Oral Health and Related Factors for the Elderly
전체 글
(2) *>ö &j &æ 7" jº& ® . ~òV&~ Ïf B ;j Fæ~ î÷j .O~ ¾ ~ò~¶~º ;&N ¯* . ¯*º öB Þ/ ' G ö ò jî¢ ~òV&ö & 7"ê fê pf &NWj <º . Straussf Ronald º § ¶¢¾ j &çb ÒöB &ç¶~ 50.0% çf ~j& Îf â η, _. V. ï>«~ Ã&º jV~ Ü~ îö & &j <² ~&b, 7öBê " &7 &Nj &æ ®º ;ö & &f /³ê ¸jæ ® . ~ &Ú ;; Næ~º j7j ' r, ;f Corresponding author Tel: 011-450-5831 E-mail: ridia1129@naver.com. 1). .
(3) . Oral Health and Related Factors for the Elderly. V, _º © ¶VV, _V¾ bV, Þn ö 'Ëj ~ 7 38.0%º ~j& ¢>' ;ö 'Ëj ~&b McGrathf Bedi º 876«~ 65^ ç j Z ·* F;~ ;;ç 5 ;¯**~ &ê¢ Ò Ö" Ò²' æö îæï ~" O^ê~ *" îæï ~"O^~ F, ¶V B ~jF~>, ~~çf &N ®º ©b ®, Petersen f Ò4jîj W~ ;; ÒöB 65.0%f 0f W 55.0%º * ö ~j¾ ;b Û~ ãþj &æ ®îb ~" O^(1j *)f 0f W~ ãÖ 60.0%, ~ ã Ö ~ 43.0% ©b ~& . Gilbert, Branchf Orav º *Ú $º ¦ª'b ~j& ² B Ò² J®J ~ " ~ò¢ z ¶" Aæ pb ~òj¢ æ® ËK z ì ;*¯ÿj z '² >¯ º ê ® . Sheiham f ;;çf Úîïæ>*~ &ê ï&ö B 65^ ç ~ ;¦Òf V 5 Ú G;' ¦Ò¢ Af Ö", ~j& ìº Ò² (12.3%)f 11B ç~ ~j¢ &ê Ò² (2.9%) Ú7 F &ËW F~~ ² ¾æÒb, Úîï æ>~ ãÖ, 1-10B~ ~j¢ &ê Ò ² " 11B ç~ ~j¢ &ê Ò² Òö Ûê'b. Ö F~ N& &VB:, '' 24.0%f 2.9%& Ú7 î . 21B ò~ ¶~¢ &ê Ò² f ï 21-32 B~ ~j¢ &ê Ò² jò¢ &ËW 3V z ¸~. ~& . ~ ;;f *;" &7 &NW ®b º ~ Ü~ î" çÖB " > ® . V ¢B ~ ;;çö ~º 'Ë Zíæ¢ C® ~ ;;j ËçÒ > ®º ;k&n j Bnb ÖÒ¾¢ ~ ;; {¢ Û §'b Ü~ îj ËçÒ > ®º On îNF jº& ® . ö º ";þöB ~ ; ¦ê¶ò¢ Ï~ ~ ;;çö 'Ëj ~º æ j ªC~, ~ ;;" *;"~ &NWj «~ ~ ;;j ÃêÊV * J« Îj B~¶ ~& . 2). 3). 4). 5). \ç5O». \ç 5 `Ò8* j 1ú¦V 12úræ ";þ æ &«¶ ;¦ê(1N)j Af 65^ ç 9,340«j &ç b ~& . æ~ F;f *~f ΢ J~ 1N &*(7, ê)º Þ~ºÂj ~ 2ê ~¦*æ (, , )f Z·* ºÂ~& . 2. ª+O» >÷B ¶òº Bê ¦^z ·ë" >;·ëj ö SPSS WIN 10.0" AMOS 4.0j Ï~ ªC~& . ªCO»b ªÖ ªCj ~Vöº '~æ pf ¿ ê W>Ú ®º ãÖ 2ª; ¿ê >;~&. Î~ 'ê 6;f 'ê æ>(GFI: goodness-of-fitindex), jv 'ê æ>(CFI: comparative fit index), jR 'ê æ>(TLI: Turker-Lewis index), "Òö² ï¶ßº 1.. 2002. N(RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation) ~& . ;;çö & ¶Î ãê>~ F~Wf V'j(Critical Ratio)¢ V&b ~&b, Ûê' F~>& f .