• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Verbal Interaction in Paired Think-Aloud Problem Solving

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Verbal Interaction in Paired Think-Aloud Problem Solving"

Copied!
11
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5 Printed in the Republic of Korea.  

(2)  :      * †  .   (2002. 5. 9

(3) ). †. Verbal Interaction in Paired Think-Aloud Problem Solving: Comparison of the Characteristics of Small Groups Based on Achievement Taehee Noh*, Hunsik Kang, and Kyungmoon Jeon† Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-748, Korea † Department of Science Education, Gwangju National University of Education, Gwangju 500-703, Korea (Received May 9, 2002). . .     

(4)  . !" #$%&' ()* +,-.' /. 0 123. 4 #56 78 29 :0 ;<2! =* #$%'   $%  =* #$%'   $%>? @A6 B, 

(5) C0 D423.  E FG =* #$%(++, EE) =* #$%(+E, +2)0 ;<2!  HIJ KL M6 <N* OP  <0 Q /QR23. =* #$% STU ++ 1' VW  ‘' X’0,  ‘'’Y Z [\]^.  _ EE 1 =* #$%` +E, +2 1a b2c ' ‘d*’[ ' ‘

(6) <’ Z [\e. ()* +,-.f H*>? gh ZiU, j Ek ++ #$% ‘' X-'’S Z  [\e.  kh +,-.>? ++ #$% ‘l-'’,  kh +,-.>? +2 #$% ‘d*-

(7) <’ Sm Z [\e. OP  %n ‘l’ %n' okS pc [\e7 ‘qr’ % na Mst ()* uf v' [\[d wi.. :  ,

(8) , ,    ABSTRACT. This study investigated the characteristics of verbal interactions of various small groups based on previous achievement in paired think-aloud problem solving. Two classes of a high school were assigned to the homogeneous and heterogeneous groups, and taught on chemistry. Students from homogeneous groups (high·high, mid·mid) and heterogeneous groups (high·mid, high·low) were selected, and their algorithmic problem solving on chemical equation and stoichiometry were audio/video taped. In high·high group, solver’s ‘require agreement’ and listener’s ‘agree’ were frequently exhibited. On the other hands, listener’s ‘point out’ and solver’s ‘modify’ were frequently exhibited in mid·mid group, which was also observed in the heterogeneous groups (high·mid, high·low). Many verbal interactions were analyzed to be in symmetrical type. In this type, ‘require agreement-agree’ of high·high group was the most frequent. ‘Problem solving-agree’ of high·high group was the most frequent in the solver-dominant type, while ‘point out-modify’ of high·low group in the listener-dominant type. The verbal behaviors related to the solving stage were frequently observed, but there were few related to the reviewing stage. Keywords: Paired Think-Aloud Problem Solving, Verbal Behavior, Verbal Interaction, Problem Solving Stages.  519.

(9) . 520.

(10). :2 m 0 C–9 ¥¦ h ,† >h ,†9:. 

(11)  .    . C y —>Q §2 ] ˜m). 1.14  0 N0 .‡ CQ _ ¨© kª. ! "#$ %& '() *+,. > «¬6I, 1¦ ,†  >$ Q A.  ,-./ -0$12 STS 34/ "#562. v­/ Q®0> \1. Ž G , >h ,† X9. 7.  . ! 89:; <= "#$ >1. ?@A B. :; ¯ 0 C– F> .e, .e9.   CD/ E FG   <=. ¥°  - > ±°h C \1. ¥°: . HI FG  / 5JK L$ 1.  9: m 0 C–9  h ,†. -$ MNG> O

(12) ) *1. ? "9: WhimbeyP. >A >h ,†/ N0²/ ‚, ? N0‡ 0. Lochhead Q R$  (paired think-. C–> ³´ )2e, ¨© µ¶>2e ’9 ¥°. aloud problem solving) FG>   ST/. N·  ¸¹ ‹#Q \1.. 1. 2. UU VWX2Y ;Z/ [ C \2 ] .^)_. >9 „ MN9:2  9: m. \1.  9: 2  . 0 C–> 1¦ w@ ,†G .  `/ FaA2 b c6_, 2 . 0/ ˜m6¢1. „ MN N· . %&2 1º.   `/ d_ >Q )e f2 g= h6.  ~1.. _ ij/ e $1. > /  FG kl m_ Kn/ opqr  > s t C \ +,2,3   `9: uv.e Kn/ mq r w@ Qe x` . yQ Avz1_ {_| } \1.4-6. 1) h ,† >h ,† P  

(13) / kl$1. 2) »;Q ¼

(14) / "½     kl$1. 3) P  m> / ¾´. >P ~   x` . y _€  ‚, ? X `/ kl {Wƒ $1. >  K„ Q    `/ c.  (;¿,  (;¿, bÀ¿ Nk6w, ,†' 0/ ™ $1.  . Á  w@ ›œ9. &76_ Q > d2 ]>e ? `9: . : FG9´ x`  62 ] {_)_. P  m> > Avz1. ,. \1. Pestel15 bF(N=45)/ b  $  Ã. †  y2 N0‡G

