• 검색 결과가 없습니다.

The Characteristics of ZnO/SnO<sub>2</sub> Sensing Materials by Ultrasonic and Hydrothermal Treatments to Volatile Organic Compounds

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Characteristics of ZnO/SnO<sub>2</sub> Sensing Materials by Ultrasonic and Hydrothermal Treatments to Volatile Organic Compounds"

Copied!
5
0
0

로드 중.... (전체 텍스트 보기)

전체 글

(1)

pISSN 1225-5475/eISSN 2093-7563

 Ωƒ ◊ ˆ≠≥Æ˝° «—

ZnO/SnO

2 æ≠«

˙Ûμ

VOC

¿Ø∫

ØÿŒ1 μ¬Δ1 ظ‚2 „ıˆ1,+

The Characteristics of ZnO/SnO2Sensing Materials by

Ultrasonic and Hydrothermal Treatments to Volatile Organic Compounds

Joon-Boo Yu1, Seung-Hoon Do1, Hyung-Gi Byun2, and Jeung-Soo Huh1,+

Abstract

The important factors in sensors are sensitivity, selectivity, and response time. Oxide semiconductors are high sensitivity, fast response and the advantage of miniaturization. Zn-doped SnO2materials have been synthesized in order to improve the selectivity of the sensor.

ZnO/ SnO2crystals were prepared by a simple hydrothermal process and ultrasound pretreated hydrothermal process. ZnO/ SnO2urchins were fabricated in the precursor solution with [Zn2+]:[Sn4+] ratio of 1:5 and rod structures were fabricated ratio of 1:1 and 1:3. Surface area ratio was increased by increasing the ratio of [Sn4+]. The sensitivity of sensors were highest at the [Zn2+]:[Sn4+] ratio of 1:5 in ethanol, acetaldehyde, toluene, and nitric oxide .

Keywords : ZnO-SnO2, Hydrothermal, Ultrasonic, VOC

1. ≠ –

›μºƒ °∫æ≠¬ ºÛÕ›μº •Ȱ °∫° ¢Àflª ß œÓ™¬ ¸‚¸μμ« Ø≠¶ ÃΜÁ, ÎŒ– ̬°≠ »§—

›” Í≠∞à ¿ßø» ¨∏«Ó ‘Ÿ. ›μºƒ °∫æ≠° ¨∏

° ˝fl«Ó ÷¬ ÃØ¬ ˆ”μ° ¸£Ì ʶ˚ÃÁ, ˚Á— ∑

°¶¶ ÁÎœÈ Ø§°∫° Η ±√∫ª Ùœ ˆ ÷¬ ° ߯ ß[1-5].

°∫æ≠Œ πà ÃÎ«Ì ÷¬ Á·¬SnO2¶ Ò‘œ© ZnO, TiO2, In2O3, WO3Óà ¨∏«Ó ¿Ì ÷Ÿ. ؘZnOÕSnO2¬

ŸÁ— Ø∂∫ ◊ °¨∫ °∫ˆ° πà ÁÎ«Ì ÷Ÿ[6, 7]. °

∫æ≠« ˆ…¬ª ‚Û√∞¬ Ê˝∏Œ °∫Õ« ¢ÀÈ˚ª ı

°√∞‚ ßÿ ˆ∞˙« ©‚¶ ™Î ©‚Œ ŸÃ¬ Õ˙ ø√°

™ÎŒÂ, ™ÎÕÃÓ, ™Î∏, ™Îμ Ó« ∏∂° ˚Û ˆμ‚

ª Ì¡œ© ’∫Ê˝° Η ŸÁ— ¨∏° ¯‡«Ì ÷Ÿ[8-11].

ˆ∞˙« ’∫ª ß— Ê˝∏Œ ߸˝, π-÷ ’∫˝, ˆ≠≥Æ

˝ Ó« £‹— ’∫ Ê˝Ã ˚Ϋ˙∏Á, ’∫∞˙°  Ωƒ¶ ÷

‚˚∏Œ ¯fiœ©  Ωƒ¶ fi∫ ∞˙« π“Œß∏ ° ˆ¶ fi Δ ˙¬ Û¬°≠ ≠— ≠–›¿ª œ∏∞¬  Ωƒ ≥Æ Ê˝Ã ÷ Ÿ[12-14].

