• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Sulfide Chimney from the Cleft Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge: Mineralogy and Fluid Inclusion

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Sulfide Chimney from the Cleft Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge: Mineralogy and Fluid Inclusion"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1) , 35, 3 , 203-210, 2002 Econ. Environ. Geol., 35(3), 203-210, 2002.    . .  

(2)  

(3)  .    

(4)  . . . . .   

(5)  . . . . Sulfide Chimney from the Cleft Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge: Mineralogy and Fluid Inclusion Chul-Ho Heo1, Seong-Taek Yun1*, Chil-Sup So1, Seung-Jun Youm1 and Kyeong-Yong Lee2 1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Korea Marine Resource Laboratory, Korea Ocean Reseach & Development Institute, Korea. 2. In order to elucidate the growth mechanism of sulfide chimney formed as a result of seafloor hydrothermal mineralization, we carried out the mineralogical and fluid inclusion studies on the inactive, sulfide- and silica-rich chimney which has been recovered from a hydrothermal field in the Cleft segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. According to previous studies, many active and inactive vents are present in the Cleft segment. The sulfide- and silica-rich chimney is composed of amorphous silica, pyrite, sphalerite and wurtzite with minor amounts of chalcopyrite and marcasite. The interior part of the chimney is highly porous and represents a flow channel. Open spaces within chimneys are typically coated with colloform layers of amorphous silica. The FeS content of Zn-sulfides varies widely from 13.9 to 34.3 mole% with Fe-rich core and Fe-poor rims. This variation possibly reflects the change of physicochemical characteristics of hydrothermal fluids. Chemical and mineralogical compositions of the each growth zone are also varied, possibly due to a thermal gradient. Based on the microthermometric measurements of liquid-rich, two-phase inclusions in amorphous silica that was precipitated in the late stage of mineralization, minimum trapping temperatures are estimated to be about 114o to 145oC with the salinities between 3.2 and 4.8 wt.% NaCl equiv. Although the actual fluid temperatures of the vent are not available, this study suggests that the lowtemperature conditions were predominant during the mineralization in the hydrothermal field at Cleft segment. Comparing with the previously reported chimney types, the morphology, colloform texture, bulk chemistry, and a characteristic mineral assemblage (pyrite + marcasite + wurtzite + amorphous silica) of this chimney indicate that the chimney have been formed from a relatively low-temperature (<250oC) hydrothermal fluid that was changed by sluggish fluid flow and conductive cooling..   seafloor hydrothermal mineralization, Cleft segment, sulfide chimney, mineralogy, fluid inclusions.   

(6)           !"# $   #% &' ()*+ , ./ 01' 2 345  6 7897 :;2 <=> ? :;# @    

(7) # A B )* 6 ()*  CD;/ ?E F45 GHI > :; 3  J5 (KL -.  MN OP:N 6 O7P:N 45 ;HI  QR *N 6 SMN T7 > 78U55 VKH  W1 >XL+Y (KL ZL -.5 [\HI > OP:N, O7P:N45 ;HI  P:+ 01'  TRB  ]2 G+Y M+ 01' ^_1` M+ 1a' :b12 cd> + 78 efg.f hi b51j kHl4.m nop>  W1  q erB f;s 6 ; t+5 k >u hvi GJ > w# xp (KL -.^ y3+ 01' 7897 345 / 6 z{ -| <' }, 78 Q 9~ €  

(8) .  .    

(9) . .  .   

(10)   .  . . . .  .  . . . !

(11)  ". . . . . . *Corresponding author: [email protected]. .

(12)  

(13)   ! !# +Y ‚ ƒ„€ $ !% " & '( +> - ;#% sDH 78 € †o2 ‡ c ˆ‰cŠ ‹ :;2 U%  x *Œ 3 f45  xr+ Ž csf+l ‘  >     W #% &p   ’D“” ZL r• x er r– MN—SMN—O7P:N—(KL -. ˜45 ™ š ? Gp  7“G> 3‚› œB  €#% ž 78 7*, x€ z{ #  ŸHl4.m nop>            

(14)    Ÿ ¡ . . .    

