가
.
모든 특징(
제목,
초록, Mesh,
출판유형)
조합: TAMP (1) SVM
SVM
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의AUC
는<Table 3-1>
과 같다.
모델1
의 평균AUC
는0.81(
범위0.66-0.91),
모델2
의 평균AUC
는0.83(
범위0.70-0.90),
모델3
의 평균AUC
는0.95(
범위0.89-1.00)
로,
모델3
의AUC
가 가장 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
에서는Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery for
Keratoconus
의AUC
가0.91
로 가장 높았고, Impedance Controlled
Endometrial Ablation
의AUC
가0.66
으로 가장 낮았다.
모델2
에서는Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery for Keratoconus
와Magnetic Navigation
Assisted Catheter Technique
의AUC
가0.90
으로 가장 높았고, Glaucoma
Aqueous Tube Insertion
의AUC
가0.70
으로 가장 낮았다.
모델3
에서는Magnetic Navigation Assisted Catheter Technique
의AUC
가1.00
으로 가장 높았고, Auditory Brainstem Implant
의AUC
가0.89
로 가장 낮았다.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.80
(0.78-0.81)
0.82 (0.81-0.82)
0.89 (0.88-0.90) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.82 (0.74-0.86)
0.80 (0.78-0.82)
0.91 (0.90-0.92) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.75 (0.68-0.80)
0.76 (0.70-0.78)
0.92 (0.91-0.93) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.84 (0.83-0.86)
0.84 (0.84-0.85)
0.95 (0.94-0.96) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.67
(0.62-0.70)
0.70 (0.68-0.72)
0.97 (0.96-0.97)
Hand Transplantation 0.85
(0.81-0.88)
0.87 (0.86-0.88)
0.96 (0.95-0.97) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.82 (0.79-0.85)
0.84 (0.83-0.85)
0.96 (0.96) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.66 (0.62-0.72)
0.74 (0.73-0.75)
0.95 (0.93-0.95) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.91 (0.88-0.93)
0.90 (0.88-0.93)
0.98 (0.97-1.00) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.89 (0.86-0.92)
0.90 (0.88-0.90)
1.00 (0.99-1.00) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.78 (0.76-0.81)
0.79 (0.77-0.80)
0.97 (0.97-0.98) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.88
(0.85-0.90)
0.87 (0.85-0.88)
0.94 (0.93-0.95)
0.81 0.80 0.93
Table 3-1. Mean AUCs of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using SVM with TAMP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.88 (0.85-0.93)
0.87 (0.86-0.88)
0.96 (0.95-0.96) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.86 (0.86-0.88)
0.86 (0.85-0.87)
0.91 (0.90-0.92) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.68
(0.66-0.71)
0.75 (0.72-0.77)
0.98 (0.97-0.98) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.84
(0.81-0.86)
0.87 (0.86-0.87)
0.98 (0.98) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.86
(0.85-0.88)
0.84 (0.83-0.85)
0.95 (0.94-0.95)
MEAN 0.81
(0.66-0.91)
0.83 (0.70-0.90)
0.95 (0.89-1.00) The range of AUC is shown in parenthesis.
SVM
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 정확도는<Table 3-2>
와 같다.
모델1
의 평균 정확도는0.83(
범위0.67-0.93),
모델2
의 평균 정확도는0.73(
범 위0.36-0.89),
모델3
의 평균 정확도는0.90(
범위0.79-0.97)
으로,
모델3
의 정확도가 가장 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
에서는Hand Transplantation
의 정확도가0.93
으로 가장 높았고, Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion
의 정확도가0.67
로 가장 낮았다.
모델2
에서는Hand Transplantation
의 정확도가0.89
로 가장 높았고, Continuous Intraarticular Pain Control
의 정확도가0.36
으로 가장 낮았다.
모든 주제에서 모델1
의 정확도가 모델2
보다 높았다.