(15)  ˆ‰$. 9:  /. 3Š> \I,7,8  9: . Æ † FG   / ? >  . / kl  ‹#Q \1. ,† .  † FG(N=57) P ™ 6¢2Y, ÅÆ †. C yA  N0. ‡G Œ. . 0, Ž G 0, M,. C6¢1. ?Ä_ Å. 9 b. $ ;, m‘0, 0; ’ “s/ E/ C \1. ”. 9: 04/ E F> _ žk 4C E  F> šÇ1_ {_6¢1. Dorman3 11È 12È FG/ b  3È. • m 0 C–9 $ h ,† >h. R Á /. ,† —> ˜m62 MNG> ™ š> O

(16). FG>  † FG{1 D 0 Ém, k. C$ , ÅÆ †. ) *1. ?  m 0 C–9 $ >h . ,. l   Ém, ÊÄ ËÄ ® Ém9: . † 4> w@ Qe ›œ9: {_)1.9,10 ?@. † FG{1 ¡ 4C EÇ+, 9 b$. A ”ž MNG "L C– FG> h †9:. FG ;; x` . ] {_6¢1.. Ÿw > ¡We_ 0;Q s )2 ] {_6. Glass4 7È9: 12È F 66«/ b . 6L C– FG g=9; `:  R`. ™N˜Â| Kn  m6w  &  uv. ¢1.. 7,11. £/ [ C \2 h ,†9:   `/. .e / Ø$ Á /. UU Fa6_ {1 ¤  Ÿw$12 MN . ¢1. ?Ä_   ÌÍ6e2 fÇA, ÅÆ. Q {_)1.12,13. † FG>  † FG{1 uv.e.  9: ,† N0 S^9 b. C6. . m_ Kn/ Î š> m6¢+, {1  es Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(17)

(18)    :  . >_ 9 i †"62 ] Av­1_ {_6¢1.. !"# $ %&. 521. `{ Ù6e fÇ1.  9 b$. C yP . âÄãä>å æ çŠ/, b ‡ µ3$ X. m 0 C–9 ¥¦ ,† N0 ST9 “s/ E. 4—59 èé O

(19) 6¢1. „ —52 ÂÖê^ Â. $Ï, ,† . 2 ] {.1. OkebukolaP Ogunniyi 2 Ðo. -ë9 b 8—5 O

(20) 6¢1.  .  gÑo, ŒÒo N˜9: m 0 C–( , ",. / ì æ ìº6K L, < CD 5' >9 ™. 6)9 ¥¦ ,† N0 ST y  0; ›. íâ îu°P ìºK ØÆ6¢1. FG> ïð. œ9: ˜m6¢1. ?Ä_ L C– FG Ð. h C \;ñ, âÄãä>å æ çŠ K' R òó ,. 10. o †9: 0; 4CQ Q ¡Ç_, 6L C– . †> ìÂ/ìº `/ $ ô > gõ6;ñ 6¢. FG gÑo †9: 0; 4CQ Q HÇ. 1. „ MN ö 9:2 òó Ì¿ ,†/. +, "L C– FG Ðo N˜A gÑo N. : ™ 6_ 6¢A, MN O

(21) `9: 0 >. ˜ m>9 ¼ —>Q §1_ {_6¢1. >@$ . ÷˜$ "6, 66 ˜ FG   9. 2 L C– FG g=92 C–> ™Ó$ F. Ÿw6e f2 gs> \I, >G/ ø$ Aù. GÔÄ qÕ o62 ]> >h . †9: o6. e 4Œ ,† / ˜m62 ]. 2 ]{1 0;9 y . ֜, 6L C– FG. MN % / úg6¢1. ¥°: „ —5 QûY `ü.  >h  N0| ,†9: Ðo/ .  62 5—59 b, h †9: 2Œ. 0;Q {1 s t C \º/ Í$1. Webb11 ". C CD9: m 0 C–> . h . ,† >h . ,†/ N06w Ð. ,†(  , ""), >h †9: 2Œ ,†(  ", 6), ý 8«/ á`6w ìÂ/ìº6¢1.  . <5'. m2 X Ø« >× Ž5 . o/ $ ×,

(22) / kl6¢1. ?Ä_ >.   (_, > : FG e9 ( O. h †9: L C– FG 6L C– FG{1.    6¢1. ( O . Ø«/ Ù62

(23) / ÌÍ6´ š> AvÚ1_. 2. :  Ì¿ Ìm6¢+, ? Ž Table. 6¢1. Û$, "L C– FG >h †{1 h. 19 56¢1. 2    `/ ò. †9: Ø«/ ÙE2