&~& 1.96 ç(p<0.05), 2.576 ç(p<0.01), 3.291 ç(p<0.001)b 6~& . Ö 1.. . Ú*¦Òf \;;çf~ N9. Ú*¦Òf ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Î j » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.998, CFI& 0.955, TLI& 0.911, RMSEA& 0.023b 'ê& ;>î . ãê>º 0.09îb V'j(CR)º 6.017 (p<0.000) ¾æ¾ Ú*¦Òº ;;çö F~~² 'Ë j ~ ®î (Fig. 1).. ya1: obesity level ya2: acuity ya3: audition ya4: blood pressure yb1: urine sugar yb2: urine protein yb3: urine occult yb4: urine pH yc1: hematoglobin yc2: blood sugar yc3: total cholesterol yc4: SGOT yc5: SGPT yc6: γGTP yh1: dental caries yd1: sweet food yd2: tough and hard food yd3: snack ye1: drinking frequency ye2: smoking frequency ye3: drinking amount yf1: visiting a clinic yf2: oral prophylaxis yf3: toothbrushing yg1: tooth sensitivity to cold food yg2: tooth sensitivity to toothbrushing yg3: gingival bleeding yg4: temporomandibular joint sound yg5: temporomandibular joint pain yg6: halitosis yh1: dental caries yh2: missing teeth yh3: periodontal disease yh4: dental abrasion 'JH . Relation of Each Factor to Oral Health Status. º ¦Òf \;;çf~ N9 º ¦Òf ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Îj » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.998, CFI & 0.961, TLI& 0.933, RMSEA& 0.020b 'ê& ;>î . ¾ ãê>º 0.00îb V'j(CR)& 1.286 ¾æ¾ º ¦Òº ;;çö 'Ëj ~æ p~ 2..
(4) . Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 91~95 (2004). (Fig. 1). 3.. .W¦Òf \;;çf~ N9. .¦Òf ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Î j » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.996, CFI& 0.971, TLI& 0.959 RMSEA& 0.024 'ê& ; >î . ãê>º 0.08îb V'j(CR)º 2.491(p<0.013) ¾æ¾ .¦Òº ;;çö F~~² 'Ëj ~ ®î (Fig. 1). 4.. Û \;;çf~ N9. Û&" ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Îj » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.993, CFI & 0.965, TLI& 0.934, RMSEA& 0.044 'ê& ; >î . ãê>º 0.11îb V'j(CR)& 3.822(p<0.000) ¾æ¾ Û&f ;;çö F~~² 'Ëj ~ ®î (Fig. 1).. r" . W \;;çf~ N9 r" . " ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Î j » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.998, CFI& 0.996, TLI& 0.993, RMSEA& 0.021 'ê& ;>î . ãê>º 0.13îb V'j(CR)& 6.511 (p<0.000) ¾æ¾ r" . f ;;çö F~~² ' Ëj ~ ®î (Fig. 1). 6. ~ò . .O \;;çf~ N9 ~ò . .O" ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Î j » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.995, CFI& 0.950, TLI& 0.904, RMSEA& 0.040b 'ê& ;>î . ãê>º 0.12&b V'j(CR)º 4.097 (p<0.000) ¾æ¾ ;Ãçf ;;çö F~~² 'Ë j ~ ®î (Fig. 1). 