모델3
에서는Magnetic Navigation Assisted Catheter Technique
의 정확도가0.97
로 가장 높았고, Auditory Brainstem Implant
와Impedance Controlled
Endometrial Ablation
의 정확도가0.79
로 가장 낮았다.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.76
(0.72-0.80)
0.63 (0.59-0.71)
0.79 (0.77-0.82) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.89 (0.88-0.90)
0.80 (0.77-0.81)
0.81 (0.76-0.85) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.69 (0.61-0.75)
0.36 (0.29-0.43)
0.88 (0.87-0.90) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.88 (0.87-0.90)
0.84 (0.83-0.85)
0.94 (0.94-0.96) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.67
(0.64-0.72)
0.57 (0.55-0.59)
0.95 (0.94-0.96)
Hand Transplantation 0.93
(0.92-0.94)
0.89 (0.88-0.90)
0.94 (0.93-0.95) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.78 (0.77-0.80)
0.72 (0.70-0.75)
0.91 (0.90-0.91) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.80 (0.77-0.82)
0.76 (0.74-0.80)
0.79 (0.79) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.86 (0.84-0.89)
0.71 (0.67-0.75)
0.91 (0.88-0.93) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.92 (0.91-0.93)
0.86 (0.85-0.88)
0.97 (0.95-0.98) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.80 (0.78-0.82)
0.71 (0.71-0.72)
0.95 (0.93-0.96) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.86
(0.81-0.88)
0.74 (0.72-0.77)
0.87 (0.86-0.88)
Somatic Nerves Stimulation 0.90
(0.87-0.92)
0.82 (0.76-0.85)
0.88 (0.87-0.91) Surgical Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation
0.83 (0.82-0.84)
0.72 (0.71-0.74)
0.95 (0.92-0.97)
Table 3-2. Mean Accuracies of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using SVM with TAMP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.84 (0.82-0.85)
0.76 (0.74-0.76)
0.93 (0.92-0.94) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.84 (0.82-0.84)
0.80 (0.79-0.81)
0.85 (0.84-0.86) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.80
(0.74-0.84)
0.58 (0.56-0.62)
0.94 (0.91-0.96) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.82
(0.78-0.86)
0.71 (0.69-0.73)
0.94 (0.94-0.95) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.89
(0.87-0.91)
0.82 (0.80-0.84)
0.89 (0.87-0.90)
MEAN 0.83
(0.67-0.93)
0.73 (0.36-0.89)
0.90 (0.79-0.97) The range of accuracy is shown in parenthesis.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.60
(0.43-0.71)
0.87 (0.79-1.00)
0.87 (0.79-1.00) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.34 (0.28-0.39)
0.60 (0.44-0.67)
0.60 (0.44-0.67) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.69 (0.50-0.82)
0.95 (0.91-0.95)
0.95 (0.91-0.95) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.34 (0.29-0.36)
0.47 (0.43-0.57)
0.47 (0.43-0.57) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.52
(0.40-0.70)
0.86 (0.80-0.90)
0.86 (0.80-0.90)
Hand Transplantation 0.38
(0.20-0.50)
0.48 (0.40-0.50)
0.48 (0.40-0.50) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.68 (0.59-0.74)
0.83 (0.79-0.88)
0.83 (0.79-0.88) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.27 (0.18-0.36)
0.36 (0.36)
0.36 (0.36)
SVM
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 민감도는<Table 3-3>
과 같다.
모델1
의 평균 민감도는0.51(
범위0.27-0.71),
모델2
와 모델3
의 평균 민감도는0.75(
범위0.36-0.98)
로,
모델2
와 모델3
의 민감도가 모델1
보다 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1, 2, 3
모두Therapeutic Temperature Management with Endovascular Catheters
의 민감도가0.71, 0.98, 0.98
로 가장 높았고, Impedance Controlled Endometrial Ablation
의 민감도가0.27, 0.36, 0.36
으로 가장 낮았다.
