IEG 환경지질연구정보센터
11
0
0
전체 글
(2) f>7Á·Ò~ÁÒ'Áç¢Á*ç^. 54. 1.. B . j& ê>¦V /³® ~V · 7ëf *Ò ;öê ÿΦæö ôf ö ê7" ZÁö7B .³7 Öj ÖÂ~& . ZÁö7Öf "æ ~ãö ~ º 'ËK V r^ö *Ò ;¦öBê 7Ö öVbö ~ Æ· 5 ~ J"~ 'Ë ï&¢ ~ ® . ¾ ¢>'b ¾Ò>æ pf 7 ¾ 7Ò, 'b,  >, FÂ> ~ 7Öÿö ~ öVbö FB F 7 .³~ ³êº ÖÒ¾¢~ Æ·~㻾 >î~ã »~ V& ¸f ©b > ®b , 7ÖöV bö ~ ³ãæ~ J" &ËWf 7ÖöVbö FB 7.³ ~ ªf "æ ~ãö V 7.³~ Ï 5 ÿö & æ ìb '. 7" ®&Ë~ . "ö ç~ ®º ^B 7~ ~¾º 7Öÿö ~ BB 7öÒ ö ~ ©b 7Öö>, 7ÖöVb «~~ J" bî æ~>, ;, Æ·j ¶ êö F«>B Fbî~ · ¶;ËKj º*¢ >bB B>º ~ã^B . -² "ææ ~ ~ãö 'Ëj ~º J"~ "öf 7Ö ÿö ~ B>º F 7.³" ?f J"bî" ZÁö7 B ê 7 öÒË, öWê, öC öB B>º Â>f ÏÂ>º F 7.³ , F 7. ³f Æ· 5 >ê ÿ~ ~Â, Æ· 5 ³ãæ¢ J"Ê ® . 7.³~ Ò;f Ï ßW~ «ö & º 7Öÿö ~ 7ÖöVb~ ÿö 'Ï &Ë~ ß® 7 ¢ ã 6º 7Ò6ö ~ ÏÒ~&j ãÖ ~Âb~ ÿ, æ~>~ FÂ, æ Æ·~ J" & ËWj .G~º 7º ;¢ B ©b 6B. . ÖÒ¾¢~ ÿÎ öB §B Ú OËb ª~ ®º .³7Ö¾ Cê7Öæ~ Ö7b 7 F >Ú ®º '« F 7.³ "ææ~ ³ãæ j J"Ò > ®º ÆÒ' J"ö F > ® . V¢B ö ê7" ZÁö .³7Ö 5 7Ò6ö & Æ·J" &ËWö & ÖF B* Ö; jº~ ö V¢ J "æö & ~ã öÖFB*¢ Ö; > ® . öÖF B*¢ Ö;~V *Bº ZÁö. ³7Ö 5 ê7, öÒ¾ÒË "æö 7.³ FÂ> Ú ~ãö Ò~º 7.³ Ú 5 ~ãö Ú¶ ;ê ~ F 'Ëj ~º&¢ 6 > ®Ú¢ . J"ï&¢ ~V * V& 7.³ö ~ J"6 V&¢ > ® . ZÁö7B 7Öæ~ J" 80. 1). 2,3). öj B > ®º VF' 7"O» ÚæV * ~ ZÁö7B 7Öæj &çb 7.³ö ~ J "6V& J;>Ú¢ ~, ZÁö7B 7Öæ~ öÖFB*¢ Ö;~¢ . 7.³ö ~ J"6V&~ J;f ZÁö.³7Ö 5 ê7, öÒ¾ÒËöB VÂ>º 7.³ " Æ· 5 ~Âb FÂ>æ 7Öæ~ J"*~ 6f Æ· (³ãæ 5 j³ãæ), "~ 5 WÚ >f Â>, bÚöB~ 7.³ö ~ J";ê¢ V&b J;>Ú ¢ . ¾, ÖÒ¾¢f öB~ 7ÖæöB VÂ>º 7.³ö ~ J"6V&~ J; «{~² BB : ì . º Kÿ æj &çb öê7 5 ZÁö 7B .³7ÖöB BB 7öÒf ÖW7ÖV>ö ~ "ææ ³ãæ Æ·ö FB 7.³(Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Ni)~ Ò;~ ßWj «~ ÿ &ËW" 7.³ Ò;ö V J"6V& J;~ Òê&Ò&k ¾ ö&kj * V.' ¶ò¢ B~J . 1). 4). 5). 6). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003. 2.. Òò 5 O». Òæ6 5 òj ö ÒÏB òº ;öê 'ú çÿsj &Û ~ vº Kÿ "ææ~ ³ãæ Æ·j j © . Òæ~ ³ãæ Æ· òº Kÿ ç~æ~ öê7 ÖÒ ®º æ" çÿ7ë² "ææ 5 7 Ò6æ~ ³ãæ, 7~~ 7Ò6" 7Ò6 æ~ ³ãæ 5 ~~~ ÖW7ÖV>~ 'Ëj A~j ©b .ç>º Kÿ öê7 æ~ ³ãæ¢ &çb ~ [, 0~15 cm~ æ6öB ò¢ j~& . j òº &Wj Fæ~V *~ 7Ò6~ [ j 1~2 m *Ï~ 9B æb ªÒ~ ''~ ÆöB ò¢ j ê b~ ÒÏ~& . Table 1" Fig. 1f j ò«" jæ6 j ¾æÞ © . 2.1. Òæ~ æî' ßW ;öê 'úö çÿs ¾Ò¦V &~Òö º KÿÂf WÖ ~ 'Ëb ê jv' p >ê& ö^B KÿÂj ;W . æf CêV z C, &C²z, æWz 5 z;z~ W>Ú ®b, & ¦ª S ã·æ ;WB ç~æf Cê7 ö> 5. C7b ~Âb F«Nb ³ã >ö æ& 'Ëj ~ ® 6 çÿ7Ö" ê7ÖöB ¾J 2.2.
