서 론
2008 10 2003
2005
4 8
1)
. , 2001 2005
5 10
18.9% 7.8%, 15.5%
22.3%
1).
,
2-6)
.
1)
.
, ,
7-11)
.
, ,
12-13)
. Clinical Analysis of 312 Patients with Hepatobiliary Cancer in Oriental Hospital
Tae-Young Jeong, Bong-Ky Park, Jung-Hyo Cho, Chang-Gue Son Liver-Immune Center, Daejeon Oriental Hospital of Daejeon Univ
Objective: This study sought a clinical analysis of hepatobiliary cancer patients treated by oriental medical therapy.
Methods: 312 hepatobiliary cancer patients treated in East-west Cancer Center of Dunsan Oriental Hospital from October 2004 to September 2008 were reviewed. These patients’ general characteristics and clinical change after treatment were investigated.
Results: 83.3% of patients’ tumors were stage IV. The median survival period of stage IV patients was 107.0±82.2 (IVa), 207.0±26.8 (IVb) days (hepatocellular carcinoma), 132.0±15.8 days (cholangiocarcinoma), and 203.0±24.6 days (gallbladder carcinoma).
Conclusions: This study presents the general characteristics of hepatobiliary cancer patients treated by Oriental medical therapies, and thus would be valuable for further studies of Oriental medicine-based cancer treatments.
Key Words : Oriental medicine, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, survival 정태영, 박봉기, 조정효, 손창규
대전대학교 한의과대학 간장내과학교실 Case Report
Received:27 May 2009 Revised:15 July 2009 Accepted:20 July 2009
Correspondence to:손창규
(301-724) 대전시 중구 대흥동 대전대 22-5 대전대학교 한방병원 면역내과센터
Tel:+82-42-229-6723, Fax:+82-42-254-3403, Emai:[email protected]
,
14-16)
.
17)
.
18,19)
.
2004 10 2008 9
4 312
.
연구방법
1. 연구 대상 및 기간
2004 10 1 2008 9 30 4
. , ,
312 .
2. 분석 항목 및 평가 방법
Table 1 .
.
General characteristics of patients Gender Male / Female
Age Age at first visit
Treatment history Operation / Chemotherapy / Radiation therapy / Etc.
Purpose of first visit Management after completion of conventional treatment / Combination therapy with east and west medicine / Only oriental medical therapy/ Hospice care / Others
Stage According to UICC stage classification
24,25)Viral hepatits
antigen career Yes or No(HBV or HCV) Liver cirrhosis Yes or No
Sasang constitution Classify one of three(Soumin, Taumin, Soyangin) by QSCC II(Questionnare for Sasang Constitution Classification II)
Child Pugh score Classify Class A or B or C
Treatment in Oriental hospital Treatment period Duration of taking medicine
Medication Use or Not use CGX
*/ HAD † / Herb medication
Clinical change after treatment Clinical score ECOG / Child Pugh score
Survival Analysis Median survival
*Chungan plus †Hang-Am-Dan
Table 1.
1)
, , , , , ,
, , ECOG
20)(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group perfomance status), Child Pugh score
21)2)
22)
,
23),
3)
ECOG, Child Pugh score ,
,
.
. ECOG Child
Pugh score 1
. 30
. ,
.
2
2
.
3. 통계분석
Kaplan-Meier ,
Log-Rank test .
paired t-test .
5% .
결 과
1. 환자의 특징
312
Table 2 .
198 , 80 , 34
.
TACE ,
, .
34.3%,
30.8% .
83.3% IV
. 89.4%
B ,
. 37.6%
, .
33
57.6% , (30.3%),
(12.1%) . Child pugh score A
59.7% , B(30.8%),
C(9.4%) .
2. 환자들이 받은 치료에 관한 특징
, ,
Table 3 .
32 ,
30 , 35 , 53.5 .
85.4%,
70.0%, 64.7%
.
56.1%, 58.7% (Table 3).
3. 환자들의 치료 경과
1) ECOG Child Pugh score 1
.
ECOG Child Pugh score .
ECOG
. 25.0%,
26.5%, 11.1%
.