7. \;Ãç \;;çf~ N9 ;Ãç" ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Î j » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.994, CFI& 0.978, TLI& 0.964, RMSEA& 0.029 'ê& ;>î . ãê>º 0.30îb V'j(CR)º 9.651 (p<0.000)b ¾æ¾ ;Ãçf ;;çö F~~² ' Ëj ~ ®î (Fig. 1). 8. ' º \;;çf~ N9 ' º" ;;çf~ &NWj ¦Ã~V * Îj » ê Î 'ê¢ ÚÚ Ö", GFI& 0.974, CFI & 0.912, TLI& 0.901, RMSEA& 0.030b 'ê& ;>î . Ú*¦Òf ;;çf~ &êöB ãê>º 0.05, V'j(CR) 4.233(p<0.000), .¦Òf ;;çf ~ &êöB ãê>º 0.01, V'j(CR) 1.977(p<0.05), Û&" ;;çf~ &êöB ãê>º 0.08, V'j (CR) 5.310(p<0.0 00) r" . " ;;çf~ &êö B ãê>º 0.10, V'j(CR) 3.288(p<0.001), ~ò . .O 5.. " ;;çf~ &êöBº ãê>º 0.60, V'j(CR) 12.476(p<0.000), ;Ãç" ;;çf~ &êöB ã ê>º 0.27, V'j(CR) 11.801(p<0.000) ¾æ¾ F~~² 'Ëj ~ ®î . Ú*¦Ò, .¦Ò, Û&, r" . , ~ò ..O, ;Ãç ;;çö F~~² 'Ëj ~ ®º ©b C&r (Fig. 1). . V. f ¶~ ; ÚöB ² rW Ã&~ ~;W /ê>Ú ~"î~~ . V; ~f"f b ~jÖÃræ BÎ ~&b Linden" Mullally ~ öBê B~f ~Fö ±æ pf 'Ëj ~º ©b ~& . öBê ¶f r"¶º j¶, jr"¶ö j ~jÖÃ" ~"î~, ~jÖ¶N ¸~ . Krall" Dawson -Hughes º çö ~ ~j ¶ j Ò~V * ÊÊ MAö B ºÂB W(40-70^) 584«" ÎW 1,231«(21-75^)j &çb Ò Ö" *Ò ¶& *Ò j¶º "ö j Ò² ~j ¶ ç® ¸~b, 248« ~ W (º'ÒV*=6Û2j)" 977«~ ÎW (Mean=18Û 7j)j ê³ &V Ö" j æ³ Ò² f j¶ö j ~j ¶ *þê& ÎWf 2.4V ¸~ Wf 3.5V ¸~ . ÎWf j 7 ê *&~² *Ú îæò j ¶ º *® ¸~. ÎW f ~j ¶ *þê & 4.5V Ã&® . Taani º 3Bú ÿn C 1,098B ~ B~B ~j¢ &æ Ö", Ï~(56.4%)& B~~ "º öîb ~"î~(23.4%) rb ô~ ºf 20.2%¢ ~ Ö"¢ ææ~& . Michelle, Henshaw, Calabrese ö ~~ ~~¢ Ò². f &¦ª~ '·² S >& ; ~j¢ &ê Ò² ö j 20% Ôj, '·çº ;î~~ B÷" ê¯ö ' Ëj ~ ç^·Ïf ö² ®ÚB ß® 7º ~ . Ö f ~~& ¾ º Ò²ö² Nê r Fj BÊV r^ . j* ~~¢ Ò² f j* ~j¢ &æ ®¾ ¦ª'b &æ ®º Ò² ö j "¢" ¢j¢ _º ©b rJ^ ® . V¢B ~~ ËO¶ '·Sö ÚJæ ì² ; ®º '·j S > ®ê R&zB BB jº © . Þ, ~"²º ~"î~ö ~ 'Ëj Aº *W î~~ B æ>¢ BÒ~& . ¯ ~" 6"f ¢¦ Ò². ~ * ;ö ç 'Ëj > ®b ¢; *W î~~ *þ æRB~ j > ® BR~& . Hujoel f ~"î~" .& Òö 7º &NWj B~&b, Joshipura f k ;;" &çÿ Ëî~(CHD)*~ &Wj "î, ; *^ j &çb 6j*~ º'(HPFS)öB ~"î~ ®º © b B ÎW &Ú ~j>& 10 ~ Ò²f ~j >& 25 Ò²ö j CHD*þê& ¸~b F¯ ~"î ~ ìº Ò² ÒöBº &N ìº ©j «~& . F¯~ Ö"ö On~ ¶º ~ Ú*¦ Ò, º ¦Ò, .¦Ò, Û&, r"f , ;Ãç"~ & Wynder, Bross, Feldman6) (Gram) 7). 8). 9). 10). 11). 12). 13). 14). 12).
