Korea Social Science Data Archive
Korean General Social Survey ,
Pilot Study CODE BOOK
• ID Number A1-2003-0005
• Authoring Entity Jongchun Cha
• Producers Survey Research Center
• Year of Collection 2003
• Distributors .KOSSDA
• Year of Distribution 2004
• Year of Publication .2007
acknowledge the data sources by means of standard bibliographic citations. Citations must appear in footnotes or the reference section of publications.
The bibliographic citation for this data collection is :
SangWook Kim. 2005 "Korean General Social Survey, 2005.”
Producers: Survey Research Center at SungKyunKwan University. Distributors: KOSSDA. year of Distribution: 2006.
Version: v2. A1-2005-0001.
The bibliographic citation for this codebook is :
Korea Social Science Data Archive. 2007. "Korean General Social Survey, 2005 Codebook.” pp. 5-10.
For the codebook of this data collection, all rights are
reserved to KOSSDA. It may not be copied, transmitted,
published or redistributed without permission.
Note: “Not Applicable”=9, 99, 999... “No Response” or “Don't Know”=8, 88, 888...
Social Policies
1. We are faced with many problems in this country. Please indicate whether you think national effort to resolve each of the problems below is too much, about right, or too little.
n
o Question Variable Name
(Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 8
Total Value
Labels too much
about right
too little DK 1) Improving and protecting the
environment
NATENVIR
Govt'l investment for protecting environment
Freq 27 181 558 67 833
% 3.5 23.6 72.8 100.0
2) Improving and protecting the nations
health NATHEAL
Govt'l investment for public health
Freq 19 253 495 66 833
% 2.5 33.0 64.5 100.0
3) Solving the problems of the big cities NATCITY
Govt'l investment for Solving big city problems
Freq 132 153 443 105 833
% 18.1 21.0 60.9 100.0
4) Halting the rising crime rate NATCRIME
Govt'l investment for Reducing crime rate
Freq 93 204 465 71 833
% 12.2 26.8 61.0 100.0
5) Improving the nations educational
system NATEDUC
Govt'l investment for Education
Freq 75 263 455 40 833
% 9.5 33.2 57.4 100.0
6) The military, armaments and defense NATARMS
Govt'l investment for Military, armaments, defense
Freq 198 360 159 116 833
% 27.6 50.2 22.2 100.0
7) Welfare NATFARE
Govt'l investment for Welfare
Freq 29 179 595 30 833
% 3.6 22.3 74.1 100.0
8) Mass transportation NATMASS
Govt'l investment for Mass transportation
Freq 32 333 424 54 833
% 4.1 42.2 53.7 100.0
9) Cultural facilities NATPARK
Govt'l investment for Leisure and cultural facilities
Freq 39 279 458 57 833
% 5.1 36.0 59.0 100.0
10) National unification NATUNIFI
Govt'l investment for National unification
Freq 230 292 196 115 833
% 32.0 40.7 27.3 100.0
11) Aid to rural regions NATFARM
Govt'l investment for Aid to rural regions
Freq 27 126 610 70 833
% 3.5 16.5 79.9 100.0
12) Aid to natural disaster NATADISA
Govt'l investment for Aid to natural disasters
Freq 19 200 550 64 833
% 2.5 26.0 71.5 100.0
13) Assistance for childcare NATCHLD
Govt'l investment for childcare support
Freq 18 175 542 98 833
% 2.4 23.8 73.7 100.0
n
o Question Variable Name (Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels
