• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

직접인장 및 간접인장 실험방법에 따른 접착식 콘크리트 덧씌우기의 부착강도 비교 고찰

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "직접인장 및 간접인장 실험방법에 따른 접착식 콘크리트 덧씌우기의 부착강도 비교 고찰"

Copied!
11
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

* v෪ᬱᵝݡ⦺Ʊ ☁༊Ŗ⦺ŝ ၶᔍŝᱶ ([email protected])

Received February 12 2013, Revised March 12 2013, Accepted March 15 2013

Copyright ⵑ 2013 by the Korean Society of Civil Engineers

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

 ǣŠ––’ǣȀȀ†šǤ†‘‹Ǥ‘”‰ȀͳͲǤͳʹ͸ͷʹȀ•…‡ǤʹͲͳ͵Ǥ͵͵Ǥ͵Ǥͳͳͷ͵ ™™™Ǥ•…‡Œ‘—”ƒŽǤ‘”Ǥ”

⽿⷏ⴶⵣ#⇍#ᇂ⷏ⴶⵣ#⢢㮖⇧≓⮎#᫮ἶ#⷏㇧⢛#㔖㘪Ὢ㡶#ᤥ⫊ⱮᏮⴖ#

⌾㇧ᇓᦂ#␂ጎ#ኞ㇮

׌ઽָ ȵଲ਎૴

Kim, Young Kyu*, Lee, Seung Woo**

Comparative Study on the Bond Strength between Direct Tensile Test and Indirect Tensile Test for Bonded Concrete Overlay

ABSTRACT

Bonded concrete overlay is a favorable maintenance method since the material properties are similar to existing concrete pavements.

In addition, bonded concrete overlay has advantage of structural performance based on being bonded together, both for the overlay layer and the existing pavement which perform as one monolithic layer. Therefore, it is important to have a suitable bond strength criteria for long term performance of bonded concrete overlay. This study aimed to investigate the affecting of bond strength on various bond characteristics, and to compare the bond strength between direct tensile test and indirect tensile test due to various conditions such as overlay materials, compressive and flexure strength of existing pavement, and deterioration status of existing pavement. As a result of this study, bond strength occurred by both of direct and indirect tensile test due to monotonic load is highly correlated such as coefficient of determination of 0.75 and P-value of 0.002. However, bond strength by indirect tensile test was relatively higher than bond strength by direct tensile test. It was known that correlation between direct and indirect tensile test was possible to use the characteristics analysis of bond fatigue behavior based on bond strength due to cyclic load which can simulate real field behavior of bonded concrete overlay.

Key words : Bonded concrete overlay, Bond strength, Direct tensile test, Indirect tensile test

Ⅹಾ

ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ۵ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆŝ᮹ᰍഭྜྷᖒᯕᮁᔍ⦹ᩍᱢᱩ⦽ᮁḡᅕᙹŖჶᮝಽᱽ᜽ࡹŁᯩᮝ໑, ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ŝʑ᳕⡍

ᰆ⊖ᯕ᪥ᱥᇡ₊ᮥ☖⦽ᯝℕ⪵Ñ࠺ᮥ⦹ᩍᬑᙹ⦽Ǎ᳑ᱢᖒ܆ᮥ⪶ᅕ⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ঑௝ᕽᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᰆʑŖᬊᖒᮥ᭥⦹ᩍ

ᱢᱩ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥʑᵡᮥ⪶ᅕ⦹۵äᯕๅᬑᵲ᫵⦹݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵݅᧲⦽ᇡ₊✚ᖒᯕᇡ₊vࠥᨱၙ⊹۵ᩢ⨆ᮥŁₑ⦹Łᯱ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ߈ ᥭᬑʑᰍഭ, ʑ᳕⡍ᰆ᮹ᦶ⇶vࠥၰ⮉vࠥᄡ⪵, ʑ᳕⡍ᰆ᮹ᩕ⪵ᔢ┽॒݅᧲⦽ᇡ₊᳑Õᨱݡ⦽Ḣᱲᯙᰆၰeᱲᯙᰆᝅ⨹ᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩍࠥ

⇽ࡹ۵ᇡ₊vࠥෝእƱᇥᕾ⦹Łᯱ⦹ᩡ݅. ᩑǍđŝ, Ḣᱲᯙᰆᝅ⨹ᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊vࠥaeᱲᯙᰆᝅ⨹ᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊vࠥᅕ݅ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ׳í

ᇥ⡍⦹۵Ğ⨆ᮥӹ┡ԕŁᯩᮝӹ, đᱶĥᙹ0.75 ၰP-value 0.002᮹׳ᮡᇡ₊vࠥᔢššĥෝ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕෝ☖⦹ᩍᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᝅᱽ⩥ᰆÑ࠺ᮥ༉ᔍ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ၹᅖ⦹ᵲᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊⦝ಽ✚ᖒᇥᕾ᜽Ḣᱲᯙᰆၰeᱲᯙᰆᝅ⨹᮹ᔢššĥෝ⪽ᬊ⧁ᙹᯩᮥä ᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅.

áᔪᨕ ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ, ᇡ₊vࠥ, Ḣᱲᯙᰆᝅ⨹, eᱲᯙᰆᝅ⨹

‹‰Š™ƒ›‰‹‡‡”‹‰

ʪͿėॡ

(2)

1. ᕽು

ǎԕ᮹⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆᮡ88Łᗮࠥಽa}☖ࡽᯕ⬥ᔑᨦ᮹ɪĊ

⦽ၽݍŝᵲ₉ప᮹᷾aಽЙᵡ⦹íᝁᖅၰ⪶ᰆࡹᨩᮝӹ, ↽ɝ

⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹ԕǍᩑ⦽ᯕ20֥ᨱaʭᬭḱᨱ঑௝ฯᮡǍeᨱ ᕽ ᩕ⪵ᨱ᮹⦽ ❭ᗱᯕ ၽᔾࡹᨕᮁḡᅕᙹ ၰ ᰍÕᖅᮥ⦥᫵ಽ

⦹Łᯩ݅. י⬥⪵ࡽ⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆᮡǍ᳑ᱢ/ʑ܆ᱢᖒ܆ᯕqᗭ⦹

ᩍࠥಽᯕᬊᯱ᮹ᇩ⠙ᮥⅩ௹⦹Łᯩ݅. ᯕ᪡zᮡྙᱽෝ⧕đ⦹ʑ

᭥⦽ႊᦩᮝಽי⬥⪵ࡽ⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹ᮁḡᅕᙹ᜽߈ᥭᬑʑ

Ŗჶᮥᱢᬊ⦹Łᯩᮝ໑, ᯕෝ☖⦽ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹Ǎ᳑ᱢ/ʑ

܆ᱢ ᖒ܆ᮥ ⫭ᅖ᜽┅Ł ᯩ݅(ACPA, 2008).

߈ᥭᬑʑŖჶᮡי⬥⪵ࡽ⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆŝ᮹݉ᯝÑ࠺ᮥ᭥⦹

ᩍᮁᔍ⦽ྜྷᖒᮥӹ┡ԕ۵⡍ᰆᰍഭෝᔍᬊ⦹۵äᯕᮁญ⦹ӹ, ǎԕ᮹Ğᬑ᜽ŖĞ⨹ᯕ⣮ᇡ⦹Ł᳑ʑƱ☖}ႊᮥᝅ᜽⧁ᙹᯩ۵

ᦥᜅ❵✙߈ᥭᬑʑŖჶᮥᯝၹᱢᮝಽᔍᬊ⦹Łᯩ݅. ✚⯩⪙ԉŁ ᗮࠥಽݡᱥ ~ ŲᵝǍe᮹Ğᬑ1986֥}☖⬥⩥ᰍʭḡ170km Ǎeᵲ᧞65%ᯙ109kmaᦥᜅ❵✙߈ᥭᬑʑಽ᜽Ŗࡹᨩ݅(ᱶ

᳦޶᫙, 2006). ə్ӹᦥᜅ❵✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹Ğᬑʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍

ᰆŝ᮹ᰍഭྜྷᖒၰᩕ➞₞ĥᙹ॒᮹✚ᖒᯕᔢᯕ⦹ᩍᵥ٩ᇡᨱᕽ

ၽᔾࡹ۵ ၹᔍɁᩕŝ ⧉̹ ⡍✙⪡ ॒᮹ ݅᧲⦽ ⡍ᰆ ❭ᗱᮝಽ

ᯙ⦹ᩍᰇᮡᮁḡᅕᙹෝ᜽⧪⦹Łᯩ݅. ᯕಽᯙ⦹ᩍǎԕ᮹Ğᬑ

⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹⬉ŝᱢᯙᮁḡᅕᙹŖჶᮥ⦥᫵ಽ⦹íࡹᨩᮝ໑, ᦥᜅ❵✙߈ᥭᬑʑŖჶ᮹Ǎ᳑ᱢ❭ᗱᮥᩩႊ⦹ŁŖᬊᖒᮥ⪶ᅕ

⦹ʑ ᭥⦽ ႊᦩᮝಽ ᱲ₊᜾ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑᨱ š⦽ ᩑǍෝ

ᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅(⦽ǎࠥಽŖᔍ, 1997). ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ۵Ʊ

☖ప᷾aၰᵲ₉పᨱݡ⦽⦹ᵲḡḡ܆ಆᯕᬑᙹ⦹Ł, ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ

✙⡍ᰆŝ᮹ᰍഭྜྷᖒᯕᮁᔍ⦹ᩍᮁḡᅕᙹ⬥⡍ᰆ❭ᗱၽᔾᯕ

ᱢ݅۵ᰆᱱᯕᯩ݅. ੱ⦽↽ɝॅᨕ݅᧲⦽ⅩᗮĞᖒᰍഭ᮹᯦ࠥᮝ ಽ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ ᳑ʑ Ʊ☖}ႊ ᖒ܆ᮥ ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩍ ǎԕ

⩥ᰆ ᱢᬊᝅᱢᯕ ᷾a⦹Ł ᯩ۵ ⇵ᖙᯕ݅(ᯕ᜚ᬑ ᫙, 2011).

ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᰆ݉ʑŖᬊᖒᮥ⪶ᅕ⦹ʑ᭥⦽

ႊᦩᮝಽ۵ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖ᯕÕᱥ⧕᧝⦹໑, ᱢᱶᇡ₊ᖒ܆

ᮥ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩍ᪥ᱥᇡ₊ᮥ☖⦽ᯝℕ⪵Ñ࠺ᮥӹ┡ԕ᧝⦽݅. ᱲ₊᜾

⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹Ŗᬊᖒᮥᱡ⦹᜽┅۵ᬱᯙᮝಽ۵Ⓧíᇡ₊

໕ ❭ᗱᨱ ᮹⦹ᩍ Ǎ᳑ᱢ ᖒ܆ᯕ qᗭ⦹۵ äᮝಽ, ᇡ₊໕ᨱᕽ

ᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆၰᙹ⠪ᱥ݉᮲ಆᯕᯥĥ⊹ᨱࠥݍ⦹ᩍᇡ₊vࠥ

ᯕᔢၽᔾ⧁Ğᬑ❭ƕࡹ۵äᯕ݅. ঑௝ᕽᯕᨱݡ⦽ᱢᱩ⦽ᇡ₊v

ࠥ⣩ḩšญʑᵡᯕ᫵Ǎࡽ݅. Peter M. Semen ॒(2005)᮹ᩑǍᨱ

᮹⦹໕1950֥ݡ⬥ၹᯕ⬥ᱥ݉ᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊໕❭ᗱᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍ

ᱥ݉vࠥ1.4MPa(200psi)ᮥ⣩ḩšญʑᵡᮝಽᱽ᜽⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᯕ ᨱ঑ෙᬑᙹ⦽ᰆʑᇡ₊ᖒ܆ᮥ⪶ᅕ⦽äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ə్ӹ

ɝ௹ᨱॅᨕGranju (2001) ၰLange ॒(2001) ॒ᯕᝅ⨹ŝ⧉̹

ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥᄲ⧪⦽ᩑǍđŝෝᔕ⠕ᅕ໕Õ᳑ᙹ⇶ŝ⧉̹᪉ࠥ

ᇡ᪡༉ᕽญᨱᕽၽᔾ⦹۵׳ᮡᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊໕ᯙᰆ

❭ƕaၽᔾ⦹۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ੱ⦽Medina Chavez ॒(2007) ᮹ᩑǍᨱ᮹⦹໕California ᵝᨱᕽ᜽Ŗ⦽י⬥⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ (JPCP) ᭥ᨱ ᱲ₊᜾ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ Ŗჶᮥ ᱢᬊ⦽ ᔍಡෝ

☖⦹ᩍ߈ᥭᬑʑ᜽ŖⅩʑÕ᳑ᙹ⇶ᮝಽ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᯕᙹ⇶⦹໕ ᕽĞĥ໕ᨱᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ŝࠥ⦽ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮝಽᯙ⦹ᩍᇡ₊໕❭ᗱ ᯕ ၽᔾ⦽݅Ł ᅕŁ⦹ᩡ݅. ə్ӹ Texas ᵝᨱᕽ ᜽⨹᜽Ŗ ၰ

⠪a⦽đŝෝ☖⦹ᩍ⍍ย(curling)ᯕӹ᪡⦲(warping)ᨱ᮹⦽

ᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆᮝಽᇡ₊໕❭ᗱᯕၽᔾ⦽݅Łđುԕಙ݅(Medina Chavez et al., 2007). ᯕ᪡zᯕʑ᳕ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᰍഭ, Ŗჶ, ᜽ Ŗၰ⪹Ğ✚ᖒᯕᔢᯕ⧉ᮝಽᯙ⦹ᩍᇡ₊໕ᨱᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ᵝ᫵

ᇡ₊❭ƕ༉ऽᨱݡ⦽ᔢၹࡽđುᮥᱽ᜽⦹ŁᯩᮝӹᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ ಆŝ ᙹ⠪ ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮝಽ ӹ┡ԝ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ᇡ₊᮲ಆᯕ ᇡ₊vࠥ

ᯕᔢၽᔾ⦹íࡹ໕❭ᗱᯕၽᔾ⦹íࡹ۵äᮥ⪶ᯙ⧁ᙹᯩ݅.

↽ɝॅᨕ, ᯕ᜚ᬑ॒(2012)᮹ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ʑ᳕ྙ⨭ᨱᕽᱽ᜽ࡽ

݅᧲⦽✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⦹۵ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥᝅ᜽⦹ᩍ ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙

߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᇡ₊❭ƕၽᔾີ⍅ܩ᷹ၰᵝ᫵ᩢ⨆ᯙᯱෝá☁⦹ᩡ

݅. ᩑǍ đŝ, ᇡ₊ ❭ᗱᮡ ᙹḢ ᯙᰆ᮲ಆŝ ᙹ⠪ ᱥ݉᮲ಆ᮹

ᅖ⧊ᱢᯙÑ࠺ᨱ᮹⦹ᩍၽᔾ⧁ᙹᯩᮝӹᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆ᮹ᩢ⨆ᯕ

ḡ႑ᱢᯕအಽ ⣩ḩšญ ᜽ ᙹḢ ᯙᰆᨱ ᮹⦽ ᇡ₊vࠥ ʑᵡᮥ

ᔍᬊ⦹۵äᯕ⧊ญᱢᯙäᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ੱ⦽ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙

߈ᥭᬑʑᨱݡ⦽Ʊ☖ၰ⪹Ğ⦹ᵲᰍ⦹᜽߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭ᮹ᩕ➞₞

ĥᙹ᷾aᨱ঑ෙ↽ݡᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆ(ᇡ₊᮲ಆ)᮹ᄡ⪵a0.63ⴇ 2.20MPa ჵ᭥ಽᱽ᜽ࡹᨩᮝ໑, ɚ⦽᮹⧕ᕾ᳑Õᮥᱽ᫙⦹޵௝ࠥ

⩥⧪ᇡ₊vࠥʑᵡ1.4MPaᨱɝᱲ⦹۵0.60MPa ᯕᔢ᮹ᇡ₊᮲ ಆᯕ ၽᔾ⦹ᩍ ⣩ḩšญ ᜽ ݉᳑⦹ᵲ(monotonic load)ᨱ ݡ⦽

ᇡ₊vࠥ᮹á☁ᐱอᦥܩ௝ၹᅖ⦹ᵲ(cyclic load)ᨱݡ⦽ᇡ₊

⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⧕᧝⧁äᮝಽ❱݉⦹ᩡ݅(ᯕ᜚ᬑ᫙, 2012 / Lee et al., 2012). ə్ӹᯝၹᱢᮝಽᙹḢᯙᰆᨱݡ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥ

⣩ḩšญ᜽pull-out testෝᝅ᜽⦹ᩍ݉᳑⦹ᵲᨱݡ⦽อ᳒ᩍᇡෝ

❱݉⦹Łᯩᮝӹ ၹᅖ⦹ᵲᨱ ݡ⦽ᇡ₊ ⦝ಽ❭ƕ ✚ᖒá☁ ᜽

pull-out test᮹ ᱢᬊᮡ ᬊᯕ⦹ḡ ༜⦹အಽ ᱶపᱢᯙ ᇡ₊ ⦝ಽ

✚ᖒᮥ༉ᔍ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍၹᅖ⦹ᵲ᮹ᱢᬊᯕᬊᯕ⦽eᱲᯙᰆ᜽⨹

(IDT, Indirect Tensile Test)᮹ ᱢᬊᮥ ༉ᔪ⦹Łᯱ ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕෝ᭥⦹ᩍᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᇡ₊

✚ᖒᯕᇡ₊vࠥᨱၙ⊹۵ᩢ⨆ᮥá☁⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ݉᳑⦹ᵲၰၹᅖ

⦹ᵲ ᱢᬊᨱ ঑ෙ ⧊ญᱢᯕŁ ᱶపᱢᯙ ᇡ₊ ✚ᖒᮥ Łₑ⦹ʑ

᭥⦽ʑⅩᩑǍ݉ĥಽḢᱲᯙᰆ᜽⨹(pull-out test)ŝeᱲᯙᰆ᜽⨹

(IDT; Indirect Tensile Test) ᮥ☖⦹ᩍࠥ⇽ࡹ۵ᇡ₊vࠥ᮹ᔢš

šĥෝᇥᕾ⦹ᩍIDT᮹ᱢᬊᖒᮥ❱݉⦹Łᯱ⦹ᩡ݅. ᅙᩑǍ᮹

(3)

(a) BCO(Bonded Concrete Overlay)

(b) UBCO(Unbonded Concrete Overlay)

Fig. 1. Mechanistic Characteristics of Concrete Overlays (Huang, 2003)

(a) Bond Failure by Normal Tensile Stress

(b) Bond Failure by Horizontal Shear Stress Fig. 2. Bond Failure Mode of BCO

↽᳦༊ᱢᮡ ᝅᱽ ⩥ᰆÑ࠺ᮥ ༉ᔍ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ၹᅖ⦹ᵲᨱ ᮹⦽

ᇡ₊⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹۵äᯕ໑, ᇡ₊vࠥ/ᇡ₊⦝ಽ⣩ḩš ญෝ ᭥⦽ ʑⅩᯱഭಽ ⪽ᬊ⦹Łᯱ ⦽݅.

2. ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹✚ᖒ

2.1 ಺೥ࠤൈ۽੤૴׆ଭंࠑ

ᯝၹᱢᮝಽࠥಽ⡍ᰆᮡŖᬊᖒᯕqᗭ⧉ᨱ঑௝ฯᮡǍeᨱᕽ

❭ᗱᯕၽᔾ⦹ᩍᮁḡᅕᙹၰᰍÕᖅᮥ⦥᫵ಽ⦹íࡽ݅. י⬥

⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹߈ᥭᬑʑ۵ᵝಽĞ⨹ᨱ᮹⦹ᩍၽᱥࡹᨕ᪵ᮝ໑,

⩥ᰍ݅᧲⦽᳑Õ⦹ᨱᕽᩍ్⩶┽᮹߈ᥭᬑʑŖჶᯕ᜽⧪ࡹŁ

ᯩ݅. ᯕᵲᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ(BCO; Bonded Concrete Overlay) ۵⡍ᰆᰍഭᱢᯙ⊂໕᮹❭ᗱᯕᱢᮝ໑እƱᱢ⡍ᰆᔢ┽

a᧲⪙⦽Ğᬑ᜽⧪⦹ᩍ⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹Ǎ᳑ᱢ, ʑ܆ᱢ}ᖁᮥ

᭥⦽ äᮝಽ ʑ᳕ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ⡍ᰆ ᭥ᨱ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ෝ ᱲ₊᜽┅۵

Ŗჶᯕ݅. ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ۵Fig. 1(a)᪡zᯕᯝၹᱢᮝ ಽʑ᳕⡍ᰆ⊖ŝ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᮥ݉ᯝℕ(monolithic)ᨱaʾíᱲ₊

᜽┅۵äᯕ⡍ᰆℕ᮹Ǎ᳑ᱢv⪵ᨱๅᬑ⬉ŝᱢᯕ௝۵šᱱᨱᕽ

እ೐ࡽäᯕ݅. ⊖eᇡ₊ᯕᵲ᫵⦹ʑভྙᨱmilling ੱ۵blasting

॒ᮥ☖⦹ᩍʑ᳕⡍ᰆ᮹ᩕ⪵ᇡ᭥ෝᱽÑ⦽⬥Ḣᱲ᜽Ŗ⦹Ñӹ

bonding agent ෝ ᔍᬊ⦹ʑࠥ ⦽݅. ߈ᥭᬑʑ ⊖᮹ ᮲ಆᔢ┽ෝ

ᔕ⠕ᅕ໕ʑ᳕⡍ᰆŝ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᯕᯝℕÑ࠺ᮥ☖⦹ᩍᵲพ⇶ᯕ

ᦥ௹ಽԕಅaအಽ⡍ᰆ⊖⦹ᇡᨱᯙᰆ᮲ಆᯕၽᔾ⦹íࡽ݅. ߈ᥭ ᬑʑᖅĥ᜽ᩕ⪵ᇡ᭥ෝᱽ᫙⦹۵ʑ᳕⡍ᰆ᮹ᮁ⬉݉໕ᮥᔍᬊ⦹

အಽǎԕ᮹Ğᬑ᧞5cm ԕ᫙ಽ, ǎ᫙᮹Ğᬑ᧞8 ~ 16cm ჵ᭥᮹

እƱᱢ᧨ᮡࢱ̹ಽ᜽Ŗࡽ݅. ʑ᳕⡍ᰆᯕᝅḩᱢᮝಽᰍ᜽Ŗᯕ

⦥᫵⦹ÑӹD⩶Ɂᩕ॒᮹ԕǍᖒᨱྙᱽaᯩ۵Ğᬑෝᱽ᫙⦹໕

⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆᨱ ձญ ᔍᬊ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵ ᮁḡᅕᙹ ݡᦩᯕ݅.

ၹ໕ᨱ እₚ₊᜾ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ(UBCO; Unbonded Concrete Overlay)۵⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹Ǎ᳑ᱢ, ʑ܆ᱢ}ᖁ⦹ʑ

᭥⦹ᩍᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑᅕ݅ʑ᳕⡍ᰆ᮹ᩕ⪵ᔢ┽aᝍ b⦽Ŕᨱᔍᬊ⦹۵äᯕᯝၹᱢᯕ݅. UBCO۵Fig. 1(b)᪡zᯕ

ʑ᳕᮹⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᭥ᨱᇥญ⊖ᮥࢱŁə᭥ᨱᔩಽᬕ⎹Ⓧญ✙

⊖ᮥ ߈ᥭᬑ۵ Ŗჶᯕ݅. ᯕ Ŗჶᮡ ᱲ₊᜾ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ

Ŗჶŝ۵ᔢၹࡹ۵}ֱᮥwŁᯩᮝ໑, ࢱ⎹Ⓧญ✙⊖ᮥ᪥ᱥ⯩

ᇥญ᜽┕ᮝಽᕽʑ᳕⡍ᰆℕ᮹đ⧉ᯕ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᮝಽᱥݍࡹ۵

äᮥ สŁ ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᯕ ࠦพᱢᯙ ⡍ᰆℕಽ Ñ࠺⧁ ᙹ ᯩࠥಾ

⦹۵äᮥ༊ᱢᮝಽ⦹۵Ŗჶᯕ݅. ࠦพᱢᯙ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᮡ⡍ᰆ

❭ᗱᯕၽᔾ⧁a܆ᖒᯕⓍʑভྙᨱᯝၹᱢᮝಽࢱ̮í᜽Ŗ⦹Ł

ᯩᮝ໑, Ğᬑᨱ঑௝ʑ᳕⡍ᰆ⊖ࢱ̹ᯕᔢᮝಽ᜽Ŗ⦹۵Ğᬑࠥ

ᯩ݅. ࢱ⊖ᯕ᪥ᱥ⯩ᇥญࡹᨕᯩʑভྙᨱbb᮹⊖ᨱᵲพ⇶ᯕ

⩶ᖒࡹ໑ b ⊖᮹ ⦹ᇡ۵ ᯙᰆ᮲ಆᮥ ၼᦥ ߈ᥭᬑʑ ⊖ᨱᕽ᮹

❭ᗱ ၽᔾ ⪶ශᯕ ׳ᦥḥ݅.

2.2 ऀచ࡟൞֏ࡦ݁

י⬥ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ⡍ᰆᨱ ݡ⦽ ᱲ₊᜾ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ ᱢᬊ

᜽ၽᔾ⧁ᙹᯩ۵᳑ʑ❭ᗱᮥႊḡ⦹ʑ᭥⧕ᕽ۵ၹऽ᜽ᯝℕ⪵

Ñ࠺ᮥ⧕᧝⦹໑ᇡ₊໕ᯕ❭ᗱࡽĞᬑǍ᳑ᱢᮝಽ≉᧞⧕ḥ݅.

঑௝ᕽᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹Ǎ᳑ᱢ❭ᗱᵲᔢݚᇡᇥᮡ

߈ᥭᬑʑᇡ₊໕ᨱᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ᇡ₊❭ƕ௝⧁ᙹᯩ݅. ə్ӹ

(4)

Table 1. Bond Strength Criteria of BCO.

Criteria Reference

Bond strength (shear) 1.4MPa ACPA, 1990

Bond strength (tensile)

0.9MPa Canadian Standard (Stark and Polyzois, 1999)

2.1MPa Excellent

Sprinkel and Ozyildirim, 2000 1.7 ~ 2.1MPa Very good

1.4 ~ 1.7MPa Good

0.7 ~ 1.4MPa Fair

0 ~ 0.7MPa Poor

1.4MPa Korea Expressway Corporation, 2009

əᬱᯙᨱݡ⦽⧕ᕾᮡᩑǍᯱᨱ঑௝݅ᗭᔢᯕ⦹ḡอFig. 2᪡

zᯕⓍíᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆŝᙹ⠪ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮝಽǍᇥ⧁ᙹᯩ݅.

ᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆ᮹ĞᬑƱ☖⦹ᵲŝ⍍ย/᪡⦲᮹ᩢ⨆ᨱ᮹⧕ၽᔾ⧁

ᙹᯩᮝ໑, ᙹ⠪ᱥ݉᮲ಆ᮹Ğᬑ᪉ࠥᄡ⪵ᨱ঑ෙᙹ⇶/➞₞ၰ

Ʊ☖⦹ᵲ᮹ᩢ⨆ᨱ᮹⧕ၽᔾ⧁ᙹᯩ݅(Medina Chavez et al., 2007).

Peter M. Semen ॒᮹ ᩑǍᨱ ᮹⦹໕ ᱥ☖ᱢᮝಽ 1950֥ݡ

⬥ၹᇡ░ ᱥ݉ᨱ ᮹⦽ ᇡ₊໕ ❭ƕෝ Łಅ⦹ᩍ ᱥ݉vࠥᨱ ݡ

⦽ʑᵡᮥᱽ᜽⦹ᩡᮝӹ, Granju (2001) ၰLange ॒(2001) ॒ᯕ

ᝅ⨹ŝ ⧉̹ ᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥ ᄲ⧪⦽ ᩑǍ đŝᨱ ᮹⦹໕ Õ᳑ᙹ⇶

ŝ⧉̹᪉ࠥᄡ⪵ᨱ঑ෙᙹ⇶➞₞ᮝಽᯙ⦽ᜍ௹ቭ⍍ย⩥ᔢ ᯕၽᔾ⦹ᩍ݉ᇡ᪡༉ᕽญᨱᕽ᮹׳ᮡᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ

₊໕ᯙᰆ❭ƕaၽᔾ⦹۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅(Peter M. Semen et al., 2005). ੱ⦽Medina Chavez ॒᮹ᩑǍᨱ᮹⦹໕, California ᵝᨱᕽי⬥⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ(JPCP ; Jointed Plain Concrete Pave- ment) ᭥ᨱᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑෝᱢᬊ⦽᜽Ŗᔍಡෝ☖⦹

