• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Investigation of Sectional Force on Increasing of Dead Load with Bridge Deck Overlay using Electric Arc Furnace Slag Sand

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Investigation of Sectional Force on Increasing of Dead Load with Bridge Deck Overlay using Electric Arc Furnace Slag Sand"

Copied!
9
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

ଫ ㎷㩑㸡㗨 ପ

㻐㏁㗂 㣨䍾ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ኢ ₚ῏⺂ ㋨㚧䉓㹜 ᰂ 㑹㴏䀬㕲 㿋㒳Ỷ ๖ኞ ᯒႾᜲ 㑽㚧㖅㇣䇝

㼔㳱㈋Á㺮㞹㿀Á㏧㲵㨁

(㾔)㣯㲻ṪₚἆṎ ㎷㩑㮩㌙㦯*

Investigation of Sectional Force on Increasing of Dead Load with Bridge Deck Overlay using Electric Arc Furnace Slag Sand

Won-Kyong Jung, Beom Jun Chon G and Yong-Soo Gil

Department of Research Center, SAMWOO IMC

Ὰ ả

Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞኢ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ₺؎⃒ᆂ ᧒῏⹾ݖ ‪⺚ᩂ஺ ⅂◆᪲Ỷᩂ ⅂Իآ℻Ỷᩂ ᚮṮ℻⺂ ῏⁛᧧⨂⁾ ⅂ԻᯒႾܞኢ Ỷₚ

⋻▾ዒ⹾ἒ Ṯ℻ൂ ڒ↖ᆂ ᗦ⽾ᰂ⡂ ₚ὎ₚা K₶⁾ ₚ೿ ớ⅂, ᯒႾܞ⁾ ⽺⹿℧ · ᑢዒ℧ Ω⺓ᩗ ⋃దᰂ⡂ ᧒῏⹾ἒẢ ⺂ఊ.

ῖዒাႢỶᩂ஺ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ኢ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ₺؎⃒ᆂ ⾂῏⹾ݖ ‪⺂ ⅂೪℧ ݖᔾ⁢ᆂᩂ KS F 4571ₚ ⅂℻ാỚ ᚦ᧖ ᑢ⁾ ₶ῶ⽺ ᰂᯊ⪂ ݖᔾₚ ዮᅎാỮఊ. ᘞ ἖ڒỶᩂ஺, Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ኢ PMC(Polymer Modified Concrete) ⴒ⃋؛ᖻỶ

₺؎⃒ᆂ ❾⽾⹾ἦ ףῖ, ⡾⦒ዒ⯞⁾ ؆℻⹾∷ ⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞ ٶჯ ᧧ᚦỶ ᔞ❾஺ ἧ⻋Ỷ ద⹾ἒ ἖ڒ⹾؆₶ ⹾ἦఊ. ᘞ ἖ڒỶᩂ

஺ ᩆ℻ൂ 4Ԧ⋦ ⼻ᰃ⁾ ٶჯ(RC ᯒႾᜲٶ, RC Ⴂ፾ٶ, PSC Beamٶ, Steel Box girderٶ) ⴒ⃋⁾ ఎ‪⋮ჯₚ ᧧⻋ ℧῏ᰂ, ⴒ⃋⹾

∷ ⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞ K◚ ؆℻⹾∷⁦ ả 1~2% ₚ৚ᆂ ⋃Ԧ⹾؆, ⹾∷↖⺏Ỷ ⁾⺂ ᚦ⃒ᅋ(ᩊתᏎ፾⯞)⁦ ả 2% ₚ৚ᆂ ⋃Ԧ⹾ἦఊ. ܞ ዒ؆ ⴒ⃋⹾∷ ⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞ ద᧧ ڒ↖ᑢ⁾ ఎ᎚֦⫆ኢ ᬾ⺯⺂ זآ, ఎ᎚ ṮK⁎ₚ ả 3% ₚ৚ᆂ Զ᪲⹾ἦఊ. ๖Ⴂᩂ, ⴒ⃋⁾ ఎ‪

⋮ჯ ⋃Ԧᆂ ₞⺚ ڒ↖ᑢ⁾ ڒ↖℧ ṮKᩗỶ஺ ἧ⻋ ᔞ❾⋦ Ṱ ֩⁢ᆂ ⰶఎൂఊ.

∢⅂Ớ  ῲݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ, PMC, ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋, ؆℻⹾∷

Abstract

Electric arc furnace slag is made in ironworks during steel refining, it is been increasing chemical and physical resistibility using ageing method of unstable state of melting steel slag for using concrete’s fine aggregates. Which is been changing stable molecular structure of aggregates, it restrains moving of ion and molecule. In Korea, KS F 4571 has been prepared for using the electric arc furnace slag to concrete aggregates. In this study, Electric arc furnace slag is used in the PMC(Polymer Modified Concrete) which is applied a bridge pavement of rehabilitation, largely. In that case, this study evaluates the structural safety about increasing the specific weight. The 4-type bridges(RC slab bridge, RC rigid-frame bridge, PSC Beam bridge, Steel box girder bridge) pavement’s increasing the total dead load is in 1 ~ 2%. Design moments in a load combination are increased less then 2%. safety factor is decreased less than 3%. Therefore, the structural safety has no problem for applying the electric arc furnace slag within PMC in bridge.

Key words : G Electric arc furance, PMC, Bridge deck pavement, Dead load

* Received : November 20, 2012 Á1st Revised : January 4, 2013Á2nd Revised : January 30, 2013ÁAccepted : February 8, 2013 Corresponding Author : Won-kyong Jung (E-mail: [email protected])

Department of research center, SAMWOO IMC CO.,LTD, 33-8 Ogeum-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-855, Korea Tel : +82-2-3400-8781 / Fax : +82-2-3400-8769

;The Korean Institute of Resources Recycling. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms

of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits

unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

(2)

1. ᩂ ᆆ

Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞႦ ◆⁾ ⅂↖ ؛℻ ∷ ⦒ֲ ⅂ᩆ,

⅂Ի, ṻ἖ ؛℻ ∷ ⅂Ի؛℻Ỷᩂ ỡỚ⋦஺ ⅂ԻᯒႾܞ ᆂ᲎ ⅂ᩆ؛℻Ỷᩂ ᕂᨃാ஺ ᚦ᧖ᑢ₞ ؆ᆂᯒႾܞὦ஺

ڒᚪാ᎖, ⅂ԻᯒႾܞ஺ ᆂ(㗂)Ỷ ๖Ⴂ Kᆂ ᯒႾܞὦ Kݖᆂ ᯒႾܞᆂ ᚪቾൂఊ. ₢ᔾ℧⁢ᆂ ⅂ԻᯒႾܞ஺ ᚮ Ṯ℻⺂ ῏⁛᧧⨂Ỷᩂ ỡỚ⋦ᓦᆂ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ؎⃒ᆂ ᧒