strongly
agree agree neutral disagree strongly disagree DK
1) Sunshine policy to North Korea SUNSHINE Sunshine Policy
Freq 84 247 183 189 90 40 833
% 10.6 31.1 23.1 23.8 11.3 100.0
2) Separation of dispensary from medical practice
MEDICAR Separation of dispensary
form medical practice
Freq 23 93 200 265 226 26 833
% 2.9 11.5 24.8 32.8 28.0 100.0
3) Equalization of high school education
EQEDUC
Equalization of high school education
Freq 105 244 247 117 47 73 833
% 13.8 32.1 32.5 15.4 6.2 100.0
4) Spanking the students in public schools SPANK
Spanking students in school
Freq 115 325 167 133 74 19 833
% 14.1 39.9 20.5 16.3 9.1 100.0
5) Employee layoff LAYOFF Employee layoff
Freq 22 124 239 280 118 50 833
% 2.8 15.8 30.5 35.8 15.1 100.0
6) Employment of foreign workers
FWORKER Employment of foreign
workers
Freq 72 307 239 129 48 38 833
% 9.1 38.6 30.1 16.2 6.0 100.0
3. What do you think the Korean government needs to do to deal with each of the problems below?
n
o Question Variable Name (Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels much more actively
a little more actively
same as current
a little more passively
much more passively DK 1) Reducing the gap between the rich and poor
EQWLTH Reducing the rich and
poor gap
Freq 435 297 40 25 18 18 833
% 53.4 36.4 4.9 3.1 2.2 100.0
2) Enlarging the opportunity for female employment
FEMAFF Enlarging female
employment
Freq 324 337 102. 43 10 17 833
% 39.7 41.3 12.5 5.3 1.2 100.0
3) Loosening the regulation for private firms
FIRMREG Loosening private firm
regulations
Freq 139 276 170 108 23 117 833
% 19.4 38.5 23.7 15.1 3.2 100.0
4) Intervening in labor disputes LABOR Intervening labor disputes
Freq 180 337 138 80 17 81 833
% 23.9 44.8 18.4 10.6 2.3 100.0
5) Protecting human rights of migrant workers to Korea
FWKERHR Protecting human right of
foreign workers
Freq 319 330 91 32 13 48 833
% 40.6 42.0 11.6 4.1 1.7 100.0
6) Protecting human rights of North Korean defectors
DEFCTHR Protecting human right of
North Korean defectors
Freq 177 277 210 83 32 54 833
% 22.7 35.6 27.0 10.7 4.1 100.0
7) iminating the corruption of public officials
CORRUPT Eliminating corruption of
public officials
Freq 549 194 41 16 14 19 833
% 67.4 23.8 5.0 2.0 1.7 100.0
8) Eliminating the regionalism RGNISM Eliminating the
regionalism
Freq 394 290 81 20 14 34 833
% 49.3 36.3 10.1 2.5 1.8 100.0
9) Maintenance of public orders PUBORD Maintenance of public
orders
Freq 356 315 109 17 4 32 833
% 44.6 39.3 13.6 2.1 0.5 100.0
4. On the whole, how satisfied are you with each of the present state of things in Korea?
n
o Question Variable Name
(Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels very
satisfied satisfied neither satisfied dissatisfiednor
dissatisfied very dissatisfied DK 1) Economic circumstances
SATECON
Sat with Economic Circumstance
Freq 8 69 139 345 263 14 833
% 1.0 8.4 16.4 42.1 32.1 100.0
2) The way gov't operates Sat with Government RunningSATGOVT
Freq 6 50 176 300 236 65 833
% 0.8 6.5 22.9 39.1 30.7 100.0
3) Democracy Sat with DemocracySATDEMC
Freq 37 163 336 167 68 62 833
% 4.8 21.1 43.6 21.7 8.8 100.0
4) Public education Sat with Public EducationSATEDUC
