Naval Architecture & Oce an En gin ee ring
@ SDAL Advanced Ship Design Automation Lab.
http://asdal.snu.ac.kr Seoul
National Univ.
Computer Aided Ship Design
Part.3 Grillage Analysis of Midship Cargo Hold
2009 Fall
Prof. Kyu-Yeul Lee
Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering,
Seoul National University of College of Engineering
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Application Bar
Beam
Shaft
Summary
Element Behavior
Tension
Bending
Torsion
Midship Cargo Hold
2 2
( ) ( ) 0 d u x
EA f x
dx
4 4
( ) ( ) 0 EI w x f x
x
Structure
•Superposition of Stiffness Matrix
•Coordinates Transformation
Truss
Frame
Grillage
2 2
( ) x ( ) 0
GJ f x
x
Beam Theory : Sign Convention, Deflection of Beam
Elasticity : Displacement, Strain, Stress, Force Equilibrium, Compatibility, Constitutive Equation :
A Sectional Area :
: E I
Young’s Modulus Moment of Inertia
:
G Shear Modulus
:
J Polar Moment of Inertia
:
l Length
Differential Equation
Mx F , where x 0
Variational Method
2
0
( ) 0
2
l
EA du
f u dx
dx
2 2
0 2
( ) 0
2
l
EA d w
f w dx
dx
2
0
( ) 0
2
l
GJ d
f dx dx
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
u f
EA
u f
l
0 1
( )
u x a a x
1 1
2 2
1 1 3
2 2
2 2
2 2
6 3 6 3
3 2 3
2
6 3 6 3
3 3 2
f u
l l
M
l l l l
EI
u
l l f
l
l l l l M
2 3
0 1 2 3
( )
w x b b x b x b x
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1 GJ M
l M
0 1
( ) x c c x
Kd F
Finite Element Method
•Discretization
•Approximation
Grillage Modeling
•Equivalent Force & Moment
•3D 2D
•Boundary condition
Engineering Concept !
Solution
•programming
•visulaization :
u
Vertical Displacement
:
G Shear Modulus
: Angle of Twist
: w
Axial Displacement
2/37
Chapter 2. Element : Beam
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Differential Eqn.
x
ε i
① strain at in x-direction : y
x , x
σ i ε i , θ k y , y j E
ds
d ds d 1
ds
( y d ) d d y
ds y ds
, : initial length
, :elongated length ds
y d
ds
x y
neutral
surface y
dx
d
ds
σ x
* neutral surface : Longitudinal lines on the lower part of the beam are elongated, whereas those on the upper part are shortened. Thus the lower part of the beam is in tension and the upper part is in
compression. Somewhere between the top and bottom of the beam is a surface in which longitudinal lines do not change in length. This surface is called neutral surface
4/37
Element : Beam - Differential Eqn.
x
ε i
x ,
E where y
σ i i
( )
x x
d F σ dA i dA dA i
③ force acting on in x-direction : dA
④ moment about z-axis :
2
( ) ( y ) y
d d y E dA E dA
M y F j i k
② stress at in x-direction : y
① strain at in x-direction : y
x , x
σ i ε i , θ k y , y j E
ds
d ds d 1
ds
x
E y
σ i i d E y dA
F i
( y d ) d d y
ds y ds
, : initial length
, :elongated length ds
y d
neutral
surface y
dx
d
ds ds
x y
σ x
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Differential Eqn.
ds
d ds d 1
ds
① strain at in x-direction :
x
ε i
x , x
σ i ε i
④ moment about z-axis :
2
( ) ( y ) y
d d y E dA E dA
M y F j i k
y
, θ k y , y j
( y d ) d d
ds y ds
E
② stress at in x-direction : y x y
E
σ i i
③ force acting on in x-direction : dA d F E y dA i
2
A A
d E y dA
M M k
⑤ assume
dx dx dy
ds , tan
2 2
d d y
ds dx
2 2
d d dy d dy d y
ds ds dx dx dx dx
A y dA
I 2
Define then, EI , EI
M
M k EI
M k
, d : initial length, y d :elongated length
2
, d y 2
M EI
dx
2 2
EI d y
dx
M k
EI d ds
M k
neutral
surface y
dx
d
ds ds
x y
σ x
6/37
Element : Beam - Differential Eqn.
