Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Today- Oct. 31 st
• Questions? Projects?
• Review
– Speech Processing
• Recent updates
– By major commercial CI manufacturers – New Technologies
1
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
2
Review
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Human Speech Generation
3
• Vocal fold generates sound that consists of fundamental and harmonic frequencies (source of sound)
• Vocal tract modifies amplitudes of these frequency
components to make the sound distinguishable from
others (articulation by vocal tract).
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Consonants/vowels/formants
4
Consonant and vowels
• Articulations at various places in vocal tract
• Roughly speaking,
• Vowels are lower frequency sounds
• Consonants are higher frequency sounds
• Formants are distinct frequency bands in the sound spectrogram
• F1 and F2 may be used to represent vowels
• Consonants may need additional higher frequency formants to be distinguished
• F0 is the fundamental frequency of the pitch
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
How we hear
5
• Temporal (Rate) code theory
• Place code theory
• Volley theory
• We use both Temporal(Rate) and Place Cues in hearing.
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Hearing by Cochlear Implant
6
• Extracted features are used
• F0/F1/F2
• Analog waveforms are used
• Compressed Analog
• CIS uses extracted features and biphasic pulse
stimulation at a constant rate
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
What to improve
7
1.
2.
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Development of Present and future
Cochlear Implant Products and Performance
8
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
CI Milestones
• 1960 Single channel CI on three patients by William House
• 1976 A Multichannel CI on two patients by Graeme Clark
• 1977 Bilger report confirmed effectiveness of multichannel CI
• 1985 Nucleus 22 became the first Multichannel CI approved by FDA
• 1991 CIS speech processing strategy (Blake Wilson)
• 1997 Clarion (Advanced Bionics) device approved by FDA
• 2001 Medel device approved by FDA
• 2000’s EAS and Bilateral CI Other milestone
• 1997 DBS (Activa manufactured by Medtronic) approved by FDA as a treatment for essential tremor and Parkinson's disease.
Dystonia in 2003, and OCD in 2009.
• 2013 Argus II retinal implant (manufactured by Second Sight Medical Products) approved by FDA
9
F.G.Zeng et al., (IEEE Review in Biomedical Engineering, 2008)
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
History of the Cochlear Implant
• Pioneers
– Andre Djourno and Charles Eyries (in Paris, 1957)
• Eyries implants Djourno's induction coils in two patients
• Alternating current transmitted to the coil produces perception of sound
• Early Developments in the Western Hemisphere
– William House, John Doyle, James Doyle (Los Angeles, 1960)
• Effect electrical stimulation during stapes surgery
• Implant 3 patients with a single gold electrode – Blair Simmons (Stanford University, 1964)
• Develops a six-electrode system using a percutaneous plug ( Ineraid) – Robert Michelson (San Francisco, 1970)
• Implant 3 patients using a gold two-electrode system ( Advanced Bionics) – William House (Los Angeles, 1972)
• First wearable cochlear implant device using a centering coil and magnet
• House/3M single channel cochlear implant (approved by the FDA in 1984)
Djourno (Physiologist)
Eyries (ENT surgeon)
William House (ENT Surgeon)
House/3M single channel device
10
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
History of the Cochlear Implant
• Development of a Mutichannel Device (1970-80s)
– Single channel device Very Poor speech understanding – Competition
• Michelson, Merzenich, Robert Schindler (UCSF) Advanced Bionics Corp.
• Hochmair (Vienna, Austria) Med-El GmbH.
• Graeme Clark (The University of Melbourne in Australia)
– Research supported by public donation (commenced 1967)
– First Multichannel Cochlear Implant Patient (1978) Cochlear Ltd.
• FDA Approved Multichannel CI Manufacturers
– Cochlear (Australia) – 1985
– Advanced Bionics (Austria) – 1996
– Med-El (Austria) – 2001 (1994 – European release)
• Lasker~DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award (2013)
– Graeme M. Clark, Ingeborg Hochmair and Blake S. Wilson
• For the development of the modern cochlear implant
- a device that bestows hearing to individuals with profound deafness.