Freq 23 100 269 245 156 40 833
% 2.9 12.6 33.9 30.9 19.7 100.0
5) Public health Sat with Public HealthSATHEAL
Freq 12 104 223 311 152 31 833
% 1.5 13.0 27.8 38.8 19.0 100.0
6) Income Tax Sat with fairness of taxSATTAX
Freq 8 40 140 271 317 57 833
% 1.0 5.2 18.0 34.9 40.9 100.0
정치
5. Which party do you favor?
[Variable Name : PARTYID]
[Variable Labels : Party Identification]
Value Labels Value Freq %
Hokuk Party․․․․․․․․․․․ 0 1 0.1
Grand National Party․․․․․․․ 1 222 26.8 New Millenium Democratic Party․․ 2 259 31.3 United Liberal Democrats ․․․․․ 3 6 0.7 National Unification 21․․․․․․․ 4 5 0.6 Democratic Labor Party ․․․․․․ 5 25 3.0 Dont have favor any party․․․․․ 6 302 36.5
others․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 7 8 1.0
total 828 100.0
DK 8 5
total 833
6. Did you vote for President last December?
[Variable Name : VOTE02]
[Variable Labels : Vote in Presidential election 2002]
Value Labels Value Freq %
Voted ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 1 701 87.7
Did not vote ․․․․․․․․․․․ 2 98 12.3
total 799 100.0
DK 8 3
NA 9 31
total 833
[Variable Name : PRES]
[Variable Labels : Who did you vote for in 2002 presidential election?]
Value Labels Value Freq % Lee, Hye-chang․․․․․․․․ 1 292 42.5 Roh, Moo Hyun․․․․․․․․ 2 368 53.6 Kwon, Young-kil ․․․․․․․ 3 25 3.6
Kim, Kil-soo ․․․․․․․․․ 4 1 0.1
others․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 7 1 0.1
total 687 100.0
DK 8 14
NA 9 132
total 833
6-2. Who would you have voted for, for President, if you have voted?
[Variable Name : IF02WHO]
[Variable Labels : (If didn't vote) Who would you have voted for in 2002 presidentila election]
Value Labels Value Freq % Lee, Hye-chang ․․․․․․․․ 1 15 18.3 Roh, Moo Hyun ․․․․․․․․ 2 57 69.5 Kwon, Young-ki․․․․․․․․ 3 5 6.1 Didn't vote for any candidate․․ 5 3 3.7 others․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 7 2 2.4
total 82 100.0
DK 8 16
NA 9 735
total 833
7. Did you vote in 1997 Presidential election?
[Variable Name : VOTE97]
[Variable Labels : Vote in Pres election 1997]
Value Labels Value Freq % voted․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 1 641 88.2 Did not vote ․․․․․․․․․ 2 86 11.8
total 727 100.0
DK 8 5
NA 9 101
total 833
7-1. To whom did you vote?
[Variable Name : PRES97]
[Variable Labels : Who did you vote for in 1997 presidential election]
Value Labels Value Freq % Kim, Daejung ․․․․․․․․․ 1 315 50.9 Lee, Hye-chang ․․․․․․․․ 2 254 40.1 Lee, Injae ․․․․․․․․․․․ 3 54 8.6 Kwon, Young-kil ․․․․․․․ 4 3 0.5 abstention from voting․․․․․ 5 1 0.1
total 627 100.0
DK 8 14
NA 9 192
total 833
7-2. Who would you have voted for, for President, if you have voted?
[Variable Name : IF97WHO]
[Variable Labels : (If didn't vote)Who would you have vote for in 1997 presidential election]
Value Labels Value Freq % Kim, Daejung ․․․․․․․․․ 1 19 29.7 Lee, Hye-chang ․․․․․․․․ 2 21 32.8 Lee, Injae ․․․․․․․․․․․ 3 18 28.1 Didn't vote for any candidate․․ 5 5 7.8 others․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 7 1 1.6
total 64 100.0
DK 8 29
NA 9 763
total 856
Social Trust
8. I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, please indicate the extent to which you have confidence in each of them.
