The effect of green tea on ultraviolet B-induced sunburn cell production in the skin of hairless mouse
6
0
0
전체 글
(2) *Û*öRN~Î. BW^ ÁB^¢Á&Áê\ÁBFêÁB«¾ÁË« ÁW8
(3). *ÎL >~ çL »Ö ]ö¶K\² OÒFÏ\¦ (²Òß: 2005j 2ú 24¢) 1. 2. The effect of green tea on ultraviolet B-induced sunburn cell production in the skin of hairless mouse Sung-ho Kim*, Se-ra Kim, Hae-june Lee, Jin-hee Lee, Yu-jin Kim, Jong-choon Kim, Jong-sik Jang1, Sung-kee Jo2 College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea 1 Department of Animal Science, Sangju National University, Sangju 742-711, Korea 2 Food Irradiation Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 305-353, Korea (Accepted= February 24, 2005) Abstract : In this study we assessed the influences of ultraviolet (UV) light B radiation on epidermal cells by apoptotic sunburn cell (SBC) and the effect of green tea treatment on the inhibition of SBC formation in SKH1-hr mouse. The extent of changes following 200 mJ/cm2 (0.5 mW/sec) was studied at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 or 36 hours after exposure. SBCs were recognized by 3 hours after irradiation. There was tendency to increase from 3 hours to 24 hours and decrease from then to 36 hours after irradiation. The mice that received 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 or 800 mJ/cm2 of UVB were examined 24 hours after irradiation. The SBCs were induced as the radiation dose increases from 0 to 200 mJ/cm2. A further increase of radiation dose has little further effect. The frequency of UVB (200 mJ/cm2)-induced SBC formation was reduced by intraperitoneal injection of green tea extract (p<0.01). Key words : ultraviolet B, sunburn cell, SKH1-hr mouse, green tea. * V. ¢>'b UV~ 'f ² UVA, UVB, Ò UVC~ 3¦ªb ¾~Ú æº '' «W >' ßWj &æ ®b 2Ë j> 7ö.æ~ · f Ã&>, º Wª¶*~ Öj 2Z ;ê. B Úö ôf æz¢ &^N . UVC(200-280 nm) º J[ö ~ &¦ª W>>, UVA(320-400 nm) 5 UVB(280-320 nm)ò æRö ê> UV7 UVB º 1-10%¢ Næ . b¦ö & 2Ëê UV~ 'Ë j ÚÚ, UVAº êb~ Fv[, >[ræ 'Ëj. *f ¶F(UV)ö Â>º ~ã ³öB Új& ®b UVº >¦ö s>>w, ï²>w, Ò > ¦z, >¦z ~ ·R >¦>wj ¢bÎ . " ï>«~ Ë" .&ÿ~ Ã& R UV Â~ V²Ã&f z®Ú ~ãJ"ö ~R J[ 2Z 5 ö 8 UV~ .&ï Ã& UVö ~ b¦ æz& Ã&> ®º º^ [22]. \º 8F¦ ö¶K\**Òë~ æöb >¯>îr.. *Corresponding author: Sung-ho Kim College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea [Tel: +82-62-530-2837, Fax: +82-62-530-2841, E-mail: [email protected]]. 1.