1 d
ds
① strain at in x-direction :
x
ε i
x , x
σ i ε i
④ moment about z-axis :
2
( ) ( y ) y
d d y E dA E dA
M y F j i k
y
, θ k y , y j
( y d ) d d
ds y ds
E
② stress at in x-direction : y x y
E
σ i i
③ force acting on in x-direction : dA d F E y dA i
2
A A
d E y dA
M M k
⑤ assume
dx dx dy
ds , tan
2 2
d d y
ds dx
, 2
I A y dA
EI
k
, d : initial length, y d :elongated length
2 2
EI d y
dx
M k
x y
( ) f x
neutral
surface y
dx
d
ds ds
x y
σ x
EI d
EI ds
M k k
⑥ relationships between loads, shear forces, and bending moments
1 , 2 V , 1 , 2 M
V V dx M M dx
x x
V j V j M k M k
•force equilibrium
1 2 ( ) 0
y x
F V V f
1 1 1
1
( ) 0
( ) 0
V V V dx f x dx
x
V V V dx f x dx
j j j
j dV ( )
f x
2
, d y 2
M EI
dx
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Differential Eqn.
1 d
ds
① strain at in x-direction :
x
ε i
x , x
σ i ε i
④ moment about z-axis :
2
( ) ( y ) y
d d y E dA E dA
M y F j i k
y
, θ k y , y j
( y d ) d d
ds y ds
E
② stress at in x-direction : y x y
E
σ i i
③ force acting on in x-direction : dA d F E y dA i
2
A A
d E y dA
M M k
⑤ assume
dx dx dy
ds , tan
2 2
d d y
ds dx
, 2
I A y dA
EI
k
, d : initial length, y d :elongated length
x y
( ) f x
neutral
surface y
dx
d
ds ds
x y
σ x
⑥ relationships between loads, shear forces, and bending moments
1 , 2 V , 1 , 2 M
V V dx M M dx
x x
V j V j M k M k
•force equilibrium dV ( )
dx f x
dM ( ) dx V x
•moment equilibrium 1 2 2
1 ( ) 0
z d 2 d x dx
M M M x V x f
1 ( ) 0
2
M V
M M dx dx V dx dx f x dx
x x
k k i j i j
2 2
EI d y
dx
M k
EI d
EI ds
M k k
2
, d y 2
M EI
dx
8/37
Element : Beam - Differential Eqn.