(24) / Î š> AvÚ_,. ß ,ÄX c6;ñ 6¢_, 2 Q þ. > . 0; 4CQ >h †{1 h †9:. c/ 6;ñ Ì;6_    `> >. ÌÍ6´ ¡Ç1_ {_6¢1.. Q )e f/ g= h6+ ij/ e 6;ñ 6¢1. òó CD9: a ˜ N0‡ ”6¢+, < —.    . 5 FG> ¨©/. b6;ñ 6¢_,. e;6¢1. CD e žk9:   . „ MN2 :Ü59 ,Ý$ w. m2 ÿ‘. m2 CD X.    `/ `Ä (1.. _’   2È/ b  6¢1. "' _m.   . ìÂ/ìº ä>P FG R.  0 / K– FG/ "6L C–. e Ÿ˜6w (protocol)/ 06¢1. ÷.  kÞ6_, 0 > ™Ó$ ß à/ á`$ × . P 

(25)  á

(26) MN16 kl.  / L$ h ,†(  , "", 6. / ú¿6w ý 17Œ ( kl6¢1. . 6) >h ,†( ", 6, "6)/ Ï06.

(27)  " ‘ #’   `9. ¢1. > ‚,. b$  > wžA  wž ¬.62 ]>. mA FG9´2 ˜ N0 ST9 b$. Table 1. Examples of problems given to the students Example 1. Methane (CH4) reacts with oxygen (O2) to produce water and carbon dioxide. CH4 (g) + 2O2 (g) → 2H2O (l) + CO2 (g) What mass of O2 are required to react completely with 160 g of CH4?. Calcium carbide (CaC2) reacts with water to produce acetylene (C2H2) according to the equation Example 2. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5. CaC2 (s) + 2H2O (l) → Ca(OH)2 (s) + C2H2 (g) How many grams of CaC2 are required to produce 44.8 L (at 0 oC and 1.00 atm) of C2H2 by this reaction?.

(28) . 522. 1. ‘Ù’  h, e ’9 b 62. Table 2. Mean time used in paired think-aloud problem solving. ]>_, ‘C`’   / C6w  . Group. `/ C`62 ]>1. 

(29)  " ‘e. Solver. Ha Hb Ma Mb Hc Mc Hd. ’ ij| žk/ e (2 ]>_, ‘C’ . Mean time (min). 8.0 4.8 7.8 6.4 4.9 6.0. HaHb. MaMb. HcMc. HdL. 9.9. L 13.0. > h6 A e ²

(30) m 9 b$   / EWG>2 ]>1. ?9 ‘`Â’2 Öb  9 ž. _ kl' ”Æ;(intercoder agreement) N6¢1. / ‚   S 62 ]>1. MN %. (

(31)  .93,    .99, . FG ™

(32) ,. .99). > × òó / MN 1.> kl6¢1.. mP F m> .  ’ kl9: ø6¢1.. Û$, B  9 ©$ 5'/ _. »;Q Q ¼

(33) / "½  . €6K L6w < —5   ,# 5'/ ›`6. `/ >-ö->-É 17 kl6¢1. >. ¢1.  ,# 5'> Table 2P ~ÇI, K– 5. 2 ( O ˜>A Nƒ © ]/ 62 `. ' 10k »; 6¢1.. >_, ö 2 P 3Š| Œ>A T/ ‘.   . 6 A 6L %& Ø`62 `>1. > 2 N· . C^ C>A >9 b$ CÄ C

(34) / Í 6+, É 2 N$  Nƒ © ] ™ ,  ` æ L É Í$1.. .  ! "  #$.

(35).   »; a ,†9 þ62 Ò ˜m. e

(36) 9 K6w P . 6¢1(Table 3). ‘ #’ òó ,†9: b·.  m> / <žñ 1> kl k.  š> Av­_ ‘C`’ Á (HaHb) ˜ ø$. l6¢1.  (;¿ Ž2 Q UU . Aùe 3Œ ,†9: ™ š> Av­1. Á6.  6_(>) Q 1º ~> ÿ ‘. (HdL) ˜9:2 ‘’, ‘Ö’, ‘`Â’ ’; C. ’6 A  c/ ‘Ö’6w c62 . 3 )1.. / G C \1.  