(3) ö7Öæ ã·æ Æ·~ 7.³ Ò;f Æ·J"ï& Table 1. Sample ID of cultivated land and sampling locations Sample I.D. soil sampling locations site characteristics F-1 Myungjin abandoned mine Field soil F-2 Sejin abandoned mine Field soil F-3 Sangdong mine Field soil F-4 Sangdong Field soil F-5 New tailing dam Field soil F-6 New tailing dam Field soil F-7 Old tailing dam Field soil F-8 Old tailing dam Field soil F-9 Kasan Field soil F-10 Kasan Paddy rice soil F-11 Nokjun Field soil F-12 Nokjun Paddy rice soil F-13 Yarouo Field soil F-14 Yarouo Paddy rice soil F-15 Limestone mine Field soil F-16 Okdong abandoned mine Field soil F-17 Okdong abandoned mine Paddy rice soil. 55. ~ [ Æ·~ ãÖ ÎÞ" *ö B>º :²ö ~ ^ ªê "æ ³ãæ Æö 9Vê ~ J"& ËWj z" ® . ò~ ªC 5 ï& O» 7 ~ 7.³ ª³z¢ >¯~V * ò¢ 40 Cö B B .~ V 63 µm j.³ Ú(nylon bolting cloth sieve) Úî ~ ªCö ÒÏ~& . « ê ªCf Ú ªC(sieving)" ; ªC(pipette method) j ÷¯~ ~& . 64 µm ç~ «ãj <º « ¶º Ú ÚÚ Ú ªCj ~ ~º ; ª Cj ~& . Æ·~ ÆW(texture)f ³Z¦»ö V¢ ª~~&, «ê ªCf Shepard , ï «êº Folk ~ ª~ O»j V¶ . 2 mm Ú¢ Û" 7 Æ ·~ FVb ïf ;6ï»j ÒÏ~ G;~&b, C FV ê² ïf Gaudette ~ O»ö V¢ ªC ~& . Æ· FVb~ ¦zêº Kjeldahl»b G; Cî²f ;6ï»b G; FVb~ j¢ Ï~ Ö;~&b, Cî²f FVb~ j& 20~¢ ãÖº Oligohumic, 20~25¢ ãÖº Mesohumic, 25 ç¢ r º Polyhumicb ª~& . Æ· Ú 7.³~ Ò ;º Tessier ~ O»ö V¢ adsorbed form, carbonate form, reducible form, organic form, residual form ª ~~ ºÂ~&b, 7.³~ ³êº ICP (Perkin Elmer XL 3100, USA)¢ Ï~ G;~& . Ò æ ~ 7.³ Ò;ö V J"6V&f ~~ J"6V&j Æ& ~ Non polluted, Weakly polluted, Moderately polluted, Heavily polluted ª~ ~ ï&~& (Table 2). Æ·J"ï&æ>º 7.³~ Ò;ê ªCB ¶ò ¢ ' êî ªC~¢ Interdepartmental Committee 2.3. o. 7). 8). 9). 10). 11). 6). Fig. 1. Location of the cultivated land sampling sites in the study area.. º 7ÖV>ê KÿÂb F«>, 7~ö F~ 7 Ò6" 7Ò6~ Â>f 7Ò6ö 9jz 7 5 ~ ~~ CêöC '~Ë f s>V r ;Öö ~ ~Âb F«>Ú >îJ"j &7Ê ®b, ß® 7 6 Table 2. The pollution division level of various heavy metals (unit: mg/kg dry soil) Pollution division Non Weakly Moderately Heavily polluted polluted polluted polluted Cd 1 3 10 50 Cu 100 200 500 2500 Pb 200 500 1000 5000 Ni 20 50 200 1000 Zn 250 500 1000 5000 Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Committee. Land (ICRCL) (1987).. on the Redevelopment of Committee Land(ICRCL). 1987;. f Hobson ~ ¢^öB ¾æÞ J"6V&~ >~ ¾. ê ªCB ö² Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn~ j ö²~ > ¾. 8j Æ·J"ï&æ>(Soil Pollution Assesment Index) Ö;~& . J"êæ> ï& Ö; êÖf r" ? . Kelly12). 13). Heavy metal fraction concentration in soil ∑ ∑ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pollution Division Tolerable level S.P.A.I.= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Number heavy metal. S. P. A. I. : Soil Pollution Assesment Index Heavy metal fraction concentration :. Ò;ê ï. ªCB ö²~. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003.