n
o Question Variable Name (Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels very
trusting somewha t trusting
neither trusting
nor distrusting
somewhat
distrusting very distrusting DK 1) major companies CONBUS
Confidence in major companies
Freq 26 145 245 247 133 37 833
% 3.3 18.2 30.8 31.0 16.7 100.0
2) organized religion CONCLERG Confidence in organized
religion
Freq 65 206 257 204 66 35 833
% 8.1 25.8 32.2 25.6 8.3 100.0
3) education CONEDUC Confidence in education
Freq 38 194 296 220 57 28 833
% 4.7 24.1 36.8 27.3 7.1 100.0
4) labor union CONLABOR Confidence in labor union
Freq 29 181 350 161 47 65 833
% 3.8 23.6 45.6 21.0 6.1 100.0
5) press CONPRESS
Confidence in press
Freq 23 163 269 251 88 39 833
% 2.9 20.5 33.9 31.6 11.1 100.0
6) medicine CONMEDIC Confidence in medicine
Freq 29 158 273 250 101 22 833
% 3.6 19.5 33.7 30.8 12.5 100.0
7) central government
CONCGOV Confidence in central
government
Freq 16 74 249 283 146 65 833
% 2.1 9.6 32.4 36.8 19.0 100.0
8) local government CONLGOV Confidence in local
government
Freq 22 94 248 296 113 60 833
% 2.8 12.2 32.1 38.3 14.6 100.0
9) congress CONLEGIS Confidence in congress
Freq 11 34 133 251 369 35 833
% 1.4 4.3 16.7 31.5 46.2 100.0
10) court CONJUDGE
Confidence in court
Freq 34 164 299 195 85 56 833
% 4.4 21.1 38.5 25.1 10.9 100.0
11) scientific community
CONSCI Confidence in scientific
community
Freq 49 222 350 112 41 59 833
% 6.3 28.7 45.2 14.5 5.3 100.0
12) military CONARMY Confidence in military
Freq 79 206 321 133 49 45 833
% 10.0 26.1 40.7 16.9 6.2 100.0
13) banks and financial institutions
CONFINAN Confidence in banks and
financial institutions
Freq 27 165 309 216 78 38 833
% 3.4 20.8 38.9 27.2 9.8 100.0
14) Blue House CONBLUE Confidence in Blue House
Freq 20 104 296 200 138 75 833
% 2.6 13.7 39.1 26.4 18.2 100.0
15) NGOs CONNGO
Confidence in NGOs
Freq 96 305 255 90 33 54 833
% 12.3 39.2 32.7 11.6 4.2 100.0
[Variable Name : TRUST]
[Variable Labels : Trust in people]
Value Labels Value Freq %
very trusting ․․․․․․․․․․ 1 27 3.2 somewhat trusting․․․․․․․․ 2 336 40.3 neither trusting nor distrusting ․․ 3 323 38.8 somewhat distrusting․․․․․․․ 4 115 13.8 very distrusting ․․․․․․․․․ 5 32 3.8
total 833 100.0
10. Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful, or that they are mostly just looking out for themselves?
[Variable Name : HELPFUL]
[Variable Labels : People's willing to be helpful]
Value Labels Value Freq %
just look out for themselves ․․ 1 528 64.0 try to be helpful․․․․․․․․ 2 297 36.0
total 825 100.0
DK 8 8
total 833
11. Is there any area around your residence where you would be afraid to walk alone at night?
[Variable Name : FEAR]
[Variable Labels : Affaid to walk alone at night]
Value Labels Value Freq %
yes․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 1 266 32.1
no ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 2 563 67.9
total 829 100.0
DK 0 4
total 833
12. Have you or a member of your household been the victim of a burglary or assault in the last 5 years?
[Variable Name : BURGLAR]
[Variable Labels : Victim of burglary or assault in last 5 year]
Value Labels Value Freq %
yes․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 1 147 17.2
no․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ 2 686 82.8
total 833 100.0
13. Please indicate the extent to which you favor or oppose to the idea of having the following relationships with the following people, respectively.