(5) . Oral Health and Related Factors for the Elderly. NWj O; Îj Ï~ ¦Æ~& . O; Îf ç&ê> $º æï 8j Ï~ ëãæ>f «³ æ>, Bæ>*~ &ê¢ ÿö «~º V»b G;Î ö & ºªC" Îö & ãªC ÿö Ú^B ôf *çö & "' &ê¢ ¢N~ ÿ¢ Fç öB { > ®º V»b " ~ò'öBê Ï ~² >î . b&, ' ¦ÒÏö & WBvæW((construct validity) j {~V *~ &Gæ>¢ ¶Î ~º ¶Î j »~ 'ê(good ness of fit)¢ { ê, Ú*¦Ò, .¦Ò, º ¦Ò, Û&, r" . , ~ò . .O;Ãç, ;;ç ''~ WBvæW ªCf O; Îj ÒÏ~ ¦Æ~& . Î~ 'ê 6;f 'ê æ>(goodness-of-fit-index: GFI), jv 'ê æ>(comparative fit index: CFI), jR ' ê æ>(Turker-Lewis index: TLI), "Òö² ï¶ßºN (root mean square error of approximation: RMSEA) ~& . GFIº &Ë ¢>'b ÒÏ~º 'ê æ>B Î R ªÖ¯R $º R ç&¯Rj J«~º jNj ~ . 'ê æ>f >; 'ê æ>º Îö ~ J«>º æï " ªÖ~ ç&' ·j ¾æÞ . 'ê æ>º R~ V& æï ;ª
(6) & jò ãÖöê 'Ëj Aæ pb, "Úê Î ¶ò¢ âî¾ ¾ J«~ºæ & . 8f Û 0~1.0 Òö ®b, 0.90ç ±f 'ê¢ . . R>& 200 ç¢ ãÖ 'ê æ>& 'Úê 0.90 ç ' Î, 0.95ç ±f ΢ " > ® . CFIº Z&ê Î" &JÎj jvB V& ¦~º ;ê¢ 'æ> R* ©b Ûç 0.9ç ' Î 0.95ç ±f ΢ > ® . TLIº Bentlerf Bonett & B æ> ' ΢ r 1.0ö &rÚ >~¢ ¾æÚº ©b b²º 1 8j Vê ~, 0.9ç ·^~ ' ΢ ï&B . RMSEAº ªC¶ò¦V êÖB ªÖ ¯R" æ>¢ º;~ ÒÖ ªÖ ¯R~ ö²*ö âî¾ N& ®º&¢ & . 8 ·j> ±f ΢ > ®b , ªC¶ò& ç&¶ò¢ r RMSEA 8f 0.08~ ¾ º Î *"B . ç~ ";j Û º ¦Ò¢ B Î º ; ;çö 'Ëj ~º ºªj {~&b, & ê¢ O; Î B~& . , º ;þöB Ò ¶ò¢ ÒªC~& V r^ö ÚϪCö ®ÚB ôf B6 ®î . ß® v G>&, ãB>&, '·ç f ;ç¢ J«~V * 7º æ> ÒÏö ^®îV r^ö &NWj ªC > ìî . $ ;¦êj Af 7öB ~"¦ êj Aæ pf Ò² ªCöB B>îbæ ¶ò~ & RWö ^B6 ® . Ï'ö ² ê³B ¶ò~ Öj Û Ò & b~ "B . 15). 16). 17). 16). 18). 16). º. £. º ; f &Nºj ªC~ &Nº~. ¶Îj »~º Ï' ® . &綺 2002j 1ú¦V 12úræ ";þ æ&« ¶ ;¦ê(1N)j Af 65^ ç 9,340« . &ç¶ º ;¦êj
(7) Î ¦êj A ^êR¢ ·W . ªC~ "ºÖ"º r" ?. 1. WBvæWö & ¦Æ Ú*¦Ò, º ¦Ò, .¦Ò, Û&, r" ., ~ ò . .O, ;Ãç, ;;ç ¶Î~ W BvæWf 'ê æ> GFI, CFI, TLI, RMSEA¢ Ï~ ªC Ö" Îv ' º*ö ®îbæ WBvæWf ;>î . 2. ' º" ;;çf~ &NWj V * O ; Îj ªC Ö" º ¦Ò¢ B Î º ;;çö 'Ëj ~ ®r {>îb ¢ J« «' Îj » > ®î . ç~ Ö", ~" O^" ~^î ãþ 'f ³2æ êæö j ~jÖÃ, ~j Ö¶N, ~~jº¶N ¸ ~b, r" . ~jÖÃ, ~"î~, ~jÖ¶Nö ¦;' 'Ëj " ®rj { > ®î . $ ~"î~f * Ú~ 43.2%öB &V>îb Ôf _öB ô {>î . &¦ª~ ;î~f R: ;;¯ÿ~ Âb .O &Ë~æ * ' æ ²¢ 7b ;*^&ö ~ : Û&" ;;&Òö & ;vG Úê'b Ú^¢ ~, ãB', æÒ' Ë ~"V&j O^~æ á~¾ ~^î, ~~ËO ~ ; ;¯*¢ ²f® ~æ pê ~V * ~" ~òBjÊ 7"ê¢ ¸®º ;k*~ ºB . $, ;;çf *;"~ &NWj J«~V * Îj »~V *Bº ;{ ¦ÒO»" Î"' æR BB F¯>Ú¢ . öBº ";þ öB BB Ïj & 'Ï~&V r^ö Î W ö ê6 ®î . Ëê ê³' & jº ©b Ò òB . ^^ò 1. Strauss RP, Ronald JH: Understanding the value of teeth to older adults: Influences on the qualty of life. J A D A 124: 105-114, 1993. 2. McGrath C, Bedi R: Influences of social support on the oral health of older people in Britain. Journal of oral rehabilitation 29: 918-922, 2002. 3. Petersen PE, et al.: Oral health behavior and attitudes of adults in Lithuania. Acta Odontol Scand 58: 243-248, 2000. 4. Gilbert GH, Branch LG, Orav EJ: Predictors of older adults longitudinal dental care use: Ten year results. Medical Care 28(12): 1165-1180, 1990. 5. Sheiham A, et al.: The relationship between oral health status and Body Mass Index among older people: A national survey of older people in Great Britain. British Dental Journal 192: 703706, 2002. 6. Wynder EL, Bross LJ, Feldman RM: A study of the etiological factors in cancer of the mouth cancer. Dent Res 10: 1300, 1967. 7. Derdivanis JP, Bushmaker S, Dagenais F: Effects of a mouth wash in an irrigating device on accumulation and maturation of.
