• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

A Study on the Percentage of Body Fat and Abdominal Obesity of Workers Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Study on the Percentage of Body Fat and Abdominal Obesity of Workers Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis"

Copied!
11
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

서 론

,

1) .

,

2-4) .

3) . ,

박영선, 김종대 Original Article

A Study on the Percentage of Body Fat and Abdominal Obesity of Workers Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

Young-Sun Park, Jong-Dae Kim

Daegu Oriental Hospital of Daeguhaany University

Objectives: Obesity is chronic condition which can severely influence health. People with a high percentage of body fat (%BF) have high prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Abdominal obesity (AO) seems to play a major role in the development of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and hyperlipidemia. This study investigated the

%BF and AO of workers in the automobile manufacturing industry.

Methods: The subjects were categorized by sex, age, job class, drinking history and smoking history. %BF and AO were measured by using bioelectrical impedance analysis (Jawon Medical, Seoul, Korea). We analyzed the relationship between age, sex, job class, drinking history, smoking history and %BF and WHR into frequencies, χ

2

-test using the SPSS Ver. 12.0.

Results: Regarding the relationship between sex and %BF, AO, there was statistically significant difference as men had a significant higher level of %BF and AO than women. There was a positive correlation between age and both

%BF and AO. Workers in their 40s especially ran level of AO up. In job class, office workers were apt to have a higherlevel of %BF and AO than production line workers. %BF and AO of the non-drinker group showed a lower level than the drinker group. On the other hand, the ex-smoker group had higher levels of %BF and AO than the non-smoker or current-smoker groups.

Conclusions: The above results showed that men, the advanced in years, office workers, drinkers and ex-smokers had high levels of %BF and AO.

Key Words : percentage body fat (%BF), abdominal obesity (AO), bioelectrical impedance

2008 4 29 2008 7 8

: ,

(Tel : +82-53-770-2107, Fax : +82-53-770-2055,

E-mail : [email protected])

(2)

4) .

.

5-6) .

, , ,

7) .

(percentage body fat, %BF)

. (abdominal obesity, AO)

8-9) .

2005

4 2005 11 ( )

.

연구대상 및 방법

1.

연구대상

2005 4 11 8

( )

, 25,393

14 25,379

.

2.

연구방법

1) , , ,

, ,

.

,

, ,

.

2) X-scan plus(Jawon

medical, Seoul, Korea)

.

(%)

, - (WHR)

.

Hypo Normal Hyper

%BF

(%) Male under 15 15 ~ 20 over 20

Female under 20 20 ~ 30 over 30

AO

Male under 0.75 0.75 ~ 0.90 over 0.90

Female under 0.70 0.70 ~ 0.85 over 0.85

percentage body fat,

abdominal obesity

Table 1.

(3)

‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘

’ (Table 1).

3.

통계분석

SPSS Version 12.0

, p<0.05

.

, (χ 2 -test) .

결 과

1.

검진대상자의 일반적 특성

24,759 97.5%, 634 2.5%

. 41.7±6.66 20-30

9.4%, 31-40 28.9%, 41-50 53.4%, 51

8.3% . (

) 65.5%, ( ) 11.9%, (

) 1.5%, 21.1% .

14.8%, 68.9%,

16.3% ,

26.7%, 36.9%, 15.2%,

21.2% (Table 2).

2.

검진대상자의 체지방률과 복부비만

25,379

‘ ’ 72.5%, ‘ ’ 22.2%, ‘

’ 5.3% , ‘

’ 58.7%, ‘ ’ 40.1%, ‘ ’ 1.1%

(Table 3).

Variables Number (%) Variables Number (%)

Sex Male 24759 (97.5) Drinking Non-drinker 3755 (14.8)

Female 634 (2.5) Drinker 17484 (68.9)

No answer 4154 (16.3) Age(years) 20 ~30 2388 (9.4)

31 ~40 7327 (28.9) Smoking Non-smoker 6782 (26.7)

41 ~50 13549 (53.4) Current-smoker 9361 (36.9)

Over 51 2129 (8.3) Ex-smoker 3856 (15.2)

No answer 5394 (21.2) Business Production employee 16625 (65.5)

management Office worker 3018 (11.9) Etc. 380 (1.5) No answer 5370 (21.1) Table 2.

Hypo Normal Hyper

%BF

(%) 1342 (5.3%) 5631 (22.2%) 18406 (72.5%)

AO

§

300 (1.1%) 10166 (40.1%) 14913 (58.7%)

‡: percentage body fat, §: abdominal obesity

Table 3.

(4)

3.

체지방률과 복부비만 교차분석 결과 1)

‘ ’

49.3% 21.5% , ‘

’ 73.2% 48.0%

.

‘ ’

54.5% ‘ ’

59.1% ,

(Table 4).