n
o Question Variable Name (Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels
strongly favor favor
neither favor
nor oppose
oppose strongly oppose DK
1) Having immigrants to China as Korean a peer at work
SDCHEM1 Accept Chinese Korean as a
coworker
Freq 97 318 264 86 37 31 833
% 12.1 39.7 32.9 10.7 4.6 100.0
2) Having Korean immigrants to China as a spouse of my children
SDCHEM2
Accept Chinese Korean as Aspouse of my children
Freq 23 122 226 257 158 47 833
% 2.9 15.5 28.8 32.7 20.1 100.0
3) Having East Asian as a
peer at work SDEASA1
Accept East Asian as a coworker
Freq 69 255 309 114 48 38 833
% 8.7 32.1 38.9 14.3 6.0 100.0
4) Having East Asian as a spouse of my children
SDEASA2
Accept East Asian as Aspouse of my children
Freq 13 72 190 289 227 42 833
% 1.6 9.1 24.0 36.5 28.7 100.0
5) Having American as a
peer at work SDAMER1
Accept American as a coworker
Freq 77 264 285 103 72 32 833
% 9.6 33.0 35.6 12.9 9.0 100.0
6) Having American as a spouse of my children
SDAMER2
Accept American as Aspouse of my children
Freq 20 90 203 262 220 38 833
% 2.5 11.3 25.5 33.0 27.7 100.0
7) Having socialists as a
peer at work SDCOMM1
Accept Communist as a coworker
Freq 11 82 154 226 314 46 833
% 1.4 10.4 19.6 28.7 39.9 100.0
8) Having socialists as a spouse of my children
SDCOMM1
Accept Communist as Aspouse of my children
Freq 2 33 103 222 428 45 833
% 0.3 4.2 13.1 28.2 54.3 100.0
14. Do you think of yourself as a trusting person? Are you ...
[Variable Name : TRUSTING][Variable Labels : Think oneself as a trusting person]
Value Labels Value Freq % very trusting ․․․․․․․․․ 1 157 19.1 somewhat trusting․․․․․․․ 2 433 52.6 neither trusting nor distrusting ․ 3 195 23.7 somewhat distrusting․․․․․․ 4 28 3.4 very distrusting ․․․․․․․․ 5 10 1.2
total 823 100.0
DK 8 10
total 833
Social Inequality
15. Please indicate the extent to which you think each of the followings is important to get ahead in this country.
n
o Question Variable Name (Variable
Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels very
important fairly
important neutral little important
at all
not important
at all DK 1) Being born in a wealthy
family OPWLTH
Getting ahead1
Freq 261 327 97 112 34 2 833
% 31.4 39.4 11.7 13.5 4.1 100.0
2) Having well educated
parents OPPARED
Getting ahead2
Freq 182 364 142 116 26 3 833
% 21.9 43.9 17.1 14.0 3.1 100.0
3) Having a good education
yourself OPEDUC
Getting ahead3
Freq 453 295 58 20 2 5 833
% 54.7 35.6 7.0 2.4 0.2 100.0
4) Having an ambition OPAMBIT
Getting ahead4
Freq 321 297 149 47 5 14 833
% 39.2 36.3 18.2 5.7 0.6 100.0
5) Having natural ability OPABLE Getting ahead5
Freq 347 333 114 30 1 8 833
% 42.1 40.4 13.8 3.6 0.1 100.0
6) Working hard OPHRDWRK
Getting ahead6
Freq 587 186 50 7 1 2 833
% 70.6 22.4 6.0 0.8 0.1 100.0
7) Knowing the right people OPKNOW Getting ahead7
Freq 381 344 92 12 2 2 833
% 45.8 41.4 11.1 1.4 0.2 100.0
8) Being graduated from a
prestigious university OPGDSCH Getting ahead8
Freq 232 352 154 78 12 5 833
% 28.0 42.5 18.6 9.4 1.4 100.0
9) Coming from the part of the
country people favor OPREGION Getting ahead9
Freq 66 176 219 262 96 14 833
% 8.1 21.5 26.7 32.0 11.7 100.0
10)Being born as a man OPSEX Getting ahead10
Freq 84 199 225 204 100 21 833
% 10.3 24.5 27.7 25.5 12.3 100.0
n
o Question Variable Name (Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels
strongly
agree agree neutral disagree strongly disagree DK
1)
People would not want to take extra responsibility at work unless they were paid extra for it.