῏ാݖ ‪⺚ᩂ஺ ڒ↖℧ Ṯ℻ᩗ ⽻ᘚኢ ‪⹾ἒ Ṯ℻⽺

▾ዒ(Ỷₚ⋻)ኢ ᰂ⺯⺂ ⿪ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ؎⃒ᆂ ᧒῏ാֲ ൂ ఊ.1,2)ₚᄒ⺂ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ⁾ Ṯ℻⽺ ▾ዒ஺ ᰂԪ آ ᝪ῏ ❇᎚Ỷᩂ ᚮዒ⹾ἒ ⼪⃒ ړ৚⁾ Kݖᆂ ᯒႾܞ

⁾ ⃒⾂῏ ῏೪஺ ೪ᆂ῏ ᔵ ᩗ⫆῏ₚ ả 85% ℻೪ᆂ ᕂᨃჯ⁾ దᚦᚪ ╎⋦⹾᎖, ⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ؎⃒ ท ᰊ⅂

֚ᩊ⼪⃋Ỷᩂ Ὰڒാ؆ ₮஺ ؎⃒ᆂᩂ⁾ ⾂῏⁦ ᔞᔞ

⺂ ᰊ℻ₚఊ. ܞᄒা ῖዒাႢỶᩂ 2011੪ ᕂᨃ⺂ ؆ᆂ ᯒႾܞὦ ⅂ԻᯒႾܞ஺ ԧԧ 1,359ዲ ⫊آ 1,033ዲ ⫊

⁢ᆂ K◚℧⁢ᆂ ả 2,400ዲ ⫊ ℻೪ ᨃ᧖ാ؆ ₮⁢᎖,

⅂ԻᯒႾܞ ∷ Kݖᆂ ᯒႾܞ⁾ ᕂᨃჯ⁦ 364ዲ⫊, K ᆂᯒႾܞ஺ ả 668ዲ ⫊ ℻೪ₚ᎖ ᯒႾܞ⁾ ⃒⾂῏ኆ

 ᧚Ⳛᘚ᎚, ؆ᆂ ᯒႾܞὦ ⅂Ի ᯒႾܞ Ꮞ൶ 100%Ỷ ܢℷ⹾؆ ₮⁢া ⅂Ի ᯒႾܞ஺ Ṫ⋧ݲ⋦ ᚦԦԦ❾Ԧ

৔⁦ ᚪẢỶ ⺂℻℧⁢ᆂ ᧒῏ₚ ാ؆ ₮Ớ, ᚦԦԦ❾ኢ સ₢ ᬾ ₮஺ ᚪẢỶ ద⺂ ἖ڒԦ ጊῖ ⹪Ὰ⺂ ᰊ℻

ₚఊ.3,4)

ړ৚Ỷᩂ஺ ₚὦ Կ⁦ ᑞ⅂ኢ ⺚ז⹾ݖ ‪⹾ἒ Kݖ ᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ(Electric Arc Furnace Slag ₚ⹾ EFS) ኢ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ₺؎⃒ᆂ ⾂῏⹾ݖ ‪⺂ ⅂೪℧ ݖᔾ⁢

ᆂᩂ KS F 4571(⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ؎⃒, 2011. 5)ₚ ⅂℻ാỮ؆ ᚦ᧖ᑢ⁾ ₶ῶ⽺ ᰂᯊ⪂ ݖᔾₚ ዮᅎാỚ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ₺؎⃒ ❾⽾Ỷ ద⺂ ἖ڒԦ ⚂ܢ ⾂ ᕂギ ⋪⺯ാ؆ ₮⁢া,5) ⼪⃒ݲ⋦ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ

؎⃒஺ ᰊ῏⽺ ఎתỶ஺ ೪ఒ⹾⋦ Ꮱ⹾ἦ⁢᎖, ⡾⦒ዒ

⯞῏ ₺؎⃒ᆂᩂ ⾂῏ Ԧோᩗ ⳯Ԧ⹾ݖ ‪⺂ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒⁾ ❾⽾⁎Ỷ ๖ኞ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞⁾ ڙ⋦ Ṱ

⁦ ᩗ᧧, ἓ⹿℧ ᩗோ ᔵ ἢ⺚, ⧪᧖⽺, ೿ז⁛⺚ ท⁾

৚ڒᩗோ ⳯ԦỶ ద⹾ἒ ἖ڒ⹾؆ ₮஺ ఎתἦ⁢া2,6)

⚂ܢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ኢ 100% ❾⽾⹾ἒ ᩗோ

Ղᩆآ ℧῏ᩗ ⽻₞⺂ ᪳ףᩗ Ⴂ⩳ᯊՂ⋮ ؆ᩗோ ⡾

⦒ዒ⯞Ԧ ՂᕂാỚ ℧῏ാ؆ ₮ఊ.7)

ܞᄒা, Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞኢ ₚ῏⺂ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ⅂↖

ᰂ ⋦℧ാ஺ ᑞ⅂ℶ ∷ ⹾াԦ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₶◚

⁾ સ⁦ ᔦ೪ ᔵ ఎ‪⋮ჯ⁢ᆂ ₞⺂ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞⁾ ఎ‪⋮

ჯ ⊯, ؆℻⹾∷ ⋃ద⁾ ᑞ⅂ℶ Ԧ⋪ఊ஺ ֩ₚఊ. ₚ ᄒ⺂ ؆℻⹾∷ ⋃ద஺ ݖ↚ ڒ↖ᑢ⁾ ఎ᎚ᅋآ ڒ↖℧

ṮKᩗỶ ἧ⻋ ᔞ❾ֲ ാᓦᆂ ᧒KỶ ₚỶ ద⺂ ⳯Ԧ Ԧ ₚሎỚ⅞Ả ⺆ ֩ₚ᎖ ܞ ἧ⻋⁾ ℻೪ኢ ᎚ᔦギ ᚪ ᩃ⹾ἒẢ ⺂ఊ. ܞᄒা ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ⋃ԦỶ ἧ⻋

 ᕁ⋦ Ṱ஺ ೪ᆂ ᘚᬾ⃒⁾ ףῖ ܞ ᧒῏ᩗỶ ⅂⺂

ᕁ⋦ Ṱֲ ൂఊ. ܞᄒা ٶჯ⁾ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⃒ᆂ ℧῏⺆ ף ῖỶ஺ ݖ↚⁾ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ת ༶஺ Ṫᯊⰺ⯞תἚآ ఒዒ ؆

℻⹾∷ₚ ⋃Ԧ⹾ֲ ാᓦᆂ ₚỶ ద⺂ ⳯ԦԦ ᩆ⺯ാỚẢ

⺆ ֩ₚఊ. ๖Ⴂᩂ ᘞ ἖ڒỶᩂ஺ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ⴒ⃋ ఎ᎚ᘚ

ᬾὦ ٶ᎚⃒ⴒ⃋ ⃒ᇲᆂ Ղᕂൂ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎

⃒ ❾⽾ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞(Electric Arc Furnace Slag Concrete ₚ⹾ EFS-Con)Ỷ ద⹾ἒ ݖᘞ℧₞ ⃒ᇲᑢᩗ ⳯Ԧ ⿪ ٶჯ⼻ᰃỶ ๖Ⴂ ݖ↚ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⃒ᇲὦ EFS-Con ℧῏

ᰂ ؆℻⹾∷ ⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞ ٶჯ ᧧ᚦᯒႾᜲỶ ᔞ❾஺ ἧ

⻋Ỷ ద⹾ἒ ڒ↖⺚ᩃ ᰊᰂ⹾ἦఊ. ₚኢ ⫛⺚ ᧖ừᚦ ᧖ᑢ₞ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ኢ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞Ỷ ᧒῏

ᰂ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ⋃ద ⦒ݖὦ ܞỶ ๖ኞ ڒ↖ᑢ ֖೿ ᔵ ఎ᎚ᅋ⁾ ᗦ⽺ኢ ؆╖, ⻋⿪ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒

ኢ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞Ỷ ⾂῏⹾ݖ ‪⺂ ݖ☮₶ᇲᆂ ⅂ᰂ⹾؆₶

⹾ἦఊ.

