• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Modeling and Injection Rate Estimation of a Piezo Injector for CRDI Diesel Engines

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Modeling and Injection Rate Estimation of a Piezo Injector for CRDI Diesel Engines"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

C o p y r ig h t 2 0 0 5 K S A E 1 2 2 5 - 6 3 8 2 / 2 0 0 5 / 0 7 4 - 1 3 T r a ns a c tio ns o f K SA E , V o l. 1 3 , N o . 2 , p p .9 3 -1 0 0 (2 0 0 5 )

N o m e nc lature1 )

! : a re a , M

B : v is c o u s fric tio n c o e ffic ie n t

#D : d is c h a rg e c o e ffic ie n t

$ : e le c tric d is p la c e m e n t, #M

% : e le c tric fie ld , 6M

& : fo rc e , .

M : m a s s , KG

*T o w h o m c o rr e s p o n d e n c e s h o u ld b e a d d re s s e d . m s u n w o o @ h a n y a n g .a c .k r

0 : p re s s u re , 0A

1 : v o lu m e tric flo w ra te , M S

3 : s tra in

4 : s tre s s , 0A

6 : v o lu m e , M

V : v o lta g e , 6

X : d is p la c e m e n t, M o r s ta te v a ria b le : b u lk m o d u lu s o f fu e l, .M

 : d e n s ity o f fu e l, KGM

*

Modeling and Injection Rate Estimation of a Piezo Injector for CRDI Diesel Engines

Sunwoo Kim Namhoon Chung Myoungho Sunwoo*

Department of Automotive Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea (Received 6 September 2004 / Accepted 25 November 2004)

A b s trac t : S trin g e n t e m is s io n re g u la tio n s a n d in c re a s in g d e m a n d s o n re d u c tio n s o f n o is e a n d v ib ra tio n o f c o m m o n ra il d ire c t in je c tio n (C R D I) d ie s e l e n g in e s le a d to th e a d v e n t o f p ie z o -a c tu a te d in je c to rs . C o m p a re d w ith s o le n o id -a c tu a te d in je c to rs , p ie z o -a c tu a te d in je c to rs g e n e ra te g re a te r fo rc e a n d g iv e fa s te r re s p o n s e tim e , re s u ltin g in m o re a c c u ra te a n d fa s te r in je c tio n s . T h e a c c u ra te a n d fa s t re s p o n s e o f a n in je c to r c a n o ffe r a n o p p o rtu n ity to c o n tro l th e c o m b u s tio n p ro c e s s a n d p o llu ta n t fo rm a tio n . In th is s tu d y , th e m a th e m a tic a l m o d e l o f a p ie z o -a c tu a te d in je c to r is d e v e lo p e d . A n e s tim a to r o f th e in je c tio n ra te o f th e p ie z o -a c tu a te d in je c to r is d e s ig n e d b a s e d o n th is m o d e l. T h e s lid in g m o d e th e o ry is a p p lie d to th e e s tim a to r d e s ig n in o rd e r to o v e rc o m e m o d e l u n c e rta in tie s . T h e in je c to r m o d e l a n d th e e s tim a to r a re v e rifie d b y th e in je c tio n e x p e rim e n ts in a n in je c to r te s t b e n c h . T h e s im u la tio n a n d th e e x p e rim e n ta l re s u lts s h o w th a t th e p ro p o s e d s lid in g m o d e o b s e rv e r c a n e ffe c tiv e ly e s tim a te th e in je c tio n tim in g a n d th e in je c tio n ra te o f th e p ie z o -a c tu a te d in je c to r.

K e y w o rd s : C R D I( ), P ie z o in je c to r( ), In je c tio n ra te ( ), S lid in g m o d e

o b s e rv e r( )

(2)

S ubs c ripts : c o n tro l c h a m b e r

, : n e e d le , n e e d le s e a t re s p e c tiv e ly : p o p p e t v a lv e

: p ie z o : s p rin g : s a c c h a m b e r

: v a lv e p is to n o r v a lv e c h a m b e r

1 .

C O2

, P M (p a rtic u la te m a tte r), N O x (id le )

.

.1 ) (c o m m o n ra il)

.

(ra il) (fu e l a c c u m u la to r)

.

(E C U ) (ra il p re s s u re ),

(in je c tio n tim in g ), (in je c tio n q u a n tity )

(in je c tio n ra te ) .2 ,3 )

(s o le n o id ) (p ie z o )

.