(37)            !"# $. h ,† QûY Á (HaHb) ˜ g= !Q  ¨©/ 6¯"9 3§> ‘ #’> Q š> Av­_(Ha 3.8, Hb 9.4), Hb2 Ha h9 Ø «/ ‘Ù(3.1)’62

(38) ; ™ š> AvÚ1. >. Öb,  (;¿ Ž2 Q . 2 Q ¼ €Z §>   Qœ: ;. ij/ ‘e ’²/ ‚ Q >9 ‘’ 6 A . "9 # > wžA  wž / ¬.6¢K ‚.   `/ ‘C`’62 / G C \1.. . ] {.1. ‘ #’9 b   . !%&  '( ) *+ ,-  ./0   1 220345. bÀ¿ P Q ’6´    `9 Ÿw62 Ì¿, Q ‘ #’²/ ‚. Ò »; ˜m$ 9:2, HbQ ‘>’ 9 b$  #/ š> AvX$ 6¢A(4.2), HaP Hb òß ‘>’A ‘ö’ 9 b$  #; 1.33.1‘ `; {¢1.. Q >9 ‘’62 g=, Q ij/ ‘e. "Á"(MaMb) ˜9:2 ‘ #’; šÇA(Ma. ’²/ ‚ Q   / S (`Â)62 g. 2.1, Mb 2.3), Mb g= Ma ;Z/ EW  . =, Û 1º ~> Q ‘h’²/ ‚ Q. `/ ‘C`(5.5)’6 A Ma  / b >6. Ø«/ ‘Ù’62 g=9 $1.. e j6w ‘Ö(4.7)’62 g=Q šÇ1.   . !

(39)  6 7+. Ò »; ˜m$ 9: Ma2 ‘>(.4)’, ‘ö.  8 6 96: ;  < 000=: >. (1.3)’, ‘É(.4)’ 9 b ‘ #’

(40) / {¢.  ? @A @A B0C2D9CE 96A -. A, Mb2 > (2.3)9 b: ‘ #’6. #F5 G/0. ¢1. %, ”$ "L C– F>° ©e°; Mb2.  kl9:2 MN 2.> kl/ Mo6.  9: b  €Z/ ¯Ô+, Ma2  Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(41)

(42)    :  . !"# $ %&. 523. Table 3. Mean frequency of solver’s verbal behaviors1 Homogeneous HaHb. Ask Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Reqire agreement Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Agree Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Disagree Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Provide Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Justify Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Ask in Return Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Correct Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Modify Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing 1. corrected for 10 minutes.. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5. Heterogeneous MaMb. HcMc. HdL. Ha. Hb. Ma. Mb. Hc. Mc. Hd. L. 3.8 1.7 1.3 .8 1.7 .4 .8 .4 .8 .4 .4 1.3 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 -. 1.0 1.0 9.4 3.1 2.1 4.2 1.0 1.0 3.1 2.1 1.0 -. 2.1 .4 1.3 .4 1.3 .9 .4 .9 .9 .4 .4 -. 1.6 .8 .8 2.3 2.3 1.6 1.6 1.6 .8 .8 .8 .8 4.7 1.6 .8 .8 1.6 .8 .8 5.5 .8 4.7 -. 5.4 1.4 4.1 .7 .7 1.4 1.4 2.0 1.4 .7 1.4 1.4 -. 1.7 .8 .8 1.7 .8 .8 1.7 1.7 2.5 1.7 .8 1.7 .8 .8 .8 .8 10.0 .8 1.7 7.5 -. 3.7 1.0 1.7 1.0 5.7 1.3 1.3 3.0 3.0 .7 .7 1.7 .3 .3 2.0 .3 1.3 .3 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.7 .7 .7 2.0 .3 4.0 2.0 2.0 -. 2.3 1.2 1.2 1.9 .8 1.2 6.9 1.2 1.2 4.6 1.2 1.2 2.3 .8 1.2 .4 1.5 1.5 5.0 .8 1.5 2.7 .4 .4 5.0 .4 .8 3.8 -.

(43) . 524.   `9: {1 "#$ G/ _€6_ Mb  &2 ¨©/ C

(44) 62 ] Av­1.. 9: ,_- Av­1. Á (HaHb) ˜ g= Q !N.Q9 3. >h ,†. Á"(HcMc) ˜9:2 HcQ . §>    `9 ÿ ‘’62

(45). ” ‚92 ‘ #(5.4)’> Q š> Av­_,. > Q š> Av­1.  ‘’P  . McQ ” ‚92 ‘C`(10.0)’> Q š> Av.  s m>92 3Q §2 ] ˜m| } \1.16. ­1. Hc ‘ #’ Mc ‘C`’9 b  . ‘’9 b   Ò »; ˜m$ 9.  Ò »; kl$ , ‘>’A ‘ö’ 9. :2, HbQ ‘>’ 9 b$ ‘(5.0)’ š> A. 62

(46) ; \A bžk> ‘>’ . v. ֜, Ha2 ‘>’ P ‘ö’ 9 ‘'(. 9 62 ] 3 )1(Hc: > 1.4, ö .0.  5.2, nx 5.2)’Y š> AvÚ1.. > 4.1 É .0; Mc: > .8, ö 1.7, > 7.5 É .0).. "Á"(MaMb) ˜ g=92 MaQ  . Á6(HdL) ˜2 Ö 

