생태계 요소를 반영한 방송통신 - 규제체계의 정립 방안

*

. . 1.

2.

. 1.

2.

.

.

* 2011

( : KCA-2011-09-941-00-001).

** ,

***

: 2011. 10. 30 / : 2011. 11. 25 / : 2011. 12. 7

I.

10 ·

(horizontal regulatory framework)

.¹⁾

,

.

· ,

.

(Apple), (Google)

(eco-system) (keystone-player)²⁾

,

. ,

1) (EU) 1997 (Green Paper) 2002 4

( , “ ”, IT

3 , IT , 2009, 135-137 ). ‘

’ , 2010

( , “ ,

‘ ( ) · ”, 23

2 , , 2011). 2010. 3.

5 1

.

2) (mobile ecosystem)

(Operating System, OS)

. (SoftBank)

, , .

,

, .

.

.

.

.

,

3)

.

2 3

.

3)

, ,

( , “ ”, ,

, , 2011, 134 ).

, ,

.

.

.

, ,

, , ,

.

, ,

(silo regulatory framework) .

,

.⁴⁾ , All-IP

,

.⁵⁾ TV,

, ,

.⁶⁾

·

. ,

4) , “ ”, 3

2 , , 2010.11., 112-113 .

5) , “ ”,

35 3 , , 2010. 3., 537 .

6) , , 113 .

7)

.

· ,

,

.⁸⁾⁹⁾

. ,

(transmission) (content)

(layered model) .¹⁰⁾

7)

. ,

, VoIP(Voice over

Internet Protocol)

. , “

”, , 2009, 115 .

8) , , 113 .

9) , ,

( ,

,

07-06, 2007, 31 ) .

10) , , 134~135 . 2

,

. ,

.¹¹⁾

5 1

.¹²⁾

EU 15

.

13) ,

(symbiotic)

, .¹⁴⁾

.

11) , -

-, , 2009, 62 .

12) , ( 5), 537 .

13) (ecosystem) (A.G. Tansley)

, · ·

. ( , organism)

( ) . 2006

‘ (networked digital ecosystem)’

‘ ’ .

,

, , ,

. , , , 2009, 276 .

14) Fransman, Martin, “The New ICT Ecosystem-Implications for Policy and Regulation”, Cambridge University Press, 2010 ELM(ecosystem layer model)

. , “ ”, 23 2

, , 2011 26 .

,

.

.

,

15)

.

.

(co-evolution)¹⁶⁾ ,

15)

. , China Mobile SoftBank . AT&T

. ·

, “ ”, KT , 2011, 2~4 .

16) ,

(feedback loop)

.

, , ,

. · , “

”, Telecommunication Review 21 1 , SKT, 2011, 11~12 .

.¹⁷⁾ , 2

,

.

( )

5

1 .

.

< > , N-Screen ¹⁸⁾

17) · , “ ”,

Telecommuni- cation Review 20 1 , SKT, 2010, 11-12

. ,

, , , , ,

, , ·

. 18) N

. ,

TV , PC

19) .

SKT, KT ,

m-VoIP .

.²⁰⁾

.

< >

: , “ ”, TTA ,

, 2010. 5., 16 , , , 34 ;

3, 2011 , KT , 2011, 7 .

. , “N ”,

22 20 , , 2010, 1 .

19) , , 35 .

20) IT .

, ,

. , “ TV

”, , 2011. 1, 12 .

.

.

, .

21) ,

(Lock-in)

.

.

.

,

.

.

21) Strømmen-Bakhtiar and Razavi(2008) ,

. Huang et al.(2009)

. 2 ,

, 10-6, , 2010, 29~30 .

.

22) ,

.

(co-opetition)

.²³⁾

.²⁴⁾

.

OS ,

22) Boley , ,

. · , “

”, Telecommunication Review, SKT, 2011, 17 . 23)

. (Product Value) (Network Value)

,

. · , , 3 .

24) , , 12 .

25)

.²⁶⁾

,²⁷⁾

.²⁸⁾

,

.

,

.

25) Google, Amazon, Microsoft (cloud

vendor) , ,

. · , , 17 .

26) (birth), (expansion), (leadership)

(self-renewal) ,

. , 21 .

27) (Dominator)

(Keystone player) .

Keystone Player Dominator

×,

Google, Apple Comcast -

28)

Strømmen-Bakhtiar and Razavi, “Emerging Problems in the Digital Business Ecosystem”, 1st OPAALS conference 2008, Tampere, Finland: 2008, Tampere University of Technology (TUT), 2008(http://matwww.ee.tut.fi/hypermedia/events/opaals2008/article/

opaals2008-article26.pdf ), 1 .

Android OS

Android .²⁹⁾

.

‘ ’ ³⁰⁾

.

ADK(Application Develop Kit) 70%

.

.³¹⁾

29) , “ Google ”,

, 2007. 10., 10 .