Age

*

%BF Age

*

AO

Total

Hypo Normal Hyper Hypo Normal Hyper

20 ~30

N 342 811 1232 190 2153 42 2385

Row(%) 14.3 34.0 51.7 7.9 90.4 1.7 100

Column(%) 25.5 14.4 6.7 61.7 21.2 0.3 9.4

31 ~40

N 439 1774 5111 82 4759 2483 7324

Row(%) 6.0 24.2 69.8 1.1 65.0 33.9 100

Column(%) 32.7 31.5 27.8 26.6 46.8 16.6 28.9

41 ~50

N 514 27.34 10298 28 2977 10541 13546

Row(%) 3.8 20.2 76.0 0.2 22.0 77.8 100

Column(%) 38.3 48.6 55.9 9.1 29.2 70.7 53.4

51 ~

N 47 312 1765 8 275 1841 2124

Row(%) 2.2 14.7 83.1 0.3 12.9 86.8 100

Column(%) 3.5 5.5 9.6 2.6 2.7 12.4 8.4

Total

N 1342 5631 18406 308 10164 14907 25379

Row(%) 5.3 22.2 72.5 1.2 40.1 58.7 100

Column(%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

χ

2

-test p-value: 0.000 Table 5.

Sex * %BF Sex * AO

Total

Hypo Normal Hyper Hypo Normal Hyper

Female

N 17 312 304 0 345 288 633

Row(%) 2.7 49.3 48.0 0 54.5 45.5 100

Column(%) 1.3 5.5 1.7 0 3.4 1.9 2.5

Male

N 1325 5319 18102 310 9821 14615 24746

Row(%) 5.4 21.5 73.2 1.2 39.7 59.1 100

Column(%) 98.7 94.5 98.3 100 96.6 98.1 97.5

Total

N 1342 5631 18406 310 10166 14903 25379

Row(%) 5.3 22.2 72.5 1.1 40.1 58.8 100

Column(%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

χ

2

-test p-value: 0.000

Table 4.

(5)

2)

‘ ’ 20 30

51.7%, 31-40 69.8%, 41-50 76.0%, 50 83.1%

.

‘ ’ ‘ ’

.

‘ ’ ‘ ’

.

41 50 , 50 ‘ ’

77.8%, 86.8% , 40

(Table 5).

3)

5,370

11 20,012

‘ ’

5.8%, 3.2% , ‘

’ 71.9%, 76.8%

.

‘ ’ ‘ ’

3.1% 42.3% , 1.0%

25.5% , ‘

’ 54.6%, 73.5%

(Table 6).

4)

21,239

, ‘ ’

26.2% 21.2%

, ‘ ’ 73.2%

66.9%

.

‘ ’

58.9% 55.3%

(Table 7).

Business management * %BF Business management * AO

Total

Hypo Normal Hyper Hypo Normal Hyper

Production employee

N 956 3707 11952 513 7031 9071 16615

Row (%) 5.8 22.3 71.9 3.1 42.3 54.6 100

Column (%) 89.2 83.8 82.3 94.3 88.8 78.5 83.0

Office worker

N 97 603 2317 30 768 2219 3017

Row (%) 3.2 20.0 76.8 1.0 25.5 73.5 100

Column (%) 9.0 13.6 16.0 5.5 9.7 19.2 15.1

etc

N 19 116 245 1 118 261 380

Row (%) 5.0 30.5 64.5 0.2 31.1 68.7 100

Column (%) 1.8 2.6 1.7 0.2 1.5 2.3 1.9

Total

N 1072 4426 14514 544 7917 11551 20012

Row (%) 5.4 22.1 72.5 2.7 39.6 57.7 100

Column (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

χ

2

-test p-value: 0.000

Table 6.

(6)

5)

19,999

, ‘ ’

24.0% , ‘ ’

75.7%

.

’ 1.5%, ‘ ’ 42.2%

, ‘ ’ 62%

.(Table 8).

Drinking * %BF Drinking * AO

Total

Hypo Normal Hyper Hypo Normal Hyper

Non-Drinker

N 260 983 2512 55 1625 2075 3755

Row (%) 6.9 26.2 66.9 1.5 43.3 55.2 100

Column (%) 23.2 21.0 16.3 21.2 18.8 16.8 17.7

Drinker

N 869 3703 12912 197 6998 10289 17484

Row (%) 4.9 21.2 73.9 1.1 40.0 58.9 100

Column (%) 76.8 79.0 83.7 78.8 81.2 83.2 82.3

Total

N 1129 4686 15424 252 8623 12364 21239

Row (%) 5.3 22.1 72.6 1.2 40.6 58.2 100

Column (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

χ

2

-test p-value: 0.000 Table 7.

Smoking * %BF Smoking * AO

Total

Hypo Normal Hyper Hypo Normal Hyper

Non- smoker

N 328 1,626 4,828 63 2,758 3,961 6,782

Row (%) 4.8 24.0 71.2 0.9 40.7 58.4 100

Column (%) 30.0 36.7 33.4 27.4 33.9 34.1 33.9

Current- Smoker

N 613 2,021 6,727 136 3,948 5,277 9,361

Row (%) 6.6 21.6 71.9 1.5 42.2 56.3 100

Column (%) 56.0 45.6 46.5 59.1 48.5 45.3 46.8

Ex- smoker

N 154 783 2,919 31 1,434 2,391 3,856

Row (%) 4.0 20.3 75.7 0.8 37.2 62.0 100

Column (%) 14.1 17.7 20.2 13.5 17.6 20.6 19.3

Total

N 1,095 4,430 14,474 230 8,140 11,629 19,999

Row (%) 5.5 22.1 72.4 1.2 40.7 58.1 100

Column (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

χ

2

-test p-value: 0.000

Table 8.