모든 주제에서 모델2
와 모델3
의 민감도가 모델1
보다 높 았다.
Table 3-3. Mean Sensitivities of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using SVM with TAMP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.65 (0.55-0.74)
0.94 (0.87-0.97)
0.94 (0.87-0.97) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.33 (0.07-0.50)
0.79 (0.64-0.86)
0.79 (0.64-0.86) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.41 (0.33-0.56)
0.76 (0.61-0.89)
0.76 (0.61-0.89) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.70
(0.63-0.74)
0.87 (0.78-0.93)
0.87 (0.78-0.93)
Somatic Nerves Stimulation 0.38
(0.33-0.42)
0.53 (0.42-0.67)
0.53 (0.42-0.67) Surgical Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation
0.65 (0.38-0.85)
0.92 (0.92)
0.92 (0.92) Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.71 (0.63-0.88)
0.98 (0.94-1.00)
0.98 (0.94-1.00) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.59 (0.46-0.75)
0.81 (0.79-0.89)
0.81 (0.79-0.89) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.32
(0.20-0.40)
0.80 (0.70-0.90)
0.80 (0.70-0.90) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.61
(0.41-0.81)
0.88 (0.84-0.91)
0.88 (0.84-0.91) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.51
(0.45-0.55)
0.58 (0.55-0.64)
0.58 (0.55-0.64)
MEAN 0.51
(0.27-0.71)
0.75 (0.36-0.98)
0.75 (0.36-0.98) The range of sensitivity is shown in parenthesis.
SVM
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 특이도는<Table 3-4>
와 같다.
모델1
의 평균 특이도는0.85(
범위0.68-0.96),
모델2
의 평균 특이도는0.73(
범 위0.34-0.91),
모델3
의 평균 특이도는0.93(
범위0.77-1.00)
으로,
모델3
의 특이도가 가장 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
에서는Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
과Hand Transplantation
의 특이도가0.96
으로 가장 높았고, Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion
의 특이도가0.68
로 가장 낮았다.
모델2
에서는Hand Transplantation
의 특이도가0.91
로 가장 높았고,
Continuous Intraarticular Pain Control
의 특이도가0.34
로 가장 낮았다.
모 든 주제에서 모델1
의 특이도가 모델2
보다 높았다.
모델3
에서는Impedance Controlled Endometrial Ablation
과Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
의 특이도가1.00
으로 가장 높았고, Auditory Brainstem
Implant
의 특이도가0.77
로 가장 낮았다.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.77
(0.72-0.83)
0.61 (0.56-0.70)
0.77 (0.72-0.83) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.96 (0.95-0.98)
0.83 (0.79-0.84)
0.98 (0.96-1.00) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.69 (0.61-0.75)
0.34 (0.27-0.41)
0.84 (0.82-0.87) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.91 (0.89-0.92)
0.86 (0.85-0.86)
0.98 (0.98-0.99) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.68
(0.64-0.72)
0.56 (0.55-0.59)
0.95 (0.95-0.96)
Hand Transplantation 0.96
(0.94-0.97)
0.91 (0.90-0.92)
0.98 (0.97-0.99) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.81 (0.78-0.82)
0.70 (0.68-0.74)
0.93 (0.90-0.95) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.90 (0.87-0.93)
0.84 (0.82-0.89)
1.00 (1.00) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.91 (0.90-0.94)
0.66 (0.61-0.71)
0.88 (0.85-0.92) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.94 (0.93-0.95)
0.86 (0.85-0.89)
1.00 (1.00) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.82 (0.79-0.84)
0.71 (0.70-0.72)
0.96 (0.96-0.97) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.86
(0.82-0.88)
0.74 (0.72-0.77)
0.87 (0.85-0.88)
0.92 0.82 0.98
Table 3-4. Mean Specificities of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using SVM with TAMP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.85 (0.83-0.87)
0.74 (0.73-0.75)
0.92 (0.92) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.86 (0.85-0.89)
0.80 (0.79-0.80)
0.86 (0.85-0.87) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.82
(0.76-0.87)
0.58 (0.54-0.61)
0.96 (0.93-0.98) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.84
(0.78-0.89)
0.70 (0.68-0.72)
0.96 (0.96) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.90
(0.87-0.92)
0.82 (0.80-0.84)
0.95 (0.94-0.96)
MEAN 0.85
(0.68-0.96)
0.73 (0.34-0.91)
0.93 (0.77-1.00) The range of specificity is shown in parenthesis.
