• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

Cognitive Radar

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "Cognitive Radar"

Copied!
46
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

Chapter 6.

Cognitive Radar

Jibeom Choi

Laboratory Behavioral Ecology & Evolution School of Biological Science

From CDS written by S. Haykin

(2)

No ta tio n No tifica tio n

X_n =

S~_(n-1) =

x^_n =

(3)

Wh a t is Ra d a r?

Function of radar : remote-sensing system (1) Traditional active radar : it transmits and receives the signal sent to the environment.

(feedforward)

(2) Fore-active radar : it distributes

capacity(scantime, library of transmit waveform).

(3) Cognitive radar

(4)

Wh a t is Ra d a r?

For a radar to be cognitive, it requires

(1) Perception action cycle

(2) Memory for predicting the consequences of actions (3) Attention for prioritizing the allocation of resources (4) Intelligence for decision-making

(5)

Radar environment : electromagnetic medium where target of interest is embedded Observable : “radar returns” produced by reflections from target

* State estimation serves as “perception” of the environment

(6)

Ba se lin e Mo d e l fo r Sig n a l Tra n sm issio n

Payoff for CF & LFM

CF : Constant-frequency pulse, good for range-rate(velocity) resolution, poor for range(position) resolution

LFM : Linear frequency-modulated pulse, poor for range-rate resolution, good for range resolution

Solution : Combination two forms of modulations

Uncertainty

principle for radar

(7)

Ba se lin e Mo d e l fo r Sig n a l Tra n sm issio n

Re : Real part

s~(t) : Envelop of s_T(t)

E_T : Energy of transmitted signal

Transmitted signal toward target

(8)

Ba se lin e Mo d e l fo r Sig n a l Tra n sm issio n

Shift by Doppler effect Go-and-comeback time

Target Acquired.

(9)

Sta te -sp a ce m o d e l o f th e ta rg e t

(true value)

Measurement equation Systems equation

(observation value)

(10)

Pro b a b ility-d istrib u tio n Flo w -g ra p h

(11)

Pro b a b ility-d istrib u tio n Flo w -g ra p h

Old posterior(old information)

State transition of the object

Predicative distribution

Joint state-measurement distribution Predicted measurement distribution

Updated posterior(new information)

(12)

Co n d itio n a l Pro b a b ility fo r Mu ltip le Co n d itio n s

Probability of A to happen on assumption that B already happened:

Probability of A to happen on assumption that B,C already happened:

(13)

Ga u ssia n Distrib u tio n

Gaussian(Normal) distribution whose variable is x, average is u(mu) and sigma is the covariance.

(14)

Ga u ssia n Distrib u tio n

Systems equation

(15)

Lin e a r vs. No n -Lin e a r

For some operator L,

For arbitrary vectors a and b, and scalar k, L is said to be linear map if

L(ka) = kL(a), L(a+b) = L(a) + L(b)

cf. If L(a) is M*a where M is a matrix, then L(a) is linear

(16)

Tim e Up d a te

Estimation(expectation) of x_n given all the history

For every possible x_(n-1), we multiply the probability to get the expected value

Probability for the certain x_(n-1) follows normal distribution whose average is x^_(n-1)

(17)

Ad d itio n a l Exp la n a tio n

Suppose we play a dice game : Rule : 1, 2 → 5 $ reward

3, 4 → no reward 5, 6 → 2 $ penalty Expected value

= sum(result * p of that result to happen)

= 1/3 * 5 + 1/3 * 0 + 1/3 * (-2)

= 1 ($)

(18)

Ad d itio n a l Exp la n a tio n

In generalized form,

Probability of x_(n-1) to happen

Result when x_(n-1) happened

(19)

Me a su re m e n t Up d a te

(20)

Co st-to -g o Fu n ctio n

Radar thought the object was placed at x^_n The actual object however is located at x_n

(21)

Co st-to -g o Fu n ctio n

Using mean-square error

Using Shannon’s entropy

(22)

Ad d itio n a l Exp la n a tio n

Q : What is entropy?

A : Roughly speaking, the amount of ‘messiness’.

(23)

D ir e c te d I nf or m a tion Fl o w -gr a ph

(24)

Dire cte d In fo rm a tio n Flo w -g ra p h

1. The radar receives the signal(electromagnetic wave, s~_(n-1)) and measure the target’s property. (Perception part)

(25)

Dire cte d In fo rm a tio n Flo w -g ra p h

2. State of the object and corresponding errors are predicted .

(26)

Dire cte d In fo rm a tio n Flo w -g ra p h

3. Feedback is performed to

obtain the cost-to-go function. The cost-to-go function and control

policy are updated to minimize the error.

