• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Experimental Study for Wave Reflection of Partially Perforated Caisson by Slit Shape of Front Wall

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Experimental Study for Wave Reflection of Partially Perforated Caisson by Slit Shape of Front Wall"

Copied!
8
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Received May 21 2013, Revised May 28 2013, Accepted May 30 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵ǤͶǤͳͶͷͷ

™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

⌾⍂#Ⳟኳ㒾ⴲ⡦ⴖ#Volw#㯓♿⮎#᫮ἶ#⇖♪㡷⛯#⢢㮖

ଲஂ଴

Lee, Jong-In*

Experimental Study for Wave Reflection of Partially Perforated Caisson by Slit Shape of Front Wall

ABSTRACT

This study examines the reflection of a partially perforated wall with single chamber by 2D and 3D hydraulic experiments. The effects of slit shape on the front wall, relative chamber width and wave steepness were discussed. For the normal incident wave condition, the reflections of horizontal slit case were lower than that of the vertical slit with the similar porosity, but the differences are not significant.

When the wave steepness is relatively small, the reflection coefficients are large. In the oblique incidence, the normalized wave heights along a perforated wall with similar porosity are almost same for the vertical and horizontal slit walls and therefore the difference by slit shape can be ignored.

Key words : Hydraulic experiment, Partially perforated caisson, Slit shape, Relative chamber width, Porosity

Ⅹಾ

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ, ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎, ❭⩶Ğᔍ॒ᨱ঑ෙᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᗭ❭✚ᖒᮥ2₉ᬱၰ3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᮥ☖⧕Łₑ⦹ᩡ݅. ❭௲ᯕḢb ᮝಽ᯦ᔍ⦹۵Ğᬑ, ᮁᔍ⦽ᮁŖᮉ᳑Õᨱᕽ⬂slitᯕ᳦slitᨱእ⧕ၹᔍĥᙹa᧞e᯲íĥ⊂ࡹᨩᮝӹə₉ᯕ۵Ⓧḡᦫᦹ݅. əญŁ❭⩶Ğ ᔍaⓑĞᬑa᯲ᮡĞᬑᨱእ⧕᧞eԏᮡၹᔍĥᙹෝᅕᩡ݅. Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭᳑ÕᨱᕽࠥᮁŖᮉᯕᮁᔍ⧁Ğᬑ, ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙᱽℕᱥ໕᮹

❭Ł₉ᯕ۵Ñ᮹ၽᔾ⦹ḡᦫᦹ݅.

áᔪᨕ ᙹญᝅ⨹, ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ, ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ, ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎, ᮁŖᮉ

1. ᕽು

ᖁၶ᮹ݡ⩶⪵॒ᮝಽᯙ⧕⧎อǍ᳑ྜྷ᮹ÕᖅᙹᝍᯕʫᨕḡŁᖅĥ❭Ła᷾ݡࢉᨱ঑௝Ğᱽᖒၰᦩᱶᖒ॒᮹⪶ᅕ⊂໕ᨱᕽ

Ğᔍ᜾Ǎ᳑ྜྷ ᅕ݅۵ Ḣพ᜾Ǎ᳑ྜྷᯕ ᖁ⪙ࡹ۵ Ğ⨆ᯕ݅. Ḣพ᜾Ǎ᳑ྜྷ ⩶᜾ ᵲ ᮁŖᇡෝ ᖅ⊹⦽ ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᮡ Ğᱽᖒ ⊂໕ᨱᕽ۵

ྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉᨱእ⧕݅ᗭᇩญ⦽⊂໕ᯕᯩḡอ, ⬉ᬊᖒ⊂໕ᨱᕽ۵ᬑᙹ⦹݅Ł⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ঑௝ᕽݡ⩶⧎อǍ᳑ྜྷᯙĞᬑᨱ᫙Ş᜽ᖅŝ

ᱲᦩ᜽ᖅ॒ᨱᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ(ᮁŖ1ᝅੱ۵ᮁŖ2ᝅ)᮹ᱢᬊᯕ᷾a⦹Łᯩ۵⇵ᖙᯕ݅. ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᮡⓍíᱥ໕ᄞ᮹ᔢ݉ᇡ░⦹݉ʭḡ

ᱥℕa ᮁŖᇡಽ Ǎᖒࡽ ᱥ໕ ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ(fully perforated caisson)ŝ ᱶᙹ໕ᮥ ʑᵡᮝಽ ᔢ·⦹ᇡ ᯝᇡǍeᨱอ ᮁŖᇡෝ ᖅ⊹⦹۵

ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ(partially perforated caisson)ᮝಽǍᇥ⧁ᙹᯩᮝ໑, ᝅᱽᖅĥ · Õᖅ᜽ᨱ۵ᦩᱶᖒၰĞᱽᖒ⊂໕॒ᨱᕽᮁญ⦽

ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᯕݡᇡᇥᱢᬊࡹŁᯩ۵ᝅᱶᯕ݅. ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉႊ❭ᱽ᮹ᰆᱱᵲ᮹⦹ӹಽ۵Ḣพ᜾⩶┽᮹݉໕ᯕ໕ᕽᮁŖᇡᨱ᮹⦽

ᗭ❭⬉ŝಽᯙ⧕ᔢݡᱢᮝಽԏᮡၹᔍĥᙹෝᅕᯙ݅۵äᯕ໑, ᯕ۵❭௲ᯕᮁŖᇡෝ☖ŝ⦹໕ᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ᙹࢱᗱᝅŝᮁᙹᝅԕᨱᕽ᮹

३؋ф२χėॡ

‘ƒ•–ƒŽƒ† ƒ”„‘—”‰‹‡‡”‹‰

(2)

⇵aᱢᯙᨱթḡqᙁ॒ᨱʑᯙ⦽݅. ԏᮡၹᔍᮉᮡǍ᳑ྜྷᱥ໕ᇡ ᮹❭Łෝᱡq᜽┕ᮝಽᯙ⧕ᖁၶ᮹⧎⧪ၰᱲᦩ, ᖁ݉ᇡ᮹ᦩᱶᖒ

⪶ᅕ⊂໕॒ᨱᕽᮁญ⦹݅⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ʑ᳕ᩑǍᨱ᮹⦹໕ᮁŖ⍡ᯕ ᜉᨱ᯲ᬊ⦹۵❭ಆၰၹᔍᮉ॒ᨱᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⊹۵᫵ᗭಽ۵ᮁŖᮉ,

ᮁᙹᝅᙹ, ᮁᙹᝅ⡎, ᮁŖᄞ᮹ࢱ̹, ݡᔢᙹᝍ, ❭௲ᱽᬱ॒ᯕ໑, ᖅĥ᜽ᨱ۵᳑₉, slit ᔢ · ⦹݉Ł, ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ॒ᮥ⇵aಽŁಅ⦹

í ࡽ݅.