INEQUAL1 Don't take extra responsibility
without extra pay
Freq 139 394 139 123 12 26 833
% 17.2 48.8 17.2 15.2 1.5 100.0
2)
Workers would not bother to get skills and qualifications unless they were paid extra for having them.
INEQUAL2
Don't bother to get skills without extra pay
Freq 169 366 135 127 16 20 833
% 20.8 45.0 16.6 15.6 2.0 100.0
3)
Inequality continues to exist because it benefits the rich and powerful.
INEQUAL3 Inequality exist because it
benefits the rich
Freq 337 326 98 42 5 25 833
% 41.7 40.3 12.1 5.2 0.6 100.0
4)
No one would study for years to become a lawyer or doctor unless they expected to earn a lot more than ordinary workers.
INEQUAL4 Becoming alawyer for alot of
earning
Freq 250 315 125 111 18 14 833
% 30.5 38.5 15.3 13.6 2.2 100.0
5)
Allowing business to make good profits is the best way to improve everyone's standard of living.
INEQUAL6
Allowing business to make good profits
Freq 66 162 203 270 80 52 833
% 8.5 20.7 26.0 34.6 10.2 100.0
6)
Inequality continues to exist because people don't join together to get rid of it.
INEQUAL7 Inequality exist due to people's not working together to get rid of
it
Freq 120 265 182 185 36 45 833
% 15.2 33.6 23.1 23.5 4.6 100.0
7)
There should be a large difference in wage in order to make people work hard.
INCENTIV
Large income gap is necessary to make people work hard
Freq 192 356 177 71 12 25 833
% 23.8 44.1 21.9 8.8 1.5 100.0
8)
Large differences in income are necessary for Korea's
prosperity.
INEQUAL5 Large income gap is necessary
for national prosperity
Freq 94 274 198 153 56 58 833
% 12.1 35.4 25.5 19.7 7.0 100.0
17. Please indicate the extent to which you agree to each of the statements.
n
o Question Variable Name (Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 8
Total Value
Labels strongly
agree agree neutral disagree strongly disagree DK 1) Differences in income in
Korea are too large.
INCGAP Income Differences are too
large
Freq 429 307 56 22 1 18 833
% 52.6 37.7 6.9 2.7 0.1 100.0
2)
It is the responsibility of the government to reduce the differences in income between people with high incomes and those with low incomes.
GOVEQINC Gov's responsibility to reduce
income gap
Freq 216 349 149 89 12 18 833
% 26.5 42.8 18.3 10.9 1.5 100.0
3)
The government should provide more chances for children from poor families to go to college.
GOVEDOP Gov give more chances for
college to kids from poor families
Freq 415 296 84 22 6 10 833
% 50.4 36.0 10.2 2.7 0.7 100.0 4) The government should
provide a job for everyone who wants one.
GOVJOBS
Gov provide job for everyone
Freq 330 295 132 63 7 6 833
% 39.9 35.7 16.0 7.6 0.8 100.0 5) The government should
provide a decent standard of living for the unemployed.
GOVUNEMP Gov let the unemployed keep
their living standard
Freq 218 332 182 80 12 9 833
% 26.5 40.3 22.1 9.7 1.5 100.0 6) The government should spend less on benefits for the poor.
GOVLESS Gov should spend less for
the poor
Freq 36 89 116 288 288 16 833
% 4.4 10.9 14.2 35.3 35.3 100.0 7) The government should
provide everyone with a guaranteed basic income.
