• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

VI. Discussions

4. Limitation and future research

This study could not execute SEM, linear regression nor PLS analysis due to its small sample size. However, despite its small sample, constructs are showing relationship between IT governance determinants variable to various IT decision areas and also relationship between IT governance and organizational cultural factors for innovation. In the future, if larger sample is available, SEM, linear regression or PLS method can be applied with same research framework.

The singularities are observed during the analysis. This can be future study subject. Exploitation showed opposite direction in the result. The direction can be changes as sample size grows, however, if it is not even when the sample size increases, further analysis on this topic can be a good subject for future study.

A longitudinal study for causal relationship between IT governance and organizational culture for innovation capability can also be a future study subject. In the literature review on this study suggests that there is no generally accepted causal relationship between organizational culture and IT governance.

Examining the causal relationship through the longitudinal studies could expand the evidence for the relationship.

A further study on relationship between information characteristics and IT architecture or business application needs can be another good study subject. Information can be

characterized by many aspects such as tacit-nature of information. Since, information intensity affects IT architecture and business application needs, one may assume that characteristics of information that organization process can also influences IT governance arrangement.

References

Ahituv, N., Neumann, S. & Zviran, M., 1989. Factors affecting the policy for distributing computing resources. MIS quarterly, 389-401.

Allen, B.R. & Boynton, A.C., 1991. Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility. MIS quarterly, 15, 435-445.

Alshawi, S., Irani, Z. & Baldwin, L., 2003. Benchmarking information technology investment and benefits extraction. Benchmarking:

An International Journal, 10, 414-423.

Bassellier, G. & Benbasat, I., 2004. Business competence of information technology professionals: conceptual development and influence on IT-business partnerships. MIS quarterly, 28, 673-694.

Boynton, A.C., Jacobs, G.C. & Zmud, R.W., 1992. Whose responsibility is IT management. Sloan Management Review, 33, 32-38.

Boynton, A.C. & Zmud, R.W., 1987. Information technology planning in the 1990's: Directions for practice and research. MIS quarterly, 11, 59-71.

Brown, A.E. & Grant, G.G., 2005. Framing the frameworks: A review of IT governance research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 15, 2005), 696, 712.

Brown, C.V., 1997. Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Information Systems Research, 8, 69-94.

Brown, C.V. & Magill, S.L., 1994. Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: toward a model of antecedents. Management information systems quarterly, 18, 371-371.

Brown, C.V. & Magill, S.L., 1998. Reconceptualizing the context-design issue for the information systems function. Organization science, 9, 176-194.

Burlingame, J.F., Thurston, P.H. & Culliton, J.W., 1967. Information technology and decentralization: Harvard College.

Burton, R.M., Obel, B., Hunter, S., Søndergaard, M. & Døjbak, D., 1998.

Strategic organizational diagnosis and design: Developing theory for application: Kluwer Academic Pub.

Carpenter, M.A. & Westphal, J.D., Year. A network perspective on how outside directors impact strategic decision makinged.^eds.

Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings.

Cash, E., Yoong, P. & Huff, S., 2004. The impact of e-commerce on the role of IS professionals. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35, 50-63.

Chanopas, A. & Krairit, D., 2006. Managing information technology infrastructure: a new flexibility framework. Management Research News, 29, 632-651.

Clark Jr, T.D., 1992. Corporate systems management: an overview and research perspective. Communications of the ACM, 35, 61-75.

Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.

Cross, J., Earl, M.J. & Sampler, J.L., 1997. Transformation of the IT function at British Petroleum. MIS quarterly, 401-423.

Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 555-590.

Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L., 1997. Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment: Oxford University Press, USA.

Deshpandé, R., Farley, J.U. & Webster Jr, F.E., 1993. Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. The Journal of Marketing, 23-37.

Dewar, R.D. & Dutton, J.E., 1986. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis. Management Science, 32, 1422-1433.

Dixon, P.J. & John, D.A., 1989. Technology issues facing corporate management in the 1990s. MIS quarterly, 13, 247-255.

Ein-Dor, P. & Segev, E., 1978. Organizational context and the success of management information systems. Management Science, 24, 1064-1077.

Ein-Dor, P. & Segev, E., 1982. Organizational context and MIS structure: Some empirical evidence. MIS quarterly, 55-68.

Gartner, Gartner dictionary [online]. Gartner. Available from:

http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/it-governance/ [Accessed Access Date 2012].

Glazer, R. & Weiss, A.M., 1993. Marketing in turbulent environments:

decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information.

Journal of Marketing Research, 509-521.

Golub, H., 1975. Organizing information system resources:

Centralization vs. decentralization. The Information Systems Handbook, Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones Irwin, 65-91.

Henderson, J.C. & Venkatraman, N., 1993. Strategic alignment:

Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM systems journal, 32, 4-16.

Huang, S.-M., Ou, C.-S., Chen, C.-M. & Lin, B., 2006. An empirical study of relationship between IT investment and firm performance: A resource-based perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 173, 984-999.

Huber, N., 2004. IT looks the weak link in compliance. Computer Weekly, 27.

Hurley, R.F., 1995. Group culture and its effect on innovative productivity. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, 57-75.

Hurley, R.F. & Hult, G.T.M., 1998. Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical

Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42-54.

Itgi, 2001. Board briefing on IT Governance.

Jaworski, B.J. & Kohli, A.K., 1993. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. The Journal of Marketing, 53-70.

Jelinek, M., 1977. Technology, organizations, and contingency.

Academy of management review, 17-26.

Jenkins, J. & Santos, R., 1982. Centralization vs. decentralization of data processing functions. The Economics of Information Processing, 2.

Kanter, R.M., 1983. The change masters: innovation for productivity in American corporations. New York, Simon & Schuser.

Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P., 2004. The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets. Strategy & Leadership, 32, 10-17.

Katz, R. & Tushman, M., 1981. An investigation into the managerial roles and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisors in a major R & D facility. R&D Management, 11, 103-110.

Kayworth, T. & Sambamurthy, V., 2000. Managing the information technology infrastructure. Baylor Business Review, 18, 13-15.

Keen, P.G.W., 1981. Communications in the 21st century:

Telecommunications and business policy. Organizational Dynamics, 10, 54-67.

King, J.L., 1983. Centralized versus decentralized computing:

organizational considerations and management options. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 15, 319-349.

King, N. & Anderson, N., 1990. Innovation in working groups.

Kumar, R.L., 2004. A framework for assessing the business value of information technology infrastructures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 11-32.

Lane, P.J., Salk, J.E. & Lyles, M.A., 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic management journal, 22, 1139-1161.

Lee, D.M.S., Trauth, E.M. & Farwell, D., 1995. Critical skills and knowledge requirements of IS professionals: a joint academic/industry investigation. MIS quarterly, 313-340.

Leitheiser, R.L., 1992. MIS skills for the 1990s: a survey of MIS managers' perceptions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 69-91. performance: Proposing and testing a model. Organization science, 4, 209-225.

Marcus, A.A. & Anderson, M.H., 2006. A General Dynamic Capability:

Does it Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the

Retail Food Industry?*. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 19-46.

Marquis, D.G., 1969. The anatomy of successful innovations. Innovation, 1, 28-37.

Mcginnis, M.A. & Ackelsberg, M.R., 1983. Effective innovation management: Missing link in strategic planning? Journal of Business Strategy, 4, 59-66.

Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Meyer, A.D. & Coleman Jr, H.J., 1978.

Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of management review, 546-562.

Nelson, K.M. & Cooprider, J.G., 1996. The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. Management information systems quarterly, 20, 409-432.

Nelson, R.R. & Winter, S.G., 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change: Belknap press.

Oecd, 2004. Principles of Corporate Governance.

Olson, E.M., Slater, S.F. & Hult, G.T.M., 2005. The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 49-65.

Olson, M.H. & Chervany, N.L., 1980. The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services Function. MIS quarterly, 4, 56-69.

Pelham, A.M. & Wilson, D.T., 1995. A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance.

Journal of the academy of marketing science, 24, 27-43.

Peterson, R.R., Year. Configurations and coordination for global information governance: Complex designs in a transnational European contexted.^eds. 34th HICSS Conference, Hawaii.

Peterson, R.R., 2004. Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance. In W.V. Grembergen (ed.) Strategies for Information Technology Governance. IDEA GROUP PUBLISHING, 37-80.

Porter, M.E., 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy. Strategic Planning: Readings, 102-117.

Porter, M.E. & Millar, V.E., 1985. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, Reprint Service.

Potter, K., Smith, M., Guevara, J.K., Hall, L. & Stegman, E., 2011. IT Metrics: IT Spending and Staffing Report, 2011: Gartner.

Rockart, J.F., 1987. The line takes the leadership.

Rockart, J.F., Bullen, C.V. & Kogan, J.N., 1978. The management of distributed processing: Center for Informations Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology.

Sambamurthy, V. & Zmud, R.W., 1999. Arrangements for information

technology governance: a theory of multiple contingencies. MIS quarterly, 261-290.

Schwarz, A. & Hirschheim, R., 2003. An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: managing perceptions and activities of IT. The journal of strategic information systems, 12, 129-166.

Senge, P.M., 2004. The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning Organizations. How Organizations Learn: Managing the Search for Knowledge, 462-486.

Starre, D. & Jong, B., 1998. IT governance and management. Nolan Norton Institute research memorandum.

Stokes Jr, S.L., 1991. The New IS Manager for the 1990s. Information System Management, 8, 44-50.

Tavakolian, H., 1989. Linking the Information Technology Structure With Organizational Competitive strategy: A Survey". MIS quarterly, 13, 308-318.

Thompson, J.D. & Bates, F.L., 1957. Technology, organization, and administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 325-343.

Thompson, V.A., 1965. Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1-20.

Todd, P.A., Mckeen, J.D. & Gallupe, R.B., 1995. The evolution of IS job skills: A content analysis of IS job advertisements from 1970-1990. Management information systems quarterly, 19, 1-1.

Trites, G., 2004. Director responsibility for IT governance.

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5, 89-99.

Van De Ven, A.H., 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.

Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S. & Guldentops, E., 2004. Structures, processes and relational mechanisms for IT governance.

Strategies for information technology governance. 1-36.

Venkatraman, N., 1997. Beyond outsourcing: managing IT resources as a value center. Sloan Management Review, 38, 51-64.

Von Simson, E., 1995. The recentralization of IT. Computerworld, 29, 1-5.

Weill, P., 2004. Don't just lead, govern: How top-performing firms govern IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3, 1-17.

Weill, P. & Broadbent, M., 1998. Leveraging the new infrastructure:

how market leaders capitalize on information technology:

Harvard Business Press.

Wetherbe, J., 1988. The MIS Conundrum—Centralization or Decentralization. Chief Financial Officer USA.

Wheelock, A.R., 1982. Service Center or Profit Center? Datamation, 28, 167-176.

Wiersema, M.F. & Bantel, K.A., 2006. Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment.

Strategic management journal, 14, 485-504.

Winter, S., 1998. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The strategic management of intellectual capital, 165-187.

Zmud, R.W., 1983. Information systems in organizations: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

Zmud, R.W., Boynton, A.C. & Jacobs, G.C., 1986. The information economy: A new perspective for effective information systems management. ACM SIGMIS Database, 18, 17-23.