30) “ ` ` ( )

PC (OS) ` `

. ` ` , , TV, ,

, ( )

.

. ( )

( ) .” ,

2011. 5. 12. (“ ”)

31) · , “ :

”, 23 10 , , 2011. 6., 28 .

Android OS

, , , iOS

.

. China Mobile SoftBank

, AT&T

32)

. TV

OS

33) , Amazon

.³⁴⁾

. ,

,

32) · , , 2~4 .

33) S, , TV

, OS

. T-Store TV

TV TV

. , “2011 Device

”, DigiEco Focus , KT , 2011, 10 .

HTML5 ' ‘(Tizen)

, OS .

34) “ .

PC ‘ ’ .

, .

95 , 10 , 1,700 .

.” 2011. 10. 3.

(“ OS· , · ”)

.

.

.³⁵⁾

(leverage)

T-Store

.

,

.

35) , , 25, 35 .

.

, .

, ,

.

36)

.

, .

, ,

37)38) ,

36) ,

. ‘

’ ,

.

.

37) (Federal Communications Commission, FCC) 2010 5

14 CMRS(Commercial Mobile Radio Service)

.

,

.

.

,

.

(mobile wireless ecosystem)

. FCC

. ,

, (access)

. ·

, “ FCC ”, 22 17

, , 2010, 7 ; Federal Communications Commission, Annual

Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Mobile Wireless, Including Commercial Mobile Services, Fourteenth Report, 2010. 4. (http://www.fcc.gov/

reports/commercial-mobile-radio-services-cmrs-competition-report-14th- annual ), p.5.

38) FCC . 6 27

14 CMRS

15 CMRS ( http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/ attachmatch/

FCC-11-103A1.pdf ) , 16 CMRS

. FCC Public Notice, “WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON THE STATE OF MOBILE WIRELESS COMPETITION”, Released: November 3, 2011(http://transition.fcc.

gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db1103/DA-11-1856A1.pdf ), pp.1~2 .

39) ,

.

.

(Significant Market Power, SMP)⁴⁰⁾

.

.

.

34 2 ,

(“IPTV ”) 12

, 35 5 3 (

) ⁴¹⁾

39) , “ ”, 18 ,

, 2007, 2~3 .

40) SMP , ,

(sector-specific)

EU Oftel . 2, “ :

”, KISDI 04-12, , 2004, 9 .

41) 2011. 7. 14. .

, IPTV 12

.

, 11 2 .

42) 43)

.

.⁴⁴⁾

,

.

IPTV

.

42) 38 ,

, ,

, .

43) 39 , , ,

,

50 .

44) IPTV

IPTV IPTV

, , 281 ;

, , 22 .

.⁴⁵⁾

.

11 2

4 1

, ,

, ,

.

(Product Market Approach) ,

(Cluster Market Approach) .⁴⁶⁾

,

.

,

.

45)

· · · · , IPTV

, 10-01, , 2010, 26 .

46)

· , “

-

-”, 23 , , 2011. 5., 324~326 .

(special competition law) .⁴⁷⁾

4

, , ,

.

. ,

, , ⁴⁸⁾,

. ,

. ,

.⁴⁹⁾

.

47) EU

,

. EU 2002 (Framework Directive) 15 1 .

48)

.

2011. 4. 27. (“ , 1 ?”)

49)

. , , 24 .

OS .

.

(SMP) ,

.

,

.

, ,

,

.

, 34 38

3 (“ ”)

.⁵⁰⁾ , IPTV

50) 38 3

, , .

.

38 3

, (soft law)⁵¹⁾

52) , ,

.

53) .

,

.⁵⁴⁾ EU ^{55) 56)}

.

51) “

” . Snyder, F., “Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community”, EUI Working Papers (Law) No. 93/5, 1993.

52)

, ,

.

.

53) , ,

, EU ,

.

. , ,

4 .

54) , , 281 .

55) , 2009 , 2009-03, , 2009,

16~32 .

56) , “ ”,

1 2 , , 2008, 355 .

. 39

.

.

.

.

,

.

.

,

2 3

.

,

.

.

.

,

57)

,

.

2 3

. EU, OECD 2 ⁵⁸⁾

.

. 3

.

57) , “ ”,

1 1 , , 2011, 142 .

58) · , “ ”,

24 , , 2007, 267, 277~278 .

59) 3

. 3

60) .

.

“

( ) ( ) ( ) ”

.⁶¹⁾

2 3

,

.

59) ,

,

.

60) , (aggregator) ,

, ‘

’ , (packaging)

‘ ’ . ,

“ TV ”, TTA Journal Vol. 135,

, 2011, 71 .

61) “ /

.

.”

.

. , 69 .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

2 3

.

.

2 3

.

, , , 2007.

, , , 2011.

5, ,

, 2008.

, , , 2009.

2, , 10-6,

, 2010.

, ,

09-05, , 2009

,

, 07-06, , 2007.

, -

-, , 2009.