(4) f>7Á·Ò~ÁÒ'Áç¢Á*ç^. 56. ' ö²~ J" ª~ö V Æ· Ú tolerance level Number of heavy metal : ªCB ö²~ > * ö ~ êÖB Æ·J"6V& Ö;f ' 7 .³~ J"6V&ö ~º îÏ ê~ö & j ¢ ï ©æ Òæ~ ³ê& V&~ Æ· 7.³ö ~ J" B ©b ï& > ® . Pollution Division Tolerable level:. 3.. Ö" 5 V. ³ãæ~ z' ßW Table 3f j 7 ò~ z' ßWj ¾æÞ © . ³ãæ~ pHº 5.2~7.6b *v æ~ S Æ ·öB 5.2 ÖÒ¾¢~ "º Æ· nÏÛ, n Û, W Û, >ÂÛ, n{Û, NÛ, ÂÛ, öÛ, ËöÛ ~ 4.8~5.4f jÝ º*¢ &æ ®º £ ÖWj ¾æÚî, çÿs æ~ S Æ·öB 7.6b £ r ÒWö >º 8j ¾æî . ·N~~Ïïf 7.4~12.4 cmol(+)/kgb ¾æÒb, C î²~ ïf 0.6~2.5% öê7 æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-1öB 2.5% &Ë ¸f 8j ¾æîb çÿ7 ë² æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-3öB &Ë Ôf 8j ¾ æî . 3.1. ·N ~~Ïï Ôf ¢¦æ~ ã·æÆ·f ÖÒ ¾¢ Æ·~ ·N ~~Ïï ê 'Ú jò¢ Ú¶ ; ê ô Ï ~ê "j*ç 'j ©b ÒòB . 6 Æ·~ ãÖ Æ·ö jò¢ Ï ~ Æ·~ "V ~~Ïï ò¢ Æ·«¶ö O> ¾^æº Æ· Ïö j ® & ·bö : > Ï>¾ _f b" þ Ïî>Ú F >² >Ú 2N J"j B~V Þ ©b ÒòB . ãÖ 7Ò6öB BB 7 .³ ï ¸f ^ªê ã·æ Æ·b ÿ> jÏËK 'Ú Fê& ¸f 7.³f Æ·öB O ö ~ Fbî jÏÎ"¢ Î"'b ¾æâ > ìÚ, ;Ö¾ "æ~ãæz¢ Û J"B Æ·b¦V Ï Â>º 7.³ >¾ æ>j Û FÂ>Ú > ê ö 'Ëj * &ËW ©b ÒòB . Ignition loss~ ïf 1.9~12.9% &Öv æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-9öB &Ë ¸f 8j ¾æîb, Kÿ 7Ö æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-16öB &Ë Ôf Fï b ¾æÒb, C î²~ ïf 0.6~2.5% öê7 æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-1öB 2.5% &Ë ¸f 8j ¾æîb çÿ7ë² æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-3öB &Ë Ôf 8b ¾æÒ . ¦zêº 1.2~14.4 ¾æÚÚ ã·æ Æ· &æ ®º ßW jò¾ j~ Ú Vº ³¦ î. Table 3. Physical and chemical properties of the experimental cultivated land soils pH (1:5). CEC. cmol(+)/kg F-1 6.6 7.6 F-2 6.2 10.0 F-3 5.8 11.2 F-4 7.6 10.8 F-5 5.5 12.4 F-6 5.7 9.4 F-7 6.1 7.6 F-8 5.7 9.1 F-9 6.0 9.8 F-10 5.6 11.6 F-11 5.2 10.7 F-12 5.4 8.4 F-13 5.5 7.4 F-14 5.3 11.2 F-15 6.4 10.3 F-16 6.1 9.1 F-17 5.4 11.5 CEC; Cation exchange capacity. TOC; Total organic carbon. TKN; Total Kjeldahl nitrogen.. TKN. 2.5 1.0 0.6 1.4 2.4 2.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 2.1 1.4 1.6 1.6 2.4. Loss on Ignition ---- % ----5.9 4.0 8.7 6.9 9.3 3.2 2.8 4.0 12.9 3.8 4.6 5.3 5.9 5.8 2.6 1.9 12.4. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003. I.G./N. Humic level. Sand. Silt. Clay. Soil texture. 2.4 4.2 14.4 4.8 3.8 1.5 2.0 2.8 9.2 2.7 3.0 3.6 2.8 4.0 1.6 1.2 5.2. oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic oligohumic. 40.1 37.1 29.3 17.0 5.6 53.9 63.9 48.5 90.9 51.2 67.5 65.2 58.4 54.6 46.7 82.5 8.0. ---- % ---22.3 43.9 44.6 71.8 91.1 23.8 26.2 33.1 4.8 37.3 19.1 19.2 24.4 23.6 46.3 8.2 53.1. 37.7 19.1 26.1 11.1 3.3 22.3 9.9 18.5 4.3 11.5 13.4 15.6 17.2 21.8 7.1 9.3 39.0. Clay lom Loam Loam Silty loam Silt Sandy loam Sandy loam Loam Sand Loam Sandy loam Sandy loam Sandy loam Sandy clay loam Loam Loamy sand Silty clay loam.