, .

(p ie z o -a c tu a te d in je c to r) (s o le n o id -a c tu a te d in je c to r)

.

,

.1 )

,

(fe e d b a c k

c o n tro l) .

.

2 .

2 - (2 -w a y v a lv e ) , F ig . 1

. 1 0 0 ~ 3 0 0

(c e ra m ic e le m e n t)

(p ie z o s ta c k ) ,

.

.4 )

( c o n v e r s e p ie z o e le c tr ic e f f e c t) .

( p i e z o s t a c k ) (p o p p e t v a lv e )

. ( c o n t r o l c h a m b e r )

Valve piston Piezo stack

Push rod

Oring Push rod spring

Poppet Valve spring

Return line

Outlet orifice Inlet orfice

Control chamber Servo piston

Needle spring

Accumulator chamber

Needle valve

Injection nozzle

Fig. 1 Operation principle of a piezo injector

(3)

(a c c u m u la to r c h a m b e r)

.

3 .

(p ie z o - a c tu a to r m o d e l), (m e c h a n ic a l m o d e l)

(h y d ra u lic m o d e l) .

, .

.1 ,7 )

. . . . .

.

3 .1 3 .1 .1

,

5 )

.

(1 ) (2 )

.6 )

(1)

? (2)

, ,

, ? .

F i g . 2 1 0 0

Fig. 2 Schematic of a piezo stack

. V

, XV . ,

(3 ) .4 )

(3)

(2 ) $ Q

. 3

, % V

(2 ) (4 )

.

? (4)

3 .1 .2

N e w to n 2 .

. , .

(5 ) .

(5)

,

(6 ) .

(4)

S u n w o o K im N am h o o n C h u n g M y o u n g h o S u n w o o

(6) , : c ro s s -s e c tio n a l a re a o f n e e d le v a lv e : c ro s s -s e c tio n a l a re a o f n e e d le s e a t 3 .1 .3

(c o n tro l v o lu m e )

. ,

, S a c (7 )

.1 0 )

0?  6 1IN1ON6? (7)

, <

K

3 .2

. F ig . 3 (a ) 6 0 0 b a r, 1 .2

m s

.

,

. 7 5 %

.

. 0 .8 m s

6 0 0 b a r

.

F ig . 3 ( b ) 4 0 0 b a r , 0 .3 m s

( p ilo t in je c tio n ) 1 .4 m s

( m a i n i n j e c t i o n )

.

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30

Time [ms]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

Measured data Simulation result

Injection Command

(a) Rail pressure : 600 bar, injection duration : 1.2 ms

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30

Time [ms]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

Measured data Simulation result

Injection Command

(b) Rail pressure : 400 bar, pilot injection duration : 0.3 ms, main injection duration : 1.4 ms

Fig. 3 Comparison between the measured and modeled injection rate

,

. 0 .1 m s .

. ,

(in je c tio n ra te m e te r) . F ig . 3 (a ) (b )

3 % .

(5)

M o d e lin g an d In je c tio n R ate E s tim atio n o f a P ie z o In je c to r f o r C R D I D ie s e l E n g in e s

,

.

4 .

4 .1

(s ta te v a ri-

a b le ) ,

.

,

.

(o b s e rv e r) .

, .

.

4 .2

. (L u e n b e rg e r)

8 )

9 )

. 8

, 2 1

. (8 )

,

(9 ) .

:?pF : 7 (8)

, : p ;X X X X X X X X= p ;Q XV X? 0V V 0C XN XN? 0S=

p

ppX>? ppFp FF:> 7 KppSGNXNpX> 

ppX>? ppFp FF:> 7 KppSGNXNpX> 

ppX>? ppFp FF:> 7 KppSGNXNpX> 

(9)

^

. (1 0 )

(1 1 ) .

pX^ ppXN X>pp (10)

pppX^? pprF N K ppSGN X^p pppX^? pprF N K ppSGN X^p pppX^? pprF N KppSGN X^p

(11)

, rFI FI: 7 N FI:> 7

S (1 2 )

cI (1 3 )

.

S  X^p (12)

DTD 

 

 S  SS?

pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp X^pIrFINKISGNX^p NcI£S£

(13)

KI (1 4 ) .

KI cI £rFI£ (14)

(1 4 ) X^p 0

. :T

(6)

.

5 .

F ig . 4 (in je c to r te s t b e n c h )

.