Rod Saunders (First multi- channel CI patient) and
Graeme Clark
11
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Product History
12
1978 (by Michelson)
A.A.Eshraghi (The Anatomical Record, 2012)
1973 (by House, single channel)
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Product History
13
1985 (Cochlear Ltd. Nucleus, FDA approval, multi-channel)
www.cochlear.com
1989 (Cochlear Ltd.
Mini speech processor)
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Product History
14
1997 (Cochlear Ltd. Sprint, Digital signal processor (DSP))
www.cochlear.com
2002 (Cochlear Ltd. Nucleus®
24 Contour Advance™, design for structure preservation)
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Product History
15
www.cochlear.com
2008 (Cochlear Ltd. Hybrid,
hearing aid + cochlear implant) 2009 (Cochlear Ltd. Nucleus 5)
2015 (Cochlear Ltd. Nucleus 6, smart speech processor)
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Two Recent Advances
16
• Bilateral electrical stimulation
• Combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) for patients with residual, low-frequency hearing
http://www.otosurgery.org/
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 17
http://www.otosurgery.org/
Results with bilateral
implants using independent processors, Müller et al., 2002
Sentences, Noise Right
right both left
Percent Correct
0 20 40 60 80 100
Sentences, Noise Left
right both left
Monosyllabic Words, No Noise
right both left
32 86 96 107 118 148 151 257 298 Subjects
right both left
Percent Correct
0 20 40 60 80 100
Implant(s)
right both left right both left
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 18
http://www.otosurgery.org/
Combined Electric Acoustic Stimulation(EAS)
■ Combined EAS: Hearing Aid (HA) + Cochlear Implant (CI) on same ear
■ Many implant candidates Good low-frequency hearing but poor high frequency hearing
■ Low-frequency Acoustic Hearing using a HA High-frequency Electrical Hearing using a CI
■ Good speech perception in noisy environments
■ Latest EAS technique
- Surgery: the round window approach (conventional method: cochleostomy) - Electrode: flex, Short & thin electrode (half insertion)
Hybrid CI Device (HA+CI) Ski-slope type
SNHL
Sentence discrimination tests for a EAS patient
In quiet SNR 15 dB SNR 10 dB
W. Gstoettner et al. (Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 2004) Hearing Aid
(HA)
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Performance of Cochlear Implant
19
B. S. Wilson and M. F. Dorman (IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2007)
Test
Star patient’s score
B. S. Wilson & M. Dorman (Hearing Research, 2008)
Percent correct scores for 55 CI users
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 20
Cochlear Implant Manufacturers
■ Big 3 companies
- Cochlear, Australia - Med-El, Austria
- Advanced Bionics, USA
■ Others
- Oticon(Former Neurelec), France - Nurotron, China
- Todoc, S. Korea
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 21
Cochlear Ltd.
■ Nucleus series - Market leader
■ Dual microphones - Directionality
■ Wireless control
- Interaction with TV and smartphone
■ Colorful designs - Users satisfaction
■ Water-resistance - Living convenience
■ Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) - High-performance
■ Data logging - Rehabilitation
www.cochlear.com
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 22
Cochlear Ltd.
■ Thinnest cochlear implant among 3 major manufacturers
■ Advanced off stylet electrode array - Perimodiolar electrode array
- Near zero insertion force
www.cochlear.com
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 23
Cochlear Ltd.
■ Smart speech processor (SmartSoundiQ)
- Integrated hybrid mode - Wireless connectivity
- Data logging and analysis: information for next fitting - Speech in noise, wind, quiet, and music modes
- Dual microphones
- Wind noise reduction (WNR)
www.cochlear.com
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 24
Med-El
■ Synchrony series
- Freely rotating and self- aligning magnet
■ EAS
■ Water-resistance
■ Color options
■ Test in rainy environment
■ Wind noise reduction
■ 3.0 T MRI (with magnet) - Other groups 1.5 T MRI
www.medel.com
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 25
Med-El
www.medel.com
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 26
Med-El
www.medel.com
■ Various types of electrode array - Long electrode: for stimulation full cochlea
- Short electrode: for EAS
■ Structure preservation - Atraumatic insertion - Reimplantation
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 27
Advanced Bionics
www.advancedbionics.com
■ Water-resistance
■ Wireless control
■ Colorful design
■ Dual microphones
■ Acquired by Sonova in 2009/ Co-working with
Phonak (hearing aid company)
■ EAS – FDA approval in Aug.