(5) ö7Öæ ã·æ Æ·~ 7.³ Ò;f Æ·J"ï&. ² ïö ~ B>º *çb ÒòB . Oligohumic ç ã·æ Æ·f 7.³ FVb" ÖB ¦ª~ Ò;j& ¸ FVb ª>B ;¾ 6º b ÏW ±f N ; ÿ &ËW ©b .ç>Ú bÚö 'Ëj * ©b ÒòB . * æ~ «êº &¦ª Sandf silt~ ï ¸f loam sandy loamb ξ, Ò, 6Æ~ ï '' 8.0~90.9%, 4.8~91.1%, 3.3~39.0% ¾æÒ . 3.2. ³ãæ 7.³~ Ò;(fractionation) 5 ÿW. (mobilization). *Ò ¯> ®º ã·æ Æ·~ ªC O»f 7.³ ~ C ïòj G;~² >Ú ® . ªCO»f ã·æ Æ·ö ª~ ®º 7.³~ ÿ ;¾ Ï &ËWö & .G ÚJÚ ; . V¢B ã·æ Æ ·Ú~ 7.³~ Ò;¢ ªC~ áÚê ¶ò& z × FÏ Æ·J"~ ;¢ áj > ® ~ ® . 7.³ "6 ~ãæzöB bioavailabilityf Æ·7 ÿWö &Ë 'Ëj > ®º ;º adsorbed fraction . ¾ ã·æ Æ· ÚöB ã·æzö ~ Æ· 6VW ;¾ _f FVb ªö ~ > ²N ³ê Ã&ö ~ pH 6²f ?f · ~ãæ z& ¾æÆ > ® , V¢B ã·æ Æ·~ 7.³~ Ò; 7 carbonate¾ reducible fraction >Ͼ ~ ~ æzF &ËW ¸ . 14,15). 6). 57. æ ã·æ Æ·~ Cd Cïf &Öv æ~ ¢ Æ· ;6 F-10öB 22.3 mg/kgb &Ë ¸f ³ ê¢ ¾æîb, *v æ S Æ· ;6 F-11öB 10.2 mg/kgb &Ë Ôf 8b ¾æÒ . Cu Cïf 154.7 mg/kg~455.8 mg/kg, Pb Cïf 143.8 mg/kg~573.1 mg/kg, Ni Cïf 168.3 mg/kg~ 501.3 mg/kg, Zn Cïf 149.8 mg/kg~1334.6 mg/kg~ ª¢ ¾æÚ &¦ª Kÿ öê7 ~~ö *~ S Æ·öB &Ë ¸f ³ê¢ ¾æîb, Kÿ 7~ jv' J "ööB öÒö *~ *v æ S Æ·öB &Ë Ôf 8b ¾æÒ . ' 7.³~ Ò;ê ³êê çÿ7ë² æb 7Öÿö ~ BB J"bî~ 'Ëj Aj ©b .ç>º "ææ~ S Æ·öB &Ë ¸f 8j ¾æÚ î, jv' J"ööB fÒ *~ ¢ Æ·öB &Ë Ôf 8j ¾æî . *ö ¾æ Ö"¢ ï Æ· 7 Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn ï 0.35 mg/kg , 30.0 mg/kg , 3.0~189.0 mg/kg , 15). 15). 3.0~189.0 mg/kg16), 50.0 mg/kg(Bowen, 1979)15),. 16). 400.0 mg/. º* 60.0~2000.0 mg/kg) " jv~ &¦ª~ 7. ³öB adsorbed, carbonatef reducible fraction ¢¦ æj B * æöB 20VöB ô²º 50Vræ. Ö ¸f ïj ¾æîb, Kloke & B Æ·öB ~ Tolerance level adsorbed 5 carbonate, reducible fraction ¢¦æ" residual fractionf *æ~ ³ãæ Æ·öB £ 1V~6V;ê ç²~º 8j ¾æî, Ò kg(. 15). 17). Fig. 2. Fractional composition of cadmium (Cd) in the cultivated land soils. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003.