ª ÌÆ°≠¬ ˆ≠≥Æ« ›¿∫ª ı°√— ’∫ ∞˙« ™Î

≠ ◊ ∏∂ ≥±∏Œ °∫μ¶ ‚Û√∞Ì⁄ œ¥Ÿ. ZnO/SnO2

° Η ’∫∏Œ ˆ≠≥Æ˝˙  Ωƒ ¸≥Æ ƒ ˆ≠≥Æ˝ª Á Μ¥∏Á, ˆ∞˙« °∫° ›¿∫ ÷fl∫ Ø‚≠’∞(volatile organic compounds)Œ °∫√, ÁÁ£, ΔºÆ À•˜ÂÕNO°

Η ÀˆØ∫ª ¨∏œ¥Ÿ.

2. «Ë Ê˝

2.1 ˆ∞˙« ’∫

ˆ∞˙ŒZn/SnO2« ’∫∫ ˆ≠≥Æ˝(HDP)˙  Ωƒ ¸≥

1ʜΖ≥ ›”≈“Á¯–˙(Dept. of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering)

80 Daehakro, Bukgu, Daegu 702-701, Korea

2≠¯Î–≥ ¸⁄§∏Î≈¯–Œ(Department of Electronic, Information & Communication Engineering)

Joongangro, Samcheok, Kangwon, 245-711, Korea

+Corresponding author : [email protected]

(Received : Oct. 12, 2012, Revised : Nov. 9, 2012, Accepted : Nov. 19, 2012)

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc/3.0)which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

(2)

Æ ƒ ˆ≠≥Æ˝(UHDP)Œ ¯‡œ¥Ÿ. ÃÈ ’∫ª ß— ∞˙∫

Tin chloride(SnCl4§5H2O, 98%, Aldrich, USA)ÕZinc acetate dehydrate ((C2H3O2)2Zn§2H2O, 99.999%, Aldrich, USA)ÃÁ,

ˆÍ≠™Æ˝(NaOH)˙ °∫√(40 ml)/ªÃ¬ˆ(40 ml)°Tin chlorideÕZinc acetate dehydrate1:1 Ò≤Œ ∑°œ© fl Ï

©Zn˙Snà Îÿ» Î◊ª ∏È˙Ÿ. à Î◊∫ ˆ≠≥ƶ ßÿ

180…°≠15√£ ø» ˆ≠≥ƶ œ¥Ÿ. «— ∞∫ Î◊∫  Ω ƒ –‚‚¶ ÁΜ©20 KHz, 500 W « ∂«°≠1 h ø» ¸≥

Æ ƒ°180…°≠15√£ ø» ˆ≠≥Æ œ¥Ÿ. ˆ≠≥Æ ƒ “¯

∞ ◊ ™Æ˝ ì, ∞“ ì Óª ¶≈œ‚ ßœ© ¯…–Æ‚Œ º¥œ© ÚÓ¯ ߸∞∫90…°≠10√£ ø» «∂œ© ˆ–ª

¶≈— ⁄ Ȉ« –ªª Ú˙Ÿ. –ª∫ ∑°«¬[Zn2+]:[Sn4+]«

Ù ‘ÆÒ¶ ¶Óœ¥∏Á, ◊ Ò≤∫1:1, 1:3, 1:5, 1:7Œ œ¥Ÿ. 2.2 æ≠« ¶¤ ◊ ¯§

æ≠ ¶¤ª ßÿ «Æ‹ ˛Ã¤¶MEMS¯§≥Æœ© Fig. 2

Õ ∞à ‚«ª ∏È˙∏Á, æ≠ ø¤ª ß— ˜ÕÕ ˆ∞˙ª ß— ¸ÿ∏Œ ∏∫«Ó ÷Ÿ. ‚«« ©‚¬1.8 mm ø1.8 mm

ÃÁ, ˆ∞˙« ı¯ Œ–∫ fl”°0.9 mm ø0.9 mmŒ ∏∫

«Ó ÷Ÿ.

ˆ∞˙∫ ·-◊«Óª ÁΜ© ΩØÆŒ ∏ÈÓ ¸ÿ ß° √

¡100…°≠1√£ ø» «∂— ƒ°600…°≠1√£ ø» “∫

œ¥Ÿ. æ≠« ¿‰∫ Δ° ƒ(1)ª ÁΜ¥Ÿ.