(2) Na
їve Bayesian
Na
їve Bayesian
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 정확도는<Table 3-5>
와 같 다.
모델1
의 평균 정확도는0.78(
범위0.34-0.90),
모델2
의 평균 정확도 는0.70(
범위0.24-0.87),
모델3
의 평균 정확도는0.89(
범위0.74-0.95)
로,
모델3
의 정확도가 가장 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
과 모델2
에서는Magnetic Navigation
Assisted Catheter Technique
의 정확도가 각각0.90, 0.87
로 가장 높았고,
Continuous Intraarticular Pain Control
의 정확도가 각각0.34, 0.24
로 가장 낮았다. Impedance Controlled Endometrial Ablation
을 제외한 모든 주제에 서 모델1
의 정확도가 모델2
보다 높았다.
모델3
에서는Intrastromal
Corneal Ring Surgery for Keratoconus
의 정확도가0.95
로 가장 높았고,
Auditory Brainstem Implant
의 정확도가0.74
로 가장 낮았다.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.80
(0.69-0.85)
0.67 (0.65-0.72)
0.74 (0.72-0.75) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.85 (0.80-0.89)
0.75 (0.71-0.78)
0.76 (0.73-0.78) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.34 (0.31-0.40)
0.24 (0.21-0.29)
0.86 (0.83-0.90) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.85 (0.81-0.87)
0.79 (0.77-0.82)
0.91 (0.89-0.93) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.60
(0.54-0.65)
0.51 (0.50-0.52)
0.90 (0.89-0.91)
Hand Transplantation 0.82
(0.76-0.87)
0.79 (0.77-0.83)
0.92 (0.91-0.94) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.82 (0.79-0.83)
0.73 (0.69-0.80)
0.88 (0.76-0.93) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.67 (0.64-0.73)
0.77 (0.71-0.80)
0.89 (0.88-0.94) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.81 (0.73-0.89)
0.61 (0.54-0.66)
0.95 (0.93-0.96) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.90 (0.89-0.92)
0.87 (0.86-0.88)
0.92 (0.91-0.94) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.75 (0.69-0.79)
0.69 (0.68-0.72)
0.94 (0.93-0.96) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.85
(0.83-0.88)
0.76 (0.74-0.79)
0.87 (0.85-0.90)
Somatic Nerves Stimulation 0.84
(0.81-0.88)
0.75 (0.66-0.79)
0.94 (0.93-0.96) Surgical Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation
0.73 (0.63-0.84)
0.64 (0.52-0.69)
0.89 (0.78-0.92)
Table 3-5. Mean Accuracies of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using Na
їve Bayesian with TAMP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.74 (0.69-0.78)
0.68 (0.63-0.73)
0.89 (0.87-0.92) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.86 (0.85-0.87)
0.84 (0.83-0.86)
0.87 (0.85-0.89) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.83
(0.77-0.89)
0.60 (0.55-0.66)
0.94 (0.92-0.96) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.86
(0.83-0.88)
0.76 (0.74-0.80)
0.92 (0.89-0.93) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.82
(0.78-0.84)
0.76 (0.69-0.79)
0.92 (0.85-0.98)
MEAN 0.78
(0.34-0.90)
0.70 (0.24-0.87)
0.89 (0.74-0.95) The range of accuracy is shown in parenthesis.
