• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Study on osseointegration of dental implant according to the surface treatment methods in adult beagle dog

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Study on osseointegration of dental implant according to the surface treatment methods in adult beagle dog"

Copied!
61
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)
(2)

의학 박사학위 논문

아 주 대 학 교 대 학 원

의 학 과

(3)

지도교수 황 병 남

이 논문을 의학 박 사 학 위 논문으로 제출함.

2004년 2월

아 주 대 학 교 대 학 원

의 학 과

박 인 규

(4)

박 인 규 의 의 학 박 사 학 위 논 문 을 인 준 함.

심 사 위 원 장 인

심 사 위 원 인

심 사 위 원 인

심 사 위 원 인

심 사 위 원 인

아 주 대 학 교 대 학 원

2003년 12월 19일

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)

20

-농도 (%) 9.6 19.4 28.8 45 60

Ra ( 1.01 1.24 1.29 1.30 1.18

(26)
(27)

22

-Time (min) 2 3 4 5 6

Ra ( 1.05 1.09 1.27 1.15 1.04

(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)

26 -Group Contact Surface Density

M6 34.0 41.0 M6 41.2 71.5 M6 46.0 66.1 M6 41.1 70.4 M6 30.0 37.0 M6 58.2 52.9 M6 53.4 61.5 M6 39.7 52.3 M6 47.0 45.0 B6 68.5 45.4 B6 72.0 81.0 B6 60.4 64.3 B6 65.5 77.0 B6 43.6 63.2 B6 61.5 59.8 B6 49.0 65.8 B6 68.0 73.2 B6 67.3 57.7 BE6 65.0 75.6 BE6 77.4 84.0 BE6 79.4 78.3 BE6 70.6 65.7 BE6 66.1 77.9 BE6 87.0 85.6 BE6 75.0 80.9 BE6 80.9 87.8 BE6 85.4 78.5

(32)

27 -Group Contact Surface Density

M12 69.6 77.5 M12 81.0 54.9 M12 72.3 82.8 M12 76.0 53.6 M12 77.7 63.8 M12 63.0 74.8 M12 88.0 73.7 M12 64.8 59.8 M12 71.0 66.9 B12 74.0 65.8 B12 63.9 79.6 B12 78.7 85.2 B12 80.0 71.2 B12 85.8 89.0 B12 72.0 68.7 B12 78.6 81.2 B12 83.9 72.8 B12 73.1 67.1 BE12 83.0 83.0 BE12 86.6 86.4 BE12 99.7 90.3 BE12 82.5 82.9 BE12 95.4 79.2 BE12 95.1 89.0 BE12 86.5 85.8 BE12 88.0 86.0 BE12 89.1 84.3

(33)

28 -0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Machined blasted Blasted & Etched %

Surface

(34)

29 -0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Machined Blasted Blasted & Etched %

Surface

(35)

30 -0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Machined blasted Blasted & Etched %

Density

(36)

31 -0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Machined Blasted Blasted & Etched %

Density

(37)

32

-0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Machined

blasted

Blasted &

Etched

%

Surface & Density

Surface Density

(38)

33

-0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Machined

Blasted

Blasted &

Etched

%

Surface & Density

Surface Density

(39)

34 11297.174 5 2259.435 36.229 .000 2993.522 48 62.365 14290.696 53 5254.371 5 1050.874 12.354 .000 4083.144 48 85.066 9337.515 53 Between Groups Within Groups Total Between Groups Within Groups Total SURFACE DENSITY Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. ANOVA

(40)

35

-(I) GROUP (J) GROUP

M e a n Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. M6 B6 -18.3556* 3.723 .000 BE6 -32.9111* 3.723 .000 M12 -30.3111* 3.723 .000 B12 -33.2667* 3.723 .000 BE12 -46.1444* 3.723 .000 B6 M6 18.3556* 3.723 .000 BE6 -14.5556* 3.723 .004 M12 -11.9556* 3.723 .027 B12 -14.9111* 3.723 .003 BE12 -27.7889* 3.723 .000 BE6 M6 32.9111* 3.723 .000 B6 14.5556* 3.723 .004 M12 2.6000 3.723 .981 B12 -.3556 3.723 1.000 BE12 -13.2333* 3.723 .011 M12 M6 30.3111* 3.723 .000 B6 11.9556* 3.723 .027 BE6 -2.6000 3.723 .981 B12 -2.9556 3.723 .967 BE12 -15.8333* 3.723 .001 B12 M6 33.2667* 3.723 .000 B6 14.9111* 3.723 .003 BE6 .3556 3.723 1.000 M12 2.9556 3.723 .967 BE12 -12.8778* 3.723 .014 BE12 M6 46.1444* 3.723 .000 B6 27.7889* 3.723 .000 BE6 13.2333* 3.723 .011 M12 15.8333* 3.723 .001 B12 12.8778* 3.723 .014

(41)

36

-(I) GROUP (J) GROUP

M e a n Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Density M6 B6 -9.9667 4.348 .217 BE6 -24.0667* 4.348 .000 M12 -12.2333 4.348 .072 B12 -20.3222* 4.348 .000 BE12 -29.9111* 4.348 .000 B6 M6 9.9667 4.348 .217 BE6 -14.1000* 4.348 .025 M12 -2.2667 4.348 .995 B12 -10.3556 4.348 .183 BE12 -19.9444* 4.348 .000 BE6 M6 24.0667* 4.348 .000 B6 14.1000 4.348 .025 M12 11.8333 4.348 .089 B12 3.7444 4.348 .954 BE12 -5.8444 4.348 .759 M12 M6 12.2333 4.348 .072 B6 2.2667 4.348 .995 BE6 -11.8333 4.348 .089 B12 -8.0889 4.348 .438 BE12 -17.6778* 4.348 .002 B12 M6 20.3222* 4.348 .000 B6 10.3556 4.348 .183 BE6 -3.7444 4.348 .954 M12 8.0889 4.348 .438 BE12 -9.5889 4.348 .254 BE12 M6 29.9111* 4.348 .000 B6 19.9444* 4.348 .000 BE6 5.8444 4.348 .759 M12 17.6778* 4.348 .002 B12 9.5889 4.348 .254

(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)

56

-Key word: implant, osseointegration, surface treatment, bone density

contact surface, pure titanium, blasted, acid etched

참조

관련 문서

The purpose of this study is to clarify the effect of identification affirmation according to K-Pop star image on the desire of middle school students to participate

Methods to overcome insufficient bone due to poor bone quality, the pneumatization of a maxillary sinus and other anatomical limitations of implant placement

Measurement of proximal contact tightness between the left first molar and second molar(dental implant) in the mandible... Clinical dental anatomy, histology,

LIST OF TABLES... LIST

Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a two- dimentional comparative study examining the effects of implant

The aim of this study was to compare the effect on bone regeneration relative to maintenance period of PTFE membrane in rabbit calcarial defects.. Eight adult

This study is an analysis of distribution of patient who installed Endopore Ⓡ at maxilla in Chosun University Dental hospital and types of implant for about 4

Purpose: We investigated the impact of treatment on electroencephalogram (EEG) findings, and determined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs according to EEG findings