. 1 0 0 ~ 1 4 0 0 b a r

(p u ls e g e n e ra to r) (in je c to r d riv e r)

.

. O N O S O K K I

F J 4 0 0 P IE Z O M E C H A N IK

. .

Fig. 4 Experimental setup of injector test bench

6 .

,

. F ig . 5

,

. F ig . 5 (a ), (b ), (c ) (d )

1 .2 m s ,

4 0 0 , 6 0 0 , 8 0 0 , 1 2 0 0 b a r . F ig . 5 (e )

(f) 1 .4 m s 0 .3

m s

4 0 0 , 6 0 0 b a r .

F ig . 5 (a ), (b ) (c ) ,

1 0 %

(o v e rs h o o t) . F ig . 5 (b )

6 0 0 b a r

.

. 1 2 0 0

b a r F ig . 5 (d )

.

(in te rn a l le a k a g e )

(c a v ita tio n )

. F ig . 5 (e ) (f)

. 3 %

.

.

7 .

(fe e d b a c k c o n tro l)

,

.

. . 1 )

(7)

0 50 100 150

Voltage [V]

0 2 4 6 8

Charge [×10-4C] M e a sure d

Estim a te d

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30 40

Tim e [m s]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

M e a sure d Estim a te d Ra il pre ssure : 400 ba r Inje ction dura tion : 1.2 m s

0 50 100 150

Voltage [V]

0 2 4 6 8

Charge [×10-4C]

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30 40

Tim e [m s]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

M e a sure d Estim a te d

M e a sure d Estim a te d Ra il pre ssure : 1200 ba r Inje ction dura tion : 1.2 m s

(a) Rail pressure of 400 bar, injection duration of 1.2 ms (d) Rail pressure of 1200 bar, injection duration of 1.2 ms

0 50 100 150

Voltage [V]

0 2 4 6 8

Charge [×10-4C]

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30 40

Tim e [m s]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

M e a sure d Estim a te d

M e a sure d Estim a te d Ra il pre ssure : 600 ba r Inje ction dura tion : 1.2 m s

0 50 100 150

Voltage [V]

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30 40

Tim e [m s]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

0 2 4 6 8

Charge [×10-4C] M e a sure d

Estim a te d

M e a sure d Estim a te d Ra il pre ssure : 400 ba r P ilot dura tion : 0.3 m s M a in dura tion : 1.4 m s

(b) Rail pressure of 600 bar, injection duration of 1.2 ms (e) Rail pressure of 400 bar, pilot injection duration of 0.3 ms, main injection duration of 1.4 ms

0 50 100 150

Voltage [V]

0 2 4 6 8

Charge [×10-4C]

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30 40

Tim e [m s]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

M e a sure d Estim a te d

M e a sure d Estim a te d Ra il pre ssure : 800 ba r Inje ction dura tion : 1.2 m s

0 50 100 150

Voltage [V]

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 10 20 30 40

Tim e [m s]

Inj. rate [mm3/ms]

0 2 4 6 8

Charge [×10-4C] M easured

Es tim ated

M easured Es tim ated Ra il pre ssure : 600 ba r P ilot dura tion : 0.3 m s M a in dura tion : 1.4 m s

(c) Rail pressure of 800 bar, injection duration of 1.2 ms (f) Rail pressure of 600 bar, pilot injection duration of 0.3 ms, main injection duration of 1.4 ms

Fig. 5 Comparison between the measured and estimated electric charge and injection rate

(8)

S u n w o o K im N am h o o n C h u n g M y o u n g h o S u n w o o

.

2 ) 8

.

3 0 ,

1 5 % ,

3 % .

3 )

.

4 ) 4 0 0 ~ 1 2 0 0 b a r

. 5 )

.

(M 1 -0 4 1 2 -0 0 -0 0 5 8 )

(M 1 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 0 6 -0 4 L 2 6 0 1 -0 0 6 1 5 )

, .

R e fe re nc e s

1 ) K . N a m , S . P a r k a n d M . S u n w o o , “ D y n a m ic M o d e l o f a n H S D I C o m m o n - r a il I n je c to r a n d I n je c tio n R a te E s tim a tio n ,” T r a n s a c tio n s o f K S A E , V o l.1 1 , N o .5 , p p .4 3 - 4 9 , 2 0 0 3 .