ᮁŖႊ❭ᱽ۵Jarlan(1961)ᨱ᮹⧕⃹ᮭᱽᦩࡹᨩᮝ໑, Jarlan

⩶ႊ❭ᱽ۵ᮁŖ⩶ᱥ໕ᄞŝྕŖ⩶⬥໕ᄞᮝಽǍᖒࡽ݅. Jarlan ᨱ᮹⧕ᱽᦩࡽᮁŖႊ❭ᱽ۵࠺ᩎ⦺ᱢ⬉ᮉ⨆ᔢ, ᦩᱶᖒ⪶ᅕ

ၰ ⍡ᯕᜉ ᱡ໕ᇡ᮹ ᖙǕ ᱡq ॒ᮥ ༊ᱢᮝಽ ݅᧲⦽ ᩑǍa

ḥ⧪ࡹᨕ᪵݅. Fugazza and Natale(1992)ᮡ݅ᵲᮁᙹᝅ᮹ᮁŖ

⍡ᯕᜉႊ❭ᱽᨱݡ⦽ၹᔍᮉᔑᱶ᜾ᮥᮁࠥ⦹Ł, Ƚ⊺❭ෝᱢᬊ

⦹ᩍᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎(relative chamber width)ᯕ0.25ᯙ᳑Õᨱᕽ

↽ᗭၹᔍᮉᯕӹ┡ԉᮥᅕᩡ݅. Suh and Park(1995)ᮡGalerkin Łᮁ⧉ᙹჶᮥ ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ ᔍᕾ ษᬕऽ ᭥ᨱ ᭥⊹⦽ ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ

ႊ❭ᱽᨱᯝᱶbࠥಽ᯦ᔍ⦹۵❭ᨱݡ⦽ၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥᩑǍ⦹ᩡᮝ ໑, ⧕ᕾđŝ۵ᙹญ༉⩶ᝅ⨹đŝ᪡እƱ⦹ᩡ݅. Williams et al.(2000)ᮡᮁŖ1ᝅŝᮁŖ2ᝅ, ᱥ໕ᄞᯕᮁŖ⩶ੱ۵slit⩶ᯙ

ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉႊ❭ᱽᨱݡ⦽eఖ⧕ᕾ⧕ෝᖁ⩶❭ᯕುᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍ

ᮁࠥ⦹ᩡ݅. ǎԕᩑǍಽᕽ⠙᳦ɝ(1980)ᮡᔝᵲᮁŖᄞ᜾⍡ᯕᜉ

ႊ❭ᱽ᪡Jarlan⩶ᨱݡ⦹ᩍbb᮹ᮁŖᄞᨱ᯲ᬊ⦹۵❭ಆᨱ

ݡ⦽ ᝅ⨹ᮥ ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ❭ಆ᮹ Ⓧʑ۵ ᵝʑᅕ݅۵ ❭Ł᮹

ᩢ⨆ᮥฯᯕၼŁ, ᮁŖeᄞᅕ݅۵ᱥ໕ᄞŝ⬥໕ᄞᨱᕽ❭ಆᯕ

Ⓧí᯲ᬊ⧉ᮥᅕᩡ݅. ੱ⦽ᱥ໕ᄞ᮹ᮁŖᮉᯕ᯲Ł, ᯦ᔍ❭᮹

❭⩶Ğᔍa⍅ḩᙹಾᱥ໕ᄞᨱ᯲ᬊ⦹۵❭ಆ᮹Ⓧʑa᷾a⧉ᮥ

ၾ⩵݅.

ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᗭ❭✚ᖒᨱš⦽ʑ᳕ᩑǍॅᮡᮁŖᇡᨱ᮹⦽

ᨱթḡqᙁ, ᱢᱶᮁŖᮉၰᮁᙹᝅ⡎᮹đᱶᨱ᫵Ǎࡹ۵ᯱഭ᮹

ࠥ⇽ᨱᵲᱱᮥࢱᨩ݅. ᇩȽ⊺❭ෝᱢᬊ⦽ʑ᳕ᩑǍॅᨱ᮹⦹໕

ᮁŖ1ᝅᯙĞᬑᨱᱢᱶᮁŖᮉ(porosity)ᮡ᧞30%ᯕŁ, ᔢݡᮁ

ᙹᝅ⡎ᮡ0.1~0.15aᱢᱶ⦽äᮝಽá☁ࡹᨩ݅. ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕ ᜉ᮹ĞᬑᨱǍ᳑ྜྷᔢᇡ۵ᔢ⊹⎹Ⓧญ✙ᖅ⊹॒ᮝಽᯙ⧕ᮁŖ ᇡ ᔢ݉᮹ ׳ᯕ۵ ᱽ⦽ᯕ ࡹʑ ভྙᨱ ᩑǍ ॒ᮥ ☖⧕ ᱢᱶ

ᔢ݉Łෝᱽ᜽⦹޵௝ࠥᝅྕᨱᱢᬊ⦹۵ߑᯩᨕᕽ۵ᱽ᧞ᯕ঑ෝ

ᙹ ᯩ݅. ᱽ᧞ᯕᔢݡᱢᮝಽ ԏᮡ ᱢᱶᮁŖᇡ ⦹݉Łᨱ ݡ⦽

ᩑǍࠥ ၙḥ⦽ ᝅᱶᯕ໑, ᯕᨱ ݡ⦽ ǎԕ ᩑǍಽᕽ Kim and Lee(2013)ෝॅᙹᯩ݅. Kim and Lee᮹ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᙹญᝅ⨹ᮥ

☖⧕ᇡᇥᮁŖǍ᳑ྜྷ᮹⦹݉Ł۵᯦ᔍ❭Ł᮹2~3႑aᱢᱶ⧉ᮥ

ᅕᩡ݅.

ᱥᚁ⦽ʑ᳕ᩑǍ᮹ݡᇡᇥᮡ❭௲ᯕǍ᳑ྜྷᨱḢbᮝಽ᯦ᔍ⦹

۵᳑ÕᨱᕽᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᙹญ⦺ᱢ✚ᖒᮥ᭥ᵝಽá☁⦽äᯕ໑,

Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ᨱݡ⦽ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᗭ❭✚ᖒᨱݡ⦽ᩑǍ۵ᔢݡᱢ ᮝಽ ၙၙ⦽ ᝅᱶᯕ݅. Li et al.(2003)ᮡ 2ᵲ ᮁᙹᝅ ᳑Õᨱᕽ

᯦ᔍbᨱ঑ෙၹᔍĥᙹෝeigenfunction expansion methodෝ

ᯕᬊ⦹ᩍá☁⦹ᩡᮝ໑, Liu et al.(2007)ᮡᖁ⩶⡍▱ᖽᯕು(linear potential theory)ᮥᯕᬊ⦹ᩍᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᨱ❭௲ᯕĞᔍḡí᯦ᔍ

⦹۵ Ğᬑᨱ ݡ⦽ ᮁᙹᝅ ԕᇡ᪡ ᫙ᇡ᮹ ❭Łᇥ⡍ෝ Ƚ⊺❭ෝ

ᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ á☁⦹ᩡᮝӹ, ᙹญᝅ⨹đŝ ॒ŝ᮹ እƱ۵ ᙹ⧪⦹ḡ

ᦫᦹ݅. Liu et al.(2009)ᮡĞᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ᨱݡ⦽ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ၹᔍ ĥᙹෝȽ⊺❭ෝᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ⧕ᕾ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯦ᔍbᯕ᷾a(Ḣb᯦ᔍ ᮹ Ğᬑᨱ 0°)⧁ᙹಾ ၹᔍĥᙹa ᷾a⧉ᮥ ᅕᩡ݅.

ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ ᗭ❭✚ᖒᨱݡ⦽݅᧲⦽ᩑǍaᙹ⧪ࡹᨩḡอ,

ᮁŖᇡ᮹⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙá☁۵ᔢݡᱢᮝಽၙ⯂⦽ᝅᱶᯕ݅. ঑௝ᕽ

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᮁŖᇡ᮹⩶ᔢ(᳦slitŝ⬂slit)ᨱ঑ෙၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥ

Ḣb᯦ᔍ❭ၰĞᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ෝݡᔢᮝಽᝅ⨹ᱢᮝಽá☁⦹ᩡ݅.

Ḣb᯦ᔍ❭᳑Õᨱᕽ۵bᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢᄥಽ3}᮹ᮁŖᮉᮥᱢᬊ⦹

ᩍᮁŖᮉ, ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢၰ❭⩶Ğᔍᨱ঑ෙၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹ᩡ݅.

əญŁĞᔍ᯦ᔍ❭᳑ÕᨱᕽྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉŝᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᮥݡᔢᮝ ಽ ᯦ᔍb, ᮁŖᇡ᮹ ⩶ᔢ, ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ ⡎ᨱ ঑ෙ ᱽℕ ᱥ໕᮹

❭Łᇥ⡍ෝ እƱ á☁⦹ᩡ݅.

2. ᙹญᝅ⨹

2.1 ਓ෠ਏডࢫਓ෠ୋण

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ, ᮁŖᮉŝᔢݡᮁ

ᙹᝅ⡎ᨱ঑ෙၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹ʑ᭥⧕2₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ

݅. 2₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᮡFig. 1(a)ᨱࠥ᜽ࡽᙹಽෝᯕᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᝅ⨹ᙹ ಽ۵ʙᯕ56m, ׳ᯕ2m, ⡎1mᯕŁ, ᱥʑᕽᅕ⦝ᜅ★᜾᳑❭ʑa

ᖅ⊹ࡹᨕᯩ݅. ᅙᝅ⨹ᙹಽ۵Ƚ⊺❭ၰᇩȽ⊺❭ෝ᳑❭⧁ᙹ

ᯩᮝ໑, ᙹಽ ԕᨱᕽ Ǎ᳑ྜྷ ᖅ⊹ಽ ᯙ⦽ ၹᔍ❭᪡ ᳑❭❱ᨱᕽ

ၽᔾ⦹۵ ᰍၹᔍ❭ෝ⬉ŝᱢᮝಽ ᱽᨕ⦹ʑ ᭥⧕ ᙹಽ ⡎ 1mෝ

⡎0.6m᪡⡎0.4mಽᇥ⧁⦹ᩡ݅. ᇥ⧁ࡽᙹಽᨱᕽᝅ⨹༉⩶ᮡ

⡎ 0.6m᮹ᙹಽᨱ ᖅ⊹⦹ᩍ ᱽၹ ᯱഭෝ ≉ा⦹Ł, ⡎0.4m᮹

ᙹಽᨱᕽ۵ ᯦ᔍ❭᮹ ᖅᱶ ၰ ᅕᱶᮥ ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅.

ੱ⦽Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ᨱ᮹⦽ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹

ʑ᭥⧕3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. 3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱᔍᬊࡽ᳑❭ʑ۵

݅ႊ⨆ᇩȽ⊺❭᳑❭ʑಽᕽȽ⊺❭, ᯝႊ⨆ᇩȽ⊺❭ၰ݅ႊ⨆

ᇩȽ⊺❭᮹᳑❭aa܆⦽ᔍ⩶(snake-type) ᳑❭ʑᯕ݅. ᳑❭ʑ

bǍ࠺ᇡᨱᩑđࡽ᳑❭❱⦹ӹ᮹⡎ᮡ0.5 m, ׳ᯕ۵1.1mಽᕽ

᳑❭ʑ᮹ ᱥℕ ⡎ᮡ 30mᯕŁ, ᱥʑᕽᅕ ⦝ᜅ★᜾ᯕ݅. ᝅ⨹ᨱ

ᔍᬊࡽ ⠪໕ᙹ᳑۵ ʙᯕ 42m, ⡎ 36m, ׳ᯕ 1.05mᯕ݅. Fig.

1(b)۵ᅙᝅ⨹ᨱᔍᬊࡽ⠪໕ᙹ᳑᪡༉⩶ᖅ⊹}ֱࠥෝࠥ᜽⦽

äᯕ݅.

(3)

(a) wave flume for 2D test

(b) wave basin for 3D test Fig. 1. Experimental facilities and setup

(a) side view (b) top view

(c) front view of partially perforated wall with vertical-type slit

(d) front view of partially perforated wall with horizontal-type slit Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of model structure

Table 1. Dimensions of model structures (unit : cm)

hb hc S t CW CL Remarks

64.4 12.0 22.0 1.6 20.6 19.2 2D test

40.3 7.5 13.7 1.0 12.9 12.0 3D test

əญŁᅙᝅ⨹ᨱᔍᬊࡽᇥᕾᰆእ۵⍕⥉░, ᷾⡎ʑၰA/D converter ॒ᮝಽǍᖒࡹᨕᯩᮝ໑, ᝅ⨹❭ᱽᬱᨱ঑௝ᔾᖒࡽ

᳑❭ᝁ⪙ෝ᳑❭ʑಽᘂᝁ⦹Ł, ❭Łĥಽᇡ░ࠦ≉ࡽᯱഭෝᵝ❭

ᙹᜅ⟺✙ౝၰ❭Ł॒ᮝಽᇥᕾ⦹۵ʑ܆ᮥ⦹۵ᰆ⊹ᯕ݅. ᝅ⨹❭

ᖅᱶၰ❭Łĥ⊂ᨱᔍᬊࡽ❭Łĥ۵ᬊప᜾❭Łĥಽᕽʙᯕ۵

0.6mᯕŁ, ⊂ᱶჵ᭥۵ 0~±0.3mᯕ໑, ࠦ≉ᮉᮡ 20Hzᯕ݅.

2.2 ਓ෠ࡦ෴

ᮁᙹᝅᯕ 1}ᯙ ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᮥ ݡᔢᮝಽ ᱥ໕ᄞ᮹ slit ⩶ᔢ,

ᮁŖᮉ(P) ၰᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᨱ঑ෙၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥᝅ⨹ᱢᮝಽá☁⦹

ᩡ݅. ᝅ⨹ᨱᔍᬊࡽ༉⩶Ǎ᳑ྜྷ᮹⩶ᔢᮥࠥ᜽⦽äᯕFig. 2ᯕ݅.