2. ᧒῏⃒ᇲ ᔵ ᕖ⺏᧖℻

2.1. ᧒῏⃒ᇲ 2.1.1. ☮᪳ףᰂ፾⯞

ᘞ ἖ڒỶ ᧒῏ൂ ᰂ፾⯞஺ ☮᪳ףᩗתἚ⁾ ᰂ፾⯞ᆂ ړ৚Ỷᩂ SBႢ⩳ᯊ Ղ⋮ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ᨃ᧖K῏ ᰂ፾⯞ᆂ Ղᕂ, ᨃ᧖ൂ ֩⁢ᆂ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ ❾⽾ ⡾

⦒ዒ⯞Ỷ ᧒῏ ∷₞ ᰂ፾⯞ᆂᩂ ∢Ὰ ᰂ፾⯞⁾ ⽺⹿℧

ᩗᚪ⁦ Table 1آ Կఊ.

Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of rapid-set cement Time of setting Fineness

(cm

2

/g)

Specific gravity

Cement compounds(%)

Initial set Final set C

3

S C

2

S C

4

A

3

S C

4

AF C

3

A CaSO

4

Ca(OH)

2

30min. 40min. 5,602 2.9 16.0 16.0 30.0 6.0 3.0 20.0 5.0

(3)

2.1.2. Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ ᔵ ڛ⁦؎⃒

ᘞ ᰊ⻾Ỷ ᧒῏ൂ ₺؎⃒῏ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ஺ ⦒ ݖԦ 5 mm ᔞዲₚ؆, ڒ᧧⼻⁾ ₫⼻ ⯟ᩗ⁢ᆂ ⺂ఊ.

༶⺂ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞỶ ద⹾ἒ ܯ৯ᕏᰃ⁾ Ỷₚ⋻▾

ዒኢ ⹾ἒ Ṯ℻⽺ൂ ᚪ₶ڒ↖ᆂ ᗦ⽾ᰂ⧎ ؎⃒ኢ ᧒῏

⹾ἦఊ. Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒஺ ◂἖₺؎⃒ὦ ᝪ ٶ⹾ἒ, ጊῖ ৔⁦ ょᬾ⁎ ⋦௮؆ ₮Ớ ؎⃒⁾ ⶮ⋮

ئዒԦ ῏ₚ⹾᎖ ᰊ℧⁎ₚ 70%Ỷ ఒ⺚ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ⅂↖

ᰂ ᰂ፾⯞ ΩԶ, ֚↖ᬾ⚻ ΩԶ, ؆ᔦ೪⁾ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ⅂

↖Ԧ Ԧோ⹾ֲ ൂఊ.7)ᘞ ἖ڒỶ ᧒῏ൂ ₺؎⃒⁾ ᑢዒ

℧ ⯟ᩗ⁦ ئᅎ ݖ∦₞ KS F 4571(⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ؎⃒)آ KS F 2526(⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ؎⃒)Ỷ ⅂ ᰂാ؆ ₮஺ ݖ∦ ዲ↗ᰂ⧊஺ ֩ ᧒῏⹾ἦ⁢᎖ ܞ

৚῏⁦ Table 2ὦ Կఊ. ༶⺂ ᘞ ᰊ⻾Ỷ ᧒῏ൂ ڛ⁦؎

⃒஺ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⁾ ಍Ḳῖݖ ῏೪ᆂ ⚂ద❾ᬾ 19 mm ؎

⃒ኢ ᧒῏⹾ἦఊ.

༶⺂ ᘞ ἖ڒỶ ᧒῏ൂ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒Ỷ ద⺂ ◚Ԧኪ ᰂ⻾ ❇℻ זآ, Table 3 ᔵ Fig. 1آ Կ ₚ KS ܂׏Ỷ ℧⺏⺂ זآኢ ᘚἦ⁢᎖ ⶂ∦₫೪؇ᩆ

∷ 1.2 mm ~ 0.6 mm ᖺ‪⁾ ؎⃒Ԧ Ԧ⃋ ዴ⁦ ڒᩗ

⹾؆ ₮ఊ. ₚ஺ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞԦ ؛⃋⅂ⶮ⁢ᆂ ᨃ ᧖ാ Ớ ܆₢⺂ ₫೪ኢ Ԧ⋦஺ ⯟⋻ Ṳ ᬾ ₮⁢᎖, ₚ ኢ ⫛⺚ ܆⋮⺂ ⅂ⶮ ᨃ᧖Ỷ ๖ኞ ⼪⃋ ⶮ⋮ئዒỶ೪ ೪ῦ ∢؆ ₮ఊ.

2.1.3. ⴚዒ፞

ᘞ ᰊ⻾Ỷ ᧒῏ൂ Ⴂ⩳ᯊ஺ ړ৚ J᧒⁾ ⅂ⶮ⁢ᆂ ᩗ ᚪ⁦ ᯊⰖᄲÁᚦ⧦ฺỺ תἚᆂ Ⴂ⩳ᯊ ؆⼻ᚪ 47%ὦ ᑢ 53%⁾ ẇ᧧᧧⨂ₚఊ. ᰂ፾⯞ Ꮞኚ⧦ኚὦ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞

Ỷ ᧒῏⹾೪ᆃ ᨃ᧖ൂ ⅂ⶮ⁢ᆂ, ٶ᎚⃒ⴒ⃋آ ⡾⦒ዒ

⯞ⴒ⃋ ᘚᬾ῏ Ⴂ⩳ᯊՂ⋮ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞Ỷ ਸ਼ዒ ℧῏ാ؆

₮஺ ⅂ⶮₚఊ.