(8) Journal of Dental Hygiene Science Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 91~95 (2004) dental plaque. J Periodontol 49: 480-482, 1978.. 8. Linden GJ, Mullally, BH: Cigarette smoking and periodontal destruction in young adults. J Periodontol 65: 718-723, 1994. 9. Krall EA, Dawson-Hughes B, Garvey AJ, Garcia RI: Smoking, smoking cessation, and tooth loss. Dent Res 76(10): 1653-16 59, 1997. 10. Taani DSMQ: Periodontal reasons for tooth extraction in an adult population in Jordan. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 30: 110-112, 2003. 11. Michelle MH, Henshaw MM, Calabrese JM: Nutrition in clinical care 4(1): 34-42, 2001. 12. Joshipura KJ, Willet WC, Douglass CW: Poor oral health and coronary heart disease. J Dent Res 75(9): 1631-1636, 1996. 13. Clemencia M, Vargas CM, Yellowitz JA, Hayes KL: Oral health. 14.. . status of older rural adults in the United States. J. A. D. A. 134: 479-486, 2003. Hujoel PP, Darngsholt M, Spiekerman C, Derouen TA: Periodontal disease and coronary heart disease risk. J. A. M. A. 284(11): 1406-1410, 2000. : : Lisrel . 3(2): 94-100, 1994. : Lisrel . : 1996. Bentler PM, Bonett DG: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88: 588-606, 1980. : . : , 1990. (Received November 11, 2004; Accepted December 21, 2004). ç *^\f Î j Ï \Î;%
(9) bR *^ö\ ~ \O; Î *Þ 'æ^zÒ 16. .V 15.. 17.. 18.. *[ æï `ª+ *Þ 9öÒ.
(10)
관련 문서
Oral Health Educational Diagnosis of Dental Hygienist
The Oral health status (such as subjective oral heal th status, toothache) and oral health behaviors (such as tooth brush, or al health examination) were
The experimental group consisted of 458 children from two schools that have oral health centers run by Suncheon Public Health Department, and the control group consisted of
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between mental health and experience of falling in some local elderly people using the 2013
Therefore, the teachers need to communicate actively on children's health status with medical staffs and be educated for understanding the children with
The first public medical insurance act enacted in 1963 and according to the Amendment in 1976 became the health care insurance compulsorily.. The national
Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe.. Journal of Health Economics
Abstract: This study aimed to review the oral hygiene status, oral care guidelines, and outcomes of oral care in intensive care unit (ICU) patients from a dental