Na
їve Bayesian
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 민감도는<Table 3-6>
과 같 다.
모델1
의 평균 민감도는0.62(
범위0.31-1.00),
모델2
와 모델3
의 평 균 민감도는0.78(
범위0.47-1.00)
로,
모델2
와 모델3
의 민감도가 모델1
보다 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
에서는Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation
의 민감 도가1.00
으로 가장 높았고, Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone Marrow
Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
의 민감도가0.31
로 가장 낮았다.
모델2
와 모델3
에서는Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation
의 민감도가1.00
으로 가장 높았고, Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung Tumors
와Magnetic Navigation
Assisted Catheter Technique
의 민감도가0.47
로 가장 낮았다.
모든 주제에 서 모델2
와 모델3
의 민감도가 모델1
보다 높았다.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.79
(0.50-1.00)
0.94 (0.86-1.00)
0.94 (0.86-1.00) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.37 (0.28-0.39)
0.54 (0.50-0.61)
0.54 (0.50-0.61) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.92 (0.86-0.95)
0.95 (0.95)
0.95 (0.95) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.46 (0.36-0.57)
0.47 (0.36-0.57)
0.47 (0.36-0.57) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.72
(0.70-0.80)
0.86 (0.80-0.90)
0.86 (0.80-0.90)
Hand Transplantation 0.58
(0.30-0.80)
0.60 (0.50-0.70)
0.60 (0.50-0.70) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.53 (0.26-0.71)
0.71 (0.12-0.91)
0.71 (0.12-0.91) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.62 (0.55-0.64)
0.69 (0.64-0.82)
0.69 (0.64-0.82) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.92 (0.84-0.97)
0.99 (0.97-1.00)
0.99 (0.97-1.00) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.36 (0.21-0.50)
0.47 (0.36-0.64)
0.47 (0.36-0.64) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.72 (0.50-0.94)
0.91 (0.83-1.00)
0.91 (0.83-1.00) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.64
(0.56-0.70)
0.84 (0.78-0.93)
0.84 (0.78-0.93)
0.90 0.90 0.90
Table 3-6. Mean Sensitivities of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using Na
їve Bayesian with TAMP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.65 (0.56-0.81)
0.91 (0.75-1.00)
0.91 (0.75-1.00) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.31 (0.14-0.57)
0.50 (0.32-0.64)
0.50 (0.32-0.64) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.40
(0.30-0.50)
0.86 (0.70-1.00)
0.86 (0.70-1.00) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.35
(0.25-0.56)
0.68 (0.53-0.78)
0.68 (0.53-0.78) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 1.00
(1.00)
1.00 (1.00)
1.00 (1.00)
MEAN 0.62
(0.31-1.00)
0.78 (0.47-1.00)
0.78 (0.47-1.00) The range of sensitivity is shown in parenthesis.
Na
їve Bayesian
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 특이도는<Table 3-7>
과 같 다.
모델1
의 평균 특이도는0.79(
범위0.32-0.93),
모델2
의 평균 특이도 는0.69(
범위0.22-0.88),
모델3
의 평균 특이도는0.91(
범위0.67-1.00)
로,
모델3
의 특이도가 가장 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
에서는Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
의 특이도가0.93
으로 가장 높 았고, Continuous Intraarticular Pain Control
의 특이도가0.32
로 가장 낮았 다.
모델2
에서는Magnetic Navigation Assisted Catheter Technique
과Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial
Disease
의 특이도가0.88
로 가장 높았고, Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
의 특이도가0.22
로 가장 낮았다. Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
을 제외한 모든 주제에서 모델1
의 특이도가 모델2
보다 높았다.