(6) f>7Á·Ò~ÁÒ'Áç¢Á*ç^. 58. Fig. 3. Fractional composition of copper (Cu) in the cultivated land soils.. ;~ ßWç. j B Ò; 7 organic fraction &Ë ¸f ³ê¢ ¾æîb¾, ¢ ãæ Æ·öBº reducible fraction &Ë ¸f ¦ªjNj N æ~& . ³ãæ Æ·ö FB Úf "æ~ã¾ ê ÿF > ®º labile ¦ª 12.2%~43.0% &Öv æ ¢ Æ· ;6 F-9öB ÿW &Ë ¸f ©b ¾æÒb, Kÿ ç~æö *~ çÿsÚ~ S Æ · ;6 F-4öB &Ë ÿW Ô² ¾æÒ (Fig. 2). *ö ¾æ Ö"º ¢>' Æ·öBº Æ· Ú~ Ö²& Æ· b~ ÿö ~ 6V' ç¢ Vº ÚJÚ 6j Ú Æ·Ú Ö²º «¶f «¶*~ ö B Ö²ö ~ ^VW ç¢ Fæ ©b .ç> ¾ ã·æ Æ·~ ãÖ jò~ R«" ¢ ãæ~ ãÖ ã ·~ ßWç Æ· bö ~ &V[" ¾*Úæ 6V' çj ò ² >Ú ~ö ç¢ Fæ~² >Ú. B ƾ *~ Özb" ÖB ;~ 7.³ ~ö ç >B ÖB Ú ÏÂ>Ú labile ¦ªö V . 6 FVb" ÖB Ú~ ãÖ ¦z ;êö V¢ ÿ &ËW ®j ©b Òò>Ú ã·æ Æ·~ ãÖ &¦ª~ FVbf ªF ©b Ú F Vb" ÖB Ú Gç ê¾ bÚ >& F ©b .ç>Ú ÿ &ËW ¦ªöB V . ³ãæ Æ·ö FB Ò 7 "æ~ã¾ ê ÿF > ®º labile ¦ªf 19.3%~49.3% ¾æÒ. (Fig. 3). residual fraction. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003. Kÿ 7~~ *v æf ê7 5 .³7Öÿ æ öB fÒ ÎÚ^ ®b¾ ~Â>¢ Ï~ ã·ÿ j ~&j ©b .ç>º ¢ Æ· ;6 F-12öB ÿW &Ë ¸j ©b ¾æÒ . V¢B æöB Ö>º ³·bê Ò~ ³ê& ¸j ©b Òò>, £ 84.9 mg/kg ;ê~ Ò& "æ ê ÿF ©b ÒòB . Ï~ ãÖ Ò;~ ßWç residual fractionj B Ò; 7 organic fraction &Ë ¸f ³ê ¾æÒ b¾ Kÿ ç~~ öê7~ 7ÖV>& F«>º æ~f çÿ7ë²~ 7ÖV>& F«>º æ 5 C²7ë²~ VÂ>& F«>º æ~ S Æ· 5 jv' J" B ©b .ç>º *v æ~ ¢ Æ·öB ÆÖzb 5 * Özb" ÖB Ï~ ³ê& ¸² ¾æ¾ S Æ·~ ãÖº ÖW7ÖV>& F«>º ~Â>& ³ëÏ> Ò Ï>Ú ¾æ Ö" Òò>, ¢ Æ·~ ãÖ S Æ· "º ·¦ÚêöB ¾æ Ö" ÒòB . Ï~ ÿWf ³ãæ *æ Humic level oligohumic ç ¾æ¾, Æ·Ú FVb~ ª ~ >²N ³ê çß" FVb" ÖB Ï FVb ª ê³' Ï BF ©b Òò>Ú ö 'Ëj Aj ©b .ç>º adsorbed fraction, carbonate fraction, reducible fraction 5 organic fraction ¦ª' b ÏÂF ©b .çB . ß® ¦ªf Cï~ 3.7%~36.5%¢ Næ~ 17.4 mg/kg~87.8 mg/kg~ Ï ã·æ Æ·öB erosion¾ ã·ÿö ~B "æ .
(7) ö7Öæ ã·æ Æ·~ 7.³ Ò;f Æ·J"ï&. 59. Fig. 4. Fractional composition of lead (Pb) in the cultivated land soils.. Fig. 5. Fractional composition of nickel (Ni) in the cultivated land soils.. ê ÿ &ËW ®j ©b ÒòB (Fig. 4). î.f 7.³"º Ò C²7ë²~ VÂ>& F «>º æ~ S Æ·öB carbonate fraction" residual fraction ¸f 8b ¾æÒ . *çf C²7Ö ~ ßû ¸f C²Wª~ 'Ëb ÒòB . î.~ ÿWf ³ãæ *æ Humic level oligohumic ç ¾æ¾, Æ·Ú FVb~ ª ~ >²N ³ê çß" FVb" ÖB î. FV b ª ê³' Ï BF ©b Òò>Ú . ö 'Ëj Aj ©b .ç>º adsorbed fraction, carbonate fraction, reducible fraction 5 organic fraction ¦ª'b ÏÂF ©b .çB . ß® ¦ªf Cï~ 34.7%~50.6%¢ Næ~ 37.7 mg/kg~231.2 mg/kg ~ î. ã·æ Æ·öB erosion¾ ã·ÿö ~ B "æ ê ÿ &ËW ®j ©b ÒòB. (Fig. 5).. jf Ò;~ ßWç residual fractionj B~ organic fraction &Ë ¸f ³ê ¾æÒb, ¢¦æ Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003.