ᩍ᜽ŖⅩʑᰍഭॅ᮹Õ᳑ᙹ⇶ᮝಽᯙ⦽߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᯕᙹ⇶⦹໕ ᕽĞĥ໕ᨱᕽŝࠥ⦹íၽᔾ⦽ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮝಽᯙ⦹ᩍᇡ₊໕❭

ᗱᯕၽᔾ⦽äᮝಽđುԕญŁᯩ݅. Texas ᵝ᮹Ğᬑ, CRCP (Continuous Reinforced Concrete Pavement) ᭥ᨱSteel Fiber ၰ WWF(Welded Wire Fabric)ಽ ᅕvࡽ CRCO(Continuous Reinforced Concrete Overlay) ᜽Ŗᔍಡᨱᕽ۵ᰍഭ, ᜽Ŗᔢ᮹

⣩ḩšญ ॒᮹݅᧲⦽ ᬱᯙᮝಽ ᯙ⦹ᩍࢱ aḡ ༉ऽᨱ᮹⧕ᕽ

ᅖ⧊ᱢᮝಽၽᔾ⦽݅Ł⦹ᩡ݅. ə్ӹTexas᮹⇵aᩑǍᨱᕽ۵

Ğĥ໕ᇥญ᮹ີ⍅ܩ᷹ᮥࢱaḡಽeᵝ⦹Ł᜽⨹᜽Ŗၰ⠪a⦽

đŝ, ⍍ยᯕӹ᪡⦲ᨱ᮹⧕ၽᔾ⦽ᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆᯕᇡ₊໕❭ᗱᨱ

ḡ႑ᱢᯙ äᮝಽ đುḡᨩ݅(Medina Chavez et al., 2007).

ᯕ᪡zᯕʑ᳕ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᰍഭ, Ŗჶ, ᜽Ŗၰ⪹Ğ✚ᖒ᮹

᫵ᯙᯕᔢᯕ⧉ᮝಽᯙ⦹ᩍᇡ₊໕ᨱᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ᵝ᫵ᇡ₊❭ƕ༉

ऽᨱ ݡ⦽ ᔢၹࡽ đುᮥ ᱽ᜽⦹Ł ᯩᮝӹ, ᇡ₊໕ᨱ ᯲ᬊ⦹۵

ᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆŝᙹ⠪ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮝಽӹ┡ԝᙹᯩ۵ᇡ₊᮲ಆᯕ

ᇡ₊vࠥᯕᔢӹ┡ӹíࡹ໕ᇡ₊໕❭ᗱᯕၽᔾ⦽äᮥ⪶ᯙ⧁

ᙹᯩ݅. ↽ɝॅᨕ, ᯕ᜚ᬑ॒(2012)᮹ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ʑ᳕ྙ⨭ᨱᕽ

ᱽ᜽ࡽ݅᧲⦽✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⦹ᩍᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᇡ₊

໕ᨱᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆၰᙹ⠪ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮥᙹ⊹⧕ᕾᮥ

☖⦹ᩍá☁⦹ᩡ݅. ᩑǍđŝ, ᇡ₊᮲ಆ᮹ĞᬑƱ☖⦹ᵲŝ⪹Ğ⦹

ᵲ᮹ᔢ⪙᯲ᬊᨱ᮹⦹ᩍၽᔾ⦹ӹᙹḢ ᯙᰆ᮲ಆᮡ⪹Ğ⦹ᵲ᮹

ᩢ⨆ᮥ ၼᮝ໑, ᙹ⠪ ᱥ݉᮲ಆᮡ Ʊ☖⦹ᵲ᮹ ᩢ⨆ᯕ ⓑ äᮝಽ

ӹ┡ԍ݅. ੱ⦽ᇡ₊໕❭ᗱ᮹ĞᬑᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆŝᙹ⠪ᱥ݉᮲ಆ ᮹ᅖ⧊ᱢᯙÑ࠺ᨱ᮹⦹ᩍၽᔾ⧁ᙹᯩᮝӹᙹ⠪ᱥ݉᮲ಆᅕ݅۵

ᙹḢ ᯙᰆ᮲ಆ᮹ ᩢ⨆ᯕ ḡ႑ᱢᯙ äᮝಽ ӹ┡ԍ݅(ᯕ᜚ᬑ ᫙, 2012 / Lee et al., 2012).

2.3 ऀచԳܑ౸୨ࢺੲճఝ

ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ۵Ŗᬊᙹ໦࠺ᦩᅙ௹᮹ʑ܆ᮥᙹ⧪

⧁ᙹᯩࠥಾʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙᪡ᯝℕaࡹᨕ᫙ᇡ᮹ྜྷญᱢੱ۵

⪹Ğᱢ⦹ᵲᨱčॽᙹᯩᨕ᧝⦽݅. ঑௝ᕽ⣩ḩšญ᜽߈ᥭᬑʑ

⊖᮹ ᇡ₊ಆ ⪶ᅕa ᵲ᫵⦽ ᫵ᯙᯕ௝ ⧁ ᙹ ᯩᮝӹ ᯕᨱ ݡ⦽

⊂ᱶႊჶၰʑᵡ᮹ĞᬑTable 1ŝzᯕbʑšᨱ঑௝₉ᯕෝ

ᅕᯕŁᯩ݅(K. D. Smith et al., 2002 / ⦽ǎࠥಽŖᔍ, 2009).

ᯕ᪡zᯕbb᮹ᩑǍᯱၰʑšᨱᕽᔢᯕ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥ⣩ḩšญ ʑᵡᮥᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵ᯕᮁ۵ᦿᕽʑᚁ⦽ၵ᪡zᯕᇡ₊໕ᨱᕽ

ၽᔾ⦹۵ᵝ᫵ᇡ₊❭ƕ༉ऽᨱݡ⦽ᔢၹࡽᩑǍđŝᨱᕽእ೐ࡹ

۵äᯕ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᦿᖁᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹݅᧲⦽

⧕ᕾ᳑Õᄥᇡ₊᮲ಆၽᔾ✚ᖒᮥ⪶ᯙ⦽đŝᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆᨱ

᮹⦽ ᵝ᫵ ᇡ₊❭ƕ༉ऽෝ ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡ݅(ᯕ᜚ᬑ ᫙, 2012 / Lee et al., 2012). ঑௝ᕽ ⣩ḩšญෝ ᭥⦽ ᇡ₊vࠥ ⊂ᱶ ᜽ ᙹḢ

ᯙᰆvࠥʑᵡᮥᔍᬊ⦹۵äᯕ⧊ญᱢᯕ໑, ǎԕᨱᕽ᜽⧪⦹Ł

ᯩ۵Pull-out test(KS F 2762)᮹ĞᬑᙹḢᯙᰆᨱݡ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥ

ෝᱽ᜽⦹۵äᮝಽᱢᬊ┡ݚᖒᯕᯩ۵äᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅. ੱ⦽

ᯕ᜚ᬑ॒(2012)᮹ᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑᨱݡ⦽

Ʊ☖ၰ ⪹Ğ⦹ᵲ ᰍ⦹᜽ ߈ᥭᬑʑ ᰍഭ᮹ᩕ➞₞ĥᙹ ᷾aᨱ

(5)

(a) Diagrammatic arrangement of the test

(b) Stress distribution across the loaded diameter Fig. 4. Indirect tensile test (splitting tensile test based on ASTM C

496)

(a) Bond test (b) Failure in adhesion layer (c) Failure in overlay (d) Failure in bond layer (e) Failure in subtracte Fig. 3. Bond failure characteristics due to pull-out test (M. A. Issa et al., 2008)

঑ෙ↽ݡᙹḢᯙᰆ᮲ಆ(ᇡ₊᮲ಆ)᮹ᄡ⪵a0.63ⴇ2.20MPaಽ

ӹ┡ԍᮝ໑, ɚ⦽᮹⧕ᕾ᳑Õᮥᱽ᫙⦹޵௝ࠥ⩥⧪ᇡ₊vࠥʑᵡ

1.4MPaᨱɝᱲ⦹۵0.60MPa ᯕᔢ᮹ᇡ₊᮲ಆᯕၽᔾ⦹အಽ⣩ḩ šญ᜽݉᳑⦹ᵲ(monotonic load)ᨱݡ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥ᮹á☁ᐱอ

ᦥܩ௝ၹᅖ⦹ᵲ(cyclic load)ᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥŁಅ⧕

᧝ ⧁ äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅. ə్ӹ ʑ᳕ Pull-out test᮹ Ğᬑ Fig.

3ŝzᮡ݅᧲⦽ᝅ⨹ᱢ᪅₉ಽᯙ⦹ᩍᇡ₊໕ᨱᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ᱶపᱢ ᯙ ᇡ₊vࠥෝ ⊂ᱶ⦹۵ äᯕ ⩥ᝅᱢᮝಽ ᨕಅᬑ໑ ݉᳑⦹ᵲ (monotonic load)ᨱݡ⦽อ᳒ᩍᇡෝ❱݉⦹۵äᮝಽ, ᝅᱽ⩥ᰆ

᳑Õᮥ༉ᔍ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ၹᅖ⦹ᵲ(cyclic load)᮹ᱢᬊᯕᬊᯕ⦹ḡ

༜⦹ᩍᇡ₊⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥŁₑ⦹ʑ᭥⦽⇵aᱢᯙᝅ⨹ႊჶ᮹

á☁a ⦥᫵⦹݅.

