F usion Reactor Technology I
(459.760, 3 Credits)
Prof. Dr. Yong-Su Na
(32-206, Tel. 880-7204)
Week 1. Magnetic Confinement
Week 2. Fusion Reactor Energetics (Harms 2, 7.1-7.5)
Week 3. How to Build a Tokamak (Dendy 17 by T. N. Todd) Week 4. Tokamak Operation (I): Startup
Week 5. Tokamak Operation (II):
Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters (Wood 1.2, 1.3) Week 7-8. Tokamak Operation (III): Tokamak Operation Mode Week 9-10. Tokamak Operation Limits (I):
Plasma Instabilities (Kadomtsev 6, 7, Wood 6) Week 11-12. Tokamak Operation Limits (II):
Plasma Transport (Kadomtsev 8, 9, Wood 3, 4) Week 13. Heating and Current Drive (Kadomtsev 10)
Week 14. Divertor and Plasma-Wall Interaction
2
Contents
Week 1. Magnetic Confinement
Week 2. Fusion Reactor Energetics (Harms 2, 7.1-7.5)
Week 3. How to Build a Tokamak (Dendy 17 by T. N. Todd) Week 4. Tokamak Operation (I): Startup
Week 5. Tokamak Operation (II):
Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters (Wood 1.2, 1.3) Week 7-8. Tokamak Operation (III): Tokamak Operation Mode Week 9-10. Tokamak Operation Limits (I):
Plasma Instabilities (Kadomtsev 6, 7, Wood 6) Week 11-12. Tokamak Operation Limits (II):
Plasma Transport (Kadomtsev 8, 9, Wood 3, 4) Week 13. Heating and Current Drive (Kadomtsev 10)
Week 14. Divertor and Plasma-Wall Interaction
Contents
Plasma Current
CS Coil Current (kA)
(MA)
t (s)
t (s)
Pulsed Operation
Power Supply Limit
Inherent drawback of Tokamak!
Faraday‘s law
ds dt B
v d
S
⋅
−
= ∫
4
Steady-state operation d/dt ~ 0
Plasma Current
CS Coil Current (kA)
(MA)
t (s)
t (s)
Steady-State Operation
6
Tokamak Operation Modes
q-profiles
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 0.5 1
strong
weak Reversed
shear
r/a
z Good confinement
z Poor stability
H-modeELMy
Tokamak Operation Modes
q-profiles
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 0.5 1
strong
weak Reversed
shear
r/a
z Good confinement
z Poor stability
H-modeELMy
z Only “weak” RS plasmas are stable but they require a
delicate active control 8
Tokamak Operation Modes
Reversed Shear Mode
• Hollow current profile
•
Higher pressure gradient region in the core with steep edge pedestal
• Reversed q-profile
• With negative magnetic shear
High bootstrap current!
10
Reversed Shear Mode
Reversed shear mode H-mode
Reversed Shear Mode
12
Reversed Shear Mode
Turbulence Stabilisation
• Formation of internal transport barriers to improve confinement - Reversed magnetic shear
- Differential rotation (input power) Stabilises turbulence
xB
• One reason:
Losses of fast ions at the plasma edge Î sheared radial electric field
Î sheared ExB rotation
Î eddies get tilted and ripped apart cause turbulence suppression!
⊗ B
E
Turbulence Stabilisation
Z
R
Z
R
Contour lines of electric potential
.
Contour lines of electric potential.
ITB
Temperature profile
• Formation of internal transport barriers to improve confinement - Reversed magnetic shear
- Differential rotation (input power) Stabilises turbulence
Turbulence Stabilisation
16
Reversed Shear Mode
Reversed shear mode H-mode
Non-monotonic current profile Turbulence suppression
High pressure gradients Large bootstrap current
• Operation at lower plasma current: f
BS ~ βp ~ Ip-2→ Confinement degradation: τE ~ H98(y,2) Ip0.93
→ To get enough fusion power: H98(y,2) > 1 (advanced)
Reversed Shear Mode
•
Plasma current diffusion into the core from the edgeCurrent and pressure profile control !
Sustainment of Non-monotonic Current Profile
18
Current density
q-profile
Plasma radius edge centre
Non-monotonic current profile Turbulence suppression High pressure gradients Large bootstrap current Non-inductive current drive
Current drive and current profile control
20
Current drive and current profile control
Toroidal direction
Ion gyro-motion
Fast ion trajectory
Poloidal direction
Projection of poloidally trapped ion trajectory
R B
• Bootstrap current
http://tfy.tkk.fi/fusion/research/
ASCOT
Current drive and current profile control
z But more & faster particles on orbits nearer the core (green cf blue) lead to a net “banana current”
Currents due to neighbouring bananas
largely cancel
orbits tighter where field stronger
dr J
boot~ dP
• Bootstrap current
22
Current drive and current profile control
• Bootstrap current
Non-monotonic current profile Turbulence suppression High pressure gradients Large bootstrap current Non-inductive current drive
Current drive and current profile control
Cf. NTM control
time Ip
III: Performance at stable q(r)
I: Reverse q(r)
II: Create ITB q95~ 5
I: Heat during current rise, external current drive (reverse q).
II: Increase heating power to stabilise turbulence (ITB).
Improve plasma confinement, try to increase pressure (β
N)
III: Keep going: ITER non-inductive regime: H
H≈1.6; β
N≈3.0
(ITER: 9MA, 50% external current drive (73MW), 50% bootstrap fraction)
Technique used since mid 1990´s
Reversed Shear Scenario
Reversed Shear Scenario
I: Form q(r), II: create ITB, III: But discharge terminates (unstable)
0 10
20
0 1 2
0 5 10
0 2 4 6
3 4 5 6 7 8
0 1 2 3
0 10 20 30
[keV][MA][MJ] [MW][1016 /s][arb.]
E040259
P
NBI
PP
ECT
ioT
eoTime [s]
W
dianeutron rate m / n = 4 /1 interchange mode
current hole
I: preheat
II: create ITB
JT-60U (R0=3.3m. a=0.8m. )• Formation of an ITB at low n
e, with 15 MW NBI power
T
i> T
e, high rotation shear
• ITBs are relatively short lived, only few τ
E• Good, transient performance:
H
89~3, β
N~ 3
• ITB not compatible with H-mode edge barrier and large ELMs
Reversed Shear Scenario
(R0=1.7m. ,a=0.6m. )
• Less RS
• H
H98(y,2)= 1.37
• β
N= 2.62
• q
95= 5
• „Weak“ ITBs
Reversed Shear Scenario
MSE, Magnetic Probe Measurements Controller
j (r) from Analysis Methods NBI
• Current density profile control at ASDEX Upgrade
28
Reversed Shear Scenario
•
Modulation combinations of actuators (NBI, LH, ICRH) to infer the coefficients of the state space model of the slow loop.•
RT Current and Pressure Profile Control
•
Simultaneous control of distributed magnetic and kinetic paramters•
Dedicated experiments to identify controller coefficients30
RT Current and Pressure Profile Control
• Real time pressure profile and
q-profile control to keep ITB steady
Mazon et al, PPCF 2002
qMSE qmin qmin,ref ΔPLH
MSE LH
MSE
LH
y Transport reductionat t = 12.4 s
y Time delay in response of qmin
jOH or jBS change
Time (s)
q minP LH(MW)P NB(MW) βN
ref.
command T e(keV)
r/a~0.2
0.4
0.6
•
JT60-U: Real time qmin control with MSE diagnostics and LHCD