1 d
ds
① strain at in x-direction :
x
ε i
x , x
σ i ε i
④ moment about z-axis :
2
( ) ( y ) y
d d y E dA E dA
M y F j i k
y
, θ k y , y j
( y d ) d d
ds y ds
E
② stress at in x-direction : y x y
E
σ i i
③ force acting on in x-direction : dA d F E y dA i
2
A A
d E y dA
M M k
⑤ assume
dx dx dy
ds , tan
2 2
d d y
ds dx
, 2
I A y dA
EI
k
, d : initial length, y d :elongated length
x y
( ) f x
neutral
surface y
dx
d
ds ds
x y
σ x
⑥ relationships between loads, shear forces, and bending moments
1 , 2 V , 1 , 2 M
V V dx M M dx
x x
V j V j M k M k
•force equilibrium dV ( )
dx f x dM ( )
dx V x
•moment equilibrium
2 2
EI d y
dx
M k
EI d
EI ds
M k k
2
, d y 2
M EI
dx
2 2
d y M
dx EI d y
331 dM 1 V x ( )
dx EI dx EI
44
1 1
d y dV ( )
dx EI dx EI f x
4
d y ( )
EI f x
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Variational Method
Differential Equation
Boundary condition
4
4 ( ) 0
EI d v f x
dx
4
0 l d v 4 0
EI f v dx
dx
multiply by and integrate u
4 0 4
l d v
EI v f v dx
dx
L.H.S:
3 3
3 0 3 0
0 l
l d v l
d v d v
EI v EI dx f v dx
dx dx dx
3
0 3 0
l d v d v l
EI dx f v dx
dx dx
2 2 2
2 0 2 2 0
0 l
l l
d v d v d v d v
EI EI dx f v dx
dx dx dx dx
integration by part
d d
v v
dx dx
1 2
v v 2 v
f v fv
( ) ( )
b b
a h x dx a h x dx
operation
0
2 2
2 2
0
0 , 0
, 0, 0
x x l
x x l
v v
d v d v
EI EI
dx dx
2 2
2 2
0 0
l d v d v l
EI dx f v dx
dx dx
2 2 2 2
2 2 2
1 2
v v v
x x x
10/37
Element : Beam - Variational Method
Differential Equation
Boundary Condition
4
4 ( ) 0
EI d v f x
dx
4
0 l d v 4 0
EI f v dx
dx
multiply by and integrate u
4 0 4
l d v
EI v f v dx
dx
L.H.S:
integration by part
d d
v v
dx dx
1 2
v v 2 v
f v fv
2 2 2 2
2 2 2
1 2
v v v
x x x
( ) ( )
b b
h x dx h x dx
operation
0
2 2
2 2
0
0 , 0
, 0, 0
x x l
x x l
v v
d v d v
EI EI
dx dx
2 2
2 2
0 0
l d v d v l
EI dx f v dx
dx dx
2 2
2 2
0 0
1 2
l d v d v l
EI dx fv dx
dx dx
2
0 2 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
Variational Method
x
( )
l v x
v 1 v x ( ) v 2
1 2
2 3
0 1 2 3
( )
v x c c x c x c x
assume: , (0) v v 1 , v l ( ) v 2
1 2
, dv (0) , dv ( )
dx dx l
discretization
1 element , 2 nodes finite element method
2
2 0 2 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
12/37
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
2 3
0 1 2 3 2
( )
v l c c l c l c l v (0) 0
v c
0 1
c v
2 2 1 2 1 2
3 1
2
c v v
l l
Variational Method
v 1 v x ( ) v 2
1 2 2 2 2
0 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
2 3
0 1 2 3
( )
v x c c x c x c x
assume: , (0) v v 1 , v l ( ) v 2
1 2
, dv (0) , dv ( )
dx dx l
(0) 1
dv c
dx
2
1 2 3 2
( ) 2 3
dv l c c l c l
dx
1 1
c 3 3 1 2 2 1 2
2 1
c v v
l l
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
0 1
c v , c 2 3 2 v 1 v 2 1 2 1 2
l l
Variational Method
v 1 v x ( ) v 2
1 2 2 2 2
0 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
2 3
0 1 2 3
( )
v x c c x c x c x
assume: , (0) v v 1 , v l ( ) v 2
1 2
, dv (0) , dv ( )
dx dx l
1 1
, c
3 3 1 2 2 1 2
2 1
c v v
l l
2 3
1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 2
3 1 2 1