(8) 60. f>7Á·Ò~ÁÒ'Áç¢Á*ç^. Fig. 6. Fractional composition of zinc (Zn) in the cultivated land soils.. ~ ¢ Æ·öBº organic fraction º redcible fraction ¸f 8j & . ß® öê7~ ÖW7ÖV> & F«>º æ~ S Æ·öBº æ"º Ò organic fraction" reducible fraction jN ç ® Ôf 8j ¾æÚ ã· ÿ "æ ~Âj Ï~ ³ã> ÒÏ>îj ©b .çB . j~ ÿWf ³ãæ *æ Humic level oligohumic ç ¾æ¾, Æ·Ú FVb~ ª ~ >²N ³ê çß" FVb" ÖB î. FVb ª ê³' Ï BF ©b Òò>Ú ö 'Ëj Aj ©b .ç>º adsorbed fraction, carbonate fraction, reducible fraction 5 organic fraction ¦ª' b Ï F ©b ÒòB . ß® ¦ªf Cï~ 7.0%~51.7%¢ Næ~ 22.8 mg/kg~610.5 mg/kg~ j ã·æ Æ·öB erosion¾ ã·ÿö ~B "æ ê ÿ &ËW ®j ©b ÒòB (Fig. 6). j~ ÿ &ËW B¢ ¸² ¾æ æf Kÿ öê7~ ÖW7ÖV>& F«>º æ~ S Æ·öB &Ë ¸² ¾æÒb, Kÿ 7Á~~ö *~ fv æ~ ¢ Æ·öB &Ë Ô² ¾æ¾ jö ~ ÒV ·b¾ "æ êö ~º 'Ëf ÖW7ÖV>¢ ³ëÏ> Ï~º Kÿê7 æ~ S Æ· B¢ ©b ÒòB . (2) 7.³ Ò;ö V J"6V& J;. æ öê7" ZÁö.³7Ö 5 7Ò6ö & Æ Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003. ·J"ö & ZÁö.³7Ö 5 ê7, öÒ¾ÒË(7Ò 6)ö & J" &ËWö & ÖF B* Ö; jº~ ö V¢ ¶ê ÖFB*¢ Ö; > ® . ÖF B*¢ Ö;~V *Bº ZÁö. ³7Ö 5 ê7, öÒ¾ÒË "æö 7.³ FÂ> Ú ~ãö Ò~º 7.³ Ú 5 ~ãö Ú¶ ;ê ~ F 'Ëj ~º&¢ 6 > ®Ú¢ . J"ï&¢ ~V * V& 7.³ö ~ J"6 V&¢ > ® . ZÁö7B 7Öæ~ J"öj B > ®º VF ' 7"O» ÚæV *~ ZÁö7B 7Öæ j &çb 7.³ö ~ J"6V& J;>Ú¢ ~ , ZÁö7B 7Öæ~ ÖFB*¢ Ö;~¢ . 7.³ö ~ J"6V&~ J;f ZÁö.³7Ö 5 ê7, öÒ¾ÒËöB VÂ>º 7.³ " Æ· 5 ~Âb FÂ>æ 7Öæ~ J"*~ 6f Æ· (³ãæ 5 j³ãæ), "~ 5 WÚ>f Â>, bÚöB~ 7.³ö ~ J";ê¢ V&b J;>Ú ¢ . ¾, ÖÒ¾¢f öB~ 7ÖæöB VÂ>º 7.³ö ~ J"6V&~ J; «{~² BB : ì . V¢B öBº '~ ~~ J"6V&j Æ& ~ Non polluted, Weakly polluted, Moderately polluted, Heavily polluted ª~~ ï&~& . Æ·J"ï&æ>º 7.³~ Ò;ê ªCB ¶ò 1).
(9) ö7Öæ ã·æ Æ·~ 7.³ Ò;f Æ·J"ï&. ¢ ' stepî ªC~¢ Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Committee Land(ICRCL) öB ¾æÞ J"6V&~ >~ ¾. ê ªCB ö² Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn~ j ö²~ > ¾. 8j Æ· J"ï&æ>(Soil Pollution Assesment Index) Ö;~& b, Æ·J" ª~º Non polluted, Weakly polluted, Moderately polluted, Heavily polluted ¾*î . Non pollutedº *' Öëÿö ~ J">æ pf Æ·b ¶ Fï º*ö B ³ê *~ ;öº 'Ëj ~æ pº 7.³~ ³ê¢ ö . Weakly pollutedº J"B Æ·b ;>¾ J"~ ;êº £ ç '~ ~~ J"Æ·ª~V& 1 ö >º º*¢ ¾æÞ . Moderately pollutedº Æ· Öë¾ ã· " ? f *' ÿö ~ ç ® J">Ú ®º ç¢ ~ ~ ~~ J"Æ·ª~V& 2ö >º º* , Heavily pollutedº Öëÿ" ?f *~ ÿö ~ Æ· j;ç'b ~² J"B ç k~ Æ·J"ç J"Æ·ª~V& 3~4ö >º º* . -² ª~B Æ·J"6V&j ã· O»¾ Æ· "æ ~ãö V¢ Ò;ö ~ ªCB 7.³~ ³ê ¢ J"Æ·ª~V&ö ~ V&j J;~& . Ò;ö V Cïö & 7.³ Æ·J"6V& f *æöB non pollutedf weakly polluted º*¢ *¦ ."~&b, moderately pollutedº çÿ7ë² æ " 7Ò6 æ~ ³ãæ ;6 F-5, F-7" C²7Ö æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-15f Kÿ ¾ê7 æb æöB BB öÒf ÖW7ÖV>~ 'Ëj A~j ©b .ç>º S Æ·" ¢ Æ· ;6 F-15, F-16, F-17öB ."~º 8b ¾æÒ . Heavily polluted¢ ç²~¾ V&ö ~º æf * ;6öB ¾æ¾æ p~ . ã·æ Æ· ³z";" ³·b~ ÒV¾ ãJö ~ ~ã 'Ëj B¢ ô Aj ©b .G>º adsorbed fraction" carbonate fraction~ labile ç Æ· J"6V&f 7Ò6 æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-7" F-8öB non polluted º*¢ ."®b¾ weakly polluted f moderately polluted, heavily pollutedº * æöB Æ·J"6V&j ç²~¾ V& 6ö ~º >~ º ¾æ¾æ p~ . ã·æ Æ· ã·ÿ 5 ~ã æzö ~ 6V' ~ ;¢ Fæ~² F r .ç>º labile ;~ 12,13). 18). 12,13). 12,13). 61. Æ·J"6V&f Kÿ ç~ö *~ öê7æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-1" Kÿ 7Á~~æb jv' ê7¾ .³7Ö~ 'Ë 'j ©b .ç>º &Ö v æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-9f *v æ~ S" ¢ Æ· ;6 F-11 5 F-12, fv æ~ S Æ· ; 6 F-13j B *æöB non polluted º*¢ ." ~&b, weakly polluted 5 moderately polluted, heavily pollutedº Kÿ "ææ~ ³ãæöB Æ·J "6V&j ç²~¾ V& 6ö >º æ * ;6öB ¾æ¾æ p~ . Æ·~ FVb~ ª ~ ÿW &7F ©b .ç>º labile ;~ Æ·J"6V&f Kÿ ç~ö *~ ö ê7æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-1j B *æöB non polluted º*¢ ."~&b, weakly pollutedº C²7Ö BW 7 æ~ S Æ· ;6 F-15f Kÿ öê7 æb æöB B B öÒf ÖW7ÖV>~ 'Ëj A~j ©b .ç> º S Æ·" ¢ Æ· ;6 F-15, F-16öB ."~º 8b ¾æÒ . ¾ moderately pollutedf heavily pollutedº Æ·J"6V& ~ ¾æÒ . *f ?f Ö"º Ò;öB ªCB Cïö & 7.