2015
Neural Prosthetic Engineering 28
Advanced Bionics
www.advancedbionics.com
■ HiFocus mid-scala electrode array
- Pre-curved electrode
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
New Technologies
29
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Next Version of Cochlear Implant?
30
www.cochlear.com
www.cochlear.com
Candidates
1. Silicon-based CI
2. Polymer- based CI 3. Optical
stimulation
…
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Silicon-Based Device
31
• Advantages of silicon-based neural implant – Batch process
• High-yield
• Mass production – MEMS technology
• Miniaturization
• High-density
• Highly functional device
• Integration
• Disadvantages of silicon-based neural implants – Brittleness
– Stiffness
– Long-term reliability
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Silicon-Based Device
J.Wang and K.D.Wise, J.MEMS 2009. 32
J.Wang and K.D.Wise, J.MEMS 2008.
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Polymer-Based Neural Implant
33
• Conventional neural implants – Titanium package
• Highly hermetic
• MR image artifact problem
– Wire-based electrode array
• Manual fabrication, limited integration density of contacts
• Polymer-based neural implants – Thin & compact
– Simpler manufacturing process
• MEMS technology – No MR image artifact
– Relatively low hermeticity than metals
10 mm
S. K. An et al., IEEE-TBME 2007.
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP)
34
• Two widely used polymers – Polyimide, parylene-C
• Relatively high water absorption rate
• Lack of long-term reliable
• Liquid Crystal Polymer:
A New Biomaterial for Implantable Devices
– Biocompatible
– Chemically inert and mechanically stable – Flexible
– Compatible with MEMS technologies – RF transparent
– Very Low water absorption rate (<0.04%) – Fusion-bondable
– Deformable
LCP[1]
(Vecstar)
Polyimide [2]
(PI2525)
Parylene-C[3]
(GALXYL)
Melting Temp. (°C) 280~335 >400 290
Tensile Strength
(MPa) 270~500 128 69
Young’s Modulus
(GPa) 2~10 2.4 3.2
Water absorption
(%) < 0.04 2.8 0.06 ~ 0.6
Dielectric Constant
(@1MHz) 2.9 3.3 2.95
[1] Kuraray group, http://www.kuraray.co.jp/en/
[2] HDMicroSystems, http://hdmicrosystems.com/HDMicroSystems/en_US/
[3] V&P Scientific, Inc., http://vp-scientific.com/parylene_properties.htm
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
LCP-Based Cochlear Implant
35
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Electronics Design
36
• Simplified circuit block diagram
Contact pad side Coil side
Fabricated electronic board for cochlear implant
[1] S. K. An et al., IEEE TBME 2007.
Current stimulator chip
0.8 μm high voltage CMOS process (AMS)
CIS strategy
16 ch. mono- & 15 ch. bi-polar stimulation
Stimulation rate : 1,000 pps/channel
Duration : 0 μs ~ 56 μs (7 levels, 8 μs step)
Amplitude : 0 μA ~ 1.8 mA
(255 levels, 7.3 μA step )
[2] J. Jeong et al., Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011.
• Fabricated on Copper clad LCP film – Planar type receiving coil integration
for low-cost & miniaturized cochlear implant
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
• LCP-based Cochlear Implant System
Small & Light Package
37
[1] S. K. An et al., IEEE-TBME 2007.
Parameter Value
Carrier Frequency 2.5 MHz Operating Distance 12 mm
Current Amplitude 8 μA~1.8 mA Pulse Duration* 0~56 μs
Pulse Rate* Total 8,000 Hz
Parameter *LCP-based CI Titanium-based CI[1]
Package Size 20 x 28 mm2 65.7 x 33.3 mm2 Package
Max. thickness (w/o magnet)
1.2 mm 8.2 mm
Weight
(w/o magnet) 0.45 g 10.4 g
1. Physical Dimension (LCP vs. Ti-based CI)
2. Wireless & Stimulation
* LCP-based cochlear
implant Metal-based
cochlear implant[1]
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Flexible LCP-Based Cochlear Electrode Array
38
• LCP-based cochlear electrode array
– Multi-layered & tapered LCP film structure – Sawtooth-like structure
– Silicone elastomer encapsulation
• Minimal insertion force
• Atraumatic insertion
Cross Section of
16-Channel Interconnection
`
`
`
` 300
350255075
750
575
LCP Substrate First LCP Cover
Second LCP Cover
Multi-layered Lead Wires Via Unit: μm
[1] K. S. Min et al., Otology & Neurotology 2014.
