• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

(Big Data

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "(Big Data"

Copied!
30
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

. . 1.

2.

3.

. 1.

2.

3.

4.

. ( )

1. ( )

2.

V.

* ,

: 2014. 5. 30. / : 2014. 6. 20. / : 2014. 6. 25.

(2)

.

(George

Orwell) 1984

‘ (Big Brother)’ .

.

,

.

- -

. 1990

(Information Overload) (Information Explosion)

.

, .1) ,

,

.

,

2) .3) ,

1) , (Big Data) , 2013

, 229 .

2) IT Gartner ‘21

(3)

, ,

.4)

,

.

, .5) ,

, 6) .7)

,

.8)

.

3) , ‘ (Big Data)’ , 51

(2012), 29 .

4) , , 25 10 (2013), 37 .

5) , , 14 2 (2013), 11 .

6) OECD 8

, ,

, , , , ,

. ,

, Internet and Information Security(IIS) 3 3 (2012), 96 .

7) , (Big Data) , IT 8 (2014), 196 .

8) , (Big Data) , 27

(2014), 126 .

(4)

.

.

.

.

.

(Big Data)

, .

,

. , ,

.

.9)10)

9) , , 21 2

(2013), 310 .

10) ,

,

. ,

( ), 2011.

(5)

(volume), (velocity), (variety), (complexity)

(structured data)11), (semi-structured data)12) (unstructured data)13)

.14) ,

,

.

(Volume), (Velocity),

(Variety) . ‘ ’

, ‘ ’

,

. ‘ ’

.15) 3Vs

. (Oracle)

(Value) . ,

11) ,

. , ,

27 (2014), 159 . 12)

XML HTMN .

13) , ,

, .

14) , , 198 .

15) , , 159 .

(6)

. (Gartner)

3Vs 2 (Complexity)

, (Forrester)

(Variability) .16)

, ,

.

.17)

(McKinsey & Company) 5

, , ,

.18)

,

.

.

,

.

16) , , 313 .

17) , , Issue Report(2012),

10-13 .

18) , , 8 .

(7)

, , ,

.19) .20)

( , KT)

A . 12

, ,

. .

. .

( , BC , )

B

.

.

. ,

, .

19) , , 62 .

20) , .... 2013 ,

(2013. 12. 19)

(8)

3 .21)

. , , ,

, RFID

. .

, .

.

,

.

< 1> 22)

21) , , 33 .

22) , , 68 .

(9)

/ ,

,

3

,

,

,

.

.

( ‘ ’

), ( ‘ ’

), ( ‘ ’

) . ,

,

.

(10)

.

.23)

/ /

. 6 (

) “

” . ,

,

.

24) 25),

23) , , 138 .

24)

, , .( 2 5 )

25) 3 ( )

.

, .

, .

.

, .

.

.

.

(11)

26) , ,

, (

. ) , ,

· ,

( 4 ) 27)

. , 15 ( ), 17

( ), 18 ( ), 19 (

), 22 ( )

( Opt-in ) .

, ,

.

‘ ’ 28)

. ,

· , ,

26)

.( 2 3 )

27)

. 99 513

17 , 10

, 2003 282 10 17

. , ,

12 2 (2013), 153 .

28) 2 8

.( 2 3 )

(12)

· .( 22

1 ) ,

· ,

,

· .( 22 2 )

·

· ,

,

3 ,

· ·

.( 30 1 2 )

.

, , , , ,

. , 17 ( )29)

18 ( )30) 20 (

)31), 13 ( )32),

29) 17 ( ) ·

·

30) 18 ( )

· .

31) 20 ( ) ,

.

(13)

8 ( )33) 9 (

34) )35)

.

, , ,

.

, PC ,

,

.

,

32) 13 ( ) 3 1

.

33) 8 ( )

.

·

( " " )

.

34) ·

.( 2 2 )

35) 9 ( ) · · ·

· · · .

· , ,

, .

36) 2013 7 30 11956 , 2013 10 31 .

(14)

,

.

.

,

.

,

.38)

.

,

.

.

37)

.

38) , , 162-163 .

(15)

,

,

.39)

( )

,

.40)

.

2 1 “ ,

(

) ” . ‘

’ 2 1 6 “

(

) ” , ‘ ’ 2 2 “

(

) ” .

41)’ , ‘

39) , , 161 .

40) , ( ) , 19 1

(2013), 22 41)

(16)

’ .42)

,

. ,

.

,

‘ ’ .43)

, .

, .

, .44)

.

42) , , 42 3 (2014),

56 . . “

,

. ,

. ,

.”

43) , , 163 .

44) , , 58-59 .

(‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ 4 ’)

(17)

< > 45)

, , , , ,

, , , ,

,

, ,

, , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

, , ,

, , ,

, ,

( ) , ,

, , ,

, , ,

,

, , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

, ,

, , ,

,

, , ,

, , , ,

,

45) , - - , (2012), 161 .