3. ·˙ ◊ Ì˚

3.1 ˆ∞˙« –Æ

ˆ≠≥Æ˝∏Œ ’∫—ZnO/SnO2«FE-SEMÃȬ Fig. 3

˙ ∞à ™∏μŸ. [Zn2+]:[Sn4+]« Ò≤Ã1:1°≠flake« Á∏

Œ ™∏™Ì, 1:3°≠¬ ŒÂÕ ÀªÃ ¸¬° ™∏μŸ. Zn∫ Œ

ÂŒ ’∫«˙ÌSn∫ ∏¸∏Œ ™∏™Ì ÷∏Á, Sn« Áà ı°

‘° ˚Û ∏¸° ŒÂ° ŸÓ ÷¬nano-urchin ∏∂Œ ™∏μ

Ÿ. «—[Zn2+]:[Sn4+]« Ò≤° ˚• Ò•È˚∫1:1°≠¬12.715 m2/gŒ ™∏μ∏Á, 1:5°≠ °Â ´21.457à «˙Ì1:7, 1:9Œ

Ø“ˆœ Ò•È˚∫19.8, 18.17Œ “œ¥Ÿ.

 Ωƒ ¸≥ƃ ˆ≠≥ƶ «‡œ© Ú∫ ZnO/SnO2«FE- SEM« ÃȬFig. 4Õ ∞à ™∏μ∏Á, ˆ≠≥ư≠Õ ∞à Zn˙Sn« Ò≤Ã1:3˙1:5° ≠ ™ÎŒÂÕnano-urchin∏∂

Œ ™∏μŸ.  Ωƒ ¸≥Æ— ÊÏZn˙Sn« Ò≤° ˚Û Ò • È˚∫1:3°≠58.9ÃÌ1:5°≠194.2Œ ˆ≠≥Æ∏ ˆ‡— ÊÏ

∏Ÿ ‡10˰ ı°œ¥Ÿ. Fig. 3˙Fig. 4°≠ ™∏≠ Õ˙ ∞Ã

SnO2°ZnÃ μŒ «Ó≠ ’∫∞« Áà ؜Á, [Zn2+]:[Sn4+]

Ù ‘ÆÒ° ´ 삪 fi¬ Õª À ˆ ÷Ÿ[15]. «—,  Ωƒ ≥Æ

¶ — ƒ° ˆ≠≥Æ Ê˝ª ˚Μ‘ «È øœ—[Zn2+]:[Sn4+]

Ù ‘ÆÒ°≠ Ò•È˚à ı°œ¬ ∏∂¶ ∏È ˆ ÷Ì ÃÕ∫ ı Fig. . 2. MEMS substrate for sensor.

S (%) = Rair R- Rairgas ø100 (1)

Fig. 1. The preparation process of Zn/SnO2.

Fig. 3. FE-SEM image of Zn/SnO2by HDP : The ratio [Zn2+]:

[Sn4+] of (a) 1:1, (b)1:3, (c) 1:5, (d) 1:7.

(3)

–∫ Ò•È˚ª °ˆ‘ «Ó ‹Œ°∫Èà ̯“ ˆ ÷¬ ÁÃÆ Èà ı°œ¥Ÿ.

3.2 °∫ Àˆ Ø∫

ˆ≠≥Æ˝˙  Ωƒ ¸≥ƃ ˆ≠≥Æ˝° ˚Û ’∫» –ª Œ ¶¤— æ≠«VOCs °∫° Η ÀˆØ∫ª ¯§œ¥Ÿ. Àˆ

°∫¬ °∫√, ÁÁ£, ΔºÆÀ•˜Â, œÍ≠˙“« °∫Œ ø

¤ ¬μ¬300…°≠ ¯§œ¥Ÿ.

ˆ≠≥Æ˝∏Œ ’∫—Zn/SnO2Œ ∏Á æ≠« ¿‰∫Fig. 5

° ™∏¬∏Á, °∫√ °∫° Η ›¿ª ¯§— ·˙ß. ¿‰

Ó±∫[Zn2+]:[Sn4+]« Ò≤° ˚Û ˜Ã° ÷∏Á, 1:7°≠ °Â

Ù∫ μ¶ ™∏ªÌ1:1°≠ °Â ∑∫ μ° ™∏μŸ. æ≠«

μ¬ °∫Õ ›¿œ¬ Ò•È˚« 삪 fi¬ Õª À ˆ ÷Ÿ.

Fig. 6°≠ ÁÁ£ °∫° Η ˆ≠≥ÆÕ  Ωƒ ¸≥Æ — æ

≠¶ ø√° ¯§— ·˙ß.  Ωƒ ¸≥ƃ ˆ≠≥Æ » æ≠«

μ° Ù‘ ™∏™Ì ÷∏Á, ÃÕ∫ Ò•È˚à ı°— μ‚∏Œ

«‹»Ÿ. [Zn2+]:[Sn4+]« «— Ò≤Ã1:3 ∏Ÿ¬1:5° ∂› Ù‘

™∏™Ì ÷Ÿ.

