Lecture
Lecture 4. 4.
Thermodynamics Thermodynamics
[Ch. 2]
[Ch. 2]
[Ch. 2]
[Ch. 2]
• Energy, Entropy, and Availability Balances
• Phase Equilibria
- Fugacities and activity coefficients - K-values
• Nonideal Thermodynamic Property Models
- P-v-T equation-of-state models - Activity coefficient models
• Selecting an Appropriate Model
Thermodynamic Properties Thermodynamic Properties
• Importance of thermodynamic properties and p y p p equations in separation operations
– Energy requirements (heat and work) Energy requirements (heat and work) – Phase equilibria : Separation limit
– Equipment sizing Equipment sizing
• Property estimation
– Specific volume, enthalpy, entropy, availability, fugacity, activity, etc.
– Used for design calculations
Separator size and layout
A ili Pi i l
Auxiliary components : Piping, pumps, valves, etc.
Energy
Energy, Entropy and Availability , Entropy and Availability Balances
Balances Balances Balances
s in T Q ,
Heat transfer in and out
s out T
Q , O f d
s
Q ,in
… …
s
Q ,out
One or more feed streams flowing into the system are separated into two or more
d t t th t fl
v b s h P T z
n, i, , , , , ,
:
Streams in product streams that flow
out of the system.
Separation process (system) :
:
: : :
n Molar flow rate
b h P T (system)
: :
Streams out LW
Sirr,
z Mole fraction
T Temperature P Pressure
v b s h P T z
n, i, , , , , ,
(Surroundings)
P Pressure
h Molar enthalpy s Molar entropy
… …
Shaft work in and out
out
W )s in (
W )s 0 (
T b Molar availability
v Specific volume
Energy
Energy Balance Balance
• Continuous and steady-state flow system Continuous and steady state flow system
• Kinetic, potential, and surface energy changes are neglected
neglected
• First law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy)
(stream enthalpy flows + heat transfer + shaft work)leaving system
( t th l fl + h t t f + h ft k)
- (stream enthalpy flows + heat transfer + shaft work)entering system
= 0
t f i t
( nh Q W
s) ( nh Q W
s) 0
out of in to
system system
Entropy
Entropy Balance Balance
• The first law provides no information on energy efficiency
• Second law of thermodynamics
(stream entropy flows + entropy flows by heat transfer)leaving system
- (stream entropy flows + entropy flows by heat transfer )entering system
= production of entropy by the process
out of in to
system system
irr
s s
Q Q
ns ns S
T T
system system
- Production of entropy
- Irreversible increase in the entropy of the universe
- Quantitative measure of the thermodynamic inefficiency of a process
Availability (
Availability (Exergy Exergy) ) Balance Balance
• The entropy balance contains no terms related to shaft work
Th t i diffi lt t l t ith ti
• The entropy is difficult to relate with power consumption
• Availability (exergy) : Available energy for complete conversion to shaft work
s T h
b
0to shaft work
• Stream availability function :
a measure of the maximum amount of stream energy that can be (Entropy balance) T0 - (Energy balance)
a measure of the maximum amount of stream energy that can be
converted into shaft work if the stream is taken to the reference state
0 0
1 1
nb Q T T Ws nb Q T T Ws LW
LW
in to out of
system
T
s
system T
s
(stream availability flows + availability of heat + shaft work)entering systementering system
- (stream availability flows + availability of heat + shaft work)leaving system
= loss of availability (lost work)
Lost Work, Minimum Work,
Lost Work, Minimum Work, and and Second Law Efficiency
Second Law Efficiency Second Law Efficiency Second Law Efficiency
• Lost work, LW T S
0 irr- The greater its value, the greater is the energy inefficiency
- Its magnitude depends on the extent of process irreversibilities
• Minimum work of separation W
- Reversible process : LW = 0
• Minimum work of separation, W
min– Minimum shaft work required to conduct the separation – Equivalent to the difference Equivalent to the difference
in the heat transfer and shaft work
minout of in to
system system
W nb nb
system system
) separation of
work (minimum
W
• The second-law efficiency
) separation of
work actual
t (equivalen
) separation of
work (minimum
min
min
W LW
W
Phase
Phase Equilibria Equilibria
• The phase equilibria of the given system provide possible equilibrium compositions (separation limit)
equilibrium compositions (separation limit)
• Equilibrium : Gibbs free energy for all phases is a minimum
( )
G G T P N N( , , 1, 2,...,NC) G G T P N N N
i i
dG SdT VdP dN
components
( ) ( )
p psystem i i
dG dN
(at constant T & P)
N i pi
dN
dN
(1) ( ),
system i i
phases components P T
(conservation of moles of each species, no reaction)
p ii
dN
dN
2
) ( )
2 ( )
1
( i
....
i Ni
( p , )
The chemical potential of a particular species in a multicomponent system is identical in all phases at physical equilibrium.
