1. 단행본
가. 국내 문헌
김경안․유충, 이론과 실제: 재난대응론, 도서출판 반, 1998: 11 김열수, 21세기 국가위기관리체제론, 오름, 2005: 57
김태영외 2인 공저, 사회과학논문작성과 통계적 분석, 2003: 116-142.
김형렬, 정책결정론, 대영문화사, 1997: 401.
유 충, 재난관리론, 한성문화사, 2001: 35.
윤병준, 재난과 위기관리 해설, 한국학술정보, 2007: 59, 103.
이원희, 새열린행정학, 고시연구사, 2007: 365
이종수, 윤영진, 양영철 외 공저, 새행정학, 대영문화사, 2003 이재은 외 24인 공저, 재난관리론 , 대영문화사, 2006: 206, 225.
SPSS 12.0에 의한 조사방법 및 통계분석, 형설출판사, 2005: 15-151.
나. 외국 문헌
Arrow, Kenneth J. Information and Economic Behavior. Samuel H. Baker &
Catherine S . Elliott(eds), Readings in Public Sector Economics, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company. 1990: 242-252.
Heilbroner, Robert, & Thurow, Lester. Economics Explained : Everything You Need to Know About How the Economy Works and Where It's Going (revised and updated). NY: A Touchstone Book. 1994: 190.
Rubin, Claire B. Recovery from Disaster. Thomas E. Drabek & Gerard J.
Hoetmer. (eds.). Emergency Management : Principles and Practice for Local Government. Washington, DC: International City Management Association. 1991: 224-259.
Schneider, Saundra K. Flirting with Disaster : Public Management in Crisis Situations. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc. 1995: 18.
Waugh, William L. Jr. Emergency Management . Jay M. Shafritz. (editor in chief). International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 2. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1998: 749.
2. 연구 논문
가. 국내 문헌
강대훈, 재난관리영역에서의 행정조직간 경쟁에 대한 연구, 소방논집, 2002.
강 성 권 ․ 홍 미 영․ 김 형 빈 , “지방정부 소 방조직의 통 합 적 체 제구축 에 관한 연구”, 지방정부연구, 2003.
국가재난관리시스템구축 사례분석 TF, 참여정부 국가재난관리시스템 사례분석, 2007
김광수, 소방행정의 발전을 위한 재원확충방안, 1998.
김영규, Disaster Planning: Should Be Agent-Specific or Generic?, 지방행정연구, 1995: 201.
김영평, 현대사회와 위험의 문제, 한국행정연구, 1994: 14.
김태윤, “국가재해재난관리체계 구축방안”, 한국행정연구원 연구보고서, 2000:
37-38
남궁근, “재해관리 행정체계의 국가간 비교 연구 : 미국과 한국의 사례를 중심 으로”, 한국행정학보, 1995: 957-981
박승천, 민방위제도와 발전방향, 소방방재청, 2005
서귀포소방서, 소방안전체험의 Remodeling에 관한 연구, 2003
심재현, “선진국의 재난관리를 통해 본 우리나라의 재난관리 개선방안”, 위험관 리지 가을호, 1999.
이목훈, 소방조직의 독립성에 기초한 소방재원의 확충, 소방논집, 2002.
이상팔, 도시재난사고의 예방단계에서의 정부조직학습-삼풍백화점붕괴사고
사례를 중심으로, 한국행정학보, 1995
이용만, 지방자치단체의 소방재원 확충방안에 관한 연구, 제주대학교 행정대학원 석사학위 논문, 2004
이원희, 21세기 소방조직의 발전방향, 소방논집, 2001
임송태 외, 재난종합관리체제에 관한 연구, 한국지방행정연구원, 1996: 10.
정흥수, 합리적 방재체제의 구축을 위한 당면 과제, 지방행정연구, 1994
제주도소방재난관리본부, 재난안전관리 System 개선을 위한 소방행정 분야 직무 분석 결과 보고서‘. 2005
제주발전연구원, 소방관서 운영체계 개편을 위한 조직진단, 2006 한국지방행정연구원, 소방재원 확충방안, 1999.
나. 외국 문헌
Clary, Bruce B, The Evolution and Structure of Natural Hazard Policies.
Public Administration Review. 45(Special Issue, Jan.), 1985: 20-28.
Kasperson, Roger E. & K. David Pijawka. Societal Response to Hazards and Major Hazard Events: Comparing Natural and Technological Hazards.
Public Administration Review. 1985
Zimmerman, Rae. The Relationship of Emergency Management to Govern-mental Policies on Man-made Technological Disasters. Public Adminis-tration Review. 45(Special Issue), 1985: 29-39.
3. 기타 자료
미국 FEMA(연방재난관리청) 홈페이지(www.fema.gov/about/structure.shtm.
/ about/index.shtm) 防災行政硏究會. (平成 14年). 災害對策基本法. 50.
소방방재청, 민방위 30년사, 2006
소방방재청 재난연감, 2005
소방방재청 홈페이지(www.nema.go.kr/introduction/organization/team.jsp) 제주소방방재본부, 제11호 태풍 ‘나리’ 분석자료, 2007
제주소방서, 재난대응현장활동지침, 2007 제주특별자치도 조직진단 자료, 2007.
ABSTRACT
The Study on Reorganization of Disaster Management of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province
Yang, In-Seok
Department of Public Administration Graduate School of Public Administration Cheju National University
Supervised by Professor Yang, Young-Chul
Disaster may be divided into 2 kinds on the basis of kinds ; natural disasters and manmade disasters, and 4 phases (mitigation preparedness -response - recovery) on the basis of process.
That's why the question of unification or dispersion should naturally follow.
As we see the current structure, disasters are managed with the National Emergency Management Agency as the center at the national level, with Jeju Fire & Disaster Management Dept. as the center at Jeju province level, and with cities or fire stations dually at the first line level.
Several controversial points on the present structure were analyzed from laws, behavior observation, some documents, and the case study of typhoon 'nari'.
The system of disaster management in Jeju could be seen unitive. But it isn't synthetic in substance but coexistent. It is because disaster management is not being carried out on the basis of disaster process(funtion) but on the basis of disaster kinds.
And at the first line level, rational dispersion is not being accomplished.
Therefore the confusion of organization in charge of disaster management process causes contradiction of overlapping and lack in resources.
Several hypotheses were set up from the controversial points.
① The level of integrity in disaster kinds and that of integrity in disaster process are closely connected.
② All kinds of disasters should be managed unitively.
③ At the province planning level, synthetic management on the basis of disaster process in a bureau is desired.
④ At the first line level, rational dispersion on the basis of disaster process in disaster management is desired.
The results of examination from the survey roughly corresponded with the hypotheses, but the hypothesis on the first line level was slightly different from the result.
In spite of the result, all the hypotheses could be accepted because of the necessity of ration dispersion at the first line level, insignificant difference in the result of survey, etc.
In conclusion, the province should accomplish the synthetic management in a bureau on the basis of disaster process at the province planning level.
By the way, the current organization has been misunderstood as synthetic management, and is under disappearance crisis of the possibility in substantial integrity.
And at the first line level, I warily present the rational dispersion in several organizations on the basis of disaster process.
I propose 2 concrete schemes of them. One is more realistic because each department is charge of disaster mitigation phase, the other is related to the establishment of disaster mitigation station for the strengthening of disaster mitigation.