.
II. ·
1.
2.
3.
III.
1.
2.
3.
IV.
1.
2.
3.
V.
1.
2.
3.
VI.
1.
2.
3.
4. - VII.
* .
** .
: 2014. 10. 31. / : 2014. 11. 25. / : 2014. 11. 28.
.
20
. .
.
. .
. ,
.
60% .
.
.
2008 2014 10 1
.
.
.
80 20 .1)
1) (https://www.digitalbrain.go.kr/kor/view/statis/statis04_08_01.jsp?code=
DB01040801) . , 2012 203 ,
. 1995
. ,
.
, 55 45 .2)3)
. 1990
. 2007
( )
40%
.
2014
45.9% ( + ) ( ).
42.3% .
31 6 , 37 6 .
2) (http://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_seisaku/hakusyo/chihou/23data/23czb1-1-3.
html) , 21(2009) , 53.4%,
46.6% , ( :
2014. 07. 09).
3)
40 60
( , , , 2012, 30 ).
1 4)
* , .
2014 54 4 .
25.6%
19.0% .
1 5)
( +
) 47.7% . , ,
, 38.7% .
2 (2012 )6)
5) , http://lofin.mospa.go.kr/lofin_localtax/LocalTaxStat03.jsp.
6) , , , , 2012, 10 .
41.1% , 41.1%
26.8%, 7.7%, 7.0%
(2011 ).
39.3% , 19.0%,
17.3% , 44.6%,
42.3% .
60% .
60%
. , 2012 167 153
, , 103 724 61.7%
.7) .
. ,
.
,
.
.
11 .
. ,
.
.
. .
. 0.2-0.4%
(2012 ), 1.0-1.3% . ,
, 3 .
78 1
. (
) (
)
.8) , , .9)
1 ,
5 . .
1 1
2 100 50 .10)
< 3> 11)
8) 75 .
4,800 ,
,
( , , ,
2014, 615 ).
9) 76 1 .
10) 78 2 .
, 8 1
. 8 16 8 31 .12)
.13) 78 14)
. 7 1
( ) . ,
2
.15) 76 2
. 1 250 .16)
330 .17)
, 7 1
12) 79 .
13) 74 2 .
14) 78 ( ) 74 5 "
"
.
1. 2 1 2 ( .
) . ,
, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , ,
, .
2. 1 ( , ,
) 1
, .
15) 75 2 80 .
16) 81 1 .
17) 82 .
. 7 1 7 31
.
.18)
2014 1 1 ,
.
20 1
. ,
12 3 .19)
. (
) .20)
, 1
5 , 50
.21)
. 10
. .22)
18) 83 .
19) 78 2.
20) 75 3 76 3 .
21) 84 2 84 4.
2009
2010.1.1. .23)
,
.24)
2013
, ,
. 2014
, ,
, .25)
3 4
26) ,
.27) 6
.28) 2010
89 , 100 10
23) , , , 2014, 635 .
24) , , ( ) , 2014, 1082 .
25) , , , 2014, 635 .
26) 85 1 1 . 1
, ( 85
1 3 4 ).
27) 86 1 .
28) 89 1 1 .
, 2014 92 1 .
4
3 .29)
.30) 9
,
9 1
,
.31) 103 20 1
29) 85 .
- -
5. " "
.
6. " " .
. 32
. 32
(
( ) ( )
)
. 13 4 ( "
" )
7. " " (
) .
8. " "
( ) .
.
5
100
10 .
(surtax) ,
.32)
.
.
. (
) ( ) .33)
31) 89 1 2 .
32) , , ( ) , 2014, 1082 .
33) ( 1 ( ( )), 1 ( ( )), 2
( ( ), ( )), 43 ( ) 47 .
2013 1 789 ( ), 746 ( ), 184 ( )
1719 . , ( ) ( )
5 ( ,
.
.
. .
17.3% (2011 )
.34) 17.3% 1.4%
15.9% .
( , )
. ,
.
, .
39.3%(2011 )
, 42.3%
.35)
. , 39.3%
33.0% , 4.6% .
.36)
, , 2013, 32-33 ).
34) 25(2013) ,
43.8%, 56.2% . , 1.9%,
11.5% , 5% (
http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000250033.pdf( (
25 ) : 2014. 05. 19.).
35) , , , 2012, 65 .
.
, ( “ ” )
. ,
.
1,000 ,
3,000 .
.
,
4%,
6% .
.
, (
23 ) ( 292 ) ,
.
,
,
.
, .
.
6 37)
, 38)
.39)
,
. 5.0%,
12.3% .
37) , , , 2012, 86 .
38)
( ,
. 23 1 4 292
1 4 ).
. .
, .40)
.
1 , 2 , 3
5%(1 ), 4%(2 ), 5% 3%(3 ) .41)
.
. , ,
,
, .
,
42). .
40) 72 2 1 .
41) , , , ,
2012, 94 . 42)
.
7 43)
15(2003) 2004
.
44) , 2004
“ ” .
17.3% (2011 )
,
, 2/3
43) , , , 2012, 99 .