(47)  »;Q.  `9 ‘’62

(48) ; ™ š> AvÚ. ¾12 '> \1. HdQ . g= Á"(HcMc). A(4.7) ‘e ’62

(49) > /0 šÇ1(21.1). >2 . ˜ HcP (Qe ‘ #(5.7)’> Q š> A. Á6(HdL) ˜9: HdQ Av. ‘e (24.6)’ »; C. v­1. L> . g=92 Hd  9 ÿ. P Ìm6¢_,   Ò {œ ö (7.8). ‘(6.9)’6 A ?9 ¥°   `/ ‘C`.  »;Q Q ¾´ Av­1. > ,† h †. (5.0)’6 A Hd  / b >6e j6w ‘Ö. 19; 2N6_ !Q .Q9 ¥°

(50) . (5.0)’62 g=Q šÇ1. Ž $ b > ˜9:2.  - > ±°31.. HdQ L  9 š ;Z/ – ]  C \. >h ,†. Á"(HcMc) ˜9:2 HcQ . 1. $Ï, Hd

(51)  " ‘`Â(4.0)’;  š> 3. ” ‚92 ‘e (14.2)’> Q š> Av­_, McQ. )2Y, >2 L  —>Q \ A L> i >. ” ‚92 ‘(6.8)’Q Q š> Av­1. . 6e j62 g=   / S 62 g=9 . L C–. Hc2 Mc ‘>’ P ‘ö’ 9 b. 6¢1. L; T   / ‘`Â(1.5)’6¢1.. $ ij/ ‘e (> 10.0, ö 3.3)’62 g=Q šÇ. Û, HdQ L e / EW  / ‘C`(4.0)’6. _ "L C–. Mc2 Hc ‘>’ ` ‘ö’9 ‘. 2 g=; T šÇ1. >@$ 2 L> ™ñ 6L. (> 4.1, ö 2.0)’62 g=Q šÇ1.. C– F>e L C– Hd9  )€QK 6. 

(52) Å4 

(53) 9:; . 2 ]> W*°  ® .

(54) / AvX. Á6(HdL) ˜9: »;Q ¾´ Av­1. HdQ . º/ Í$1. >2 6L C– FG `: . . g=92 ‘e (24.6)’> Q š> Av­_, ‘`. R`£/ [ C \2 h ,†9:   . Â(3.5)’P ‘h(3.5)’; ™ š> Av­1. L> . `/ UU Fa6_ {1 ¤  Ÿw$12 á. . g=92 HdP (Qe ‘e (14.1)’> Q.

(55) MN. P2 1¦  {w –1. „ MN9:. ¼ »; Av­A HdP ™    9. 66 + "6 ˜2 CD 5'9   . ÿ ‘(7.4)’ 6 A ‘h(7.1)’62

(56) ; š>. 12,13. 9 Ÿw6e f2 gs> \2Y, >2 . Av­1.   Ò {œ L C– HdQ L.  > 1¦ ,†  ±Ä 9´ š.  ‘>’ `/ ‘e ’62 g=Q šÇ1. Q. .e žª/ (K ‚. ] {.1.  .  m_ `/ ®  >6œ: ij/.  kl$ 9:2 bžk

(57) > ‘. VW e (2

(58)     9. >’ 9 6¢_, ‘É’ 2 3 )e fÇ1. x`  © C \1. ;  e /. (Hd  #: > 1.3, ö 1.3, > 3.0; L C. i 6œ  > s t C \5A, í. `: > .4, ö .8, > 3.8).. Q ij)2e, ³´ C`ƒ 62e ’/ 6.  ! "  #$. . 78e j62 g=92 †žª ¯9 C \/.

(59)   »; Table 49 56¢1. . ]>1.16 ¥°:  ‘e ’>   . Á (HaHb) ˜ ø$ Aùe 3Œ ,†9:2 ‘e. 9 : “s/ (2e ˜m6K L:2, ‘e. ’> <= š> Av­_, ‘h’>A ‘’2 òó ˜. ’ >× > ³´ O

(60) )2e9 b. %&. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(61)