(4) BW^ÁB^¢Á&Áê\ÁBFêÁB«¾ÁË«ÁW8. 2. ~ êK²f jvî~ »Z êK6², Vz, Î^.&~ {Ë 5 ¶çb b¦~ V&[j f Ê, b¦z B &ËWê &ê . UVBº êb ç[ ¦ræ ê~, /³ zç¾ s>j ¢bÎ . z × ê¯> ¢ò ï² ;W, ï² Ob F ¢Ú¾, ¶çB b¦^
(5) ¢ >~ 'z çj ¢ bʲ >º 'î[~ >ª6²f òW "ª 5 b¦zj FB [6, 22]. UVBº ¢« ‘burning ray’ rJ^ ®b UV~ £ 4-5%ö >Ú ·7~ 'f ¦ªö >æò UVA ö j~ 1000V ç~ ¢7zçj ¢bʺ &Ë ; K º² . $ UVAö j~ F*ëW ;~ " Rb V&^
(6) [ö ·Ï~º ©b rJ^ ®. [30]. öBº UVö ~ b¦¶ç~ æRB ¢7 zç^
(7) (SBC)~ UVB Ò ê * ã" 5 UV Ò ïö 8 æz¢ hairless îÖÊ(SKH1-hr)öB &V~ ' þj F~&b {ãB þ»ö ' Ï~ *ÒOÒF Ë ã6Î" [1, 2, 19, 35]& ®º ©b rJê NºÂ>~ SBC B ÛBÎ"¢ & V~& .. Òò 5 O». þÿ> ¢ Charles River ÒöB \« 7-8"_~ W? hairless îÖÊ(SKH1-hr)¢ ÒÏ~&, ' þöB 6 îÒ¢ ~¾~ þ`b 'Ï~& . ÿ>~ ÒGf Nê 22Û2 C, ç&Ûê 50Û10%, «*f 12* (J* 8 6-Jê 8 ²) 5 ê 200-300 lux J;B JöB >¯~& . BzV*j ö polycarbonate ÒGç¶ö 3îÒO >Ï~& þÿ> Ï ;Òò(â·Òò, ö")f ;>Ë~¢ Û >ê >¢ ¶F² S~ê ~& . Î þÿ>f Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources~ ‘Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animal’(1996, USA)ö &~ /~& . 67 `Ò UVB Òº %öb UVB lamp GL20SE (Sankyo Denki, Japan)¢ Ï~ B· UVB ÒV¢ ÒÏ~ &b %ïf Solarmeter (Solartech, USA) G;~&. . &`j B þ` îÖÊ ã b¦ö UVB ¢ 0.5 mW/sec~ ;ê 200 mJ/cm j 1² Ò~ 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 5 36* êö æz¢ V ~&b, UVB¢ 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 5 800 mJ/ o. . j 1² Ò~ &Ë ¸f SBC BNj ¾æÚº *ö æz¢ V~& . NÎ þj * ò*` 4 5 67`Ò 7öB \« N´(*Î WN'³)j ^ .~, 100 g Ã~> 1,000 ml~ jN b~ 80 C >öB 8* 7û ºÂ Ê ;ªj B *çj 1,000 göB 10ª* öªÒÊ ç[j ~ 6{³»~ ÿÖ 8 . N ºÂ> ~ « ºÂ>Nf £ 12%& . V [1, 2, 3]~ þj ^ ~ N~ 4º, ;"Òþf Ú 7 kg 50 mgj UV Ò * 36*, 12* 5 UV Ò ê 30ªö 3² "Ò~&b, b¦ê
(8) þf VÒ(]Rî)ö N¢ 0.2% b B~ UV Ò * 24*, 15ª 5 UV Ò ê ¯ ê
(9) ~& . ò~ ê
(10) ¦*º îÖÊ ã b¦~ 7j V&b & 3 cm, ^ 4 cm~ º*¢ 'Ï~& . *þ öB áÚê ' * 5 UV Ïïj 'Ï~ &` j B þ` îÖÊ ã b¦ö UVB¢ 0.5 mW/ sec~ ;ê 200 mJ/cm j 1² Ò~& . ¦¦ 5 *ã ¦Ò UV Ò ê * ãö 8 æz Vþf ' V *ö ¦¦j ~&b, UV Òïö 8 B æz þf * þöB &Ë ¸f BNj 24 *ö ¦¦j ~&, N ÎË þf UV Ò ê 24*ö ¦¦j ~& . îÖÊ~ ã 7j V&b & 2 cm, ^ 3 cm º*~ b¦¢ j~ *ã RB· ;{ Çj áV *~ b ¦çj vVÚ «ö ¦O~ 10% 7W
(11) öÖ ö ;~& . ;B çf "G æOj B~ ' vþ ¶ ê îÒ 3-4BO öÛηb 6 j Ûç' O»ö 8¢ 2¢f
(12) , .Þj B·~ hematoxylin 5 eosin "ïj ~& . *ã 400V VN 20 ¢öB ¾æ¾º SBC~ >¢ G;~ cm > ~Ö~& . Ûêª+ Î W'f ï 5 R&ÞN R~&b, Ûê ªCf Graph PAD In Plot *Î(Graph PAD Software, USA)j ÒÏ~& .. cm2. o. 2. Ö . 2. 67. `Ò ê * 5 Ïïê æz j Ò~æ pf çöBº ï 0.31B~ SBC. UV.