Total HCC
*Cholangio
†GB
‡Number
§312 198 (63.5) 80 (25.6) 34 (10.9)
Gender Male 234 (75.0) 166 (83.8) 51 (63.8) 17 (50.0)
Female 78 (25.0) 32 (16.2) 29 (36.3) 17 (50.0)
Age Average (year) 56.3±10.2 54.5±9.7 60.4±10.2 60.6±10.8
Treatment history (Overlapping
statistics)
Number 238 156 (78.0) 56 (70.0) 26 (76.5)
Operation 77 (32.4) 39 (19.7) 22 (27.5) 16 (47.1)
TACE
∥126 (52.9) 121 (61.1) 5 (6.3) 0 (0.00)
RFA
¶16 (6.7) 15 (7.6) 1 (1.3) 0 (0.0)
CTx
**75 (31.5) 33 (16.7) 31 (38.8) 11 (32.4)
RTx
++52 (21.8) 31 (15.7) 13 (16.3) 8 (23.5)
Etc. 24 (10.1) 2 (1.0) 17 (21.3) 5 (14.7)
Purpose of the first visit
Number 312 198 80 34
Management after completion of
conventional treatment 21 (6.7) 18 (9.1) 1 (1.3) 2 (5.9)
Combination therapy with east and west
medicine 107 (34.3) 71 (35.9) 26 (33.0) 10 (29.4)
Only oriental medical
therapy 96 (30.8) 51 (25.8) 33 (41.3) 12 (35.3)
Hospice care 33 (10.6) 24 (12.2) 6 (7.6) 3 (8.8)
Others 54 (17.3) 34 (17.2) 14 (16.3) 7 (20.6)
Stage
Number 191 115 50 26
Ⅰ 4 (2.1) 3 (2.6) 1 (2.0) 0 (0.0)
Ⅱ 11 (5.8) 7 (6.1) 1 (2.0) 3 (11.5)
Ⅲ 16 (8.4) 10 (8.7) 5 (10.) 1 (3.9)
Ⅳ 159 (83.3) Ⅳa 16 (13.91)
43 (87.8) 22 (84.6)
Ⅳb 78 (67.83) Viral hepatitis
antigen career
Number 240 169 55 16
B 162 (67.5) 151 (89.4) 10 (18.2) 1 (6.3)
C 9 (3.8) 8 (4.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (6.3)
None 70 (29.2) 10 (5.9) 45 (81.8) 15 (93.8)
Liver cirrhosis (LC)
Nember 257 165 65 27
LC 65 (25.3) 62 (37.6) 3 (4.6) 0 (0.0)
None 192 (74.7) 103 (62.4) 62 (95.4) 27 (100.0)
Sasang Constitution
Number 33 27 6 0
Taeumin 10 (30.3) 8 (29.6) 2 (33.3)
Soyangin 4 (12.1) 4 (14.8) 0 (0.0)
Soumin 19 (57.6) 15 (55.6) 4 (66.7)
Child Pugh Score
Number 159 100 42 17
A 95 (59.7) 55 (55.0) 26 (61.90) 14 (82.4)
B 49 (30.8) 33 (33.0) 13 (31.0) 3 (17.7)
C 15 (9.4) 12 (12.0) 3 (7.1) 0 (0.0)
*
Hepatocellular carcinoma
†Cholangiocarcinoma
‡Gallbladder cancer §Number of patients
∥Transarterial chemoembolization
¶Radio-frequency ablation
**
Chemotherapy
++Radiation therapy
Table 2.
ECOG (p<0.05), (p>0.05) (Fig. 1).
Child Pugh score , ,
A,B,C ,
Total HCC
*Cholangio
†GB
‡Administration period Median(day) 32.0 30.0 35.0 53.5
CGX
§Use 247 (79.2) 169 (85.4) 56 (70.0) 22 (64.7)
Not use 65 (20.8) 29 (14.7) 24 (30.0) 12 (35.3)
HAD
∥Use 175 (56.1) 108 (54.6) 46 (57.5) 21 (61.8)
Not use 137 (43.9) 90 (45.5) 34 (42.5) 13 (38.2)
Herb medication Use 183 (58.7) 118 (59.6) 41 (51.3) 24 (70.6)
Not use 129 (41.3) 80 (40.4) 39 (48.8) 10 (29.4)
*
Hepatocellular carcinoma
†Cholangiocarcinoma
‡Gallbladder cancer
§Chungan plus
∥Hang-Am-Dan Table 3.
75.0
25.0 26.5
73.5
88.9
11.1
%
0 0 0
Cholangio GB
HCC
Improved Unchange Aggravated
A A A A
57.9
42.1
26.7 66.7
80.0
20.0
%
0
6.7
0
Cholangio GB
HCC
Improved Unchange Aggravated
B
B B
B
Fig. 1.
.
1 . 42.1%,
26.7%, 20.0%
.
(p<0.05), (p>0.05)
(Fig. 1).
2)
381.0±
78.6, 148.0±20.0, 241.0±45.3
. 1,2,3
. IVa
107.0±82.2 , IVb
207.0±26.8 . 4
132.0±15.8, 203.0±24.6 (Table 4, Fig. 2).
고 찰
,
.
,
80% IV .
III IV
3,26-28)
. Child Pugh
score , 2007 score
26)
.
Stage No. Median Survival (day) 95% C.I.
*(Min~Max) P value
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Total 81 381.0 ± 78.6 226.9~535.1 NS
‡(0.06)
I 3 NR
†II 5 759.0 ± 218.0 331.7~1186.3
III 8 412.0 ± 122.3 172.2~651.8
IVa 9 107.0 ± 82.2 0~268.2
IVb 33 207.0 ± 26.8 112.6~301.4
Cholangiocarcinoma
Total 39 148.0 ± 20.0 108.8~187.2 NS(0.8)
I 1 NR
II 1 NR
III 1 239.0
IV 17 132.0 ± 15.8 101.1~162.9
Gallbladder cancer
Total 17 241.0 ± 45.3 152.3~329.7 NS(0.6)
I 0
II 2 205.0
III 0
IV 11 203.0 ± 24.6 110.2~295.8
*
Confidence interval
†Not reached
‡Not significance
Table 4.
.
B
26)
.
37.6%
3)
. ,
.
.
.
60%
.
Duration(day) Duration(day)
C um ula tiv e su rv iv al
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.00 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.0 1200.0
4A 4BC um ula tiv e su rv iv al
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
A A
A A B B B B
Duration(day)
C um ula tiv e su rv iv al
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
C C C C
Fig. 2.
22)
23)
, .
.
, , (QOL)
.
.
, ECOG
, Child Pugh score
. Child Pugh score ,
3,26,28)
.
ECOG Child Pugh score
.
Stage IV , Child Pugh score . Child Pugh score
, ECOG
Child pugh score 50%
3,9,26,29-31)
.
Stage IV
, Stage IVa
IVb
Stage IVa
. Stage IV
2007
Stage IVa 4.3
, IVb 3.7
26). 2006
Stage IVa 4
, IVb 3
3)
. IVa
3.6 , IVb 6.9 , IVa
IVb
. 2000
Stage IVb
4.3
9).
Stage
IV 3~6
32-36)