(62)    :  . !"# $ %&. 525. Table 4. Mean frequency of listener's verbal behaviors1 Homogeneous HaHb Ask Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Repeat Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Agree Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Disagree Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Clarify Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Justify Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Point Out Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing Accept Understanding Planning Solving Reviewing. Ha 6.3 2.1 3.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 14.6 5.2 5.2 3.1 1.0 2.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 -. Heterogeneous MaMb. Hb 5.0 1.7 2.1 1.3 12.9 2.5 3.3 5.0 2.1 .4 .4 1.3 .8 .4 1.7 .8 .8 -. Ma 3.9 2.3 1.6 .8 .8 4.7 4.7 .8 .8 21.1 4.7 7.8 6.3 2.3 3.9 .8 3.1 -. HcMc Mb 1.7 .4 .9 .4 .4 .4 2.1 .4 .9 .9 2.1 .9 1.3 .4 .4 -. Hc 5.0 1.7 .8 1.7 .8 8.3 3.3 2.5 2.5 .8 .8 14.2 .8 3.3 10.0 2.5 .8 1.7 -. HdL Mc 3.4 .7 1.4 1.4 6.8 .7 2.0 4.1 .7 .7 3.4 1.4 1.4 .7. Hd 3.5 .8 2.3 .4 1.2 1.2 2.3 .8 1.5 .4 .4 3.5 1.2 2.3 24.6 1.9 5.4 17.3 -. L 7.1 1.0 3.4 2.7 1.0 .7 .3 7.4 2.4 3.0 2.0 1.0 .7 .3 .3 .3 14.1 1.3 4.4 7.7 .7 .3 .3 -. 1. corrected for 10 minutes..  N·  ¸¹  ‹#Q \1. „ MN .  '().  Ì¿Ò  ».  kl9: >9 b ”ž Ê6¢A, {1. ; Table 59 56¢1. Ö  ‘bÀ¿’ . š m• b  $ Ë× MNQ ‹#61..  Ì¿> šÇ2Y, ? "9:; ‘ #-’Q. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5.

(63) . 526 Table 5. Mean frequency of verbal interactions1. Homogeneous (Solver) Solver dominant type Problem solving. Correct Listener dominant type. (Listener). Agree Repeat Accept Agree Point out. Ask Symmetrical type Problem solving Require agreement. (Solver). Modify Agree. Point out Agree Clarify Point out Agree Point out Repeat Ask. Point out Disagree. Provide Agree Justify Justify Disagree Justify. HaHb. Heterogeneous MaMb. HcMc. HdL. Ha. Hb. Ma. Mb. Hc. Mc. Hd. L. 4.6 .4 -. 9.5 1.1 -. .9 .4 -. .8 2.3 .8. 4.1 .7 -. 3.3 -. 1.0 .7 -. .8 .4. 1.1. .4 -. 4.7 1.6 -. .4 -. 4.2 -. .7 -. 5.0 3.8 .4 -. 4.0 1.0 .3. .4 .4 4.2 .8 1.7 1.3 .4 -. 1.1 5.3 1.1 2.1 1.1 -. .9 .9 .4 .9 .9 -. 1.6 1.6 .8 1.6 .8 -. 2.7 1.4 2.0 -. 1.7 1.7 2.5 1.7 -. .3 1.0 3.0 .3 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0. .4 1.2 .8 1.5 .4 .8 .4 .8 -. 1. corrected for 10 minutes.. ¼ »; AvX1. ‘ (;¿’9:2 ‘>-. -(1.6)’ »;Q Á6(HdL) ˜ je f´ ;. ’Q, ‘ (;¿’9:2 ‘e -C`’> š> Av­1.. 1. >2

(64) / ˜m$ (Tables 3, 4) ”. Á (HaHb) ˜9:2 !Q  ¨©/ 6¯". $ "L C– F>°; : 1¦ '/ Av. ]. 9 3§>  (;¿. ‘>-’Q òó .  ”Æ62 >1. ?@A bÀ¿ (Table.  "9: Q š> Av­_(Ha 4.6, Hb 9.5), bÀ. 5)9:2 MaP MbQ  Ì¿1 ™Ó$ »;. ¿  "9:2 ‘ #-’ »;Q Q.  AvX , : Ìm$ gs; \º/ < C \1.. ;1(Ha 4.2, Hb 5.3). >2

(65) (Table 3)9:. ?9 > ,† '2 1¦ ,†9 ™ .  # »;Q ¼ ] 3Š> \1. Û$ > ˜. Ö   »;Q 12 ]/ G C. 9:2 !Q  ¨©/ 6¯"9 3§> . \1. >2 „ MN b . 4Œ ,† QûY "Á. (;¿ >  AvAe f ] {W . "(MaMb) ˜ m 0 C–> Q HÇK ‚”. Q UU  i ²12 ]/ < C \1.. C \1. Û, „ MN9:2 0; >ø ú./ _€. Á (HaHb) ˜ 1¦ ' " 6A2

(66) . 6e fÇ2Y, > ,† FG> 1¦ ,†9.  »;9 ™  »;Q b . ™ m, 2R> ¾ A Xs . 0>/ e?/. ¾12 ].Y >2 :

(67) 9 b =B. Q®0; \1.18,19. Ö겺/ Í$1.. Á"(HcMc) ˜9:2 HcQ ” ‚ ‘e -C. "Á"(MaMb) ˜2  MaQ  Mb i. `(4.2)’  (;¿ > Q š> Av­. j/ ‘e ’62 ] 5$  (;¿ . 2Y ? »;Q Á6(HdL) ˜9: L> ” ‚. > Q š> Av­1. , ‘e -C`(4.7)’ ‘e. P Ìm6¢1.  (;¿>A bÀ¿ 9 Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(68)

(69)    :  . !"# $ %&. 527. :2 Œ.9 $ —>Q  §1. > ,†9:. MN ,

(70)  »;2 Á6 ˜9: ¾. Avz ' ”ž 9 »;Q †"). ´ Av­1. Á ˜9:2

(71) 9 ™ . 2 gs> \12 4>1. ,† N0 S^9 3$ á.  »;Q b  ¾´ AvA, :.

