מۏࣄ
. .
1. 4
2. ,
3. -
? .
1.
2.
3.
4. ?
.
1. SW
2. ?
3.
4.
.
* , , .
( ) 3
· .
: 2016. 10. 31. / : 2016. 11. 21. / : 2016. 11. 30.
.
(deep mind) (AlphaGo)
?1) ,
? (artificial intelligence, AI)
. ,
, “ ”2)
, .
.3)
. (weak AI)
(strong AI)
, .
, HW 24
. [ 1] ,
(performance)
. ,
.
1) , “ ”,
10 3 , 2007; , ,
, 2009; , , , 2014 .
, “ ”, , 2006.6 .
2) , , , 2016, 187 .
3) SW HW ,
.
.
[ 1]
* : (2016, TED)
(contents) .4)
. , ,
. ,
.5) ,
, .
, ·
. ,
. ,
4) . ,
( ) .
‘ ’ . ,
. , ‘ ’ ‘ ’ .
5) , , , 2015, 106 .
( ) . ,
. ‘ ’ . ,
,
.
, .
. ,
. , ‘ ’6)
,
. ,
. , 7) ,
. , ( )
.
. ,
.
.
6) 2010.8.25. 2008 1541 .
7) 2 1 .
.
.
3
. 4
(the 4th Industrial Revolution) ,
(SW) . , 4
, ,
(Klaus Schwab) “
4 21 ”8) .
4 “
1 , 1870 2
, 1969 3
,
”9) . 4
SW , SW
.
8) , 4 , , 2016, 24 .
9) , 2016.9.1. .
[ 2]
* : (2016)
4 SW
.
. , ,
.
.
, .10)
.
. ‘ SW
’ .11) ,
10) , 1978
. ,
(CONTU), , 1994, 33 .
, (
) .12) ,
.
(strong AI) (weak AI) .13)
(singularity)14) .
,
.
“
” . HW
, .
.15) [ 1]
11) ,
.
. ,
. ?
. ,
. .
12) “18
, 2
”
. , , , 1993, 2 .
13) AI, AI, ASI(artificial super intelligence)
AI ,
.
14) “
” . , ,
, 2007, 23 ; “ .
” . , ,
, 2015, 203 .
15) Alex Hern, “Google says machine learning is the future. So I tried it myself”, The Guardian, Tuesday 28 June 2016.
. ,
.
[ 1]
: (2016)
. .
, SW ,
.16) , ,
SW . (TensorFlow)
SW .
SW
. , , ,
.17)
16) .
, HW
. , ECONOMY CHOSUN 141 , 2016,
11 .
17) , ,
. ,
. .
. , .
. ,
, .
(Arther Samuelson) 1959 (machine learning)
“
(field of study that gives computers the ability to learn without being
explicitly programmed)”18) .
.
, “
”19)
. “
,
”20) .
. ,
‘ ’ .
.
18) Prateek Joshi, David Millan Escriva, Vinicius Godoy, OpenCV By Example, Packt Publishing, 2016, p.126.
19) , , , 2016, 101 .
20) , , , 2016, 71 .
[ 3]
: NIA(2016)
(neural network)
. , “
21) ”22) .
, .
. , .
.
, .
21) , “
, ” .
, , , 2015, 150 .
22) , ,
, , (SVM),
. (ANN)
(Input Layer) (Output Layer) (Hidden Layer)
(Deep Neural Network)
. , near&future 19 , 2016, 24 .
[ 4]
: (2016)
,
(feature) .
.
“ , , ,
, ”23) .
, .
.24)
. ,25)
.26) , .
23) , , , 2015-017,
, 2015, 4 . 24) “
” . , “
”, 51 , 2016.6, 233 .
25) “ ‘ ’ ‘
’ ” . ,
2016.7.20. .
. ,
. ,
.
, ,
.27)
. , “
.
”28)
. ,
.29)
?
, ,
( ) . ,
.
, .
.30)
26) , , , 2015-017,
, 2015, 5 .
27) , ,
. , . 28) , near&future 19 , 2016, 33 .
29) .
.
. ,
.
. ,
.
DNA .
. .31)
30) ,
. .
. ‘ ’
.
31) ( , , 2016, 187 ) “
, .
,
. DNA ” .
[ 5] (neural network)
: google(2016)
,
‘ ’ . ,
, . “
. ,
,
.
.
.
. (deep
neural networks, DNN) .
. ,
”32) .
, DNN
.33)
. ,
, .
. ,
. , .
. .
.
. .
, . ,
.
.
. (clone) ,
. ,
32) , , , 2015-017,
, 2015, 5~6 .
33) , , , 2015, 120 , 129 .
. .
.
. .
.
, ,
(corpus) .
. .
, , , . ,
,
.34)
. ,
( 35 3) .
22 .
,
. ,
. ,
.
34) , .
.
, 1 . ,
. , , “
”35). 2
(creative use)36)
. ,
.
.
“ ,
,
”37) .
“
”38) .
. ,
.
, .39) “
2 ”40)
35) , , , 2014, 231~232 .
36) (transformative use) .
, .
37) Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Musin, Inc., 510U.S.569(1994).