³~ Æ· J"6V& ³ãæ ~ã~ 'Ëj Aj ©b .ç >º Ò;~ ' ¦ª~ V&>~ ç&'b Ï Â >¾ ê~ ÿb êö J"bî ~ »' _f ~«' F¢ "² F ©b Òò>º ³ê ¸² ï&> ® . ï& ç~ >~ º J"B æj z' O»ö ~ ö O» Æ· ~ ®Ïz Æ·~ ~öz /ê(Eh~ &~)¾ Æ·~ pH çß(precipitation) 6º Ö" ~ W/ê " Ozö Ï~º 6Æ7bÒò~ Ï _f Æ·BïÒ ò~ Ï" Æ·Ú B 7.³~ Ïî O» Æ·^ ;ö ~ B(washing)f b' O» 7.³j F 'b >~º b~ Ï(Phytoremediation) " ³ ëÆÏ'O» >*ã, CÆ, VÆ, VÆCÆ " ? f O»ö '.® ö Onj B~V Ú[¾ æ¾ ¸f Æ·J"6V& B ~ B>º ãB' ^B¾ ~ã ^B& jºçb ¾æ¾² F ©b Ò òB . V¢B ã·æ~ Æ·~ ßW¾ ã·O»ö V ¢ Æ·J"6V& Ö; O»ö N¢ vÚ¢ ©b ÒòB . Æ·ö B 7.³(Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) Ò;ê ³êö ~ Ö;B ÿ&ËW ®º adsorbed fraction, carbonate fraction" reducible fraction, organic fraction~ 19). Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003.
(10) f>7Á·Ò~ÁÒ'Áç¢Á*ç^. 62. Table 4. Pollution division level of metal fraction in cultivated land soils. Total. A+C. A+C+R. Pollution division level 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 F-1 9.4 3.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 F-2 8.6 3.4 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.4 F-3 9.8 3.9 1.0 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.5 F-4 9.3 3.6 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.4 F-5 9.7 3.8 1.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.5 F-6 9.0 3.5 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.5 F-7 9.6 3.7 1.0 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.5 F-8 9.1 3.5 0.9 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.5 F-9 6.9 2.7 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.2 F-10 9.3 3.5 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.5 F-11 6.5 2.5 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.3 F-12 8.5 3.2 0.8 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.3 F-13 6.5 2.5 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.3 F-14 5.5 2.2 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.4 F-15 10.5 4.2 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.5 F-16 10.2 4.1 1.0 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.4 F-17 10.5 4.1 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.3 0.8 A+C; Sum of adsorbed + carbonate. A+C+R; Sum of adsorbed + carbonate + reducible. A+C+R+O; Sum of adsorbed + carbonate + reducible + organic. 1; Non polluted, 2; Weakly polluted, 3; Moderately polluted, 4; Heavily polluted.. A+C+R+O. Site. ³êö & J"ï& æ>º Table 4ö vî . 4.. Ö . öBº Kÿ F ã·æ¢ &çb "æ ZÁö.³7ÖöB BB öÒö ~ 7.³ö & J"ê¢ ï&~V * ³ºÂ»j Û ã·æ Æ· 7 7.³~ Ò; ªCj >¯~&, Ö"¢ Ï~ Æ·J"ï&æ>(SPAI)¢ ÖÂ~& . Ö"º. r" ? . 1. ã·æ Æ·~ pHº &¦ª £ÖWb ¾æÒb ¾ .³7Öæ~ S Æ·öBº æ Æ·Û"º Ò rÒWb ¾æÒ . 2. Ò¢ B 7.³ &¦ª ZÁö .³7Öæ ~ ã·æ º ÖW7ÖV>~ F «ï ôf öê 7æöB ¸f ³ê¢ &b, Ò;ª~ö ~ ÿ &ËWê ¸² ¾æ¾ æ~ ·bÚ Ú~ 7. ³ Fï ¸j ©b 6>î . 3. Òæ Ú ã·æ~ Ò;ê J"ï&V&f * ;6öBnon polluted º*¢ ." ~&b, Kÿ öê7 5 BW 7 C²7Ö æöB moderately pollutedj ç²~ ¾ V& 6ö >º 8j ¾æÚÚ æ ÖF'b ã·æ ö On Ú ^¢ ©b Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003. 3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2. 4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1. 1 0.8 1.9 2.4 2.0 2.6 2.1 2.1 2.4 1.8 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.8 1.6 3.4 3.5 3.8. 2 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.4. 3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5. 4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1. 6B . 4. Cïö & Æ·J"6V& ³ãæ ~ã~ ' Ëj Aj ©b .ç>º Ò; ~ ' ¦ª~ V& >~ ¸² ï&> ® . V¢B ã·æ~ Æ·~ ß W¾ ã· O»ö V¢ Æ·J"6V& Ö; O»ö N¢ vÚ¢ ©b 6B .. ^^ò 1. Park, Y.A. “Designing and applicability of soil pollution indices for estimating quality of soil polluted with heavy metals and arsenic”, J. of KOSES, 1(1), 47-54 (1996). 2. Forstner, U. and Salomon, W., Mobilization of metals from sediments, Metals and Their compound in environment, Ed. by E, Merian, pp. 379-398 (1991). 3. Jung, M.C., Heavy metal contamination of soil, plants, waters and sediments in the vicinity of metalliferous mine in Korea, Ph.D thesis, University of London, p. 455 (1995). 4. Sengupta, M. “Environmental impacts of mine drainage on streams of United States”. Env. Geol. Water Sci., 11, pp. 141-152 (1993). 5. Davis, J.A. and Leckie, J.O. “Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 67, pp. 90-107 (1978). 6. Tessier, A., P.G.C. Campbell, and M. Bisson. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace.
