CONCLUSION - Statistical Analysis - Visit-to-Visit Systolic Blood Pressure Variability in Patie

E. Statistical Analysis

V. CONCLUSION

In this study, visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability was associated with increased rates of adverse clinical outcomes in patients after STEMI with PCI.

Thus, careful assessment of BP and attempts to reduce BPV might also be important for STEMI.

REFERENCES

[1] Lawes CM, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A; International Society of Hypertension.

Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet. 2008;371:1513–

1518.

[2] Warlow C, Sudlow C, Dennis M, Wardlaw J, Sandercock P. Stroke. Lancet.

2003;362:1211–1224.

[3] Gianfranco Parati, Juan E. Ochoa, Carolina Lombardi, Grzegorz Bilo.

Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2013;10:143-155.

[4] Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O’Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375:895–905.

[5] Paolo Verdecchia, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Fabio Angeli, Bruno Trimarco, Giuseppe Mancia, Janice Pogue, Peggy Gao, Peter Sleight, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf. Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes in Relation with Myocardial Infarction and Stroke in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Hypertension. 2015;65:108-114.

[6] Paul Muntner, Jeff Whittle, Amy I. Lynch, Lisandro D. Colantonio, Lara M.

Simpson, Paula T. Einhorn, Emily B. Levitan, Paul K. Whelton, William C.

Cushman, Gail T. Louis, Barry R. Davis, Suzanne Oparil. Visit-to-Visit Variability of Blood Pressure and Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, Heart Failure, and Mortality: A Cohort Study. Annals of Internal medicine. 2015;163:329-338.

[7] Hata Y, Muratani H, Kimura Y, Fukiyama K, Kawano Y, Ashida T, Yokouchi M, Imai Y, Ozawa T, Fujii J, Omae T. Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients receiving antihypertensive therapy.

Journal of Human Hypertension. 2002;16:141–146.

[8] Grove JS, Reed DM, Yano K, Hwang LJ. Variability in systolic blood

pressure—a risk factor for coronary heart disease? American Journal of Epidemiology. 1997;145:771–776.

[9] Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasché P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Circulation. 2012;126:2020–2035.

[10] Jain S, Ting HT, Bell M, Bjerke CM, Lennon RJ, Gersh BJ, Rihal CS, Prasad A. Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology. 2011;107:1111–1116.

[11] El Assad M, Topouchian J, Le Dudal K, Labaki G, Asmar R. Validation of the OMRON MR-I blood pressure device according to the international validation protocol. Journal of Hypertension. 2003;21(suppl. 4):S23.

[12] Hata Y, Kimura Y, Muratani H, Fukiyama K, Kawano Y, Ashida T, Yokouchi M, Imai Y, Ozawa T, Fujii J, Omae T. Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of brain infarction in elderly hypertensive patients. Hypertension Research. 2000;23:553–560.

[13] Havlik RJ, Foley DJ, Sayer B, Masaki K, White L, Launer LJ. Variability in midlife systolic blood pressure is related to late-life brain white matter lesions: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Stroke. 2002;33:26–30.

[14] Brickman AM, Reitz C, Luchsinger JA, Manly JJ, Schupf N, Muraskin J,

DeCarli C, Brown TR, Mayeux R. Long-term blood pressure fluctuation and cerebrovascular disease in an elderly cohort. Archives of Neurology. 2010;67:564–

569.

[15] Muntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, Reynolds K, Arnett DK, Oparil S. The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension. 2011;57:160–166.

[16] Diaz KM, Veerabhadrappa P, Kashem MA, Feairheller DL, Sturgeon KM, Williamson ST, Crabbe DL, Brown MD. Relationship of visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability to vascular function in African Americans.

Hypertension Research. 2012;35:55–61.

[17] Mancia G, Parati G. The role of blood pressure variability in end-organ damage. Journal of Hypertension Suppl. 2003;21(6):S17–S23.

[18] Okada, H. et al. Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure is correlated with diabetic nephropathy and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Atherosclerosis. 2012;220:155–159.

[19] Nagai M, Hoshide S, Ishikawa J, Shimada K, Kario K. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variations: new independent determinants for carotid artery measures in the elderly at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Journal of American Society of Hypertension. 2011;5:184–192.