(15) . . . . . )*. . .  +$#, .  . . .         ! "#$ % & '() * +, -./ 0 1234 5 647 89 : ;< 09 =>*9 :; ?@AB CD .E FGH IJ 1KAB .LG 09 ! "# $ MN.H 9 OPQRH P% ST./  U>  => '()J VWXYZ [\ '] ^ _`^ '^J ab => '()c<  0 de.E & '() *J +fB gG  8J h P9 i< +j   kl *)VW mnop+\ q.L3Z 0 12 rs 834 Vt PH u  vwv xy  z^ 9 {|}J ~ 3/ < < €< ‚ƒ „ OPQ R4 WgG + QRH 8  => † . . .

(16)   .  . . . . .   . . . . . !. . . ‡jˆcJ ‰ŠA 7|A/ ‹

(17) < 0 & '()J VWXŒG q.LG. . . .  "  #. ". . $ % "  .  . & '.  . ( . = H 09 =>*J Ž P F H '() Vo  A‡ *); ‘; † ’; J “A A”G  X •9 –P 2ˆH 9 —˜™   ! +% +G ! +% H ˜š34 H , %  ™O› 2.Z  - . / %  +% % rœgG$+  ! +% 9 ˜šH ‰z4 ;.E FH 0 9 ž, 4 Ÿk.H ž s‚ 9 >e5 O   9 ¡.E FG ¡N¢9 OP£ < ¤ O 

(18) .E F3Z 9 OPƒ ¡ NAH ¡(% `3'()+ (g ¥¦#9 V o§ ‘¨e34 ©N. FG ªH (2 ( «P ¬­{  9 OPQR§ ® ¯N°+ ,-.L ±²‰z ³ Q‰z9 ’; X¥§ ´< µ¶4· (©£+ £, ™U¸+ ¹X.LG   H «P ¬­ { 9 £; † º£; O Vo X• » ¼§ ¶X.LG + ½¾H  »¼g Vo X •ƒ 34 Vo9 (; † *);J “A H ¿ Vo’;X *(QR9 ;ÀJ ÁÂA‡ ¥ à qg Vo9 Q: † ;2 mnop º  “A”G   "%). . * %  $ . . . . . 0'. * %.  $ . ' ) 1. . 1+ . '). (2 . , .  . ( (.  ((.  .  . . !. +%. . . .   Map showing the regional plate setting and subdivisions of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Open rectangle denotes the sampling site for this study. Abbreviations: BC=British Columbia, CA=California, OR=Oregon, WA=Washington.. .  VoX•H |µÄÅ C“J A‡  /vÆ¿J ¹ÇA”3Z È X¿ A‡ Q‚ ‹TÉ\Êv ¯N¡*¥ ƒ +‰A‡ † . 4!

(19) 35'. , . ! . !. !. !. !. $. 6%. 5 . 7.

(20) . 8%.