Fig. 7∫ ΔºÆÀ•˜Â °∫0.05 ppmŒÕ1 ppmÓˆ ¯§

·˙ß.  Ωƒ ¸≥Æ» æ≠°≠[Zn2+]:[Sn4+]« Ù ‘ÆÒ°

1:5 ¶¤» æ≠∏à ˆØ∫ª ∏¥Ÿ. «—Fig. 8∫ œÍ≠˙“

Fig. 4. FE-SEM image of Zn/SnO2UHDP ; The ratio[Zn2+]:

[Sn4+] of (a) 1:3, (b) 1:5.

Fig. 5. The Response of Zn/SnO2sensors to ethanol ; (a) hydro- thermal process, (b) Ultrasonic and hydrothermal process.

Fig. 6. The response of Zn/SnO2sensors to toluene.

Fig. 7. The response of Zn/SnO2sensors to acetaldehyde.

Fig. 8. The response of Zn/SnO2sensors to NO.

(b) (a)

(4)

°∫° Η ¯§ ·˙Œ0.2, 2, 4 ppmª ¯§œ¥∏Á, ΔºÆÀ

•˜ÂÕ ∞à  Ωƒ ¸≥ƃ ˆ≠≥Æ » æ≠ fl°≠

[Zn2+]:[Sn4+]« Ù ‘ÆÒ°1:5 ¶¤» æ≠°≠ ›¿Ã ÷˙Ÿ.

ÃÈ °∫° ›¿— æ≠¬ Ò•È˚Ã190 m2/g ÃÛÃ˙Ÿ.

4. ·–

ª ¨∏°≠Zn/SnO2∞˙ª ’∫œ‚ ßœ© ˆ≠≥Æ˝˙  

Ωƒ ¸≥Æ ƒ ˆ≠≥ƶ «√œ© æ≠¶ ¶¤œ© ¯§œ¥Ÿ.

ˆ∞˙« ∏∂Õ Ò•È˚∫[Zn2+]:[Sn4+]« Ù ‘ÆÒ° ˚Û ŒÂ «¬urchin∏∂Œ ™∏μŸ. Zn/SnO2°≠Zn™ÎŒÂŒ ∫

œ¬• ÒÿSnO2¬ ‘⁄ ¸¬Œ ÷∏«ŒSnO2« Áà ˚Óˆ

È[Zn2+]∫ ŒÂŒ ¸∫«Á[Sn4+]∫ ŒÂ« fl…° ıì Á

«urchin∏∂¶ Æfl‘ «Ó Ò•È˚∫ ı°œ¥Ÿ.  Ωƒ ¸≥

Ƭ[Zn2+], [Sn4+]« ‘⁄¶ ¤‘ –‚œ© ˆ≠≥Æ “ ß ›¿

à fl œÓØ ˆ ÷˙Ÿ. ˚Û≠  Ωƒ ¸≥Ƭ Ò•È˚∫ Ù ‘ ÆÒ° ˚Û3~9Ë ı°œ¥Ÿ.

ˆ≠≥Æ˝ª Îÿ ’∫»Zn/SnO2∞˙° Òœ©  Ωƒ ¸≥

ƃ ˆ≠≥Æ˝ª ÁΜ© ’∫»Zn/SnO2¬ ÁÁ£, °∫√°

∫° Μ© Ù∫ μ Ø∫ª ∏¥Ÿ. œÍ≠˙“, ΔºÆÀ•˜Â

°∫° Η ˙Ûμ« ¯§œ‚ ß— ˆ∞˙« Ò•È˚« μ‚

ª ÆŒœŸ.

Á« ¤

Ã ÌÆ∫2009‚μ ʜΖ≥ ¨∏‚ ≥ˆ ¨∏Ò° «œ©

¨∏«˙Ω.

REFERENCES

[1] D. D. Lee, W. Y. Chung, and B. K. Sohn, “High sensitivity and selectivity methane gas sensors doped with Rh as a catalyst”, Sens. Actuators B, Vol. 13, pp.

252-255, 1993.

[2] F. H. Ribeiro, M. Chow, and R. A. D Betta, “Kinetics of the complete oxidation of methane over supported palladium catalysts”, J. of Catal., Vol. 146, p. 533, 1994.