[2] T.M. Gwon et al., Biomedical Microdevices 2015.
Sites E-Gun Deposited/
Electroplated
Blind Via
Side Via Opening
Lead Wires
38
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Evaluation – Human Temporal Bone Insertion Study
39
• Safety validation of the electrode
– Human temporal bone insertion test – Insertion depth measurement from CT
scan image of the temporal bone
• No trauma at basal turn
• Dislocation into scala vestibule at middle turn in 630°insertion trial
• Max. insertion depth: ~630°
Cochlear electrode
[1] T.M. Gwon et al., Biomedical Microdevices 2015.
CT scan images (▲ )and cross-section (▼) of the temporal bones
(round window approach:
insertion depth ~ 630°)
CT scan images (▲ )and cross-section (▼) of the temporal bones
(cochleostomy approach:
insertion depth ~ 500°)
SV: Scala vestibuli ST: Scala tympani
SV
SV SV
ST ST
ST
ST
ST ST
SV
SV SV
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
MRI Compatibility and In Vivo Functionality Testing
40
•
Results of the 3.0 T MRI experiments – Metal-based CI: Severe MR image artifact– LCP-based CI: Little MR image artifact
50 mm
Axial Coronal
* *
3.0 T MR images of the head
[1] J. H. Kim et al., Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2010.
• LCP-based Cochlear Implant
– EABR measurement
0 2 4 6 8
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Voltage (V)
Time (ms) Measured eABR
Wave V
Stimulus artifact Package
Electrodes
Stimulation:
800 μA, 32 μs (EABR: electrically evoked auditory
brainstem response)
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Long-Term Reliability of LCP
41
• Accelerate Soak Test in 75℃ Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) Solution
• Multi-Interdigitated Electrode (IDE) array
• Long-term leakage current measurements of polyimide, parylene-C, and LCP.
[1] SW Lee et al., IEEE-TBME 2011
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
Polyimide
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
Parylene-C
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 10-13
10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
LCP
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
Mean time to failure
> 1 year (380 days)
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
Polyimide
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
Parylene-C
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 10-13
10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
LCP
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
Polyimide
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
Parylene-C
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 10-13
10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2
Soak Time (days)
Current (A)
LCP
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4 Ch5 Ch6
Mean time to failure : 75 days
Mean time to failure : 115 days
Polyimide Parylene-C LCP
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Optical Stimulation
42
• Introducing Optics in cochlear implantation
• Multichannel Optical Cochlear Implantation – Highly local stimulation
– Fine frequency resolution
– Increasing the number of effective channels
– Limited by line-of-sight property of light, and added complexity in optical instrumentation
Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: effects of acute and chronic deafening.
Richter CP, Bayon R, Izzo AD, Otting M, Suh E, Goyal S, Hotaling J, Walsh JT Hearing research 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):42-51
http://openoptogeneticsblog.org/?p=682
Neural Prosthetic Engineering
Reference
• J. Jeong et al., Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011.
• S. K. An et al., IEEE-TBME 2007.
• T.M. Gwon et al., Biomedical Microdevices 2015.
• K. S. Min et al., Otology & Neurotology 2014.
• A.A.Eshraghi (The Anatomical Record, 2012)
• B. S. Wilson & M. Dorman (Hearing Research, 2008)
• Ducci et al., Otology & Neurotology, 2010
• J.Wang and K.D.Wise, J.MEMS 2008.
• C.-P. Richter et al., Hearing Research, 2008
• L.E.Moreno et al., Hearing Research 2011.
• M. Jeschcke et al., Hearing Research 2015.
43