Fugacities
Fugacities and Activity Coefficients and Activity Coefficients
• Chemical potential
Units of energy
• More convenient quantities
– Units of energy
– Not easy to understand physical meaning
q
– Fugacity : pseudo-pressure
– Equality of chemical potentials equality of fugacities )
/
exp( RT
C
fi
i– Fugacity coefficient
Ratio of fugacity and pressure
P fi
i /
i f y Pi / i Reference : ideal gas – Activity
Ratio of fugacities
/ i0 i
i f f
a
At equilibrium,
(1) (2) (N)
i i i
f f f
Ratio of fugacities
Reference : ideal solution
– Activity coefficients
i ai / xi fi / x fi i0T
(1) T
(2) T
(N)(1) (2) (N)
i i i
a a a
Ratio of activity and composition
Departure from ideal solution behavior
i i i fi i fi
T T T
(1) (2) (N)
P P P
K
K- -Values Values
• Phase equilibrium ratio : ratio of mole fractions of a species present in two phases at equilibrium
• K-value (vapor-liquid equilibrium ratio; K-factor)
i i
/
iK y x
: for the vapor-liquid case
• Distribution coefficient (liquid-liquid equilibrium ratio) : for the liquid-liquid case
(1) (2)
Di i
/
iK x x
• Relative volatility Relative volatility : for the for the vapor liquid vapor-liquid case case
ij
K
i/ K
j
• Relative selectivity : for the liquid liquid case
ij
K
Di/ K
Dj
• Relative selectivity : for the liquid-liquid case
Phase Equilibrium Calculations (VLE) Phase Equilibrium Calculations (VLE)
iV iL
f f
For vapor-liquid equilibrium• Ideal gas + Ideal solution
t
iV iL
f f
For vapor liquid equilibriumsat i i
i
P x P
y
P P x
K y
sat i i
i
i
• Phi-Phi approach : equation-of-state form of K-value
P x P
y
i iL iiV
iV iL
K
i
o o
f
• Gamma-Phi approach : activity coefficient form of K-value
o iV
y P
i iLx f
i iL
iL iL iL iLi
iV iV
K f
P
Nonideal
Nonideal Thermodynamic Thermodynamic Property Models
Property Models Property Models Property Models
• No universal equations are available for computing, for
nonideal mixtures, values of thermodynamic properties such as density, enthalpy, entropy, fugacities, and activity
ffi i t f ti f T P d h iti
coefficients as functions of T, P, and phase composition.
⇒ (1) P-v-T equation-of-state models ( )
• P-v-T equation-of-state models
(2) Activity coefficient or free-energy models q
Nonideality is due to (1) the volume occupied by the molecules and (2) intermolecular forces among the molecules
e.g. the van der Waals equation
RT a
2
RT a P v b v
Useful Equations of State Useful Equations of State
• Mixing rules
C
C 0.5
C1 1
( )
C C
i j i j
i j
a y y a a
1C
i i i
b y b
Models for
Models for Activity Coefficients Activity Coefficients
) ,....,
, ,
(
1 2 Ci
i
T x x x
Notes on
Notes on Using Using Phase Equilibrium Phase Equilibrium Models
Models Models Models
• Low pressure VLE
Gamma Phi approach recommended – Gamma-Phi approach recommended
– Poynting correction (modified Raoult’s law) required for medium pressure – Cannot be applied when T or P condition exceeds critical T, P
• High pressure VLE
– Phi-Phi approach recommended
– Special care should be taken for polar components (alcohols waterSpecial care should be taken for polar components (alcohols, water, acids, amines, etc.)
• Check binary interaction parameters matrix
If parameters exist use them – If parameters exist, use them – If parameters do not exist,
Try to obtain by regression of experimental data
U t ib ti th d ( UNIFAC)
Use group contribution method (e.g. UNIFAC)
• Special applications Specialized models required
– Polymer solutionPolymer solution – Electrolyte solution
– Biomolecular applications
Selecting an Appropriate Model Selecting an Appropriate Model
(LG): light gases (HC): hydrocarbons
(PC): polar organic compounds (A): aqueous solutions (PC): polar organic compounds (A): aqueous solutions (E): electrolytes
• If the mixture is (A) with no (PC)
• If the mixture is (A) with no (PC)
- If (E) are present modified NRTL equation - If (E) are not present a special model
• If the mixture contains (HC), covering a wide boiling rage
The corresponding-states method of Lee-Kesler-Plöcker
If h b ili f i f (HC) i id
• If the boiling range of a mixture of (HC) is not wide
- For all T and P the P-R equation
- For all P and noncryogenic T the S-R-K equation
• If the mixture contains (PC)
- For all T, but not P in the critical region the Benedict-Webb- Rubin-Starling method
• If the mixture contains (PC)
- If (LG) are present the PSRK method
- If (LG) are not present a suitable liquid-phase method