(11) ö7Öæ ã·æ Æ·~ 7.³ Ò;f Æ·J"ï& metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51(7), pp. 844-851 (1979). 7. Park, Y.A. “Distribution and transportation of fine-grained sediments on the innercontinental shelf off the Kuem river estuary”, Korea, J. of Geo. Soc. of Korea, 20(2), pp. 154168 (1984). 8. Shepard, F.P. “Nomenclature Based on sand-silt-clay ratios”, J. Sed. Pet., 24, pp. 151-158 (1954). 9. Folk, R. L. “A Review of grain-size Parameters”, Sedimentology, 6, pp. 73-93 (1966) 10. Gaudette, H.E. and Flight, W.R. “Inexpensive titration of organic carbon in recent sediment”, J. Sed. Petro., 44, pp. 24-253 (1974). 11. Hakanson, L. and M. Jansson, Principles of lake sedimentology. Springer -Verlag, Berlin, 316p (1983). 12. Kelly, R. T., Site investigation and material problems, in Reclamation of Contaminated Land. B2/1-B2/12. Society of Chemical Industry (1980). 13. Hobson, M., Rational site investigation. In: Contaminated Land problems and solutions. Ed. T. Cairney. Blackie Aca-. 63. demic & Professional, Chapman & Hall Press (1993). 14. Alloway, B. J., Soil processes and the behavior of metals, In “Heavy metals in soils (Alloway, B. J. (ed))” : Blackie and Son, pp. 7-28 (1990). 15. Bowen, H.J.M. Environmental chemistry of the elements, Academic press, London (1979). 16. Istvan, P. and Jones Jr. Trace elements, CRC., Lucie Press (1997). 17. Kloke, A. Content of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, fluorine, lead, mercury, nikel in plants grown on contaminated soil: UN-ECE Symp (1979). 18. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and management of contaminated sites, National Health and Medical Research Council. (1992). 19. Kim, S.H. and H.T. Jun, Contamination of heavy metals in soils and stream sediments in the vicinity of the sambo PbZn-Barite mine, Econ. Environ. Geol., 26, 271-226 (1993).. Journal of KoSSGE Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 53~63, 2003.
(12)
관련 문서
04이주현(1037~1051)ok qxp 원격36 5 3 2020 2020 11 5 오전 9 04 페이지 1037 Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol 36, No 5 3, 2020, pp 1037~1051 https //doi org/10 7780/kjrs 2020 36
Procedure for application of stabilizing agents in As-contaminated soil at the forest area near the former Janghang smelter
This study evaluated natural attenuation processes of TCE at an industrial site in Korea by delineating hydrogeochemical characteristics along the flow path of contaminated
This study evaluated the applicability of stabilization of arsenic (As)-contaminated soil with iron (Fe) oxides at the former Janghang smelter site.. Three Fe oxides
NEPC National Environment Protection Council, 2011b, Assessment site contamination-Schedule B5b: methodology to derive ecological investigation levels in contaminated soil..
제련소 주변 비소오염토양의 이화학적 특성평가. The Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Arsenic-Contaminated Soil in beneath of the
Rock cells orientation of cell and joint, characteristics of joint, RQD, strength of rock, groundwater conditions, weathering grade Soil cells orientation of cell, Depth of
가톨릭대학교 생명공학부 환경공학전공 Geochemical Characteristics of Soil Solution from the Soil Near Mine Tailing Dumps and the Contamination Assessment in Duckum Mine