38) , , , Books, 2012, 544 .
39) Robert Merges, Peter Menell, Mark Lemley, Intellectual Property in the New Technologital Age, Wolters Kluwer, 2012, p.646.
40) , “ ”, Law&Technology 8 3 , 2012, 70 .
.
, .
.41) ,
( )
. . ,
.42) ,
. ,
“
,
”43) .
. ,
. ,
. ,
41) ,
.
42) 47 7( ) ,
( , , ,
, ,
. ) ,
( 2
) . ,
.
43) , , , 2014, 232 .
. ,
. ,
. ,
,44) .45)
,
(freedom of speech) .46)
44)
(Perfect10, Inc. v. Amazon, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146(9th Cir, 2007)).
45)
,
3 , 2.5 ,
4 , 3
,
,
,
. 2006.02.09. 2005 7793 .
.47)
,
(cultural license) (cultural
permission) . , 2009
, . , “
, , ,
, ,
” .48)
.
‘ ’ .
,
.
. ,
. ,
. ,
. ,
,
. , ,
46)
, . ,
( 6 ), , 2010, 568 .
47) “
” .
, , , 2010, 529~530 .
48) , , , 2014, 381~382
.
.
,
. ,
. , “
” . “ ”
.
. ,
.49)
. ,
. ,
.
,
. ‘ ’ , ,
. ,
. , .
49) , , , 2014, 35 ; · , ( 9 ), ,
2015, 34 .
. ,
. ?
? .
.
[ 6]
: google(2016)
, “ ‘ ’
, ‘ ’
‘ ’
, (Concept)
,
”50) .
50) ‘ ’
, ‘ ’
‘ ’ ,
,
(Concept) ,
( 2014.03.27. 2013 527718 ).
“ ·
· · ·
· ,
”51) . , ‘ ’
“ ” .
, .
.
, . ,
“
. .
”52) . ,
.
. ,
.53)
51) 1999.10.22. 98 112 .
52) , , , 2014, 35 . , “
” . , ( 3 ), , 2015,
35 .
53) “ ,
, . 1
CCTV
. . CCTV
. ,
.
. ,
.
. ,
. ,
,
.
, .
, ,
. ,
.
,
. 2006
” . ,
, , 2007, 25 .
, (2006.12.28.
8101 , ) 2 1
‘ · ’ .
,
.54)
, .
. SW
. ,
. ,
.
,
.
.
. , “
,
”55)
54) 2006 “
·
” . , “ ”,
2006 , 48 .
55) 2011. 2. 10. 2009 291 .
.56) ,
. ,
. “
,
,
,
, , ,
,
”57) .
,
. ,
.
,
.
. , ‘
’ ,
. , ‘ ’ ‘
’
56) “
”
. 1995.11.14. 94 2238
57) 2012.08.30. 2010 70520
.
, ?
. .
, SW ,
. , ?
SW
. , SW
. ,
. ,
. , ,
. ,
.
. ,
. , .
, .
,
. , ?
?
?
. ,
.
,
(contents) .
, . “ ,
.
.”58) , “
, ,
”59) ,
. , ,
. ,
,
. , ,
.60) ,
,
(public domain) .
58) , , , 2007, 27 .
59) , , , 1996, 56 .
60) ,
. ,
.
?
. .
. ,
. ?
. ,
, . , ‘ ’
,
. .
, .
· .
. ,
(coding) ,
. , SW
.
(generated) (works)
. .
, ‘ ’(computer-generated)
( 178
).61) ( 9 ).
,62) .
,
. . ,
61) §178(Minor definition) “computer-generated”, in relation to a work, means that the work is generated by computer in circumstances such that there is no human author of the work;
62) Pamela Samuelson, “Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer Generated Works”, 47 U.Pitt. L.Rev. 1185 1985-1986.
.
. ,
, .
,
. ,
. ,
.
? ,
? 2
, .
,
. 2
,
·
,
·
,
.
·
.
2
.63)
, .
,
.
, . ,
.64)
.
.
“
·
” .
. ,
.
63) 2016.07.29. 2014 16517 .
64) , (public domain) ,
.
.
. “
, , ,
”( 9 3 )
.65)
. , ·
. .
, .
. ,
SW
. ,
, . .
, .
,
.
.
65) “ .
.
. ,
, .”
, , 2016-005, , 2016, 16 .
.
. (melody), (rhythm), (harmony) 3
, 3 ·
.
, .66)
, ?
,
. ,
. ,
. ,
. ,
.67)
66) 2015.08.13. 2013 14828 .
67)
.
(black box)68) .
, .
. .
.69) ,
, .
[ 7]
: google(2016)
,
. ,
. ,
. ,
.
68) “
” . ( ), ,
, 2016, 124 .
69) “
.” . , ECONOMY CHOSUN 141 , 2016, 12 .
“ 2
.
.
,
.
,
”70) .
. , “
, , ,
,
·
”71) . [ 8]
70) 2014.01.29. 2012 73493 .
71) 2014.08.26. 2012 10786 .
.
. .
[ 8]
: (2016)
. ,
. ,
.72)
, .
,
. ,
, .