(13) ¶F B Ò hairless îÖÊöB ¢%zç^
(14) * ÛBö N~ Î. 3. Table 2. Dose-response experiments for sunburn cell (SBC) production 24 hours after UV irradiation UVB dose (mJ/cm2). Number of SBC (mean±S.D.) per cm length of epidermis. 0 25 50 100 200 400 800. 0.33±0.28 28.91±1.81 46.85±13.25 56.16±16.63 81.61±8.68 74.52±9.36 76.89±2.00. Table 3. Effect of intraperitoneal injection or topical application of green tea on UVB-induced increases in apoptotic sunburn cells. Fig. 1. Sunburn cells in SKH1-hr mouse skin after UV exposure. Morphology as seen under the light microscope of (A) untreated skin and (B) UVB irradiated skin with sunburn cells (arrow). H-E stain, X100.. & &V>î 200 mJ/cm j Ò ê 3*¦V ³» B " ; ÖW^W~ ^
(15) îj ßûb ~º SBC (Fig. 1)& &V>V ·~ 6*ö /³® Ã&~&. . 12-24*ö jÝ >&~ ¸f >~¢ Fæ~ & 30*ö £ 50% 6²~ 36*öº /Ï 6² ¢ ¾æî (Table 1). UV Ò ê 24*ö G; UV Ò Ïïê æzº 25 mJ/cm öB¦V SBC& &V> 2. 2. Table 1. Sunburn cell (SBC) production according to the time course after UV irradiation (200 mJ/cm2) Hours after irradiation. Number of SBC (mean ±S.D.) per cm length of epidermis. 0 3 6 12 18 24 30 36. 0.31± 0.49 5.66± 2.67 51.91± 2.47 62.26±24.01 57.87±15.72 61.64±15.25 31.45±15.25 5.91± 3.13. Experimental group. Number of sunburn cells per cm length of epidermis (mean ±S.D.). Normal control Radiation controla Green tea+radiation+green teaa. 0.41± 0.38 74.57±10.74 47.89± 4.06*. Normal control Radiation controlb Green tea+radiation+green teab. 0.31± 0.42 60.77±13.49 50.08± 9.86. The SKH1-hr mice (n=6) were treated with UVB (200 mJ/ cm2) and were sacrificed 24 hours later. a Green tea (50 mg/kg of body weight) or vehicle was given i.p. at 36 and 12 hours before irradiation, and 30 minutes after irradiation. b Green tea cream (0.2%) or cream base (vehicle) was topically treated at 24 hours and 15 minutes before irradiation, and immediately after irradiation. * p<0.01 as compared with radiation control group.. Ú 200 mJ/cm öB &Ë ¸f >~¢ & 25-200 mJ/ cm ~ Ïïræº Ïïö jf~ Ã&~&b¾ 200 mJ/cm ç~ ÏïöB SBCº z ç Ã&~æ p~ b, 400 5 800 mJ/cm ~ ÏïöBê Rb^
(16) ~ Z Òº ìî (Table 2). N4
(17) ~ Î ;ç&öBº 0.31 5 0.41B~ SBC& &V>î b UV 200 mJ/cm Òö 8¢ /Ï® Ã&~& N 4 ï~¢ V&b ;"ÒöBº 35.8%(p<0.01) Ûê' F~W ®² 6²~&b, b ¦ê
(18) öBº ï~öB 17.6% 6²¢ ¾æÚ¾ B ÚNö 8¢ F~Wf ìî (Table 3). 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.