(72) MNG9 6œ "L C– FG9´2 ". 

(73) 9 b =B Ö겺/ < C \. 6 òó C– FG N0| >h ,†9 ™. 1. "Á" ˜2  »;Q W 1¦. h ,†> ÌÄ61_ {_)1.7,13 ?@A „. ,†9 ™ N0‡' > F6e j$. MN >h ,†. "(HcMc) ˜2 h ,. ] Av­1.. †. ""(MaMb) ˜P ™ © ‚, "L C–9´ 2Ä6´ $1_ {K €@1..  Ì¿Ò {œ A Q (;6 2 ¿{12 b· ‘bÀ¿’> šÇ1. ? "9:. Á6(HdL) ˜9:2 Ö  1¦ ,†9 ™. ‘ #-’Q š> Av­2Y, ,† N0 S^.   »;Q ¾´ Av­1. HdQ . 9 3§> Q L F. g= ßG@31.. . g=92 bÀ¿ > š> Av­_, . >2 L C– FG> ¼ €Z §>  . . g=92  (;¿9 62 ‘e -C`. 6œ: ;"9 # > wžA  wž ¬.6. (5.0)’ ‘e -(3.8)’Q Q š> Av­1. Q. K L$ ‘ #’

(74) / š> Av. Y: ™H|.  ij/ e ²/ ‚ Q > >6e. ]>1. L C– N0| ,†9:2 . j6 A ³´ C`ƒ ©e òA2 g=92 â. (;¿. ‘>-’ > C 3 )2Y,. € ž` . Q AvB C; \1.16 > ,†9:. > ¨5  > ÿ˜I´ O

(75) )K ‚>1.. Hd e > ý 24.6‘ Avz ]/ _€6œ(Table 4),. ?@A ÿ ‘’62

(76) >   s 9. L> >9 6 A ij/ C`$ g=Q bC 36%. ;Z/ (e2 j62 ] ˜m)I,16 1-. `; |1. 1¦ ,†9:; >P Ìm$ Q A. $ / JO© ‹#Q \/ ]>1.. v­1. "Á"(MaMb) ˜9:2 MbQ Ma ‘e.    »; ˜m$ 9:2 b·. (Table 4)’/ ֓$ . ‘e -C`’ ‘. ‘>’  »;Q ¾´ Av­_, L C– FG. e -’ ™ (Table 5)> D 30%>_, Á".  ‘>’A ‘ö’ P 3Š|

(77) / Av. (HcMc) ˜9:2 Hc ‘e ’9 b McQ ij/ ‘. XK; 6¢1. >@$ 2 `ü . / #N6. C`’$ g=Q D 29%>1. 66A "6 ˜Q. 2  0>9 K.$ ] {>+, L C– .   9  Ÿw6e fÇ

(78) 4/ _€©. FG g=92   `9: {1 "#$ . ‚, > ,†9 þ62 6L C– F >h . ,. G/ _€6_ \º/ < C \1. ?@A ‘É’ . † N0/  ¼ ;Z/ E ] {.1. %,. P 3Š|

(79)   AvAe fÇ2Y, >2 F.  UU  ƒ 62 . G> É `/ i ÆK fK ‚” ]>1. ‘.   0 , 0 C–> H FG g= . ö’ P ‘É’ 9: #N62 `G  . h †9: ¯Ô2 R`£{12 L C– F. 9: <= "#$ ¨©/ ª62 ] {_)I. žE ;Z> Î "#$ ] |1.. ,20-22 FG9´ > `G C

(80) / JO5K C \ 2 SR/ òL© ‹#Q \1.. 

(81)  . „ MN  Í-  ‚, h ,† > h ,† '/ ™ Ê6K2 M1. ? {. „ MN9:2  9: m 0. 12 Á ˜P Aùe 3Œ ,† m> —>Q ß. C–9 ¥° h ,†(  , "") >h. G@3_, ”$ "L C– F”e°; : 1¦. ,†( ", 6)/ N06w, .

(82) / AvX1. Û, 6 ˜9:2 6L. / ˜m6¢1. / kl6K L ÷ . C– F;  ®    9 Ÿw. P 

(83) / ý 17Œ Ì¿Ò ˜m6. 6¢1.  9:. ¢_, »;Q ¼

(84) / "½   . $ MN149:; m 0 C–9 $ h † >. (>-ö->-É); ˜m6¢1.. h † —>2 AvAe fÇ1. >  0. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5. C y ˜m.