, 2009 , 2009-03,

, 2009.

, “ :

”, 23 10 ,

, 2011.

, “ FCC ”,

22 17 , , 2010.

, “ TV ”, TTA Journal Vol.

135, , 2011.

, “ ”,

23 2 , , 2011.

, “N ”, 22

20 , , 2010.

, “ ”,

Tele- communication Review , SKT, 2011.

, , , “N-Screen ”,

29(7), , 2011

, “ ”, KT

, 2011.

, “2011 Device ”, DigiEco Focus , KT

, 2011.

, “ , ‘ ( )’

”, 23 2 , , 2011.

, “ ”,

3 2 , , 2010.

, “ ”, Telecommunication

Review 21 1 , SKT, 2011.

2, “ : ”, KISDI

04-12, , 2004.

, “ ,

35 3 , , 2010.

______, “ ”,

, 2009.

, “ ”,

24 , , 2007.

, “ Google ”,

, 2007.

, “ ”,

18 , , 2007.

, “ ”, 1

1 , , 2011.

, “ ”,

, , 2008.

, “ ”, IT 3 ,

IT , 2009.

, “ -

-”,

23 , , 2010.

, “ TV ”, , 2011.

Federal Communications Commission, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Mobile Wireless, Including Commercial Mobile Services, Fourteenth Report, 2010. 4.

(http://www.fcc.gov/reports/commercial-mobile-radio-services-cmrs -competition-report-14th-annual )

Crawford, Susan P., “The Internet and the Project of Communications Law”, UCLA Law Review, 2007(SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=962594

)

FCC Public Notice, “WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON THE STATE OF MOBILE WIRELESS COMPETITION”, Released: November 3, 2011(http://transition.fcc.gov/

Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db1103/DA-11-1856A1.pdf )

Iansiti, Marco and Greg Richards, “Six Years Later: the impact of the evolution of the IT Ecosystem”, Symposium : The End of the Microsoft Antitrust Case?, Antitrust Law Journal, 2009.

Strømmen-Bakhtiar and Razavi, “Emerging Problems in the Digital Business Ecosystem”, 1st OPAALS conference 2008, Tampere, Finland: 2008, Tampere University of Technology (TUT), 2008(http://matwww.ee.

tut.fi/hypermedia/ events/opaals2008/article/opaals2008-article26.pdf )

Snyder, F., “Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community”, EUI Working Papers (Law) No. 93/5, 1993.

World Economic Forum, “Executive Summary”, Digital Ecosystem Convergence between IT, Telecoms, Media and Entertainment: Scenarios to 2015, 2007.

< >

.

.

. ,

. ,

,

.

.

.

.

2 3

.

.

2 3

.

Abstract

Establishment Method of the Regulatory Framework for Communications Reflecting the Ecosystem Elements

Hong, Dae-Sik*, Choe, Dong-Uk **⁶²⁾ The discussion on the adoption of the horizontal regulatory framework is underway to overcome the problems regarding the vertical regulatory framework resulting from a convergence of broadcasting and telecommunications services.

Recently, however, the horizontal regulatory framework shows its limitation to regulate the ecosystem established mainly by Google and Apple. The existing horizontal regulatory framework does not fully reflect the characteristics of the two-sided market and the change in the competition structure in the broadcasting and telecommunications sector. What is important to note is that if the existing horizontal regulatory framework is simply applied to the ecosystem, a regulatory imbalance can be caused among ecosystems. The existing horizontal regulatory framework, which is subject to a value chain structure, categorizes business entities into either contents layer or transmission layer and applies the same regulation to all business entities in the same category. However, in the ecosystem, a keystone-player can be categorized into different layers depending on its strategy. Therefore, if the existing horizontal regulatory framework is applied as it is, the regulatory imbalance between keystone-players located in less regulated areas and keystone-players located in more regulated areas occurs resulting in a distortion of competition.

There are two possible ways to establish a new regulatory framework to prevent the distortion of competition likely to be caused by the adoption of a horizontal regulatory system. First, a new ecosystem regulatory framework different from the existing one can be established. Second, the horizontal regulatory framework can be modified to reflect the ecosystem elements. The first approach is hard to adopt given the current situation as the approach requires the analysis of all

* Professor, Sogang University Law School

** J.D. student, Sogang University Law School

Journal of Legislation Research / 41th Issue

:

broadcasting and telecommunications ecosystems including mobile and wired services; currently research and study on the competition conditions in the ecosystems is not enough. Therefore, this paper supports the second approach proposing a modified horizontal regulatory framework through the improvement of institutions and remedies suitable for accommodating the ecosystem elements.

This paper intends to propose a way to regulate broadcasting and telecommunications ecosystems taking into consideration the ecosystem elements on top of the Telecommunications Business Act, Broadcasting Act, IPTV Act, the competition condition evaluation system of the Basic Act on Broadcasting and Telecommunications Development, and regulation on common carriers under the Telecommunications Business Act.