2.2. ᕖ⺏᧖℻

Table 4஺ ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ᆂ 100% ❾⽾⹾ἒ ᧖℻⺂ ݖ↚ ἖ڒ⁾ ⚂℧ᕖ⺏ᝪ7)ὦ ݖ

↚⁾ ٶ᎚⃒ⴒ⃋◚₞ ⴚዒ፞ Ղ⋮ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞(Polymer Modified Concrete, ₚ⹾ PMC) ᕖ⺏ⶂኢ ᝪٶ⺂ ֩ₚ ఊ. ₚኢ ᧚Ⳛᘚ᎚, EFS-Con⁦ PMC ᕖ⺏ దᝪ ఎ‪

ז⺏⃒ჯ 60 kg/m3ὦ ఎ‪Ⴂ⩳ᯊჯ 51 kg/m3 ℮Զ⺂

⯟⋻ Ԧ⋦؆ ₮ఊ. ₚᄒ⺂ ఎ‪ז⺏⃒ ᔵ Ⴂ⩳ᯊ Ω

Table 2. Physical properties of fine aggregates

Items Max size(mm) Specific gravity Water absorption(%) Unit weight(kg/m

3

) Solid volume(%) Electric arc furnace

oxidizing slag aggregate 5.00 3.70 0.41 2,554 70.0

KS F 4571* 5.00 3.10< < 2.00 1,800< -

Natural sand 5.00 2.60 1.11 1,559 60.0

KS F 2526** 5.00 2.50< < 3.00 - -

KS F 4571* : electric arc furnace oxidizing slag aggregate for concrete KS F 2526** : aggregate for concrete

Table 3. EFS sieving separation results Size

number(mm) Unit Passing each sieve(%) Result Standard

10 % 100 100

5 % 100 90 ~ 100

2.5 % 100 80 ~ 100

1.2 % 90 50 ~ 90

0.6 % 51 25 ~ 65

0.3 % 17 10 ~ 35

0.15 % 6 2 ~ 15

F.M 2.36

Fig. 1. Shape of fine aggregates.

(4)

Զ⁾ ῶ₞⁦ ڒ᧧⼻ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺؎⃒ᆂ ◂

἖₺؎⃒ኢ ❾⽾⺎⁢ᆂ᲎ ৔⁦ ᑢ-ᰂ፾⯞ᝪ ↖֚Ỷᩂ ೪ ጊῖ સ⁦ ₷ừᩗ া⧦৚᎖, ₺؎⃒⁾ સ⁦ ᰊ

℧⁎Ỷ ⁾⺚ ז⺏⃒ჯ ℮Զᰂ⧒ ᬾ ₮Ữఊ؆ ᘚ؆

ാỮఊ.7)ᰊ৚ ᕖ⺏ᭂᩂ஺ ።Ω Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ₺

؎⃒ὦ ڛ⁦؎⃒ኢ ᔟᩂỶ ⭒₫⹾ἒ 30☮Ԫ ᝪᝮ ⿪ ᰂ፾⯞ኢ ੉؆ ఊᰂ 30☮Ԫ ֚ᝪ᝺ ᰊᰂ⹾ἦఊ. ܞ ዒ؆ Ⴂ⩳ᯊὦ ᑢ ◎Ԧ⺂ ⿪ ⚂↫ 30☮Ԫ ᝪ᝺

ᰊᰂ⹾ἒ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ኢ ᕖ⛂⹾ἒ ᰂ⻾◚ኢ ⅂₷⹾ἦ⁢᎖

ݖ֚ặᨃ⹾ἦఊ.

3. ᰊ৚ᰂ⻾⳯Ԧ זآ

3.1. Ի೪⯟ᩗ

PMC஺ ᯊⰖᄲÁᚦ⧦ฺỺ תἚ ⴚዒ፞ኢ ᑢ ᪳Ỷ ؆ ኚֲ ᚪ᧒ᰂ⧎ SBႢ⩳ᯊὦ ↖ݖԻ೪ ᕂ⼪ₚ ῖᬾ⺂ ☮

᪳ףתἚ ᰂ፾⯞, ᏎႾ, ₶Ԯ ᔵ ᪲ჯ⁾ ⽢⽺⅂ὦ ᑢ

℧℻ᝪ⁎ ⽢⺏⹾ἒ ⅂↖⺂ ☮᪳ף Ⴂ⩳ᯊ Ղ⋮ ⡾⦒ዒ

⯞ₚఊ. PMC⁾ Ի೪Ỷ ద⺂ ᰊ৚ᰊ⻾ זآ, Table 5⁾

Ի೪⯟ᩗ ᘚἦఊ. ṻ⚻Ի೪⁾ ףῖ ݖ∦ 21 MPaᘚఊ 4ᰂԪ Ի೪Ỷᩂ 13 MPa ₚ᧧, 7₢ ṻ⚻Ի೪Ỷᩂ஺

2ᕖ ₚ᧧ ᧧⾲⹾஺ ֩⁢ᆂ া⧦৒ఊ. ぎԻ೪஺ 4ᰂԪ Ի೪ 6.0 MPa, 7₢ 8.1 MPa⁾ ぎԻ೪ኢ া⧦৚஺ ⯟ᩗ

 ᘚἦఊ. ༶⺂, ᚦ╏Ի೪೪ 4ᰂԪ Ի೪Ỷᩂ 1.5 MPa ᆂ ݖ∦ 1.4 MPa ዲ↗⹾஺ זآኢ ỡỮ⁢᎖ 7₢ Ի ೪Ỷᩂ஺ ݖ∦ దᝪ 2ᕖ ₚ᧧⁾ Ի೪ᕂ⼪ ⯟ᩗ ᘚἦ ఊ. ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺂ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞⁾

Ի೪ ❇℻זآ, 4ᰂԪ ṻ⚻Ի೪஺ ݖ∦ 21 MPaᘚఊ ả 16 MPa, PMC 34.1 MPaᘚఊ 2.8 MPa સ⁦ 36.9 MPa

⁾ ؆Ի೪ኢ া⧦৮ఊ. 7₢Ի೪஺ 55.8 MPa ℻೪ݲ⋦⁾

Ի೪ᕂ⼪ₚ ാ஺ ֩ ⽻₞⹾ἦఊ. ぎԻ೪஺ 4ᰂԪ ๲, Ի೪ݖ∦₞ 3.15 MPa⁾ 2ᕖ ₚ᧧⁾ Ի೪ᕂ⼪ ᘚἦ⁢

᎖ 7₢ ぎԻ೪Ỷᩂ஺ 10.7 MPaݲ⋦ Ի೪ᕂ⼪ₚ ാ஺

⯟ᩗ ᘚἦఊ. ༶⺂, ᚦ╏Ի೪஺ Ⴂ⩳ᯊ⁾ ◎Ԧჯₚ Ω ԶാỮ⁲Ỷ೪ ᚮڒ⹾؆ PMCὦ ⁆᧒⺂ Ի೪ᕂ⼪ ⯟ᩗ

 ᘚἦఊ. ₚᄒ⺂ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞኢ ₚ῏⺂ ⡾⦒ዒ

⯞⁾ સ⁦ Ի೪ᕂ⼪ ₚ⁆஺, ◂἖₺؎⃒ኢ ❾⽾⺂ Kݖ ᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ⁾ ڒ⼻ ₫⼻Ỷ ⁾⺂ ⁆೿ᩗ ⋃⋪(ᘢᗆỚ ዧ)Ỷ ⁾⺂ Ⴂ⩳ᯊ ◎Ԧჯ Զ᪲, ؎⃒ ₶◚⁾ સ⁦ ᰊ

℧ኆỶ ⁾⺂ ఎ‪ᬾჯ ᔵ ఎ‪ז⺏⃒ჯ Զ᪲Ỷ೪ ᚮڒ

⹾؆ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ৚ᚦ⁾ ◚℧ṮKᩗ ⻋᧧ ᔵ ᔦ೪ ⋃దỶ ๖ኞ ῶ₞⁢ᆂ ⰶఎൂఊ.