( ) 2
v x v x v v x v v x
l l l l
3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2
1 1 2 2
3 3 3 3
1 1 1 1
( ) (2 3 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 3 ) ( )
or v x x x l l v x l x l xl x x l v x l x l
l l l l
14/37
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
1 1
1 2 3 4
2 2
( )
v v x N N N N
v
Variational Method
v 1 v x ( ) v 2
1 2 2 2 2
0 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2
1 1 2 2
3 3 3 3
1 1 1 1
( ) (2 3 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 3 ) ( )
v x x x l l v x l x l xl x x l v x l x l
l l l l
3 2 3
1 3
1 (2 3 )
N x x l l
l
3 2 2 3
2 3
1 ( 2 )
N x l x l xl
l
3 2
3 3
1 ( 2 3 )
N x x l
l
3 2 2
4 3
1 ( )
N x l x l
l
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
1 2
1
1 2 3 4
2
2 2
( )
v d v x
B B B B dx v
v x ( ) Nd ,
2 2
( ) d v x
dx B d
1 1
1 2 3 4
2 2
( )
v v x N N N N
v
differentiation with respect to twice x
Variational Method
v 1 v x ( ) v 2
1 2 2 2 2
0 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2
1 1 2 2
3 3 3 3
1 1 1 1
( ) (2 3 ) ( 2 ) ( 2 3 ) ( )
v x x x l l v x l x l xl x x l v x l x l
l l l l
1 3
1 (12 6 )
B x l
l 2 3 2
1 (6 4 )
B xl l
l
3 3
1 ( 12 6 )
B x l
l 4 1 3 2
(6 2 )
B xl l
l
3 2 3
1 3
1 (2 3 )
N x x l l
l 2 3 3 2 2 3
1 ( 2 )
N x l x l xl
l
3 2
3 3
1 ( 2 3 )
N x x l
l 3 2 2
4 3
1 ( )
N x l x l
l
16/37
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
( )
v x N d
2 2
( ) d v x
dx B d
2 2
0 2 ( ) 0
2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
0 0 ( ) 0
2
l T T l
EI dx f dx
d B B d Nd
derivation
1 1
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
2 2
, ,
v
where N N N N B B B B
v
N B d
Variational Method v 1 v x ( ) v 2
1
22
2 0 2 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
2 2
3 3 3 3
1 1 1 1
(12 x 6 ) l (6 xl 4 ) l ( 12 x 6 ) l (6 xl 2 ) l
l l l l
T
B B
3
2 3
3
2 3
1 (12 6 )
1 (6 4 )
1 ( 12 6 )
1 (6 2 ) x l l
xl l l
x l l
xl l
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
(derivation)
2 2
0 2 ( )
2
l EA d v
fv dx
dx
T T
0 0 ( )
2
l l
T T
EI dx f dx
d B Bd d N
T T T
0 0
1 ( )
2
l l
EI T dx f dx
d B B d d N
T T
1
2
d Kd d F
T T
d Kd d F
T
d Kd F
0
l T
EI dx
K B B
T T T
1 1
2 2
d Kd d K d d F
1 1 2 2
[ ] T
d v v
T T T
1 1
2 2
d Kd d Kd d F d T Kd d K d T
T
K K
symmetry
0 0 ( )
2
l l
T T
EI dx f dx
d B B d N d
T T T:
f Nd Nd f d N f Nd scalar
2 2
3
2 2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l
l l l l
EI
l l
l
l l l l
T
0 l ( f dx )
F N
18/37
(derivation)
2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(12 6 ) (12 6 ) (12 6 ) (6 4 ) (12 6 ) ( 12 6 ) (12 6 ) (6 2 )
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(6 4 ) (12 6 ) (6 4 ) (6 4 ) (6 4 ) ( 12 6 ) (6 4 ) (6 2 )
1 ( 12 6
x l x l x l xl l x l x l x l xl l
l l l l l l l l
xl l x l xl l xl l xl l x l xl l xl l
l l l l l l l l
EI
x l
l
3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 22 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
) (12 6 ) ( 12 6 ) (6 4 ) ( 12 6 ) ( 12 6 ) ( 12 6 ) (6 2 )
