• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Xtallization rate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Xtallization rate"

Copied!
26
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Chapter 8

Crystallization

(2)

Xtallization rate

“

Xtallization by

 nucleation (at T < Tm) and

 growth (diffusion of chain at T > Tg)

“

nucleation

 free energy change for nucleation

 free E for Xtalliz’n nucleation (< 0) + surface energy (> 0)

~ for spherical nucleus r* ~ critical radius for nucleation

ΔT = Tm0 - Tc ~ supercooling

(3)

“

As ΔT increases,

 r* decreases

 G* decreases

 easier nucleation

“

homogeneous vs heterogeneous nucleation

 ΔT for homogeneous primary nucleation ~ 50 – 100 K

 occurs seldom

 in practice, heterogeneous nucleation

 followed by secondary and tertiary nucleation

(4)

“

overall crystallization rate

 C ~ structural factor

 regularity and flexibility

 C = 0 for atactic (amorphous)

 small C for inflexible polymers

 diffusion

 segmental mobility, motion

 WLF or reptation

 zero at Tg

 nucleation

 zero at Tm

“

measurement of Xtallization rate

 dilatometry

 microscopy

growth nucleation

(5)

Equilibrium melting temperature

“

T

m0

is T

m

of

 infinitely thick crystal for high MW

 extended-chain crystal for low MW

“

determination

 from Thompson-Gibbs eqn

 Lc measured and extrapolated to 1/Lc = 0

 crystal thickening

 prevented by light Xlinking

 superheating ~ Thick crystal melts slowly.

 prevented by slow heating

(6)

“

determination (cont’d)

 from Δhf and Δsf

 extrapolated to infinite MW

 for PE

 Hoffman-Weeks plot

 plot Tm vs Tc, and extrapolate to Tm = Tc

(7)

“

T

m0

and structure

 Tm0 = ΔHf0 / ΔSf0

 ΔHf ~ interchain interaction

 ΔSf ~ chain flexibility

 Tm0 higher for more regular, rigid, closely-packed, and stronger interaction Table 8.1

 Tg and Tm are correlated.

 Tg = (0.5 ~ 0.8) Tm (in K)

(8)

Melting point depression

“

depression by MW

“

depression by diluent (low MW or other polymer)

(9)

Avrami eqn

“

describes time-crystallinity relation

 for any crystallization ~ general

 useful in molding simulation

“

probability of P passed by c waves in t, p(c)

E ~ avg # of passing waves for all P

~ no wave passing ~ remain molten (amorphous)

(10)

“

in athermal nucleation followed by spherical growth

 nucleation at once and start to grow at t= 0

“

in thermal nucleation

 sporadic nucleation ~ constant rate in space and time

g ~ vol conc’n of nuclei

I* ~ # of nuclei/cm3 s

(11)

“

Avrami eqn

 in early stage before impinging

 for diffusion-controlled growth

 diffusion of impurity

 (ŕ t)3 t Æ (ŕ t½)3 t

 n = 2.5 for sporadic nucleation

 high n for ‘high-dimensional’ growth

~ Göler eqn

e-x = 1 – x for small x

(12)

“

Avrami eqn for polymers

 semicrystalline

 n betw 3 and 4

 primary crystallization only

 secondary (subsidiary) crystallization slow

“

experiments

(13)

“

PE

 low MW (< 10000) ~ n = 4

 axialitic growth

 high MW (< 106) ~ n = 3

 spherulitic growth

 UHMWPE ~ n = 2

 slow, low-dimensional growth

(14)

Theories for crystal growth

“

equilibrium theories

 Crystal thickness increases with T to a certain T.

 does not predict the effect of supercooling

 not popular

“

kinetic theories

 The end-state is not of the lowest possible energy.