3.2. ఎ‪⋮ჯ

Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ஺ ₶◚⁾ ᔦ೪Ԧ ả 3.6Ỷ ₚኚ؆

ఎ‪῏℧⋮ჯₚ ◂἖₺؎⃒Ỷ ᝪ⹾ἒ ả 800 kg/m3 Ṫ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ᕖ⺏ ᰂ ◂἖؎⃒ኢ 100% ❾⽾⺆ ףῖ

⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ₶◚⁾ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ⋃దኢ Ԧ⅞὎ఊ. ₚᄒ⺂ ఎ

‪⋮ჯ ⋃ద஺ ݖ↚ ڒ↖ᑢỶ ద⺂ ᘚᬾᘚԻ ᰂ ڒ↖ᑢ

⁾ ఎ᎚ᅋỶ ἧ⻋ ᔞ❾ֲ െ ֩ₚ᎖ ⯟ギ, ٶჯ⁾ ٶ

᎚ⴒ⃋ ᰂ ؆℻⹾∷⁾ ⋃దỶ ๖ኞ ڒ↖ᑢ ఎ᎚ᅋỶ ᗦ

⽺ኢ া⧦৚ֲ െ ֩⁢ᆂ ⰶఎൂఊ. Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ᆂ ❾⽾ൂ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞⁾ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ❇℻זآ, Table 6آ Կₚ ݖ↚⁾ ٶ᎚⃒ⴒ⃋ ᔵ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ⴒ⃋ ᘚᬾ⃒₞

PMC⁾ 2.27 t/m3Ỷ ᝪ⹾ἒ ả 18% ⋃Ԧൂ 2.67 t/m3 ᆂ ❇℻ാỮఊ. ₚᄒ⺂ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ⋃ద஺ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ⴒ⃋

ᔵ ᘚᬾ ᰂỶ஺ ⫆؛ᚦỶ ⹾∷ₚ ₷῏⹾ἒ ⦖ ᑞ⅂Ԧ Ử⁢া ٶჯآ Կ⁦ ڒ↖ᑢ⁾ ףῖ ٶჯ ᯒႾᜲ ทỶ ἧ⻋ ᔞ➆ ֩⁢ᆂ ⰶఎാ᎖, ܞ ἧ⻋⁾ ℻೪Ԧ Ợዮ

₞⋦ ⳯Ԧ⹾؆₶ ⹾ἦఊ.

Table 4. Specific mix of the PMC and EFS-Con W/C S/a Unit mass(kg/m

3

)

% % W C Latex S G

PRCC 38 55 76 360 115 922 777

EFS-Con 38 47 89 300 51 1,212* 1,020

*Electric arc furnace slag sand 100%

Table 5. Results of the strength test

Strengths Specimens

Curing time(MPa) 4hrs. 1day 7days

Compressive

PMC 34.1 34.9 46.5

EFS-Con 36.9 52.6 55.8

Flexural

PMC 6.0 7.4 8.1

EFS-Con 7.6 10.1 10.7

Adhesive

PMC 1.5 2.0 2.8

EFS-Con 1.5 2.7 2.7

Table 6. Change of unit weight

Specimens # 1 # 2 # 3 Average Remark PMC 2.28 2.26 2.27 2.27t/ 100%

EFS-Con 2.68 2.69 2.66 2.67t/ 118%

(5)

4. ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋ ᰂ ؆℻⹾∷ ⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞఎ᎚ᅋ

֦⫆

4.1. ℧῏ద᧧ ᔵ ᩊתᗦᬾ

Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞኢ ❾⽾⺂ ٶ᎚⃒ⴒ⃋⁾ Ի೪⯟ᩗ

⁦ ጊῖ ῖᬾ⺂ ֩⁢ᆂ ⳯ԦാỮ⁢া, ఎ‪⋮ჯₚ ݖ↚

⡾⦒ዒ⯞ దᝪ ả 18% ⋃దാ஺ ֩⁢ᆂ ❇℻ാỚ ݖ

↚ ڒ↖ᑢỶ ℧῏ ᰂ ڒ↖℧ ֖೿Ỷ ἧ⻋⁆ᑚỶ ద⺂

֦⫆Ԧ Ὰڒാ஺ ֩⁢ᆂ ⳯ԦാỮఊ. ๖Ⴂᩂ, ᘞ ἖ڒ Ỷᩂ஺ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ᰊ❇❾ኢ ₚ῏⹾ἒ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ᧧⻋

↖℻, ᰊ⅂ ٶჯ⁾ ٶ᎚⃒ⴒ⃋ ℧῏ ᰂ ٶჯ ᧧ᚦ ڒ↖

ᑢỶ ᔞ❾஺ ἧ⻋ Ԧ⃋ దⶂ℧⁢ᆂ ℧῏ാ؆ ₮஺

4Ԧ⋦ ⼻ᰃ⁾ ٶჯ ᩆ℻⹾ἒ ֦⫆⹾ἦఊ. ᰊ⅂ ῶᩊ תỶ ᔾἧൂ ٶჯ⁾ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⁦ ఎ‪⋮ჯ 23 kN/m3 Ṫᯊⰺ⯞⡾⦒ዒ⯞ⴒ⃋ ⃒ᇲἦ⁢᎖ ₚỶ ద⺂ ڒ↖⺚ᩃ

₶ᇲὦ ٶ᎚⃒ⴒ⃋ ᰂ ݖ↚ ٶჯ ᧧ᚦ ᯒႾᜲ⁾ ₢ᚦ ኢ ⅂֖⹾؆ ⃒ⴒᩊാ஺ PMC؛ᖻ⁾ ⯟ᩗ ؆ᅊ⹾ἒ ⴒ⃋൶߾ኢ ῶᩊתᘚఊ 20 mm ⋃Ԧᰂ⧎ 100 mm ↖֚

آ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾ᰂ⧒ ףῖ ⋃Ԧാ஺ ఎ‪

⋮ჯ 27 kN/m3Ỷ ద⺂ ఎ᎚ᅋ ᔵ ṮK⁎ ᗦ⽺ኢ ڒ↖

⺚ᩃ⹾ἦఊ.