঑௝ᕽ ݉᳑⦹ᵲᨱ ᮹⦽ ᇡ₊vࠥ ⊂ᱶŝ ⧉̹ ᱶపᱢᯙ ᇡ

₊⦝ಽ✚ᖒᮥ༉ᔍ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍၹᅖ⦹ᵲ᮹ᱢᬊᯕᬊᯕ⦽eᱲ ᯙᰆ᜽⨹(IDT, Indirect Tensile Test) ᵲ⦹ӹᯙἝᯙᰆ᜽⨹

(splitting tensile test) ᮥₙ᳑⦹ᩍᙹ⧪⦹Łᯱ⦹ᩡ݅(ASTM C 496). IDT᮹ĞᬑFig. 4᪡zᯕḢĞ᮹᧲݉ᇡᇥᮥᱽ᫙⦹Ł

ᯝᱶ⦽ᯙᰆ᮲ಆᮥၽᔾ᜽┍ᙹᯩᮝအಽᵲพ⇶ᮥʑᵡᮝಽʑ᳕

⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆŝ߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭෝ༉ᔍ⦹ᩍᝅ⨹⧁Ğᬑᇡ₊໕ᨱ ᕽၽᔾ⦹۵ᱶపᱢᯙᇡ₊vࠥ⊂ᱶᯕa܆⧁ᐱอᦥܩ௝ᇡ₊v

ࠥᨱݡ⦽ᇡ₊⦝ಽ✚ᖒá☁᜽ᝅ⨹᮹ᱢᬊᯕᬊᯕ⧁äᮝಽ

❱݉⦹ᩡ݅. ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ၹᅖ⦹ᵲ

ᱢᬊᨱ঑ෙᇡ₊⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹ʑ᭥⦽ᔍᱥ݉ĥಽ៉,

݉᳑⦹ᵲᰍ⦹᜽ʑ᳕pull-out test᪡IDTෝ☖⦹ᩍࠥ⇽ࡹ۵

ᇡ₊vࠥෝእƱᇥᕾ⦽⬥ᔢššĥෝá☁⦹ᩍIDT᮹ᱢᬊᖒᮥ

❱݉⦹Łᯱ ⦹ᩡ݅.

3. Ḣᱲᯙᰆၰeᱲᯙᰆᨱ঑ෙᇡ₊vࠥ⠪aႊᦩ

3.1 ਓ෠୺Ս

ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᰍഭᱢ✚ᖒ, ⦹ᇡ⊖vࠥ, ⦹ᇡ⊖

ᩕ⪵ᱶࠥᨱ঑ෙᇡ₊✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍTable 2᪡zᮡ

݅᧲⦽ᇡ₊ᝅ⨹᳑Õᮥᖅᱶ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, bb᮹ᝅ⨹᳑Õᨱݡ⦹ᩍ

Ḣᱲᯙᰆ(direct tensile test) ၰ eᱲᯙᰆ(indirect tensile test)

ᝅ⨹ႊჶᮥ ᱢᬊ⦹ᩍ ᇡ₊vࠥෝ ⊂ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ߈ᥭᬑʑ ᰍഭ᮹

Ğᬑᅕ☖⡍✡௽ऽ᜽ູ✙(OPC; Ordinary Portland Cement)ෝ

ᔍᬊ⦹۵⡍ᰆᬊ⎹Ⓧญ✙, ⅩᗮĞ᜽ູ✙(URHC; Ultra Rapid Harding Cement)ෝᔍᬊ⦹۵⎹Ⓧญ✙᪡⧉̹⩥ᰍ⩥ᰆᨱᱢᬊ

ᵲᯙⅩᗮĞ௝▮ᜅၰᦥⓍตĥ⡕ญນ}ḩ⎹Ⓧญ✙ෝᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ

݅. ᯝၹᱢᮝಽ8ⴇ10᜽e࠺ᦩ᮹᧝e᜽Ŗᯕᯕ൉ᨕḡ۵ᱲ₊᜾

⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ĞᬑƱ☖}ႊ᜽eᮥʑᵡᮝಽᰍಚ3ⴇ4᜽

e ԕ᫙᮹ ᇡ₊vࠥ ⣩ḩšญ ʑᵡᮥ อ᳒⧕᧝ ⦹အಽ OPC᮹

ĞᬑⅩᗮĞᮥ᫵Ǎ⦹۵߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭಽᔍᬊᮡᇩa܆⦹ӹᯕᨱ

ݡ⦽ ᇡ₊ ✚ᖒᮥ ᇥᕾ⦹Łᯱ ᝅ⨹᳑Õᨱ ⇵a⦹ᩡ݅.

ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖ᮥ༉ᔍ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍᔍᬊࡽOPC᮹Ğᬑ

(6)

Table 2. Bond strength test due to various conditions.

Type of Existing PCC

Deterioration Status of

existing PCC Overlay Material

OPC

1)

(25 30 MPa) -

URHC

2)

URH-LMC

3)

URH-APMC

4)

OPC (30 35 MPa)

-

OPC (3035 MPa) OPC (3540 MPa)

URHC URH-LMC URH-APMC Surface Scaling

Resistance Test (after 25 cycles)

URHC URH-LMC URH-APMC

OPC

(3540 MPa) -

URHC URH-LMC URH-APMC 1) OPC : Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete

2) URHC : Ultra Rapid Harding Cement Concrete

3) URH-LMC : Ultra Rapid Harding Latex-Modified Concrete 4) URH-APMC : Ultra Rapid Harding Acrylic Polymer-Modified

Concrete

Table 3. Mixture proportion of concrete Gmax (mm)

Slump (cm)

Air (%)

W/B (%)

S/a (%)

Content (kg/m

3

)

Water Binder Fine Agg. Coarse Agg. Etc.

OPC

(30 35MPa) 13, 25 4 6 45 42 148.5 330 759 1,067 AE Water Reducing Agent

(B×0.3%)

Overlay URHC 13 8 3~6 40 35 160 400 631 1,172 Reducing Agent (B×0.3%)

Retarder (B×0.3%)

Overlay URH-LMC 13 16~22 3~6 38 55 74 360 960 787 Latex 115

Overlay URH-APMC 13 15~17 6 36 44 106 390 756 979 Acrylic Polymer 66

AE (B×0.03%) ǖᮡʼnᰍ↽ݡ⊹ᙹ25mmᨱݡ⦹ᩍ, 30ⴇ35MPa ჵ᭥᮹⢽ᵡ႑⧊

ᮡ ࠥಽŖᔍ ᱥྙ᜽ႊᕽෝ ₙ᳑ ⬥ ᔍᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, 25ⴇ30MPa ၰ 35ⴇ40MPa ჵ᭥᮹ OPC۵ ݉᭥᜽ູ✙ప᮹ ᷾qᮥ ☖⦹ᩍ

ᜍౝ⥥᪡Ŗʑప᮹ʑᵡᮥอ᳒᜽┉⬥ᱢᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᔢᇡ⊖߈ᥭᬑ ʑᰍഭಽᔍᬊࡽ⎹Ⓧญ✙᮹Ğᬑǖᮡʼnᰍ↽ݡ⊹ᙹ13mmෝ

ᔍᬊ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, OPC᮹Ğᬑ⦹ᇡ⊖ŝ࠺ᯝ⦽႑⧊እෝᱢᬊ⬥

bbᜍౝ⥥᪡Ŗʑపᮡ⪝⪵ᱽᔍᬊᮥ☖⦹ᩍ᜽ႊʑᵡჵ᭥ᨱ

ॅí⦹ᩡ݅. ੱ⦽Overlay URH-LMC ၰOverlay URH-APMC

⎹Ⓧญ✙᮹ Ğᬑᱽ᜽ࡽ⢽ᵡ႑⧊ᮥᔍᬊ⦹ᩡ݅. ᝅ⨹ᨱᔍᬊࡽ

⎹Ⓧญ✙ ᰍഭᨱ ݡ⦽ ⢽ᵡ ႑⧊ᮡ Table 3ŝ z݅.

3.2 ਏඇ୪ୁ

Fig. 5۵ ᇡ₊ᝅ⨹ᮥ ᭥⦽ ᜽⠙ ᱽ᯲ ŝᱶᮥ ӹ┡ԙ äᮝಽ

bb᮹⎹Ⓧญ✙ᰍഭᨱݡ⦹ᩍᦶ⇶vࠥၰ⮉vࠥ᜽⠙ᮥᱽ᯲⦹

ᩍ ᰍഭᱢ ✚ᖒᮥ ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡ݅. ⦹ᇡ⊖ ᜽⠙ᮥ 28ᯝ ݡʑ᧲ᔾ⦽

⬥ᔢᇡ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᮥᱽ᯲⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕভᯝᇡ᜽⠙᮹Ğᬑ⦹ᇡ⊖

ᩕ⪵᳑Õᮥ༉ᔍ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍ⢽໕ၶญᱡ⧎ᖒᝅ⨹ᮥḥ⧪⦹ᩡᮝ ໑, ASTM C 672ෝₙ᳑⦹ᩍ3%᮹ᩝ⪵⋝᛹ᙹᬊᧂᮥ⋉⚍᜽⎑

݅. ⢽໕ၶญᱡ⧎ᖒᮥ⠪a⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍ17᜽e࠺ᦩ(-)18ⳃᨱᕽ

࠺đ⦹ᩡᮝ໑, 7᜽eᮡ ᔢ᪉ᨱᕽ ᮖ⧕ŝᱶᮥ Ñ⊹۵ 1ᔍᯕⓕᮥ

ⅾ25⫭ၹᅖᙹ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. ᝅ⨹᪅₉ෝᵥᯕŁ⩥ᰆ᜽Ŗ᳑Õᮥ

ᯝᇡ༉ᔍ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍ⦹ᇡ⊖⢽໕᮹༉෕┡෕⊖ᮡsteel brushing

ᮥ☖⦹ᩍᱽÑ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕ⬥ᔢᇡ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖ᮥ⡍ᖅ⦽⬥28ᯝ

ݡʑ᧲ᔾᮥ ᝅ᜽⦹ᩡ݅.