(19) BW^ÁB^¢Á&Áê\ÁBFêÁB«¾ÁË«ÁW8. 4. 8. & b¦ö Ò> /òW~ · b¦>wj .¾ . /W>wbº s>, ï²>w, b¦~ vþ æz j > ® . s>>wf 'î^
(20) 5 êb^
(21) &~ êb .&j {Ëʺ >wb UV ~ 2Ë, 7ï, b¦~ , ~ã ö V¢ ¢æ , b¦öº 'î^
(22) & æ;B SBC& Â* . ï² >wf ¢ò^
(23) & &~º >wbB, UV Ò ê ¯ b¦& ¦²>º ¯ ï²O" >¢ ê ¢Ú¾ º æ ï²Ob ¾2 > ® . ï²>w" b¦v þ~ æz f UV¦V Ú¢ ^~V * OÚ ·Ï~ ¢« . UVö ~ òW>wbº 7z * ç" 7Bz *ç ®b 7zº ËV*ö 7  ' b¦z¢ ö~ Ò' zfº N¢ ¾æÞ [22]. UV Òö ~ Rb~ ¶çf 2* Úö ·B. [20]. &Ë .V~ ¶çæRº keratinosome~ 6² , Ò ê 16-18*ö ^
(24) Ú ¦«(intracellular edema) ¢Ú¾ 30-48*ö ^
(25) Ò ¦«(intercellular edema) ¢Ú¾ "* 'î^
(26) ~ ¶çb B*B. . SBCº ¦« &V>V ç*ö Æ ¾æ¾º © b rJ^ ® [20]. SBCº apoptosis~ &Ë .V B ~ . 7 &æ *"> [7, 18], UVö ~ Fê B apoptotic cellf "* 'î^
(27) ö ~ ³~² ö B [26].
(28) ^
(29) $ öö ^~ UVB Ò ê b¦Ú >ê /Ï® Ã&B [8]. UVö ~ F ê>º apoptosisº ¯;" æ;~ v &æ «~ ¾æÂ . æ;f free radicalö ~ ¶ç º UV ö ~ DNA ¶çö ~ B>º ©b 'B. [15]. $ ¯; apoptosisº Wî Wj º~æ pº Wº²ö ~ ©b , ö >~ æ ;f Wî Wj º [15]. 'î^
(30) ~ æWf ÒãÚ~ «&, 2, ^
(31) î~ ³», ³»~ ;¢ ¾æÞ [5, 10, 24, 25]. Woodcock" Magnus [34]º îÖÊöB UV Ò ê * ã"ö 8 SBC~ ;ï' G;öB 300 nm ï7b 80 mJ/cm Ò ê SBCº 5* ê¦V &V >Ú 24*ö &Ë *&~& 254 nm ï7b 70 mJ/cm Òöº 2.5* ê¦V &V>Ú 8* ê ö &Ë ôf >¢ ¾æî v ãÖ Îv 72* ê r æê >² SBC& &V>î ~& . [4]f UVB 80 mJ/cm j Ò ê 2*¦V SBC& &V> Ú 8 5 24*ö ~¢ 36*¦V /Ï® 6²~ 1"ræ &VB ~& . Ò²öB~ º Rosario [28] UV Ò ê 24*¦V &V~ UV. 2. 2. 2. &º r¦V ã~² &V>Ú 72*ö *&~& b 1" êræ *& ç¢ Fæ ~&, Gilchrest [14]f UVB Ò 30ª¦V SBC& &V> V ·~ 24*ö ~¢ ¾æî 72* êr æ ã~² & ~& . Willis [33]º ¢7Â ê ¢7zç>w 8-12* ê¦V &V> 18Úæ 24 *ö SBC& 3" êö b¦& ;ç >î ~& . þöB UVB 200 mJ/cm j Ò~ SBC ~ *' æz¢ &V : 3* ê¦V &V>Ú 1224*ö jÝ ;ê~ ¸f >~¢ Fæ~ 30* ö .>b 6²~& 36*ö /Ï® 6²~& . Ö"º Woodcock" Magnus [34]~ þöB 300 nm ï7j ÒÏ Ö"f, Gilchrest [14]~ Ö"f FÒ~& Woodcock" Magnus [34]~ þö B 254 nm ï7 ÒÏ þ 5 [4]~ þöB ~ Ö"ö j~ ~ ê* ² æB Ö" ¢ ¾æî . ~ ê*~ Nº Woodcock" Magnus [34], 5 [4] ÒÏ UV Ò& ¢¦ UVC¢