[20] Poortvliet RK, Lloyd SM, Ford I, Sattar N, de Craen AJ, Wijsman LW, Mooijaart SP, Westendorp RG, Jukema JW, de Ruijter W, Gussekloo J, Stott DJ.

Biological correlates of blood pressure variability in elderly at high risk of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Hypertension. 2015;28:469–479.

[21] Shimbo D, Shea S, McClelland RL, Viera AJ, Mann D, Newman J, Lima J, Polak JF, Psaty BM, Muntner P. Associations of aortic distensibility and arterial elasticity with long-term visit-to-visit blood pressure variability: the Multi-Ethnic

Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). American Journal of Hypertension.

2013;26:896–902.

[22] Masahiro Kikuya, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Hirohito Metoki, Kei Asayama, Azusa Hara, TakuObara, Ryusuke Inoue, Haruhisa Hoshi, Junichiro Hashimoto, Kazuhito Totsune, Hiroshi Satoh, Yutaka Imai. Day-by-Day Variability of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate at Home as a Novel Predictor of Prognosis: The Ohasama Study.

Hypertension. 2008;52:1045-1050.

[23] Chenkai Wu, Michael G. Shlipak, Robert S. Stawski, Carmen A. Peralta, Bruce M. Psaty, Tamara B. Harris, Suzanne Satterfield, Eric J. Shiroma, Anne B. Newman, Michelle C. Odden. Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. American Journal of Hypertension. 2017;30(2):151-158.

[24] Kouki Gondo, Shin-ichiro Miura, Yasunori Suematsu, Yuhei Shiga, Takashi Kuwano, Makoto Sugihara, Amane Ike, Atsushi Iwata, Kota Motozato, Takaaki Kusumoto, Hiroaki Nishikawa, Keijiro Saku. Association Between Visit-to-Visit Variability in Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal of Clinical Medical Research 2015;7(7):545-550.

[25] Astrid M. Suchy-Dicey, Erin R. Wallace, Mitchell S.V. Elkind, Maria Aguilar, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Kenneth Rice, Richard Kronmal, Bruce M. Psaty, W.

T. Longstreth Jr. Blood Pressure Variability and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality, Incident Myocardial Infarction, and Incident Stroke in the Cardiovascular Health Study. American Journal of Hypertension. 2013;26(10):1210-1217.

[26] Parati G, Bilo G. Calcium antagonist added to angiotensin receptor blocker: a recipe for reducing blood pressure variability? Evidence from day-by-day home blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2012;59:1091–1093.

[27]Masugata H, Senda S, Murao K, Inukai M, Hosomi N, Iwado Y, Noma T, Kohno M, Himoto T, Goda F. Visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure over a 1-year period is a marker of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in treated

hypertensive patients. Hypertension Research. 2011;34:846–850.

[28] Muller M, Smulders YM, de Leeuw PW, Stehouwer CD. Treatment of hypertension in the oldest old: a critical role for frailty? Hypertension.

2014;63:433–441.

[29] Gianfranco Parati, Helmut Schumacher, Grzegorz Bilo, Giuseppe Mancia.

Evaluating 24-h antihypertensive efficacy by the smoothness index: A meta-analysis of an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database. Journal of Hypertension. 2010;28:2177-2183.

[30] Harikrishna Makani, Sripal Bangalore, Azhar Supariwala, Jorge Romero, Edgar Argulian, Franz H. Messerli. Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. 2014;35:1732–1742.

[31] Yi Zhang, Davide Agnoletti, Michel E. Safar, Jacques Blacher. Effect of Antihypertensive Agents on Blood Pressure Variability: The Natrilix SR Versus Candesartan and Amlodipine in the Reduction of Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients (X-CELLENT) Study. Hypertension. 2011;58:155-160.

연구 결론: 수축기 혈압의 변동성은 ST 분절 상승 심근경색 환자에서 임상적으로 부정 적인 예후와 연관 있다. 세심한 혈압의 평가와 혈압 변동성을 줄이려는 노력이 ST 분 절 상승 심근경색 생존자들에 있어서 중요할 것으로 보인다.

_________________________________________________________________________

핵심어: 혈압 변동성; 심근경색; 예후

문서에서 Visit-to-Visit Systolic Blood Pressure Variability in Patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Predicts Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes (페이지 20-34)