모델3
에서는Magnetic Navigation Assisted Catheter Technique
의 특이도가1.00
으로 가장 높았고, Auditory Brainstem Implant
의 특이도가0.67
로 가 장 낮았다.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.80
(0.67-0.87)
0.65 (0.62-0.71)
0.67 (0.63-0.72) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.92 (0.86-0.98)
0.78 (0.74-0.80)
0.93 (0.91-0.96) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.32 (0.29-0.39)
0.22 (0.18-0.27)
0.81 (0.76-0.87) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.87 (0.82-0.88)
0.81 (0.79-0.84)
0.94 (0.82-0.96) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.60
(0.54-0.65)
0.50 (0.49-0.51)
0.90 (0.89-0.91)
Hand Transplantation 0.83
(0.75-0.89)
0.79 (0.78-0.84)
0.95 (0.94-0.97) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.88 (0.81-0.94)
0.74 (0.65-0.95)
0.95 (0.94-0.99) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.68 (0.64-0.76)
0.79 (0.71-0.84)
0.99 (0.95-1.00) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.78 (0.67-0.89)
0.53 (0.44-0.59)
0.91 (0.85-0.96) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.92 (0.90-0.94)
0.88 (0.87-0.89)
1.00 (0.99-1.00) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.75 (0.69-0.80)
0.69 (0.66-0.71)
0.94 (0.94-0.96) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.85
(0.84-0.88)
0.76 (0.73-0.78)
0.87 (0.84-0.89)
Somatic Nerves Stimulation 0.84
(0.80-0.89)
0.74 (0.65-0.79)
0.95 (0.93-0.98) Surgical Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation
0.74 (0.60-0.88)
0.62 (0.48-0.67)
0.88 (0.74-0.92)
Table 3-7. Mean Specificities of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using Na
їve Bayesian with TAMP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.75 (0.70-0.79)
0.66 (0.61-0.72)
0.89 (0.84-0.92) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.93 (0.91-0.94)
0.88 (0.86-0.91)
0.94 (0.92-0.96) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.85
(0.78-0.91)
0.59 (0.53-0.65)
0.96 (0.95-0.98) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.89
(0.84-0.92)
0.77 (0.73-0.81)
0.96 (0.96-0.97) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.82
(0.77-0.84)
0.75 (0.69-0.79)
0.90 (0.82-0.98)
MEAN 0.79
(0.32-0.93)
0.69 (0.22-0.88)
0.91 (0.67-1.00) The range of specificity is shown in parenthesis.
나
. Mesh
와 출판유형 조합: MP (1) SVM
SVM
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의AUC
는<Table 3-8>
과 같다.
모델1
의 평균AUC
는0.81(
범위0.68-0.90),
모델2
의 평균AUC
는0.81(
범위0.66-0.88),
모델3
의 평균AUC
는0.95(
범위0.76-0.99)
로,
모델3
의AUC
가 가장 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
에서는Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery for
Keratoconus
와Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
의AUC
가0.90
으로 가장 높았고, Hand Transplantation
의AUC
가0.68
로 가장 낮았다.
모델2
에서는Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
의AUC
가0.88
로 가장 높았 고, Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion
의AUC
가0.66
으로 가장 낮았다.