44)
. 60(1985) 38.6%
, 23(2011) 17.5%
(
(http://www.mof.go.jp/pri/publication/zaikin_geppo/hyou/g735/735.htm)
. 2004
, , ,
.
“ ,
” .45)
2003
, ,
46)
. 1
.
,
. .
.
( 72 15), ( 72
16) ( 72 17) ( )
( 72 18.
) ( 72 14).
( 72 19).
47),
45) ,
( , ,
, 2012, 103-104 ).
46) , 72 4 1 , 72 24 7 5 ,
2 12 ,
2 3 ( (
2 9 2 ) )
( ) .
(
) .
2 26(2014) 48)
47) 72 12 1 .
.
. . 2008 , 2014
. . ,
.
. .
( 1
) , .
.
.49)
20(2008) ,
.50)
49) ૠ ૠ ૠ2013, 534 .
50) ૠ ૠ ૠ
ૠ2013.11.ૠ27 .
20(2008) ( 20
25 ) ,
. ,
( 2 ) ,
( 3 9 )
. ,
( 10 12 ).
( 32 ) .
, 1
, . .
, ,
.
.51) 24(2012) 9
. ( )
( , ) ,
.52)
51) ૠ ૠ
No. 349.ૠ ૠ2014. 2.ૠ39 .
52) ૠ ૠ
. .
8 53)
5.0%(6.0%) 3.2%(4.2%) 1.8%
12.3%(14.7%) 9.7%(12.1%) 2.6%
* ( ) :
1/3 .
,
.
53) ૠ 26 ૡ
3 54)
26(2014) 3 31 , 10
1 . 1
, ,
,
.55) 2
. 4
, (
)
.56) 5
, .57)
54) ૠ ૠ990 .
55) ( ) ૠ
ૠ ૠ ૠ ૠ
ૡ
56) ( ) (
ૡ) ૠ ૠ ૡ
6
. 8
, 1
16 18
, 2 19
.58) 2
, 9 1
, 2
.59)
, 10 , 1
100 4.4
, 4.4%60) ,
2
67 1 81 3 1
.61)
ૠ ૠ ૡ
58) ( ) ૠ
ૡ ૠ
ૡ
59) ૠ
ૡ
ૠ ૡ
60) 4.4% < 8>
(1.8%) (2.6%) .
61) ( ) ૠ
ૡ
ૠ
ૠ
ૠ ૡ
.
.
. .
2008 2014
.
.
, .
. .62)
. ,
.
,
62)
.
.
.
, .
. 2008
, 2014
. ,
.
.
.
.
.
.63) 2004
63) , , , 2012, 101-102 .
.
,
.
.
.
80 20 , 55
45 .
, .
.
.
. ,
2008 , 2014
. .
,
. ,
.
. ,
, .
, ,
,
.
, , ( ) , 2014.
, , , 2014.
, 2013 .
, , , 2014.
, , , 2012.
, , ,
2002.
, , , 24
1 , , 2013.
, ,
, 2013.
, ,
, 2013.
, , ,
2012.
, , , 2012.
, , 11
2 , , 2011.
, , 12 4 ,
, 2012.
ૠ ૠ ૠ2013.
ૠ ૠ ૠ2013.
· ૠ ૠ ૠ1996.
Susanne Baer, in:Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem/Eberhard Schmidt-Assmann, Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts Band : Methoben, Maßstäbe, Aufgaben, Organisation, C.H.Beck.
ૠ ૠ
No. 349.ૠ ૠ2014. 2.
ૠ ૠ ૠ
ૠ2013.11.
ૠ ૠ ૠ
ૠ2013.11.
ૠ 26 ૠ ૠ ૠ
2014.1.
ૠ 26 ૠ ૠ
ૠ2014.1.
< >
20 .
.
, .
,
.
,
. 80 20
, 20% 60%
.
2014
. ,
,
.
.
55 45 .
2014.10.1.
.
,
.
.
Journal of Legislation Research / 47th Issue
:
Introduction and Implication of Local Corporation Tax of Japan
Lee, Dong-Sik*, Hwang, Heon-Sun**64)
In korea, the local self governing has already been doing over 20years. During that time, it did not happen only positive aspects. Many problems arose in the local governing system.
To make genuine local self governing, independence of local finance is most important. It is 80 to 20 ratio in national tax and local tax in Korea. And the 60% of the 20% is in capital area even.
In this situation, local income tax is become an independent tax from surtax.
But the condition of local governments except capital area will worsen because of narrow based in capital area.
In this sense, this thesis refer to Japan because Japan is similar to Korea in social condition. The ratio of national tax and local tax in Japan was similar to Korea. But now it is 55 to 45 ratio in national tax and local tax. So, the way to achieve the ratio like present condition is worthy of consider. For a spread of a local grant tax, Japan used the way to make a source of revenue from a portion of resident tax of corporate. And then it is distributed to the local governments which are weak in financial power. Even though that way is not perfect one to expand local finances, it will gain a different perspective to expand local finances.
It is necessary to not only construction method of local tax system for symbiotic relationship with other local governments but also an appropriate expansion of authority of taxation for spread of a source of revenue in local governments.
* Prof. Dr, Law School, Kyungpook National University