3.3 ಺೥ࠤൈ׆ొࢄনࢫऀచԳܑ౸୨ր୨

ᇡ₊vࠥ✚ᖒᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍᔍᬊࡽ⎹Ⓧญ✙۵28ᯝ⧎᪉

⧎᜖᧲ᔾ⬥ᦶ⇶ၰv॒ࠥ᮹ʑⅩྜྷᖒᮥ⊂ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. ᇡ₊vࠥ

⊂ᱶᮡFig. 6ŝzᯕʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⊖ᮥ28ᯝ᧲ᔾ⬥ᔢᇡ߈ᥭᬑ ʑෝᝅ᜽⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ߈ᥭᬑʑ⎹Ⓧญ✙᮹ᰍಚ28ᯝ⬥⎵ᨕยᮥ

ᝅ᜽⦹ᩍᇡ₊vࠥෝ⊂ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. Pull-out test᮹ĞᬑKS F 2762

ෝₙ᳑⦹ᩍᙹ⧪⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ⦹ᇡ⊖15cm᭥ᨱᔢᇡ⊖5cm ߈ᥭᬑ ʑෝᝅ᜽⦽⬥ḢĞ10cm᮹⎵ᨕእ✙ෝᔍᬊ⦹ᩍʫᯕ7cm᮹

⎵ᨕย⬥ᇡ₊vࠥෝ⊂ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅. IDT۵⦹ᇡ⊖15cm᭥ᨱᔢᇡ⊖

15cm ߈ᥭᬑʑෝᝅ᜽⦽⬥ᇡ₊໕ŝᯝ⊹⦹۵᭥⊹ᯙ᜽⠙᮹

⊂໕ᮥᱶ⪶⦹í⎵ᨕย⦹ᩍᇡ₊vࠥ᜽⠙ᮥᱽ᯲⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ᜽⠙

ʙᯕ20cmಽ⍘❦⦽⬥Ἕᯙᰆvࠥ⊂ᱶႊჶŝ࠺ᯝ⦹íᇡ₊v

ࠥෝ ⊂ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅.

4. ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᇡ₊vࠥ✚ᖒ⠪a

4.1 ୦చਐ಺೥ࠤൈ۽੤૴׆୍߹ଭ׆ొࢄনՑഠ

Table 4۵ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᇡ₊✚ᖒ⠪a᜽ᔍᬊࡽ

(7)

(a) Existing PCC for pull-out test (500*250*150mm)

(b) Existing PCC for IDT (500*300*150mm) (c) Scaling test (3 cases)

(d) Surface deterioration after 25cycles of scaling test

(e) Removing mortar of existing PCC (f) Overlay on existing PCC Fig. 5. Specimen preparation and curing of existing concrete pavement

(a) Coring for Pull-out test (b) Coring for IDT (c) Bond strength measurement by pull-out test

(d) Bond strength measurement by IDT (e) Failure shape of bond interface due to pull-out test

(f) Failure shape of bond interface due to IDT

Fig. 6. Bond strength measurement

⎹Ⓧญ✙ᨱ ݡ⦹ᩍ bb 3}᮹ ᜽⠙ᮥ ᱽ᯲⦽ ⬥ ᦶ⇶vࠥ ၰ

⮉vࠥෝ⊂ᱶ⦽đŝᯕ݅. OPC᮹Ğᬑʑ᳕⡍ᰆ⊖ŝ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖

᮹႑⧊እෝ࠺ᯝ⦹íᔍᬊ⦹ᩡᮝӹǖᮡʼnᰍ↽ݡ⊹ᙹၰ႑⧊

᜽᪉/᜖॒ࠥ᮹ᩢ⨆ᮝಽၙᗭ⦽₉ᯕෝӹ┡ԕᨩ݅. ߈ᥭᬑʑ⊖᮹

(8)

Table 4. Material properties of concrete

Layer Overlay Material Material Property (MPa)

Compressive Strength Flexural Strength

Existing PCC

OPC (25 ~ 30MPa) 25.0 4.8

OPC (30 ~ 35MPa) 30.5 5.1

OPC (35 ~ 40MPa) 35.6 5.3

Overlay

URHC 44.0 9.1

URH-LMC 33.5 12.5

URH-APMC 40.2 10.6

OPC (30 ~ 35MPa) 30.0 6.5

OPC (35 ~ 40MPa) 33.2 6.6

Table 5. Results of bond strength by Pull-out test and IDT

Type of Existing PCC Type of Overlay Material Bond Strength (MPa)

by Pull-out test by IDT OPC

(Compressive Strength of 25.0 MPa)

URHC 0.7 1.5

URH-LMC 1.4 1.6

URH-APMC 1.8 2.3

OPC

(Compressive Strength of 30.5 MPa)

OPC (Compressive Strength of 30.0 MPa) 2.3 3.0

OPC (Compressive Strength of 33.2 MPa) 2.2 3.5

URHC 1.2 1.7

URH-LMC 1.5 1.6

URH-APMC 1.9 2.4

OPC

(Compressive Strength of 35.6 MPa)

URHC N/A 1.8

URH-LMC 2.2 2.2

URH-APMC 2.1 2.6

Ğᬑၵᯙ޵᮹⧉పᯕᯝၹᱢᯙ⎹Ⓧญ✙ᰍഭ᪡እƱ⦹ᩍ׳ʑ

ভྙᨱእƱᱢ׳ᮡᦶ⇶vࠥ✚ᖒᮥӹ┡ԕᨩᮝ໑, ✚⯩௝▮ᜅ

ၰ ᦥⓍตĥ ⡕ญນෝ ᔍᬊ⦹۵ }ḩ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ URH-LMC᪡

URH-APMC᮹ĞᬑOPC᪡እƱ⦹ᩍๅᬑ׳ᮡ⮉vࠥ✚ᖒᮥ

⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡ݅.

4.2 Pull-out ࢫIDT઩ଭ෉ऀచԳܑ൉নՑഠ ᱲ₊᜾ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ ᇡ₊✚ᖒᮥ ⠪a⦹ʑ ᭥⦹ᩍ

Pull-out test ၰ IDTᨱ ᮹⦽ ᙹḢ ᯙᰆ ᇡ₊vࠥ ᝅ⨹ đŝෝ

Table 5ᨱӹ┡ԕᨩ݅. ᇡ₊vࠥ۵b3}᮹đŝᨱݡ⦽⠪Ɂᮥ

᮹ၙ⦽݅. Pull-out testᨱ ᮹⦽ Ḣᱲᯙᰆ ᇡ₊vࠥ ⊂ᱶ đŝ

URHC(ⅩᗮĞ᜽ູ✙) ⎹Ⓧญ✙ෝᱽ᫙⦹Ł۵⩥⧪ࠥಽŖᔍᇡ

₊vࠥ ʑᵡᯙ 1.4MPaෝ ᔢ⫭⦹Ł ᯩ݅. URHC᮹ Ğᬑ ႑⧊

᜽ᱢᱶ᮲đḡᩑᱽෝ℉a⦹ᩍⅩʑ᯲ᨦᖒᮥ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡᮝӹ༑ऽ ᨱ ┡ᖅ ၰ ݅ḱ ᜽ ᳑ʑ Ğ⪵⦹ᩍ ʑ᳕ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ⡍ᰆ⊖ŝ᮹

ᯝℕ⪵ Ñ࠺ᮥ᭥⦽ ∊ᇥ⦽ ᇡ₊ᖒ܆ᮥ ၽ⩥⦹ḡ ༜⦽äᮝಽ

❱݉ࡽ݅. ⅩᗮĞᖒᮥ ၽ⭹⦹۵ ߈ᥭᬑʑ ᰍഭ᮹ Ğᬑ URHC, URH-LMC ၰURH-APMCಽǍᇥ⧁ᙹᯩᮝ໑, ᯕᵲURHCෝ

ᱽ᫙⦽ӹນḡᰍഭ᮹Ğᬑ௝▮ᜅၰᦥⓍตĥ⡕ญນෝ℉a⦽

}ḩ⎹Ⓧญ✙ಽ៉⣩ḩšญʑᵡᯕᔢ᮹ᇡ₊vࠥෝ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡ݅.

⇵aᱢᮝಽ ʑ᳕ ⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖(OPC) ᭥ᨱ ߈ᥭᬑʑ⦽ OPC ᰍഭ᮹Ğᬑ᪥ᱥᇡ₊ᮥ☖⦽ᬑᙹ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥෝ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡ݅. IDT ᝅ⨹ᮥ☖⦽ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⊖᮹ᦶ⇶ၰ⮉vࠥ᷾aᨱ঑ෙᇡ₊v

ࠥ✚ᖒᮡᦿᕽᱽ᜽ࡽPull-out test᪡ᮁᔍ⦽Ğ⨆ᮥӹ┡ԕᨩᮝ໑, ᇡ₊vࠥđŝ۵ࠥಽŖᔍᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦽ᇡ₊vࠥ⣩ḩšญʑᵡᮥ

༉ࢱ อ᳒⦹ᩡ݅.