모 델3
에서는Magnetic Navigation Assisted Catheter Technique
과Surgical
Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
의AUC
가0.99
로 가장 높았고, Auditory
Brainstem Implant
의AUC
가0.76
으로 가장 낮았다.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.77
(0.75-0.79)
0.76 (0.73-0.77)
0.76 (0.75-0.77) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.80 (0.76-0.83)
0.83 (0.81-0.83)
0.98 (0.98-0.99) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.70 (0.69-0.72)
0.70 (0.69-0.71)
0.96 (0.95-0.96) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.86 (0.86-0.87)
0.86 (0.84-0.87)
0.97 (0.96-0.97) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.70
(0.67-0.72)
0.66 (0.65-0.67)
0.97 (0.97)
Hand Transplantation 0.68
(0.65-0.75)
0.75 (0.73-0.77)
0.97 (0.95-0.98) Holmium Laser Treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia
0.86 (0.85-0.88)
0.86 (0.85-0.86)
0.97 (0.97-0.98) Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.70 (0.68-0.73)
0.73 (0.70-0.78)
0.92 (0.91-0.94) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.90 (0.89-0.92)
0.85 (0.81-0.89)
0.94 (0.92-0.96) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.86 (0.85-0.87)
0.83 (0.82-0.86)
0.99 (0.99-1.00) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.87 (0.84-0.88)
0.86 (0.84-0.88)
0.96 (0.95-0.97) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.85
(0.84-0.87)
0.84 (0.81-0.86)
0.93 (0.93-0.94)
0.83 0.85 0.98
Table 3-8. Mean AUCs of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using SVM with MP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.86 (0.85-0.87)
0.86 (0.85-0.88)
0.96 (0.96) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.89 (0.88-0.90)
0.86 (0.86-0.87)
0.89 (0.89-0.90) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.81
(0.79-0.84)
0.77 (0.76-0.82)
0.97 (0.96-0.98) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.84
(0.81-0.87)
0.81 (0.79-0.83)
0.97 (0.97) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.79
(0.75-0.80)
0.76 (0.75-0.78)
0.96 (0.95-0.97)
MEAN 0.81
(0.68-0.90)
0.81 (0.66-0.88)
0.95 (0.76-0.99) The range of AUC is shown in parenthesis.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.79
(0.77-0.81)
0.61 (0.55-0.67)
0.69 (0.65-0.73) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.80 (0.78-0.82)
0.67 (0.61-0.72)
0.91 (0.90-0.93) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.33 (0.31-0.36)
0.20 (0.17-0.22)
0.94 (0.93-0.95) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0,86 (0.85-0.87)
0.75 (0.71-0.78)
0.94 (0.92-0.96) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.59
(0.58-0.60)
0.48 (0.45-0.50)
0.93 (0.92-0.93)
SVM
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 정확도는<Table 3-9>
와 같다.
모델1
의 평균 정확도는0.75(
범위0.33-0.88),
모델2
의 평균 정확도는0.61(
범 위0.20-0.78),
모델3
의 평균 정확도는0.90(
범위0.69-0.98)
으로,
모델3
의 정확도가 가장 높았다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
과 모델2
는Hand Transplantation
의 정확도 가 각각0.88, 0.78
로 가장 높았고, Continuous Intraarticular Pain Control
의 정확도가 각각0.33, 0.20
으로 가장 낮았다.
모든 주제에서 모델1
의 정확도가 모델2
보다 높았다.
모델3
에서는Magnetic Navigation Assisted Catheter Technique
의 정확도가0.98
로 가장 높았고, Auditory Brainstem Implant
의 정확도가0.69
로 가장 낮았다.
Table 3-9. Mean Accuracies of the Three Models across 19 Procedure
Systematic Reviews using SVM with MP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.71 (0.65-0.77)
0.63 (0.58-0.68)
0.81 (0.76-0.85) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.80 (0.78-0.83)
0.63 (0.61-0.68)
0.92 (0.91-0.93) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.87 (0.85-0.89)
0.76 (0.72-0.79)
0.98 (0.98) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.78 (0.76-0.82)
0.66 (0.61-0.69)
0.93 (0.93-0.94) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.82
(0.79-0.84)
0.65 (0.62-0.71)
0.85 (0.83-0.86)
Somatic Nerves Stimulation 0.75
(0.71-0.79)
0.51 (0.43-0.56)
0.93 (0.93-0.94) Surgical Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation
0.78 (0.75-0.82)
0.61 (0.53-0.68)
0.91 (0.87-0.94) Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.75 (0.73-0.76)
0.64 (0.57-0.67)
0.92 (0.86-0.94) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.86 (0.86-0.87)
0.74 (0.71-0.76)
0.81 (0.79-0.82) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.62
(0.60-0.65)
0.46 (0.42-0.48)
0.91 (0.89-0.92) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.73
(0.71-0.75)
0.61 (0.58-0.65)
0.92 (0.91-0.93) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.74
(0.73-0.75)
0.51 (0.45-0.56)
0.91 (0.90-0.92)
MEAN 0.75
(0.33-0.88)
0.61 (0.20-0.78)
0.90 (0.69-0.98) The range of accuracy is shown in parenthesis.