Fig. 2(a, b)۵ bb ⊂໕ࠥ᪡ ⠪໕ࠥಽᕽ ༉⩶᮹ ᵝ᫵ ᱽᬱᮡ

Table 1ᨱᱽ᜽ࡹᨕ ᯩ݅. ᅙᝅ⨹ᨱᕽ۵ᔍᬊࡹ۵ᝅ⨹᜽ᖅ᮹

ᱽᬱᮥqᦩ⦹ᩍ2₉ᬱŝ3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱᔍᬊࡽ༉⩶ᮥᕽಽ݅ෙ

⇶⃺ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩍᱽ᯲⦹ᩡ݅. ᷪ, ᝅ⨹đŝ᮹ᝁ഑ᖒ⨆ᔢᮥ᭥⧕

2₉ᬱ ༉⩶ᮡ 3₉ᬱ ༉⩶ᨱ እ⧕ ᅕ݅ Ⓧí ᱽ᯲⦹ᩡ݅(Table 1 ₙ᳑). Fig. 2ᨱᕽhb۵Ǎ᳑ྜྷ⦹݉ᮝಽᇡ░slit ⦹݉ʭḡ᮹

׳ᯕ, hc۵slit ᔢ݉ᮝಽᇡ░Ǎ᳑ྜྷษ൉ʭḡ᮹׳ᯕ, S۵ᮁŖᇡ (slit)᮹ ʙᯕ, t۵ ᄞ᮹ ࢱ̹, CW۵ ᮁᙹᝅ ⡎, CLᮡ ᮁᙹᝅ᮹

ʙᯕᯕ݅. əญŁᮁŖᇡ᮹ʙᯕS۵SU᪡SLಽǍᇥ⦹ᩡ݅. SU۵

(4)

Table 2. Dimensions of partially perforated wall (unit : cm)

Case ID

vertical-type slit

porosity, P (%)

2D test 3D test

b1 b2 b3 b4 b1 b2 b3 b4

VP20 2.2 3.6 1.0 4.4 - - - - 20.8

VP30 2.0 3.2 1.4 4.0 1.25 2.0 0.88 2.5 29.2

VP40 2.0 2.4 2.0 4.0 - - - - 41.7

Case ID

Horizontal-type slit

porosity, P (%)

2D test 3D test

c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5

HP20 2.4 4.0 1.2 4.8 14.4 - - - 20.5

HP30 3.2 3.0 2.0 6.4 12.8 2.0 1.88 1.25 4.0 8.0 30.3

HP40 3.4 2.0 2.8 6.8 12.4 - - - 41.1

ᱶᙹ໕ᮝಽᇡ░slit ᔢ݉ʭḡ, SLᮡᱶᙹ໕ᮝಽᇡ░slit ⦹݉ʭḡ ᮹ ʙᯕᯕ݅. Fig. 2(c, d)۵ ᱥ໕ᄞ᮹ ⩶ᔢᮝಽᕽ bb ᳦

slit(vertical-type slit)ŝ⬂slit(horizontal-type slit) ༉⩶ᮥࠥ᜽

⦽äᯕ݅. ᅙᝅ⨹ᨱᱢᬊࡽᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢၰᮁŖᮉᨱ঑ෙᮁŖᇡ

ᱽᬱᮡTable 2ᨱᱶญ⦹ᩡ݅. ᮁŖᮉᮡFig. 2(c, d)ᨱࠥ᜽ࡽ

ၵ᪡ zᯕᮁŖᇡ ⦹݉ŝ ᔢ݉ᔍᯕ᮹ ᱥℕ ໕ᱢŝᮁŖᇡอ᮹

໕ᱢ᮹እಽᔑᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ᳦slit᮹Ğᬑᨱ۵ᱶᙹ໕ᨱᱲ⦹۵ᇡᇥ ᨱ ݡ⧕ ᮁŖᮉᮥ ᔑᱶ⦹ᩍࠥ ࡹḡอ, ⬂ slit᮹ Ğᬑᨱ۵ ᯕෝ

ᱢᬊ⧁ᙹᨧʑভྙᯕ݅. ᱥᚁ⦽ၵ᪡zᯕᝅ⨹᜽ᖅ॒᮹ᱽ᧞ᮝಽ

ᯙ⧕2₉ᬱᝅ⨹ŝ3₉ᬱᝅ⨹᜽࠺ᯝ⦽༉⩶ᮥᔍᬊ⧁ᙹᨧᨕ

ᬱ⩶ᮥ ᕽಽ ݅ෙ ⇶⃺ᮥ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ ᝅ⨹༉⩶ᮥ ᱽ᯲⦹ᩡ݅.

2.3 ਓ෠୺Ս

Ḣb᯦ᔍ᳑ÕᨱᕽᮁŖᇡ᮹⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹ʑ

᭥⧕ ᱥ໕ᄞᯕ ᳦ slitŝ ⬂ slitᯙ ᮁŖ 1ᝅ ⍡ᯕᜉᮥ ݡᔢᮝಽ

⦹ᩡᮝ໑, bb᮹ slit ⩶ᔢᄥಽ 3aḡ᮹ ᮁŖᮉᮥ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅.

᳦ slit᮹ Ğᬑᨱ P=20.8%(case VP20), 29.2%(case VP30), 41.7%(case VP40), ⬂ slitᯙ Ğᬑᨱ P=20.5%(case HP20),

30.3%(case HP30), 41.1% (case HP40)ᯕ݅. ᅙᝅ⨹ᨱᱢᬊࡽ

ᮁŖᇡ᮹ᱽᬱᮡTable 2ᨱᱽ᜽ࡹᨕᯩᮝ໑, slit ⩶ᔢᄥಽa܆⦽

⦽ᮁᔍ⦽ᮁŖᮉᯕࡹࠥಾ༉⩶ᮥᱽ᯲⦹ᩡᮝӹ, ᧞e᮹ᮁŖᮉ

₉ᯕ۵ ᳕ᰍ⦽݅.

Ğᔍ ᯦ᔍ❭᳑Õᨱᕽ ❭௲ŝ ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ ᔢ⪙᯲ᬊᨱ ᮹⦽

❭Łᱡq⬉ŝෝá☁⦹ʑ᭥⧕3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹ᩡᮝ໑, 3₉ᬱ

ᝅ⨹ᮡ ༉⩶ᱽ᯲Ğእ ॒᮹ ᱽ᧞ᮝಽ ᯙ⧕ bb᮹ slit ⩶ᔢᄥಽ

1}᮹ ᮁŖᮉอᮥ ݡᔢᮝಽ ⦹ᩡ݅. ᅙ ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ ྕŖǍ᳑ྜྷ

(case PW), ᳦slit(case VP30)ŝ⬂slit(case HP30) ᝅ⨹ᦩᮥ

ݡᔢᮝಽ⦹ᩡ݅. 3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱᱢᬊࡽ༉⩶᮹ᩑᰆᮡ༉⩶ᔢ20m ᯕ໑, ༉⩶᮹႑⊹۵Fig. 1(b)ෝₙ᳑⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ᝅ⨹᜽᯦ᔍ❭᪡

Ǎ᳑ྜྷᯕᯕ൉۵b(ⱖ)ᮡ༉⩶᮹ᖅ⊹bࠥෝᄡĞ⦹ᩍ᳑ᱩ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕ۵ 3₉ᬱ ᝅ⨹ᨱ ᔍᬊࡽ ᳑❭ʑa ݅ႊ⨆᳑❭ʑᯕʑ ভྙᨱ

Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ෝᰍ⩥⧁ᙹᯩᮝӹ, Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ಽᰍ⩥⧁Ğᬑᨱ

bb᮹᯦ᔍbᄥಽ࠺ᯝ⦽᳑Õ᮹❭௲ᮥᖅᱶ⦹ʑᨕಖŁ, ੱ⦽

᯦ᔍbᯕ⍅ḡíࡹ໕⫭ᱩᯕၽᔾ⦹íࡹᨕᝅ⨹đŝ᮹ᱶ⪶ࠥᨱ

ᩢ⨆ᮥၙ⋁ᙹᯩʑভྙᯕ݅. Fig. 3~Fig. 5۵ᝅ⨹ᦩᄥ༉⩶ᖅ⊹

ᰆ໕ᯕ݅.