(21)       !"   ˆƒ 34 Wz¡^ A”G wË  ©N*)c9 *)e † (e ‘¨J ÁÂA  Ì –Í¡^J ¶XA”G –Í¡^¥H ¥Î+Z ¡^Ï< α Å ƒ +‰A‡ §>WÐ Wƒ 4 A”3Z ,©ÑÒ ©ÓÑÒ P*ÑÒ kµ>‚H 34 › ¡^A”G Ô WÄÅ¡^¥  2Õg Á2¡ ©: ¡*¥ % Ö¡©:¡*¥ ƒ + ‰A‡ _Q`^ _`^34 ;.E FH ` '() '^ ']^9 ;J ¡^A”G ¡^   Cross-sectional view of the studied chimney recovered Ï9 §>WÐ † WH × from the Cleft segment within Juan de Fuca Ridge. Scale ¥H µ 8 ˆ  ØNXŸ< Ù ¡^ bar is 5 cm. •  ÚÛÜÝH +A+G Ô ©N *)c9 ޒCU% Åßà † ©NH kµW Vo9 ð™/J ñòq/ óš< OP§ + ÄÅ J +‰A‡ ^A”G  +‰ I34 ô.H õö GÞÀ5 ¡34 +fE÷ g Ì –Í¡^¥ < #á FH |/ øùš< ºe &34 +fE÷ Fú  Wâ*)ã·  ˆ2g I J û P FG Ì –Í ¡^‹ Vo9 k ;* +G )< ']^ `'() _`^ _Q`^ ¸+ ¿ ª Vo ’;X9 *(QR9 ;À * 15.LG Wz¡^ ‹  9A/ Vo9 óš ˆH  ’; ÏJ äåA¥ A‡ QRaQ) ƒ øùš34 §/ ˆ ¶XA”G QRaQ) H Voƒ ;A FH b®+ ü§AH |/ |µÄÅ C“ ‹. *) r ºÀ ^æ 9 QRaQ)J 34 ¶X H b®+ ýˆA”G A”G ºÀ ^ær C“.H QRaQ)<  Vo9 óšH k4 &34 ©NAH ` '( ¡+ ç ¥9  aQ)+Z :H ¡ ) '^+ ©N.H |/ Vo9 øùš :+ èé3Z ×¥H ¡ µ ‚” H k4 À; ']^+ ©NgG Ô G QRaQ)9 êÈ( ‚H 889 aQ)  |µÄÅ J +‰A‡ 8 *)Îc9 e J C – +9 |ë ìJ A‡ êí34 ¼î3 “ ‹  9A/ '^< Vo9 §2 óš Z ïÄ ÜÝH + ”G ` '() ޒCUƒ +fZ ˆ® ¡aA FG ` '() ªX Vo9 óš §2 è+ ¡aA F øùš34 þPÿ ýˆAH J q5G   . ¯:9 |: ']^< W|e34 Vo9 rŸ  è+ ¡aA F3Z À; ']^< Vo9 ø     9  »¼ ùš34 þPÿ e34  ü§AH J q‡k 

(22)  . . .     . % )  . . . 93. . '!47!. - 2. . + . . -. 5. . . .  =2. '' . . . -. . '9. +;%.  *>? '. 

(23) 65. @<'. . <'. . . . . !:. /;. <'  . '. . *953(2. 65!. !. /;. %5. .  A B.  . . . . . $+ . '6. . 4!

(24) 35' 93.  

(25) 65. '6. . !6.  9. . . . . . . . ,  . . ! . 5 . !. !. $. !. 6%. !.

(26) . 7. 8%. C  . . . 3. . . $+ 5. =. . $+ ,. . . . . . B. . 3. . 3. . . . . * %. . $ . +. !. +%. 

(27)  Bulk chemical composition of inferred growth zones within the chimney from the Cleft segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge Zone. Dominant mineralogy. inner Cpy, Wtz, Py intermediate Sp, Py, Mc, Si outer Py, Mc, Fe-oxide, Si Average. ppm As. Ba. 279 233 295 269. 10.4 593 91.9 7.8 380 104.4 21.6 1042 32.9 13.2 671 76.4. Ca. Cd. Co. Cr. Mn. Ni. Pb. Zn. 6.8 2.3 3.0 4.1. 9.7 1,804 224,665 698 5.4 1,658 241,401 756 10.4 923 326,284 728 8.5 1,462 264,117 727. Cu. Fe. 10.6 9.4 9.2 9.7. 1,181 1,492 1,631 1,435. 73,349 96,879 48,557 72,928. Abbreviations: Cpy=chalcopyrite, Wtz=wurzite, Py=pyrite, Sp=sphalerite, Mc=marcasite, Si=silica..

(28) .  

(29) .   Scanning electron microscope images of the studied chimney. (A) Amorphous silica with spheroidal form. (B) Amorphous silica coated around sulfides.   Photomicrographs of polished sections of the studied chimney. (A) Amorphous silica infilling the interstices between Zn-sulfides and chalcopyrite. Scale bar is 100 µm. (B) Colloform pyrite occurring in exterior part of the chimney. Scale bar is 200 µm..  FG ]^< Vo9 ª ˆ® ¡aA F3Z ºÀ ¶ËnH Vo óš9 h4ƒ &3 4 ëA F3Z W|e34 êÀAB ¡aA F G kµWÄÅ C“ ‹. ºÀ ¶ËnH :9 :ƒ q‡k F3Z k4 Q(*)9 kŽ ëg »4 ¡aA F G _`^ † _Q`^34 ;g ` '()J 34 WÄÅ¡^ ‹. `  '()9 ]b® < 9  ê ¡^P ƒ q‡kLG Ô ` '() 9 rs ¡H Ž º e34 ]+ (.E FG +H OP9 )Ë (e ‘;+ *) VW  E Ý Ž(A”úJ X G . . $+ -. $+ . $+ 5 %. ,. $+ ,. 3. C  . 3. B $'. . B&. . 2. =-B. . $+ 2. 3. . . .    Vo9 óš QR h4 &34 ©N .H ºÀ ¶Ën H : aQ)