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(6 2 ) (12 6 ) (6 2 ) (6 4 ) (6 2 ) ( 12 6 ) (6 2 ) (6 2 )
x l x l xl l x l x l x l xl l
l l l l l l l
xl l x l xl l xl l xl l x l xl l xl l
l l l l l l l l
0
l
dx
2 2
3
2 2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l
l l l l
EI
l l
l
l l l l
2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3
6 6 6 6
2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4
6 6 6 6
2 2
6 6
1 1 1 1
(144 144 36 ) (72 84 24 ) ( 144 144 36 ) (72 60 12 )
1 1 1 1
(72 84 24 ) (36 48 16 ) ( 72 84 24 ) (36 36 8 )
1 1
( 144 144 36 ) (
x xl l x l xl l x xl l x l xl l
l l l l
x l xl l x l xl l x l xl l x l xl l
l l l l
EI
x xl l
l l
0 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3
6 6
2 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4
6 6 6 3
1 1
72 84 24 ) (144 144 36 ) ( 72 60 12 )
1 1 1 1
(72 60 12 ) (36 36 8 ) ( 72 60 12 ) (36 24 4 )
l
dx
x l xl l x xl l x l xl l
l l
x l xl l x l xl l x l xl l x l xl l
l l l l
0
l T
EI dx
K B B
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
d T Kd F 0
-Chapter 2. Element : Beam
T
, F 0 l ( N f dx )
Kd F
( )
v x N d
2 2
( ) d v x
dx B d
2 2
0 2 ( ) 0
2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
0 0 ( ) 0
2
l T T l
EI dx f dx
d B B d Nd
derivation
1 1
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
2 2
, ,
v
where N N N N B B B B
v
N B d
Variational Method v 1 v x ( ) v 2
1
22
2 0 2 2
l EI d v
fv dx
dx
2 2
3
2 2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
, 12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l
l l l l
where EI
l l
l
l l l l
K
20/37
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
1
2 2
1 3
2
2 2
2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l v
l l l l
EI
l l v
l
l l l l
F T
, F 0 l ( N f dx )
Kd F
constant external force per unit length
equivalent nodal forces
equivalent nodal forces
2 3
0 1 2 3
( )
v x c c x c x c x
assume:
1 2
1 2
, (0) , ( ) , (0) , ( )
v v v l v
v v l
T 0 l ( f dx )
N
3 2 3
3
3 2 2 3
3
0 3 2
3
3 2 2
3
1 (2 3 )
1 ( 2 )
1 ( 2 3 )
1 ( )
l
x x l l l
x l x l xl
l f dx
x x l l
x l x l l
4
3 3
4 2
3 2 3
3 4
3
4 3
2
0
2 2
1 4 3 2
2
4 3
l
x x l xl
x x
l x l l
l x f
x l
x x
l l
1 1 2
2
f m
f m
F
v 1
v 2
( ) v x
1
2 fl 1
2 fl
2 2
0
2
2 lEI d v
fv dx
dx
Variational Method
v 1 v
2( ) v x
1
2x
( )
l v x
x
( ) v x
( ) :
f x f const
2
2
2 12
2 12
l f
l f
l f
l f
1
212 fl 1
212 fl
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
constant external force per unit length
equivalent nodal forces
boundary condition equivalent nodal forces free body diagram
2 f l
2
2
0
12 0
12 l f
l f
2
2
2 2 12 0
2 2
0 12
l f l f l f
l l
f f
l f
F
Variational Method
Kd F
2 3
0 1 2 3
( )
v x c c x c x c x
assume:
1 2
1 2
, (0) , ( ) , (0) , ( )
v v v l v
v v l
v 1 v x ( ) v
2
1
2x
( )
l v x
v 1
v 2
( ) v x
1
0
f
1
212 fl 1
212 fl
x
( ) v x
( ) :
f x f const
v 1
v 2
( ) v x
1
2 fl 1
2 fl 1
212 fl 1
212 fl
2
0
f
x
( ) v x
( ) :
f x f const
x
( ) v x
( ) :
f x f const
2 f l
1
2 2
1 3
2
2 2
2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l v