 Crystal growth rate is dep on Lc, which is determined by supercooling.

 enthalpic nucleation theory ~ Lauritzen-Hoffman theory

 entropic theory ~ Sadler-Gilmer theory

(15)

Lauritzen-Hoffman theory

“

model

(1) Random coil finds a flat surface of substrate crystal.

 needs a substrate ~ secondary nucleation (2) random coil Æ extended chain

 segmental relaxation (3) Chain folds.

 deposit of 1st stem ~ A0/B

 secondary ~ 2 sides (+ 2 ends)

 A0 ~ 2bLcσL ψabLcΔg

 B ~ (1–ψ)abLcΔg

 2nd, 3rd, --- stem ~ A/B

 fold and deposit

 A ~ 2abσ – ψabLcΔg

 B ~ (1–ψ)abLcΔg

Δg ~ defined > 0

(16)

“

rate

“

flux

or

(17)

“

crystal thickness

 agrees well with experimental Lc-ΔT relation

 solution-grown crystals ~ large ΔT ~ small Lc (~10 nm)

 melt-grown crystals ~ small ΔT ~ large Lc

 faster (1) + slower (2) Æ less perfect crystals

Lc,min when Tc = Tm from Thompson-Gibbs eqn

(18)

“

crystallization regimes

 regime I

 small ΔT

 g >> i Æ GI = b iL

 adjacent reentry

 regime II

 g ≤ i Æ GII = b (ig)½

 regime III

 g <(<<) i Æ GIII = b iL

 switchboard

i

Æ T

(19)

“

PE

(20)

Sadler-Gilmer theory

“

based on Xtallization behavior of small molecules

 at T < Tr (roughening temperature)

 growth with faceted surfaces

 at T > Tr

 macroscopically round, microscopically rough

 G ∝ ΔT and log G ∝ 1/(TcΔT)

 free energy barrier is presents at high T, and

 it should be entropic Å Roughening does not require new surface.

“

the same observed in polymer Xtals

 solution-grown PE Xtals, as T increases

 diamond Æ truncated Æ leaf

 melt-grown PE Xtals at high T (regime I), isolated

 rounded crystal with rough surface

(21)

“

Xtallization with ‘segment’

 segment shorter than whole stem (Lc)

 interaction energy betw segment and surface is small

 for PE ~ segment of 6 repeat units with E ~ 0.6 kT

“

Xtallization on a rough surface

 Segments attached to surface randomly. ~ ‘blind attachment’

 Stem growth limited. ~ ‘pinning’

 Non-viable conformations sorted out.

~ ‘detachment’

 Chain extended and parallel to

neighbor participates in crystallization

~ entropic

(22)

“

rate

“

results

(23)

Molecular fractionation

“

separate Xtallization of different species

 structure

 molecular weight

 Chains with M > Mcrit only can crystallize.

 Shorter chains crystallize at a low Temp. ~ subsidiary Xtallization

“

dynamic equilibrium

 betw fully extended-chain crystal and melt

 Species increasing free energy are rejected.

(24)

“

molecular nucleation

 At high T, theory and expt agrees.

 At low T, Mcrit(calc) < Mcrit(expt)

 molecular nucleation before molecular crystallization

 σce ~ free energy associated with chain end, due to entropy reduction of cilia

(25)

“

blends of high- and low-MW polymers

“

blends of linear and branched polymers

 as Tc decreases, L only Æ L and B separately Æ L/B cocrystallize

(26)

Crystallization and property

“

degree of crystallinity

 modulus, yield strength

“

spherulite size

 clarity, toughness

“

structure in spherulite

 toughness

 Keith-Padden theory

 δ = D/G

 D ~ diffusion of impurity

 G ~ radial growth rate

 d ~ coarseness of lamellae

growth nucleation

참조

관련 문서

Any group of species are descended from a common ancestral species, which, over time, split into two species, with these descendents splitting again, and again,

* Often the configuration of atoms that has the minimum free energy after mixing does not have the same crystal structure as either of the pure components. In such cases

(Purpose) Recently early detection of gastric cancer and rate of preoperative staging are increasing due to development of endoscopy and imaging technique,

Oxidative injury and inflamma- tory periodontal disease: The challenge of anti-oxidants to free radicals and reactive oxygen species.. The role of oxygen and

1.41 (a) Free energy surface of a liquid and three solid phases of a ternary system2. (b) A tangential plane construction to the free energy surfaces defined equilibrium

1. Free radical initiator abstract a hydrogen from polymer chains 2. Through chain transfer of propagating chain with polymer chain 3. Polymer mixtures are mechanically

fully developed sea: unlimited fetch and duration of wind; wind energy input is balanced by energy dissipation due to wave breaking.. growing sea: limited fetch and

chair and boat conformation (free of angle strain); not planer with 120° bond angle (fully eclipsed). planer with 120 bond