[3] R. Burch, F. J. Urbaro, and P. K. Loader, “Methane combustion over palladium catalysts”, Appl. Catal.

A, Vol. 123, pp. 173-184, 1995

[4] G. Korotcenkov, “Metal oxides for solid-state gas

sensors: what determines our choice?”, Mater. Sci Eng. B, Vol. 139, pp. 1-23, 2007.

[5] N. Yamazoe, “Toward innovation of gas sensor technology”, Sens. Actuators B, Vol. 108, pp. 2-14, 2005.

[6] N. Yamazoe, “New approaches for improving semi- condutor gas sensors”, Sens. Actuators B, Vol. 5, pp.

7-19, 1991.

[7] D. D. Lee, “Chemical sensors technology”, J. Sensor Sci. & Tech., Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-21, 2009.

[8] E. Oh and H. Choi, “High performance NO2gas sensor based on ZnO nanorod grown by ultra sonic irradiation”, Sens. Actuators B, Vol. 141, pp. 239- 243, 2009.

[9] M.W. Ahn, K.S. Park, J.H. Heo, J.G. Park, D.W.

Kim, K. J. Choi, J.H. Lee, and S.H. Hong, “Gas properties of defect-controlled ZnO-nanowire gas sensor”, J. Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 93, p. 263103, 2008.

[10] S. L. Zhang, B. H. Cho, J. B. Yu, J. O. Lim, H. G.

Byun, and J. S. Huh, “Preparation, characterization and sensing properties of ZnO nanotubes”, Sens.

Lett., Vol. 9, pp. 374-378, 2011.

[11] S. L. Zhang, B. H. Cho, J. B. Yu, J. O. Lim, H. G.

Byun, D.D. Lee, and J. S. Huh, “Volatile organic compounds gas sensing properties of ZnO nanorings”, Sens. Lett., Vol. 9, pp. 845–849, 2011.

[12] P. M. Aneesh, K. A. Vanaja, and M. K. Jayaraj,

“Synthsis of ZnO nanoparticle's by hydrothermal method”, Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 6639, 66390J, Cali- fonia, USA, 2007.

[13] S. H. Jung, E. Oh, K. H. Lee, W. Park, and S. H.

Jeong, “A sonochemical method for fabricating aligned ZnO nanorods”, Adv. Mater. Vol. 19, pp.

749-753, 2007.

[14] K. H. Kim, J. G. Kim, and K. C. Park, “The CO sensing properties of thick film gas sensor using Co3O4powders prepared by hydrothermal reaction method”, J. Sensor Sci. & Tech., Vol. 19, No. 5, pp.

385-390, 2010.

[15] X. Ding, D. Zeng, and C. Xie, “Controlled growth of SnO2 nanorods clusters via Zndoping and its influence on gas-sensing properties”, Sens.

Actuators B, Vol. 149, pp. 336-344, 2010.

(5)

Ø ÿ Œ(Joon Boo Yu)

U1992‚ ¸øÎ–≥ ¸⁄¯–˙(¯–Á)

U1996‚ ¸øÎ–≥ ¸⁄¯–˙(¯–Æ

Á)

U2010‚ ʜΖ≥ ›”≈“Á¯–˙(¯

–⁄Á)

U÷¸…–fl: æ≠ Á· ◊ æ≠√∫¤,

≠–æ≠« «·–fl ¿Î

μ ¬ Δ(Seoung-Hun Do)

U2009‚ ʜΖ≥ ›”≈“Á¯–˙

(¯–Á)

U2011‚ ʜΖ≥ ™Î˙–‚˙˙(¯–

ÆÁ)

U÷¸…–fl: æ≠ Á·

Ø ¸ ‚(Hyung Gi Byun)

U1994‚ «º∫ÕΖ≥(¯–⁄Á)

U1996 ~ ˆÁ ≠¯Î–≥ ¸⁄§∏Î≈¯

–Œ ≥ˆ

U÷¸…–fl: E-nose, –œŒƒ

„ ı ˆ(Jeung-Soo Huh)

U1994MIT (¯–⁄Á)

U1995 ~ ˆÁ ʜΖ≥ ›”≈“Á¯–

˙ ≥ˆ

U÷¸…–fl: E-Nose, Chemical/Bio sensor

수치

Fig. 3. FE-SEM image of Zn/SnO 2 by HDP : The ratio [Zn 2+ ]:
Fig. 7. The response of Zn/SnO 2 sensors to acetaldehyde.

참조

관련 문서