l l l l
EI
l l v
l
l l l l
F
T, F
0l( N f dx )
1 1 2
2
f m
f m
F
2
2
2 12
2 12
l f
l f
l f
l f
2
2 2
1 3
2 2 2
2
0 0
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2 12
12 6 12 6 0 0
6 2 6 4
l l l
l l l l f
EI
l l
l
l l l l l
f
2 2
0
2
2 lEI d v
fv dx
dx
22/37
Element : Beam - Finite Element Method
equivalent nodal forces
Variational Method
v 1
v 2
( ) v x
1
0
f
1
212 fl 1
212 fl
2
0
f
x
( ) v x
( ) :
f x f const
2
2 2
1 3
2 2 2
2
0 0
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2 12
12 6 12 6 0 0
6 2 6 4
12
l l l
l l l l f
EI
l l
l
l l l l l
f
Kd F
given find
3 3
1
0,
1,
20,
224 24
fl fl
v v
EI EI
, 0 x l
displacement given : x
find : v x ( )
3 2 2 3 3 2 2
1 3 2
( ) ( 2 ) 1 ( )
24
v x f x l x l xl x l x l
EI l
( ) (2 2 2 3 )
24
v x f x l xl
EI
2 2
0
2
2 lEI d v
fv dx
dx
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Galerkin’s Residual Method
V
R dV
1 1
1 2 3 4
2 2
,
v
where N N N N
v
N d
Differential Equation
4 4
( ) 0
d v x
EI f
dx
( )
u x N d
test function since it is
approximated solution
4 4
( ) d v x
EA f
dx 0 R residual
Thus substituting the approximated solution into the differential equation results in a residual over the whole region of the problem as follows
In the residual method, we require that a weighted value of the residual be a minimum over the whole region. The weighting functions allow the weighted integral of residuals to go to zero
0
V
R W dV
weighting function or
the basis functions are chosen to play the role of the weighting functions W
Galerkin Method
N i
0 , ( 1, 2)
i V
R N dV i
1
.)
0( ) 0
ref u v uv xv dx
basis function
24/37
Element : Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
the test functions are chosen to play the role of the weighting functions W
Galerkin Method
N
i0 , ( 1, 2)
i V
R N dV i
weighting function
residual (test function used) N
Differential Equation
4 4
( ) 0
d v x
EI f
dx
4 0 4
( ) 0 , ( 1, 2,3, 4)
l
i
d v x
EI f N dx i
dx
Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
integration by parts
3 3
3 0 3 0
0
0 ,( 1, 2,3, 4)
l
l l
i
i i
d v d v dN
N EI EI dx f N dx i
dx dx dx
2 2 3 2
2 2 3 2
0 0
0
0 ,( 1, 2,3, 4)
l
l l
i i
i i
d N d v d v dN d v
EI dx EI N f N dx i
dx dx dx dx dx
1
.)
0( ) 0
ref u v uv xv dx
, ( )
where v x Nd
3 2 3
1 3
1 (2 3 )
N x x l l
l
3 2 2 3
2 3
1 ( 2 )
N x l x l xl
l
3 2
3 3
1 ( 2 3 )
N x x l
l
3 2 2
4 3
1 ( )
N x l x l
l
integration by parts again
2
0 2 0
0
0 , ( 1, 2,3, 4)
l
l l
i i
i i
d N dN
EI dx EI N V m f N dx i
dx dx
B d
3 2
3 ( ), 2 ( )
d v d v
V x m x
dx dx
Recall,
0 0
0
0
T l
l l
T d T T
EI dx EI m V f dx
dx
B B d N N N
In matrix form,
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
the test functions are chosen to play the role of the weighting functions W
Galerkin Method
N
i0 , ( 1, 2)
i V
R N dV i
weighting function
residual (test function used) N
Differential Equation
4 4
( ) 0
d v x
EI f
dx
4 0 4
( ) 0 ,( 1, 2)
l
i
d v x
EI f N dx i
dx
Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
integration by parts
1
.)