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Auditory Brainstem Implant 0.61
(0.57-0.64)
0.83 (0.79-0.86)
0.83 (0.79-0.86) Autologous Noncultured Epidermal
Cellular Transplantation
0.66 (0.56-0.72)
0.89 (0.83-0.94)
0.89 (0.83-0.94) Continuous Intraarticular Pain
Control
0.95 (0.95)
0.95 (0.95)
0.95 (0.95) Endoscopic Cryotherapy of Lung
Tumors
0.61 (0.57-0.64)
0.79 (0.79)
0.79 (0.79) Glaucoma Aqueous Tube Insertion 0.76
(0.70-0.80)
0.90 (0.90)
0.90 (0.90)
SVM
을 이용한 세 가지 모델의 민감도는<Table 3-10>
과 같다.
모델1
의 평균 민감도는0.70(
범위0.00-0.95),
모델2
와 모델3
의 평균 민감도는0.86(
범위0.38-1.00)
으로,
모델2
와 모델3
의 민감도가 모델1
보다 높았 다.
주제별로 살펴보면
,
모델1
에서는Continuous Intraarticular Pain Control
의 민감도가0.95
로 가장 높았고, Hand Transplantation
의 민감도가0.00
으로 가장 낮았다.
모델2
와 모델3
에서는Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
과Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery
의 민감도가1.00
으로 가장 높았고, Hand Transplantation
의 민감도가0.38
로 가장 낮았다.
모든 주제 에서 모델2
와 모델3
의 민감도가 모델1
보다 높았다.
Table 3-10. Mean Sensitivities of the Three Models across 19
Procedure Systematic Reviews using SVM with MP
Topics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Impedance Controlled Endometrial
Ablation
0.36 (0.36)
0.62 (0.55-0.73)
0.62 (0.55-0.73) Intrastromal Corneal Ring Surgery
for Keratoconus
0.88 (0.81-0.94)
0.97 (0.97-1.00)
0.97 (0.97-1.00) Magnetic Navigation Assisted
Catheter Technique
0.64 (0.50-0.79)
0.86 (0.86)
0.86 (0.86) Radiofrequency Ablation of Primary
and Secondary Lung Malignancy
0.82 (0.78-0.83)
0.91 (0.89-0.94)
0.91 (0.89-0.94) Small Bowel Transplantation 0.64
(0.48-0.78)
0.93 (0.89-0.96)
0.93 (0.89-0.96)
Somatic Nerves Stimulation 0.73
(0.67-0.83)
0.92 (0.83-1.00)
0.92 (0.83-1.00) Surgical Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation
0.94 (0.92-1.00)
1.00 (1.00)
1.00 (1.00) Therapeutic Temperature
Management with Endovascular Catheters
0.84 (0.81-0.94)
0.94 (0.94)
0.94 (0.94) Therapeutic Use of Autologous Bone
Marrow Cells in Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.84 (0.79-0.86)
0.91 (0.89-0.93)
0.91 (0.89-0.93) Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery 0.94
(0.80-1.00)
1.00 (1.00)
1.00 (1.00) Transarterial Radioembolization 0.82
(0.72-0.91)
0.94 (0.91-0.97)
0.94 (0.91-0.97) Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation 0.62
(0.55-0.64)
0.76 (0.73-0.82)
0.76 (0.73-0.82)
MEAN 0.70
(0.00-0.95)
0.86 (0.38-1.00)
0.86 (0.38-1.00) The range of sensitivity is shown in parenthesis.