(5)

Table 3. Wave conditions in experiment Significant wave

period, TS (s)

Significant wave height, (HS)O (cm)

Water depth,

hO (cm) Remarks 0.8 ~ 2.6 (쨣TS = 0.2) 2, 4 74.4 2D test 0.79, 1.11, 1.42, 1.74 2.5 46.5 3D test

(a) cases VP20 & HP20

(b) cases VP30 & HP30

(c) cases VP40 & HP40

Fig. 6. Reflection coefficients by porosity and slit shapes of front ᝅ⨹❭۵bᝅ⨹ᄥ(2₉ᬱၰ3₉ᬱᝅ⨹)ಽǍᇥ⦹ᩍᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ

݅(Table 3 ₙ᳑). 2₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᮡᱥ໕ᄞ᮹ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ, ᮁŖᮉ

ၰᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎॒ᨱ঑ෙᗭ❭✚ᖒᮥ⠪a⦹۵äᯕᵝࡽ༊ᱢᯕ ʑভྙᨱ᯦ᔍ❭᮹ᵝʑෝ݅᧲⦹íᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᱢᬊࡽ᯦ᔍ❭᮹

ᮁ᮹ᵝʑ(TS)۵ TS=0.8s~2.6sᯕ໑, ᵝʑ eĊ(ⱀTS)ᮡ ⱀTS=0.2 sᯕ݅. əญŁǍ᳑ྜྷᯕᖅ⊹ࡹʑᱥǍ᳑ྜྷᖅ⊹᭥⊹ᨱᕽ᮹ᮁ᮹❭

Ł((HS)O)۵(HS)O=2cm᪡4cmᯕ໑, Ǎ᳑ྜྷᖅ⊹᭥⊹ᨱᕽ᮹ᙹᝍ (hO)ᮡhO=74.4cmᯕ݅. hO=74.4cmᯙĞᬑ, ᱶᙹ໕ᮝಽᇡ░slit ᔢ݉ʭḡ᮹׳ᯕ(SU)᪡slit ⦹݉ʭḡ᮹׳ᯕ(SL)۵bbSU=12cm, SL=10cmᯕ݅. ᷪ, (HS)O=2cmᯙĞᬑᨱSU/(HS)O=6ŝSL/(HS)O

=5ᯕ໑, (HS)O=4cmᯙĞᬑᨱ۵SU/(HS)O=3ŝSL/(HS)O=2.5

݅. 3₉ᬱᝅ⨹᮹Ğᬑᨱ᯦ᔍ❭᮹ᮁ᮹ᵝʑ۵TS=0.79s, 1.11s, 1.42s ၰ1.74sᯕ໑, ᮁ᮹❭Ł۵(HS)O=2.5cmᯕ໑, ᱢᬊᙹᝍᮡ

hO=46.5cmᯕ݅. hO=46.5cmᯙĞᬑᨱSU=7.5cm, SLⴉ6.2cmᯕ အಽ(HS)O=2.5cm ᳑ÕᨱᕽSU/(HS)O=3.0ŝSL/(HS)O=2.5ᯕ݅.

əญŁ᯦ᔍ❭᪡Ǎ᳑ྜྷᯕᯕ൉۵b(ⱖ)ᮡⱖ=10°, 20° ၰ30°ෝ

ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᱽ᜽ࡽᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉၰ❭௲᮹ᱽᬱ॒(Table 1, Table 2 ၰ Table 3)ᮡ ༉⩶ᔢ᮹ sᮝಽᕽ 2₉ᬱ ᝅ⨹᮹ Ğᬑ

1/25, 3₉ᬱᝅ⨹᮹Ğᬑ1/40 ⇶⃺ᮥᱢᬊ⦹ᩍᬱ⩶ᮥ⇶ᗭ⦹ᩡᮝ ໑, ⇶⃺ᮥ ᱢᬊ⦹໕ ᬱ⩶sᮝಽ ⪹ᔑ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

༉ुᝅ⨹ᨱᱢᬊࡽᯝႊ⨆ᇩȽ⊺❭۵Bretschneider-Mitsuyasu ᵝ❭ᙹ ᜅ⟺✙ౝᮥ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ ᰍ⩥⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯦ᔍ❭۵ Ǎ᳑ྜྷᯕ

ᖅ⊹ࡹʑᱥ᮹᳑Õ, ᷪ☖ŝ❭šᱱᨱᕽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. 2₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱ ᕽ۵༉⩶Ǎ᳑ྜྷᯕᖅ⊹ࡹḡᦫ۵⩲ᙹಽᨱᕽǍ᳑ྜྷᖅ⊹᭥⊹, 3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱᕽ۵Fig. 1(b)ᨱࠥ᜽ࡽʑᵡᱱ(reference point)ᨱᕽ

᯦ᔍ❭ෝᔢ᜽ĥ⊂⦹ᩍŝࠥ⦽ၹᔍ❭᮹ၽᔾᮁྕෝ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡ݅.

əญŁǍ᳑ྜྷ॒ᨱ᮹⧕ၽᔾࡹ۵ၹᔍ❭aĥ⊂ᩢᩎԕಽᱥ❭ࡹ

۵äᮥ↽ᗭ⪵⦹ʑ᭥⧕݅᧲⦽ᗭ❭᜽ᖅᮥ∊ᇥ⯩႑⊹⦹ᩡ݅.

3. ᝅ⨹đŝᇥᕾၰŁₑ

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙᗭ❭✚ᖒ

ᮥ á☁⦹ʑ ᭥⧕ 2₉ᬱ ၰ 3₉ᬱ ᝅ⨹ᮥ ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. ❭௲ᯕ

Ǎ᳑ྜྷᨱḢbᮝಽ᯦ᔍ⦹۵2₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱᕽ۵ၹᔍĥᙹࠥ⇽ᮥ

☖⦽ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢၰᮁŖᮉᨱ঑ෙᗭ❭✚ᖒᮥ᭥ᵝಽá☁⦹ᩡŁ,

3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱᕽ۵Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ᨱݡ⦽ᇡᇥᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᗭ❭✚ᖒ

ᮥ ᱽℕ ᱥ໕᮹ ❭Łᇥ⡍ෝ ĥ⊂⦹ᩍ á☁⦹ᩡ݅.

3.1 କվಧଲਈଭࢱॷ൉ন

ᱥ໕ᄞ᮹ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ, ᮁŖᮉၰᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᨱ঑ෙᇡᇥ

ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ ၹᔍ✚ᖒᮥ 2₉ᬱ ᝅ⨹ᮥ ☖⧕ á☁⦹ᩡ݅.