(32) çö V N ÒòB . UV Òïö V SBC~ B æzö &~ Johnson [17]f Ò²öB ²s>ïb ¦V ²s>ï~ 16Vræ Ã&Úö V¢ SBC~ >& Ã& ~ & Woodcock" Magnus [34]º îÖÊöB 260-300 nmö ³~º 'V ï7~ Òï" SBC B ï ~º Ïï>w&ê(log dose-response relationship) & ® ~&b¾, [19]f çFÏï>w&ê (dose-response relationship)& ® ~&b 450 mJ/ cm j Ò öBº Rb~ ZÒ SBC~ > ¢ G; > ì ~& . öB 200 mJ/cm ç~ ÏïöB SBC& Ã&>æ pf 6" 400 5 800 mJ/cm ~ ÒïöBê b¦~ ZÒ& &V>æ pf 6 f Woodcockf Magnus [34], 5 [4]~ f jv r G; V& * 5 7ö~ N ¢ ¦ &êB ©b Òò>, [4]~ öB, B W'f 160 mJ/cm ~ ÏïöBº çFÏï>w&ê ¢ ¾æÚæò 160 mJ/cm " 320 mJ/cm ~ ÏïöBº Ã&¢ ¾æÚÚ ~ Ö"f FÒ~& . Nº >Âj *¦V " jjöB rò ÒÏ >îb ¢¦ ~ò' Ï'b 'Ï>Vê ~& . " ' 7" ¦~ N~ ~' ÎËö & & ê~&b¾ " N~ > Î", à ; Î", z 5 .& î~ö & Î"ö ôf &" & ê¯> ® [12, 23, 29]. Nº ;K Ö z Î"¢ ¾æÚº polyphenol~& rJ^ ®b [9, 11, 16] ~ ÎËf .& î~öBº LDLcholesterolj Ôºº Öz Î"f free radical scavenging 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.
(33) ¶F B `Ò hairless îÖÊöB ¢%zç^
(34) * Û*ö R N~ Î. Î"¢ ¾æÚ, Bz>î~ ë β~ ;W" VJ ö &~º &Òβf &êB ëêÛ~ ¶·Ï rJ^ ®b, z~ ;W" &êB ^
(35) ª, WËj Û B~, zB~ initiation" promotionö &~º z' marker¢ ÛB~, F*æ¢ Oæ~º ·Ï rJ^ ® [32, 36]. " Nº zB~ æ·Ï " þ z~ò ~¶~ z ÒBÛB¢ * >b ' Ï >®b öB ; rò& jî¢ z.O £ ~ Bvbræ '7j A ® [13]. b¦¶çö & N~ Î"º 6îF ÒîÖÊö B ^>î^
(36) ~ apoptosis B ÛBÎ"& >î [19], UVö ~ FêB b¦«·j æò SKH-1 îÖ ÊöB N polyphenol ºÂ> 4& WËj ÛB~º Î"& ®b ©f N~ polyphenol~ Wª~ 'Ë ¢ ~& [31]. $ hairlessîÖÊöB UVB¢ Ò b¦ç~ W. J, s>, ¦« "Ã>w " b¦~ 7BzWj ÛB º & ®b¾ [27], Ú b¦öB apoptosis Bö & ç7' º. ² ê~, N¢ b¦ö ² 'Ï þöB SBC~ B ÛB>î º [3]f þ N ã 4 öB UVö ~ SBC~ Bj >& Ã& 8 º ç>B Ö"& [21]>Vê ~& . öB N~ ;Ú "ÒöB ; ÛB Î"¢ ¾ æîb¾, b¦ê
(37) ~ ãÖ F~W ®º Î"º ìî. . N 4~ Î"º Væ >' 5 þ& Ú [30]öBf ? N~ ÖzWªö ~ Î " ºG>¾ ö & º& & ºB .. Ö V. SHK1-hr îÖÊöB UVB Ò ê * ã" 5 ÒÏïê SBC~ ;W æzf N4~ Î"¢ &V ~& . UVB 200 mJ/cm (0.5 mW/sec)j Ò~ 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 5 36* êö æz¢ &V : Ò ê 3*¦V SBC& &V>î 24*ræ Ã&>. & 30*¦V 6²~& . UVB¢ 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 5 800 mJ Ò~ 24*ö æz¢ &V : 200 mJ ræº SBC~ B Ã&>îb¾ ç~ ÒÏïöB æzº ìî . N ;Ú "ÒöB UVBö ~ SBC ;Wf ï~¢ V&b 35.8% 6 ²>î (p<0.01). 2. ^^ò. 1.. B^¢, , B9^. 6îF Ò îÖÊöB N 5 ª³~ OÒF Ë ã6 Î. >~². 5. Bæ^2003, ¢ 43,633-639. BZã, ê\, J8+, ;Æ, J ò, `9, 8, B9, ^. 