Fig. 7 ၰFig. 8ᮡʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⊖᮹ᦶ⇶ၰ⮉vࠥ᷾aᨱ

঑ෙ ᇡ₊vࠥ ✚ᖒᮥ ӹ┡ԙ äᯕ݅. URHC᮹ Ğᬑ pull-out test ᜽ࠥಽŖᔍᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦽ᇡ₊vࠥ⣩ḩšญʑᵡᮥอ᳒⦹ḡ

༜⦹ᩡᮝ໑, ⅩᗮĞᖒ ߈ᥭᬑʑ ᰍഭ ᵲ ᇡ₊vࠥ ✚ᖒᮡ ᳬḡ

ᦫᮡäᮝಽ❱݉ࡽ݅. ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖᮹ᦶ⇶ၰ⮉vࠥa

᷾a⧁ᙹಾ ᇡ₊vࠥa ᷾a⦹۵ äᮥ ⪶ᯙ⧁ ᙹ ᯩᮝ໑, ᯕ۵

(9)

Fig. 7. Bond strength with strength changes of existing PCC (pull-out test)

Fig. 8. Bond strength with strength changes of existing PCC (IDT)

Fig. 9. Bond strength changes due to deterioration of existing PCC layer

ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖ᯕᱢᱶvࠥᯕᔢᮥᮁḡ⦹۵Ŗᬊʑeᵲ

ࢱ⊖ᮥ݉ᯝℕᨱaʾíᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑʑෝ᜽⧪⧁

ĞᬑǍ᳑ᱢᖒ܆⪶ᅕšᱱᨱᕽๅᬑ⬉ŝᱢᯥᮥ᮹ၙ⦽݅. ੱ⦽,

ⅩᗮĞᖒၵᯙ޵ෝᔍᬊ⦹۵ ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭ᮹

Ğᬑ௝▮ᜅၰᦥⓍตĥ⡕ญນෝ℉a⦽}ḩ⎹Ⓧญ✙᮹ᇡ₊

✚ᖒᯕ ᬑᙹ⦽ äᮥ ⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡ݅. ᝅ⨹ᨱ ᔍᬊࡽ ʑ᳕ ⎹Ⓧญ✙

⡍ᰆ⊖᭥ᨱOPCෝ߈ᥭᬑʑ⦽Ğᬑ᳑ʑƱ☖}ႊᮥ᫵Ǎ⦹۵

ǎԕ᮹ ᱲ₊᜾ ⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ Õᖅ ᜽ ᱢᬊᮡ ᇩa܆⦹ӹ

ᇡ₊✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦽đŝⅩᗮĞᖒၵᯙ޵ෝᔍᬊ⦹۵߈ᥭᬑʑ

⎹Ⓧญ✙ᨱእ⦹ᩍๅᬑ׳ᮡᇡ₊vࠥෝ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡ݅. ə్ӹ8ⴇ 10 ᜽eԕ᫙᮹᧝e᯲ᨦŝ⧉̹᜽Ŗ3ⴇ4᜽e⬥᳑ʑƱ☖}ႊᮥ

ᝅ᜽⧕᧝ ⦹۵ǎԕ᮹ ߈ᥭᬑʑ ᜽ŖᩍÕ ᔢ ᱢᬊᮡᇩa܆⧁

äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

⇵aᱢᮝಽ߈ᥭᬑʑ⎹Ⓧญ✙᮹ᦶ⇶vࠥ᷾aᨱ঑ෙᇡ₊v

ࠥ᮹ᩢ⨆ᮡᨧ۵äᮝಽӹ┡ԍ݅. ࠺ᯝ᳑Õᮝಽᝅ⨹ᯕḥ⧪

ࡽ ߈ᥭᬑʑ OPC᮹ Ğᬑ ⅩᗮĞᖒ ᰍഭෝ ᔍᬊ⦹۵ ߈ᥭᬑʑ

ᰍഭᨱእ⦹ᩍᔢݡᱢᮝಽ׳ᮡᇡ₊vࠥ ✚ᖒᮥӹ┡ԕᨩᮝӹ

ᦶ⇶vࠥ᮹ᄡ⪵aᇡ₊vࠥᨱၙ⊹۵ᩢ⨆ᯕၙၙ⦽äᮝಽ❱݉

ࡽ݅.

4.3 ׆୼಺೥ࠤൈඑୋଭવฃ઩ݗࠛऀచԳܑ൉ন ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᜽ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹ᩕ⪵ᨱ঑ෙ

ᇡ₊vࠥ✚ᖒᮥ⪶ᯙ⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍᦶ⇶vࠥ30.5MPa᮹OPCᨱ

ݡ⦽ ⢽໕ၶญᱡ⧎ᖒ ᝅ⨹ᮥ ᝅ᜽⦽ ⬥ URH-LMC ၰ URH- APMC ⎹Ⓧญ✙ෝ߈ᥭᬑʑ⦹ᩍᯕᨱݡ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥෝ⊂ᱶ⦹ᩡ݅.

ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖᮹ᩕ⪵ᮁྕᨱ঑ෙᇡ₊vࠥ⊂ᱶđŝ

Pull-out test ၰ IDT ༉ࢱ ᩕ⪵ ⬥ ᇡ₊vࠥa Ⓧí qᗭ⧉ᮥ

᦭ᙹᯩ݅. ᯕෝ☖⦹ᩍᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑÕᖅ᜽⦹ᇡ⊖᮹

ᩕ⪵ᨱ᮹⦽vࠥᱡ⦹aၽᔾ⦹ᩡᮥĞᬑᇡ₊vࠥaⓍíqᗭ⧉

ᮥ᦭ᙹᯩᮝ໑ԕǍᖒᱡ⦹ಽᯙ⦹ᩍ᳑ʑᇡ₊໕❭ᗱᯕၽᔾ⧁

ᙹᯩ݅Ł❱݉ࡽ݅. ə్ӹ⩥ᰍĞ⨹ᱢႊჶᨱ᮹⦽ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ

✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᜽Ŗ᜽ʑ᳕⡍ᰆ⊖᮹ᩕ⪵✚ᖒ❭ᦦᯕᬊᯕ⦹ḡ

ᦫᮝအಽᯕᨱݡ⦽ᝁ഑ᖒᯩ۵⠪aႊᦩᮥษಉ⦹ᩍ᳑ʑᇡ₊໕

❭ᗱᮥ ၙᩑᨱ ႊḡ⧕᧝ ⦽݅.

4.4 Pull-out ࢫIDT઩ଭ෉ऀచԳܑঃււծ ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑᨱݡ⦽ᇡ₊✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦹Łᇡ₊v

ࠥෝᱶపᱢᮝಽ⊂ᱶ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ႊᦩᨱݡ⦹ᩍá☁⦹ŁᯱᙹḢᯙ ᰆᨱ ᮹⦽ ᇡ₊vࠥෝ ⊂ᱶ⧁ ᙹ ᯩ۵ Pull-out test ၰ IDTෝ

ḥ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. ⩥ᰍࠥಽŖᔍᨱᕽᱽ᜽⦹Łᯩ۵ᇡ₊vࠥʑᵡ᮹

Ğᬑ݉᳑⦹ᵲ(monotonic load)ᨱݡ⦽อ᳒ᩍᇡෝ❱݉⦹۵äᮝ ಽ, ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ʑ᳕⡍ᰆ᮹ᩕ⪵ᮁྕෝ⡍⧉⦹۵݅᧲⦽ᇡ₊✚

ᖒᨱ঑ෙᝅᱽ⩥ᰆÑ࠺ᮥ༉ᔍ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ၹᅖ⦹ᵲ(cyclic load)ᨱ

(10)

Fig. 10. Correlation between Pull-out Test and IDT

᮹⦽ᇡ₊⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹۵ʑⅩᩑǍෝḥ⧪⦹ᩡ݅. Fig.

10 ᮡᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᇡ₊vࠥ/ᇡ₊⦝ಽ✚ᖒá☁ෝ

᭥⦽Pull-out test᪡IDT᮹ᔢššĥෝӹ┡ԙäᯕ݅. ᱥℕߑᯕ░

ᨱݡ⦽ᝁ഑ᖒᯩ۵ᇥᕾᮥḥ⧪⦹ʑ᭥⦹ᩍ5%ԕ᫙᮹ᯕᔢ⊹

(outlier)ᱽÑaa܆⦽1}᮹ߑᯕ░ၰURHC᮹⎵ᨕย᜽ᇡ₊໕ ᯕ ❭ᗱࡽ 1}᮹ ߑᯕ░۵ ᱽÑ⦹ᩡ݅. ᇥᕾ đŝ IDTᨱ ᮹⦽

ᇡ₊vࠥaPull-out testᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊vࠥᅕ݅ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ׳í

ᇥ⡍⦹Ł ᯩᮝӹ ๅᬑ ׳ᮡ ᔢššĥෝ ӹ┡ԕŁ ᯩᮝ໑ ᯕᨱ

ݡ⦽ ᔢššĥ ᜾ᮡ ݅ᮭŝ zᯕ ⢽⩥⧁ ᙹ ᯩ݅.

›ƍƌƂ¬ƒƐƃƌƅƒƆ ƀƗ ¢­ á ×íÓÑ â×íÕÓÓÏ

Z ›ƍƌƂ¬ƒƐƃƌƅƒƆ ƀƗ ©ƓƊƊ à ƍƓƒ­ƃƑƒ (Eq. 1) ᩍʑᕽ, R

2

=0.75, ၰ P-value=0.002

5. đು

ᅙᩑǍᨱᕽ۵ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆᨱᱢᬊࡹ۵ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙

߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ᇡ₊✚ᖒᯕᇡ₊vࠥᨱၙ⊹۵ᩢ⨆ᮥá☁⦹ᩡᮝ໑,

݉᳑⦹ᵲၰၹᅖ⦹ᵲᨱ঑ෙ⧊ญᱢᯕŁᱶపᱢᯙᇡ₊vࠥ⊂ᱶ

ႊჶᮥࠥ⇽⦹ʑ᭥⦽ʑⅩᩑǍ݉ĥಽḢᱲᯙᰆ᜽⨹(pull-out test) ŝeᱲᯙᰆ᜽⨹(IDT; Indirect Tensile Test)ᮥእƱᇥᕾ⦹ᩡ݅.

ᯕᨱ ݡ⦽ ᵝ᫵ đುᮡ ݅ᮭŝ z݅.