Fig. 6ᮡ SU=12cm᪡ SL=10cm ᳑Õᨱᕽ ᮁŖᮉ ၰ ᮁŖᇡ

⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙၹᔍĥᙹᝅ⨹đŝಽᕽᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎(CW/LS)ᨱݡ⧕

ࠥ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᩍʑᕽ, LS۵᯦ᔍ❭᮹ᮁ᮹ᵝʑᨱݡ᮲⦹۵❭ᰆᯕ݅.

ᅙ ᝅ⨹᳑Õ ԕᨱᕽ ↽ᗭ ၹᔍĥᙹ۵ ʑ᳕ ᩑǍđŝ᪡ ᮁᔍ⦽

(6)

(a)쩁=10°

(b)쩁=20°

(c) 쩁=30°

Fig. 7. Normalized wave height along a wall (x-dir.) by front wall

(a)쩁=10°

(b)쩁=20°

(c) 쩁=30°

Fig. 8. Normalized wave height along a wall (x-dir.) by front wall CW/LS=0.1~0.15 ჵ᭥ᨱᕽĥ⊂ࡹᨩᮝ໑, ᮁŖᮉᨱ঑ෙ↽ᗭၹᔍ

ĥᙹၽᔾ᭥⊹᮹ᄡ⪵۵Ñ᮹ӹ┡ӹḡᦫᦹ݅. ᱥℕᱢᮝಽCW/LS ⴍ0.1ᯙĞᬑᨱ⬂slit(HP series)᮹ၹᔍĥᙹa᳦slit(VP series) ᮹đŝᅕ݅᧞e᯲íĥ⊂ࢉᮥ᦭ᙹᯩ݅. əญŁᱥၹᱢᮝಽ

᯦ᔍ❭᮹❭ŁaⓑĞᬑa᯲ᮡĞᬑᨱእ⧕ၹᔍĥᙹa᯲ᮭᮥ

᦭ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕ۵᯦ᔍ❭᮹❭⩶ĞᔍaⓑĞᬑa᯲ᮡĞᬑᨱእ⧕

ᨱթḡqᙁa Ⓧʑ ভྙᨱ ၹᔍĥᙹa ԏí ӹ┡ӹ۵ äᯕ݅.

(HS)O=4cm ᳑Õᨱᕽ┡ᮁŖᮉᨱእ⧕VP40 ၰHP40᮹Ğᬑa

slit ⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙၹᔍĥᙹ᮹₉ᯕaⓍíӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, HP40᮹Ğᬑ aVP40᮹Ğᬑᨱእ⧕15~20% ᱶࠥၹᔍĥᙹaԏíĥ⊂ࡹᨩ݅.

CW/LSⴌ0.05ᯙĞᬑ۵ᮁŖᮉᨱ঑ෙၹᔍĥᙹ᮹₉ᯕ۵Ⓧḡᦫᦹ ᮝӹ, CW/LSⴍ0.05ᯙ᳑Õᨱᕽ۵ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽᙹ⧪⦽ᝅ⨹ᦩᵲ

Pⴉ30%᮹ᗭ❭⬉ŝaaᰆᬑᙹ⦹íӹ┡ԍ݅. ᅙᝅ⨹ᨱᱢᬊࡽ

slit᮹ᔢ · ⦹݉Ł۵ᱶᙹ໕ᮝಽᇡ░SU=12cm᪡SL=10cm ᳑Õᯕ Ł᯦ᔍ❭᮹ᮁ᮹❭Ła(HS)O=2cm᪡4cmᯕʑভྙᨱᮁŖᇡᔢ·⦹

݉ᨱ᭥⊹⦹۵ྕŖᇡᨱ❭௲ᯕḢᱲᱢᮝಽᇡঋ⊹ḡᦫ۵᳑Õᯕ݅.

঑௝ᕽ ᮁᙹᝅ ԕᨱᕽ᮹ Ŗʑ⡍⫮ᮡ ၽᔾ⦹ḡ ᦫ۵݅.

3.2 լॷ଺ॷ൞୺Ս઩ছକվಧଲਈଭࢱॷ൉ন

Fig. 7~Fig. 10ᮡ ⱖ=10°, 20°, 30°ᯙ Ğᔍ ᯦ᔍ❭᳑Õᨱᕽ

Ǎ᳑ྜྷᱥ໕ᮥ঑ෙᔢݡ❭ŁෝḢพྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉ, ᳦slit ၰ⬂

slit ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᮥݡᔢᮝಽእƱࠥ᜽⦽äᯕ݅. Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭ෝ

ݡᔢᮝಽ⦽ᝅ⨹ᨱᕽ۵ᮁŖᮉᯕ᧞30%ᯙVP30ŝHP30 ᝅ⨹ᦩ

ᮥݡᔢᮝಽ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, bb᮹༉⩶ᩑᰆᮡ20mᯕ݅. Ǎ᳑ྜྷᱥ໕ᮥ

঑ෙ❭Łĥ⊂ᮡǍ᳑ྜྷᱥ໕ᄞᮝಽᇡ░0.05m ᯕĊ⦹ᩍ0.4m eĊᮝಽ❭Łĥෝ႑⊹⦽⬥ᝅ᜽⦹ᩡᮝ໑, Ǎ᳑ྜྷҾ݉⬉ŝ(end effect)ෝqᦩ⦹ᩍĥ⊂Ǎeᮡ༉⩶ᔢx=0m~18.8mಽᖅᱶ⦹ᩡ

݅(Fig. 1b ₙ᳑). ᅙᝅ⨹ᮡᱥ໕ᄞ᮹ᮁŖ⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙ₉ᯕᱱᮥ

á☁⦹۵äᯕᵝࡽ༊ᱢᯕʑভྙᨱxႊ⨆ᮝಽ᮹ĥ⊂ᮥ᭥ᵝಽ

ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. Table 3ᨱᱽ᜽ࡽၵ᪡zᯕᮁ᮹ᵝʑ4aḡ᳑Õᮥ

ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ࠺ᯝ᳑Õᮥݡᔢᮝಽ3⫭ᯕᔢၹᅖᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹

ᩍĥ⊂ࡽđŝෝᔑᚁ⠪Ɂ⦹ᩍđŝෝࠥ᜽⦹ᩡ݅. ᯦ᔍb, ᮁŖᇡ

⩶ᔢ, ᮁ᮹ᵝʑၰᮁ᮹❭Ł॒ᮥ݅᧲⦹íᱢᬊ⦹ᩍᝅ⨹ᮥᙹ⧪⦹

ᩡʑভྙᨱฯᮡĥ⊂ᯱഭa᳕ᰍ⦹ḡอ, ᅙםྙᨱᕽ۵ݡ⢽ᱢᯙ

đŝෝ ᱽ᜽⦹Ł á☁⦹Łᯱ ⦽݅.

Fig. 7~Fig. 10ᮡSU/(HS)O=3ၰSL/(HS)O=2.5 ᳑ÕᨱᕽTS=0.79s (CW/LS=0.133), 1.11s(CW/LS=0.073), 1.42s(CW/LS=0.050) ၰ

1.74s(CW/LS=0.039)ෝᱢᬊ⦽Ǎ᳑⩶ᔢ(ྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉ, ᳦slit ᮁŖ

⍡ᯕᜉၰ⬂slit ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ)ŝ᯦ᔍbᨱ঑ෙǍ᳑ྜྷᱥ໕ᨱᕽ᮹

ᔢݡ❭Łෝ እƱ ࠥ᜽⦽ äᯕ݅.