(85) . 528. N0‡> 2«9 R)_, ¨© kª> NO6+,  Q UU  ƒ 6I, 1¦ ,†  2 >$ Q Avz ]  C \1. ?@A WPQe  9: ,† N0 S^9 b$ MN2 { . C–>I, þ . MNQ ‹#61. $Ï, 7B  . 5õ 0  Nk$ m.  0 C– R`0> / C \_ Œ. .  0> MN9 “s/ ÍR C \I, ”‘ . Ém {12 !  6 A, {1 v$ 0 ; Ém ŒF6 A, m•C S€ m 0 C– 9 $ y ݘm  ‹#Q \1. Û$, 0; >ø 1-$ .e ` ú.9 b ,† N 0 S^ y ˜m  ‹#Q \1. Ž Gœ . m P‰ 3Š \/ ] Kb)2 m, 2R>A Xøs0 ’9 $ y ˜m {Wƒ $1. ?Ä_  9: bS .

(86) 9 $ “s/ E/ Q®0; \I, 5' 9 ¥¦

(87)  úÂ ˜m62 MN; >-. Tƒ © ]>1..   1. Stewart, J.; Hafner, R. Science Education 1991, 75, 105. 2. Whimbey, A; Lochhead, J. Problem solving and comprehension; Lawren Erlbaum Associated: Hilsdale, 1986. 3. Dorman, N. H. The effects of a problem-solving course on secondary school students' analytical skills, reasoning ability and scholastic aptitude; Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland College Park, 1990. 4. Glass, A. R. The effects of thinking aloud pair problem solving on technology education students’ thinking pro-. cesses, procedures, and problem solutions (pair problemsolving); Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minesota, 1992. 5. Narode, R.; Heiman, M.; Lochhead, J.; Slomianko, J. Teaching Thinking Skills: Science; National Education Association: Washington, DC, 1987. 6. Weiss, C. A. Learning to think thinking to learn: Improving college students' thinking through pair problemsolving; Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1990. 7. ; ;   2000, 44, 356. 8. Nattiv, A. Elementary School Journal 1994, 94, 285. 9. Hooper, S.; Hannafin, M. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1988, 4, 413. 10. Okebukola, P. A.; Ogunniyi, M. B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1984, 21, 875. 11. Webb, N. M. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982, 74, 642. 12. Haney, A. E. Problem-solving behavior of cooperative pairs in a fifth-grade mathematics class; Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1994. 13. Linchevski, L.; Kutscher, B. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1998, 29, 533. 14. ;  ;

(88) ;     . 15. Pestel, B. C. Science Education 1993, 77, 83. 16. ;    2000, 20, 624. 17. ;    2002, 22, 411. 18. ; ; 

(89) ; ;      2000, 20, 174. 19. ; 

(90) ; ; ;      2000, 20, 43. 20. ;    1988, 8, 43. 21. ; ; ;    1996, 16, 389. 22. Huffman, D. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1997, 34, 551.. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society.

(91)

(92)    :  . !"# $ %&. 529. < *+ 1>.   . (

(93) ). (  ). .   .

(94)  

(95)  !  " #$% &' ( ) * +,- &. /&'( 0 12 34 56 78 9. :. .

(96) "   3 * ;<4 : = >?  "  &8 9.

(97) . @.  . (

(98) ).  . .  "

(99)  ;<4 @A >?

(100) "  &'( 

(101) 4 &8 9.  . B.  @.

(102) " C%D  E B&F  " ) &'( ) * ;<G ,4 @&8 9. I.   J.

(103) "  E I&F  "   &'(  * +,- &. /&'( ;<G ,4 @&8 9. . KL B @. !H. 2003, Vol. 47, No. 5.

(104)  

(105)  !  " 0 M  N&'( ; OP8 ,4 B&'( ;<G ,4 @ &8 9. B.  Q RL.   B !

(106) " &'( ST 4 Q&'( 0 34 U&8 9. @. , RL.  "

(107)  ;<4 @A >?

(108) "  &'( 0 34 U&8 9. ,. RL.  "

(109)  3 34 U&8 9. !. !A >?

(110) " 0 .

(111)

참조

관련 문서

The objective of the present study is to identify psychological home environment variables that may improve children's interpersonal cognitive problem

What is the effect of psychodrama on child aggressiveness subareas, including negativeness, excitedness, violence, verbal aggressiveness and

Fifth, in the influence that the communicative style exerts on the level of marital satisfaction, the Global Distress by Talking, problem-solving, Spite

In this study, it expect that the student's school achievement skills and the mathematical problem solving skills increase according to textbook of an

So, if sixth graders of elementary school was provided the class unit art therapy program applying the creative problem solving model developed in this

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the “problem solving and programming” area of ​​information subject on perception and

Children's experience of life sdtress: The role of family social support and social problem-solving skills as protective factors.. “Social competence: An

Purpose: The present study was conducted to understand nursing students’ self-esteem, problem-solving ability, professionalism, and career identity, and to