(30) + C“gG $+  4: aQ)< ç ¥9 34 ;. E F3Z §O¶ X ç34 êÈ( gG aQ) ú9 Ù¥ ‰‚H 3  =3 !9 . 4.   Variation of the abundance of major minerals within the studied chimney.. . .

(31) 

(32)  . 

(33) . .     .       !" . . Chemical composition of zinc sulfides in the chimney from the Cleft segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge. Weight Percent. Sample no.. Zn. Fe. Mn. Cd. Cu. S. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 54.0 52.2 53.9 53.9 59.0 56.5 48.1 48.3. 11.8 14.7 13.3 13.0 8.2 9.8 18.0 18.1. 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1. 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0. 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0. 33.4 33.5 33.2 33.8 33.8 33.2 34.4 33.6. 2 2 2 2 2. 51.5 49.2 46.8 51.1 49.6. 14.2 15.6 18.1 16.2 15.8. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0. 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.1 1.0. 3 3 3 3 3 3 3. 50.8 54.7 55.2 48.8 47.7 47.6 47.1. 14.0 12.3 10.7 17.8 19.0 18.8 19.4. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0. 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2. 7 7 7 7 7 7. 55.3 54.6 57.3 45.8 45.6 47.7. 9.3 12.9 9.1 20.6 20.1 19.2. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1. 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1. Mole percent. Total. ZnS. FeS. MnS. CdS. CuS. Remarks. 100.1 101.1 100.9 101.1 101.2 100.0 101.0 100.1. 78.6 74.6 77.1 77.6 85.8 82.5 69.1 69.4. 20.2 24.6 22.3 22.0 13.9 16.8 30.3 30.4. 1.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2. 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0. 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1. Rim Rim Rim Rim Rim Rim Core Core. 33.6 33.7 33.9 34.0 33.8. 99.5 99.5 99.4 101.7 100.4. 75.3 71.9 68.2 72.6 71.5. 24.3 26.7 30.8 27.0 26.7. 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0. 0.1 1.3 0.8 0.1 1.5. Rim Core Core Core Core. 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0. 33.4 34.0 33.4 34.0 34.0 34.2 34.4. 98.7 101.3 99.7 100.9 100.7 101.0 101.1. 75.0 78.8 81.2 69.9 68.1 68.0 67.3. 24.2 20.8 18.5 29.8 31.8 31.4 32.5. 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0. 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2. 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1. Rim Rim Rim Core Core Core Core. 1.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.4. 33.0 33.5 33.3 34.3 34.6 34.4. 99.0 101.4 100.0 101.1 101.4 101.9. 81.8 78.1 84.1 65.2 64.8 67.4. 16.1 21.6 15.6 34.3 33.5 31.8. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2. 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1. 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.5 0.5. Rim Rim Rim Core Core Core. ¿ ç ÔH §" P()+ C“. H I34 q` !> b®< +A¸J ô P FG §O¶  9 êÈ( ‚ H +Z 8¶  9 ‚ H =-( A B 7 !+GC   '() VoX•ƒ »¼ ª9 Ps< ‚4  9 PÐ ")  .  Ï gG

(34)   9 • 9A/   U QRaQ)9 êÈ(‚  Ðq .   %< —   Å

(35) +G [\   ª QRaQ)9 ¶¹ a  %+ ‚ H Ð qJ ýó G A\‚ 2 Å

(36) +L3 Ë\ ³™gG (. . !>. . (.  . #%D % #%) (. . . =- !. . -. =2. .   Histogram of FeS contents (mole %) of Zincsulfides from the studied chimney.. . . . .  . #>37 !=.  . A B. . !. . . ƒ q+ C“A¥§ õö E  ²

(37) + ì.LG +j ‰‚H aQ)  ‰ Ã.E FH cr § +9 ï% 7 !+  Me¸J XA FG. . !. . C  . , %. &. ! A. .