2 ) G . S tu m p p a n d M . R ic c o , “ C o m m o n R a il - A n A ttr a c tiv e F u e l I n je c tio n S y s te m f o r P a s s e n g e r C a r D I D ie s e l E n g in e s ,” S A E 9 6 0 8 7 0 , 1 9 9 6 .

3 ) W . B o e h n e r a n d K . H u m m e l, “ C o m m o n R a il I n je c tio n S y s te m f o r C o m m e r c ia l D ie s e l V e h i- c le s ,” S A E 9 7 0 3 4 5 , 1 9 9 7 .

4 ) N . J a lili, J . W a g n e r a n d M . D a d f a r n ia , “ A P ie z o e le c tr ic D r iv e n R a tc h e t A c tu a to r M e c h a - n is m w ith A p p lic a tio n to A u to m o tiv e E n g in e V a lv e s ,” M e c h a tr o n ic s , V o l.1 3 , p p .9 3 3 - 9 5 6 , 2 0 0 3 .

5 ) H . A d r ia e n s , W . L . d e K o n in g a n d R . B a n n in g ,

“ M o d e lin g P ie z o le c tr ic A c tu a to r s ,” I E E E / A S M E T r a n s a c tio n s o n M e c h a tr o n ic s , V o l.5 , N o .4 , p p .3 3 1 - 3 4 1 , D e c , 2 0 0 0 .

6 ) A n A m e r ic a n N a tio n a l S ta n d a r d : I E E E S ta n - d a r d o n P ie z o e le c tr ic ity , A N S I /I E E E S ta n d a r d 1 7 6 - 1 9 8 7 , 1 9 8 7 .

7 ) D . B a r a n o w s k i, W . K lu g l a n d D S c h o p p e ,

“ S im u la tio n a n d D e s ig n O p tim iz a tio n o f a C o m m o n R a il P ie z o I n je c to r f o r P a s s e n g e r C a r D I D ie s e l E n g in e s ,” F u e l I n je c tio n S y s te m s , p p .2 1 9 - 2 3 2 , 1 9 9 9 .

8 ) E . A . M is a w a a n d J . H e d r ic k , “ N o n lin e a r O b s e r v e r s - A S ta te - o f - th e - A r t S u r v e y ,” T r a n s . A S M E , J o u r n a l o f D y n a m ic S y s te m s , M e a s u r e - m e n t, a n d C o n tr o l, V o l.1 1 1 , S e p ., 1 9 8 9 .

9 ) J . E . S lo tin e , J . K . H e d r ic k a n d E . A . M is a w a ,

“ O n S lid in g O b s e r v e r f o r N o n lin e a r S y s te m s ,”

T r a n s . A S M E , J o u r n a l o f D y n a m ic S y s te m s , M e a s u r e m e n t, a n d C o n tr o l, V o l.1 0 9 , S e p ., 1 9 8 7 .

1 0 ) V . L . S tr e e te r a n d E . B . W y lie , F lu id M e c h a - n ic s , M c G r a w - H ill, N e w Y o r k , 1 9 7 9 .

수치

Fig. 1 Operation principle of a piezo injector
Fig. 2 Schematic of a piezo stack
Fig. 3 Comparison  between  the  measured  and  modeled  injection rate ,  .  0 .1  m s
Fig. 4 Experimental setup of injector test bench
+2

참조

관련 문서

4.14 Comparison of calculated hardness brinell by the model of Venugopalan et al.[8] and measured values from the present study and a literature[5].. 4.15 Comparison

For establishing appropriate treatment plans and prognosis, the estimated value of the correlation between the change in hard and soft tissues is required,

Comparison of the prevalence of Malnutrition and Overweight, Obesity between South Korean families and North Korean refugees families 15 Table 5.. Comparison of the

Comparison of pain scale between the conventional and 2-step needle insertion technique according to the injection area ··· 11... The combination of pain scale and

For camera 1, comparison of actual vision data and the estimated vision system model’s values in robot movement stage, based on the EKF method(unit: pixel) ···.. The estimated

Figure 6.23 Comparison of the average absorption coefficient between the honeycomb panel and HMPP for a 25-mm core thickness.. 174 Figure 6.24 Comparison of STL between

The influence of age and gender on remifentanil EC 50 for preventing microemulsion propofol injection pain.. - Remifentanil EC 50 on propofol injection

Finally the relationship of the weight rate in fiber content of the product and fiber orientation function J and that of the injection molding condition and fiber