0( ) 0
ref u v uv xv dx
, ( )
where v x Nd
3 2 3
1 3
1 (2 3 )
N x x l l
l
3 2 2 3
2 3
1 ( 2 )
N x l x l xl
l
3 2
3 3
1 ( 2 3 )
N x x l
l
3 2 2
4 3
1 ( )
N x l x l
l
2 2
3
2 2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l
l l l l
EI
l l
l
l l l l
0
l T
EI dx
K B B
2 2 2 3 2 2 2
3
( ) 1
6 6 3 4 6 6 3 2
d x
x xl x l xl l x xl x l xl
dx l
N
3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2
3
( ) x 1 2 x 3 x l l x l 2 x l xl 2 x 3 x l x l x l
l
N
(0) 1 0 0 0 N
, ( ) 0 0 0 1
x l
d x dx
N
0
, ( ) 0 1 0 0
x
d x
dx N
, ( ) N l 0 0 1 0
0 0
0
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (0) (0) (0) (0)
T l T
l l
T T T T
d d d
EI m V f dx m l l V l l m V f dx
dx dx dx
N N N N N N N N
R.H.S
0 0
0
0
T l
l l
T d T T
EI dx EI m V f dx
dx
B B d N N N
K
26/37
Element : Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
the test functions are chosen to play the role of the weighting functions W
Galerkin Method
N
i0 , ( 1, 2)
i V
R N dV i
weighting function
residual (test function used) N
Differential Equation
4 4
( ) 0
d v x
EI f
dx
4 0 4
( ) 0 ,( 1, 2)
l
i
d v x
EI f N dx i
dx
Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
integration by parts
1
.)
0( ) 0
ref u v uv xv dx
, ( )
where v x Nd
3 2 3
1 3
1 (2 3 )
N x x l l
l
3 2 2 3
2 3
1 ( 2 )
N x l x l xl
l
3 2
3 3
1 ( 2 3 )
N x x l
l
3 2 2
4 3
1 ( )
N x l x l
l
0 0
0
l l l
T d
EI dx EI m V f dx
dx
B B d N N N
2 2
3
2 2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l
l l l l
EI
l l
l
l l l l
0
l T
EI dx
K B B
R.H.S
0 0
0
2
2
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (0) (0) (0) (0)
2
0 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 12
( ) ( ) (0) (0)
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 2
12
T l T
l l
T T T T
d d d
EI m V f dx m l l V l l m V f dx
dx dx dx
l f
l f
m l V l m V
l f
l f
N N N
N N N N N
2
2
(0) 2 (0) 12 ( ) 2 ( ) 12
V l f
m l f
V l l f
m l l f
Kd F
3 2 212 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
, 12 6 12 6
l l
l l l l
where EI
l l
l
K
K
F
(0) 1 0 0 0 N
, ( ) 0 0 0 1
x l
d x
dx
N
0
, ( ) 0 1 0 0
x
d x dx
N
, ( ) N l 0 0 1 0
2
(0) 2 (0) 12 ,
V l f
m l f
l
F
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
the test functions are chosen to play the role of the weighting functions W
Galerkin Method
N
i0 , ( 1, 2)
i V
R N dV i
weighting function
residual (test function used) N
Differential Equation
4 4
( ) 0
d v x
EI f
dx
4 0 4
( ) 0 ,( 1, 2)
l
i
d v x
EI f N dx i
dx
1
.)