(38).  –Pg '() VoH W:e3. ! +%.

(39)  

(40)   '() ‹9 Žƒ A¥‚ G Vo Þ< ºÀ ¶Ën9 À;! 9 ë.E F G VoH WRe34 ]^ ']^ `'( ) ºÀ ¶Ën9 0; *)TJ q‡k FG *)9 ‚ƒ ºA‡ q/ ']^"] ^"ºÀ ¶Ën `'() _`^#_Q` ^ '^ i+G ` '() _Q`^ † _ `^ 9 b®< 9 ƒ q5G QRaQ) ¶ ‹  9A/ Voƒ ; A FH kg *)c< - =- !9 ºe < ‚% P9 ‚% Re34 ÈAH =-( A B 7 !9 < ‚ƒ „ QR4· VW. LúJ XA FG ¥Ã ‹  9A/. . 3. . . E. E. E . . F. F. . . . 3. $'. . =-. B. . . . . . # )%. . (&.  . C).  &. (&. : . . , .  . -. 0 ©N.H VoH ×B ² Q:34 ¡g G $ % Q:< '() &' (ƒ +f / Á+) #9 ˧  Vo§

(41) cEH QR9 +, CU§ F ö4 ; * G á% Q:< - #9 Vo4 1©AH  ;* QR9 +, CU§ FG OPQR % P9 ./ S< ^§  8À!J

(42) 0G ߍ% Q:< ºe 02 9 QR§ A Ä1z!34· à@ MN.H 2 ` ' ()+  Vo§ 3< h4ƒ „ k34

(43) cEH ö+G 4% Q:< W (; * *)T ']^#]^#` '()#ºÀ ¶Ën † À; àJ 5H I 3 1©>‚§ 67 QR9 +, W‚; 8+ öß 0;G !¥9 Vo+G + H  Vo9 (‚ ‚ƒ -. . . . . (. !. . .   Photomicrographs of fluid inclusions in amorphous silica of the studied chimney.. !. . . !. 3. 4 &9 á7 J § F3 Þ < €< ¿+G Vo  ©N.H Úe5 Q(*)<  À;  |:9 ']^ † ]^+Z _Q` ^ _`^34 ;g À :9 ` '() < QR h4 kŽH AB ©N. 3

(44) e34  .E F¥‚ AG ˆ®9 '^< ` . . 3. . . . B ! GB

(45) . . . . . 

(46)  Microthermometric data of fluid inclusions in amorphous silica from the chimney of Cleft segment. Size (µm). Sample no.. Th-tot (oC). Tm-ice (oC). Salinity (wt.%NaCl equiv.). X-axis. Y-axis. Vapor ratio (%). Tm-initial (oC). 1 1 1 2 2 7 7 7. 114 114 145 121 123 127 133 123. -2.7 -1.9 -2.9 -1.9 -2.2 -2.0 -2.0 -2.6. 4.5 3.9 4.8 3.2 4.5 4.2 4.2 4.3. 15 15 51 12 24 24 27 24. 6 9 20 12 12 18 20 18. 17 19 40 19 25 15 20 40. -20.7 -21.4 -20.9 -21.5 -21.3. Abbreviations: Th-tot=total homogenization temperature, Tm-ice=final ice melting temperature, Tm-initial=initial ice melting temperature..

(47) 

(48)  . 