4.2. RC ᯒႾᜲٶ

Table 7⁦ 12 m ఎףԪ RC ᯒႾᜲٶ⁾ ᩊת৚῏

⁢ᆂ, ⴒ⃋൶߾ኢ 80 mmỶᩂ 100 mmᆂ ↖℻⹾؆ ⴒ

⃋ఎ‪⋮ჯ⁦ PMC؛ᖻ⁦ 23 kN/m3, ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖ ᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺂ ףῖ 27 kN/m3⁢ᆂ ᧧⻋↖

℻⺂ ֩ ᝪٶ ᔵ ֦⫆⹾ἦఊ. Table 8⁾ ఎ᎚ᅋ ἧ⻋ ֦⫆ኢ ᧚Ⳛᘚ᎚ ⴒ⃋⹾∷, ؆℻⹾∷ ᔵ ఎ᎚ᅋ ₚ ⴒ⃋൶߾ 80 mm, ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋ ఎ‪⋮ჯ 23 kN/m3 ῶᩊת దᝪ⹾ἒ ⴒ⃋൶߾ 100 mmᆂ ⋃Ԧൂ PMC ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⁾ ףῖ 1.3%, ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ ᆂ ❾⽾⺮ ףῖ 2.4% ⋃Ԧ⺎ ᘚ₞ఊ. ༶⺂, ᩊת ఎ᎚ᅋ ֦⫆⺂ זآ, ᩊת⹾∷ ↖⺏᧧ ؆℻⹾∷⁾

⋃ԦתᬾԦ ⾂⹾∷ ⋃Ԧתᬾᘚఊ ᧧ద℧⁢ᆂ ℧⁦ ֩

⁢ᆂ া⧦৒ఊ. ๖Ⴂᩂ, ῶᩊתὦ ᩊתṮK⁎ ᝪٶ

⺂ זآ Table 9ὦ Կₚ PMC ؛ᖻ₞ ףῖ 1.0%,

₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺮ ףῖ 1.7%

℻೪ ṮK⁎ₚ Զ᪲⹾஺ ֩⁢ᆂ ⺚ᩃാỮఊ. ֦⫆זآ ݖ ᩊתൂ ٶჯỶ ∢Ớ⋪ ↖֚⁢ᆂ ⴒ⃋൶߾ ᔵ ఎ‪

⋮ჯₚ ả 18% ℻೪ ᧧⻋↖℻ ാ౺Ⴂ೪ ٶჯ⁾ ṮK

⁎ Զ᪲ჯ⁦ 2% ᔞዲₚᓦᆂ, ڒ↖℧⁢ᆂ ṮK⺂ ֩

⁢ᆂ ⰶఎാỮఊ.

Table 7. Specification of RC slab bridge

Marking Length Width Rating Curve fc fy

Bridge factors 12m 25.8m 1 0

o

27 MPa 400 MPa

Cross section

Table 8. Results of the review on RC slab bridge with dead load and section force

Marking Pavement load Dead load Moment at the section Variation of moment at the section Original design

factors

t = 80 mm

Wc = 23 kN/m

3

36.9 kN/m 707.0 kN/m 525.8 kN·m - Structural

analysisvof PMC

t = 100 mm

Wc = 23 kN/m

3

46.2 kN/m 716.2 kN/m 532.7 kN·m 1.3%

Structural analysis of EFS-Con

t = 100 mm

Wc = 27 kN/m

3

54.2 kN/m 724.3 kN/m 538.7 kN·m 2.4%

(6)

4.3. RC Ⴂ፾ٶ

Table 10⁦ 15 m ఎףԪ RC Ⴂ፾ٶ⁾ ῶᩊת ৚῏

⁢ᆂ ⴒ⃋൶߾ኢ 100 mmᆂ ↖℻⹾؆ ⴒ⃋ఎ‪⋮ჯ⁦

PMC ؛ᖻ⁦ 23 kN/m3,₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ

❾⽾⺂ ףῖ 27 kN/m3⁢ᆂ ᧧⻋↖℻⹾ἒ ڒ↖⺚ᩃ

ᰊᰂ⹾ἦఊ. ᩊתఎ᎚ᅋ ῶᩊתὦ⁾ ఎ᎚ᅋآ ᝪٶ⹾

ἒ ṮK⁎ ᝪٶ⺂ זآ, Table 11⁾ ఎ᎚ᅋ೪ὦ Table 12⁾ ṮK⁎ ֦⫆ὦ Կₚ ⴒ⃋൶߾Ԧ 80 mmỶᩂ 100 mmᆂ ⋃ԦാỚ ⃒ⴒ⃋ാ஺ PMC⁾ ףῖ 1.2%, ₺

؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺮ ףῖ 2.2% ℻೪ ṮK⁎ₚ Զ᪲⹾ἦఊ. ֦⫆זآ ݖ ᩊתൂ ٶჯỶ ∢Ớ

⋪ ↖֚⁢ᆂ ⴒ⃋൶߾ ᔵ ఎ‪⋮ჯₚ ᧧⻋↖℻ ാ౺Ⴂ ೪ ٶჯ⁾ ṮK⁎⁦ ả 2% ℻೪ Զ᪲ാỮ⁢া, K◚℧

₞ ṮK⁎ ❇᎚Ỷᩂ஺ ṮK⁎ Զ᪲ჯₚ ጊῖ ᔞ᪲⹾ἒ, ڒ↖℧⁢ᆂ ṮK⺂ ֩⁢ᆂ ⺚ᩃാỮఊ.

4.4. PSC Beam ٶ

Table 13⁦ PSC Beamٶ⁾ ᩊת ৚῏⁢ᆂ 30 m PSC BeamٶỶ ద⺂ ⴒ⃋൶߾ ᔵ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋◚ ఎ‪⋮ჯ

⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞ ڒ↖⺚ᩃ ᰊᰂ⹾ݖ ‪⺂ ᩊת₶ᇲₚ᎖

Table 14⁾ ఎ᎚ᅋ ἧ⻋֦⫆ኢ ᧚Ⳛᘚ᎚, ⴒ⃋⹾∷, ؆

℻⹾∷ ᔵ ఎ᎚ᅋₚ ῶᩊת దᝪ⹾ἒ PMC⁾ ףῖ

Table 9. Evaluate safety factor in RC slab bridge section force

Marking Factored moment at the section(M

u

)

Nomina flexural resistance( ΦM

n

)

Safety factor ( ΦM

n

/M

u

)

Decrease of safety factor Original design

factors

t=80 mm

W

c

=23 kN/ 1337 kN·m/m 1959 kN·m/m 1.465 -

Structural analysis of PMC

t=100 mm

W

c

=23 kN/ 1346 kN·m/m 1959 kN·m/m 1.455 1.0%

Structural analysis of EFS-Con

t=100 mm

W

c

=27 kN/ 1353 kN·m/m 1959 kN·m/m 1.448 1.7%

Table 10. Specification of RC rigid-frame bridge

Marking Length Width Rating Curve fc fy

Bridge factors 15 m 10.7 m 1 0° 27 MPa 400 MPa

Cross section

Table 11. Results of the section force diagram

Original design factors Structural analysis of PMC Structural analysis of EFS-Con

(7)

2.2%, ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺮ ףῖ 2.8% ⋃Ԧ⺎ ᘚ₞ఊ. ᔺఋⰶỶ ద⺂ ᩊתఎ᎚ᅋ ᗦ⽺

ኢ ῶᩊת ఎ᎚ᅋآ ṮK⁎ ᝪٶ⺂ זآ, Table 15ὦ Կₚ PMC ؛ᖻ⁾ ףῖ 1.6%, ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒ Ⴞܞᆂ ❾⽾⺮ ףῖ 1.7%℻೪ ṮK⁎ₚ Զ᪲⹾া, ڒ

↖℧⁢ᆂ ᑞ⅂ℶ⁦ Ử ֩⁢ᆂ ⰶఎാỮఊ.

