지식닷컴

(1)

시험문제 FPA(FIFA Players' Agent)

지식닷컴

cafe.daum.net/sports31 ☎02)849-4301

EXAMINATION PAPER

Please Read a next illustrative sentence and answer the question to ask.

The chilean player Hernandez(born on December 1, 1983) played since 7 years of age for the Mexican club, Iron Warriors.

September 15, 2001, Hernandez signed his first contract of not-amateur with the Mexican club, Mexico city Lions. This contract of employment between Hernandez and the club Mexico City Lions applies to the period from September 15, 2001 to August 30, 2004. The Argentinean players' agent, Sancho took part in the signature of the contract. May 5, 2001, Sancho had concluded a contract of mediation with Mexico City Lions for the transfer of the Hernandez to the club Mexico City Lions. August 10, 2002, the agent of Sancho player approached Hernandez and signed with him a contract of mediation. The aforementioned contract of mediation is valid from August 10, 2002 to August 9, 2004 and aims as soon as possible to transfer Hernandez towards a European Club. Sancho omitted to inform the club Mexico City Lions of the signature of the contract of mediation with Hernandez player.

Question 1

Is there doubles prohibited representation on behalf of the agent of Sancho players?

a) Yes.

b) To answer this question, it is advisable to consult the

corresponding payments of the Argentinean Federation of Football c) not.

d) All the answers are correct e) No answer is correct.

(2)

지식닷컴

Question 2

Which of the following assertions applies to exposed facts?

a) Sancho behaved in a completely correct way.

b) Sancho has infringed on art 14c) of regulation controlling the activity of the agents of players of the FIFA, because it approached Hernandez in the intention to lead it to cancel his contract of employment prematurely or not to respect the rights and obligations stipulated in the contract.

c) Sancho does not infringe art. 14c) of the payment controlling the activity of the agents of players of the FIFA that if the Hernandez player prematurely cancelled indeed his contract of employment with the club Mexico City Lions.

d) All the answers are correct.

e) No answer is correct.

Question 3

Let us admit that there actually was violation of art. 12.c) of the regulation controlling the activity of the agents of players of the FIFA.

Could Sancho be sanctioned?

a) No, the only violation of art. 14.c) cannot involve any sanction.

b) All the sanctions envisaged can be applied. The sanctions can be even accumulated.

c) Yes, but only a fine could be marked.

Question 4

Who would be in charge to impose a possible sanction in this case?

a) The Mexican Federation of Football.

b) Commission of the Statute of the player of the FIFA.

c) the Argentinean Federation of Football.

(3)

지식닷컴

Question 5

Which of the following assertions is right, if the contract of mediation concluded on August 10, 2002 until August 9, 2005 ?

a) As Sancho and Hernandez are both of agreement over the duration of the contract, there is no problem.

b) A contract of one duration mediation higher than two years is only possible if the national law concerned allows it.

c) a contract of one duration mediation higher than two years is not allowed

e) No answer is correct

해설

이 문제는 년 월에 시행된 시험의 문제입니다 이 당시는 지선다형 문제로 출제되

1) 2003 3 . 5

었습니다 지금은 지선다형으로 바뀌었습니다. 3 .

위 문제처럼 영어로 출제되므로 영문을 읽고 어느 정도 해석할 수 있어야 합니다

2) .

앞으로 남은 기간 동안 지속적으로 기출문제를 공개할 예정입니다

3) .

이 시험은 상대평가가 아니고 일정 수준 이상의 점수를 받으면 모두 합격하는 절대평가

4) ,

방식이므로 기출문제를 갖고 계신 분께서는 이를 공유하면 더 많은 사람들이 합격할 수 있습니다 기출문제를 갖고 계신 분들의 더욱 많은 참여를 바랍니다 보다 자세한 내용은. . 아래 카페에서 확인하시기 바랍니다.

다음카페 : http://cafe.daum.net/sports31/Isrb/62 네이버카페 : http://cafe.naver.com/sportsport/7032