(49) . .     .       !" . . Comparison of the characteristics of four types of chimney (modified after Koski et al., 1994). Type I. Type II. Type III. Form. columnar-cylindrical bulbous sulfide mound or Substrate sulfide mound chimney 293-312 Temperature, oC 310-328 diffuse, slower Fluid flow focused, rapid than type I chalcopyrite, Abundant anhydrite anhydrite, sphalerite Common. pyrite, wurtzite. Minor. bornite, marcasite, covellite, amorphous wurtzite, silica, Fe-Mg chalcopyrite silicates, barite. Trace. apatite, galena. pyrrhotite. G B. . E. E. E. . . . . . . .     . !. . G. . . % . %. basalt. basalt. basalt. 261. <250. 114-145. focused, slow. diffuse, slow. ?. pyrite, marcasite, amorphous silica sphalerite, wurtzite. pyrite, marcasite, amorphous silica sphalerite, wurtzite. 9 '()+ J0 VW. OP MN®+ ýˆ A P9 ST®+ $/ ºÀ ¶Ënƒ ab 09 *)c+ VW.H I34 µ•gG ºÀ ¶ËnH Å

(50) 9 ‚ OPQR% P9 ST H VW. ¥ ;¾ ª9 Vo ºÀ ¶ Ën§ AGH I< W‚; OW‚ 9  *( ¢¥ K  ݧ7 QR§ Q.LGH IJ X A FG +j 8¥Ç< LM.E FH Vo h 4  QR§ 6ËB Q ; qG H e+ LF I34 µ•gG  5   –Pg VoX•9 |µÄÅ Ì –Í¡^ W ÄÅ¡^ kµWÄÅ QRaQ) ¶ ‹ % ¥Ã9 ‹. ƒ ºA‡ q/  VoH ¥Ã ‹ 9 ¹ Q: Q µ ‘;J q+H I34 ôgG wjN 4  VoH 1©;9 67 QRQ W‚; 8  9 ’;.L3Ë\ µ•gG . $+ -. . >" . . . . . !. . !. * % ). % '). (-. . . * %  $ . ! +%.  9. . C).  . . . # )%.  &. : . (&.  . , .  . (&. -. -. . C  -. . G. B C  . . :I. pinnacle. marcasite,pyrite, wurtzite isocubanite/ chalcopyrite, anglesite, barite pyrrhotite, anhydrite, chalcopyrite chalcopyrite, galena barite, amorphous silica galena, covellite -. à@ ìAH 8î

(51) Vo9 W(; *)T ']^ ]^ `'() ºÀ ¶Ën À; à9 b 934 : ; G< Vo Q: º 9 VoH = < VWÏ ’;.LúJ û P FG Vo C“‹. ^9 VW< 15. éG Vo ^ § 15. éGH I< *)VW9 ¢¥™U  ’;.LJ I34 ô.H ^§ 0; OP QR † P >e34 >N./ ?W@ ‰ g ;¾5 I34 µ•gG ©N*)9 e b®J C “ q/ ²âe34 á ²9 *(X¥ƒ ô : P FGH  _Q`^ † _`^34 ;g ` 3'() † ˆ®9 '^ VW+ öß *(X¥&  ºÀ ¶Ën9 VW+ öß *(X¥$+ - À; † 9 ßÀ ']^ † ]^34 ;g ABC #9 Vo H Pè< D‡E QRh44 ;.E FG +H *)VW Ù¥ u => 34 a(.LF QR4· º e 6ËB VWg  J zX G !  % , % 29 '^ ‰ ‚ •%  Vo 9 õö < b® ê 34 : ;  Q:9 Voƒ ’; QR‚H   ƒ G éJ I34 ôgG È|e34 OP‰ç3 4· _Q`^9 VW< H  9à G  q.E FG [\   Vo _Q`^< GÞ; VoJ h  Vt P% 6ËB Ià+H OPQR§ |}A / VW.LJ I34 µ•gG W|e34 Vo . ! B

(52) . This study. pinnacle. sphalerite. sphalerite, pyrite. . Type IV. columnar-spindle. . . !. .  .  * %  $   »¼ g VoH k4 ºÀ ¶Ën ']^ _`^ _ Q`^34 ;.E F3Z '^ ]^< ˆ ® ¡abJ û P FG _`^ † _Q`^34 ;g `3'()9 $' b®< =- B !. +%. . . . .