(18)

( Opt-in ) .

,

.

,46) ,

,

. (Opt-in

Opt-out) .

,

,

.47)

46)

, , ,

3

, , ,

(

) ,

.( 15 1 )

47) , , 164 .

(19)

PC

,

.48)

,

( ) .49)

,

50)

.

, EU 2012 (a Proposal for General Data Protection

Regulation of 2012 in the EU) ‘ ’ “

,

” .51) ,

‘ ’

48) , , (2011), 1

49) , , 6 1 (2013), 155 .

50) , , 73-74 .

51) , , 159 .

(20)

.52)

.

.

.

3

.53)

.

.

.

52) , , 148 .

53) , , 161 .

(21)

.

.54)

.

.

.

.

.

. ( )

,

.( 1 )

54) , , 25 2 (2013), 200 .

55) (2014. 6. 16.

) - ( )

. ( )

.

(22)

( : SNS , )

,

,

( : , ,

) “ ” .

“ ”

( : ,

, ) .( 2 )

.

, ,

,

, , ,

.( 3 )

(23)

,

. ,

.

, ,

,

.( 4 )

, ,

· ·

.

.( 5 )

.

(24)

( 10 ).

, , ( “

” ) ,

( 6 ), · , · · ,

, , ,

, ( 8 ).

,

,

, .( 9 )

12 ( )

‘ ’,

.

. ,

.

.

. .

.

(25)

.

,

.

,

, (

)

. ,

(Opt-in) Opt-out

.

.

, ,

· ·

. · ·

. .

‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’

.

(26)

( )

( ) ,

.

, .56)

.

.

, , , ,

.

, ‘ ’

‘ ’

.57)

.

.

.

56) , , 143 .

57) , , 237 .

(27)

. -

.

.

. ,

58)

.

, ‘ ’

‘ ’ ‘ ’

.59)

, ,

,

.

58) , , 43 .

59) , , 180 .

(28)

, ‘ (Big Data)’ , 51 , 2012

, (Big Data) ,

2013,

, , 25 10 ,

2013

, , 14 2 , 2013

, (Big Data) , IT 8

, 2014

, (Big Data) ,

27 , 2014

, , 25 2 , 2013

, ,

21 2 , 2013

, , 27 , 2014

, , Internet

and Information Security(IIS) 3 3 , 2012

, , Issue

Report, 2012

, , 12 2 ,

2013

, ( ) , 19

1 , 2013

, , 42 3 , 2014

, - - , 2012

, ( ), 2011

(29)

< >

. 1990

(Information Overload) (Information Explosion)

.

.

.

.

,

. ,

.

, .

.

.

.

(30)

Journal of Legislation Research / 46th Issue

Big Data and Personal Information Protection

Kim, Ji-Hoon*60)

The amount of data in our world has been exploding. Big data is now part of every sector and function of the global economy. Big Data provide positive aspects such as efficiency, convenience and new utility creation. However Big Data bring about various new problem such as infringement on privacy.

Big Data, which arises as new growth power, contributes to promote public interest or to reinforce competitive power of industry. It is fully expected that using Big Data will become more popular within next years. There has been a great deal of effort to utilize Big Data around the World and South Korea is not an exception.

Such an aspect reveals the start of a new ICT environment as well as new social issues. It will be reasonable to state that the global internet industry concentrates on the new ICT environment where a large amount of data mass-produced from human digital activities are newly processed and commercialized. In line with the start of this big data environment, currently, there are large-scale discourses to revise the personal data protection policies.

As commercial companies using Big Data, one of the most common legal issues will be customers’ privacy and protection of personal information. More specifically, companies accumulate the consumer’s purchase history data which allows the companies to advertise and recommend certain products to those customers. In this case, one of the legal issues that could be raised is whether this type of data or information can be considered as a personal information so that the customers can be protected by a privacy protection act or not.

The scope of the current study is limited to utilization of Big Data by commercial companies and privacy or personal information protection.

* Research Fellow of KLRI(Korea Legislation Research Institute)

참조

관련 문서

Business firms use big data to deal with customers’ needs and behavior patterns, develop unique core competencies, and create innovative products or services, whereas governments

However, collecting health data may lead to privacy issues since the data is personal, and can reveal sensitive insights about the individual.. We leverage

The results of this study showed that the analysis of semi-formal big data through newspaper articles is effective in deriving the differentiated policy

Also, in order to analyze the relationship among the factors such as the concern of information privacy, trust, intention to offer the personal information,

However, the data has some features distinguished from other areas of data, classification as sensitive information and legal problem such as personal information protection..

By employing the event study methodologies, we measure the actual abnormal returns of companies triggered by the an- nouncement of investing big data during the 3 years

Abstract This research describes strategies to promote the growth of the Big Data industry and the companies within the ecosystem. In doing so, we identify the

Second, the divergent landscape of national standards for personal data and privacy protection across the globe has not yet been under academic scrutiny, as