GOVMINC Gov guarantee everyone'sbasic income
Freq 151 244 236 145 33 24 833
% 18.7 30.2 29.2 17.9 4.1 100.0
18. Please tell me what you think people in these jobs actually earn each month before taxes. Although this may certainly be difficult, your best guess will be close enough.
n
o Question
Variable Name (Variable Labels)
Value 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 88 99
Total Value
Label s
less than 1 millino won
1- 1.99 million
2.00 - 2.99
3.00 - 3.99
4.00 - 4.99
5.00 - 5.99
6.00 - 6.99
7.00 - 7.99
8.00 - 8.99
9.00 - 9.99
10.00 million
or over
DK NA
1) Carpen ter
PAYCARP
Carpenter's actual earning
Freq 73 332 277 98 7 8 0 1 1 0 0 36 0 833
% 9.2 41.7 34.8 12.3 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 2) Doctor Doctor's actual earningPAYDOC
Freq 1 9 45 118 108 164 69 62 43 17 155 42 0 833
% 0.1 1.1 5.7 14.9 13.7 20.7 8.7 7.8 5.4 2.1 19.6 100.0 3) Bank
clerk
PAYCLERK
Bank clerk's actual earning
Freq 12 201 365 150 42 16 7 3 1 0 0 36 0 833
% 1.5 25.2 45.8 18.8 5.3 2.0 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 4) School
teacher
PAYTEAC
School teacher's actual earning
Freq 15 275 392 105 7 4 2 2 1 0 0 30 0 833
% 1.9 34.2 48.8 13.1 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 5) Small
shop owner
PAYOWNER
Small shop owner's actual earning
Freq 185 350 180 55 8 9 0 0 0 0 1 45 0 833
% 23.5 44.4 22.8 7.0 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 100.0 6) Skilled
worker
PAYSKILL
Skilled worker's actual earning
Freq 65 355 262 85 12 3 0 1 0 1 1 48 0 833
% 8.3 45.2 33.4 10.8 1.5 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 100.0 7) Famer Famer's actual earningPAYFARM
Freq 316 335 94 27 8 2 1 1 0 1 1 47 0 833
% 40.2 42.6 12.0 3.4 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 100.0 8) Secreta
ry
PAYSEC
Secretary's actual earning
Freq 85 405 217 50 7 8 2 0 0 0 2 57 0 833
% 11.0 52.2 28.0 6.4 0.9 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 100.0
9)
Large Compan y's new worker
PAYBUSI
Large Company's new worker's actual earning
Freq 86 486 197 24 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 0 833
% 10.8 60.8 24.7 3.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0
10) Bus driver
PAYBUS
Bus driver's actual earning
Freq 47 538 191 20 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 32 0 833
% 5.9 67.2 23.8 2.5 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0
11) Local police chief offficer
PAYPOLI
Local police chief offficer's actual earning
Freq 14 192 371 178 20 3 2 2 0 0 0 51 0 833
% 1.8 24.6 47.4 22.8 2.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
12) Unskill ful worker
PAYUNSKL
Unskillful worker's actual earning
Freq 539 211 31 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 46 0 833
% 68.5 26.8 3.9 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 100.0 13) Lawyer
PAYLAW
Lawyer's actual earning
Freq 4 8 34 96 127 155 63 57 36 18 188 47 0 833
% 0.5 1.0 4.3 12.2 16.2 19.7 8.0 7.3 4.6 2.3 23.9 100.0
14)
Depart ment sales clerk
PAYSALES
Department sales clerk's actual earning
Freq 231 487 57 11 2 3 1 3 0 0 1 37 0 833
% 29.0 61.2 7.2 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 100.0
15)
Small-to medium -size
firm owner
PAYFCTRY
Small-to medium-size firm owner's actual
earning
Freq 3 12 73 155 155 152 58 28 28 17 86 66 0 833
% 0.4 1.6 9.5 20.2 20.2 19.8 7.6 3.7 3.7 2.2 11.2 100.0
16)
P e o p l e in your occupat ion
PAYROCC
People's actual earning in frespondent's
occupation
Freq 94 182 98 37 10 8 3 3 2 1 1 20 374 833
% 21.4 41.5 22.3 8.4 2.3 1.8 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.2 100.0