(53)  

(54)  ê ¡^P 9 ƒ q+Z ]+  rs% ]+ B Ž ‘;J q ‡k FG  Voƒ ;A FH ºÀ ¶Ënƒ 34 QRaQ) ¶ ‹ Voƒ ;A F H kg *)c< =- !9 ºe < ‚% =-( A B 7 !9 < ‚ƒ „ QR4 · ’;.LJ I34 ^gG ©N: À; à W (; *) T ']^#]^#_Q`^#ºÀ ¶Ën 9J A ¥Ã Vo Q: ºîJ ;  V oH @ < ‚ 1©;9 67 QR Q. W‚; 8  9  ’;.LJ I34 ôgG  . . B. 2. . .  )* ( : 6 4#5,,.   ;3   -  <7 4: = 

(55) 5  > )    6        

(56) )   

(57)    $#, . . #,  .  

(58)  1  ( 4 6 44$54!. .       !   4 0(  65 . . . 6    6  (     . 9 . . -. 2  &  ( $44 6 #$5#$%. <

(59)   20 % 1   

(60)  ) * 

(61) *  

(62)  &  ( , 6 :#5:%. <  '  8   <   28 %# / 

(63) 65. . . . . .   =     6 

(64) 

(65)      ? .( 

(66)  (   

(67)   . . . . 

(68) 6    6 

(69)    6  .  

(70) . 1  ( %, 6 4,5!,:. .  * ;2       8. %! 

(71)  . G. .

(72) (   6      ? @ 

(73) . !.   .

(74)   

(75) A  )  .  

(76)         1  

(77)   . . 

(78)  

(79)   3  ( !% 6 $4$5$4%.

(80)

(81). BC

(82)     =

(83)  <  < 

(84)   5         6    /D#, $#, . + H  Wâ*)ã· 9 ïe 34 PO.L3Z ßs sµ%  PJ kK ©  Q PR

(85) À  ¾{ ƵRB ýµƒ SoG. B* 23    @2 B* ; 

(86)   >B  . 0   1  ( ! 6 5$4. !6. . .  -*  ./ 0  1     23 %4 5  

(87)  (         2  &  ( $ 6 !5#. 8  7 ! 

(88) 6  

(89)  

(90) .   

(91) 6      

(92)   55  5  

(93)         

(94)      2     1 6   2    (  6 !%5!%$ 9  28 @@@ 44 9         

(95)   

(96) 6   )    (

(97) . 66  . .  . 

(98). &5<=. E     1   (    2    ( # 6 :,5:,4 6  &   %, . 9  2 ? < 6     6   A6 

(99)     ( $,4 6 !$5! /(  0B =  >8 0  >8   7  2;. -*  ./ 7(   23   23 0  1  . , /

(100) 6 

(101) 

(102)     . 8*  7 % .6 (     

(103) .      ) * 

(104) *  

(105)  &  ( !:.  

(106)      2     1 5 6   2    ( ! 6 $45$#,. 6 #5#! E 1   ( E1      16. - * 3 44     

(107) 6 . %: )

(108)   6     

(109) .    5'    

(110)   )  . (          2 ? 9 

(111) 5. 

(112) 

(113)   (  1    1 6  .   ) (  

(114)  )

(115) ) 3(  1 5. ( % 6 5.  ( ! 6 %$5%$4.  07 % 9  ')  '      0   3      . ¢ £ ¤ ¥¦. $,,$. . #. ¢ £ ¤ §E¨k.  $,,$. :. !. .

(116)

참조

관련 문서

A jet pump is a fluid carrying device which spouts fluid of high pressure from a driving engine pipe and absorbs fluid of high pressure whose pressure

As a result, exhibition booth development was carried out the basis of the study results. On that account, the result of the exhibition booth

In this study, two experiments were conducted to understand the effects of additional charge on the detailed growth mechanism of Alq 3 and to determine the effect of

• Under the assumption of equilibrium conditions, and knowing the composition of the fluid stream coming into the separator and the working pressure and temperature

• Mechanism of boundary layer growth on a smooth flat plate - Boundary layer flow: laminar → transition → turbulent - Velocity of the fluid particle at the body wall is

n The magnitude of the buoyant force acting on a floating body in the fluid is equal to the weight of the fluid which is displaced by

✓ The rate of change of energy is equal to the sum of the rate of heat addition to and the rate of work done on a fluid particle.. ▪ First

 The rate of change of energy is equal to the sum of the rate of heat addition to and the rate of work done on a fluid particle..  First