(1) Pull-out testᨱ᮹⦽Ḣᱲᯙᰆᇡ₊vࠥၰIDTᨱ᮹⦽eᱲᯙ ᰆᇡ₊vࠥ⊂ᱶđŝ, URHC(ⅩᗮĞ᜽ູ✙) ⎹Ⓧญ✙ෝ

ᱽ᫙⦹Ł⩥⧪ࠥಽŖᔍᇡ₊vࠥʑᵡᯙ1.4 MPaෝอ᳒⦹ᩡ

݅. ੱ⦽ⅩᗮĞᖒᮥḡܭ߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭᵲ௝▮ᜅၰᦥⓍตĥ

⡕ญນෝ℉a⦽}ḩ⎹Ⓧญ✙᮹ĞᬑURHC᪡እƱ⦹ᩍ

ᬑᙹ⦽ᇡ₊vࠥෝ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡ݅. ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖᮹ᦶ⇶

ၰ⮉vࠥa᷾a⧁ᙹಾᇡ₊vࠥa᷾a⦹۵Ğ⨆ᮥӹ┡ԩᮝ ӹ߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭ᮹ᦶ⇶ၰ⮉vࠥ᷾aaᇡ₊vࠥᨱၙ⊹۵

ᩢ⨆ᮡ ၙၙ⦹ᩡ݅.

(2) ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ⊖᭥ᨱOPCෝ߈ᥭᬑʑ⧁ĞᬑⅩᗮĞᖒ

ၵᯙ޵ෝᔍᬊ⦹۵߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭᨱእ⦹ᩍ׳ᮡᇡ₊vࠥෝ

⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡᮝӹ ᳑ʑ Ʊ☖}ႊᮥ ⦥᫵ಽ ⦹۵ ǎԕ᮹ ᱲ₊᜾

⎹Ⓧญ✙ ߈ᥭᬑʑ ᱢᬊᮡ ᬊᯕ⦹ḡ ༜⧁äᮝಽ ❱݉ࡽ݅.

(3) ʑ᳕ ⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹ ᩕ⪵ ⬥ ߈ᥭᬑʑෝ ᝅ᜽⦽ Ğᬑ, Pull-out test ၰIDT ༉ࢱᇡ₊vࠥaⓍíqᗭ⦹۵äᮥ

⪶ᯙ⦹ᩡ݅. ᯕෝ☖⦹ᩍᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᜽⦹ᇡ⊖

᮹ᩕ⪵ᨱ᮹⦽vࠥᱡ⦹aၽᔾ⧁Ğᬑᇡ₊vࠥaⓍíqᗭ

⦹ᩍԕǍᖒᱡ⦹ಽᯙ⦽᳑ʑᇡ₊❭ᗱᯕၽᔾ⧁ᙹᯩ݅Ł

❱݉ࡽ݅.

(4) ʑ᳕⎹Ⓧญ✙⡍ᰆ᮹vࠥᄡ⪵, ᩕ⪵ᮁྕၰ߈ᥭᬑʑᰍഭ✚

ᖒ॒᮹݅᧲⦽ᇡ₊᳑Õᨱݡ⦽Pull-out test᪡IDT᮹ᇡ₊v

ࠥᔢššĥෝᇥᕾ⦽đŝ, IDTᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊vࠥaPull-out testᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊vࠥᅕ݅ᔢݡᱢᮝಽ׳íᇥ⡍⦹Łᯩᮝӹ

đᱶĥᙹ0.75᮹׳ᮡᔢššĥෝӹ┡ԕᨩ݅. ঑௝ᕽᝅᱽ

⩥ᰆÑ࠺ᮥ༉ᔍ⧁ᙹᯩ۵ၹᅖ⦹ᵲ᮹ᱢᬊᮥ☖⦽ᇡ₊vࠥ

ၰ ᇡ₊⦝ಽ᮹ ✚ᖒ ᇥᕾ ᜽ IDT᮹ ᱢᬊᯕ a܆⧁ äᮝಽ

❱݉ࡽ݅.

ᅙᩑǍ۵ᱲ₊᜾⎹Ⓧญ✙߈ᥭᬑʑ᮹ၹᅖ⦹ᵲᱢᬊᨱ঑ෙ

ᇡ₊⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥá☁⦹۵ʑⅩ݉ĥಽ៉, ʑ᳕pull-out test᮹

Ğᬑၹᅖ⦹ᵲ᮹ᱢᬊᯕᬊᯕ⦹ḡ༜⧁äᮝಽ❱݉⦹ᩍIDT᮹

ᱢᬊᖒᮥŁₑ⦹ᩡ݅. ݉᳑⦹ᵲᨱ᮹⦽pull-out test ၰIDT᮹

ᇡ₊vࠥ۵݅᧲⦽ᇡ₊᳑Õᨱݡ⦹ᩍ׳ᮡᔢššĥෝ⪶ᅕ⦹ᩡ

݅. ঑௝ᕽᅙᩑǍđŝෝ⪽ᬊ⦹ᩍ⨆⬥ၹᅖ⦹ᵲᨱ᮹⦽ᇡ₊

⦝ಽ❭ƕ✚ᖒᮥᇥᕾ⦽⬥ᇡ₊vࠥ/ᇡ₊⦝ಽᨱݡ⦽⣩ḩšญ᮹

ʑⅩᯱഭಽ ⪽ᬊ⦹Łᯱ ⦽݅.

qᔍ᮹ɡ

ᅙᩑǍ۵⦽ǎࠥಽŖᔍᨱᕽḡᬱ⦹۵‘⎹Ⓧญ✙ᱲ₊᜾߈ᥭᬑ ʑ᮹ ⧕ᕾ ᜽ᜅ▽ Ǎ⇶ ၰ ᖅĥ ႊᦩ Łₑ ᩑǍᬊᩎ’ᮥ ☖⦹ᩍ

ᙹ⧪ࡹᨩ᜖ܩ݅. ᩑǍḡᬱᨱ qᔍऽพܩ݅.

References

American Concrete Pavement Association (2008). “Guide to

concrete overlays: Sustainable Solutions for Resurfacing and

Rehabilitating Existing Pavements.” Second Edition, ACPA Pub-

(11)

lication TB021.02P.

American Society for Testing and Materials (1996). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, ASTM C 496.

David A. Lange., and Hak-Chul Shin. (2001). Early age stresses and debonding in bonded concrete overlays, Transportation Research Record (1778). Paper No. 01-0410, pp.174-181.

Expressway and Transportation Research Institute (1997). Pave- ment rehabilitation by concrete overlay (III), Korean Expressway Corporation (in Korean).

Granju J. L. (2001). “Debonding of thin cement-based overlays.”

Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.

114-120.

Huang, Y. H. (2003). Pavement analysis and design, Second Edition.

Prentice Hall, NJ.

Jung, J. D., Ryu, S. W., Han, S. H., Cho, Y. H. (2006). “The perfor- mance analysis of diamond grinding for existing concrete pavement.” Journal of Korean Society of Road Engineers, KSRE, Seoul, Korea, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp.77-88 (in Korean).

Smith, K. D., Yu, H. T., and Peshkin, D. G. (2002). Portland cement concrete overlays: State of the Technology Synthesis, Publi- cation No. FHWA-IF-02-045, Federal Highway Administration.

Korean Expressway Corporation (2009). “Highway construction guide specification” (in Korean).

Lee, S. W., and Son, H. J. (2011). “A study on the factors affecting on the life of bonded concrete overlay pavement using the LTPP data of U.S.A.” Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers,

KSCE, Seoul, Korea, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 555-564 (in Korean).

Lee, S. W., Kim, Y. K., and Lee, P. H. (2011). “A Study on the application of very rapid hardening acrylic polymer modified concrete for bonded concrete overlay method.” Journal of Korean Society of Road Engineers, KSRE, Seoul, Korea, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 139-148 (in Korean).

Lee, S. W., Kim, Y. K., and Han, S. H. (2012). “A Study on the bond-behavior of bonded concrete overlays.” International Journal of Highway Engineering, KSRE, Seoul, Korea, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 31-45 (in Korean).

Lee, S. W., Kim, Y. K., Yoo, T. S., and Han, S. H. (2012). “Analysis of service life and possible causes of early distress for bonded concrete overlays.” International Pavement Engineering Conference 2012, Busan, Korea, pp. 105-119.

M. A. Issa, R. Z. Al-Rousan. (2008). “High performance bonded concrete overlays.” International Conference on Construction and Building Technology, ICCBT2008-(01), pp. 1-20.

Medina-Chavez, C. I., Choi, S. C., and Won, M. (2007). Concrete pavement overlays and failure mechanisms, Report No. 0-4893-2, Certer for Transportation Research.

Peter M. Semen, Raymond S. Rollings (2005). “A Review and discussion of current developments involving bonded concrete overlays of airfield pavements.” International Conference on Concrete Pavements, Colorado, USA, pp. 900-910.

Sprinkel, M. M. and Ozyildirim, C. (2000). “Evaluation of hydraulic cement concrete overlays placed on three pavements in Virginia,”

VTRC 01-R2, Virginia Department of Transportation.

수치

Fig. 1. Mechanistic Characteristics of Concrete Overlays (Huang,  2003)
Table 1. Bond Strength Criteria of BCO.
Table 3. Mixture proportion of concrete Gmax  (mm) Slump(cm) Air (%) W/B (%) S/a  (%) Content (kg/m 3 )
Fig. 6. Bond strength measurement
+4

참조

관련 문서

When fiber posts were cemented into the root canal using total-etch adhesives, the bond strength and adaptation between post and root canal dentin were affected

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between job stress and turnover intention of employed opticians and to investigate the mediating effect of burnout

From the results of Micro Vickers hardness test, Ti- 40Hf alloy showed significantly increasing of hardness and tensile strength than others in the case of

The effects of recycling on the tensile bond strength of new and clinically used stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Material testing of

Scheme of the 3-point flexure test (the dimension of the test configuration are given by lc=8mm, dm=0.5mm, dc=1mm).... Means and standard deviations

Within the limitations of this study, it is concluded that pretreatment of desensitizing agent (Seal&Protect) reduced the bond strength of two-step self-etch adhesive

Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that pretreatment with EDTA or phosphoric acid have negative effect in apical part on push out bond strength of fiber

The average tensile strength value before heat treatment of PLA output was 9.67 N/㎟, and the average tensile strength value after heat treatment was 24.17 N/㎟, which