4.5. Steel Box Girder ٶ

Table 16⁦ Steel Box girderٶ⁾ ῶᩊת ৚῏⁢ᆂ

2 × 45 = 90 m Steel Box Girderٶ⁾ ⴒ⃋൶߾ኢ 100 mm ᆂ ↖℻⹾؆, ⴒ⃋ఎ‪⋮ჯ PMC؛ᖻ⁦ 23 kN/m3,

؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺂ ףῖ 27 kN/m3⁢ᆂ

᧧⻋↖℻⺂ ֩ ᝪٶ ᔵ ֦⫆⹾ἦఊ. Table 17⁾ ᔺఋ ⰶ⁾ ᩊתఎ᎚ᅋ ῶᩊת ఎ᎚ᅋآ ṮK⁎ ᝪٶ⺂ ז آ PMC ؛ᖻ⁾ ףῖ 1.2%, ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾ ܞᆂ ❾⽾⺮ ףῖ 1.4%℻೪ ṮK⁎ₚ Զ᪲⹾ἦఊ.

Table 18آ Կₚ ∢⼻ ⁷ᅋ֦⫆זآ, PMC ؛ᖻ⁾

ףῖ ᧧἖⁷ᅋₚ ⚂ద 2.5%, ⹾἖⁷ᅋₚ ⚂ద 1.5%

Table 12. Evaluate safety factor in RC rigid-frame bridge

Marking

Factored moment at the section, M

u

(kN·m)

Nomina flexural resistance, ΦM

n

(kN·m) Safety factor ( ΦM

n

/M

u

)

Decrease of safety factor Edge Center Edge Center

Original design factors

t = 80 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

1180 1042 1633 1564 1.384 -

Structural analysis of PMC

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

1190 1051 1633 1564 1.372 1.2%

Structural analysis of EFS-Con

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 27 kN/m

3

1199 1059 1633 1564 1.362 2.2%

Table 13. Specification of PSC Beam Bridge

Marking Length Width Rating Curve fc fy

Bridge factors 30 m 12.6 m 1 0

o

27 MPa 400 MPa

Cross section

Table 14. Results of the review on PSC beam bridge with dead load and section force

Marking Pavement load Dead load Moment

at the section

Variation of moment at the section Original design

factors

t = 80 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

0.920 kN/m 14.985 kN 9.277 kN·m - Structural analysis

of PMC

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

1.150 kN/m 15.425 kN 9.484 kN·m 2.2%

Structural analysis of EFS-Con

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 27 kN/m

3

1.350 kN/m 15.625 kN 9.534 kN·m 2.8%

(8)

Զ᪲⹾ἦ⁢᎖, ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺮

 ףῖ ᧧἖⁷ᅋ ⚂ద 3.2%, ⹾἖⁷ᅋₚ ⚂ద 2.1%

ṮK⁎ₚ Զ᪲⹾ἦఊ. ṮK⁎ ₶◚஺ 125% ₚ᧧ ⽻ ᘚ⹾؆ ₮⁢ᓦᆂ ڒ↖℧ ᑞ⅂ℶ⁦ Ử஺ ֩⁢ᆂ ⺚ᩃാ

Ữఊ.

5. ז ᆆ

ᘞ ἖ڒỶᩂ஺ ₺؎⃒ኢ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ❾⽾⺂

؆Ի೪ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⁾ ؆℻⹾∷ ⋃ԦỶ ద⺂ ἧ

⻋ ֦⫆⹾ݖ ‪⹾ἒ ⼪⃒ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋Ỷᩂ ਸ਼ዒ ℧῏ാ

؆ ₮஺ PMC ؛ᖻآ ᝪٶᚪᩃ⹾ἒ ఊ⁲آ Կ⁦ זᆆ

 ỡ ᬾ ₮Ữఊ.

1.⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ₺؎⃒ ݖ∦Ỷ ጄ஺ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾ ܞኢ ₚ῏⹾ἒ ☮᪳ף Ⴂ⩳ᯊ Ղ⋮ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ኢ ⅂↖⺆

ףῖ, ᯒႾܞᆂ ₞⺂ ⁆೿ᩗ ⋃Ԧᆂ ₞⺂ ᑢ-ᰂ፾⯞ᝪ Ω⹾, સ⁦ ᰊ℧⁎آ ᔦ೪⁾ ἧ⻋⁢ᆂ ᰂ፾⯞ჯ ΩԶ ท

⁾ ⿎آኢ ỡ ᬾ ₮Ữఊ. ༶⺂ Ի೪⯟ᩗỶᩂ೪ ݖ↚

⁾ ☮᪳ף ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ᘚఊ ṻ⚻Ի೪, ぎԻ೪, ᚦ╏Ի೪ Ꮞ

൶ ῖᬾ⺂ Ի೪ᕂ⼪ া⧦৚Ớ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞኢ

Table 15. Evaluate safety factor in PSC Beam bridge

Marking Factored moment at the section(M

u

)

Nomina flexural resistance( ΦM

n

)

Safety factor ( ΦM

n

/M

u

)

Decrease of safety factor Original design

factors

t = 80 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

69.780 91.720 1.314 -

Structural analysis of PMC

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

70.655 91.720 1.298 1.6%

Structural analysis of EFS-Con

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 27 kN/m

3

70.720 91.720 1.297 1.7%

Table 16. Specification of steel box girder bridge

Length Width Rating Curve fc fy

90 m 12.455 m 1 0° 27 MPa 400 MPa

Table 17. Evaluate safety factor in steel box girder bridge

Marking Factored moment at

the section(M

u

)

Nomina flexural resistance( ΦM

n

)

Safety factor ( ΦM

n

/M

u

)

Variation of safety factor Original design

factors

t = 80 mm

Wc = 23 kN/m

3

83.480 116.77 1.399 -

Structural analysis of PMC

t = 100 mm

Wc = 23 kN/m

3

84.196 116.77 1.387 1.2%

Structural analysis of EFS-Con

t = 100 mm

Wc = 27 kN/m

3

84.294 116.77 1.385 1.4%

Table 18. Evaluate principal stress in steel box girder bridge(maximum negative-flexure section)

Marking

Upper stress( MPa) Lover stress( MPa)

Stress Allowable stress

Safety factor ( ΦM

n

/M

u

)

Decrease of

safety factor Stress Allowable stress

Safety factor ( ΦM

n

/M

u

)

Decrease of safety factor Original

design factors

t = 80 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

138.8 190 1.369 - 172.1 218 1.267 -

Structural analysis of

PMC

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 23 kN/m

3

141.4 190 1.344 2.5% 174.1 218 1.252 1.5%

Structural analysis of

EFS-Con

t = 100 mm

W

c

= 27 kN/m

3

142.1 190 1.337 3.2% 174.9 218 1.246 2.1%

(9)

ₚ῏⺂ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞ ⅂↖Ԧ Ԧோ⹾ἒ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞ

₺؎⃒⁾ ᧒῏ᩗ ⽻₞⹾ἦఊ.