Fig. 7ᮡCW/LS=0.133ᯙ᳑Õ᮹đŝಽᕽḢพྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹

Ğᬑ(case PW)ᨱ᯦ᔍbᯕ᷾a⧉ᨱ঑௝ᦩᱶ❭Łᨱࠥݍ⦹۵

(7)

(a)쩁=10°

(b)쩁=20°

(c) 쩁=30°

Fig. 9. Normalized wave height along a wall (x-dir.) by front wall shapes for CW/LS=0.050

(a)쩁=10°

(b)쩁=20°

(c) 쩁=30°

Fig. 10. Normalized wave height along a wall (x-dir.) by front wall shapes for CW/LS=0.039

ᔢݡÑญ(x/LS)aṈᦥḱᮥ᦭ᙹᯩŁᔢݡ❭Ł۵HS/(HS)Oⴉ2ᨱ

ᙹಕ⦹۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ᯕ۵ḢพྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉᮥݡᔢᮝಽ

⦽ʑ᳕ᩑǍđŝ᪡࠺ᯝ⦽äᯕ݅. ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹Ğᬑᨱᔢݡ❭Ł ۵ⱖ=10° ᳑ÕᨱᕽHS/(HS)Oⴉ0.5, ⱖ=20° ᳑ÕᨱᕽHS/(HS)O 0.7, ⱖ=30° ᳑ÕᨱᕽHS/(HS)Oⴉ0.9ಽӹ┡ӹྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉᨱእ⧕

ᱽℕᱥ໕ᨱᕽԏᮡ❭Łaᇥ⡍⧉ᮥ᦭ᙹᯩᮝ໑, ᯦ᔍbᯕ᷾a⧁

ᙹಾᔢݡ❭Ł۵᷾a⦹ᩡ݅. ⬂ slitŝ᳦slitᨱݡ⦽₉ᯕෝá☁⧕

ᅕʑ᭥⧕x/LS>10ᯙǍeᮥݡᔢᮝಽĥ⊂ࡽᔢݡ❭Łෝᔑᚁ⠪

Ɂ⦹ᩍእƱ⧕ᅕ໕, ⱖ=10°ᯙĞᬑᨱHP30ᯕVP30᮹᧞88%, ⱖ=20°ᯙĞᬑᨱ᧞92 %, ⱖ=30°ᯙĞᬑᨱ᧞96%᮹ᔢݡ❭Ła

ᔑᱶࢉᮝಽᕽ⬂slitᨱ᮹⦽ᔢݡ❭Ła᧞e᯲íӹ┡ԍ݅. ᯕ۵

2₉ᬱ ᝅ⨹ᨱᕽ ⬂ slitᯕ ᳦ slitᨱ እ⧕ ၹᔍĥᙹa ᧞e ᯲í

ӹ┡ӽäᨱᔢ᮲⦹۵đŝᯕ݅. Fig. 8ᮡCW/LS=0.073ᯙ᳑Õ᮹

đŝಽᕽྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹Ğᬑᨱ۵Fig. 7ŝᮁᔍ⦽❭Łᇥ⡍ෝᅕᯙ

݅. ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹Ğᬑᨱ۵ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᯕqᗭ⧉ᨱ঑௝ᮁŖᇡ

⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙ₉ᯕaÑ᮹ӹ┡ӹḡᦫᦹŁ, ᯦ᔍbᯕᔢݡᱢᮝಽ

ⓑ᳑ÕᨱᕽFig. 7᮹đŝ᪡۵ݍญ⬂slit᮹❭Ła᳦slitᨱ

እ⧕ ᧞e Ⓧí ӹ┡ԍᮝӹ ə ₉ᯕ۵ Ⓧḡ ᦫᦹ݅. Fig. 9۵

CW/LS=0.050᮹ đŝಽᕽ ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ Ğᬑᨱ ᮁŖᇡ ⩶ᔢᨱ

঑ෙ₉ᯕ۵Fig. 8ŝzᯕÑ᮹ӹ┡ӹḡᦫᦹ݅. x/LS>6ᯙǍeᨱ

ݡ⧕ ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᮥ ݡᔢᮝಽ ĥ⊂ࡽ ᔢݡ❭Łෝ ᔑᚁ⠪Ɂ⦹໕, ⱖ=10°ᯙĞᬑᨱHS/(HS)Oⴉ0.7, ⱖ=20° ᳑ÕᨱᕽHS/(HS)Oⴉ0.9, ⱖ=30° ᳑ÕᨱᕽHS/(HS)Oⴉ1.1ಽӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ᯕ۵CW/LS=0.133

᳑Õᨱእ⧕ᔢݡ❭Ła᧞0.2 ᱶࠥⓍíӹ┡ӹ۵äᯕ݅. ᷪ, 2₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᨱᕽӹ┡ӽၵ᪡zᯕᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᯕqᗭ⧉ᨱ঑௝

ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ ᗭ❭⬉ŝa ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ qᗭ⦹ʑ ভྙᯕ݅. Fig.

10ᮡCW/LS=0.039᮹đŝಽᕽx/LS>4ᯙǍeᨱݡ⧕ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ

ᮥݡᔢᮝಽĥ⊂ࡽᔢݡ❭Łෝᔑᚁ⠪Ɂ⦹໕, ⱖ=10°ᯙĞᬑᨱ

HS/(HS)Oⴉ1, ⱖ=20° ᳑ÕᨱᕽHS/(HS)Oⴉ1.25, ⱖ=30° ᳑Õᨱᕽ

HS/(HS)Oⴉ1.3ಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ᱥℕᱢᮝಽCW/LS=0.050ᯙ᳑Õᨱ

እ⧕ᔢݡ❭Ła᷾a⦹ᩡᮭᮥ᦭ᙹᯩ݅. ੱ⦽ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᯕ

qᗭ⧉ᨱ঑௝᯦ᔍb᮹᷾aᨱ঑ෙᔢݡ❭Ł᮹᷾aĞ⨆ᮡqᗭ

⦹۵ äᮝಽ ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

Fig. 11ᮡHP30 ᝅ⨹ᦩᨱݡ⧕࠺ᯝᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎᮹᳑Õᨱᕽ

᯦ᔍbᨱ঑ෙᔢݡ❭Ł᮹ᄡ⪵ෝእƱࠥ᜽⦽äᮝಽᕽ᯦ᔍbᯕ

᷾a⧁ᙹಾ, ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᯕ᯲ᦥḩᙹಾᱽℕᱥ໕᮹ᔢݡ❭Ł۵

᷾a⧉ᮥ᦭ᙹᯩ݅. ᩑ❭aၽᔾ⦹۵᯦ᔍbჵ᭥ԕᨱᕽྕŖ⍡ᯕ ᜉ᮹Ğᬑᨱ۵❭௲᷾⡎ᯕⓍíၽᔾ⦹ḡอ, ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹Ğᬑᨱ ۵እƱᱢԏᮡ❭Łaᇥ⡍⦹໑əⓍʑ۵ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᨱ঑௝

݅෕݅. ᅙ ᝅ⨹᳑Õ ჵ᭥ԕᨱᕽ CW/LS>0.05ᯙ Ğᬑᨱ۵ ᱽℕ

(8)

(a) case HP30 & CW/LS=0.133

(b) case HP30 & CW/LS=0.073

(c) case HP30 & CW/LS=0.050

(d) case HP30 & CW/LS=0.039

Fig. 11. Normalized wave height along a wall (x-dir.) by incident angles

ᱥ໕ᨱᕽ❭௲᷾⡎ᮡၽᔾ⦹ḡᦫᦹᮝ໑, ᯕ్⦽⩥ᔢᮡǍ᳑ྜྷ

ᱥ໕ɝŁᇡ᮹ᦩᱶᖒ⪶ᅕ, ᖁၶᱲᦩ᜽᮹࠺᫵ᱡq॒᮹⊂໕ᨱᕽ

ᮁญ⦹í ᯲ᬊ⦹í ࢁ äᯕ݅.