.
72) “
” .
( ) ,
, ., 29
(productiviy) .
, [ 9]
. ,
.
[ 9]
: (2016, TED)
. ,
, , ,
. ,
.
.73)
73) “‘AI ’
.74)
.
. ,
·
. ,
·
.
( 137 ).
.
,
. ,
, (
‘ ’ )
‘ ’
” . ( )
,
, ., 22
74) 137 ( ) 1
1 .
1. ·
2. ·
.
“
” .
. “
”75)
. , ( )
( ) .76)
. ,
. .
75) “
,
·
.” 2010.8.25. 2008 1541 .
76) , “
”, Law&Technology 11 4 , 2015.7; , “
”, 15 1 , 2011.4 .
, .
‘ ’
.
. ,
“ ,
”77) .
. ,
.
. , 15
.78) ,
.
, .
77) ( ), , , 1989, 21 .
78) 15 ( ) , ,
, , 2
6 18 3 .
, ·
· 2 1 , 3
6 18 3 .
, .
.
. ,
. ,
.
,
. ,
. (
) ,
.
.79)
.
,
(strong AI)
. ,
79) , , 2016-005, , 2016, 18 .
. ,
. ,
. ,
.80)
. ,
. ,
. , ,
.
, ,
. , .
.
, . ,
. .81) ,
. , . ,
, .
,
.
.82)
80) (2015), 178 “
” .
81)
, , 2016-005,
, 2016 . 82) ,
.
,
. .
. , ,
.
. ,
.
.
,
. ,
· .
. “
,
”83)
. ,
.
, . ,
.
. ,
. .
. ,
. ,
83) 2004.11.29. 2004 41 .
.
. ,
. ,
. ,
.
, .
.
.84)
84) EU ,
. Mady Delvaux, Draft Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics(2015/2013(INL)), 2016.5.31.
, , ,
2015-017, , 2015.
, , 2016-005,
, 2016.
, , , 2010.
, ECONOMY CHOSUN 141 , 2016.
, , , 2015.
, ECONOMY CHOSUN 141 , 2016.
, , ,
2009.
, , , 2014.
, “ ”,
15 1 , 2011.4.
, “ ‘ ’ ”, 115
, 2016.
, “ ”, 2006.6 .
· , ( 9 ), , 2015.
, , ( 3 ), ,
2016.
, “ ”, 2006 .
, “
”, 51 , 2016.6.
, “ ”, 10 3 , 2007.
, “ ”,
Law&Technology 11 4 , 2015.7.
, , , 1993.
, ( 3 ), , 2015.
, , , 2014.
, , , 1996.
, near&future 19 , 2016.
, , , 2007.
( ), , , 2016.
,
(CONTU), , 1994.
, “ ”, Law&Technology 8 3
, 2012.
, 4 , , 2016.
, , , Books, 2012.
, ( 6 ), , 2010.
Alex Hern, “Google says machine learning is the future. So I tried it myself”, The Guardian, Tuesday 28 June 2016.
Mady Delvaux, Draft Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics(2015/2013(INL)), 2016.5.31.
Pamela Samuelson, “Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer Generated Works”, 47 U.Pitt. L.Rev. 1185 1985-1986.
Prateek Joshi, David Millan Escriva, Vinicius Godoy, OpenCV By Example, Packt Publishing, 2016.
Robert Merges, Peter Menell, Mark Lemley, Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age, Wolters Kluwer, 2012.
Ugo Pagallo, The Laws of Robots, Springer, 2013.
Annemarie Bridy, “Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author”, Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 5, Spring 2012.
David Silver et al., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search”, NATURE Vol. 529, 28 JANUARY 2016.
Harry Surden, “Machine Learning and Law”, Washington Law Review, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2014.
James Grimmelmann, “Copyright for Literate Robots”, Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming, U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No.
2015-16.
( ), , , 1989.
, , , 2014.
( )
,
, .
< >
( )
. ,
.
‘ ’ . ,
.
.
. ,
. ,
, . ,
( ) ,
.
Abstract
:
Legal Review and Implications for Use and Creation of Works by Artificial Intelligence
Kim, Yun-Myung*85)
Intellectual property is a creative expression of a person's (technical) ideas or feelings. Aside from some exceptions, such as the label protection system of trademarks, inventions and copyrights are generally centered on people. In this regard, the Intellectual Property Law has established protection and use relations on the premise of "the things of the person". However, it is now a relationship between a non-human person and an artificial intelligence or robot. This suggests that the legal relations centered on people can be changed to those that are not people and people. n this paper, I examined the rights and the use of artifacts created by the machine learning process and artificial intelligence by applying the copyright law review and the general rules of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act. Machine learning of artificial intelligence is not different from enjoying works by humans, and it is highly likely that the results are not likely to replace new markets. On the other hand, there is a limitation of protection because the copyright of the work created by artificial intelligence is denied under the current copyright law, and it is difficult to establish the rights relation. In addition, the general clause of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act was examined, but it was limited because it was not a law that could be involved in the formation of a rights relationship.
* Software Policy & Research Institute(SPRi), Senior Researcher, Ph.D. in Law.