(Action part)

(27)

Ca se Stu d y: Tra ckin g a Fa llin g Ob je ct

x_1 : altitude x_2 : velocity

x_3 : ballistic coefficient

(28)

Ca se Stu d y: Tra ckin g a Fa llin g Ob je ct

State part

Initial state

How states vary

Generalized expression of the state

(29)

Ca se Stu d y: Tra ckin g a Fa llin g Ob je ct

Measurement part

(30)

Ca se Stu d y: Tra ckin g a Fa llin g Ob je ct

(31)

Ca se Stu d y: Tra ckin g a Fa llin g Ob je ct

Ensemble-Averaged Root Mean Square Error

(32)

Ca se Stu d y: Tra ckin g a Fa llin g Ob je ct

(33)

Co g n itive Ra d a r w ith Sin g le La ye r o f Me m o ry

Perceptual memory : general understanding toward the environment, coupled with environmental scene analyzer

Executive memory : memory related with the actuator’s actions

Working memory : short-span memory for prediction and attention

(34)

Co g n itive Ra d a r w ith Sin g le La ye r o f Me m o ry

(35)

Co m m u n ica tio n in Co g n itive Ra d a r

Step 1. Receiver sends measurement to the perceptual memory; the goal is to retrieve particular function a() that best matches.

Step 2. System equations are updated and new features of

environment is sent to the perceptual memory as information A_in.

The information is temporarily stored as an working memory.

(36)

Co m m u n ica tio n in Co g n itive Ra d a r

Step 3. Feedback information is computed based on error vector and sent to the actuator. Kalman filter is used.

Step 4. The feedback information is sent to the executive memory.

The goal is to retrieve particular subset of transmit-waveform library that best fit to the radar environment as information B_in.

(37)

Co m m u n ica tio n in Co g n itive Ra d a r

Step 5. The new subset of waveform library is fed back to the environmental scene actuator. Cost-to-go function is formulated to select optimum transmit waveform.

Step 6. Output A_out corresponding to A_in, and B_out corresponding to B_in is sent to the executive memory.

(38)

Co m m u n ica tio n in Co g n itive Ra d a r

(39)

In te rp re ta tio n o f Trip le Me m o ry Syste m

What is that thing on the plant?

Aha, it is a moth!

Moth, moth, moth…. What should I do?

It would better if I pay more attention to it!

Executive memory

Perceptual memory

Working memory

(40)

Th e Co m p o sitio n o f Pe rce p t

Percept : Snapshot of the perception process.

Component 1 : Recognition and, therefore, retrieval of a set of nonlinear functions and associated system noise variances, which are stored in the perceptual memory.

Component 2 : Categorization(classification) of features in the new measurements that are matched with the memory

(41)

Th e Co m p o sitio n o f Exe cu tio n

Execution : Snapshot of the decision-making process

Component 1 : Recognition and retrieval of a particular set in the waveform library, which is stored in the executive memory.

Component 2 : Categorization of the current feedback information that is matched with the memory.

(42)

Co m m u n ica tio n s With in th e Me m o ry Syste m

Perceptual memory - Receiver Executive memory - Transmitter

Working memory acts as on the “mediator” between the two memories through a matching process

(43)

Cognitive Radar w ith M ultiscale M emory

(44)

Cognitive Radar w ith M ultiscale M emory

Benefits :

Radar’s capabilities of perception, memory, attention, and intelligence are strengthened;

The Environmental disturbances become less effective.

Temporal discontinuity can be modified.

“The estimation accuracy of range and range-rate will progressively improve with increasing depth of the multiscale memory.”

(45)

Sp a rse Co d in g

Goal : Redundancy Reduction

Analogy with a brain :

“The principle of sparse coding refers to a neural code, in which each sensory input of a nervous system is represented by the strong activation of a relatively small number of neurons out of a large population of

neurons in the system.”

- Olshausen and Field, 1996

(46)

Sp a rse Co d in g

Advantages of sparse coding :

Increased storage capacity in memories

Representation of complex signals in a manner easier to recognize at higher levels of memory

More robust to noise Saving of energy

- Olshausen and Field, 1996

참조

관련 문서

This paper estimate detection range used to probability of detection in radar equation that used to swerling case 1 in case of radar cross section is small and used to swerling

In the practical driving environment, timing mismatch among radar signals is inevitable because the radar signals of several vehicles are independently

Abstract This study examined the quality improvement of printed circuit boards (PCBs) in relation to the power consumption for radar.. The radar examined is currently in

In this paper, to analyze the detection performance of a multi function radar for a ship, a sea clutter model suitable for the radar operating environment is selected

In this paper, in addition to objects detection, a method of retrieving precipitation information using the automotive radar data is proposed.. The proposed method is based on

In this study, LSTM networks is used to estimate the quantitative precipitation from weather radar for an urban catchment in South Korea.. Radar information and rain-gauge data are

Abstract This study examined the quality improvement of printed circuit boards (PCBs) in relation to the power consumption for radar.. The radar examined is currently in

In this paper, in addition to objects detection, a method of retrieving precipitation information using the automotive radar data is proposed.. The proposed method is based on the