2.Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞᆂ ₺؎⃒ኢ 100% ❾⽾⺆ ףῖ, ᯒႾܞ ₶◚⁾ સ⁦ ఎ‪⋮ჯ⁢ᆂ ₞⹾ἒ ₢ᔾ ⡾⦒ዒ

⯞Ỷ ᝪ⹾ἒ 18% ℻೪ ఎ‪⋮ჯₚ ⋃Ԧ⹾஺ ֩⁢ᆂ ❇

℻ാỮ⁢᎖ ₚᄒ⺂ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞⁾ ఎ‪⋮ჯ ⋃ԦỶ ద⺂

ڒ↖ᑢ ఎ᎚ᅋ ᗦ⽺⁾ ἧ⻋ ᚪᩃ⺂ זآ, 100 mmᆂ ⴒᩊൂ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⁾ ףῖ ⴒ⃋⹾∷ ⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞ K◚

؆℻⹾∷⁦ ả 1 ~ 2% ₚ৚ᆂ ⋃Ԧ⹾஺ ֩⁢ᆂ ⺚ᩃ

ാỮఊ.

3.؆℻⹾∷ ⋃ԦỶ ๖ኞ ⹾∷↖⺏Ỷ ⁾⺂ ᚦ⃒ᅋ(ᩊ תᏎ፾⯞)⁦ ⴒ⃋൶߾ 100 mm ᔵ ఎ‪⋮ჯ 27 kN/m3

↖֚Ỷᩂ ả 2% ₚ৚ᆂ ⋃ԦാỮ⁢᎖ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋⹾∷ ⋃ ԦỶ ๖ኞ ద᧧ ڒ↖ᑢ⁾ ఎ᎚֦⫆ኢ ᬾ⺯⺂ זآ, ఎ

᎚ ṮK⁎(⻮῏⁷ᅋ/ᕂᨃ⁷ᅋ)ₚ ả 3% ₚ৚ᆂ Զ᪲⹾

஺ ֩⁢ᆂ া⧦৒ఊ. ܞᄒা ݖ ᩊתൂ ڒ↖ᑢₚ ⛏ᚪ

⺂ ᩊת ṮK⁎ ⽻ᘚ⹾؆ ₮஺ ᧧⨂ₚ᎖, ⴒ⃋⹾∷ ⋃ ԦỶ ⁾⺚ ఎ᎚ ṮK⁎ Զ᪲ჯₚ ጊῖ ᔞ᪲⹾ἒ Kݖᆂ ᧖⽺ᯒႾܞኢ ₚ῏⺂ ᘚᬾ⃒⁾ ٶ᎚ⴒ⃋ ℧῏ ᰂ ఎ‪

⋮ჯ ⋃Ԧᆂ ₞⺚ ڒ↖ᑢ⁾ ڒ↖℧ ṮKᩗỶ஺ ἧ⻋

ᔞ❾⋦ Ṱ஺ ֩⁢ᆂ ⺚ᩃാỚ ᧖ừᚦ᧖ᑢ₞ Kݖᆂ ᧖

⽺ᯒႾܞ⁾ ⡾⦒ዒ⯞῏ ₺؎⃒ᆂᩂ⁾ ᧒῏ᩗ ᔵ ⾂῏ᩗ

 ౺ ῗ ਹザ ᬾ ₮ ֩⁢ᆂ ⰶఎാỮఊ.

Զ᧒⁾ ܦ

ᘞ ἖ڒ஺ 2011੪ ړ⫆⺚ặᚦ ֚ᩊٶ⫛R&D℻╫₞⸪

Ⴂ ݖᭆ᧒ừ⁾ ἖ڒᝪ ⋦ῶ(آ⅂ᖮ⽞ 11TRPI-C057479- 01)Ỷ ⁾⺚ ᬾ⺯ൂ ֩⁢ᆂ ₚỶ Զ᧒ขዣ௮ఊ.

╞؆ᑞ⻲

1. Son U. S et al., 2010 : The Shrinkage Characteristics of Concrete in Using Oxidized Electric-Furnace Slag Aggregate, Spring Conference of the Korea Concrete Institute, pp. 253- 254.

2. Jo B. S et al., 2009 : Appraisal of Concrete Performance and Plan for Stable Use of EAF Oxidizing Slag as Fine Aggregate of Concrete, Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, 21(3), pp. 367-375.

3. Lee H. H et al., 2008 : Utilization of Electric Arc Furnace Stainless Steel Oxidizing Slag as Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete, RIST, 22(1), pp. 60-68.

4. Kim S. M et al., 2008 : Study on Utilization of Electric Arc Furnace Oxidizing Slag as Fine Aggregates for Cement Concrete, Journal of Korea Civil Engineering, 28(3A), pp.

407-415.

5. Moon H. Y et al., 2002 : Utilization of Electric Arc Furnace Slag and Converter Slag after Aging for Concrete Aggregate, Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, 14(4), pp. 597-607.

6. Jung W. K et al., 2012 : Study of Polymer Rapid Setting Cement Concrete Using Electric Arc Furnace Oxidizing Slag Aggregate, Journal of the Korean Institute of Resources Recycling, 21(1), pp. 30-40.

7. Korea Iron & Steel Association, 2012 : www.kosa.or.kr

㼔 㳱 ㈋

• ⼪⃒ (∢)᧢ῖIMC ݖᭆ἖ڒ᪲ ᩆ₪

἖ڒῶ

• ట ⹿⾲⋦ ⅂21ڲ 1⽞ ╞↖

㏧ 㲵 㨁

• ⼪⃒ (∢)᧢ῖIMC ݖᭆ἖ڒ᪲

ᩆ₪἖ڒῶ

• ట ⹿⾲⋦ ⅂21ڲ 1⽞ ╞↖

㺮 㞹 㿀

• Իኯద⹿ٶ ⫆Ꮟ؛⹿آ ؛⹿ᔻ᧒

• ⼪⃒ (∢)᧢ῖIMC ݖᭆ἖ڒ᪲

ᩆ₪἖ڒῶ

수치

Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of rapid-set cement Time of setting Fineness
Table 3. EFS sieving separation results Size
Table 4. Specific mix of the PMC and EFS-Con W/C S/a Unit mass(kg/m 3 )
Table 8. Results of the review on RC slab bridge with dead load and section force
+4

참조

관련 문서

The results showed that the increment of compressive strength development by 10~20%. The flexural strength of EFS-Con increased greatly as the electric arc furnace