4. đು

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ, ᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎, ❭⩶Ğᔍ॒ᨱ঑ෙ

ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᗭ❭✚ᖒᮥ2₉ᬱၰ3₉ᬱᝅ⨹ᮥ☖⧕Łₑ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᅙ ᝅ⨹ᮝಽᇡ░ ࠥ⇽ࡽ đುᮥ ᫵᧞⦹໕ ݅ᮭŝ z݅.

(1) ❭௲ᯕḢbᮝಽ᯦ᔍ⦹۵Ğᬑ, ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢᨱ঑ෙၹᔍĥᙹ ۵ᮁᔍ⦽ᮁŖᮉᨱᕽ⬂slitᯙĞᬑa᳦slitᯙĞᬑᨱእ⧕

᧞e᯲íĥ⊂ࡹᨩᮝӹə₉ᯕ۵Ⓧḡᦫᦹᮝ໑, ᱢᱶᔢݡᮁ

ᙹᝅ ⡎ᮡ 0.1~0.15ᯙ äᮝಽ ᇥᕾࡹᨩ݅.

(2) ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ၹᔍ✚ᖒᮡ᯦ᔍ❭Łᨱ঑௝₉ᯕaၽᔾ⦽݅.

ᷪ, ❭⩶ĞᔍaⓑĞᬑa᯲ᮡĞᬑᨱእ⧕᧞eԏᮡၹᔍĥᙹ

ෝ ᅕᩡᮝ໑, Ǎ᳑ྜྷ ᖅĥ᜽ ᯕෝ Łಅ⧁ ⦥᫵a ᯩ݅.

(3) Ğᔍ᯦ᔍ❭᳑ÕᨱᕽᮁŖᮉᯕᮁᔍ⧁Ğᬑ, ᮁŖᇡ⩶ᔢ(᳦

slitŝ⬂slit)ᨱ঑ෙᱽℕᱥ໕᮹❭Ł₉ᯕ۵Ñ᮹ၽᔾ⦹ḡ

ᦫᦹ݅. ᱥℕᱢᮝಽྕŖ⍡ᯕᜉᨱእ⧕ᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹ᔢݡ❭

Łaԏíӹ┡ԉᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯕ۵Ǎ᳑ྜྷᱡ໕ᇡ᮹ᦩᱶ ᖒ⪶ᅕၰᬕᩢ⊂໕॒ᨱᕽᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉᯕᮁญ⧉ᮥ᮹ၙ⦽݅.

(4) Ḣb᯦ᔍ᪡zᯕĞᔍ᯦ᔍ᮹Ğᬑᨱࠥᔢݡᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᯕqᗭ

⦹íࡹ໕ᱽℕᱥ໕᮹❭Ł۵᷾⡎ࡹᨩᮝ໑, ᝅᱽᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ

ᖅĥ᜽ᯝၹᱢᮝಽᱢᬊࡹŁᯩ۵ᮁᙹᝅ⡎ᮥqᦩ⧁ভᖅĥ

❭᳑Õᅕ݅۵⠪ᔢ❭᳑ÕᨱᕽᮁŖ⍡ᯕᜉ᮹⬉ᬊᖒᯕⓍ݅Ł

⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

qᔍ᮹ɡ

ᅙ םྙᮡ ⦽ǎ⧕᧲ŝ⦺ʑᚁḥ⯆ᬱ᮹ ᩑǍእ ḡᬱ(ŝᱽჩ⪙:

20110131)ᮥၼᦥᙹ⧪ࡽᩑǍᯕ໑, ᩑǍእḡᬱᨱqᔍऽพܩ݅.

References

Fugazza, M. and Natale, L. (1992). “Hydraulic design of perforated breakwaters.” J. of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vo. 118, No. 1, pp. 1-14.

Jarlan, G. E. (1961). “A perforated vertical wall breakwater.” Dock and Harbour Authority XII, Vol. 486, pp. 394-398.

Kim, Y. T. and Lee, J. I. (2013). “Estimation of optimal slit length of perforated wall below still water level: Single chamber condition.” J. of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 327-334 (in Korean).

Li, Y. C., Dong, G., Liu, H. and Sun, D. (2003). “The reflection of oblique incident waves by breakwaters with double-layered perforated wall.” Coastal Engineering, Vol. 50, pp. 47-60.

Liu, H. J., Liu, Y. and Li, Y. C. (2009). “The theoretical study on diagonal wave interaction with perforated-wall breakwater with rock fill.” Acta Oceanologica Sinica, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 103-110.

Liu, Y., Li, Y. C. and Teng, B. (2007). “The reflection of oblique waves by an infinite number of partially perforated caissons.”

Ocean Engineering, Vol. 34, pp. 1965-1976.

Pyun, C. K. (1980). A study of wave forces acting on the perforated caisson type breakwater, Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University (in Korean).

Suh, K. D. and Park, W. S. (1995). “Wave reflection from perforated- wall caisson breakwaters.” Coastal Engineering, Vol. 26, pp.

177-193.

Williams, A. N., Mansour, A. E. M. and Lee, H. S. (2000). “Simplified

analytical solutions for wave interaction with absorbing-type

caisson breakwaters.” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 27, pp. 1231-1248.

수치

Table 1. Dimensions of model structures (unit : cm)
Table 2. Dimensions of partially perforated wall (unit : cm) Case ID vertical-type slit porosity,P (%)2D test3D test b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 VP20 2.2 3.6 1.0 4.4 - - - - 20.8 VP30 2.0 3.2 1.4 4.0 1.25 2.0 0.88 2.5 29.2 VP40 2.0 2.4 2.0 4.0 - - - -
Fig. 6. Reflection coefficients by porosity and slit shapes of front ᝅ⨹❭۵bᝅ⨹ᄥ(2₉ᬱၰ3₉ᬱᝅ⨹)ಽǍᇥ⦹ᩍᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅(Table 3 ₙ᳑)
Fig. 8. Normalized wave height along a wall (x-dir.) by front wall CW/LS=0.1~0.15 ჵ᭥ᨱᕽĥ⊂ࡹᨩᮝ໑, ᮁŖᮉᨱ঑ෙ↽ᗭၹᔍ
+3

참조

관련 문서