6îFj Ò îÖÊöB N Ë84~ Î. ]ªç>~²æ 2003, 20, 159-165. f f\ \, «², Iê, ;ã, BÏ, .\, ; 3. > Ï×. NºÂ> Wª catechin ¶Fö , ~ ¶ç* b¦ö ~º 'Ë. ]®*n* 2001, 16, 117-124. `W²æ %, JÒ JÒ¢ ¢, F F . ¶F Òö ~ v b 4. ¦öB~ ¢%zç^~ ;ï' æz. b¦ ²æ 1986, 24, 8-15. 2.. 5. Aberer W, Schuler G, Stingl G, Honigsmann H, Wolff K. Ultraviolet light depletes surface markers of Langerhans cells. J Invest Dermatol 1981, 76, 202-210. 6. Bissett DL, Hannon DP, Orr TV. An animal model of solar-aged skin: histological, physical, and visible changes in UV-irradiated hairless mouse skin. Photochem Photobiol 1987, 46, 367-378. 7. Clydesdale GJ, Dandie GW, Muller HK. Ultraviolet light induced injury: immunological and inflammatory effects. Immunol Cell Biol 2001, 79, 547-568. 8. Cooper KD, Duraiswamy N, Hammerberg C, Allen E, Kimbrough-Green C, Dillon W, Thomas D. Neutrophils, differentiated macrophages, and monocyte/ macrophage antigen presenting cells infiltrate murine epidermis after UV injury. J Invest Dermatol 1993, 101, 155-163. 9. Cotelle N, Bernier JL, Henichart JP, Catteau JP, Gaydou E, Wallet JC. Scavenger and antioxidant properties of ten synthetic flavones. Free Radic Biol Med 1992, 13, 211-219. 10. Daniels F, Brophy D, Lobitz WC. Histochemical responses of human skin following ultraviolet irradiation. J Invest Dermatol 1961, 37, 351-357. 11. Dreosti IE. Bioactive ingredients: antioxidants and polyphenols in tea. Nutr Rev 1996, 54, S51-58. 12. Dufresne CJ, Farnworth ER. A review of latest research findings on the health promotion properties of tea. J Nutr Biochem 2001, 12, 404-421. 13. Fujiki H, Suganuma M, Imai K, Nakachi K. Green tea: cancer preventive beverage and/or drug. Cancer Lett 2002, 188, 9-13. 14. Gilchrest BA, Soter NA, Stoff JS, Mihm MCJr. The human sunburn reaction: histologic and biochemical studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981, 5, 411-422. 15. Godar DE. Preprogrammed and programmed cell death mechanisms of apoptosis: UV-induced immediate and delayed apoptosis. Photochem Photobiol 1996, 63,.