(7)

고 찰

10) .

2) .

6) .

,

, , , ,

6,8) .

( / ) 25 , 30

,

8,11)

.

(%) 20, 30

,

12) .

14 16 , 11 12

50

, 60

.

13) .

- (WHR)

, WHO (2000)

90 , 80

, WHR 0.95 , 0.85

14) .

.

15) .

, , , ,

, ,

.

16-17)

.

20 2005

31.8% 2001 30.6%

18) .

,

, , , ,

19)

, ,

, ,

, , 17) .

, “

” , ,

7,19-20)

.

2005 4 11 8

( )

(8)

25,393 ,

14 25,379

.

.

97.5%, 2.5% ,

41.7±6.66 31 40 28.9%, 41

50 53.4% 31 50 82.3%

. ( ) 65.5%,

( ) 11.9% .

14.8%, 68.9%

, 26.7%,

36.9%, 15.2%

.

.

‘ ’

, ‘ ’

. ‘ ’

, ‘ ’

. ,

, 21)

.

. ,

.

40

. 40

22)

.

, 40

61.7%

.

, ‘ ’

‘ ’ , ‘

. ‘ ’

71.9% 76.8%

, ‘ ’

54.6% 73.5%

.

,

.

, , ,

23) .

.

, .

‘ ’

, ‘

’ .

, 22)

. Kadowaki

(9)

24) 1.55

/ ,

.

25)

, ,

. 26)

, , ,

, ,

,

.

‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’

.

.

.

,

.

27)

75%

.

4) .

, ,

,

.

결 론

2005 4 11 8

( ) 25,393

14 25,379

.

1. ,

, .

2. ,

.

40

.

3. ,

.

(10)

4. ,

.

5. ,

.

참고문헌

1. . (

). 1998:10-2.

2. . :

. . 2006;214:2-3.

3. , , , , ,

, , , . Moire

. . 2000;4(2):72-92.

4. , , , , ,

.

. . 2003;

13(2):135-43.

5. .

. . 1998;8(2):338-46.

6. , , .

,

- -.

. 2000;10(2):59-68.

7. , .

. . 2001;1(1):

33-42.

8. . . : . 2003:

27, 76-84, 90, 197-9.

9. , , , , ,

, , . 2

. . 2006;

30(3):207-13.

10. .

. . 2000;9

(1):30-8.

11. , , .

. . 2007;

50(12):1720-6.

12. , , . ,

. . 1997:15(2):423-31.

13. . (%BF) (BMI)

. . 2005;16(5):

619-26.

14. , .

. . 2004;15(3):1595-604.

15. , , , , . 12

, , .

. 2007;16(1):1-10.

16. . .

. 1988;31(19):933-5.

17. , .

. . 1997;7(1):272-83.

18. . : 2007

. Available from: URL: http://www.kosis.kr

19. . .

: . 2003:349-62.

20. . . :

. 1991:61,94,219-20,275.

21. , .

, .

. 2000;30(4):948-54.

22. , . .

. 2002;11(4):329-36.

23. . . :

. 1996:42.

24. Kadowaki T, Watanabe M, Okatama A,

Hishida K, Okamura T, Miyamatsu N, Haya-

(11)

kawa T, Kita Y, Ueshima H. Continuation of smoking cessation and following weight cha- nge after intervention in a healthy population with high smoking prevalence. J Occup Health. 2006;48:402-6.

25. .

. . 2006;224:7-19.

26. , , , , ,

.

. . 2006;27(11):911-6.

27. .

.

. 2001.

참조

관련 문서

First, the rhythmic gymnastics exercise program improves the skeletal muscle mass of adult women in office workers and reduces body fat percentage,

Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effects of Soru massage therapy on the following variables: fatigue, stress, and obesity-related indexes including weight, waist girth

2) In between-group comparison before and after elastic band exercise, a significant difference was found in the percentage of body fat, fat-free

근래에 연구되는 격자형 모델은 각 경계범위에서 각기 다른 변수의 영향을 정확 하게 산출하지 못하고 있으나 , 수용모델링을 병행하는 경우 높은 정확도를 추정할

This study analyzed the characteristics of smokers in term of structure of household, socioeconomic status and smoking behavior and investigated whether

The biomedicalisation of smoking cessation: a mixed methods study of lay perspectives on nicotine addiction.. Norway's tobacco

Analysis of body characteristics on olive flounder ( Paralichthys oilvaceus ) fed on the extruded and moist pellets (body weight, body length, body height and body width) · ·

As a result of the study, gas membrane module was selected based on the survey of nitrogen charging capacity and using flow rate in the high-pressure