231 (2002).

6. C. B. Wang, M. F. Yan, and Y. Wang, Tribology International, 37, 645 (2004).

7. X.-C. Lu, S.-Z. Wen, J. Tong, Y.-T. Chen, and L.-Q. Ren, Wear, 193, 48 (1996).

8. J. J. Licari, Coating Materials for Electronic Applictions, Noyes Publications, William Andrew. Inc, p185 (2003).

9. P.-A. Eriksson, P. Boydell, K. Eriksson, J.-A. E. Manson, and A.-C.

Albertsson, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 65, 1619 (1997).

10. N. Piccirelli and M. E. R. Shanahan, Polymer, 41, 4077 (2000).

11. G. Peng and H. Geng, D. Tang, and S. He, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 69, 183 (2004).

Figure 7. Scratch test results of fluoropolymer (PFA) coating, (a) non- aged coating, (b) aged coating at 280 × / 7 weeks.

# 3# 433# 533# 633# 733#

Time (sec) (a)

Friction coefficient

518#

513#

418#

413#

318#

313#

Fz (g) 3#

83#

433#

483#

533#

Friction coefficient

518#

513#

418#

413#

318#

313#

Fz (g) 3#

83#

433#

483#

# 3# 433# 533# 633# 733#533#

Time (sec) (b)

(6)

12. W. Bürger and K. Lunkwitz, J. Fluorine Chem., 54, 80 (1991).

13. K. Schierhoz, U. Lappan, A. Peter, L. Dunsch, and K. Lunkwitz, J. Polym.

Sci.; Part B: Polym. Phys., 37, 2404 (1999).

14. L. Ferry, G. Vigier, R. Alexander-katz, and C .Garapon, J. Polym. Sci.;

Part B: Polym. Phys., 36, 2057 (1998).

15. U. Lappan, B. Fuchs, U. Geißler, U. Scheler, and K. Lunkwitz, Polymer, 43, 4325 (2002).

16. K. Schierholz, U .Lappan, and K. Lunkwiz, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B., 151, 232 (1999).

17. U. Lappan, U. Geißler, L. Häußler, D. Jehnichen, G. Pompe, and K.

Lunkwitz, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B., 185, 178 (2001).

18. D. Fischer, U. Lappan, I. Hopfe, K.-J. Eichhorn, and K. Lunkwitz, Polymer, 39, 573 (1998).

19. K. Lunkwitz, A. Ferse, H.-J. Brink, D. Handte, and U. Gross, J. Fluorine Chem., 29, 234 (1985).

20. N. V. Gitis, J. Xiao, and M. Vinogradov, Proceedings of 26th Annual Meeting of The Adhesion Society, 133 (2003).

21. K. Gotoh, Y. Nakata, M. Tagawa, and M. Tagawa, Colloid Surface A, 224,165 (2003).

22. N. Piccirelli and M. E. R. Shanahan, Polymer, 41, 4077 (2000).

23. J. Zhang, Q. Wu, X. Yu, P. Zha, and H. Li, Mater. Lett., 48, 362 (2001).

참조

관련 문서

In comparing the surface wettability of the scaffolds, the PCP-sp (contact angle of 0°) showed the highest wettability, followed by PCP-br (contact angle of 84°) and

This indicates' that substitution at para position does not affect the potential surface of the exciplex formation.. With these electron donors, the exciplex formation enthalphy

Finally, the quanti- tative properties by EDX spectra were examined, which observed homogeneous surface state as treated silver was removed and as the carbon fiber surface

The non- treated PDMS substrate showed hydrophobic properties with a contact angle of 110 o , and poor cell adhesion was observed on that surface.. Many adherent cells were

It has been determined that H2CO weakly binds (~6 kcal/mol) to the Ag(lll) surface in a geometry that the CO axis of formaldehyde is tilted away from the surface normal by 57°

The surface characteristics after molybdenum flame spray treatment in high tensile brass were quantitatively analyzed for surface composition, coating layer

In this study, the authors have studied the effect of pretreatment methods on the electrochemical properties, surface roughness, contact angle, and surface composition

- In the building, the assumption of gray surface gives excellent results for many cases. - A diffuse surface is one that emits in the same pattern as a