(38) 6. BW^ÁB^¢Á&Áê\ÁBFêÁB«¾ÁË«ÁW8. 825-830. 16. Guo Q, Zhao B, Li M, Shen S, Xin W. Studies on protective mechanisms of four components of green tea polyphenols against lipid peroxidation in synaptosomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996, 1304, 210-222. 17. Johnson BE, Mandell G, Daniels FJr. Melanin and cellular reactions to ultraviolet radiation. Nat New Biol 1972, 235, 147-149. 18. Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer 1972, 26, 239-257. 19. Kim SH, Kim SR, Lee HJ, Oh H, Ryu SY, Lee YS, Kim TH, Jo SK. Apoptosis in growing hair follicles following gamma-irradiation and application for the evaluation of radioprotective agents. In Vivo 2003, 17, 211-214. 20. Logan G, Wilhelm DL. Vascular permeability changes in inflammation. I. The role of endogenous permeability factors in ultraviolet injury. Br J Exp Pathol 1966, 47, 300-314. 21. Lu YP, Lou YR, Li XH, Xie JG, Brash D, Huang MT, Conney AH. Stimulatory effect of oral administration of green tea or caffeine on ultraviolet light-induced increases in epidermal wild-type p53, p21(WAF1/CIP1), and apoptotic sunburn cells in SKH1 mice. Cancer Res 2000, 60, 4785-4791. 22. Matsumura Y, Ananthaswamy HN. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004, 195, 298-308. 23. Mitscher LA, Jung M, Shankel D, Dou JH, Steele L, Pillai SP. Chemoprotection: a review of the potential therapeutic antioxident properties of green tea (Camellia sinensis) and certain its constituents. Med Res Rev 1997, 17, 327-365. 24. Nix TE, Nordquist RE, Everett MA. Ultrastructural changes induced by ultraviolet light in human epidermis: granular and transitional cell layers. J Ultrastruct Res 1965, 12, 547-573. 25. Obata M, Tagami H. Alteration in murine epidermal. 26.. 27.. 28.. 29. 30.. 31.. 32.. 33. 34.. 35.. 36.. Langerhans cell population by various UV irradiations: quantitative and morphologic studies on the effects of various wavelengths of monochromatic radiation on Iabearing cells. J Invest Dermatol 1985, 84, 139-145. Olson RL, Everett MA. Epidermal apoptosis: cell deletion by phagocytosis. J Cutan Pathol 1975, 2, 5357. Record IR, Dreosti IE. Protection by black tea and green tea against UVB and UVA + B induced skin cancer in hairless mice. Mutat Res 1998, 422, 191-199. Rosario R, Mark GJ, Parrish JA, Mihm MCJr. Histological changes produced in skin by equally erythemogenic doses of UV-A, UV-B, UV-C and UVA with psoralens. Br J Dermatol 1979, 101, 299-308. Sato T, Miyata G. The nutraceutical benefit, part I: green tea. Nutrition 2000, 16, 315-317. Svobodova A, Psotova J, Walterova D. Natural phenolics in the prevention of UV-induced skin damage. A review. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2003, 147, 137-145. Wang ZY, Agarwal R, Bickers DR, Mukhtar H. Protection against ultraviolet B radiation-induced photocarcinogenesis in hairless mice by green tea polyphenols. Carcinogenesis 1991, 12, 1527-1530. Weisburger JH. Tea and health: the underlying mechanism. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1999, 220, 271275. Willis I. Sunburn and sunscreen. Unit 19-6, 11th ed, Harper & Row, Philadelphia, 1984. Woodcock A, Magnus IA. The sunburn cell in mouse skin: preliminary quantitative studies on its production. Br J Dermatol 1976, 95, 459-468. Yoshioka H, Akai G, Yoshinaga K, Hasegawa K, Yoshioka H. Protecting effect of a green tea percolate and its main constituents against gamma ray-induced scission of DNA. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1996, 60, 117-119. Zloch Z. The role of dietary plant polyphenols in health maintenance. Cas Lek Cesk 1996, 135, 84-88..
(39)
관련 문서
Therapeutic Effect of Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus on Induced Radioresistant Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma*.. Se-Heon Kim, M.D., Eun Chang Choi, M.D., Jin Seok Lee,
‡ Bu-Zhong- Yi-Qi-Tang cream (0.2%) or cream base (vehicle) was topi- cally treated at 24 h and 15 min before irradiation, and imme- diately after
A Study on the Structural Relationships among Selection Attributes, Satisfaction, and Loyalty of Green Tea Consumers: The Moderating Effect of Involvement.. Kyung-Hee Kim