0( ) 0
ref u v uv xv dx
, ( )
where v x Nd
Beam - Galerkin’s Residual Method
For simple support beam,
x
( ) v x
( ) :
f x f const
(0) , (0) 0, ( ) , ( ) 0
2 2
l l
V f m V l f m l 2
1 2 3 4
2
0
[ ] 12
0
12
T
l f f f f f
l f
F
Kd F
3 2 22 2
12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2
, 12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
l l
l l l l
where EI
l l
l
l l l l
K , F [ f f 1 2 f 3 f 4 ] T
2
1 2
2
3 4
(0) , (0)
2 12
( ) , ( )
2 12
l l
f V f f m f
l l
f V l f f m l f
recall
m
1m
228/37
Element : Beam - Potential Energy Approach
the principle of minimum potential energy
Of all the geometrically possible shapes that a body can assume,
the true one, corresponding to the safisfaction of stable equilibrium of the body, is identified by a minimum value of the total potential energy
the total potential energy Π is defined as the
sum of the internal strain energy Π in and the potential energy of the external forces Π ext
in ext
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Potential Energy Approach
the total potential energy Π is defined as the
sum of the internal strain energy Π in and the potential energy of the external forces Π ext
in ext
1
in in 2 x x
V V
d dV
the strain energy for one-dimensional stress.
x
x
Linear-elastic
(Hooke’s law)material
x E x
0
x
in x
d d dxdydz
d x
0 x
0
x
x x
E d dxdydz
1 2 E x 2 d x dxdydz
1
2 x dxdydz
To evaluate the strain energy for a bar,
we consider only the work done by the internal forces during deformation.
30/37
Element : Beam - Potential Energy Approach
the total potential energy Π is defined as the
sum of the internal strain energy Π in and the potential energy of the external forces Π ext
in ext
The potential energy of the external forces, being opposite in sign from the extenal work expression because the potential energy of external forces is lost when the work is done by the external forces, is given by
1
2 2
1 1
ext y s iy i i i
i i
S
T v dS f v m
b v
X
body forces typically from the self-weight of the bar (in units of force per unit volume) moving through displacement function
v s
surface loading or traction typically from distributed loading acting along the surface of the element (in units of force per unit surface area) moving through displacements
where are the displacements occurring over surface T y
v s
S
1nodal concentrated force moving through nodal displacements f iy v i
l
f 1y m 2
T y
x ,
y v
2 y
f
m 1
2009 Fall, Computer Aided Ship Design, Part 3. Grillage 02-Beam Element
@ SDAL
Seoul National
Element : Beam - Potential Energy Approach
the principle of minimum potential energy
Of all the geometrically possible shapes that a body can assume,
the true one, corresponding to the safisfaction of stable equilibrium of the body, is identified by a minimum value of the total potential energy
the total potential energy Π is defined as the sum of the internal strain energy Π
inand the potential energy of the external forces Π
extin ext
in1 2
V
x xdV
1. Formulate an expression for the total potential energy.
2. Assume the displacement pattern to vary with a finite set of undetermined parameters (here these are the nodal displacements ), which are substituted into the expression for total potential energy.
3. Obtain a set of simultaneous equations minimizing the total potential energy with respect to these nodal parameters. These resulting equations represent the element equations.
Apply the following steps when using the principle of minimum potential energy to derive the finite element equations.
v i
1
2 2
1 1
,
ext y s iy i i ii i
S
T v dS f v m
32/37
l
f
1ym
2T
yx ,
y v
2y
f m
1Element : Beam - Potential Energy Approach
the principle of minimum potential energy
Of all the geometrically possible shapes that a body can assume,
the true one, corresponding to the safisfaction of stable equilibrium of the body, is identified by a minimum value of the total potential energy
the total potential energy Π is defined as the sum of the internal strain energy Π
inand the potential energy of the external forces Π
extin ext
in1 2
V
x xdV
Apply the following steps when using the principle of minimum potential energy to derive the finite element equations.
assume that there is no surface traction and body force and the sectional area is constant A
1
2 2
1 1
,
ext y s iy i i ii i
S
T v dS f v m
dV dAdx dS bdx
1
2 2
1 1
2 2
0 1 1
1 2 1 2
in ext
x x y s iy i i i
i i
V S
l
x x y s iy i i i
i i
dV T v dS f v m
dAdx bT v dx f v m
The differential volume for the beam element
Width of beam
, : b
The differential area over which the surface loading acts is